Bitcoin Forum

For every bounty hunters who are tired of new bounty projects that ends up been a total garbage after they are listed on exchange pls do find yourself some time and do research on past bounty projects because the Exchange they used for IEO matters alot, that exchange is where they will list after bounty ends, i haven't seen a bounty project that get listed on Kucoin and Gate that is not profitable, in terms of good volume or even 2x+

I have learnt a lesson here again, have you? top exchange matters especially in this bear market, look at all the bounties listed on p2pb2b, exmarket etc  :D

Yeah, listing on established exchanges matters but how do you know a start up is going to be listed there immediately after the token sale of the bounty ends? AFAIK, no new projects, who did a bounty, got listed on Kucoin (I'm not familiar with Gate) immediately.

These new projects lists on new or lesser known exchanges because they both needed each other to survive in this tough crypto market. The demand of many bounty hunters to immediately list on exchanges doesn't help also in finding quality exchanges. You have to understand that it takes more time to build credibility/reputation before bigger exchanges will consider listing new coins/tokens.

;D What are you saying pal? Tokoin bounty that ends month ago was successful and they did their IEO on kucoin and now its over 8x in value, all bounty hunters who participate in the bounty are so lucky, this is yet another successful bounty after gowithmi on my list 

So you are saying if the bounty is not going to list in kucoin or gate.io don't join? You do realize that most times especially now that ieo is the order of the day, some bounty don't disclose the exchange the ieo will be held until when the bounty has ended or about to end, in this case what choice do you have when you realize the ieo exchange won't be on kucoin or gate as you mention? Will you reject your reward you have worked for!
I don't think this is a solution to all this because it is not always up to hunters to know the exchange on time.

Idax, Exmarket, p2pb2b, Probit, Latoken, dcoin, Exrates, Ddex, Coinlim, Vindax. If any bounty project you are hunting lists on any of these exchanges, then the price is as good as dead. On most occasions, projects don't do well on these market because of poor liquidity and thin exchange community

Projects that do IEO on p2pb2b are rarely successful even I often see projects failing like Wings, Mindblock and etc. There is no certainty because p2pb2b doesn't display sales that have been sold so I don't like seeing projects doing sales of IEO on p2pb2b like dead projects, moreover p2pb2b is reserved for fake volume exchanges.

You are missing a part, what about bounty projects that don't reveal where their presale will takes place until bounty project is over? its like how i promoted xcard bounty from arteezy and fundraising is not even close yet, c'mon sometimes you are just in the dark until the teams reveal which exchanges they decide to use

Wings is in trouble already, a project that seem to be the best one on my list this 2019, i warned them about p2pb2b but the teams talk as if i am the stupid one, now its hard for them to meet softcap and they have extended their token sales again till next year, i don't understand why developers are so stubborn

This is true and I based on my experience, coins being listed on top coins succeed more. As for me, it's better if we'll join projects who are aiming to have their coin listed on the top exchange. I have wasted my time on projects who didn't reveal their choice of exchange so I only have regrets in the end. An exchange really matter and it plays a big role in the growth of a certain coin.

As a bounty hunter i think it will be wiser to get info about the exchange a new bounty project plans to list or do their IEO to avoid wasting time in the end, cheap exchanges does nothing but cripple the life out of coins and tokens

As you said it’s correct when we are participating IEO investment or bounty exchange matters a lot . But kucoin is the good exchange also having good volume . I never find much loss on kucoin exchange but some least volume exchanges are like latoken even some low volume exchange IEO’s became disaster over investment as well as bounty reward . Some months of work paid few cents

IMHO! exchange really matters, agree! but how it was really matters if the bounty tokens are locked for 6 months to 1 year,? even if it was a well known exchange like you mention (kucoin Gate) it will end up nothing if was unlocked after 6 months or 1 year. as we all know price are not stable after it was listed it keeps falling day by day. Did you notice it most of the bounties nowadays has creating a new norms changing the rules after the bounty end, Locked the tokens and unlocked it when it was worthless! let me say that bounty hunting nowadays was changing a lot and it become worst. that's why before you join you can ask the team via its telegram about the bounty payment arrangement, if it was locked for a specific period its up to you if you join But for me i never join in those bounties  it just a waste of time.  

actually there are no good exchange nowadays when it comes bounties in my own opinion. .because based on my experience mostly  has fake volume and when the projects provide list of different exchanges the design seems almost the same which very suspicious to be honest.  For me probably they making a fake exchange and value of their coin as well just to convince investors easily perhaps this a new strategy of some scammer? ..

Listing in these exchanges can be important to you as a bounty hunter. Because being listed in a top exchange means better profit from an easy way. But someone who invests in his future will not agree with you, or if the developers are experienced. Everyone's ambition for money is the reason for today's market. We can slow down a little.

Indeed, getting listed on a good exchanges matters, it could help to boost the price or atleast have a stable price and volume or not dumped too deep. People tend to waste their effort on some worthless bounty campaign project, they don't really do some research first. When the outcome was not as what they expected, token/coin locked for a period time, or too long to get listed on exchange or the price dumps, at that time they were blaming the project team and all. Then again, they won't know the outcome until it ends and it's already too late to regret.

Getting listed in big exchanges really matters because it could create hype but only few projects have the ability to do so and most of the time they don't have a bounty campaign, if there's is a campaign that have confirmed listing on Binance, Kucoin, Gate.io etc. then I would be happy to join and promote that kind of project.

IEO is different now, they need to be listed with an exchange before they could go in with their offering.
It is not like the ICO which the offering comes first and they will take the funds out of it to pay for the listing.
Now, a lot of capital is needed before it happens.

It will be difficult to make a scam now since you will need a lot of money for a capital before you could even make some.

Just because you got lucky to participate in bounties that got listed in this exchanges don't mean that it should be a factor to look out for, it is a good thing to be in a successful bounty but most hunters can't do anything when the bounty didn't list on this exchange you mentioned,
Most project now are going for ieo in any exchange they can afford not necessarily must be kucoin or gate.io, so it's either you participate or not choice is yours.

Even if its listed in big exchange, it still does not guarantee that the bounty reward will be profitable as not all listed in such exchange are profitable.
However, I would agree that small exchange will struggle in the bear market because less people are interested to invest and therefore these people will also look for reputable exchanges with good liquidity.

Bounty hunters should be smart, they should not look on the promised fiat value in IEO as it could dump when listed in small exchange and bounty hunters will not get their expectation.

The reason of why the most bounty tokens are getting listed on shitty exchanges is that the teams are simply greedy. Nobody wants to pay large fees to get listed on a good exchange, when you can pay 0,1 BTC for exmarkets listing.

Most of them have also started telling plans to list their tokens to some of the exchanges they choose, but what you need to pay attention to is not to be easily fooled by the sweet promises they made. It's too easy to say "soon" to every plan they have, right? So, don't easily believe if they don't have good management from all sides, you need to reveal the truth through the development they have done.

Definitely top exchange always matter in every project because it's a very important thing to grow the project. Kucoin is a exchange it's really high liquidity exchange but random projects can't reach this exchange even a few projects was their endorsement IEO. I never seen Gate.io launched any IEO project.
Now most of the IEO will go some several exchanges namely p2pb2b,Exrates,Latoken and Probit.

Even there was a project that did not want to pay a single cent to list their token on the exchange, they claimed they will be listed on an exchange soon but asking us to vote their token to get listed on some random exchange. it is very hard to find a real project these days, these three months alone I could not find any good project that ran the IEO on good exchange.

You're right that the exchange matters. If it's being run by a very popular exchange then expect the wave of investors will come but if it's an exchange elsewhere that isn't really known, expect that project will turn out to be a failure afterward.
These exchanges has also their own way of choosing projects to have it on their list.

Thank you I have been on KuKoin only for the past month and I use it to transfer some of my old coins into ETH while I work on my startup. I have two utility coins that I plan to list but currently spend time building infrastructure which I think most altcoin enthusiasts and entrepreneurs fail to work on. They spend to much time hypothesizing and writing their white papers. I do not have a white paper but I have 50 marketing domains and jewelry to back my coins as well as all of the other coins in my wallet which back my utility tokens like an exchange does!

you are right on that. i still maintain that latoken exchange remains the worst exchange for IEOs and projects that have bounties. they never made any profitable sales. apart from harmony that sells on binance, Tokoin that sold out on kocoin and super zero on geto.io, i doubt if there is any other project that did bounty on any of these exchanges. Ferrum is another good one.

what about VidyCoin and the Tokoin project second that enter Exchange Kucoin and Gate, now to be listed on a large exchange is very difficult for those whose projects hold a bounty project, with the exception of IEO

I honestly don't see a lot of bounty of projects that would be holding IEOs gate and Kucoin exchanges, most bounty hunters just do not have a choice in the project's they participate in because it's mostly just a collection of terrible projects and you just have to select the one that has a prayer of surviving in this harsh market conditions, the IEO tokensale model is all but dead so there are not hundreds of them out there for us to choose from, bounty hunters are basically just trying to keep their heads down until things get better.

If you find it that way, you should expand your research of finding a good project. Maybe your ways of finding a good project is not effective, there are projects that you missed that's why you do noy know any other good projects that is currently or already succeeded on launching in the market.
There are still projects that is worth of our time, you just have to carefully find it and don't rush everything.

With popular exchanges comes great liquidity as the saying. It's all about money. Maybe you can think that paying popular exchange just for listing is a huge waste of money but then again, the coin that are listed on shit exchanges usually dying out within few months thus having a shorter life span.
Getting listed in popular exchanges you could also enjoy the benefit of publicity to thousands of people unlike in a low volume exchange where you are the subject of selling point to attract people but if both the project and exchanges are crappy who's gonna be attracted?
The price of getting listed into popular exchanges despite really expensive is quite relative to the project. If a project is raising huge amount of money it will be no problem but a little project will just dreaming of getting listed into Binance or many top exchanges.

Nothing is wrong with starting on small exchanges, big exchanges will drive a big hype on the project but what about other exchanges after? for example if a coin get listed on binance and later get listed on kucoin what difference will it bring? better to list on kucoin before binance

yes, it matters, absolutely!
list on the exchanges so bounty hunters (like me) could sell it, getting may after months of working.
:(( I'm really tired of being paid tokens that can't be sold.

To be listed on top exchanges is a good thing but the most important thing for me is how good and useful the project is before I invest or promote it because I'm one of those people whose target is a long-term goal as I believe that it is more profitable just like Bitcoin today.

It's not about the exchange. Here is an example: MZG conducted IEO on the COINBENE exchange - it is a very strong exchange. they even conducted a token sale on MOONBASE - money is being collected on this site very quickly. but the token price was destroyed anyway.

Not just about bounty only, it hovers all around the project itself and the community. Tell me a community which will be happy when a project with successful public sale lists on a terrible exchange. So I think it comes down to the team knowing the right thing to do, it isn't a must to list on top exchanges first, but a project can list on a moderate exchange then growing from there.
So yes, the exchange a token is listed on matters.

since the beginning of the year until now I think it's true that bounty only contains unclear projects and yes, I was fooled by projects that list in the market are not clear like exmarket, pp2pb2b it's just that there is one bounty there that survived because he did a listing on Other exchanges and the results I can say is pretty good, even though the volume is very low, at the moment I am still trying my luck to find an IEO project that will list in a large market, but until now I have not found it.

I do agree that the exchange a projects lists on does go a long way in determining how beneficial it will be to investors and bounty-hunters. However, listing a project on exchanges like Gate and Kucoin that have a very healthy trading volume requires a substantial amount of resources which may not be available to the project.

Exchange is a good fundamental for short term, but if you are HODLER, then you need to care more about the product, team, development activity and use case. And this is pretty hard, thats why bounty hunters immediately selling thier bounty tokens to prevent further loss.

small projects will not go into large exchanges, because these small projects do not have large costs to register on large exchanges, so if you want to support projects that will enter large exchanges you have to research the project capital, and find out how big the project investors

I think exchanges is the big fact for IEO project launch. Small project can't able to touch top exchanges because they have no enough budget to reach the expected exchanges. It's can be main reason almost 98% IEO lunched from small exchange that's why we can not find out our desired bounty project.

No matter how it I being seen, either from the eyes of a bounty Hunter or an investors, the exchange a token is listed on matters. Just imagine a project getting listed on Binance, the news alone is sufficient to cause hype which in turn will spike the price of the token. But that does not mean a project should spend all funds on exchanges, no, strategic planning matters and this is what defines most team and their capabilities. 

It is undeniable that the IEO held at a trusted exchange will get greater attention, both from investors and bounty hunters. Now, as a bounty hunter we also have to start adapting to this, don't just be interested because tokens or coins already exist in the market but the market is full of falsehoods. It's a good idea to also analyze the project in-depth, the allocation and bounty period, as well as our ability to maximize the opportunities of the campaign.

The exchange does matter but not as much as the quality of the project itself unless your intentions involves you quickly cashing out your bounty rewards. Supposedly you promoted a project that unknowingly to you was a shit projects and it gets listed on big exchange, the growth won't surpass first few months of been listed as such projects (coins) would be dump immediately it's secret gets uncovered.

On the other hand, if the project get listed on a less popular exchanges at first, that doesn't mean the project is dead considering the quality of the project is above the averages out there. Therefore, In as much as the exchange is important, the quality of the project also has to be put into consideration.

It is always essential in which exchange of the project is listed.

But what matters is how many tokens you make from the bounty. Because all bounty hunters can easily detect if a suitable project makes IEO on a good exchange, so I don't think you can earn good money just by doing facebook and twitter tasks.

In bounties, only translators make real money.

That is correct. IEOs done on bigger exchanges tend to have more success than those done in shady-looking, obscure low level exchanges. It is alway good to use discretion when picking out projects

The name of the exchange have an impact on hiw successful the project will be. But it doesn't mean that "lower" exchanges does not have profitable projects. It all matters if you research enough and took the job. How well you do in tasks also greatly affects your compensation so, aside from being smart which exchange and project, be also a good bounty hunter.

investors trust will bigger if projects could listing in reputable exchanges, they believed by listing in binance kucoin huobi it means this projects have good quality and worthed to buy. i am not recommended p2pb2b exchanges, or bounty listing on there.this is bad exchanges and many traders under estimate with it. if investors have no trust , it will not success in market.

I don't think it's a matter of mediocre top exchange or exchange. So the consideration is usually the use of the coin or token. Besides that, the season is not good or can be said to be bearish. Want to do anything rather difficult to raise the price of these coins this season.

Agree, A bounty hunter should be smart enough to identify the projects that won't disappoint them in the end, For example a bounty hunter joined a bounty campaign which is IEO and listed on a small exchange, It has a tendency no to be marketed well especially that the traffic on that exchange is low. If I'm a bounty hunter I will consider the exchange that the project team did their IEO first, to be honest, I have a bad experience on small exchanges  :(  

Yes the bounty with ieo launched in trade as gate io worked well I'm already participated in GoWithMi it's gone well ,Unfortunately there is not much

This is not true at all. This is obviously exaggerating things. Delisting of coins and pairs are happening in KuCoin and Gate and even on other top exchanges such as Binance. Therefore, this is never a guarantee. Simply said, it is never a guarantee that the coin being launched through an IEO on top exchanges will have a good volume and will give you 2x. Do not believe on this because this is not supported by hard facts. Try to look at the IEO projects more deeply rather than judge them on the basis of the exchange alone.

I think he mentioned the new ICO's who are listed on small exchange and became garbage after all and he stated that he didn't see any new coin who are listed on top tier exchange which is true since most of them right now is a garbage and actually I'm on top exchange listing since if they can afford to list on bigs then that means they can sustain there project for longterm. And definitely it's good to look on IEO which conducted on top exchange since the potential listing is big and provably we can earn more with them but we should scan and research among on which is best unto them.

At present, most of the projects have not been successful. The global economy can be responsible. In addition, the present year is not a good project when compared with the previous year.

This is the problem that we still encounter each project. Now that projects know we are smarter and they trick us in another way, they say they will IEO on the top 10 best exchanges on CMC. but ultimately it's IEO on IDAX, it's a blatant fraud exchange. We have no words to describe it, every job is now too difficult to make money. They just want to exploit our labor. It seems that the bounty market has ended, there are no good projects anymore.

Yes it really matter. Getting listed in such platforms specially those big one are an assurance for the users who are looking for a projects who are good, and will surely be fruitful. It became an assurance in a sense it is quite tough to get listed in those platforms when the project itself are futile, and incapable of having a place on those platforms.

very well this is a problem that we often encounter that utilizes the names of known exchanges of large volumes listed in CMC, I think in every project we have to look more closely at who the project owner and their team are and truly trusted to avoid fraud

we better not know the price of the project value but we have enough certainty to enter the best exchange 8)

maybe they give up with current condition. with low value in bounty reward its better to work on offline job .and we back to make it as side job only.  if we continue make bounty campaign as main job , we have no certainity with our monthly income . meanwhile we have many needs to fullfilled. big exchanges didnt guarantee project will success when listing on there. it depend on investors trust to developtment progress and product.

Listed is developer problem we just follow it. Bounty or airdrop is not profitable anymore and this time many developer only use it for promotion not built business. If developer continue project with good news, bonus and stake I believe exchange will accept them. This time survive is more important than high price, you can deny it but that's a fact.

It does indeed. I remember working on Bluenote (BNOW) project in January this year. The IEO listed on was Dobiexchange. That project is as good as dead right now. The CEO dumped and exit scam. Only a bot is running the Telegram group as I speak type right now

It doesn't guarantee anything if the company will just rely on it and they must support by creating a critical advertisements and other form of marketing so that they will earn more supporters, listing on big exchange will just create a hype and it will gone once it is landed there for so many days.

And also it's unfortunate for now to rely on bounty camps since we cannot earn even single cents and it's truly better to have this as side job to not get broke.

Of course, It is a top priority when we want to choose a bounty campaign to join. But as you can see, in the last two years, almost no or no projects have bounty that is listed on Binance (the only case I know is Harmony). It's a hard time for the whole market, and bounty hunters are no exception.

I think quality of project matters a lot although listing of good exchange cannot be ignored. Listing project on small exchanges do not attract much investors resulting price depreciation but listing on big exchanges even does not guarantee price appreciation. I think we should do a massive research before joining any bounty campaign. What is the project concept, how experienced is the team, how much is their participation and where are they going to list, everything instead of just looking for IEO on bigger exchanges.

their team had washed their hands since distribution, and they only left the bots as artificial sweeteners. I see this coin is no longer in Dobi.

many projects are very good and their community is very confident from the start, but they are bad at determining exchanges. In this case each project must be capable of both things that are mutually sustainable, or will be the same as other rotten coins. What I am surprised is that they chose not to enter the big exchange just because the ICO did not touch the hardcap?, they even doubted the miracle of the project they always communicated and there were no strong matters anymore like the initial proposal.

There is much sense in your write up, the exchange where these projects do IEO matters a lot. I remember doing SERO bounty which did IEO on Gate.io and TOKO VIP bounty which was on Kucoin spotlight, both were really successful and I benefited a lot from them. However, sometimes tokens listed on smaller exchanges for IEO still do well if the team has great vision, since they can still list on better exchanges after the IEO.

I'll go with projects use and partnerships. Exchange as long as its trusted and with good support it will be fine. I'm looking for projects that are backed or supported by many organisations or companies. Just dou le check if they really support that project as it can guarantee the projects quality and ability to withstand too much dump from investors.

Indeed exchanges matters a lot, if a token is listed in top or credible exchanges, there is every possibility of success and growth for the project . That is why most Developers should consider exchanges while the project is in it's inception. The likes of Binance,  kucoin,  Okex etc are good exchanges that should be considered though listing might be high.

This really matters and very important to every investors and every traders, as many investors nowadays are checking out first in which exchange they will list and confirm before they will totally invest, actually what they are doing now is they are waiting for the exchange, and waiting for it to dump and then buying the dip as they know once it is a good exchange meaning they will pump it.

Now is a very difficult time for bounty hunters. However, if we are very careful in researching projects, we can still make money on bounty campaigns.

2017 was the last year for bounties and other such offers. Back in those days, these methods really worked and revealed sufficient amount of tokens without investing money. Investors who could not invest made some good profit this way. But now things have changed. Most of the new projects are scams. Almost eighty percent of them fail to keep their promises. Best would be to invest directly.

doing research for the latest bounty coins must take time. but that will make us profit if the coins we get have good potential. do not believe in the ranking, keep careful analysis

Yes it matters.
That just means they have a lot of money before they even start.
So, it could be that there is already an investor backing them up or a shareholder.
You wont get anything yet from going thru an IEO. You will need to be listed.
If you can afford those exchange with big names then it might be a good sign.

Most of the time once a project get listed on a top exchanges then the price of their native tokens will increase for a short period of time especially if they hired a market maker which I think is included in top exchanges but after a few weeks or months of listing, the the price of their coin/token will gradually decrease if the team owners has no big update with the project so it's not olny about getting listed in top exchange but on how the project will perform during the next few months after the crowdfunding.

Performance of the project after token sale is extremely vital for the success of the project, this is very correct. Listing on a big exchange with huge trading volume is always a plus for the project, especially for price movement. Development progress is what maintains price of coins most times, even though it's not tenable in all situations. Take for instance, NPXS has been great with developments and also listed on top exchanges, still yet the price keeps dropping, this is so ironical.

I think getting listed in the top exchanger was a good thing in the past years but for not a lot of cryptocurrency or altcoins in the market was already garbage and almost all of them are turning into a scam,
a lot of altcoins in the market and ICO's are turning into a dead coin after the launch of the token after than listing in the market and then will not have any volume or trade history in the coming years.
I think getting listed in the top exchanger especially today was already useless for me having a great volume and transactions was more of an important thing in exchange the token could be listed in a popular exchange without having a good value or no value at all.

Obviously exchanges listing really matters for the every projects coming to the real world investment. We people need to check the project whether it is getting listed in good exchange or not.
We people here to learn the more projects how that we can find the good project to invest and work with. So use the forum to learn about it.

Of course exchanges matters alot in every project, who would want to trade on a small exchange with no volume. Top exchanges contributes their own qouta to the growth of any project owing to the fact they have high Volume as well as large user base. Also, from another perspective it doesn't mean that a team have to spend all funds on getting listed to top exchanges but have a  solid plan about exchanges matters; I have seen projects that started on small exchanges before moving to bigger ones and they are still doing good.

To me beeing listed on a 'big' exchange is just a data to be taken into account among others. However that does not mean so much.Tons of 'solid projects' listed on top exchanges ended up in the abyss.  ::)

even if the project did not immediately conclude some kind of agreement with a large exchange, this does not mean that it is a bad project. I saw a lot of projects that were not listed on Binance or Kucoin, but in the future, they grew very high in price

Even if it's not an IEO, good exchange always matters because an exchange would determine if the price of the token would do well, ofcourse nobody knows the exchange's that a bounty token might list in the future but the quality of a project would usually give you a clue about their standards, this is why I tend to prefer projects that has an Asian team because they tend to list in top exchanges after their sales but like we all knows those projects are very rarely conduct bounty campaigns.

Good afternoon everyone. Have you guys already heard of Binance Community Listing program? Main sense here is in letting community choose the most promising tokens from Binance DEX that will be listed on Binance

Haven’t thought of such a program, but you know, for sure sounds interesting and innovative. Are there any requirements that must be met?

Yes, of course. Trading volume, growth prospects, votes and much more. So only the best ones can proceed further

Gotcha. And are there already any favorites? I mean the tokens that both meet criteria and in high demand

Yeah, of course. I would say that the most promising these days is Verasity with their VRA token. What is great here - incredibly high trading volume, fully working platform with more than 700k active users and huge growth prospects

Sounds insane! You know, it seems that I have heard of Verasity already, but for sure will have a closer look shortly and get back with own thoughts. Thank you very much for your recommendation

I do not want 2x+, it is enough for me to maintain ICO price. Since the end of last year, I did not earn $200 from all the bounties I have participated in, apart from the previously known payments. But, this is not just about exchange. The projects themselves become slapdash after collecting some funds. The whitepaper, as thick as a book, was a fairy tale. Anyway, the exchange is not the key to success, if the project is good, the rest is not important.

To be frank, one of the most important things I do check about any project is the exchange it is listed on, then the volume. I think this is what really shows if the team is capable and have the right idea and strategies to drive the platform. A project which is seen as been good can't list on a bad exchange, it needs a good exchange not necessarily top exchanges to get started.

I am tired with bounty campaign manager why distributed coin after price dump on market, many bounty campaign manager try to get much profit for himself by distributing coin after have lower price. other way many investor on ICO or IEO give fault for bounty participants have make price down, excatly bounty campaign manager and advice team of IEO or ICO make price down on market.

At least that gives the more hopes rather than give up when you are not even starting to war. Exchange site is the only way for a project to be alive. if the project can attract a lot of buyers and that will actually give a long term live to the project but when it will be failed to attract the buyers and that will be dead instantly.
Top exchange sites is matter a lot. Big volume, a lot of users, trusted place with good security level. This matters a lot for any project because so many projects are wanna listing their service on the big exchange sites but they can't due to the various reasons. It's just not a data to be taken into the account. it's more than it.

errors that are often addressed to bounty hunters may be common, but with the global decline in cryptocurry it makes their burden lighter because decreases occur on all coins. and if they secure the proceeds of the sale, then in fact they are already a big profit

Getting listed on a reputable exchange is very important and more and more projects should make available information on what exchanges they will be seeking to list on prior to launching the token sale, and the better the exchange the more likely the project is of better quality

I have the same opinion as you. Some of the exchanges you mentioned are exchanges that are often used to list coins that have no value or even junk coins. like the p2pb2b exchange which has been indicated as a scam exchange. I have a few coins that were originally good projects, but after listing on the p2pb2p exchange, the coins became junk and delisted.

I am absolutely fine with any project plan to list on exchanges like kucoin, okex, huobi, gate or binance because they always have good trading volume, i know its not easy to list on top exchanges but a smart dev should know that its for the good of the project as well

You said the truth mate, no matter how good a project might seems to be the exchange they intend to use for IEO and later listing really matters for it to be successful. There are some red flag exchanges and any projects listed on them are bound to fail and any bounty hunter that works for such project is only wasting his time

There will still come a time when IEO will be story just like ICO was today, better fund raising idea will rise up and investing will be profitable more than how ICO was in 2017 but for now its better to stay away from projects that aim for cheap exchanges, it feels like they don't have a good plan for such project right from the start

thanks for reminding. I'm also fed up with bounty hunters projects ever. so tired and lost interest. I don't want to do any more research. It was all a dump  >:(

Gets listed in a popular exchange is always for the good of the project. Imagine all the privileges, publicity, the first impression that the project is legit and even enjoys the immense volume but it all comes with a big cost aswell and nowadays project could rarely gather that much amount of money to pay for listing except they  already in agreement with the exchanges beforehand.

If that project turns to shit after getting listed regardless the popularity of respective exchange that means the project is not good. Maybe you think it's good because it may align with your ideal or something else but truth is, the project is not good. Some truly good project could climb their way up to get listed into a popular exchange with their progression but majority of the project that just try that failed.

This lesson is very useful. I will see all bonuses listed. thank you.  ;)

The bounty hunter project is not as bad as you think. I have made quite a bit of money on this project and am still doing more research.  ;D

Most bounty campaigns do IEO in small exchangers and usually the funds are not as expected. The exchanger where the IEO is held does affect the sales of tokens and also the price after the initial listing. Small exchangers tend to have small transaction volumes so they cannot push up prices

The exchange is a matter for any IEOs, there is a study that most of the IEOs that are listed in not popular exchanges can now be considered as dead coin because it has no market participant, what I mean is there is no demand for it and that;s why its volume is low and also its price. If you will observe the IEOs projects nowadays, you will notice that only few projects are becoming successful and that's why exchange is really a matter.

indeed sometimes tokens that have been obtained from the bounty campaign are not in the exchange place and become junk tokens and that is usually sometimes indeed from the developer who does not want to register at the exchange and it is usually referred to as a project scam, it should be better to look for a bounty campaign can provide guarantees paid.

The crypto market is not really easy now for new coins. I have also seen that did their IEO on semi and small exchange that are doing well. It all depends on the team. Some teams are after their pocket not the investors.

Yes it is so clear that the quality of exchange in which a token is listed on have a notable effect on the price of the token upon listing.  I have participated in many bounties and i can for sure tell you that almost all bounties in which their token got listed on a top exchange have paid well whereas those listed on a low tier exchange struggle to give a profit which is not equal to 1/10 of what you earned by IEO price durring the bounty.  So to say i always check the possible exchange a token will get listed before i partake in the bounty so as to minimize disappointments

Nowadays some small crypto exchanges also going to lunch their own IEOs platform with free or charging some amounts but thay are never got good amount from the IEO with those crypto exchanges but they can hit exchange without any market volume. so the bounty hunters are always expecting that after ieo ends the coins going to hit big crypto exchanges but they do not know the reality about how big crypto exchanges are going to change for coins listing on their exchange I thought that it will be some big amount, I think that good crypto exchanges are very important matters in crypto market.

Bounty is now listed on the exchange is an extraordinary thing for now, because most of them are scams.
It must be remembered that the Bounty is not a big project, but an unknown project that is trying to develop in the market, so it is natural not to be directly in a large market because the process is not easy and also has a lot of costs.
It takes a strategy for each developer to advance.

Everyone is responsible for both investment and chosen bounty campaign, I can't blame the teams due to the costs of getting listed on the described exchanges. Considering the high fees and the commissions for IEO, I also prefer to list the token on the second level exchanges which have an average reputation among crypto investors. By the way, the public vote system is also used by some exchanges for listing the project.

You passed the tokoin bounty, because they held an IEO on Kucoin and now even their tokens are listed there, I followed the bounty and got some tokoin, but if IEO is on P2PB2B, LATOKEN, VINDAX and others I will avoid it, because I know their exchanges are only manipulate trading volumes with bots and don't even have trading volumes, usually projects that hold IEO on small exchanges will be destroyed and difficult to be listed on large exchanges

I think some projects that don't release on the market are strategies to hold their tokens from being 0. They are the project team waiting for a pump moment to be released on the market like 2017. Where 80% of the projects released in the market can survive with their ICO price . there are currently no projects released in the large market. because the costs are expensive and the market conditions are not good. so to give answers from members. especially bounty participants. they are released in small markets. it might also be a strategy to get rid of bounty hunters.

There is nothing more important than a good exchange listing for a new token. The biggest mistake is to list your token on latoken or exmarkets as the first listing and make huge losses. Such projects will never recover.

Well we cannot blame the projects, as there were lots of projects who were legit but their main priority and purpose is to develop to be proven in their investors that they are worth investing and that their hardearned money will not be wasted, I prefer this kind of strategy rather than going listed to a great exchange right after IEO/ICO then team will just dumped and will vanish right after it.

right, through media such as telegrams, the project team asks for advice from its members to choose a good exchange. but indeed the high listing fee is an obstacle to registering on the best exchange, especially in conditions like now, where the market is bearish and the sale of tokens is not good, of course this is a consideration of the team

Personally, we have the same experience I used to participate in a lot of project and some of them are good however, the real problem comes after the allocation because it will takes such along time just to be listed on exchanges and the worse possible scenario is it will not be listed. That is why from now on IEO would be a better option since its is already partnered with exchanges. Moreover, do make some research first about the project if it is worth of your time so that our effort will be not put in vain.

I've seen a bounty campaign whose tokens are listed on kucoin and maybe some bounty hunters have made a profit. I think if you believe in the project that you are promoting, you will definitely wait to list on exchangers that have a large volume and wait to get profit

No value after list, scam and not pay is bounty hunter risk, why you complaint?. Don't take too hard, you should have back up plan for that problems. Many people realize that profit in bounty world is just bonus. The main purposes is to get many information for their crypto blog/ web, built network between members and get referral/ follower for their affiliate/ social media. Try it and good luck to you.

Well I get your point, the exchanges where a project lists matters a lot. The likes of binance, KuCoin, houbi and some top exchanges give opening also to the growth of a token/coin. I think project developers should also consider  exchanges also while developing the project. It will help a lot rather than listing in some exchanges that turns a token/coin to shit

From your topic, you are very right,the exchange where a token is listed also have great effect on the token. When the volume in an exchange is low or there are no volume, what do you expect to be next? there will definitely be a great dump but that can be controlled when being listed in top exchanges.

There are exchanges which really has volume if you look at CMC but when the tokens are listed, it can't generate volume.
Most of its volume are on the major coins or tokens but I don't think they are really that liquid as they could just be faking their volume.

Therefore in this case, reputation of the exchange is very important and the team should choose those kind of exchanges with good reputation.

The project is now hard to have good market exchange prospects. Although it can be perched in a good market is not necessarily their volume too.
Because most of the sellers from the hunter and investors were a little to handle the demand and its supply so that the price is not swayed.

You are right, from one hand, but from the other one - the more people are sure in the project and take part in its bounty - the less you get as bounty hunter :) So, sometimes taking risk and taking part in unpopular bounties may lead you to huge winnings :)

Yes, the exchanges at the very top cadre in the crypto space perform  much better ad extent such performance to the coins listed on them alike. So, I won't be surprise if such exchanges are the choices of those who recognise and understand them. However, not every exchange that seems to be at the top give good outcome, but still fall along the way with effect on the coins on them.

of course,Large exchanges make a better effect but that is also not enough, it takes a good product so that the IEO coin can stay with its price. indeed, if a small exchange makes the price of the coin larger, fight in the bear market because there are not many investors in small exchangers.

Exchangers where IEOs are held must have an effect on token sales. Large investors always choose to place their funds in large exchangers because they are related to reputation and trust. IEO organized by large exchangers is almost all successful in sales and also successful after the initial listing

that's very logical
absolutely right, as good as any tokens if they are only listed on a small exchange it will be a waste of time and money because there are only robots and low buying and selling movements.
eventually they will give up and leave investors and tokens in the market until they are delist.

Exchangers who are reputable and have a large volume will be preferred by investors. IEO organized by small exchangers might not be good in achieving targets but if the community is active in the market and the project is able to produce good products, I think that eventually large exchangers will be interested in listing even sometimes without listing fees

You are right, i have learnt the lesson from few successful bounties this year, the reason why people are able to make huge profits from them is because low bounty hunters promoted the project, for example gowithmi bounty

Even in a small start but the team are really aiming for success, the process will continue and the progress will be the turning point for big exchange to
cater and add the project inside their exchange. There's project who are more concern about progress and for better delivering of their product than thinking with adding to exchange and use the fund that they've collected. It's best to focus with continues progress and survive with the market trends
before thinking about additional listing exchange.

This is one of the major determinant of project success. Apart from having enticing business plan, good team and solid community, the token or coin must be listed on a reputable exchange with good volume for it to be able to maintain its stance in the market

With large or renowned exchanges, the thing is they never allow poor projects with to use their platform or name in any way. IEO is more or less like a contract between the exchange and project. Exchange audits the project extensively to make sure no signs of scams are present. Small exchanges care less about these things be cause they need money at the moment and want to increase their customer first.

This is not necessarily true. There are some projects that raise a lot of capital and list on a large exchange like Digifinex, Coinbene, .. but still don't want to develop community and the value of the token. This is one of the common cases of projects that pretend to be reputable and are actually a fraud project.
I will present evidence for you to consider. WPP token, Bitnautic token. This is one of the projects that tricked investors in a very sophisticated way. so we should not analyze a sketchy project when they plan to list it on large exchanges. Check out their roadmap and how to develop their projects.

however, it's a matter of product. although people are waiting for the IEO project in the popular market, but without a good product, the project will die. I once read the status of the Binance CEO, he said: "it's not a matter of money, it's a product quality problem". however, a good product will definitely have good development. for example like ETH, BNB, and other popular coins.
targeting the market is important, but the most important is the product.

IEO's success depends on the chosen Exchange. Usually if the project chooses an ordinary and not too popular Exchange, the project will be less interested and will end up in junk coins. this happens a lot now. New projects do have to work hard to achieve their goals so that many join and invest in the project.
Exchange like p2pb2b. Exmarket etc is one of the exchanges chosen by fake projects and small projects for slisting coins.

Everybody is having their own lots of stories to say. Exchange listing is important. At the same all listing does not fetch good money for bounty hunters expecially. Lots of projects end up team selling the most tokens to dump as much as possible and run away.

investors still believe only for large markets, several times I tried ieo on bittrex and hotbit, the results were quite disappointing, although both exchanges were very popular before binance appeared like a meteor. there must be proper procedures for the project and the exchange so that they protect each other's reputation, because trust only arises from a history of repeated sales success.

Yes, exchanges matters a lot because they're the lifeline of a project and no matter how good and credible a project is, no matter the team behind it, if it is not listed on a credible exchange, it will die slowly

Good exchanges are very important for the success of the project. And I believe that the project should strive to ensure that their coin is traded on well-known exchanges, because it contributes to its spread.

Yes, it's very crucial to check the exchanges where ieo is being launched. A lot of not so popular exchanges end up being at a loss after listing unlike the more popular ones.

yeee, today top exchanges have cleary guidance how to be listed, and if projects are not listed there it means that there is a lack in credability 90% of the times

Exchange Bittrex in my opinion still has good credibility, but for HotBit exchange I do not recommend it. lots of junk coins in hotbit. I have shitcoin on hotbit and cannot be sold. It seems that binary is only capable of making the IEO project a success for now. Just look at the success of the Harmony Project in Binance, even though the project emerged when the crypto market was in a bad condition, but many investors participated in harmony.

For sure it will matter a lot, we are talking about fundraising here and small exchanges like p2pb2b,exmarkets and  latoken dont raise much compared to top exchanges who always reach their hardcap no matter what like Binance, Huobi, Gate and Kucoin. And this kind of bounty who have IEO on top class exchange is very rare to find.

Actually its depends upon bounty hunter that he is joined after proper research on the bounty or just check the thread and join the bounty, few exchanges have not worth of tokens or coins like exmarkets,p2pb2b, Latoken, and others low rank or unknow exchanges, don't join bounty that is listed in these exchanges. I have joined two bounties SERO that was listed in gate.io and the other one is recently received and will be received for four months that is TOKOIN listed in KUCOIN.

in fact, exchangers are only one important thing that needs to be considered from a project. but, that doesn't mean that only lists on popular exchangers will keep the token going up. I strongly agree that a popular exchanger is very important and makes people interested, but the other important thing that needs to be considered to make the price of the token up many times is its development and function.

Listing on Exchange with good liquidity is good but not really the most important, the important factor there is having a good project and a trusted one which has been the issue . I have seen lots of projects that listed on popular Exchanges and still didn't make any progress so Exchange listing isn't just the only thing.

Of course it is great to participate in a Bounty campaign of the project listed on top Exchange. Unfortunately, such projects are holding Bounties really seldom and they usually allocating a small pool for Bounty hunters.

to add to this, good projects hardly want to do IEO nowadays, they are in most cases contented with Private sales. Always watch out for such projects. lastly dont jump into a bounty blindly, there are thrads created for scam projects here on bitcointalk, always take your time to research here on bitcointalk as well as about the project team before enrolling for any bounty.

yep exchange matters, but some good projects can't list in the big exchanges because listing fee is too high for them and that's why they end up a new exchanges or not a well known exchange because the listing fee there is low.

Sometimes the "small pool" allocated by bounties for coins already listed on exchanges is far better than those yet to begin trading. For instance, we come across bounties yet to list with huge allocation of up to 5M$ worth their token, but at the end personal rewards tend to be messy in most cases. However for bounties with coin listed on exchange, at least you can be sure that's the actual value at that moment even if it dumps after distribution. Also, the particular exchange in which a coin is listed matters a lot, you can't expect massive price dump after distribution  from a coin listed on Binance, on the other hand, if a coin is listed say on VINDAX with very poor trading volume, reward will always be messy after distribution due to price dip.

They can still be a good project, exchange is not a major requirement, they can actually start from a small exchange and do what they promise to the investors so they will gain the trust and confidence.

Those projects that are successful now does not all start in big exchanges, and take note,  there are also projects that are in big exchanges now that are struggling, others was already delisted, so we can't really make that as a basis.

Confirm listed coin are doing it or confirm sure they will be success, because now they don't need bounty hunters to listed. Kucoin and gate exchange listed coin also dump. All are depends on supply and legit project where exchange and volume is helpers to surge.

Good big projects will never list on small exchanges, they will want to safe their reputation because i am sure developers know about exchanges will fake volumes, i belief that only projects with inexperience teams go for small exchanges thinking they are saving themselves from overspending

Bounty projects that plan to list on big exchanges are rare to find but they are always worth it when you see one, i missed tokoin project which was listed on kucoin and bounty hunters dump their tokens but price still remains the same, i was so surprised

I agree with you as regards the importance of an exchange on the performance of a project. It takes a valid project to host her IEO on global exchange like binance and kucoin. The importance of top exchange on cryptocurrency space cannot be overemphasised.

You are right, I was so shocked that they promised a lot of money, that I decided that it was a fraud and did not participate, because I recently saw big promises from the project. with tambourines and since then I stopped believing in projects that are already listed on the exchange, but it turns out that in vain.

Right, I totally agree with what you say, because we have seen a lot and happened that good big projects will never be listed on the small exchange, even if the big project is accepted by all exchanges, both small and large exchanges, and the team clearly wants to safeguard their reputation for fear of trading the volume of their tokens to be falsified.

Tokoin is not putting a lot of money in the bounty campaign and tokoin is also putting a few tens thousand dollars to the its campaign, that's why that doesn't affect the price of tokoin. But what do you mean about the fraud and do you mean about tokoin? it looks like you are not even reading the context.

Exchanges are as important as the project and in most cases where a project is listed will to a large extent determine if the project is going to survive or not

This is true. You can see how big the ROI are for the IEO listed in the binance exchange. They are the defacto model of exchange IEO. All of the IEO from them have given a profit and last IEO Kava provided upto 180% ROI in investment. Gate.io is another profitable launchpad. IEO's in other popular launchpad like bibox, bitforex, probit and even binancedex has an average of negative ROI.

A whole world exchanges are emerging but how many of them can actually boast of having projects with high volume being traded daily on the exchange. Successful projects are usually listed on the more established exchanges

I may say yes but seeing that only a few of them succeed, this means that only a few of them will also be listed to reputable exchanges and the rest wouldn't have a chance. That is so sad to think and the team behind never give an extra effort just to get listed and makes their investors will gain profit also. Cause they only take good care of their own and not the benefits of everyone especially for their promoters.