Bitcoin Forum

Can anyone tell me how any of this is distinguishable from state sponsored child abuse and mutilation? A six year old child doesn't know anything about sex or gender and would say anything their parent or parents want them to to get their approval. This kind of thing is becoming a regular occurrence and CPS are taking people's children over refusing to allow this to be done to their children. This subject needs to have more attention on it. This is an inexcusable trauma and permanent mutilation of children backed by state power. This needs to stop.

https://savejames.com/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=py_AcKYkifU

You're right but Western societies are no longer controlled by sane people.
The feminist matriarchy is in charge and it won't stop until it has completely deconstructed men/boys/masculinity.
They believe to achieve this by attacking defenseless children first, warping their psychology, medicating them.
What can you do?
Police will never arrest the mother and the mother will claim "the boy wanted it".
Only a popular revolt can overthrow this sickness.

whoops
https://www.vox.com/identities/2016/5/13/17938118/transgender-children-transitioning-parenting

Just another case of a father who can't accept that HIS SON is trans.  He probably sees it as a verdict of his own manhood.   /toxicmasculinity

I find this rather interesting.

Still the important part is

Seems to me that hormonal treatment and chirurgical operations shouldn't be delivered if you're not 100% certain or at least at the age of being in charge of yourself.

Can't give a kid age 6 the right to do an operation but not to vote, see my point?

There will never be a perfect solution but clearly, we should avoid any definitive solution as much as possible for kids.

Edit: oh and by the way, it's not normal to adapt legislation, change everything and give so much attention to what is not even 0.2% of the population.

I don't give a fuck about trans and never will.

That is irresponsible parenting.

Nasty divorce battle can fuck up some parents, and kids suffer in the process.

I think the expert who diagnosed him should examine him again.  Clearly, it is not a clear cut case like the mother portrays it.

I think the mother has some mental issues and she is projecting it on the boy.

That's probably it. This "mother" is having her revenge in the most disgusting way. Some people set their house on fire. This one destroys the father's son.

I agree.
What is the guilt of this child
I think there are problems between the couple.
This will certainly ruin the child's life

This So called Mother is severely Demented. I feel bad for the boy.

WHOOPS, you are a psychopath who cares more about Marxism than the mutilation of children. You are a prime example of why it must be stopped. Thank you for exposing yourself for everyone here to see.

Blah blah blah blah...

Boring, trivial and wrong all in one.

Yeah but apart from that you don't deny sources without any reason or explanation at all xD

It's really funny to read you guys after you took a bit of distance. You're so... Predictible xD

Headlines like this give me an unsettling feeling about parents and the struggle to maintain discipline. A 6 year old any gender will never have the median mental capacity to be able to fathom such a decision. To cater to a child's endless imagination in regards to sex is both disgusting and simply abusive. When a child says they want to be an airplane and then proceeds to fly around the room, we don't attach wings to their arms and tell them to jump off a cliff and start flying.

This has NOTHING to do with economic theory/marxism but has everything to do with the long term health of the child.  

I understand the idea of waiting until the child is older to make this permanent decision but by then it may be too late as the social stigma of being trans will already be engrained into the adolescent's mental health.  The outlook is not good for a trans teen. Suicide rate his high, etc etc.  



Taking care of this now is the best option because on one hand the child is old enough to know she is a girl.  Being trans is not just a "phase". We're talking about someone who has likely felt like a girl everyday for as long as she can remember.  She isn't old enough to have been physically abused or lost will to live so there is still time left to save her from that trauma. Mothers want whats best for their children.  It is fathers who often seek some sort of legacy affirmation through their sons.

Male fragility is so rampant that you guys actually think this entire trend is aimed at emasculating you.  

Seems pretty simple to me.

Evaluation of the number of suicides attempted that could be avoided. Evaluation of the number of people teking early treatment regretting it afterwards. Compare if one is much more important than the other.

Take the best of the two solutions.

Easy.

edit: reminds me a bit of vasectomia. Under the pretext that you might regret it later, tons of people and doctors are against it. But studies show that not even 1% of people taking the operation regret it afterwards.
Nobody should care about opinion of both sides. Only thing that matters is the factual impact of the avaibility of the treatment.

Nothing to do with male fragility here. It has to do with a child's mind being able to even comprehend sexuality. You may as well let your 6 year old vote as well. Children will always be children until they have fully developed from it. There is no way to verify if a child is being facetious when they say they want to be a boy or girl. They don't have the developed brain to determine, and we have to wait for the brain to fully develop. Right now, most places say that the threshold is 18, and I think it should be higher.

When a parent is doing this, I feel like it is just a projection. The child just wants to play with toys and be innocent. They can't fathom these concepts at an early age.

Where are you getting that number?  Did you not  know your gender until you were 18?    This has nothing to do with sexuality.  

I am speaking of my country (US) where you are considered a child until 18. (Adults are responsible until 18 is a better way to put it.)

At what age did you finally recognize your gender?

My parents were responsible for my sexuality until 18, I suppose. I'm sure if I had asked to become a princess, my parents wouldn't go assign me a new gender. I would be a pretty humiliated adult if they would let that fantasy run wild, don't you agree?

Why should it matter? The age of being able to recognize your own gender isn't relevant.

Well, the title is wrong, the hormonal treatment is apparently set to start at age 8. Kids are very dumb but I think even I, by age 8 knew my gender, and it would have been much more obvious to the adults around me by then as well. Hopefully the experts are highly qualified and trained otherwise this will be a disaster for everyone.

I don't trust most psychiatrists in the US, most of them seem to be pushing drugs and their services on the pain of forced internment of their patients and veiled threats, they seem to push conformity at the cost of individuality.

Since it's the opinion of the experts + the mother I'm okay with what they're doing because of the fact that transitioning from male to female is very difficult at a later age.

It's interesting that this is considered sexual abuse but the religious right has done far worse for far longer. Circumcisions and mutilation and worse things.


I don't have the facts on this one, and maybe they're not out there yet. So I'm open to changing my mind as they come in. I have studied some college level psychology (AP course) and got high marks for it.

Kids aren't a complete mystery to modern psychology. I'll pose these questions to those against transitioning a child. What if you're wrong? Do you accept trans-people as they are? Is your opinion religiously motivated or based on reason?

I'm sorry for double posting, but I'll also submit this Quora link here. As well as copy pasting the top answer from User: Anna Nguyen
https://www.quora.com/How-common-is-it-for-transgender-people-to-regret-their-gender-transition-possibly-to-the-point-of-transitioning-back


The person above quotes this survey: 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey (USTS)
I will also post a direct link to the full 300 page report here: https://transequality.org/sites/default/files/docs/usts/USTS-Full-Report-Dec17.pdf

I would like to see if a further survey by the US government would support the USTS.

I don't think age matters much, you know what you are, thats what I believe.


You will probably cause more trauma to the child by forcing him to be something that he/she is not.

I do not think I am wrong or right. For me it is a question of resources, mostly.

When it comes to the facts I do believe some people are born in the wrong body. The problem is on how to approach the issue. How much infrastructure and money should everyone put forth on the chance that one child might be telling the truth, or they are playing pretend on a serious topic? Should we start to bring kids to the ER when a boy puts on a dress to play with his friends? Should my parents have brought me to the ER when I played with my 'generic girl toy', or when a sister plays with my 'generic boy toy'?

I guess I don't agree with the treatment at that age in this situation. There has to be a way of knowing, with certainty, that the child is telling the truth before something as serious as gender reassignment surgery should be attempted.

A Child isn't capable of recognizing the weight behind the decision of having a Gender Reassignment , and Science still doesn't really know
what makes people think they have the wrong gender.
I wouldn't let my kid decide if it wants to eat Cheeseburgers all day everday for lunch, so why would you let a child decide if it's in the wrong body at age 6 that's just dangerous and crazy. Some of those "treatments" are not reversible for example if you block your kid's puberty or get a gender reassigment surgery at an early age.
I don't hate trans people and i can accept the choice of "changing" gender when they are of legal age and can decide on their own after a thorough psychiatric evaluation to take HRT and / or get a gender reassignment surgery, it's a mental illness according to medical science with the remedy to the the symptoms mostly being a transition to the other gender.
It's in the DSM-5 ( Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders ) as Gender dysphoria https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_dysphoria .
Please don't let a Child decide if it wants to transition to another gender, when they can't even decide what toy to play with for example.
 

In these cases they'll often give them a hormone mixture that merely delays puberty for some years, giving them extra time to come to a final decision. 6-8 is too young to really decide. (Maybe this is what they're actually doing, and it's just being spun as "chemical castration".)

IMO it's unwise with current technology and culture to substantially modify your body in this way, but I also believe in individual sovereignty, so if you want to do it, that should be up to you. There are obvious problems when dealing with children, though, since children tend to be highly ignorant, and pre-puberty children are biologically programmed to believe what authority figures tell them to believe. In this case, he probably agrees with his mother when he's with his mother, and with his father when he's with his father.

Reason.

The central tenent of medicine is "do no harm."

Marxism is not limited to economic theory, but you already know this because you are so informed about the ideology you espouse right? This whole "trans movement" is DIRECTLY out of The Frankfurt School of Critical Theory (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/critical-theory/). Every time I ever talk to actual transexual people they tell me how much they HATE this horse shit because they just want to be left alone and live normal lives like everyone else, but people like you turn them into tools to achieve their own political goals at THEIR expense, because THEY suffer the push back.

Psychological problems can be treated. Chemical castration, or EVEN JUST DELAYING puberty results in PERMANENT CHANGES to a child's body which they will NEVER BE ABLE TO CHANGE regardless of what they decide later in life. You talk about male fragility, but how much do you think women would be ABSOLUTELY LOSING THEIR SHIT if this was done to little girls and men just wrote them off as being too fragile?

You cite studies about psychological issues and suicide among trans teens, which I don't doubt. The problem however comes with your baseless conclusion that their issues result ONLY from bullying and abuse while TOTALLY IGNORING and even actively hiding the fact that gender dysphoria is often a result of PHYSIOLOGICAL HORMONAL IMBALANCE which can be treated with very high rates of success. Who knew hormonal imbalances can lead to severe psychological issues like depression and suicide right? Meanwhile those that transition show very high rates of suicide and mental problems which you immediately attribute to society victimizing these people because it doesn't serve your political narrative to discuss other alternatives.

This is where the Marxism, Critical Theory, and victim culture comes into play. Who is the real monster here? People objecting about the state sponsored mutilation of children, or psychopaths like you lying to these people and preventing them from getting treatment which might actually help them live happy satisfied lives?

Probably, but it may still be the best option for minimizing harm/risk. If the child strongly, actively wants sex reassignment even after people try to reason them out of it, I don't think that it'd be right to outright prohibit them from pursuing it, and delaying puberty is a way to give them time to mentally mature and consider it before anything too irreversible happens. (This particular case is different because the child's desire is in dispute.)


This is a good point. If someone is experiencing depression due to physiological issues, then this should be treated before doing anything drastic. And non-physiological depression is ~always an internal problem, not an external problem. If someone is utterly depressed about not being the "correct" gender, then this indicates an outlook on life which will probably cause them to be utterly depressed about not having the correct job, or not having the correct amount of money, or being unattractive, etc. Happiness comes primarily from within, not from without.

I'm sure that some people are able to calmly examine reality and decide that they'd be better off after sex reassignment, without unrealistically thinking that this will solve all of their problems. And while I don't think that this is a great idea, it's not my decision to make, and in the end I'm happy that human technology can today sort of deliver on this desire. But some people who end up at this point may be desperately chasing happiness via external factors, which never works and in this case is likely to be particularly counterproductive.

It is normal for young children to have tendencies of the opposite gender. Children that are like this are commonly referred to as “tomboys” and “tomgirls”. These tendencies are okay and children often outgrow this. It is also not uncommon for young children to want to be like other children they are around frequently, so it would be common for a young boy who is frequently around a young girl to want to be like that girl.

Parents especially, but also those who are around a child a lot, have a lot of influence over their children and can get them to say what they want them to say.

A six year old, or a twelve year old is in absolutely no way capable of consenting to this kind of procedure. This is true even if the child is saying they strongly want the procedure.

What the mother is doing very similar to sexual abuse and is arguably more damaging to her child than sexual abuse. The mother should have her children taken away from her at an absolute minimum. A much harsher punishment is more appropriate, but I am not familiar with the relevant TX statutes.   

Why is it children can not buy booze, weed, or tobacco? Why can children not vote, go to war, or consent to sex? These laws exist because society realizes that CHILDREN ARE INCAPABLE OF CONSENTING to things that may have permanent destructive effects on their minds and bodies.

Again, puberty blocking drugs HAVE PERMANENT EFFECTS on the body. If they didn't what would even be the point of using them? Furthermore there is absolutely NO WAY to tell if a child actually naturally has these tendencies or if they are being manipulated by an abusive parent, teacher, or social worker who sees them as a useful pawn to push their own ideologies at great permanent expense to the child.

If adults choose to transition knowing full well that they have the option of hormonal therapy instead of Marxists trying to claim this therapy is some how bigoted, then I have no problem with this. Unfortunately this whole "trans movement" is nothing more than a political movement which does more to harm transsexuals than to help them, and there simply is NO EXCUSE for doing this to a minor, PERIOD.

Ahahahah xD

In the mind of TECSHARE:


Of course, transpeople are just tools of Marxism. You saw right through the lies, we, the Global Marxist Organization, are manipulating LGBT movement in order to bring havoc to the society so we can create a Marxist society from the ashes of capitalism  MOUHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Let me know when you can find a couple brain cells to rub together to form a logical argument, as opposed to making quick lazy statements that you think make you look clever.

How do children even start to have these thoughts in the first place? They must be getting the information that you can change your gender from somewhere and I don't think it's something that spontaneously arises. If you raised children on a desert island I'm almost certain at no point would they ever suggest they feel like a boy trapped in a girls body and vice versa or certainly that they'd want to change their sex. It's like this whole gender fluid/non-binary thing that has become very popular over the last five years or so. If it wasn't for the internet and special snowflakes finding tumblrs and twitter users where people claim they're a different gender to what they obviously are or are non-binary slash gender fluid then I don't think it would be a prevalent thing today. It's getting ridiculous to me now. The amount of times I'll look at someone's twitter or Instagram and they literally state their pronouns in their bios. To me it's just them screaming for attention. Look at me, I'm not what you think I am. Every-time I see someone and they claim they're gender-fluid or non-binary it's usually just white snowflakes who seemingly have nothing to be oppressed about so they invent something to be discriminated against and they throw a hissy fit when you accidentally 'misgender' them. I understand that gender dysphoria is a real thing but I genuinely don't think the majority of these people have it and I'm really not going to refer to a guy or a girl as them/they or the opposite of what they actually are just because they insist so.


But how biased are the TransYouth project? When I was five years old I wanted to be Batman. If someone told me I could identify as batman and wear the little suit I had everyday I probably would have (and I wore it as much as I could much to the chagrin of my parents). Imagine if my parents said to me, no it's okay, you can be batman your entire life if you want. That would probably be more damaging if I was wearing the costume into my teens and running around thinking I was batman. In todays society it's seemingly ok if someone wants to identify as Batman even though most people would find it ridiculous. I personally wouldn't care if my children were gay or transgender (I would just want them to be happy and safe), but I certainly wouldn't be letting them have sex or change their gender until they were an adult regardless of their gender or sexuality but I'd support them as much as I could either way.


I really used to hate the phrase 'political correctness has gone mad' because it used to be used by racists and homophobes after not being able to get away with abusing people for being gay or a minority, but this stuff is going to far now, especially when anyone who speaks out on it is labeled a homophobe or transphobe etc. I'm all for gay rights and even transgender rights but the way certain people are trying to force children to play by the same rules as adults or others to comply with whatever it is they want to be referred to is starting to infringe on free speech and others rights in my opinion. 


If you're not old enough to vote or have sex then you shouldn't be able to change your sex in my opinion. I am also for individual rights, but you couldn't let a child make all their own decisions in life. If you let them chose their own meals they'd probably eat junk food everyday and use mountain dew as mouthwash. I'm a big believer in saying no to a child as little as you can, but I wouldn't let my child play with a gun or smoke cigarettes if they wanted to just like I wouldn't want or let them change gender in their childhood because they don't know any better. Let kids be kids, and if they still feel the same way at 16-18+ then it's time to discuss things.


Is it the best option though? How do you know they're old enough? I would agree that for most transgenderism is not a phase, but for some it is and there are many trans people who regret transitioning or are glad they never went thought with it and that's why it something that should take years to do and not something you can decide on a whim and certainly not when you're a child. Transitioning is also a huge mental and physical thing to go through and we also probably don't have the data on how transitioning so early is going to affect people later in life. What if this becomes acceptable and common for children to start transitioning and then the suicide rates of people who transition in their childhood goes through the roof? Who knows what damage will be done longterm. To me this isn't about me being scared of emasculation but protecting life and the quality of it no matter whether you're gay, straight or truly trans or not.

So logically anyone supporting this believes Evolution is a hoax. Both, the Trans vision of Nature and the theory of (Natural) Evolution, can't be true at the same time.

Your child wanting to be Batman would be the result of him watching a Batman movie and seeing that he is a “good guy” in the plot.

It also could be the result of influence from you, his parent, either from you telling him that it is good to be Batman, by you showing admiration of Batman or you showing that you enjoy the movie.

A parent letting their child dress up as Batman every day is probably doing something wrong. Regardless, letting the child dress up as Batman for as long as they wish is not permanent, the child can stop whenever he wants with trivial effort.

edit:
Doctors will take the Hippocratic Oath (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hippocratic_Oath) when they graduate medical school and become a doctor (the exact text sometimes varies between schools), and one of the lines in the oath is:
"I must not play at god"

One could argue any doctor performing this kind of procedure is violating this oath by trying to play god.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvpws80T1Bo

:o

Wowut?

Theres too much that could be going wrong leading to this post that I can't even begin to unpack it without explanation.  Its just a wild claim with no wild reasoning provided for me to even refute.

This is why the "at what age did you realize your gender?" question is so relevant.  We have people saying children are too young to know their gender which makes me wonder when they had the ability to recognize their own gender.  I knew my gender with certainty for as long as I can remember and can remember having certainty in my gender as far back as age 4.  The people in this thread who don't think children can be self-aware of their own gender until teens were probably gender-fluid or some mix of queer.  

No longer clicked the links coz I don't want to ruin my day but is this the boy with a twin and divorced parents and their forcing the dad to address the boy with a different name when he visit? If yes there's a probability the mom have Munchausen or some other crazies. Seen photos and the boy seem happier when with the dad.


Oh come on, there are people who realize they are trans only much much later in life. What if this boy realized at puberty that he is straight, would they be able to give him his penis back?

If I remember right that is correct, he is a twin.

This is about the kid's gender, not their sexual orientation. BTW, straight trans girls like boys.

I find this topic sad. I wonder if this little boy knows how many people are behind him on being James. The child doesn't stand a chance, it'snot fair. I say this broken with tears, I feel so helpless and crushed with the knowledge of what's happening to the child.

The mother must accept the natural gender of his child since it was the one who has given to her by the Lord/God. I don't know but I think the mother has a psychiatric disorder that needs to be checked. This case is very important and should be seen as a model that the other people will do, as well.

Perhaps these transitions would not be necessary if society would just recognize trans people the way they want to be recognized.  If you,re looking for people to blame, blame the people who won't let women with penises into the bathroom.  Don't blame a mother trying to protect her child from a society that hates its natural physical form. 

I think multisex bathrooms solve things already for this type of confusion.

Almost everyone is willing to identify people as what they choose to be identified as. What people are NOT willing to submit to is being COMPELLED BY LAW to have their speech mandated. They are not willing to spend billions of dollars across the nation to install new bathrooms. They are also not willing to submit their wives, mothers, and children to sick fucks pretending to be trans that as a result of these policies will help them selves to snooping around the women's bathroom just to satiate the desires of less than 1% of the population. If these are the policies there is literally no way to tell the difference legally between a predator stalking their pray and a genuine transsexual. Additionally this has many implications for changing rooms and sports which are again not equitable for the MAJORITY of the population to satiate the wants of a TINY MINORITY of people. This "mother" is a sick abusive piece of shit using her own child as a tool. You don't know that the child "hates" his natural physical form, this is pure projection and is not supported by the evidence. I don't need to look for people to blame, I see very clearly who is to blame, and it is delusional Marxist psychopaths such as yourself using all involved as a tool for your ideological goals.

There is zero difference between this case and a case in which the mother tried to cut off an arm of her son. Whatever the "reason" does not matter.

What is worse than a deluded woman who believed this nonsense propaganda is fools who blindly follow and propagate the ideas.

Useful idiots, all.

I think most people would call this type of person a "man"

True, but one would strongly argue the oppose if his goal was to sow division and discord into the population of the USA.

That would only victimize more people! Who would want to cultivate a culture of victim-hood?

You have to be deluded to believe anything different.

Maybe the rise of the transexual movement is the taxpayer funded teaching of far left wing extremism present on college campuses. It is no wonder why so many Democratic Presidential candidates  in the states are pushing for "free college", they want colleges to impose liberal ideology onto as many students as possible.

edit: spelling

There is no "maybe," instead there is a carefully orchestrated release of "issues," year after year, each more radical and divisive than the last. I would submit this is intentional and planned.

In reality, there is no "rise of the transexual movement." There is only the media hype of issues surrounding a very, very small percentage of the population. This is part of the media setting the issues their handlers want you to talk about and think about.

There is probably a small increase in the number of transexual people recently, but only because of the media hype you discuss.

It is undeniable that the left has made "transexual" rights a talking point and a way to reduce everyone else's rights by way of being forced to change to appease the needs of well under less than 1% of the population.

LOLed so hard at "straight trans". I don't even know what to make of that.

Call it gender, orientation, whatever you want, do you people here even of think sexuality at that age? My point still stands, it's likely gonna be irreversible. We've seen enough "sissy boys" acting like girls who grow up into super straight guys to know how the mind can change.

This boy can't even vote or drink yet and you expect him to make such a life altering decision? I'm fine with people having reassignment, but just wait for the to reach legal age. I don't even remember THAILAND allowing reassignment to kids this young.

https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2019/04/14/frankenstein-designer-kids-what-you-dont-know-about-gender-transitioning-will-blow-your-mind.html

But the debate isn't as simple as that and doesn't end there. I am a Man. I was born a man. I identify as a straight man. But what if I want to tell people I'm a gay trans woman. A woman with a penis as you say. Or I'm gender fluid and some days I want to be a woman and othertimes I want to be a man even though they're either all lies or I just want attention and to feel special and listened to. Does that grant me access to the women's toilets now? Liberals would seemingly argue my case that I should be allowed in the woman's bathroom if I want but that's ridiculous. This discussion is bigger than just letting people do what they want based on what they say they are and you don't need to respect everybody who says they're one thing when they're clearly not. I think there are bigger issues than gender neutral bathrooms as most people probably can coexist with them and we already have gender neutral bathrooms in some places, but there is a reason why we have separate ones. I personally don't mind them as I'm not a creep or a pervert and I can use them without trying to hit on or accost women, but I'm not the one who's at threat here.

There's a good discussion between Ben Shapiro & Blaire White on YouTube. Blair White is a transgender woman but is actually a voice of reason who speaks logically. So much so that the trans community has actually turned against her which says a lot about them as a whole and I would recommend watching it and her other videos. Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hbTwoLah2VY

Adam Conover of Adam Ruins Everything was also on Joe Rogan yesterday and the trans issue came up and the whole issues of transitioning as a child came up. Adam was taking the typical liberal view and saying its fine and should be encouraged and Rogan was destroying him on everything and I recommend watching it. The whole trans athlete thing comes up as well which is another ridiculous scenario this trans issue has caused. Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcAPU6paCxo


I would disagree. It's becoming more popular because it's getting more mainstream exposure and now snowflakes spot it and start adopting it because they now have something to be discriminated against and it has a snowball effect. As I mentioned before, if you raised children on a desert island they probably wouldn't have these issues. It's because you can go on youtube and bloggers are talking about how they're non-binary genderfluid trans and gay that gives other people the idea that they can be too. If they weren't exposed to this nonsense I don't think someone would randomly decide they're gender-fluid. As I said before, I'm all for gay and trans rights but I think many people are just jumping on the bandwagon because they can and there's nothing stopping them and liberals pander to them because that's what they do and both sides should be able to discuss their opinion without just being shut down by being shouted at or labled whateverphobic.



I think liberalism has gone too far now. The left has gone so far left they're coming back around on themselves and verging on fascism and anyone who doesn't agree with them must be silenced or punished. They really don't care about free speech; they just want to shout and scream the loudest to make sure the attention is on them and that's how they win their 'debates'. They don't debate but just shout and scream to drown out the oppositions opinion.

https://governmentslaves.news/2019/04/25/dad-calling-gender-confused-daughter-a-girl-and-not-a-boy-constitutes-family-violence-bc-judge-rules/

How do they know the child is telling the truth? How does a parent even defend their child in this situation?

Exactly my point.

6 year olds tell little lies but they don't orchestrate political conspiracies that last for years and completely change their life.     Gender isn't something people wake up and "want to change".  Its engrained in who you are.  You aren't identifying as a male because thats what you prefer today.  You are identifying as a male because thats what you know you are.  Its the same as trans just doesn't match their birth certificate like it does yours.


This idea that everyone is the "exception" is what drives almost all right-wing histeria.

One trans person lied so now they all might be
A muslim killed someone so now they all might
an immigrant raped someone so now they all might

Stop just worrying about the one toxic skittle and focus on the bag.

And genderfluid people?

You try to make this logical when there is little to none study on the subject and it concerns not even 0.1% of the population.

Stop trying to enforce laws for every minority group of less than 1% of the population especially when you have 0 idea of what they are, what they want, and what we should do.

No, six year olds don't orchestrate conspiracies, but adults do, even at the expense of abusing children. If gender isn't something people wake up and change what is gender fluid then? Regardless children do not yet have a strong sense of gender identity, if at all, and are easily influenced by the people around them such as parents and teachers. This is why psychotics like you target them and use them for your political fantasies. "Everyone is the exception" is a self contradictory statement by the way. If everyone is the exception, no one is. You like to pretend you examples are single incidents rather than a pattern, again because it serves your political motives. If only you were a fraction as clever as you think you are in your mind. Stop worrying about the nut, and focus on deez Captain Postmodern.

Teacher Caught Secretly Pushing 8 Year Old To be "Trans" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7e3NptBQtI

Adults lie too. Sometime they force their beliefs on others as well. Sometimes they will want to influence their children or others in a certain way for their own political beliefs. Just look at the controversy about what techshare posted above. Some people are going to abuse children with this and that's who we should be protecting. I don't care whether someone is gay or trans or not but if you're constantly telling your child from the day it can talk or start to understand things that it's totally ok for you to 'change' gender or be something that it's not then that's going to cause a lot of confusion and more people will start to have gender dysphoria because of this. If you raise your child to be a racist or that it's okay to be a racist then it'll probably grow up to be a racist or thinking that its okay. If you're raising your child gender neutral then it'll probably grow up to be confused about gender. There's a real reason why this whole gender fluid and trans movement has grown in recent years and it's not just because people are magically waking up to it and are suddenly realizing this is what they are or were all along. It's because people see online and in the media that they can be something else if they want and they latch on to it for whatever personal reasons or mental issues they have. A lot of these people just seem like huge attention whores with victim complexes and this is one more thing they can choose to be offended about, not that they actually are a non-binary gender fluid trans bisexual or whatever. Why has this whole gender fluid movement only really just happened or become prevalent over the last five years or so and why hasn't it been something that has been an issue since the dawn of mankind? It's seems purely an internet-age malady of the snowflake generation to me.

It's like if you suddenly start teaching people that it's ok to be trans-racial and that becomes accepted then over the next ten years there'll be a whole load of people coming out as trans racial even though before they probably never considered such thing at all before and they probably never had a single thought that they could be anything different. Look at the whole Rachel Dolezal thing. She literally claimed to be black when she's not. It's ridiculous what she's claiming. I think she just wanted to identify with something and found love and belonging in the black community and hence why she pretends to be one. Sames goes for the LGBTQ community. There's also strong speculation that Shaun King isn't even black as well. For these people they just seem to want to latch onto a minority for whatever insecurities they have. For some people they just want to be different or have some sort of thing to be marginalized or discriminated for and if you're not an ethnic minority you can now be transracial so you have something to complain about and feel victimized for. It's going to get silly very fast.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gKxtXzAgGew

https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1600/1*tNAQhiqJCFeeC_Kymg9MuA.jpeg

It's like Idiocracy all over again.


Sometimes it is if we're to believe the gender fluid people. Some people even argue there's no such thing as gender or that its entirely a social construct (which I don't agree with) so it can't be both. Not everyone claims they've always felt that way either.


This is literally the case with gender fluid people. They're whatever gender they feel like when they wake up that day and we're expected to keep up with their pronouns just so we don't damage a snowflake on its way back down to earth. Also, If its ingrained in who you are then why do so many people decide they're trans later in life. I'm not arguing that there aren't people who are confused about their gender from childhood but I think there are a whole load more people who make the decision or have the realization later in life.  



There's a lot of hysteria coming from both the right and left, but I think the people causing the most hysteria are the 'trans' people themselves forcing their beliefs on others and that we have to submit to their whims or demands. One of their debate tactics is just to shout and scream the loudest to drown out opinions they don't like and have people de-platformed or banned whenever they can. The far left is verging on fascism the way they're going and that's not something we should to tolerate. I'm all open to debate on issues but neither side should be shutting people down or just shouting over them to make their point.

This shit is beyond disgusting. Is that what modern progressiveness is in the US?
To say it's gone too far would be one hell of an understatement. Some counter-movement to this insanity needs to start, and fast.
I worry it may spread to where I live.

THIS IS SICKENING!!! I'am appalled that the court don't consider this as a child abuse?? the mother should be
put on a mental hospital and not be allowed to be close to all her child and who ever did the diagnosis on him should
be jailed and get his licence revoked for endangering the child's life!!!

I feel bad for the child and the father.

Maine trying to make it illegal for medical professionals to advise against gender transitioning.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axjBSZF5SRs

All beings should be legal guardians of themselves first from birth, then parents second. If James wants to become a girl, let him! or her? them?
I, You, They, Them I think that is all we need.

I mean you want to talk about baby mutilation, is there not a religion that chops the tip off kids penis`s, then a old rabi sucks it? is that not pedophilia?

I disagree....

So, everyone should be their own guardian right from birth?
So, we should ask a baby's permission first before feeding him milk? We should ask permission to change their diapers?
If they wanna put their fingers in sockets to be super man, we should allow them? Lol.

Everyone should be their own guardian when they turn adult or maybe when they are matured enough. How do you say babies and toddlers should be their own guardian lmao ?! Specially in cases where it can hamper and damage his/her whole life!

So when he grows up and regrets and ask him mum "mommy why did you do it to me" , mom will reply "when you were a baby, you gave me your permission".... damn

No, they have secondary guardians the parents who act on things they cannot until they can, and if those guardians are not fit, they are replaced.
Do we stop our little on from jumping off the side of a zoo so harambe does not get killed of course because they are not aware of danger yet. ofc.
If you don`t agree you should be your own being from the day you are born, I feel sorry for you.

Dicks out for harambe! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23um2h4YUwU

Even if you are in favor of having 100 different genders, this should still be illegal, no one should ever consider this a normal thing, it's objectively wrong, you can't drink alcohol or have sex but you can change your gender when you are 6 years old? Isn't mutilation a mental illness?

Warning, graphic details: https://summit.news/2019/06/17/ghastly-new-details-emerge-about-lesbian-couple-who-forced-gender-re-assignment-surgery-on-9-year-old-boy/

OMG! Such parents should be deprived of parental rights and this woman should be in asylum, not on a freedom.

As much as i dont agree with the LGBT community, people using this piece of news to say, this is their mentality and all of them are like this are stupid, clearly not all of them are this crazy.

Literally no one here or in the article said that. Don't project your own ideas onto others then wag your finger at them, it is a very bad habit of yours.

50% of the comments of the article mate, you tried to sound intelligent but you fucked up this time.

''These monsters are perfect examples of the LGBTQ mentality''

''It's official - LGBT's worship Satan.''

OOOoh, I see now I am responsible for the comment section (not that I would know what is in it anyway considering I have scripts blocked). I am sure you couldn't possibly apply your standard to literally any topic with an uncensored comment section. What I said is a fact, you have fun stretching and projecting.

Maybe we should wait until the kid is old enough to commit suicide before we recognizing their gender.  Then we can take their claim seriously. 

Or maybe we should give these kids hormonal therapy to balance their hormone levels, a known cause of gender dysphoria and depression, a therapy with high rates of success. Nah, why do that when you can use them as political tools and permanently mutilate them instead? Medical treatments that make healthy happy children are transphobic!

If that is what the individual wants fine and thats why its an option.  No one is saying that shouldn't be an option.

Except you are, because parents have an inordinate amount of influence over children, and plenty of parents, teachers, and social workers indoctrinated in Marxism just like you have no problem at all knowingly or otherwise influencing these children into a situation that will PERMANENTLY HARM THEM in order to virtue signal and serve their political narrative. I would compare it to "Munchhausen by proxy (https://www.medicinenet.com/munchausen_syndrome_by_proxy/article.htm)", it is a well known pathology, especially prevalent in women. Children can not consent to lots of things that permanently effect them, gender transitioning with puberty blockers or surgery should be no different. This is state sanctioned child abuse, there is no other way to describe it.

Again trying to sound smart, did I say you were responsible? Maybe you should read more carefully before trying to act like a smart ass. In my original post I said: "people using this piece of news" note the word "people" and not YOU. You then said "literally" no one here or in the article but again the comments are full of it. You fucked up this time, its ok, it happens, sometimes you can be wrong too.

What the fuck are you even going on about "trying to sound smart?" Yeah why should you discuss the content of the article when you can piss and moan about a handful of retards in the comment section as if it means something. Why even bring it up if not to cast aspersions? Yes, literally no one here, or in the article. Last I checked comments aren't part of articles. Tell me, what exactly did I "fuck up", other than daring to question "people" with a fragile ego? See what I did there?

Why did you post the article then? Didnt you post it to support your argument against the gender reassignment issue? Next time read carefully before trying to be slick. You got owned this time.

Yes... I posted it because they called it "gender reassignment". I thought the topic of the thread made that obvious, but you seem to be preoccupied with your own projections. You didn't answer me, what am I "trying to be slick" about? You enjoy your invisible victory secret king.

You are trying to sound too smart and sometimes it simply backfires, I know your type, it's nothing new, you are one of those guys who think are smarter than everyone else and the rest of the people are all dumbfucks and you are never wrong. Your inability to accept when you are wrong makes you no different than a deeply religious person.

What am I trying to sound too smart about? What did I fuck up? You aren't answering any of my questions. I don't think I am smarter than everyone else and think everyone else is dumb. I just don't talk out of my ass or debate things I don't already know well, or submit to willful knobs just because they repeat themselves over and over again, so I could see how you might get that impression. Are you sure you aren't just describing yourself? Teach me oh secret king, what did I fuck up that you got so much pwnage on me with? If it is so obvious why are you having so much trouble just saying it?

really sick
for about a week ago in brazil 2 lesbians have castrated their son secretly, and when they realised, that he is not becoming a girl, after a half a year they murdered him

https://www.thepostmillennial.com/ontario-family-files-human-rights-complaint-after-six-year-old-girl-upset-by-gender-theory-in-school/

This absolutely absurd. I don't even know what to type. In India they forcefully marry kids at a young age to cousins etc and now this in america. OMG

 
     If by america, you mean United States of America, you are mistaken. The school is Canada. I'm not certain about this particular curriculum though. It's like teaching that there is no such thing as electrical charge because neutrons exist.  If a 6 year old biological female wants to identify as a girl, let her. :D

Don't you just hate when schools try to teach Science to little kids instead of dogma?

Yeah, because mutilating and chemically castrating children is "science".

Though the article is as biased as usual when you give a link, it contains something interesting. Yeah I call that biased when an article use 80% of testimony and 20% of facts.


The one interesting thing is: how to limit extremism in teaching? Because gender theory is perfectly correct and when the teacher says "boys and girls aren't real" she's not wrong as gender are a social construct. But should it be taught in such strong and violent way? The teacher is obviously taking this subject at heart and it impacts her teaching.

That would be the same with a racist teacher in a colonial history class or very religious teacher talking about civilization evolutions. How do you ensure that the personal beliefs of a teacher don't impact the school, or at least not to the point of harming children?


I don't have an answer to this problem.

I would love to see this unbiased news source you claim exists. That would be amazing. How to limit extremism in teaching? Get the federal government out of the educational system. Close The Department of Education. Home school your children. Are you honestly arguing there is zero biological component to gender differences? Here you are again making claims that the "nature vs nurture" debate has been concluded...

Six years old is a little too young for that. You never truly know the reasons for the child "wanting" this. It could simply be that they truly want it, OR it could be very bad parents forcing the child to say that they want it. 6 years old is just too young.

I don't know, as a member of the LGBTQ community, I have much difficulty understanding the "T" part. I can only offer my experience. I pretty much knew my sexual preference by age 11. But at age 6??? I don't recall having the foggiest notion. I do recall that I was an effeminate child. However, if my parents had misconstrued it and went through these drastic measures to reassign my gender, I would have despised them for it. However, that is just my case.
From what I read so far in this case, it appears the child may be "gender expansive." Whatever that means. I'm not certain taking steps to force the child to be a "girl" is the called for action here.

Never said that. Only that your sources are heavily biased as this article is. It relies mainly on testimonials and personnal feelings. Very few facts. Only people saying "yeah she loved school", "the teacher diddn't care about hte well being of the child".
Not factual at all.
Home schooling is the dumbest shit I've ever heard. It's horrible, innefficient and just transfer your own biases directly to children. Try home schooling or talk to someone who has suffer home schooling before saying shit like this.

How the hell would getting the government out of educational system help with limiting extremism? Getting rid of government would somehow magically makes so teachers no longer have political and societal opinions somehow?

It would only creates officialy biased schools. You would get religious school, liberal schools, anarchist schools etc... You would probably end with much MORE extremism because it would be isolated and organized ones.

Would you care to explain shit you say or you're just here to say "government bad, orange man good"?
Your question makes no sense and isn't related to anything I've said. There are biological differences between each individuals so of course I couldn't ever say something as stupid as "there are no biological differences between genders". You really love strawmen don't you?
Have never made this claim. You're the one making me say this. Because you can't make the difference between action and result. Behaviour and social situation. Cultural factors and biological factors. Because you're dumb as a rock ^^

I didn't say you said that, I said that. I asked you to give examples of what you think is an unbiased news source since you are operating under the impression those are a thing. Tell me, in an article almost completely about peoples feelings and beliefs as a subject matter, what kind of hard observable facts would you like to see come to bear on this situation? Perhaps you want a peer reviewed study on this single child's life?

Every home schooled person I have ever met is LIGHTYEARS more intelligent than anyone who I have met educated in public schools. Some of them lack socialization skills, but that can be corrected over time, where as the indoctrination of public schooling tends to be a permanent impediment. So your opinion is parents educating their own children is extremist? I never said get rid of government, I said get rid of The Department of Education, the federal branch of the educational system. States and localities should be making these choices, and most importantly the parents, not Washington D.C. The public school system is already being used to spread extremism to OTHER PEOPLE'S children. Most parents actually care about their children and would never do this to their own, but many don't care enough to stop it from being done to the children of others. This is why home schooling is important, because no one will care for your own children more than you do, and certainly the state and its workers wont.

Again, you are letting your ignorance of your own arguments and ideologies shine through.

"Because gender theory is perfectly correct and when the teacher says "boys and girls aren't real" she's not wrong as gender are a social construct."

Here you are, arguing that gender is a social construct, excluding any biological component to gender identity. For like the fifth time, this is based upon the "nurture" argument in the "nature vs nurture" debate. Biology is nature, social constructs are nurture, hence you are in fact concluding that the debate has been decided regardless if you care to admit it or not. Your jibbering about "action and result" is meaningless. These are all long standing debates in psychology and sociology going back THOUSANDS of years. I promise you The Angry Frenchineer and his little red book of Communisms hasn't solved the riddle.

Ok I'm tired.

You're denying the problems of home schooling.
You're denying the reality of gender theory (which is just based on genetics you know, not really a science I guess).
You're denying the necessity and existence of social construct.
You're denying the difference between nature vs nurture debate (what behavior are linked to biology, what behavior is linked to environment and education, this one is not settled) and the environment vs self importance debate (our existence is more determined by our environment or our own characteristics, this debate is settled since the 20th).
You're denying the FACT that the article YOU presented is 80% testimonials, the lamest possible argument, or more precisely you're denying it's important.
You're denying the self indoctriment of individuals and families.

You're a moron. I can't discuss with you simply because you don't present facts, you present vague impressions like "This is why home schooling is important, because no one will care for your own children more than you do" which is not only wrong but also evade the little bit of social mixety importance.

In your ideal home schooling system, religion will spread like wildefire and what and who you are will be based ONLY on who your parents are. Beautiful.

You're too stupid or too fanatic to even think about the weaknesses of your opinions.

You never cease to be entertaining. If you will notice you didn't actually respond to any of my points, you just pointed out I disagree with you in the form of straw manning and speaking for me followed by some ad hominem attacks. Gender theory is not based on genetics, it is based on "Critical Theory" and Marxism. Just because I don't think social constructs are 100% of what determines certain factors of human behavior doesn't mean I deny it exists or is needed.

"You're denying the difference between nature vs nurture debate (what behavior are linked to biology, what behavior is linked to environment and education, this one is not settled) and the environment vs self importance debate (our existence is more determined by our environment or our own characteristics, this debate is settled since the 20th)."

I can only assume through this poorly constructed verbiage you are trying to make an argument for collectivism over individualism. This debate is by no means settled either. I suspect you are simply confusing your self with similar arguments, but somewhat unrelated context to the original debate of gender being a social construct or a matter of genetics (nature vs nurture). I would assume this unless you are arguing genetic differences between men and women don't exist "because Communism".

I didn't deny anything about the article, I pointed out that the subject matter is inherently subjective and anecdotal. All you are doing is pointing out the obvious, creating another straw man, and speaking for me.

You are off topic on this homeschooling rant anyway, you asked how I thought best to limit extremism and I replied. Your assumptions about "religion spreading like wildefire" are based on nothing and not as much of a big deal as you think it is anyway. I might also point out just because a lot of home schooled kids have religious parents doesn't mean home schooling makes people more religious. Furthermore, who the fuck do you think you are demanding that parents submit their children to the state for indoctrination anyway? If they want to raise their children religious that is their business. People raising their children to be religious is horrible to you but mutilating the genitals of children and chemically castrating them is fine?

You seem to be conflating gender assignments with sexual preferences.  Gender and sexual preference are not the same thing.  I think this is why you are saying 6 is too young and it is too young to be discussing sexual preferences.  

If 6 was too young for gender, we would need to stop assigning gender to children at all.  One thing we know for sure, is that the parents assigning gender at these "gender revels" before the child has even been born is definitely too early.  It just happens to work most of the time because most people are cisgender (i think its 95%).


Every private school is evidence for what he is saying.  I teach at a school where my philosophy aligns and parents seek out our school because of that. "creating global thinkers" is a big part of our mission and we don't have flags in our classrooms.

   Teachers at private schools have a responsibility to teach the values of the school's mission and every mission is biased. Unbiased would be to teach the kids about abortion and concentration camps and let them decide for themselves what is right and wrong but most schools will teach it with a certain bias like "killing babies is wrong" or "telling women what to do with their bodies is wrong" and "putting a group of people in concentration camps is wrong" or "there are consequences for your actions" .

Many private school missions even have politicized language in them.  Look for words like "equality" "global" "diversity" vs "individual" "successful" "productive" and you can pick up on the code.  Then you also have religious rules.  A teacher who is not teaching in accordance with religious rules at a religious school can be fired.  Someone like you would not make long at my school even if he was teaching something like computer science that, in theory, has nothing to do with political views but in a public school, you would be protected.  That is why public schools reduce extremism.  They provide more balance.

Some people happen to be gender fluid... In this case, they believe the child may be "gender expansive." I think it would be grave error to chemically and physically alter such a person. Also, the child may not be transgendered at all, but "questioning." For individuals who are pansexual, gender fluid, "gender expansive." etc etc, 6 may very well indeed be too young to figure out something that is rather complicated.

I think the larger point is it doesn't fucking matter and there should not be a coordinated effort to influence children one way or the other at such a young age because they haven't bothered to explore the situation themselves yet. "Get them while they are young" is a saying because children are malleable and easily influenced, and that is why the Postmodernist Deconstructivist Critical Theorist Marxists such as yourselves target such young children, because they are to young to have figured any of it out for themselves yet. All you are saying here is if the gender fluid/trans/non-binary/attack helicopters don't get to have the identity they want then no one can have an identity. This is at the core of why Critical Theory is so toxic. It uses the logic that equality is brought by denying others their rights and justifying it by acting in the name of some so called victim class.


Every private school eh? You are a teacher and no one ever told you all inclusive statements are generally wrong? Furthermore you have no evidence of this, this is just a list of assumptions on your part. You seem to be under the impression that state run or public schools are without bias. Generally I find those who claim to be the most unbiased usually are desperately attempting to hide it. The state and public schools most certainly do have bias, you just think that is A-OK because they align with your own. That is not the same as being unbiased, which frankly is not possible. Some how your bias is more appropriate that the bias of others in your mind. Some one like me would make you look incompetent in your own classroom by knowing more about the subject matter than you as a teacher. I have done it before. You have no business "educating" anyone, except for maybe being a living example of the failures of Marxism.

Of course you would frame the ability to have open debate as something to be punished, but that is how public and state schools operate isn't it? Punishing those who disagree with the state narrative is something to be proud of in your eyes. Public schools reduce extremism? I guess that's why there is so much violence at them right? I am sure you think it is the fault of guns, and not the fact that it is designed to be a human meat grinder beating out any sense of individuality, critical thought, or free thinking from young minds. The fact that you are in a position to indoctrinate others is terrifying.

In chemistry, we have "rules" and teach young students the rules only to reveal that most of these rules have exceptions later.  Generalizations are valuable when you aren' talking to someone who's main intent is to twist your words into something out of context and derail the disucssion.  Did you really believe I was claiming every single private school?   I was lucky enough to have someone tell me about hyperbole.

Yes I have evidence and spoke of mission statements already.  I've been through the catholic school system and spent a few years coaching and teaching in it.  Religious schools, teach their religious values. period. Thats the whole point of their existence.  Its in every mission statement.  Everything is through that lens.

I'm not saying public schools can't be biased.  Everything has bias.  Public schools usually just represent the bias of the community they are in with a slight shift accounting for all of the right-leaning teachers who don't believe in government-run education.    You can still expect a public school in Topeka Kansas to have a far right bias.  In fact, I met the high school Biology teacher of the children of Phelps family. She talked about how teaching science there was huge struggle but she wanted to do it.  They won't be able to fire her as easily for trying to teach evolution as a private school would.

 For the last six years, I've been to NAIS, POCC, and NSTA national conferences, visited 182 private schools, and spoken with thousands of teachers and administrators.  I know what their schools are about because we discussed the successes/barriers/struggles their schools are having with implementing many of the topics I've discussed here with you and know you consider extreme.

-increasing counseling
-providing breakfast and lunch to all students
-incorporating non judeo-christian holidays and teachings
-converting to non gendered bathrooms
-gender studies
-more diverse representation in faculty and administration
-more diverse student bodies
-what if i say the wrong thing
-emotional well-being
-giving students freedom to organize (womens, gun control, and climate change walkouts)
-how to avoid being targeted by right-wing media


workshops I gave:
-how to teach sex in biology (xy isn't always male)
-sustainability in school buildings (reduce carbon and ecological footprint)
-teaching climate change within every topic instead of as a standalone

More moving goal posts. Now you are moving from what I said, home schooling, to private schools, and now Catholic schools. As usual you argue the points you wish were being discussed, not the ones actually being discussed. Even if the topic was Catholic schools, your personal experience is what is known as "anecdotal information" and is not statistically relevant. You can teach a workshop on underwater lesbian basket weaving, it doesn't make it truthful or useful. You claim state schools are the pinnacle of science and are less bias, but here you are demonstrating you clearly work your own political ideologies and dogmas into your "teaching", things which have nothing whatsoever to do with science, and consist of Marxism masquerading as science.

More actual on topic subject matter: https://www.bitchute.com/video/hDpZPwkDvJVs/

Catholic schools are all private and are examples of non state schools.  NAIS is the national association of independent schools.  Conference topics anecdotes as they represent high demand topics from a large sample size of independent schools coming together at a national level.  In the absence of statsitical data, anecdotal evidence can be useful.  Just because anecdotal evidence isn't as strong as statistical evidence, doesn't mean it must always be completely discredited.
Thats kind of the point.  I wasn't able to do as much of that at a state school as I am at a private school that has institutional support for my "dogmas".  

The point was that state schools provide much more balance while private schools and homeschools provide a specialized, and often extreme bias that caters to the mission/affiliation of the school.   My school was founded to promote social justice while Catholic schools have a mission to teach in accordance with the catechism.  People generally instill their own values in home-schooling.  Those are all inherently biased sources of education.  

And apples and pears are kinds of fruits. What the fuck is your point? I said home schooling and you bring up other forms of schooling then attack that claiming they are the same thing. You are a walking inherently biased "source of education".


"Texas Court Orders Father to Raise His Son As A Transsexual"
www.informationliberation.com/?id=60480

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-08-01/berkeley-couple-support-their-children-aged-4-8-transition

You know, thanks a lot TECSHARE.

Before knowing you, I was only pro free speech and against censorship. I mainly discussed with intelligent people, and even if they were from various political views I saw no reason to censor anyone.

BUT now I understand the point.
Some people are not able to discuss, they are only talking to hear themselves and will continue to yell and yell there nonsense, pushing arbitrary points and deciding that such subject is out topic or such thing isn't in the definition, refuse facts based on their own criterias etc...

And such people kill discussion.
People like you are trully killing debates, because there is absolutely ZERO point in talking with you.

Have you ever admitted to be wrong on anything even once in your life?

There is a reason you've been nominated as the fourth troll of the forum.

If EVERYONE is telling you you're an asshole, maybe it is because you are one :)
Might want to thing about it you know.

Hey mOgliE. Could you be any more obvious of a sock puppet? Don't have the nuts to post under your main account eh? Did you think I was gonna be like "OH NOES EVERYONE HATES ME! I BETTER GO HOME!"? Have fun with your transformation into a totalitarian because you can't back up your beliefs with a logical argument.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/mom-sues-county-for-giving-her-minor-son-sex-change-without-her-consent

The "child" was 17 years old and was granted the emancipated status. I get that the mother didn't like that but that's the case of most parents whose child are granted emancipation status.

If someone is granted emancipation it means he's free to do whatever he wants without referring to his parents no? Unless emancipation is a different legal status in US of course, I don't know anything about this status in other country! :)

No. Learn to read. The required due process through the court was not completed. The school just unilaterally declared it so.

Of course even when someone is politely asking you something stating they don't know much about the official process you have to be a dickhead don't you?

"“Unbelievably, Minnesota statutes authorize a county to deem a minor ‘emancipated’ to receive welfare payments to live on their own and allow medical providers to void parental input if it determines the minor is living apart from the parents and is managing personal financial affairs,” said Kaardal."

Doesn't it mean that they had the right to do so? That's how I understand the sentence.

You didn't just ask a question. You made a statement as if it were fact. This is a statement you would not have made if you even bothered reading the article, which you didn't. If you don't like me being "a dick", maybe don't be so fucking lazy and self assured. Emancipation requires a court process, it can not just be unilaterally declared.

I'm fucking quoting your own article right in my post xD
If you don't want to answer just don't you know

Too bad you aren't intelligent enough to quote correctly. Also reading the article first helps, I still doubt you have, because if you did you would see your point contradicted several times. Also, the statement you made that I was referring to was referring to your original post, which was not a quote. You can't even manage to figure out how to read these short forum posts let alone an article.

ahahahah xD
It's insane, you took so much energy explaining me how dumb/lazy/stupid I am and still haven't explained how the child can be considered emancipated and not emancipated at the same time. I guess it's a difference between authorithy level but I won't know as you just want to insult inferior beings like myself rather than explain your shit.

Sorry I bothered you xD

Actually that is the very first thing I did was make clear they did not do due process. Again, this is why I have zero respect for you as you accuse me of exactly what you do.

"Johns Hopkins professor on child transgender trend: ‘Many will regret this’"

https://www.thecollegefix.com/johns-hopkins-professor-on-child-transgender-trend-many-will-regret-this/

"Hundreds Come Forward Seeking To "Detransition" After Gender Reassignment"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sIAumOcIh1c

There's a little known researcher who is trying to expose evidence in support of a theory that in all likelihood most cases of actual intersex and transgender have been caused by the administration of heavy doses of synthetic hormones during pregnancy. 

Here's a petition he started that explains his findings pretty well:
https://www.change.org/p/the-us-food-and-drug-administration-fda-acknowledge-that-hormone-treatment-during-pregnancy-can-cause-intersex-and-transgender


He's posted further research and articles about it on the site HormoneMatters:
https://www.hormonesmatter.com/author/hugh-easton/

More people need to know about this so it will lead to awareness and stopping the administration of such hormones during pregnancy.

This is an interesting angle to this situation that I had not really considered. It is also a valid point to examine the prevalence of endocrine disruptors that are increasingly finding their way into human food and water supplies.

"Texas Jury Rules To Chemically Castrate 7yo Boy"

https://redoubtnews.com/2019/10/texas-jury-rules-to-chemically-castrate-7yo-boy/

I heard today Rep. Chip Roy is going to put a stop to this nonsense (or already has).