Bitcoin Forum

I need lists of projects that were thought to be scam and faced many wrong accusations but in the end still thrive and become successful today, any? I believe not all project that appears to be scam ends up been scam because people suspect them to be

I can't think of any new coin than ferrum network, i missed the bounty early 2019 and hunters quickly dumped but price increase a lot after a while, some said the ceo lied about University things but who cares? The project is doing very well and others are already calling it scam

Indeed, many projects now cannot be ascertained by scams or not, what is clear that I consider scam is plagiarism, the fake photos are considered scamer because they do not show their own work on white paper and do not display original photographs.
And there are also many who say the project is a scam but is still growing rapidly until now and I think it's only natural and it could be a rumor as long as you don't plagiarism.

You need to know about the allegations of a scam project, if they really committed fraud and the people who reported it provided specific research evidence then the project was really a scam. and if only limited to accusations without strong evidence then the project can continue to grow. You need to know the allegations made, then you can assess the project scam or not

if you want to find out real scam information you can see it in the scamer thread, actually among the projects that are accused of being the act of the fudder giving false news but there are some scam projects that are so anonymous that there have even been many successful even entering CMC even bounced high and in the end the project was a scam like MINEX

how did you think Ferrum was scam really?
Which scam tried to collect just 1 million $?
Ferrum is one of the greatest potential in the market. Moreover, most of people don't know anything about Ferrum yet.

Maybe the project you call is a very professional scammer, so we don't realize it ourselves. lately there have been many CEO projects running away. And yaps, lack of insight is also a matter make a scam project develop or as a FUD. Maybe the project accusation can also be a FUD, but at least the scam allegations on the board are real and factual.

Maybe the OP should visit this board https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0 because there are a lot of scamer lists caught with evidence so there's no need to compare it with others because it is true that you say a project that does not have proof then can well developed, but the assessment is always different and can be in your own way.

When your project have some shady characteristics you don't blame the community for calling it scam instead you try to prove to the community that their assumption are wrong. Judging the book by its cover is very common in the community since numerous project have used similar technique to scam thousands of users so you don't blame them for employing that strategy to keep them safe or reduce the rate at which this projects scam them.  Your believe is just an excuse as a scam projects will never scam even though the community thinks it's a scam.

Most projects with strong scam allegations especially with good proof are actually scam in the real sense, even if they try so hard to clear the scam accusations. I remember a project that deleted me from their group for asking about their team identity and if they will host a video AMA or attend any crypto conference. Also some guys complained of admins suspected to clear up all buy orders after listing, yet the coin is still listed and trading on those exchanges. Well, a few projects have false scam allegations even though I'm yet to come across any.

Reputation thread and scam accusations section here in forum is a useful one, they tend to reveal news, sources and information with proofs that these project are scam like duplicate teams, copied road maps and registrations. It's good to check here than in other websites.

Yeah, it was mostly like you said. But we found scam accusations made very unfairly. Therefore it is not correct to think that every accusations is valid. I remember so many people who once said TRX scam, for example...

Guess you're looking for this to use it as a reference when a project is called a scam.

Well, pretty much all top altcoins were called scams in the past.  Bitcoin too was called a scam in its early days... today it's one of the most important cryptocurrency in the world.
 If you truely believe in your project, no amount of scam tag will make you abandon it except maybe death or being prevented from using Bitcoin

I saw several accusations against Zeux but they did well in 2019 and still have good trading volume in Coinall exchange. But that doesn't mean accusation was wrong! They had a problem with the fake team and whitepaper plagiarization, so, it's normal to tag them as scam or shit project. But later they improved and was a successful project indeed and bounty hunters earned huge money!

You're Thread title captures my attention, and i agree with you, many forum users are often judgemental about some projects, other people are just easily called and tag any project a scam without any supporting evidence and i think that's a wrong attitude you cant accuse anyone base on your doubt. it should be rightfully treated with any supporting evidences to support any scam accusation on the rightful section of this forum. in my own experience i've been scammed 3 times already and resulting of losing my hard earned money but despite of those bad experiences i still believe in some good projects out there.  

I can not give an idea of this type of project. Given that scammers are more common in the crypto world, there is such a situation where 1 mistake takes all the truths. The only false news of any project will cause all supporters to lose trust in it. Since the prices are also volatile, the project will soon die. It is very difficult for the sunken ship to surface.

Maybe you can start here: Scam Accusations (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0).

But it might take a while because you need to go one by one about the projects being accused of. Of course, it's just an accusations and projects can defend themselves. But remember that there are projects as well that we can't detect to be a scam in the beginning, but in the end, turns out to be a fraud.

The loudest scam is the plus token pyramid, which scams users and stole a billion-dollars in cryptocurrency. This is already a lot of information on the Internet. if you ask about cryptocurrency projects that have turned out to be scammers after the ICO/IEO, then there are a lot of these and we can list them for a very long time. 2019 was a very bad year for ICO/IEO projects and for the people who invested in them

Maybe the project was caught by scamer because of plagiarism and other photo fraud so that it is easily detected and can be archived on the Fraud Allegation board.
But what is difficult to detect in a fraudulent project is that when the project runs and gets funding from sales, the CEO takes investor money and run away this is unpredictable.

The bounty hunters were not dumping it as ferrum network is only putting small amounts to be distributed among the bounty participants. The price of ferrum network is disappointing so many investors.

I remember there was a lot of scam accusations to the credit, crypterium, Monaco and almost all of the successful altcoins in the market were getting the wrong accusations and they are all fine right now.

I don't think there are even any projects that didn't received a wrong accusations of being an scam. Though most of those accusations are true for projects in 2018 and 19.
The most funny accusation to remember for me is Ethereum. Because I was one of the people who claimed Ethereum to be a scam when it started. My understanding of Ethereum was also the reason why I was late on joining the Ethereum train.

There were projects in the past that were accused, they proved to be not but they were not scam. This isn't yet final.
We can not say they are successful now just because they have launched their product already, these projects can still end scam one day when the team can't release a new roadmap for them to achieve next. These projects needs a continuing dedication to serve for the new investors coming into the project and serve the users of the future.

That's right but the fact is you can't promote a project that got accusations with proof by a Bitcointalk forum member! Many got red trust by participating in Zeux and Nexxus rewards bounty campaign! Where I myself made good profits from those coins. Though I already opted out from Nexxus Rewards project but I am still a holder of ZEUX coin!

Scam project will always be scam project, moreover if they were use fake team/copy another whitepaper project in order to attract a lot of investors, it will be useless for them.

Why do you have thoughts like this? Have you ever promote a project that end up in scam because there is someone who cought it?

I once found someone accusing one of the exchange projects of scam just because the withdrawal at the exchange was problematic, even though the withdrawn balance did not reach $ 50 and the Exchange had already made an official announcement that there was indeed a problem for withdrawals and in the end the accusation was incorrect. That is indeed very ridiculous without strong evidence accusing the project concerned is a fraud.

How about miracle tele project? Many called it scam because they stop paying staking rewards but they never exit scam till now, i feel it's mismanage of fund that course the halt, now things are shaping up bit by bit

I don't know of any such project. In my experience/participation whatever coin/project has been accused of scam turned out to be a scam and price of those tokens/coins has dumped to the ground.

There is a reason it was tagged scam, probably there's something that went wrong or misleading. There will be no smoke if there is no issue so there might be some info that makes it taggers as scam.  We can be wrong if they will answer and provide details on how they will handle the news of them.

Of course you can't see devs running away beforehand, but at least those people can get caught if the are using their real identities. Investors money is of course gone when this happens but its way less riskier.

I am more afraid of the projects that blow their ico money on jetset lifestyle in a year.

Not like this, but there are projects like DOGE created for jokes but later taken seriously, not proven to be backed up to fully like the USDT, and like Tron whose past is thought to be dark. Look at the IEO/ICO market, can you see how much investment is decreased? Now compare this situation with scam projects. While there are all sorts of opportunities in the market, who and why would they believe in the scam project again?

He was feeling doubt about the fact not all of the projects that already accused are actually the scam project. Maybe lack of the update and transparency makes the investors are accusing it as a scam project. But investors are right in this case as the team must be transparent with them.

Miricale tele is not a scam project, but simply idiotic project management at the initial stage and too much interest for token holders. they should have to pay money to the holders of coins only after they began to make a profit, but under their management, it turned into some kind of pyramidal scheme and the founders of the project sold it to other people who are now trying to fix something, but I think they will not do it

of course it is very detrimental to big and small investors because fraudsters like that are big-time bastards but if the project is transparent and real then their enemy is the FBI who will move and will definitely be jailed, it is difficult if the project with anonymous identity

I think it depends on the angle you choose to define the scenario from
In most cases, people call a certain project scam because their investments got rekt

And for startups, there can't be supposed scam. The scam accusation are always with proof

Almost every project in the Altcoin section (including ethereum, litcoin and ripple) was at one point rated as scam by certain individuals and skeptics. This is almost an integral part in the history of every project...
So it is important to make your own judgment and not blindly trust unknown people and unverified sources. Everyone acts on their own self-interests. Each action we take is done to benefit ourselves whether we realize it or not.

I doubt that you'll be able to find any.

The actual scam accusations which have solid proof behind them generally don't get it wrong. Especially in the altcoin space where the people behind the majority of projects have questionable motives, their accuracies should not be doubted.

The bottom line is that you should NOT invest in any accused projects whatsoever. Even if the accusation turns out to be false, you stand to lose way more than you stand to gain 99% of the time, because of the negative publicity that will be received by the project that could hurt its development.

One way or the other, the project is a failure. If the founders lost trust in their project and scheme, I really wonder if recovering or improving it is possible for someone who does not even have any vision for it. In my honest opinion, it would be best to not invest everything into this project because there exist far better options than this one for sure. At most, a little portion can be invested to try it out.

If there is a proof about the accusation it will be listed in the accusation thread, not sure about wrong accusation and there are hundreds of projects coming out on a daily basis and here if people have the time they will expose the lies. Not sure why you are looking for wrongly accused projects and if the team can explain all the doubts then they can clear themselves.

And that's already confirmed as a scam project and you just need to visit its official site and it goes offline right now, i heard that if miracle tele has become an exit scam project since it was never giving any update to the investors.

Hey OP if you really need the list of those accused as scam project then you need a person who will compile that for you and it takes a lot of the to research those so best to pay them up for the service given and for sure you will get what you wanted, and if you just rely here maybe you will get a wrong information since sometimes some other user don't know the history and just talk nonsense things.

I am still wondering how they became scammer with only a few million dollars from ICO, only bounty hunters think Ferrum is a scam, because the price of ferrum has fallen too low and makes many people unable to get the desired profits. Ferrum is still doing their job well and its price will definitely increase in the future

People accuse many projects of being scam because many ICO projects were previously scam in 2018, so they naturally become suspicious, but indeed I think also not all ICO projects are scam, there are also projects that are good and running well until now, even experiencing development the good one. So actually the problem here is that it is difficult to distinguish between  scam project and a good project.

This is because even good project now eventually becoming scam that's why many investors now are afraid to invest in any good ico because of the fear that this will turn to scam again. Thats why investing in ICO projects are now very risky. Because even good project that have idea and working product are becoming scam.

I also had the same opinion, there are several projects that are important in payment. But still paid in the future, there is also a delayed in exchange. Back to the relationship factor between several people who are often involved in scamm and participate in the project. So we all have to examine in detail about the projects that we will follow.

Many people judge the project as a scam or not through how the updates are carried out by the project and the project must be transparent and not cover any updates and their steps going forward to be able to develop the project. Because there is no update will make it easy for people to judge that the project is a scam.

We can't blame them for being in doubt because we can't change the fact that it is difficult to find good and profitable project these days, you can't easily trust a project that is why it is always suggested to have some research and ask other people's experiences to assure ourselves that our funds is safe and secured from scammers. It's just sad to see that even those project you consider as good can be a scam at the end of the day because people are being greedy, they are just thinking for their own good and they will not look for other people's suffering because they just wanted to take advantage of us so they can get the benefits they wanted. It is the reason why you should not expect people to believe and invest in projects these days because they are hesitating to take the opportunity because it is either waste of time and money or a beautiful experience.

Investor's views are formed like that because of the many frauds that exist in new projects. and at this time they still do not believe much in new projects, therefore it takes time to restore investor confidence because trust when disappointed is difficult to return, and takes time.

We cannot blame people who accused some projects to be a scam because there are really lots of scammers here already, and a lot of people here already experience it that they are scammed so I think they are just sharing their thoughts, opinion and experience here.

Some of them are wrongly accused especially when some information about the team is not clearly pronounce of the admin managing the bounty has a bad history of promoting scam coins. To aid your research fo alleged scam projects which turned out fine, you should look in the direction of Ferrum Network and Zeux coin

He is not requesting for list of scam project rather give an example of a project you know that was once accused to be a scam and still waxing strong, many of you commenting don't even understand the op before making your post, and this is a simple and straight forward topic, why should it be move to services? is there any service been rendered here ::)

btc was accused to be scam by many who now praise it, and for decades now still doing very strong, that is one example.

After the  HYPE, token sales failed hardly and there was no exit for affected projects. I double checked my investment list and decided to choose the best ones. The scammers use their ability to steal from pockets of people,investors are supposed to behave smarter than scammers in order to not fall the trap.

At least to blame any projects for fraud, you need good reason or evidence of this.  At least with regard to the Ferrum project, it is still only developing today, and their coins are not badly traded on the Bitmax exchange.  In addition, according to the latest indicators, these coins have almost 20% growth in price.  I think that the prospects and future opportunities can be judged only after a while.  but in my opinion, the topic was nevertheless created for me with the bias that a lot of skeptics spoke out negatively about bitcoin, but nevertheless, the capitalization of this coin is in the lead in the cryptocurrency market.

Updates information are important, but we can look at the road map before asking for updates to the project because there will be many questions about altcoin prices, when prices will rise or if there are plans to buy back by the developer.
It is difficult to distinguish between fraudulent projects and real projects because fraudsters have ways to convince investors.

The one that came to mind is Qtum, I have intention of investing in the project, but FUD on this forum makes my interest to wane, but the ICO sold out very fast, and pump after exchange listings and did more than 28X for ICO investors. Even with the bear market it is still one of the project doing well for ICO investors

events like this are difficult to express, the project was really real at the beginning but in the end was a scam. example such as the miracletele project are all real, starting from the team, whitepapers and patners but in the end it turns into a scam. it is very difficult to identify projects from the start because they can change at any time. I avoid new projects.

I have not heard of such projects. As a rule, everything happens the other way around, the project is accused of scam, for some time it keeps itself with all its appearance showing that the project is working,
people even begin to believe in it, and then scam happens. In a year, two, five years, but this always happens.

Yes there are many projects that have been accused of a scam. But they are doing well. One of them is ethereum. In the first place, people accused ethereum of a scam project. Likewise, another good-doing crypto project that has been accused of a scam, but is doing good is Sessia (kicks). Often time, people label any crypto project a scam when they have personal argument. 

You don't need to look for those altcoins because most altcoins are alleged to be scams. I don't know why but during altcoin operations, most altcoins get FUD from investors in this market. It could be because the altcoin prices have collapsed in the last 2 years or the pumping and dumping has been rapid at exchanges. Even the best altcoins in this market such as ETH, XRP, BNB .. are also considered as altcoin scams.

Every argument given personally does not have to be believed directly, because the occurrence of scams or not in a project is after we examine further, so do not immediately believe in every argument that has no reference or analysis.

Sometimes people judge the project as a scam or not based on what they observe without knowing more about the project, projects that fail because of not achieving softcap or funding and cannot run the project will be judged by people as a scam project because people judge the project based on the results achieved .

It is the fault of the scammers and there the one that should blamed. The scam projects before created panic and fear among the cryptocurrency community. That's why the investors are keep decreasing as time passing by because of the scammers. The ICOs and IEOs are now have bad image to the public, it is better if we are just be careful in order to protect our capital.

Obviously is hard to accused without solid evidences because we need more investigation. We can't consider the telegram group died if we can still see it actively the admin there and the team still updating us and continue to show new update but the funds we don't have idea if its gone or its still kept on their wallets. I mean, A lot of propaganda need to spread and followers need to believe to them that a project are scam. But in the end of the day its not.

Perhaps, they have been accused for a particular reason and not because it was just a mere mistake. Anything proven those project would be force to shutdown as they won't be gaining any more trust from potential investors and/or advertisers. That is why it is vital to just mistakenly accused highly important project as it has to be investigated well enough.

Normally in legal works there is a saying "innocent until proven guilty" and that is how you approach to criminals, maybe they are not criminals, you have to assume they didn't do anything wrong until there is a proof of them actually committing a crime, now if you don't do that and act like they are criminals even before any proof, the judge could make a wrong decision.

However in crypto world, it works just the opposite, you are considered a scam until you can prove that you are not a scam, the day one of any project is labeled as scam or shady or shitcoin because we had so many of them that statistically it is more possible for a coin to be scam than a successful one, maybe just 1% of them makes money. That is why we will keep on calling all coins scam until it comes out that they are not.

If that is the case then it could not be considered to be wrongly accused cryptocurrency projects that turn out to be profitable and legit right? Because I always hear about the ferrum network before, even then, it already has a negative reputation from the reviews and comments provided by the users here in this forum, plus in the telegram groups concerning the bad image of it in the public, like literally accusing it isn't performing well and is called to be scam. I don't think it is improving now.

Personally, I think there are so many projects that people no longer understand where good projects are and where are fraudulent ones. And to find out whether the project is promising or not, you need to participate. And then the picture of the whole project will be visible. And many participants simply lost confidence in the projects.

So you mean we have to take risks to invest in the project. In order to immediately find out whether it is a good project or a bad (scam) I think this method has a very big risk to spend money to know whether a project is good or not.

Of the many projects then some we can say success and many among us often stuck with a scam project so that the trust of the bounty hunters has been very few, and we are hard to judge a good project or a scam, because at the end of the ICO The unexpected is often the case, and our hope for this year all projects can be far from Scamer.

I haven't found a project like that, but it seems like it's quite a lot. the accusations of scam sometimes come from bounty hunters or airdrop participants. some projects sometimes use bounties or airdrop participants for their advertising, only sometimes they don't pay for them. so, their project was a success, and they were accused of being a scam. thing, I can't mention the project, but you can find it yourself.

There are still plenty of legitimate projects or ICO's even in this forum but the thing is even if they are legit but doesn't have a investors it's going to be useless since they need money to run the token or the project that is made in the end the small percentage of investors that invested in the project is useless and ending to a dead token or bankrupt thing in the project it was not intentional but a scam.

Of course. There are projects that are not clear about development so some things are analyzed and concluded to be fraudulent for bounty projects. Dronair bounty, for example, I feel that they have done nothing but provide lack of information about their project. It has been flagged by a series of members and also banned by the moderator from performing signature campaigns. Anyway, everything moderators do for us for good, we should not blame them.

We're hoping that this year has less scam projects but it seems that we have already plenty of it today. Sometimes I don't trust the BM that they said they came from project team and I prefer to join bounty campaigns that hire BM came from this forum. I rather trust them compared to newbies account. Some accusations like in TRX turned to project advantage because they become popular to the market. ATL also said that scam project at first, but they still give payouts.

Most of the bounty hunters like that are incompetent, they dont even read shit and immediately accuse and call the project scam, most of the time i read their post on the group chat like a month or two after the bounty distribution. Projects not paying their bounty hunters are pieces of shit.

That's a harsh truth! Most of the bounty hunters don't read even the rules properly and don't check the pinned post, so they keep asking when distribution, when exchange, when moon shit things! So, When they get removed or denied, they start accusing scam project! Though there was some project that raised good money, still in the market but ignored to pay to the bounty hunters! So, accusing them as a scammer not bad at all!

There are many of them and this is caused by people's negligence to read and make research, they term a very good project scam and there leading to many missing on a good project

Savedroid is one of the cryptos that was at a time accused of being a scam but they have lasted for years after proving that it was only a prank gone wrong.

Hmmm, this actually reminded me of a very important project I missed simply because people termed it scam, and the most annoying part is that I did the Bounty and wrote articles but didn't submit again cos of it. After that encounter with Coinhe, I learnt the hard way and since then I started making my own research before on any projects and stop listening to people

This wrong accusations have affected a lot of hunters that do not research on such claims, recently I came across an accusations of a particular project coz the project took about 8 months about the bounty end to distribute tokens but at last it wasn't a scam, what was needed was just patience.
I think the delay in sharing tokens after campaign has ended is the reason why people tag projects a scam.

BITCOIN!

quite difficult to find something like that. if there is, then the project will only be successful at the beginning, and then slowly become a real scam. as far as the project that I support, there are only two possibilities, legit and scam. if there is an indicated scam, then 90% of it becomes a scam.

Most times projects that have scam allegations don't usually do well later on. Sometimes the scam accusation is not really genuine and it might not be based on facts or just bounty payments. These kinds sometimes do well but the real ones are the those that have white paper allegation, token manipulation, ICO/IEO details manipulation are usually strong.

Almost all projects that raise funds do face such accusations at different stages of development, in the last 2 years many projects have scammed but it was mainly due to the fact that they had no liquid funds to continue the project while some just exit scammed. I know a few that were continuously accused of being fake or scam but are still here and their products are of good quality and im expecting them to be success in the future, i will not name them here because no one wants to be linked with scam especially at a public place.

savedroid is a scam, scam, scam and scam project. There's no need to say about that because so many people have accused this project. It's not only a prank but it's a real scam project as the token has no usage and the team was not even releasing something that useful for the community. That's a crap project since the team played a prank to the investors.

A little earlier I worked with projects such as HiveNet and Diagon, and I spent quite a long time to disseminate information about this project.  But recently, I generally cannot get the proper information about exactly what prospects each project has in the future.  Of course, the Diagon team still somehow informs the participants about their activities, but HiveNet generally shows ignore and at the same time removes participants from the telegram group for certain questions.

   You can start from Bitcoin, I think you can still see people talking how Bitcoin is a scam. After Bitcoin I think
you will see it's a case with almost all crypto-currencies. I tried to find some info about which coin is accused
or marked as a scam most times, but I couldn't find anything.
   When I joined this forum I use to read old topic. I remember reading how Ethereum is a big scam in the
beginning, find some topics from 2014-2015 about Ethereum and you will see that for yourself.

I do not think such lists exist. But most projects, regardless of size, face different accusations. Just as we investigate whether a project is not a scam, we must investigate the allegations. As an example, I remember when Cardano just came out on the market a lot of people were telling  that they were scam project. However, they still exist and occupy high positions.

You know a group project is only exciting in the beginning coz every one has this burning desire to complete it but when they have done until the middle, things are getting hard and people are starting to quit. I think this also goes the same with projects lately, they are just attracted to start a project because of the supposed to be earnings in the end, little they did know that it is very hard to do and costs too much.
This is the very reason why I quit on joining bounty campaigns, it was not like the old times were you can get a hell of a prize after a success project.

That they are now well established does not mean they will not still have one accusation or the other. Ethereum till date is still facing its own challenges, particularly when it is plunging. People say all sort of things. The wrong accusation most times are used as propellers for FUD.
Since those in the past experienced it, new ones should expect much more than that. If they are able to pass the test of accusations, they will get better and stronger.

This space is wild really wild. There's no knowing scam or no scam until the project proves otherwise. Many projects have been accused of scam and were not scam. Projects like Sharpe exit scam even when they looked legit and all. Its best we stay suspicious and not fall for scam.

Practically every cryptocurrency and gambling platform has had at least one scam accusation opened against them.

This is usually because people are stupid and end up losing their money and then blaming the platform for being rigged or bugged. However, there are some genuine concerns where people experience a real problem with the platform. You can then tell how trustworthy a company is based on how it responds to these rare cases.

This is the best! BTC is basically, a scam scheme for most people who don't know cryptocurrency. Until now, even though many people have introduced to the industry, they are still saying that it is a scam and where are they now? Missed the train? NOt really but I guess they are regretting the decision of not believing this wonderful financial innovation.

I have seen many projects that had such wrong accusations but ended up doing well but faced lots of challenges trying to express their genuinety and win people's confidence back.
It is always advisable to verify about a project thoroughly well before going to make wrong assumptions.

Scam accusation is rampant here. Most projects were accused becaused they failed to keep the campaign promises. some where accused because they failed to reach agreement with marketing groups, developers, and many other things. even COTI was accused of been a scam. it is till standing. substratum was called a scam and after listing on binance, it was revealed to be a scam.

Remember when a new  project launched in the market. We don't know about the project stands with success or  not. But many projects hunt by the  scammers, that results project effective & go slowdown in the market price & not stands long time in the market.

Because it's still an accusation, right? if the facts gathered as evidence are inaccurate, then that doesn't mean anything. Isn't cryptocurrency always full of surprises? even so don't ignore the analysis and don't just rely on luck. Nowadays, scammers are really skilled at hiding their fakes. We must also develop our abilities, prepare good strategies.
In any case, do not be greedy. Do everything you can, and don't forget to always be grateful for our fortune.

The problem is the project must prove itself to make sure those who accused the projects will try to believe with it. This is a very difficult task that no project can do that.
I remember so many people have already made accusations to the project without tried to provide enough prove even the major projects got a lot of accusation.

To avoid these wrong assumptions, try to visit this scam accusations section in the forum because this reveals those projects that are really scams and those that are suspected only but in the end it turned out to be a successful project. It's better to check also their ann thread if its active and the history of bounty manager if he is reputable or not.

true every accusation without evidence do not believe first, sometimes there are also people who want to destroy a project by sending fraud allegations and others without evidence and make investors so scared, so we have to examine it yourself and draw your own conclusions do not be influenced by others

Hex project sometimes ago was accused of being scam. Just yesterday I saw news of it doing well. I can only be happy with investors who invested in it. I managed to go through their telegram page and website and I discovered that the project isn't bad after all. Sometimes project accused of scam do well. Zeus was also accused of scam sometime ago. But it did well still. Mind you, altcoins remain altcoins. The only cryptocurrency you should trust is Btc

I don't have an exact list but they are very few of them. Most of the times, people who by their own mistake fails to do what intended to and lose money complains the most.
There are further more instances of project doing mistakes and after accusation, they correct themselves and establish as a legit company. But it doesn't mean we can trust a project with accusations. 99% of flagged projects are scams.

There really comes a time that most people are mistakenly putting wrong blame on most projects that can be seen in the forum just because the projects are looking too good to be true or does not meet their expectations to consider it as a good project. Wrong allegations towards a project makes negative impact and impression about it which can also affect other projects because of other people who are wrongly generalizing that all projects are scam which is really not true. Well, most are scam but NOT all. So before believing into other people's opinions better check it for yourself because we all do have different perspective that can affect on how we see a certain project. Putting wrong allegations towards projects are putting them into bad reputation making those projects to fail because people specially potential investors are getting afraid to get engage into it. Better to do thorough research about a project because projects cannot be easily determined as good or scam by just one glance.

Ixinium is one of the projects that has been accused of being a scam but in the end they prove to everyone that they are not like that and Ixinium also provides many benefits to bounty hunters and investors

Back in the day when ICO is still hyped up there are simply so many project that most of them have their own haters which might spread false information or even discourage people from investing their money into the project. However their presence somewhat make people more alerted about the project and therefore increase the urge of investigating the project before investing. I will say that these people could somehow balance the market.

In my opinion, sometimes the accused project is really a scam in the end. we need to understand it and correct ourselves for what has been accused by others and it is also bad to blame others if someone warns us beforehand.

Seriously most times you might not blame those who tag projects to be scam because they might have seen many turn-offs to conclude at such. The only one I can remember is Zeux, and if my memory serves me right I think the accusations was based on whitepaper plagiarism or thereabouts and everyone knows the negative effect of that. But yet, to show the team  are actually after value still continued with their project and it turns out to be good both for investors and bounty hunters.

I think not just one project that scams but there are many scam projects that even exchange places that have already gotten a hardcap when IEO can also scam so basically you have to be careful when you want to invest wherever you are.

I got to hear about this project last week. Currently trading well with a decent price. Hex was also accused of scam and its currently trading on several exchanges with decent volumes. I think we shouldn't be too quick to tagging projects scam. They still need benefits of doubts.

Seriously, with the way some projects are being run, you can get discouraged right from the start. Imagine a project whose team will not be able to answer a simple question about their project, with that, you would have been discouraged and might make you feel the project is not heading mo where meaningful. I think that was what happened in the case of Ixinium. HEX and other projects.