Bitcoin Forum

Hello Bitcointalk Community,


I would like to know from your point of view as an investor how a Team needs to look to get convinced.

Apart from the idear of the project I would be glad to get to know your opinion how a perfect Team looks like.

The reason behind this question is, that some teams have 3-4 members and others show off with 20.

I am looking forward to a good discussion.


Cheers

Your Stag3 Team

The number of the teams doesn't really matter and that doesn't mean you should join projects with one or two teams ,there are new projects that are still hiring new team members but they must have reach some milestones like having good popular advisors ,office address and history of past companies they worked with

Thanks for your response. May i ask you if you currently invest in ICOs ?

A development team for an ICO doesn't have to "look" anything base on the point of view of each investor. They just have to be true with what they are working, no bias, no hidden agenda but true intention of making a project into reality.

I am looking for a few criteria when assessing the team.
First, I want to know they are real people with experience and connection. LinkedIn is mandatory for me.
Second, the team balance is important. I want to see a team comprised of both tech and business people.

Transparency is the key, you want people to give you money, of course, they know who are they going to commit their hard earned money, we have seen in the scam sections where dubious projects are faking team members, just to make them look professional, who are the team and are they really that experts in their field.

So you would rather have a project where the Team works honest and transparent compared to a Team that tries to fake expertise right ?

and if they provide their LinkedIn profiles, try to contact at least one of them and confirm their involvement with the project. sometimes you need to check if what they are saying is true & not using someone else's profile.
I agree with that, the team should have balance. people might know how to handle business but they don't know how to realise their technology. so it's a win win situation to both parties.

If the team is talking about a big project. Of course it would be better if there were a lot of team members. And preferably with experience in the blochkchayn industry. It is difficult to search for information on the team but everything is possible.

True story, thank you for your feedback your response matches my expectation i have towards my own ICO coming up.

Thats true even Linkedin profiles can be fake.

Check out mine.

https://www.linkedin.com/in/marian-m-768046172/

Cheers Looking forward to more feedback

I assume what you mean is that the key to success is transparency right ?

Definitely, what can you hope with those fake expertise? it's better to have an honest team with real and realistic goals than with those too much expectation but will never reach anything with what they say in the future.

I certainly agree. I did observe that many projects try quantity over quality. I always wondered how 10 Advisors can actually help you.

I do think honesty and transparency and good communication is needed more than ever to reach a Soft & Hard cap.

in my opinion the appearance of a good ico team must always display the position in accordance with their expertise and must be accompanied by proof, besides that the ico team must also actively provide news for investors and participants to be able to make trust. that in my opinion

Well the proof would be a solid Linkedin profile i think. Do you agree?.

Yes the team members should engage. Their should ring a bell if they dont.


Thanks for your feedback by the way.


Cheers

Its a real difficult questions but at least they are some clues to identify if Team are truly genuine . Their linkedin Profile must be carefully examined and other social media details.. It is ideal to learn about this date they registered their Social media account and its ideal to contact at least 3 of them and have a conversation with them .Another means of assessment is checking the project rating with ICO Bench or other project rating platform . If their Team are not verified , its not ideal to participate in such project.

If your team doesn't have a slew of lawyers and auditors that know not only US but also laws of every nation that your selling your currency in, then you are a scammer in my eyes and will fail.

Right, if someone who has found to be guilty of some shady behavior and actions before, that's already a red flag for that project.

in my opinion the perfect ICO Team looks like :

1. always respond to questions from investor
2. all transactions during ICO or after ICO (anything related to ICO project) must be transparent
3. team must work according to roadmap and whitepaper that has been made
4. the project and the identity of the team must be clear, so investors can trust to invest in the project
5. the team always notifies the latest information or developments that have occurred on the project from ICO

For me no such thing as perfect ICO team, The most important of any ICO,IEO.ITO is the transparency and the competitive team. It doesnt matter if its not perfect or whatsoever as long as they are capable to deliver the whole concept written in their whitepaper and be sure that the Whitepaper is authentic and not copycats or else its a shady one.

I think that the success of the project does not depend on the number of people in the team. need to consider what kind of scale of the project. If the project is global, then of course only 4 people will not enough for creating a huge project

They should know each other not only coming from different countries and being hired on Fiverr or on linked I have seen some project where the team members do not know each other, every one of them is just hired by an anonymous developer, I encounter one guy who is part of a project that does not know who is the real owner because they only communicate through email.

hey mate, thank you very much for your response. It sounds like a "joke" what you just said, nevertheless i can imagine a few projects work like that and thats pretty shocking.  ???
Anyways that will and wont be the way at the ICO i work on. We prefer transparency and have a core team that knows each other for a very long time; )

I do agree, and of course you can still add new members to the team once you expand. At the end of the day you neet a core team but you want to reach profit and success before you add to many members that cost to much.

I do support your position 100%. It is much better to have people that stand 100% behind the project and can deliver what they promissed in the whitepaper.

There is a saying " don't judge a book by its cover". Therefore, do not judge a team by their number, rather dig within and know what they are capable of doing.
Actually, the number doesn't really matter, what matters is their skills, experience and achievements; this is what will tell if the team will develop a good project or not, as one can only offer what he has.
Therefore to your question, do not look at their number or facial expressions, go for what lies within (knowledge and experience).

Every project teams must be experts in their fields ,I'm talking about professional teams either in engineering and software based or others ,this is the way for any project to have a successful outcome

Thank you for your detailed response it is really appreciated.

I do agree with you that quality goes over quantitiy and the team should be able to deliver on its promisses.

Unfortunately it's become very difficult to determine which team is real. Especially those are newbie on crypto-currency they don't know even how to use Google search to identify fake team. For me, if there is well know team member with existing history they are perfect. Team should active and well experienced on crypto-currency world. New face with no experience is worthless. We can't trust them with fund. So it's very important to know their real background.

Hey thank you for your response. I agree that their are lot of people out there without so much knowledge about the market. The people tat invested early dont let themselve fool again. Nevertheless the adaption of bitcoin will bring newbies to the market that can be "scammed" again and thats said.

LinkedIn might help to track their team's footsteps, but sometimes they manipulate data on LinkedIn. So I don't really believe in LinkedIn unless they really are real people that many people already know. I'm the one who clearly prefers projects that have a strong team, at least one of them is a famous person in the blockchain business.

I their. Can you define me what for you a "famous person" is exactly ?

Cheers

Bigger is not always better, quality is always over quantity, a good team of developers should just consist of real profiles and not some random photos and random names of people from the internet, so you should check them before you give them trust, and also they should know what they are doing meaning you can put a trust in some amateur who knows nothing about crypto or finance or the project that he is going into creating at least one of the developers should have some knowledge.

Thank you for your response it helps to support my view that it might be better to have a core team that is productive and can achieve it sets goals compared to a big team with fake profiles.

The most important thing is that the team must perform all its duties. But how many people in the team do not care about anyone if each member of the community is given enough attention.  The most important thing is to have high-quality information and technical support of the community.

In as much as there are no perfect humans in the same way there are no perfect team. But to us, a user if a platform we can only decide is a team is perfect when they are working according to what the promised OR we can decide if a team is perfect when they have what it takes to deliver on the long run.
Many team jumps into building a platform but while studying them, you will only find out they have little or no knowledge thereby having many advisors who will direct them. Am not saying having advisors is wrong, rather the team need to be experienced first while their advisors will only direct them when appropriate.
So in all ramifications, what defines a perfect team is the experiences gathered over the years with accomplishments justifying their experiences.

I usually visit the Linkedin profiles, and spend some time there to make sure if the team is real or fake, and to see the experience of each member, before considering that their ICO is really promising or just another scam.

Although there is no perfect humans in the world, but let's assume there is; in my own view the perfect team in any project should be able to listen to the community members to hear their views about platform activities. Also, most importantly they should have relevant experience in what they are trying to achieve. Furthermore, they should have a working product as this will show how serious they are thus paving way for them during ICO, in addition to an extent showing investors that they mean business.

A perfect team can be a number from 5 upwards, I think 3 is lean. A project that's solid will require a good number of hands to be able to pull off, so the more the better.

The picture of a perfect ICO team should be a non bias one and a transparent one. A good ICO team should not hide anything from its investors because transparency will make investors trust a particular ICO project but once a team is not transparent enough then its not a good ICO team.

I`m always for transparency, especially in dev`s team. They should represent the project in the best possible light. I don`t believe in perfect ICO team, every team have some good and bad sides, at least in the beginning, Perfect is not something you get right away, it`s something that should be built for years.

well you can see some good project by the team experience.
if there are only few member but have some solid foundation it might be a good project
but you still need to do a research if what written in their porfolio is true.

There are many thing to consider when looking for a perfect team within an ICO. Owing to the recent experience with ICOs, I will say the perfect team is one that already have a Minimum Viable Product (MVP), with this at hand, it will show that the team is different from others who only come for investors funds.
Also, with this MVP, the team will stand a good chance of having a successful ICO while being committed because they will strive to ensure they keep improving as the success of the platform lies within their hands.

I think what's important is not the number of the command and its quality. There can be at least one person in the team, but the main thing is that this person works 100% and puts all his forces into the project. If this happens, then we can say that this is a good team.

Thanks for your feedback. I always believed in quality over quantitiy ;)

But aside from that, MVP that has the potential to hit it in the market or the use case encompasses a large number of users. Some applications or products are created just for the sake that they have something to show to potential investors but in reality, the application is a flop. I have seen a number of projects with their respective application in google play and app store, but how many active users are really using it? It also depends on the kind of application that they want to implement in the community.

Well, for me perfect team is asians with glasses presenting chineese blockchain 4.0 with 1 mln tps which will beat ethereum :)

that doesn't really matter about how much the member of the team and what that matters a lot is about the history of the team.
Remember about byteball and within even a single person and that can create a new consensus that being adopted by some cryptos like NANO and IOTA

I do agree with you that transparency is the key to success and the Team should be able to answer any questions asked.

Team photos do not really matter in cryptocurrency world. All you need is to understand the quality of the project  and avoid scams
There are numrous scam projects that have nice team photos that are likely fake. 

in my opinion, the ico team or a good developer are those who are credible in their field, have a clear CV and a complete identity and a list of previous experiences or research

As long as the team can manage the project on time and wisely they dont need to have a extended team members, for me the more the member the process has been chaotic because there were lots of idea that needs to fullfil. As long as they know what they are doing and the future is clear that is the good team to put your trust with.

Thank you for your response.

I totally agree. The motivation knowledge and the capability to actually turn that project into a success isnt always based on the "status" they have.

Cheers

yep, team member is very important. but, the team also must have a great marketing strategy,
because crypto is just like a product from blockchain,,
so, a good marketing strategy is absolutely needed my friend  ;)

Thanks for your feedback.

Could you tell me what you consider a good Marketing Strategy?

Please let me know.

Cheers

thats true their are a lot of ways to fake.

There is no perfect ICO team, but trying to work optimally and successfully. The important thing is compactness and hard work. It doesn't have to have a lot of development teams, it's better a little but real and full of bright ideas.

sometimes I see the profile of their team and see what skills they have, but everyone knows that in the bounty campaign it is not too much of an assessment because the main thing that is assessed by participants is how much funding they will get. LOL

For me a good project to perfect first of all needs the following
- The talented and experienced team, the extensive relationship found on links
- The team has mentors who are famous in crypto, it will help a lot for the project later
- The team has a partner and famous venture capital funds
- The project is of interest and is sought by many major crypto newspapers to write articles about them

THere will be no perfect ICO team in this community.
As they need to walk on the path of struggles and solutions for the development.
What we should look for is an active team which consist of brilliant and dedicated people.
A great project to offer to the people and a nice marketing.

The funds are not collected enough for a reasons like inability to promote the project features. I have never faced with similar situations which created with purpose. Teams always want to look like different than reality, so the given data is not safe for use.

Firstly, no project team is perfect but what the crypto investors like the most in team of a project is honesty (either concern the project or tram profile information), togetherness and interaction with the investors about new update (this make investors believe the project team actually treat them kindly). However, this is why a lot of people support ETH.

Thanks for your response. You nailed exactly the values i want for the Stag3 ICO. Their must be a energized team behind it.

The math for the great project is not so complicated. We need 3-5 known persons in the team - CEO, CTO, Marketing and some famous advisors. A perfect cap for ICO should not more than 3-5 million like IEO are having right now. And of course a fresh idea.

In my opinion, a good team of a project can be considered a good team when they meet at least these criteria:
1. They are professional on their fields
2. They have experienced to do similar case projects or others with certain experiences.
3. They have a good track record previously to ensure us as the investors that they are real, not scammers.
I think those three criteria will really help us to pick the project and believe on the team.

And if I may add, they are not for get-rich-quick easy scheme but they have the intentions of really achieving their deliverables for the project. They might have the experience but their dedication to the project might be absent. And the dedication and passion of a particular team will only be seen by time.

I may add that the passion can already be seen in the pre phase. The difference to a get-rich-quick easy is, that those people dont show their personality, address of the business or far more their personal information.

yes you are right, maybe experience and expertise are important. but if they are not serious about developing the project, in the end the project will only become Trash. see there are many projects that are dead right now, and they have an experienced team. and the average main reason is because the development does not work well or not according to the specified roadmap.

I would add that most of the team should be public people. That is, they should have active profiles in social networks (at least in Linkedin and Facebook), created not a month before the announcement of the project.

Visiting all profiles from the team via LinkedIn is also an effective way to find out whether he has the ability or not to manage a project. if there is a team profile that is suspicious or cannot be accessed, we should leave the project.

If you are new to project team I want to look legit then they need to provide all the details with transparent of their contact and everything they can do for their investor. Hiding themselves under someone's identity will show them as scam project.

your are making a good point.

Thanks

First of all it should be filled with people that are active. I know that sounds like a no brainer thing but I have seen so many ICO's with team members who are just there for the name and they are mostly just working with the main core owners on some ideas and some funding stuff but that's it.

You can have just 10 people to work on your team and you will still be better than anyone ever. Everyone has to have their own positions and works cut out for them and they need to do it every single waking hour of the day. You have a community manager? Well that person has to talk with people all around the social media and bitcointalk and wherever else all day everyday, you have a CTO and a coder? They have to code and make it better every single day, you have marketing expert... well you got it. Most of the teams just exist as a team but we see very little action from them, we need actual concrete action.

The number of members is not a sure reference that the team is a great team, but a good team is an experienced team, meaning you have to look at the people behind the ICO, because the success of an ICO is due to the big name of the ICO team

Any team should be well educated and know everything about their project, they should make good marketing decisions to support the hype around their projects. Furthermore, they need to stick to their roadmap and keep their promises.

It depend on the largeness of the project. When we are talking about team, we should not consider advisors as part of the team because they aren't part of the core team. For a small scale project, 5-10 team is OK while for a medium scale project, 15-25 team is OK while for the large scale project, 30-50 team member is OK. It is sad to see that despite the fact of enormous project that are being announced every day, 90% of them do not use their real profile. Many of them even use fake names

One of the important points of consideration is team with a verifiable identity, but this does not determine the success of any project but gives some level of confidence and trust that a project is being handled be some verifiable individuals

every investor certainly has their own views, I personally believe more with projects that have real products, such as exchange platforms. please make your own judgment.

I think if you want to find a good project just seeing a team that is open in running the project gives certainty not a promise and if you want to see the team please visit their profile whether experienced in running projects like in Linkend's profile and I think a lot of teams consist of 10 people are more convincing than 1-4 people

I do not like much team members in any project u want to invest in but I have to admit that I am very fond of Asians especially the Chinese and Koreans, I love participating in projects that are owned by people from those countries because they are my ideal team.

So, do you want to make a new project and ask how to convince the team? of course you have asked exactly what the team must have in the project. But that does not mean a perfect team. Make a solid team, consisting of professionals in the field, truly real, a good track record, and of course experience

Firstly, I'll do findings to know if the team is real. I always like when the team does an AMA on YouTube, so I can ask questions directly. I will also check team profiles on LinkedIn. Secondly I'll look at their experience , especially in relation to the project aim. In as much as i want to see a team with great programmers, I will also look as for business gurus in the team. So in essence, a great team should be real, have good experience and devotion.

I think a the key attributes of a perfect ICO team is the experience with reputable companies in the necessary fields and industries. This is an indication that they have the expertise to make the project succeed

There is no perfect team, a good team should have good developers, good business men, top marketers, if possible notable personalities with experience in crypto. A very good team should put in their best in project development, not only about the money raised during token sale or sales on exchange. A good team should have the community / investors at heart. Do everything possible to avoid massive dips, for instance a buy back policy helps.

I think the perfect ICO team that is able to work well together can develop the ICO and have a good program to attract investors into it. make it a habit to analyze ICO before deciding to join it.

The team is experienced and has a good track record of building an ICO project. And what the number of team members, I think it's not so important. Because the project is with a real concept and has good prospects in the future, I think it would be better.

Alas, only one intention is not enough. It is necessary that the team should include competent developers and competent marketing specialists and, in general, financially competent people.Agree by bringing together motivated students nothing good will come of it.

the people behind it for me , whenever they are famous in ICO thing it would be better , also the idea that fit for me and what im thinking it will work in the future

I think in order to attract investors, the development team must have a product that is real and useful to many people, not just bullshit. there are some that i know ico is really a real product like bitwing and stabledex

Many cases of ico scam and their team are hidden or use cartoons.
if there is no explanation about Team and not found on linkedin, then it is a scam and should be abandoned.

I agree, a profile photo can be an indicator too. We know that the development team is one of the important points of the project's success in getting investor interest. So, by displaying photos that look professional and planned will have a positive impact.
Social media from the developer team must also be observed, it can be an indicator of whether it is really real or fake.
Another important point is the work experience of each member.

Well said and to add on to this, the team can be attributed as good if the credentials of team members are presented. True credentials will determine the expertise level of the team and how able the team can take the ICO or project to its success. However, as said, the team has to be true to the project and its investors irrespective of the credentials.

Your ICO team members must have a lot of blockchain experience, and it will make your profile really better and more interesting. In addition, you should have many famous advisors to ensure the project can be successful

A perfect ICO is the one with 100% transparencies about their team, token allocation, development progress, and some press releases.
The exchange listing is very important too, perfect ICO will be succeed and the token/coin will be listed on reliable exchanges.

for me the number of teams is not so important because the most important thing in the appearance of the team on the project is their experience or background. because what determines the project looks good if the team has a good background and transparency. but it doesn't matter if the team has 3-5 people most importantly they have their respective expertise and their experience is very broad in managing the project.

yes, I see advisors and important people who support and be on their team. if they only list new people they might not really have experience in their field it will be bad. when there is a big name in their team then that is a very strong attraction.

Great ICO has a great experienced team, which are active, have a great roadmap with a development project that already planned to keep its growth, this is some of the qualities of ICO that give ease on me, without hesitating to join in. This kind of qualities attracts investors, not only because of its attractive working products but because of the development they are working on.

I read it here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4986549.0

and found the same deception using the cartoon team.
no doubt.

One great quality that I would say about any team is that they should be bold enough to remain transparent to the public eye, if they really are sure of the prospect of their project, and they know that they are not scammers, why hiding their face under anonymity?

I remember that  in 2017, we have so many developers that would even go as far as convincing most of their investors by creating a presentation for the product in for of seminar and inviting anyone who could attend to come, and anyone who cannot attend, there has been a provision for them to stream it on the system where they can see them speak and then see their face for investor to be convinced, but nowadays, we do not see any of these things again, but every one of them is just hiding under anonymity.

ICO or no ICO i only choose projects based on this two reasons,at first then any other things might follow,but firstly this two are very important
1. Transparency
Either they failed or win they should let the investors know first, every steps must not be in secrecy,many new projects are so shady and i don't like getting involve

2. Dedicated
If a team is been built with dedicated crypto craze people they will hardly have issue,firstly their aim will be for the MASSES not token value or pump and dump,they will be able to tackle problems they might come across since they love their jobs,this is different from those who are working on projects to gain money

actually this is not a matter of the number of teams working with the project, but the most important thing in a project is the background of the team and also the project road map. investors will not put money in the wrong place, so investors have their own ways before choosing a project.

To judge a team based on number isn't the right way, there are some that are few with huge advisors while there are some that are many with few advisors. Irrespective of which is which, the main thing that makes a team worthy of any project is the relevant experience they have acquired over the years. Also, in addition to experience is achievements, this matter a lot and shows if the team are really capable or not.
Furthermore, whether ICO or IEO as the case may be, it follows the same way with the only difference being that in ICO the team can fake their experiences etc while in IEO it is hardly so.

The main key for doing due diligence for ICO team are the existence of the people it self. Does the project team are real?. In some case they using fake profile with using another photo and different name. They use LinkedIn as well and with great portfolio inside it. So you must be more careful with this scam mechanism.

Like one of the mate here said on another post, one thing he does about this linked in profile is to try to check on the team directly, and confirm form them if they are directly into the said project, I know that these scammers are wise to have perfected their plan, but if they use a reputable team, one should be able to also know if the email registered on linked in belongs to them or not .

There are several ways to find out the identity of the team, provided they have the picture on it, and if I have any team that I cannot fully verify the identity through the photo, then I will never give it a thought to try the project out, and that is how many of us too should try and operate, we check that the team is verifiable before we get to take the project serious.

There is no particular look for a good project to invest in nowadays because the scammers already know what you look into and perfect it to look legit to convince you to invest in their project. But look into authenticity of the project team and their track records can be of help to decide whether or not to invest in it.

Or are just doing a research to be more successful in scamming people ?

Team should consist of people with experience in business and relative fields, have expertise in niches they are trying to change.

For me, it is not much important about the number of team members. What is important to me is the linkedin profiles of the team members. Particularly in the profile of team members, seeing that they have worked some good projects in the past makes me more confident in that project. Because at least I think that team are an experienced and successful team.

Perfect team for me more than 5 people, 3/4 of the team has experience in the field of project, some of them done in past similar projects.

First of all, the team must have a strong leader, it is the core. A strong leader does not have to be able to sell, engage in marketing, or understand blockchain. He must be able to find people, real specialists who will do all this, and guide them. In my opinion, this is the key to success.

In 2014, when the Ethereum project appeared, his team did not look perfect, but the project now ranks second in the coinmarketcap rating. Therefore, it is difficult to say whether the project will be successful if we look at the project team, because we must always remember the famous expression “Do not be afraid to do what you do not know how. Remember, the Ark was built by an amateur - the professionals built the Titanic”, I don’t remember the author. Amators sometimes create a project much more interesting than the one created by professionals. I think it is necessary to evaluate the potential of the project comprehensively, objectively, but even in this case there is a risk that we made a mistake.

In my opinion, it is very important that the development team has experience in the crypto industry. Project idea, marketing, etc. are also important.

For me, when considering an ICO project, I will learn about the project's partners. Besides, information about listing transactions, information about project managers and founders is very important. In the end, it's the project community.

Investors like seeing the team members at events, not just one event, but many events. If the project conducts events on a regular basis (consider the example of Bitwings), it builds up trust in the minds of investors.

Another important point - they look out for the advisors. Notable advisors are a good sign for the project and investors.

1. They will be willing to listen to investors ideas either good or bad, hearing the voice of the people will easily make the teams satisfy investors by knowing what they want.
2. Transparency in everyway no shady activities, they will always try to come out clean on every way possible to avoid any doubts

If you look at the project team only from a good point of view (appearance) it's really wrong. Because the design (appearance) in a web can be done by anyone.

The most important thing to see that the Team is really good is the experience of their work, With that a project will be more advanced because they have experience in their respective fields.

For me, at least they meet the following criteria :

1. It is no problem for me to see 3-4 members as a team but their identities are clear enough with appropriate and capable educational background. It must be visible from their social media and recorded no cases of law.

2. They make future goals rationally and choose clear ways to achieve it according to the roadmap.

3. All the team members are responsive and friendly to the customers both investors or bounty hunters.

4. They make reports regularly to the public according to current progress.

In addition to the fact that the ICO team must be composed of professionals, I would like it to fulfill its own conditions specified when joining its ICO bounty campaigns, because recently such teams very often seek to deceive bounty hunters. If a KYC check is carried out, then the possibility of passing it should be already at the initial stage of the ICO, or at least what information will be requested. In general, the KYC check regarding bounty hunters should be decided completely. In my opinion, since we are not investors, the KYC audit should not apply to us.

To me, A perfect team is the members who are all experienced and outstanding with their roles, They have had successful projects in the past.
A good example of a successful project that owns a quality team is the Brave web browser blockchain project with a token called BAT (Basic Attention Token). The founder of BAT is Brendan Erich, who created the very famous programming language, JavaScript and the popular web browser Mozilla Firefox. Besides Bredan Erich, there are also many outstanding and outstanding members

They don't even have twenty on their list, in fact one member of a team showing on the page can make all the difference, as long as that member has a reputation that is equal to Buterin and Dan Larimer.
This is one of the first things I looked on the project, team composition, we see so many so-called professionals and experts on their team composition but they are unknown here on this forum or the Cryptosphere, it seems they just go into the community because of the project, so people are casting doubts on the team composition.

First of all we must first determine if the people behind the project really are, because scammers often make sure that they use fake people or teams for the project. Then teams should always provide updates on the project, and neither should the team or project keep a secret in the communities that support them. And it would have been better if it had been under the IEO exchange which is one of the reputable platforms in the market.

The number of members also makes sure to run a project. It is not possible with the few members they are able to work full time. However, many teams do not determine the success or failure of the project. I saw there was a project that had a minimal team, but it could work well. It depends on their efforts to succeed the project they are running.

Personally, I think that the ICO team should consist of professionals only. Who know their job and can replace their colleague in case of his absence. Further, everything should be carried out clearly defined plan. Since recently all the conditions are not fulfilled, I agree to the set plan. And this greatly undermines the credibility of the entire project.

also if the team has a small number of people but they have a lot of experience - they can make a very good project. Now there is only one problem - the search for investment

Red flags in the WP & Landing is more important than team

A quantity does not determine a quality. I think the perfect team is if we look individually, each of them has enough experience and has a good history in their respective fields. To build a new project, the core team of them must have at least 10 years or more experience to make their project successful. Although there is no guarantee of their background, but with the various experiences they went through, this could be an attraction for investors in investing their funds.

A team that has new and great idea everyday, focus on doing their work on their project, and the most important is they have a team that can make a relationship with the investors, that always answer what investors want to know and have very good marketing skills.

because a good relationship between the investor and the team can foster confidence in the investor, but on the condition that the project is made attractive and has a favorable potential for investors as well. and also the team must be able to convey in a way that is brief and easily understood by investors because investors need an explanation that they can understand