Bitcoin Forum

Other => Meta => Topic started by: TheBeardedBaby on November 11, 2019, 10:02:05 AM



Title: Self-made Legendary Observer - another well-deserved Legendary-xtraelv,Congrats!
Post by: TheBeardedBaby on November 11, 2019, 10:02:05 AM
Ranked Up to Legendary

1st. o_e_l_e_o  (http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1188543)- Ranked up at 798 Ativity (01.01.20)
2nd. joniboini  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1275282)- Ranked up at 812 Activity (15.01.20)
3rd. krogothmanhattan  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1000199)- Ranked up at 1008 Activity (01.02.20)
4th. roycilik  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1051955)- Ranked up at 980 Activity (26.02.20?)
5th. xtraelv  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=897509)- Ranked up at 1008 Activity (31.03.20?)


We are soon entering in the period when if there was not a merit system people should rank up to Legendary.
That's why I'm making this list to see who will enter into the Rank Up Legendary Zone (RULZ) who have received already minimum 990  :)

How it is calculated.

If you account is registered between 9.10.17 - 3.12.17 you most likely was a Member/Jr. or Newbie account in that time, ( included Member rank as well because 10 airdropped merit are only 1% of the requirement for legendary so it's basically nothing.. and of course I'm in the list as well.:P ) I can do it .

We are not that far from Activity 775, just a few weeks more so  let's keep an eye who's gonna be the first Legendary :)

Users who registed between 9.10.17 and 3.12.17 and have received 990 + meirt

   user_id          name         datecreated       rank                   posts      activity      merit      MeritReceived      startedwith      meritsent   
   1291828         iasenko    (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1291828)      2017-11-07 20:39:50.000      Hero Member      3090      742      1301      1291      10      637   
   1275282         joniboini    (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1275282)      2017-11-02 21:27:07.000      Hero Member      3810      742      1161      1151      10      1385   
   1339716         coinlocket$    (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1339716)      2017-11-22 20:49:45.000      Hero Member      5128      728      1111      1101      10      369   


To be included when reaching the merit requirement.
   user_id          name         datecreated       rank                   posts      activity      merit      MeritReceived      startedwith      meritsent   
   1304130         pandukelana2712    (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1304130)      2017-11-12 06:20:14.000      Hero Member      1185      686      885      875      10      565   
   1202061         chimk    (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1202061)      2017-10-10 01:22:39.000      Hero Member      3718      784      780      680      100      11774   
   1292764         tranthidung    (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1292764)      2017-11-08 06:22:57.000      Hero Member      2473      630      771      770      1      280   
   1311641         tvplus006    (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1311641)      2017-11-14 12:14:59.000      Hero Member      1455      658      760      750      10      375   
   1237156         nc50lc    (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1237156)      2017-10-22 03:10:16.000      Hero Member      1735      770      656      646      10      292   
   1283017         masulum    (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1283017)      2017-11-05 11:51:39.000      Hero Member      1323      588      524      524      0      152   
   1237522         Plutosky    (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1237522)      2017-10-22 06:41:53.000      Hero Member      932      714      512      502      10      221   
   1210969         JSRAW    (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1210969)      2017-10-13 00:42:46.000      Hero Member      2155      518      510      510      0      255   

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Updated list with people who had 10 airdropped merit despite the registration date and have over 990 received merit.

   user_id          name         datecreated       rank                   posts      activity      merit      MeritReceived      startedwith      meritsent   
   1291828         iasenko    (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1291828)      2017-11-07 20:39:50.000      Hero Member      3090      742      1301      1291      10      637   
   1275282         joniboini    (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1275282)      2017-11-02 21:27:07.000      Hero Member      3810      742      1161      1151      10      1385   
   1339716         coinlocket$    (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1339716)      2017-11-22 20:49:45.000      Hero Member      5128      728      1111      1101      10      369   
   1169179         BitCryptex    (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1169179)      2017-09-25 13:17:36.000      Hero Member      1436      742      1072      1062      10      516   
   



Planning to do the same for those who registered after 25.01.18 in a couple of months then their planned activity get closed to the Leg. requirement as well as for those who were Full members at that time.



All the credit for the stats goes to DdmrDdmr (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4428616.msg53026653#msg53026653). Big thanks buddy :)


Title: Re: Self-made Legendery Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: TheBeardedBaby on November 11, 2019, 10:02:36 AM
This deserves to be here:
Updated.
~
Here is the list. There are some issues (you'll notice negative starting merits) due to the art and/or caption contests
UserId |UserName              |TsRegistered|Position     |PostCount|Activity|Merit|Airdropped|
-------|----------------------|------------|-------------|---------|--------|-----|----------|
1582324|DdmrDdmr (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1582324)              |  2018-01-04|Hero Member  |4112     |742     |3237 |         0|
1852120|fillippone (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1852120)            |  2018-02-18|Hero Member  |2942     |588     |2274 |         0|
3      |satoshi (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3)               |  2009-11-19|Founder      |575      |364     |2398 |       250|
2033515|mikeywith (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2033515)             |  2018-04-14|Hero Member  |3457     |658     |1839 |         0|
2143453|1miau (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2143453)                 |  2018-05-21|Hero Member  |1928     |616     |1746 |         0|
1878246|abhiseshakana (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1878246)         |  2018-02-25|Hero Member  |1857     |658     |1572 |        -2|
1291828|iasenko (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1291828)               |  2017-11-07|Hero Member  |3337     |812     |1563 |        10|
1138727|VB1001 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1138727)                |  2017-09-04|Sr. Member   |2754     |476     |1480 |         0|
897509 |xtraelv (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=897509)               |  2016-09-09|Hero Member  |2223     |924     |1557 |       100|
1000199|krogothmanhattan (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1000199)      |  2017-05-11|Hero Member  |7319     |994     |1625 |       250|
1177936|Veleor (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1177936)                |  2017-09-29|Hero Member  |1778     |840     |1424 |        99|
2003859|DireWolfM14 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2003859)           |  2018-04-04|Copper Member|2253     |644     |1271 |         0|
1554927|bitmover (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1554927)              |  2017-12-31|Hero Member  |3869     |728     |1250 |         0|
1051955|roycilik (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1051955)              |  2017-07-02|Hero Member  |2289     |938     |1347 |        98|
1292764|tranthidung (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1292764)           |  2017-11-08|Hero Member  |3092     |700     |1213 |         0|
1574226|mu_enrico (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1574226)             |  2018-01-03|Copper Member|1948     |756     |1176 |         0|
1339716|coinlocket$ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1339716)           |  2017-11-22|Hero Member  |5458     |798     |1180 |        10|
188198 |Piggy (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=188198)                 |  2013-12-12|Hero Member  |4629     |784     |1407 |       250|
1825672|morvillz7z (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1825672)            |  2018-02-11|Hero Member  |1479     |616     |1151 |         0|
1169179|BitCryptex (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1169179)            |  2017-09-25|Hero Member  |1529     |826     |1157 |        10|
1855828|taikuri13 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1855828)             |  2018-02-19|Hero Member  |3553     |714     |1127 |         0|
976210 |nullius (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=976210)               |  2017-03-29|Copper Member|1017     |210     |1120 |         0|
1827294|Husna QA (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1827294)              |  2018-02-12|Hero Member  |1563     |700     |1117 |         0|
879277 |Coding Enthusiast (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=879277)     |  2016-07-18|Hero Member  |733      |733     |1348 |       249|
1433865|witcher_sense (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1433865)         |  2017-12-14|Hero Member  |2015     |770     |1097 |         0|
1980983|Coolcryptovator (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1980983)       |  2018-03-28|Copper Member|4016     |672     |1095 |         0|
1982152|lovesmayfamilis (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1982152)       |  2018-03-28|Hero Member  |1549     |560     |1078 |        -1|
1052091|CryptopreneurBrainboss (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1052091)|  2017-07-02|Hero Member  |2344     |686     |1033 |         9|
1180530|theyoungmillionaire (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1180530)   |  2017-10-01|Sr. Member   |376      |376     |1011 |         0|




Title: Re: Self-made Legendery Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: UserU on November 11, 2019, 10:10:51 AM
Wow, they sure progressed fast. Congrats to them!


Title: Re: Self-made Legendery Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: AB de Royse777 on November 11, 2019, 10:18:53 AM
Unlucky me that I was already a hero at that time :-P
It's such a privilege to be a Legendary from 0 merit.


PS: By the way, "Legendary" spells with an "a" after "d" :-D


Title: Re: Self-made Legendery Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: TheBeardedBaby on November 11, 2019, 10:25:02 AM
~
PS: By the way, "Legendary" spells with an "a" after "d" :-D

Thank you for correcting me. Interesting,the second one was correct.
Ill update the list, I see some people who registered earlier but had 10 airdropped merit because of missing a 14 days cycle.


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: BITCOIN4X on November 11, 2019, 10:29:08 AM
~snip~
Chimk is one of the best merit source at the moment, he is number 1 on your list. Chimk is also responsible for increasing the ranking of several other users as I can find in BPIP. Those on the list are the best posters, and it is appropriate that they will rise to become Legendary in the future.
https://i.ibb.co/b14YXFp/Screenshot-6.png (https://ibb.co/VVFbTxX)


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: DdmrDdmr on November 11, 2019, 11:17:51 AM
@Iasenko,

If you want, I can provide you weekly updates of the base file. It’s pretty easy once I calculate my weekly stuff for the Merit Dashboard, so I can provide an update every Friday evening/ Saturday morning at the latest.

If you want me to do it, just let me know if you want me to:

a)   Update the same file (so as not to change the Google Link).
b)   Create a different file each week (if you want access to each week’s data).

I could also trim the account creation time in the process if you don’t want to display the time.

Note: sometimes, we will see a "startedwith" that seems inconsistent. For example, @tranthidung displays 1 merit for this column. What happened in this case (and a few others) is that the profile is merited between the moment the forum generates the merit.txt file, and I scrape the profile data (the TXs + airdrop do not add up to the merit on the profile, and thus startedwith has a non-expected value). It’s just a tiny hiccup, that does not affect too many profiles.

<...> maybe we can update it every 2 weeks <...>
Ok...


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: fillippone on November 11, 2019, 12:14:59 PM
Still too far from the minimume required activity to be included in that list.
Churning activitiy is way more tiring than merits!
I am a patient man, btw. I have to be.


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: AB de Royse777 on November 11, 2019, 01:08:11 PM
~snip~

Thank you for correcting me. Interesting,the second one was correct.
You are welcome. I guessed it that it was a typo error in there.
Anyway, Great achievement buddies. When merit was implemented everyone (most I would say if I have to correct it) thought that this is the end of the ranking system but you lot proved those guys wrong. Keep up the good works.


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: TheBeardedBaby on November 11, 2019, 02:08:13 PM
@Iasenko,

If you want, I can provide you weekly updates of the base file. It’s pretty easy once I calculate my weekly stuff for the Merit Dashboard, so I can provide an update every Friday evening/ Saturday morning at the latest.

If you want me to do it, just let me know if you want me to:

a)   Update the same file (so as not to change the Google Link).
b)   Create a different file each week (if you want access to each week’s data).

I could also trim the account creation time in the process if you don’t want to display the time.

Note: sometimes, we will see a "startedwith" that seems inconsistent. For example, @tranthidung displays 1 merit for this column. What happened in this case (and a few others) is that the profile is merited between the moment the forum generates the merit.txt file, and I scrape the profile data (the TXs + airdrop do not add up to the merit on the profile, and thus startedwith has a non-expected value). It’s just a tiny hiccup, that does not affect too many profiles.


Yeah, that sounds like a good idea, maybe we can update it every 2 weeks and see if anyone has ranked up to Leg. during that time. That would be cool :)
Thank you again for the assitance, !Muchísimas gracias, hombre! ;)


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: tranthidung on November 11, 2019, 03:45:45 PM
My name is here so I'm proud of it.

Total earned merits are not the only factor to judge one user is a good one or vice versa but I hope that I am a 'good' user of the forum. Just thinking of a good user because I think that I am too far from a higher level, a truly valuable asset of the forum, that I aim at for next few years.

I have a club of top merited users (250+) so it contains some statistics that you can use. The club updated weekly with helpful hands from LoyceV. So if DdmrDdmr won't give you updates for whatever reasons, you can use my club's updates as alternative.
[CLUBS] Top Merited-Users Classified into 4 Clubs (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5115154.msg53030602#msg53030602)


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 11, 2019, 04:01:36 PM
So just to be clear what this thread is about...

You want to present another meaningless thread regarding the meaningless accumulation of meaningless merits, but the twist with this one is you are creating rules like first to earn 990 rather than earn 1000 to become a RULZ champ so that you have a great chance to be the first??

Ha ha, meta board. hehe..

0 - 1000 is the only RULZ champ that will be acceptable. Starting with 10?? first to earn 990? hehehe


What about first legend to have iasenko in their username?? is the only real champ?

The 0 - 1000 that does not lose 70% + of the merits if you take their top 20 cycling fans and meta board merits  away is the only RULZ legend that can be the champ of that pretty meaningless heap with any shred of credibility.  

Come on guys this is getting beyond silly.

RULZ champs ONLY

say NO to fake RULZ champs. haha

Any one claiming false RULZ should be shunned.







Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: The Sceptical Chymist on November 11, 2019, 04:11:20 PM
Churning activitiy is way more tiring than merits!
Damn, bro you got the hard part already done.  Judging by the ridiculously low number of members who've ranked up to Legendary from scratch, you should consider yourself fortunate. 

The merit system was designed to make it hard to rank up, and it looks like it's doing a damn good job.  But Jesus, it might be making it too hard to rank up, especially for members who make good, but not excellent, posts.  I'm still thinking more merit sources might be necessary, but I have no way to know how enthusiastic the current ones are about distributing merits.  OTOH, there really haven't been too many threads in Meta lately about how frustrated members are that they aren't ranking up.  I think most members have just come to accept the fact that they won't.

My name is here so I'm proud of it.
You should be.  You earned it and it wasn't an easy thing to do, I'm sure.


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: fillippone on November 11, 2019, 04:22:38 PM
Churning activitiy is way more tiring than merits!
Damn, bro you got the hard part already done.  Judging by the ridiculously low number of members who've ranked up to Legendary from scratch, you should consider yourself fortunate. 

Sorry, I am not English mother tongue,so I am maybe losing some nuisance in the term "fortune",  but I disagree here: I don't consider my merits the result of fortune, but hard work and commitment to the forum. Only this, merits are earned. Maybe you can gets some out of luck (memes, funny comments at the right time, posting news first that start a good thread. But this is fortunate coincidence, you cannot get hundreds of them like this.

The merit system was designed to make it hard to rank up, and it looks like it's doing a damn good job.  But Jesus, it might be making it too hard to rank up, especially for members who make good, but not excellent, posts.  I'm still thinking more merit sources might be necessary, but I have no way to know how enthusiastic the current ones are about distributing merits.
This is why  I started my very own merit source application thread (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5195299.msg52851240#msg52851240). I think some users are willing to commit more in the forum, and I am amongst them.





Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: witcher_sense on November 11, 2019, 04:40:39 PM
I would like to be on this list, but unfortunately, my registration was made on December 14, 2017.

Hopefully, I will someday do this and get up to the legendary rank, but it is still very difficult.

Good luck to everyone in this hard way!


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: El duderino_ on November 11, 2019, 04:48:50 PM
Churning activitiy is way more tiring than merits!
Damn, bro you got the hard part already done.  Judging by the ridiculously low number of members who've ranked up to Legendary from scratch,

Actually is there a list of the members of this ridiculously low number that did so??  :P


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: suchmoon on November 11, 2019, 05:00:41 PM
Good luck to the contestants.

https://i.snipboard.io/JaXf8k.jpg

Someone had to do it.


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: CryptopreneurBrainboss on November 11, 2019, 05:04:10 PM
I think the obvious goal right would be one of the very fortunates users to have achieved the legendary status via merit and then be on the waiting list for legendary status via activity. Although my date of registration was early than your criteria to be on the list, I was a member ranked users when the merit system was introduced and was Airdropped 10 merit although my account was somehow dormant, I wasn't active untill later in the Q4 of 2018 or so when I become very active till date.

Congratulations to all the users on the list, we have all done quite well for ourselves and hopefully we'll all achieve the legendary status sooner or later putting into consideration we keep the momentum ongoing and not relax just because we have made it this far.


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: fillippone on November 11, 2019, 05:20:18 PM
Churning activitiy is way more tiring than merits!
Damn, bro you got the hard part already done.  Judging by the ridiculously low number of members who've ranked up to Legendary from scratch,

Actually is there a list of the members of this ridiculously low number that did so??  :P

If I am good enough with ddmrddmr Merit Dashboard (https://public.tableau.com/profile/ddmrddmr#!/vizhome/BitcointalkMeritDashboard/GlobalSummary), there aren't Legendary members who were newbie when merit system was launched.
There are 28 newbie who are now hero.

https://i.imgur.com/etM9q0O.png

The two new era newbie are:

https://i.imgur.com/KSMU9nQ.png


The other 26 old era newbie are:

https://i.imgur.com/PZqpiHw.png
https://i.imgur.com/abO2wnU.png
https://i.imgur.com/W9Ixkch.png
https://i.imgur.com/uUQiIuL.png
https://i.imgur.com/wYpYktE.png




Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: suchmoon on November 11, 2019, 05:28:48 PM
Edit: removed the 10-merit condition, doesn't make sense to me. IMO anyone who earned 1000+ is bona fide leg&dairy regardless of how they started.

Here are users who started with 10 merits or less, earned 990+ merits, and are not yet Legendary, regardless of registration date:

UserId |UserName        |TsRegistered|Position     |PostCount|Activity|Merit|Airdropped|
-------|----------------|------------|-------------|---------|--------|-----|----------|
1188543|o_e_l_e_o (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1188543)       |  2017-10-05|Hero Member  |4714     |742     |2949 |       100|
1582324|DdmrDdmr (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1582324)        |  2018-01-04|Hero Member  |3563     |672     |2812 |         0|
3      |satoshi (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3)         |  2009-11-19|Founder      |575      |364     |2300 |       250|
1852120|fillippone (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1852120)      |  2018-02-18|Hero Member  |2363     |518     |1583 |         0|
2143453|1miau (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2143453)           |  2018-05-21|Hero Member  |1541     |546     |1477 |         0|
2033515|mikeywith (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2033515)       |  2018-04-14|Hero Member  |3033     |588     |1439 |         0|
1878246|abhiseshakana (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1878246)   |  2018-02-25|Hero Member  |1570     |588     |1393 |         0|
897509 |xtraelv (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=897509)         |  2016-09-09|Hero Member  |2195     |868     |1472 |       100|
1291828|iasenko (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1291828)         |  2017-11-07|Hero Member  |3104     |742     |1312 |        10|
1000199|krogothmanhattan (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1000199)|  2017-05-11|Hero Member  |7074     |924     |1546 |       250|
1275282|joniboini (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1275282)       |  2017-11-02|Hero Member  |3840     |742     |1162 |        10|
188198 |Piggy (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=188198)           |  2013-12-12|Hero Member  |4629     |784     |1385 |       250|
1339716|coinlocket$ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1339716)     |  2017-11-22|Hero Member  |5148     |728     |1115 |        10|
1177936|Veleor (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1177936)          |  2017-09-29|Hero Member  |1694     |770     |1202 |       100|
1554927|bitmover (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1554927)        |  2017-12-31|Hero Member  |3469     |658     |1092 |         0|
1138727|VB1001 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1138727)          |  2017-09-04|Sr. Member   |2316     |406     |1074 |         0|
1169179|BitCryptex (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1169179)      |  2017-09-25|Hero Member  |1439     |756     |1074 |        10|
1051955|roycilik (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1051955)        |  2017-07-02|Hero Member  |2121     |868     |1117 |       100|
1574226|mu_enrico (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1574226)       |  2018-01-03|Copper Member|1737     |686     |1016 |         0|
1825672|morvillz7z (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1825672)      |  2018-02-11|Hero Member  |1279     |546     |1002 |         0|
1855828|taikuri13 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1855828)       |  2018-02-19|Hero Member  |3026     |644     |1000 |         0|


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: El duderino_ on November 11, 2019, 06:26:54 PM
And the one that gainded the merit from below Sr member but are legendary? thats my region and like Hairy Maclairy and I think V8 maybe ... ?

Thx for the other numbers, nice stats, sorry i'm out of merit atm  :-\


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: bitmover on November 11, 2019, 06:48:54 PM
Edit: removed the 10-merit condition, doesn't make sense to me. IMO anyone who earned 1000+ is bona fide leg&dairy regardless of how they started.

I think he added that condition because those users who started with 10 merit are the ones who are going to be near the legendary activity range in a few days.


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: suchmoon on November 11, 2019, 06:54:09 PM
Edit: removed the 10-merit condition, doesn't make sense to me. IMO anyone who earned 1000+ is bona fide leg&dairy regardless of how they started.

I think he added that condition because those users who started with 10 merit are the ones who are going to be near the legendary activity range in a few days.

Simple activity filter is sufficient for that. Look at Piggy and Veleor and oeoeoeoeoe-whatshisname - they're very much in the legendary range but didn't start with 10.


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: mikeywith on November 11, 2019, 07:25:23 PM

After comparing the two lists very closely, technically and mathematically and after applying solid rocket science on both lists ,  I think the list made by suchmoon makes more sense , and that's based on the fact that unlike the other list, this one has my name in it  ;D.

Thanks.


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: TheBeardedBaby on November 11, 2019, 08:46:16 PM
Edit: removed the 10-merit condition, doesn't make sense to me. IMO anyone who earned 1000+ is bona fide leg&dairy regardless of how they started.


I'll tell you why I choose those with only 10 merit.
If you remember the time before merit system the forum was full of signature spammers, no matter of the rank, but there were also people farming accounts. Back then most of the newbies were just low effort bots and people like nullius were really exceptional

After the merit system came, it was very difficult for the newbies to receive merit, somehow the more established members were more likely to be merited, especially if they  have interacted with each other from before. it was also difficult to the members to receive merits especially when you need 90 to rank up to get an avatar. Oh I remember that time very well, I really wanted an  avatar bu it looked almost impossible.

I'm not saying that for those with 100 airdropped was easier, no but you had a longer way and you had a chance to have learned more than a newbie during your time on the forum.

So we grew up with the merit system and everyone who started back then as a member had a long way ahead, now those are entering in the last round of the race and that is why I listed them.
Of course those who registered their accounts after 28.01.18 and got the require 1k merit are the true heroes of system but they still have a few more months with activity to reach the goal.

BTW  the Legendary rank-up period is so wide it can extend a year more you waiting, there's place for everyone :)

You have to really experience the whole process of climbing the ladder from scratch to understand what we're my impressions here.

Hats off to anyone who managed to get 1000 merit despite the registration date.


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: suchmoon on November 11, 2019, 10:15:32 PM
~

Fair enough. Looks like we may need some different Legendary ranks so that we could tell them apart ;D

  • Old worthless pre-merit Legendaries
  • Should-have-been Legendaries who were a week or two from ranking up when the merit system crushed their dreams
  • After-merit Legendaries who had a head start (100+ airdropped merits)
  • Fresh baby-faced (see what I did here) Legendaries who clawed their way through the ranks from 10 or 0 airdropped merits


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: philipma1957 on November 11, 2019, 10:25:19 PM
~

Fair enough. Looks like we may need some different Legendary ranks so that we could tell them apart ;D

  • Old worthless pre-merit Legendaries
  • Should-have-been Legendaries who were a week or two from ranking up when the merit system crushed their dreams
  • After-merit Legendaries who had a head start (100+ airdropped merits)
  • Fresh baby-faced (see what I did here) Legendaries who clawed their way through the ranks from 10 or 0 airdropped merits


Which are you  " old worthless "   even though you have 3000 or more earned merits

or me  I am also "old and worthless"  even though I earned  958 merits. Last I looked I was at 1958  I think I was airdropped 1000 points


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: suchmoon on November 11, 2019, 10:38:22 PM
Which are you  " old worthless "   even though you have 3000 or more earned merits

or me  I am also "old and worthless"  even though I earned  958 merits. Last I looked I was at 1958  I think I was airdropped 1000 points

That's tongue-in-cheek for sure but iasenko has a point. We both have been here for years, trolling learning stuff that may have made it easier for us to live with the merit system, compared to people who joined two years ago and got thrown into the deep end with 0 merits. I know I did earn a few merits for posts made before the merit system, so there is that too.


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: fillippone on November 11, 2019, 10:42:24 PM

After comparing the two lists very closely, technically and mathematically and after applying solid rocket science on both lists ,  I think the list made by suchmoon makes more sense , and that's based on the fact that unlike the other list, this one has my name in it  ;D.

Thanks.

I am sure I saw your name in my list!
 :'(


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: 1miau on November 12, 2019, 12:18:11 AM
Let's complain and create a new topic "Activity is so unfair. Remove it plz."  :P

I'm not saying that for those with 100 airdropped was easier, no but you had a longer way and you had a chance to have learned more than a newbie during your time on the forum.
Actually, I think it's harder to earn Merit when users are Legendary and their Merit is above 1,000.

In our local board (and in local boards in general), Merit is still somehow scarce and people tend to Merit users "in need" of Merit until they get Legendary. That's totally right, I'm also preferring to spend my Merit for lower ranked users even while a big part of very good posts are usually written by high-ranked users. So actually, those users who had airdropped many Merits already have much more difficulties to get a "real" Legendary (1000 Merit earned) while Newbies don't have this disadvantage because lower ranks are getting Merit more frequently. 

Of course, if you are refferring to users until they become Legendary (1,000 Merit in total, no matter if it's earned or airdropped), Brand New users after Merit was introduced have to go the hard way.


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: tranthidung on November 12, 2019, 01:42:44 AM
I'm not saying that for those with 100 airdropped was easier, no but you had a longer way and you had a chance to have learned more than a newbie during your time on the forum.
That's it --- From my experience over last nearly two years with the merit system (we have come closer to the 2nd anniversary of the merit system), users who began from scratch with the merit system mostly have become more reputable here, and likely have better capability to earn more merits.

This is an obvious fact, self-made users (who began from scratches) have never stopped ranking up but users with airdropped merits mostly have been stucked at their ranks at the merit system's birthday. Personally I would prefer to call self-made users as laborious ones.

There are many causal factors but I think there are some very important ones:
  • They began from zero that forced them to learn and work harder than users who got 10/ 100 airdropped merits -- who tend to more lazy to learn several months after the birthday of the merit system. Likely because of they felt satisfied with what they were airdropped (ranks & merits) then when they decided to fight for merits they already fell behind (in both of knowledge, skills and posting habits)
  • They built up their good posting habits from their scratches which in turn help them to rank up gradually from lower to higher ranks. Fortunately, when they ranked up to higher ranks (Senior Member and above) their good posting habits are something like unchangeable. They would prefer to make good posts and I believe most of them say No to shit posts.

To sum up, I meant: Work hard first, then sweet 'fruits' [1] will come later (months or years later).


[1]: Fruits mean merits, ranks, reputation and income.


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: mk4 on November 12, 2019, 02:43:16 AM
Definitely going to bookmark this thread. I'm going to link this topic every time some bonehead says something ridiculous like "iTs iMpOsSiBLe fOr NeWbiE tO eArN MeRiT".


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: masulum on November 12, 2019, 07:54:12 AM
Good enough to see who will be legendary under 1.000 activity on this list. Even this is including me, I think too far for me to join as top three, what i can do maybe competing with JSRAW (same 5xx activity) to become not the last member who get legendary. LOL


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: Jet Cash on November 12, 2019, 08:22:00 AM

The merit system was designed to make it hard to rank up, and it looks like it's doing a damn good job.  But Jesus, it might be making it too hard to rank up, especially for members who make good, but not excellent, posts.  I'm still thinking more merit sources might be necessary, but I have no way to know how enthusiastic the current ones are about distributing merits. 

Most of the members who have received more than a thousand merits have received them for forum related activities, and not for Bitcoin or crypto posting, and this includes me. Whilst stats and discussions about the forum are important, we shouldn't forget that we are here to promote and discuss Bitcoin, and to a lesser extent alts and political changes. Since I have reduced my forum projects, my merit receipts have taken a dive. I believe that merit sources and posters should look to Bitcoin discussions to earn merits.

We are entering a time of great political change. Brexit is massively important, not because the UK will be leaving the EU, but because it has exposed the control and activities of the Anglophone empire. Corporate stock buybacks are open and being discussed, and they indicate insiders opinions of the economic future. Stats like the Bitcoin, Gold and Silver prices, and indices such as the Baltic Dry, PMI and employment are revealing the extent of the changes that are happening. Bitcoin is an important catalyst for future change - lets talk about it.


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: LoyceV on November 12, 2019, 08:26:14 AM
Fair enough. Looks like we may need some different Legendary ranks so that we could tell them apart ;D
My basic assumption is much simpler: I compare Merit to Activity when I want to have a first impression of someone's posting quality.
Code:
if Merit > Activity then good, else bad
Of course there's an acception for "old" members with thousands of Activity but "only" 2000 Merit, they just need more time to catch up.

Let's complain and create a new topic "Activity is so unfair. Remove it plz."  :P
Let's make a new one: Post count + Merit + Activity.

Quote
Actually, I think it's harder to earn Merit when users are Legendary and their Merit is above 1,000.
Some people save their sMerit for the lower ranks, but on the other hands many Legendary users are more recognized. Recognition leads to posts being read, which in turn increases the chance or being Merited.



I've said this a long time ago: Merit allows new users to stand out above the many spammers. Good new users are now easily highlighted by their Merit count.


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: unibitcoinist on November 12, 2019, 08:31:56 AM
Most of the members who have received more than a thousand merits have received them for forum related activities, and not for Bitcoin or crypto posting, and this includes me. Whilst stats and discussions about the forum are important, we shouldn't forget that we are here to promote and discuss Bitcoin, and to a lesser extent alts and political changes.
This is what I was trying to discuss but seems I was busted by the so called ranked member, we are in bitcoin forum, for talking about bitcoin but they don't discuss about bitcoin- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5181224.0

"they" refers a group of people, not everyone  ;)

Forget about this account, this is an alt account- not for any rank up purpose. Sorry that, I can't share my original account.


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: BITCOIN4X on November 12, 2019, 08:48:05 AM
Brand New users after Merit was introduced have to go the hard way.
This is what most brand new complain about, but not many of them are "newbi" who feel ignored by merit sources or any members if they find constructive and useful posts.

Because the level of knowledge of each user is different, many complaints come from those who have low quality posts, while those who can make good posts, they will feel comfortable with this rule.


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: TheBeardedBaby on November 12, 2019, 10:39:28 AM

The merit system was designed to make it hard to rank up, and it looks like it's doing a damn good job.  But Jesus, it might be making it too hard to rank up, especially for members who make good, but not excellent, posts.  I'm still thinking more merit sources might be necessary, but I have no way to know how enthusiastic the current ones are about distributing merits. 

Most of the members who have received more than a thousand merits have received them for forum related activities, and not for Bitcoin or crypto posting, and this includes me. Whilst stats and discussions about the forum are important, we shouldn't forget that we are here to promote and discuss Bitcoin, and to a lesser extent alts and political changes. Since I have reduced my forum projects, my merit receipts have taken a dive. I believe that merit sources and posters should look to Bitcoin discussions to earn merits.

We are entering a time of great political change. Brexit is massively important, not because the UK will be leaving the EU, but because it has exposed the control and activities of the Anglophone empire. Corporate stock buybacks are open and being discussed, and they indicate insiders opinions of the economic future. Stats like the Bitcoin, Gold and Silver prices, and indices such as the Baltic Dry, PMI and employment are revealing the extent of the changes that are happening. Bitcoin is an important catalyst for future change - lets talk about it.

^There are some good points there but think about it, promoting bitcoin on a Bitcointalk board would not have a greater impact ot the normal people (those not related to crypto). What we can do is to actaully promote it outside to those who don't know what bitcoin is or just have heard rummors of scam and criminality related to bitcoin. Those are the people we have to win on our side, not those that are already here.
That's why I have this hanging in my office.
https://i.imgur.com/UsgBQ6M.jpg


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: akamit on November 12, 2019, 02:53:40 PM
Definitely going to bookmark this thread.
I also enabled notification for this thread as I don't want to miss anything regarding the topic.


I'm going to link this topic every time some bonehead says something ridiculous like "iTs iMpOsSiBLe fOr NeWbiE tO eArN MeRiT".
We all know Merits drop like Raindrops in Meta, Rep, BH and WO boards and also to the Chipmixer participants. But not all newbies in the past and in the future will be a Meta, Reputation, BH, and WO poster. Not all newbies and also the old members will get interested in forum things, forum politics or in BH and WO boards. So the ranking difficulty level between the two sides will be always different imo. Those who post in Meta, Rep, BH, WO will rank faster maybe in two years and the other side will rank maybe in 5 years even they are not spammers and are quality posters.

I'm not saying anything against the members mentioned in OP, I know they are quality posters and I do always read their posts and I also know how much efforts they gave to reach the level they are in now.

I also read all posts from all Chipmixer participants (including you) because Chipmixer participants are considered to be the best posters. Chipmixer signature is like a batch[1] badge now and helps in earning merits faster, so to ranking...

What I wanted to say is that for some newbies and old members it may take a long time to rank to Legendary. Even some members will never reach that rank because either they will retire from this forum or will be dead.

Either we need more merit sources to balance the merit drops in all the boards or the current merit sources needs to be more generous in all other boards except those 4 boards.


My best wishes to the members mentioned in OP... Keep up the good work.


[1] I supposed to write Badge but I mistakenly wrote Batch.


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: TheBeardedBaby on November 12, 2019, 03:06:46 PM
By a request from TMAN, I dropped another list to all that have received merit but not enough to reach the Legendary rank but have the activity ( actually that was my initial intention but I extended it a bit). YOu can see it here > https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5200616.msg53056924#msg53056924
Hope more sources will pay attention to it so valuable posters can rank up as well.



Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: tbct_mt2 on November 12, 2019, 03:20:43 PM
I also read all posts from all Chipmixer participants (including you) because Chipmixer participants are considered to be the best posters. Chipmixer signature is like a batch now and helps in earning merits faster, so to ranking...
The first part is right but the second part is wrong. Applicants of ChipMixer must be very good posters to be accepted as participants. I meant they have to be very qualifying before getting acceptance from the manager of ChipMixer (DarkStar_) so they do have very good ability to earn merits.

I don't think the same user will earn more merits in the same period simply because becoming ChipMixer's participant and wearing ChipMixer signature.


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: akamit on November 12, 2019, 04:08:54 PM
I also read all posts from all Chipmixer participants (including you) because Chipmixer participants are considered to be the best posters. Chipmixer signature is like a batch now and helps in earning merits faster, so to ranking...
The first part is right but the second part is wrong. Applicants of ChipMixer must be very good posters to be accepted as participants. I meant they have to be very qualifying before getting acceptance from the manager of ChipMixer (DarkStar_) so they do have very good ability to earn merits.

I don't think the same user will earn more merits in the same period simply because becoming ChipMixer's participant and wearing ChipMixer signature.
Of course, they are quality posters and I don't doubt that and I also don't doubt DS's selection criteria. Those participants would not have got accepted in the first place if they weren't quality posters. My point was different, it's something like psychological I guess if I used the correct word. Chipmixer participants earn more merits than any other campaign participants.

As an example, Cryptotalk participants, do you think they will get more or equal merits the same as Chipmixer participants just because they wore Cryptotalk Signature? Whereas the whole forum keeps tagging one thing "Cryptotalk participants are SPAMMERS"... How many threads do you think are there about Cryptotalk? Don't you think there are quality posters? but they are just buried somewhere, they are barely get recognized because of the actual spammers, the only reason is they wore Cryptotalk signature.



I forget to mention other merit earning aspects in my previous post.

  • Friends (not talking about abuse)
  • Fans
  • Country Man - Local boards (again not talking about abuse)
and so on.  ::)

Those who are earning merits fast to faster, at light speed are either Meta, Rep, BH, WO, Local Boards posters or posting in all and are Chipmixer participants.

As an example, I miss my local board because I can't post there for some reason. If I could post there than I'd have earned more merits, right? So each member has their limitation which will affect their ranking.


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: LoyceV on November 12, 2019, 04:12:51 PM
As an example, Cryptotalk participants, do you think they will get more or equal merits the same as Chipmixer participants just because they wore Cryptotalk Signature? Whereas the whole forum keeps tagging one thing "Cryptotalk participants are SPAMMERS"... How many threads do you think are there about Cryptotalk? Don't you think there are quality posters? but they are just buried somewhere, they are barely get recognized because of the actual spammers, the only reason is they wore Cryptotalk signature.
Your signature on a forum says a lot about you, so if someone wears a "badge of honour", people are more likely to read their posts than someone who wears a "badge of spammers".
I've merited some posts with Cryptotalk signature lately, but I've probably reported more of them, or deleted them from my self-moderated threads.


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: tbct_mt2 on November 12, 2019, 04:13:25 PM
Of course, they are quality posters and I don't doubt that and I also don't doubt DS's selection criteria. Those participants would not have got accepted in the first place if they weren't quality posters. My point was different, it's something like psychological I guess if I used the correct word. Chipmixer participants earn more merits than any other campaign participants.
It is clearer with your explanation. Previously, it is easily to infer your previous post in the way that users will earn merits faster after becoming Chipmixer's participants. I could be wrong in the way I inferred your previous post but I don't think I inferred it inappropriately.

People send merits to quality posts which deserve merits not because of posters wear ChipMixer signature. I (and others) can wear ChipMixer signature too but it does not help me earning merits faster. Different classes of users have different ability and speed of merit earning.

Anyway, thanks for the explanation and I eventually understood what you wanted to point out.

In other aspect, I agree that becoming ChipMixer's participants require them to maintain their post-quality as stably high as possible. Somehow it passively increases ChipMixer's participants' post quality over time but the process is very difficult to realize shortly.


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: fillippone on November 12, 2019, 04:21:46 PM
Your signature on a forum says a lot about you, so if someone wears a "badge of honour", people are more likely to read their posts than someone who wears a "badge of spammers".

I am wearing no signature.
I have my dearest posts in my signature.
I actively refused to wear some signature campaign proposed to me.
If I wear a campaign in the future, I don't think it will alter my posting habits, so I guess my merit flows will be untouched.

I will wear my signature campaign as a "badge of honour", indipendently by the merit or coin flows it will guarantee to me.





Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: DdmrDdmr on November 12, 2019, 04:49:29 PM
I’ve just gone over the Top 50 merited profiles over the last 30 days, and the leading signature is “None or Personal”, followed by a neck-and-neck tie between Chipmixer and Cryptotalk.

The point being that Chipmixer for sure has good posters, but looking at it from a broader view, they represent 16% of the top merited over the past 30 days – the same as CryptoTalk (a larger perspective may change the ratios, but the 30 day one is pretty easy to do). 40% of the list don’t have a campaign signature.

Code:
Row Labels                    Count of Signature
Bitcasino                     1
Bitvest                       1
Blender                       2
Blochchain                    1
Bustadice                     2
Chipmixer                     8
CryptoTalk                    8
Digital Gold                  1
Irony attempt Signature       1
Majestic                      1
Match 365                     2
None or Personal              20
Smart Mixer                   1
Sportsbet                     1
Grand Total                   50

List:
Code:
Merits 30 days                Signature
348: theymos                  None or Personal
265: Corrosive                None or Personal
237: LoyceV                   Chipmixer
206: fillippone               None or Personal
196: Yatsan                   Blender
195: Steamtyme                Chipmixer
181: suchmoon                 Chipmixer
174: Kalemder                 Digital Gold
159: sirazimuth               None or Personal
155: Rikafip                  Bitvest
147: zasad@                   None or Personal
134: Icygreen                 CryptoTalk
134: mikeywith                Chipmixer
130: gmaxwell                 None or Personal
124: Foxpup                   None or Personal
123: micgoossens              None or Personal
121: Ratimov                  None or Personal
120: Laskoo                   None or Personal
118: xtraelv                  None or Personal
116: tk808                    None or Personal
115: kzv                      Irony attempt Signature
112: yogg                     Chipmixer
109: SpendingBitcoin          None or Personal
108: Last of the V8s          None or Personal
106: Basorexia                None or Personal
101: yahoo62278               CryptoTalk
99: masulum                   Smart Mixer
98: TwitchySeal               None or Personal
97: achow101                  None or Personal
93: pooya87                   Chipmixer
93: madnessteat               CryptoTalk
92: Mitchell                  Majestic
91: samcrypto                 Bustadice
91: igor72                    CryptoTalk
90: Hal                       None or Personal
88: nutildah                  Sportsbet
88: LFC_Bitcoin               Bitcasino
87: Carlton Banks             None or Personal
86: iasenko                   Chipmixer
84: sujonali1819              Match 365
82: Xal0lex                   Blochchain
82: GreatArkansas             Blender
80: Darker45                  Match 365
79: A-Bolt                    CryptoTalk
79: FontSeli                  CryptoTalk
78: o_e_l_e_o                 Chipmixer
78: Bttzed03                  CryptoTalk
77: BitcoinFX                 None or Personal
77: witcher_sense             CryptoTalk
77: Lakai01                   Bustadice
Note 1: I may have misinterpreted a corporate signature for a personal case in a case or two.
Note 2: I’m not even on the list, after hitting my ATL (excluding my first month or so here)


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: fillippone on November 12, 2019, 04:58:28 PM
Note 2: I’m not even on the list, after hitting my ATL (excluding my first month or so here)


There, my last smerit has gone.
Well deserved.
You made a sense of your personal text.


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 12, 2019, 07:15:46 PM

I also read all posts from all Chipmixer participants (including you) because Chipmixer participants are considered to be the best posters. Chipmixer signature is like a batch[1] badge now and helps in earning merits faster, so to ranking...



Nobody with any kind of  knowledge here considers chipmixer spammers here to be the best posters.

Chipmixer sig spammers are predominantly SHIT POSTERS and low functioning CORRUPT dregs. There are a tiny handful of reasonable Chipmixer spammers but the best posters on this forum would NEVER SPAM SIGS here.

Just because you likely are far too low functioning to realize most of their spurious garbage is net negative that is no reason to feltch your garbage all over the place. We have challenged plenty of chipmixer sig spammers to present their best original thought inspiring posts for analysis. Most ran away. They are just backscratching corrupt scum who lodge themselves on DT and cycle merit and trust inclusions.

@ iamsenko or whatever...

CHANGE THE TITLE if you are not really going to make it AFTER the merit system. You can not say AFTER the merit system if you were airdropped ANY merit.

You need to have joined AFTER THE MERIT system right? or did not receive ANY airdropped merit.

Although it is hilarious to see SELF CYCLED noob "Legendary" or " heros" seemingly dreaming they are some kind of superior breed ....haha you do realize MOST of the REAL achievements here were made by premerit legends that have hardly any of this crappy cycled merit? Look at all the big developers, REAL scam hunters, etc  all old members that hardly have any cycled merits.

I mean how SLOW and RETARDED would you have to be to not find out about bitcoin for the first 7+ years hahah.....

self made = dumb shits who were too stupid to realize bitcoin existed for years on end. ...... well done dummies. Thanks for coming 7 years after the party started just to claim only you guys are the smartest and best because now you can feltch, beg and spam to get some bitcoin dust that we all got for 100x less.

RULZ legends

LULZ legends



Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: mikeywith on November 13, 2019, 12:14:54 AM
I mean how SLOW and RETARDED would you have to be to not find out about bitcoin for the first 7+ years hahah.....

To many people , bitcoin does not revolve around this very forum, I do not claim to have known bitcoin 1 week after Satoshi published the bitcoin whitepaper,it took me many years to get involved, but i have learned about bitcoin long before i sign up to the forum, I used to search for many things , mostly mining related and I was always directed to this forum, i, like many others , used to get what I wanted and leave, i was more into facebook and telegram groups, and to be honest the forum with this old SMF style was never tempting enough.

In fact even when I decided to sign up to bitcointalk, it was mainly for the market place and nothing else, but then suddenly and out of nowhere, i started to be active here and decided to give back, i contributed a lot to the forum specially the mining section, never bothered applying for any signature campaign for almost a year despite having earned tons of merit.

I also think what's worse than not knowing about bitcoin early enough, is knowing about it and not owning enough of it  ::),  if you knew bitcoin when it was pretty cheap and you don't own a lambo by now, then you don't have the right to mock new comers.


I am sure I saw your name in my list!
 :'(

What list is that? i haven't received any notification regarding that  :'(


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: fillippone on November 13, 2019, 12:28:49 AM



I am sure I saw your name in my list!
 :'(

What list is that? i haven't received any notification regarding that  :'(

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5200519.msg53050251#msg53050251

I thought you were referring to that list in your previous comment.


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: suchmoon on November 13, 2019, 12:30:52 AM
The point being that Chipmixer for sure has good posters, but looking at it from a broader view, they represent 16% of the top merited over the past 30 days – the same as CryptoTalk (a larger perspective may change the ratios, but the 30 day one is pretty easy to do). 40% of the list don’t have a campaign signature.

At last count, Cryptotalk had nearly 10 times as many members as Chipmixer.

Last 30 days are heavily skewed by the art contest. I don't know if that favors Chipmixer or Cryptotalk though.


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: mk4 on November 13, 2019, 01:30:39 AM
What I wanted to say is that for some newbies and old members it may take a long time to rank to Legendary. Even some members will never reach that rank because either they will retire from this forum or will be dead.

Yeah, sure it is difficult. 1000 merits is definitely no joke. But I'm referring to mostly to those users have been registered for more than 2 years and with like 300+ activity points, and are complaining on how impossible it is to earn merit even though 90% of their posts are on bounty/airdrop threads. I get your point though.


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 13, 2019, 08:07:28 PM
I mean how SLOW and RETARDED would you have to be to not find out about bitcoin for the first 7+ years hahah.....

To many people , bitcoin does not revolve around this very forum, I do not claim to have known bitcoin 1 week after Satoshi published the bitcoin whitepaper,it took me many years to get involved, but i have learned about bitcoin long before i sign up to the forum, I used to search for many things , mostly mining related and I was always directed to this forum, i, like many others , used to get what I wanted and leave, i was more into facebook and telegram groups, and to be honest the forum with this old SMF style was never tempting enough.

In fact even when I decided to sign up to bitcointalk, it was mainly for the market place and nothing else, but then suddenly and out of nowhere, i started to be active here and decided to give back, i contributed a lot to the forum specially the mining section, never bothered applying for any signature campaign for almost a year despite having earned tons of merit.

I also think what's worse than not knowing about bitcoin early enough, is knowing about it and not owning enough of it  ::),  if you knew bitcoin when it was pretty cheap and you don't own a lambo by now, then you don't have the right to mock new comers.


I am sure I saw your name in my list!
 :'(

What list is that? i haven't received any notification regarding that  :'(

Thanks mikey for helping support what we said.

Bitcoin did revolve around this forum 7yrs ago pretty much and this is still really the center of the crypto movement. Your story is rather peculiar..so although you knew about bitcoin years ago, you did not buy it when it was cheap because you didn't want to join the board and contribute then but rather you just wanted to " get what you want and leave"?  back then(whilst others were single handed forcing huge scams to offer 2 000 000 000 usd compensation offers to the board or fighting to introduce fair launch protocols or making people into millionaires) but now you decided to join and spam chipmixer based on some gamed and cycled merit score then they ( real achievers)  can not point out the obvious that most noobs are fools that have achieved nothing except ass licking scammers here and proving they will support their scamming  actions and make excuses for their undeniably financially dangerous behaviors.......for what reason exactly??  As we said most "self made" legends are non achieving scammer supporting sig spamming moronic scum bags.  SELF MADE = nothing burger noob. Of course feel free to prove us wrong. We are not aiming that at you specifically but since once again you wish to wade in and make some strange comments then you have involved yourself.

If people have been here on this forum since 2012 ish (or known about bitcoin for years on end, but didn't join due to the forum layout haha) then yes if they are not multi millionaires  then certainly they are fools that were either not true believers or have been suckered into stupid alt icos that parted them from their btc.

There are a handful of people that have moved up via the merit rankings near hero /legend that are not total and utter dregs and scammer supporting ass lickers ( only the scammers that give them merits and are on DT of course) but that would be a tiny tiny fraction of those on meta board if any at all.

The big achievers here that made any real differences, are the pre merit legend/heros or were here long before the moronic merit system was sharted upon the members. You didn't realize bitcoin/crypto was a thing and didn't get involved until after the merit system = lol

Good to see suchmoon still making a total idiot of her revolting self  After stating " good poster" and " bad poster" are meaningless terms without strict definition and criteria. Is still here making posts that are conflating high merit with good post. NOW SPAMMING CHIPMIXER too haha  no lambos for suchmoon it seems, perhaps a lambo tractor could handle her anyway. Keep spamming and saving your bitcoin dust suchmoon.

When is the thread title being changed ? you can't be " after" the merit system if you had air dropped merits can you?

The largest achievers here are PRE MERIT LEGENDS many of which have hardly ANY cycled merits,compared to the non achieving ass feltching noob lengeds/heros in meta that willingly and knowingly support scammers here.




Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: TheBeardedBaby on November 28, 2019, 04:14:37 PM
There are yet no Legendariles, after the last 14 days cycle update. I'll keep an eye on the suchmoon's list and will update if there is any change.


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: TheBeardedBaby on December 20, 2019, 04:52:13 PM
No legendary yet, but we entered the competition now, some of us crossed the activity line for ranking up all we have now is just luck.
I would like to aks suchmoon to update the list, I prefer their format :)


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: o_e_l_e_o on January 01, 2020, 11:11:21 AM
Seems I won the activity requirement lottery, and ranked up on just my second eligible activity increase (784, 798).

Happy new year to me :P


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: fillippone on January 01, 2020, 01:12:59 PM
Seems I won the activity requirement lottery, and ranked up on just my second eligible activity increase.(786, 798).

Happy new year to me :P
You have long been a legendary member of the forum. Now the tag only confirms that. Grinding activity is way more easy and boring than grinding merits.
Congratulations.

Edit: according to BPIP.org your promotion has the positive side effect to make me the second highest merited hero member after ddmrddmr. Nice.


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system.
Post by: TheBeardedBaby on January 01, 2020, 02:30:41 PM
Seems I won the activity requirement lottery, and ranked up on just my second eligible activity increase.(786, 798).

Happy new year to me :P

Whoohoo, congratulations. That was a great new year surprise. I'll update the OP with this great news tomorrow.
Wish you all a great and successful new year.


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - we have the first Legendary - o_e_l_e_o, Congrat!
Post by: GazetaBitcoin on January 01, 2020, 08:20:50 PM
Congrats oeleo! You achieved something almost impossible. Like unobtanium :)

And you totally deserved it!


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - we have the first Legendary- o_e_l_e_o, Congrats!
Post by: TheBeardedBaby on January 14, 2020, 07:30:57 PM
No one on the second place yet. Oeleo had incredible luck, who do you think will be the next one to rank up to Legendary? I preferr the suchmoon's list from my second post (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5200519.msg53046543#msg53046543)


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - we have the first Legendary- o_e_l_e_o, Congrats!
Post by: TheBeardedBaby on January 15, 2020, 09:34:39 AM
Woohoo, we have another Legendary today. Congrats to joniboini (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1275282). A well deserved Legendary title! Congrats again!
Who will be next ?

The OP is updated :)


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - we have the second Legendary-joniboini, Congrats!
Post by: tranthidung on January 18, 2020, 11:58:21 AM
As discussed in PMs, I have it for you, iasenko. Please let me know if you need something more.

Brandnew / newbie to legendary (1000+ emerits)
Code:
     +-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
     | rank_emerit    userid              username   emerit     rank_initial   rank_2020w2   activity_2020w2 |
     |-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  2. |           5   1582324              DdmrDdmr     3186   Old-era Newbie   Hero Member               742 |
  3. |           9   1852120            fillippone     2193   Old-era Newbie   Hero Member               588 |
  7. |          13   2033515             mikeywith     1806   Old-era Newbie   Hero Member               658 |
  8. |          15   2143453                 1miau     1734   Old-era Newbie   Hero Member               616 |
  9. |          19   1878246         abhiseshakana     1541   Old-era Newbie   Hero Member               658 |
     |-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
 11. |          25   1138727                VB1001     1451   New-era Newbie    Sr. Member               476 |
     |-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
 16. |          38   2003859           DireWolfM14     1235   Old-era Newbie   Hero Member               644 |
 17. |          39   1554927              bitmover     1226   Old-era Newbie   Hero Member               728 |
 22. |          52   1825672            morvillz7z     1144   Old-era Newbie   Hero Member               616 |
 23. |          54   1574226             mu_enrico     1114   Old-era Newbie   Hero Member               756 |
 24. |          55   1292764           tranthidung     1113   Old-era Newbie   Hero Member               700 |
 25. |          56   1855828             taikuri13     1110   Old-era Newbie   Hero Member               714 |
 26. |          58   1827294              Husna QA     1099   Old-era Newbie   Hero Member               700 |
 27. |          59   1433865         witcher_sense     1086   Old-era Newbie   Hero Member               770 |
 28. |          60   1980983       Coolcryptovator     1074   Old-era Newbie   Hero Member               672 |
     |-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
 29. |          62    976210               nullius     1064   Old-era Newbie   Full Member               210 |
     |-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
 30. |          63   1982152       lovesmayfamilis     1061   Old-era Newbie   Hero Member               560 |
     |-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
 34. |          68   1180530   theyoungmillionaire     1011   Old-era Newbie    Sr. Member               376 |
     +-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Member to Legendary (990+ emerits)
Code:
     +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
     | rank_emerit    userid                 username   emerit   rank_initial   rank_2020w2   activity_2020w2 |
     |--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
 10. |          20   1291828                  iasenko     1507         Member   Hero Member               812 |
 19. |          46   1339716              coinlocket$     1160         Member   Hero Member               798 |
 21. |          51   1169179               BitCryptex     1144         Member   Hero Member               812 |
 32. |          66   1052091   CryptopreneurBrainboss     1021         Member   Hero Member               686 |
     +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Full Member to Legendary (900+ emerits)
Code:
     +-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
     | rank_emerit    userid    username   emerit   rank_initial   rank_2020w2   activity_2020w2 |
     |-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
 12. |          26    897509     xtraelv     1449    Full Member   Hero Member               924 |
 15. |          33   1177936      Veleor     1306    Full Member   Hero Member               840 |
 18. |          41   1051955    roycilik     1212    Full Member   Hero Member               938 |
 35. |          70    239406   Toxic2040      985    Full Member   Hero Member               714 |
 37. |          72   1039323      Goran_      949    Full Member   Hero Member               840 |
     +-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Sr. Member to Legendary (750+ emerits)
Code:
     +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
     | rank_emerit    userid            username   emerit   rank_initial   rank_2020w2   activity_2020w2 |
     |---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
 13. |          28   1000199    krogothmanhattan     1375     Sr. Member   Hero Member               994 |
 20. |          49    188198               Piggy     1157     Sr. Member   Hero Member               784 |
 31. |          64    879277   Coding Enthusiast     1057     Sr. Member   Hero Member               728 |
 48. |          93   1018510           Blacknavy      814     Sr. Member   Hero Member               966 |
     +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - we have the second Legendary-joniboini, Congrats!
Post by: TheBeardedBaby on January 29, 2020, 12:09:29 PM
I got an update a few days ago from Suchmoon as well.
No new Legednaries this week at least til now. Let's see when everyone make a posts in the new period :)
~
Here is the list. There are some issues (you'll notice negative starting merits) due to the art and/or caption contests
UserId |UserName              |TsRegistered|Position     |PostCount|Activity|Merit|Airdropped|
-------|----------------------|------------|-------------|---------|--------|-----|----------|
1582324|DdmrDdmr (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1582324)              |  2018-01-04|Hero Member  |4112     |742     |3237 |         0|
1852120|fillippone (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1852120)            |  2018-02-18|Hero Member  |2942     |588     |2274 |         0|
3      |satoshi (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3)               |  2009-11-19|Founder      |575      |364     |2398 |       250|
2033515|mikeywith (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2033515)             |  2018-04-14|Hero Member  |3457     |658     |1839 |         0|
2143453|1miau (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2143453)                 |  2018-05-21|Hero Member  |1928     |616     |1746 |         0|
1878246|abhiseshakana (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1878246)         |  2018-02-25|Hero Member  |1857     |658     |1572 |        -2|
1291828|iasenko (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1291828)               |  2017-11-07|Hero Member  |3337     |812     |1563 |        10|
1138727|VB1001 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1138727)                |  2017-09-04|Sr. Member   |2754     |476     |1480 |         0|
897509 |xtraelv (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=897509)               |  2016-09-09|Hero Member  |2223     |924     |1557 |       100|
1000199|krogothmanhattan (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1000199)      |  2017-05-11|Hero Member  |7319     |994     |1625 |       250|
1177936|Veleor (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1177936)                |  2017-09-29|Hero Member  |1778     |840     |1424 |        99|
2003859|DireWolfM14 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2003859)           |  2018-04-04|Copper Member|2253     |644     |1271 |         0|
1554927|bitmover (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1554927)              |  2017-12-31|Hero Member  |3869     |728     |1250 |         0|
1051955|roycilik (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1051955)              |  2017-07-02|Hero Member  |2289     |938     |1347 |        98|
1292764|tranthidung (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1292764)           |  2017-11-08|Hero Member  |3092     |700     |1213 |         0|
1574226|mu_enrico (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1574226)             |  2018-01-03|Copper Member|1948     |756     |1176 |         0|
1339716|coinlocket$ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1339716)           |  2017-11-22|Hero Member  |5458     |798     |1180 |        10|
188198 |Piggy (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=188198)                 |  2013-12-12|Hero Member  |4629     |784     |1407 |       250|
1825672|morvillz7z (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1825672)            |  2018-02-11|Hero Member  |1479     |616     |1151 |         0|
1169179|BitCryptex (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1169179)            |  2017-09-25|Hero Member  |1529     |826     |1157 |        10|
1855828|taikuri13 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1855828)             |  2018-02-19|Hero Member  |3553     |714     |1127 |         0|
976210 |nullius (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=976210)               |  2017-03-29|Copper Member|1017     |210     |1120 |         0|
1827294|Husna QA (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1827294)              |  2018-02-12|Hero Member  |1563     |700     |1117 |         0|
879277 |Coding Enthusiast (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=879277)     |  2016-07-18|Hero Member  |733      |733     |1348 |       249|
1433865|witcher_sense (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1433865)         |  2017-12-14|Hero Member  |2015     |770     |1097 |         0|
1980983|Coolcryptovator (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1980983)       |  2018-03-28|Copper Member|4016     |672     |1095 |         0|
1982152|lovesmayfamilis (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1982152)       |  2018-03-28|Hero Member  |1549     |560     |1078 |        -1|
1052091|CryptopreneurBrainboss (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1052091)|  2017-07-02|Hero Member  |2344     |686     |1033 |         9|
1180530|theyoungmillionaire (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1180530)   |  2017-10-01|Sr. Member   |376      |376     |1011 |         0|




Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - we have the second Legendary-joniboini, Congrats!
Post by: coinlocket$ on January 29, 2020, 11:04:26 PM
The race is on who will be the next one ;D

My sixth sense says... mu_enrico.


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - we have the second Legendary-joniboini, Congrats!
Post by: mu_enrico on January 31, 2020, 05:34:15 AM
^Lol, I'm flattered with your "sixth sense" mate, however, don't forget that there is a member who already has 952 activities. My bet will go to @roycilik.

Except I get extremely lucky and he gets extremely unlucky, the scenario of I ranks up before him would never happen. Anyway, If your prediction is somehow correct, it would be a nice joke in the Indonesian community ;D (RIP @roycilik)


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - we have the second Legendary-joniboini, Congrats!
Post by: roycilik on January 31, 2020, 06:51:12 AM
@mu_enrico
https://i.ibb.co/StpX7tX/arrrrrrrr.gif (https://ibb.co/dPy0JP0)


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - we have the second Legendary-joniboini, Congrats!
Post by: TheBeardedBaby on January 31, 2020, 07:48:32 AM
Seems like we can make a competition who will be the next Legendary. I don't know what the prize will be tho, but it can be fun to get some predictions. I don't know if it is a problem to post predictions here or make a new thread in a more appropriate section. I guess if we make it just for fun without any special reward this thread should be fine :)


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - we have the second Legendary-joniboini, Congrats!
Post by: fillippone on January 31, 2020, 09:37:05 AM
Seems like we can make a competition who will be the next Legendary. I don't know what the prize will be tho, but it can be fun to get some predictions. I don't know if it is a problem to post predictions here or make a new thread in a more appropriate section. I guess if we make it just for fun without any special reward this thread should be fine :)
Derailing this thread once again.
Prediction: krogothmanhattan      
Reason: I am lazy


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - we have the second Legendary-joniboini, Congrats!
Post by: TheBeardedBaby on February 01, 2020, 07:58:17 PM
There we have another Legendary - krogothmanhattan.
Truly deserved ranking up. One of the real assets of the collectable section.
Seems like fillippone was right, well congrats to you as well. :)


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - we have the second Legendary-joniboini, Congrats!
Post by: ChiBitCTy on February 02, 2020, 01:13:38 PM
There we have another Legendary - krogothmanhattan.
Truly deserved ranking up. One of the real assets of the collectable section.
Seems like fillippone was right, well congrats to you as well. :)

As deserving as they come.

Btw ..I would be willing to bet I beat over a handful of users on the list :)  Your day is near my friend and will be well deserved!


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - we have the second Legendary-joniboini, Congrats!
Post by: TheBeardedBaby on February 12, 2020, 08:57:43 AM
There we have another Legendary - krogothmanhattan.
Truly deserved ranking up. One of the real assets of the collectable section.
Seems like fillippone was right, well congrats to you as well. :)

As deserving as they come.

Btw ..I would be willing to bet I beat over a handful of users on the list :)  Your day is near my friend and will be well deserved!

Thanks man, you are also coming closer to get into the Legendary field, and you are here since 2016 which makes you much more Legendary then me ;)

This week round started so for now no changes, Let's stay tuned to see who will be the next after krogothmanhattan.
I bet on BitCryptex this time.

This can be tunred into a betting game and have nice pottential. Anyone is free to make a betting competition. :)


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - another Legendary-krogothmanhattan, Congrats!
Post by: Pffrt on February 12, 2020, 09:10:09 AM
1st. o_e_l_e_o  (http://https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1188543)- Ranked up at 798 Ativity (01.01.20)
The link is not working because yo have missed : after https


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - we have the second Legendary-joniboini, Congrats!
Post by: fillippone on February 12, 2020, 09:14:49 AM
There we have another Legendary - krogothmanhattan.
Truly deserved ranking up. One of the real assets of the collectable section.
Seems like fillippone was right, well congrats to you as well. :)

As deserving as they come.

Btw ..I would be willing to bet I beat over a handful of users on the list :)  Your day is near my friend and will be well deserved!

Thanks man, you are also coming closer to get into the Legendary field, and you are here since 2016 which makes you much more Legendary then me ;)

This week round started so for now no changes, Let's stay tuned to see who will be the next after krogothmanhattan.
I bet on BitCryptex this time.

This can be tunred into a betting game and have nice pottential. Anyone is free to make a betting competition. :)

My bet: roycilik
Reason: I am boring and lazy.

EDIT: Activity cycle just clocked at 1581470000 (human readable UTC timestamp: 2/12/2020 1:13:20), so I guess we will observe the winner sooner than later.



Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - another Legendary-krogothmanhattan, Congrats!
Post by: TheBeardedBaby on February 12, 2020, 09:26:34 AM
1st. o_e_l_e_o  (http://https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1188543)- Ranked up at 798 Ativity (01.01.20)
The link is not working because yo have missed : after https

Thanks, fixed it, actually there was an extra https:// in the link. This is what happnes when you try to edit long posts wiht a lot of formating on a phone.. with a broken screen :D (congrats, just gave you my last smerit, you got lucky too)

@fillippone you won the previuose one, maybe you gonna hit this one too and if that happnes, you better buy a lotto ticket :) (and don't forget me if you win the Millions :P)


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - another Legendary-krogothmanhattan, Congrats!
Post by: fillippone on February 12, 2020, 09:30:55 AM
1st. o_e_l_e_o  (http://https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1188543)- Ranked up at 798 Ativity (01.01.20)
The link is not working because yo have missed : after https

Thanks, fixed it, actually there was an extra https:// in the link. This is what happnes when you try to edit long posts wiht a lot of formating on a phone.. with a broken screen :D (congrats, just gave you my last smerit, you got lucky too)

@fillippone you won the previuose one, maybe you gonna hit this one too and if that happnes, you better buy a lotto ticket :) (and don't forget me if you win the Millions :P)
Nah..
If you had a monkey with a typewriter  (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_monkey_theorem)and such monkey typed the Odissey, would you bet on the same monkey to type the Hamlet?

EDIT: Changed titles to better adapt to anglophone culture.


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - another Legendary-krogothmanhattan, Congrats!
Post by: DdmrDdmr on February 12, 2020, 09:58:34 AM
These seem to have reached Legendary with the change of activity cicle (they were Heroes last Friday):

 Blacknavy (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1018510) (from Sr. Member Hero Member when Merit System kicked-off)
 Royse777 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=366632) (from Hero Member Sr. Member when Merit System kicked-off)

Not sure if you are still keeping the original criteria (from 0 or 10 merits). I don't think so.

Edit: @Iasenko, clarified the initial rank (with regards to rank on Merit System Kick-off)


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - another Legendary-krogothmanhattan, Congrats!
Post by: TheBeardedBaby on February 12, 2020, 10:16:52 AM
These seem to have reached Legendary with the change of activity cicle (they were Heroes last Friday):

 Blacknavy (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1018510) (from Hero Member)
 Royse777 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=366632) (from Sr. Member)
Wow, that's an interesting move :) The list should be extend more, looks like.  
From Sr.member (?!) how that is even possible...you need to really get like 501 Merit for like a two weeks and I don't really see in Royse's history anything like that. Mystery... Now I see what you ment :)

Quote
Not sure if you are still keeping the original criteria (from 0 or 10 merits). I don't think so.
No I really don't.  Now I prefer to make an observation over those who have a chance to rank up to legendary no matter what activity nor reg. date they have.
I already done my experiment with the ranking from my group ;)


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - another Legendary-krogothmanhattan, Congrats!
Post by: DdmrDdmr on February 12, 2020, 11:04:17 AM
<...>
I modified my prior post to contextualize the initial rank for each case (when the Merit System kicked-off).

The list I went through to find those two cases is this one:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1mD6cdsQNJ8dauTL-XLi8I0oDG5WBl0z0NeKzXTByNyw/edit?usp=sharing

The list is updates each Friday (Saturday at most), and provides information on all merited profiles.

I then added a filter to delimit the list to those that:
Rank = Hero Member
Merits >=1000
Activity >= 760 (one full activity period takes them up to 774, which is nearly there).

The result was of 87 candidates (*). I then clicked on each profile URL from the Google Sheet for those 87 cases, and spotted the two that had ranked-up with the change of cycle today.

(*) The list only contains merited profiles. There are potential profiles that may rank-up to Legendary, but have not earned any merits yet (i.e. initial airdrop of 1K merits). I do not track these.


Edit:
@DdmrDdmr, Royse himself admitted that he was a hero member, when merit was introduced.<...>
Correct, the Google Sheet link I provided did state that, but when I wrote the post I switched them around by mistake.


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - another Legendary-krogothmanhattan, Congrats!
Post by: akhjob on February 20, 2020, 09:23:03 AM
@DdmrDdmr, Royse himself admitted that he was a hero member, when merit was introduced.

Unlucky me that I was already a hero at that time :-P
It's such a privilege to be a Legendary from 0 merit.


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - another Legendary-krogothmanhattan, Congrats!
Post by: TheBeardedBaby on February 26, 2020, 08:54:29 AM
Today started a new round, let's see who is gonna be the lucky Legendary winner if anyone will rank this time. As my previous week prediction I still put my money on BitCryptex.
I check up on a few users, but some haven't posted yet.. so ... we wait.
Good luck everyone.


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - another Legendary-krogothmanhattan, Congrats!
Post by: mole0815 on February 26, 2020, 09:56:38 AM
We are soon entering in the period when if there was not a merit system people should rank up to Legendary.
That's why I'm making this list to see who will enter into the Rank Up Legendary Zone (RULZ) who have received already minimum 990  :)

why can't I play in this game? :P
i did not register before 03-12-2017 but with 12-12-2017 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1424178) it is only 9 days later... and I also started with 0 merits.
I was even the first zero to hero (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5126014.msg50408059#msg50408059) here ;D
and as already calculated in other place, it will happen in october at the very latest:

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Link to the Rank, Activity and Merit points calculator, v2  (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1khSA28Ab6miwyknp3JvStcL0Yu05SIbGBDZDKcOLO6s/)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Easy calculating your Activity based on your registration day. Basically for fun as just a few receive enough merit to rank up.

mole0815 / registriert: 12-12-2017 / 13.10.2020

but I hope to be among the selected ones sooner and to overtake all those listed here ;D



Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - another Legendary-krogothmanhattan, Congrats!
Post by: TheBeardedBaby on February 26, 2020, 10:21:36 AM
We are soon entering in the period when if there was not a merit system people should rank up to Legendary.
That's why I'm making this list to see who will enter into the Rank Up Legendary Zone (RULZ) who have received already minimum 990  :)

why can't I play in this game? :P

Of course you can, I'm actually planning to lock this thread and start clean, to monitor all those who are about to Rank up to Legendary.
The initial idea of this thread was only to follow those who register around me, and how many of them are close to the Legendary rank and at the end who will actually rank up. It already served it's purpose, that;'s why I'm planning to start from scratch.
Just I need some more free time and I'll do it if there is not already something like this :)


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - another Legendary-krogothmanhattan, Congrats!
Post by: mole0815 on February 26, 2020, 10:25:43 AM
Of course you can, I'm actually planning to lock this thread and start clean, to monitor all those who are about to Rank up to Legendary.
The initial idea of this thread was only to follow those who register around me, and how many of them are close to the Legendary rank and at the end who will actually rank up. It already served it's purpose, that;'s why I'm planning to start from scratch.
Just I need some more free time and I'll do it if there is not already something like this :)

was also not quite serious and no reproach. just stumbled over your thread and thought to myself 'hey since I fit in there too'.
and dear iasenko, you've got some activity ahead of me but I'll catch you up ;D


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - another Legendary-krogothmanhattan, Congrats!
Post by: TheBeardedBaby on February 26, 2020, 10:46:30 AM
and dear iasenko, you've got some activity ahead of me but I'll catch you up ;D

.. then I have to die  ;)


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - another Legendary-krogothmanhattan, Congrats!
Post by: mole0815 on February 26, 2020, 11:03:37 AM
and dear iasenko, you've got some activity ahead of me but I'll catch you up ;D

.. then I have to die  ;)

well, we certainly don't want to go that far.
that was meant differently. i'll get (overtake) you on the way to the legendary and not generally ;D
but enough OT now from my side and good luck to everyone on this little race here.


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - another Legendary-krogothmanhattan, Congrats!
Post by: TheBeardedBaby on February 26, 2020, 03:01:52 PM
Code:
name	rank	activity	merit	url
xtraelv Hero Member 966 1618 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=897509
roycilik Hero Member 966 1392 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1051955
aundroid Hero Member 924 1066 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1015954
Xal0lex Staff 910 1133 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1068464
Goran_ Hero Member 868 1093 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1039323
Veleor Hero Member 868 1451 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1177936
BitCryptex Hero Member 854 1245 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1169179
iasenko Hero Member 840 1650 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1291828
coinlocket$ Hero Member 826 1188 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1339716
mole0815 Staff 812 1013 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1424178
witcher_sense Hero Member 798 1179 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1433865
Piggy Hero Member 784 1407 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=188198
DdmrDdmr Hero Member 770 3353 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1582324
tvplus006 Hero Member 756 1070 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1311641
bitmover Hero Member 756 1281 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1554927
Coding Enthusiast Hero Member 742 1392 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=879277
taikuri13 Hero Member 742 1185 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1855828
tranthidung Hero Member 728 1235 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1292764
Husna QA Hero Member 728 1206 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1827294
Toxic2040 Hero Member 714 1085 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=239406
CryptopreneurBrainboss Hero Member 714 1057 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1052091
Coolcryptovator Hero Member 700 1150 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1980983

New list under construction :)


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - another Legendary-krogothmanhattan, Congrats!
Post by: AakZaki on February 26, 2020, 03:24:17 PM
I want to tell everyone that my colleague from Indonesia has reached Legendary rank today, roycilik (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1051955) with Activiti 980 and merit 1393.
I'm glad to see it, Congrats, friend.  I want to be like you another time.
he is a person who motivates me to be eager to contribute to this forum.


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - another Legendary-krogothmanhattan, Congrats!
Post by: tranthidung on February 26, 2020, 04:02:25 PM
The list should be updated after the next Friday merit data dump from theymos.
  • Activity: updated today.
  • Total merits: last Friday merit data, at 21feb2020 02:41:29 (forum time)

User name                     Rank                     Activity    Total Merits        
xtraelv (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=897509)Hero member9801618
aundroid (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1015954)Hero member9381066
Xal0lex (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1068464)Staff9101133
Goran_ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1039323)Hero member8821093
Veleor (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1177936)Hero member8681451
BitCryptex (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1169179)Hero member8541245
iasenko (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1291828)Hero member8541650
coinlocket$ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1339716)Hero member8401188
mole0815 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1424178)Staff8261013
witcher_sense (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1433865)Hero member8121179
Piggy (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=188198)Hero member7841407
DdmrDdmr (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1582324)Hero member7843353
tvplus006 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1311641)Hero member7701070
bitmover (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1554927)Hero member7701281
Coding Enthusiast (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=879277)Hero member7501392
taikuri13 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1855828)Hero member7421185
tranthidung (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1292764)Hero member7421235
Husna QA (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1827294)Hero member7421206
Toxic2040 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=239406)Hero member7141085
CryptopreneurBrainboss (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1052091)Hero member7281057
Coolcryptovator (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1980983)Hero member7001150


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - another Legendary-krogothmanhattan, Congrats!
Post by: TheBeardedBaby on February 27, 2020, 08:29:55 AM
I would like to thank tranthidung for the help with the list. Just a little edit here. Took away Xal0lex because he is already Legendary and added a border to those who have not entered yet in the ranking competition.

The list should be updated after the next Friday merit data dump from theymos.
  • Activity: updated today.
  • Total merits: last Friday merit data, at 21feb2020 02:41:29 (forum time)

User name                     Rank                     Activity    Total Merits        
xtraelv (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=897509)Hero member9801618
aundroid (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1015954)Hero member9381066
Goran_ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1039323)Hero member8821093
Veleor (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1177936)Hero member8681451
BitCryptex (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1169179)Hero member8541245
iasenko (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1291828)Hero member8541650
coinlocket$ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1339716)Hero member8401188
mole0815 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1424178)Staff8261013
witcher_sense (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1433865)Hero member8121179
Piggy (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=188198)Hero member7841407
DdmrDdmr (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1582324)Hero member7843353

Close to the required activity for Legendary.
User name                     Rank                     Activity    Total Merits        
tvplus006 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1311641)Hero member7701070
bitmover (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1554927)Hero member7701281
Coding Enthusiast (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=879277)Hero member7501392
taikuri13 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1855828)Hero member7421185
tranthidung (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1292764)Hero member7421235
Husna QA (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1827294)Hero member7421206
Toxic2040 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=239406)Hero member7141085
CryptopreneurBrainboss (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1052091)Hero member7281057
Coolcryptovator (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1980983)Hero member7001150

Things can change as there are 3 users without a post in the new 2weeks cycle:
aundroid , BitCryptex and Piggy.



Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - we have the second Legendary-joniboini, Congrats!
Post by: roycilik on February 28, 2020, 08:57:14 AM
~snip~
 it would be a nice joke in the Indonesian community ;D (RIP @roycilik)
I'm here, sorry sir ;D

I never thought I could reach Legendary rank, this is a long waiting
thanks to everyone who have supported me :)


@tranthidung, Don't forget about this guy mu_enrico (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1574226)


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - we have the second Legendary-joniboini, Congrats!
Post by: TheBeardedBaby on February 28, 2020, 09:04:20 AM
@roycilik Once again, congrats on being legedary it was deserved for sure, can you tell me the day you ranked up?

@tranthidung, Don't forget about this guy mu_enrico (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1574226)

It's my fault, I'll be updating the the list because I exclude the copper members. :(
Now it's time for the OP to be updated with you on the list :)


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - we have the second Legendary-joniboini, Congrats!
Post by: tranthidung on February 28, 2020, 12:22:22 PM
@tranthidung, Don't forget about this guy mu_enrico (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1574226)
Haha, sorry for that and congratulations you both, by the way.

I made that table with list of given usernames from @iasenko. There are available merit stats are dumped weekly by theymos so these stats will be updated easily. For stats on activities, it will be updated manually by checking case-by-case each 2 weeks. With the table and the narrow list of candidate Legendary members, it will be easier to update next 2-week periods.

I have interests to adjust the table this way. Not sure how @iasenko feel about it.  ;)

Already ranked up to Legendary.
User name                     Rank                     Activity    Total Merits        
o_e_l_e_o (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1188543)Legendary798n/a
joniboini (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1275282)Legendary812n/a
krogothmanhattan (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1000199)Legendary1008n/a
roycilik (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1051955)Legendary980n/a
* I will trace back and update merit stats on the day those guys ranked up to Legendary rank, if I can.



Minimum activity + for Legendary rank.
User name                     Rank                     Activity    Total Merits        
xtraelv (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=897509)Hero member9801618
aundroid (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1015954)Hero member9381066
Goran_ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1039323)Hero member8821093
Veleor (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1177936)Hero member8681451
BitCryptex (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1169179)Hero member8541245
iasenko (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1291828)Hero member8541650
coinlocket$ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1339716)Hero member8401188
mole0815 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1424178)Staff8261013
witcher_sense (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1433865)Hero member8121179
mu_enrico (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1051955)Hero member7981227
Piggy (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=188198)Hero member7841407
DdmrDdmr (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1582324)Hero member7843353


Close to the required activity for Legendary.
User name                     Rank                     Activity    Total Merits        
tvplus006 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1311641)Hero member7701070
bitmover (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1554927)Hero member7701281
Coding Enthusiast (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=879277)Hero member7501392
taikuri13 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1855828)Hero member7421185
tranthidung (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1292764)Hero member7421235
Husna QA (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1827294)Hero member7421206
Toxic2040 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=239406)Hero member7141085
CryptopreneurBrainboss (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1052091)Hero member7281057
Coolcryptovator (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1980983)Hero member7001150


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - another Legendary-krogothmanhattan, Congrats!
Post by: cabalism13 on February 28, 2020, 12:27:55 PM
...

I will soon be on that list...
In 3...
2...
1...
Alright...

(Just Dreaming...)
Still have 19 Days to Earn that 160 Merits.
Oh Holy Cat, May you please guide me into the correct path... AMeow.


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - another Legendary-krogothmanhattan, Congrats!
Post by: TheBeardedBaby on February 28, 2020, 12:47:22 PM
@tranthidung, Don't forget about this guy mu_enrico (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1574226)
Haha, sorry for that and congratulations you both, by the way.

I made that table with list of given usernames from @iasenko. There are available merit stats are dumped weekly by theymos so these stats will be updated easily. For stats on activities, it will be updated manually by checking case-by-case each 2 weeks. With the table and the narrow list of candidate Legendary members, it will be easier to update next 2-week periods.

I thoguth that I haven't include in the list the copper members but it tured out that the database file I got from @DDmrDDmr has some errors.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1mD6cdsQNJ8dauTL-XLi8I0oDG5WBl0z0NeKzXTByNyw/edit#gid=1547785466

Code:
user_id	name	       datecreated	 rank	    banned	posts	   activity	merit	MeritReceived	startedwith	meritsent	probableInitialRank	url
1574226 mu_enrico 03.01.2018 Legendary N 2039 784 1223 1223 0 599 Old Era Newbie https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1574226

According to the file ^ mu_enrico (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1574226) is Legendary but in the reality, he is still a Hero, so I have to trun to @DDmr for help.


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - another Legendary-krogothmanhattan, Congrats!
Post by: GazetaBitcoin on February 28, 2020, 12:55:40 PM
I think mu_enrico is considered Legendary as he already obtained the necessary merits for being Legendary, thus it is only a matter of time until he'll receive the rank. Meaning to reach also the required activity.


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - another Legendary-krogothmanhattan, Congrats!
Post by: TheBeardedBaby on February 28, 2020, 12:59:24 PM
I think mu_enrico is considered Legendary as he already obtained the necessary merits for being Legendary, thus it is only a matter of time until he'll receive the rank. Meaning to reach also the required activity.

No, you haven't been following this thread looks like. I am listing everyone who is between 775-1030 activity enough merit and haven't ranked up to Legendary and it's like a competition who is going to be next. So the list shows the real current rank.

Oh I understand. Sorry, I thought something else. My bad.

It's OK ;)


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - another Legendary-krogothmanhattan, Congrats!
Post by: GazetaBitcoin on February 28, 2020, 02:03:43 PM
Oh I understand. Sorry, I thought something else. My bad.


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - another Legendary-krogothmanhattan, Congrats!
Post by: DdmrDdmr on February 28, 2020, 02:46:25 PM
<…>
Code:
user_id	name	       datecreated	 rank	    banned	posts	   activity	merit	MeritReceived	startedwith	meritsent	probableInitialRank	url
1574226 mu_enrico 03.01.2018 Legendary N 2039 784 1223 1223 0 599 Old Era Newbie https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1574226

According to the file ^ mu_enrico (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1574226) is Legendary but in the reality, he is still a Hero, so I have to trun to @DDmr for help.
Yep, that case and a few others are not trivial to derive, since their profile states they are Copper Members without displaying the rank (you need to go to a post of theirs to the real rank). I can derive the proper rank for most Copper Members (have done so for a while), but those with merits and minimum activity for Legendary need a bit more (manual) work (only on these Copper Member cases). I think I've got the Copper Members all correct now.

I’m also trying to do that with all non-standard ranks (i.e. staff, etc.), and have succeded for the most, but again a few need manual supervision and there are a few I still need to review over the coming days to get it right. When I succeed, there should be no non-regular ranks displayed (there are still a few I need to look into later on).


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - another Legendary-krogothmanhattan, Congrats!
Post by: TheBeardedBaby on March 06, 2020, 02:33:06 PM
<…>
Code:
user_id	name	       datecreated	 rank	    banned	posts	   activity	merit	MeritReceived	startedwith	meritsent	probableInitialRank	url
1574226 mu_enrico 03.01.2018 Legendary N 2039 784 1223 1223 0 599 Old Era Newbie https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1574226

According to the file ^ mu_enrico (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1574226) is Legendary but in the reality, he is still a Hero, so I have to trun to @DDmr for help.
Yep, that case and a few others are not trivial to derive, since their profile states they are Copper Members without displaying the rank (you need to go to a post of theirs to the real rank). I can derive the proper rank for most Copper Members (have done so for a while), but those with merits and minimum activity for Legendary need a bit more (manual) work (only on these Copper Member cases). I think I've got the Copper Members all correct now.

I’m also trying to do that with all non-standard ranks (i.e. staff, etc.), and have succeded for the most, but again a few need manual supervision and there are a few I still need to review over the coming days to get it right. When I succeed, there should be no non-regular ranks displayed (there are still a few I need to look into later on).


Do you have the raw version of the file with all those Copper Members? Maybe I can just filter them based on the copper rank who have the needed Activity and received merit and go trough the list. Everyone with merit over 1000 with + at least 500 received merit should have been a Hero when the merit system kicked in, it should be easy to check. This can be applied also to the other ranks like Staff.


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - another Legendary-krogothmanhattan, Congrats!
Post by: DdmrDdmr on March 06, 2020, 02:49:20 PM
<...>
There should be no need now. The rank now shows the regulars ranks for all profiles on the file I publish along with the Dashboard update. If, on the other hand,we still want to see on that file the original rank that is really shown on the profile (I.e. copper member, staff, etc.), I can add a column with this info later on.


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - another Legendary-krogothmanhattan, Congrats!
Post by: TheBeardedBaby on March 06, 2020, 02:53:03 PM
<...>
There should be no need now. The rank now shows the regulars ranks for all profiles on the file I publish along with the Dashboard update. If, on the other hand,we still want to see on that file the original rank that is really shown on the profile (I.e. copper member, staff, etc.), I can add a column with this info later on.

No, no need to add a column just for this, the real ranks are important the sub ranks are just for information and as you said you can always check them in the user's profile page.
Thanks, I was thinking drop some work off your back if you are doing it solely for me, but if it's already done, it's OK. BTW if you need any help with anything, just shoot a PM, i'll be glad to help you out :)


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - another Legendary-krogothmanhattan, Congrats!
Post by: DdmrDdmr on March 06, 2020, 03:50:14 PM
<...>
I added them anyhow to the end of the file (last two columns called "Copper" and "Original Rank"). No worries; having made the adjustments, and it only takes me an additional minute or two extra per week. Piece of cake.


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - another Legendary-roycilik , Congrats!
Post by: TheBeardedBaby on March 25, 2020, 08:40:27 AM
New round just have started. No new legendarily yet, but not everyone posted since the new round started.
Exciting... :)


And another round have started.. No luck for me agian.. I have to wait for two weeks again. :(


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - another Legendary-roycilik , Congrats!
Post by: DdmrDdmr on March 25, 2020, 05:41:29 PM
I went through a bunch of candidates briefly, and the only one I made this cycle is Goran_ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1039323), who’s made it to Legendary from Full Member (when the Merit System was introduced). He's active on the Russian local board.

Edit: Ok, he's not self-made, which is the scope here really (there are x2 more non self-made on their way).


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - another Legendary-roycilik , Congrats!
Post by: TheBeardedBaby on April 01, 2020, 12:33:43 PM
Users with activity of 775 and over are entering the Legendary rank competition.

user_id    name    datecreated    rank    posts    activity    merit    url  








1015954aundroid30.05.2017Hero Member26379661125link (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1015954)
1177936Veleor29.9.2017Hero Member18309101475link (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1177936)
1169179BitCryptex25.09.2017Hero Member15938961269link (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1169179)
1291828iasenko7.11.2017Hero Member36818821794link (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1291828)
1339716coinlocket$22.11.2017Hero Member57078681214link (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1339716)
1424178mole081512.12.2017Hero Member40358541121link (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1424178)
1433865witcher_sense14.12.2017Hero Member22858401292link (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1433865)
1574226mu_enrico03.01.2018Hero Member21378261270link (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1574226)
1580039asche04.01.2018Hero Member56398261010link (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1580039)
1582324DdmrDdmr04.01.2018Hero Member45498123607link (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1582324)
1311641tvplus00614.11.2017Hero Member20097981152link (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1311641)
1554927bitmover31.12.2017Hero Member40357981303link (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1554927)
188198Piggy12.12.2013Hero Member46287841407link (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=188198)
1855828taikuri1319.02.2018Hero Member39997841214link (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1855828)








1292764tranthidung8.11.2017Hero Member33267701260link (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1292764)
1827294Husna QA12.02.2018Hero Member17447701301link (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1827294)
879277Coding Enthusiast18.07.2016Hero Member7587581450link (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=879277)
904524ChiBitCTy01.10.2016Hero Member18807561045link (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=904524)
1052091CryptopreneurBrainboss02.07.2017Hero Member25857561089link (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1052091)
239406Toxic204005.02.2014Hero Member22017421168link (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=239406)
1980983Coolcryptovator28.03.2018Hero Member43147421170link (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1980983)
1283017masulum5.11.2017Hero Member18147281007link (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1283017)
1878246abhiseshakana25.02.2018Hero Member20807281706link (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1878246)
2033515mikeywith14.04.2018Hero Member38067282130link (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2033515)
2003859DireWolfM1404.04.2018Hero Member25677141496link (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2003859)
1825672morvillz7z11.02.2018Hero Member16156861225link (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1825672)
21434531miau21.05.2018Hero Member22176862007link (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2143453)
1852120fillippone18.02.2018Hero Member35546582768link (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1852120)
1982152lovesmayfamilis28.03.2018Hero Member15985881146link (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1982152)
1138727VB100104.09.2017Hero Member31235461746link (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1138727)

Source DdmrDdmr  :)


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - another Legendary-roycilik , Congrats!
Post by: fillippone on April 01, 2020, 04:14:23 PM
[<...>
Source DdmrDdmr  :)

Nice.
It would be useful to add "Legendary not earlier than:" column.
In that columnyou would find  the next activity cycle for member with activity>775 or minimum date with activity>775 for the others.
In my case that date would be 29Jul2020.


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - another Legendary-roycilik , Congrats!
Post by: TheBeardedBaby on April 01, 2020, 07:57:44 PM
[<...>
Source DdmrDdmr  :)

Nice.
It would be useful to add "Legendary not earlier than:" column.
In that columnyou would find  the next activity cycle for member with activity>775 or minimum date with activity>775 for the others.
In my case that date would be 29Jul2020.


I made a little update, which I was thinking to do but forgot when I post the list. Now those with 775 and above a separated :)

BTW We have another truly deserved Legend!! xtraelv (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=897509)! Amazing after so long time waiting :)
Took him away from the list and now he is on the OP :)

I went through a bunch of candidates briefly, and the only one I made this cycle is Goran_ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1039323), who’s made it to Legendary from Full Member (when the Merit System was introduced). He's active on the Russian local board.

Edit: Ok, he's not self-made, which is the scope here really (there are x2 more non self-made on their way).

I think I'll follow every rank up to Legendary no matter the initail rank. I not sure if I'll keep this thread or just lock it and make a new one following all Legednary rankups from scratch.
What do you guys think?


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - another well-deserved Legendary-xtraelv,Congrats!
Post by: GazetaBitcoin on April 01, 2020, 08:27:35 PM
Maybe start a new one, from scratch? That's what I would do.

Also, congrats xtraelv! Our greatest historian here is himself a legend!!!


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - another well-deserved Legendary-xtraelv,Congrats!
Post by: xtraelv on April 02, 2020, 02:47:04 AM
Maybe start a new one, from scratch? That's what I would do.

Also, congrats xtraelv! Our greatest historian here is himself a legend!!!


[<...>
Source DdmrDdmr  :)

Nice.
It would be useful to add "Legendary not earlier than:" column.
In that columnyou would find  the next activity cycle for member with activity>775 or minimum date with activity>775 for the others.
In my case that date would be 29Jul2020.


I made a little update, which I was thinking to do but forgot when I post the list. Now those with 775 and above a separated :)

BTW We have another truly deserved Legend!! xtraelv (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=897509)! Amazing after so long time waiting :)
Took him away from the list and now he is on the OP :)

I went through a bunch of candidates briefly, and the only one I made this cycle is Goran_ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1039323), who’s made it to Legendary from Full Member (when the Merit System was introduced). He's active on the Russian local board.

Edit: Ok, he's not self-made, which is the scope here really (there are x2 more non self-made on their way).

I think I'll follow every rank up to Legendary no matter the initail rank. I not sure if I'll keep this thread or just lock it and make a new one following all Legednary rankups from scratch.
What do you guys think?

Thank you.

Initially I never took too much notice of bitcointalk. Owlcatz helped me in the very beginning understanding some of the dynamics of the forum.
This led to some exciting scambusting with a huge amount of help by Cryptodevil.

Eddie13 made a comment a few years ago now that got me to take an interest in the history of Bitcointalk.

taikuri13 has helped me quite a bit with some of the historical threads.

Despite the rank up I don't quite feel that I am in the same category of OG legendarily like Suchmoon,  hilariousandco, BitcoinFX and qwk.

It is an honor to be able to chat with some of the people on here (many who I haven't mentioned and including some whose opinions I don't necessarily agree with).

Unfortunately I will not be posting much for some time. Despite the country being in full lockdown - the busineses I am involved with are classed as an essential service so will be focusing on a combined effort in trying to beat this pandemic. 


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - another well-deserved Legendary-xtraelv,Congrats!
Post by: TheBeardedBaby on April 02, 2020, 07:13:31 AM
~
Unfortunately I will not be posting much for some time. Despite the country being in full lockdown - the busineses I am involved with are classed as an essential service so will be focusing on a combined effort in trying to beat this pandemic.  

You are basically a Legend outside of the forum as well. Fighting the pandemic, risking your healt and life for helping the others one way or another can only show what person you are.
Again, you have my respect!
You are a big part of the history of this forum!


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - another well-deserved Legendary-xtraelv,Congrats!
Post by: DdmrDdmr on April 02, 2020, 08:16:03 AM
<…> What do you guys think?
I’d prefer the option that takes into account all starting points in terms of Rank (there is still space for the "PropableInitialRank" which is the starting rank when the Merit System kicked-in). That would drive the list to 106 non-banned candidates (or candidates-to-be): Hero Members with >=1K Merits and >= 500 Activity (this latter could be as is or higher).


Title: Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - another well-deserved Legendary-xtraelv,Congrats!
Post by: TheBeardedBaby on April 07, 2020, 08:10:26 AM
This thread has done his job and it's going in to the history. The new Observer thread (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5238533.0) is in the Reputation board and it's covering all the users, no matter of the registration date nor the airdropped merit. 
Locked.