Bitcoin Forum

I'm glad we have IEO for new projects to raise funds successful after ICO did lots of damages to investors trust but that's not all, I want something that can help new upcoming projects to raise funds easily, for IEO if you don't have enough money for top exchanges there is 70% chances that you will come out with a bad result...

What do you think could solve this? New Fund raising?

It's true that not all new projects can afford top exchanges but we have few exchanges that aren't that costly for IEO like binance or okex, here are some exchanges that are still good and less costly

1. Hoo.exchange
2. Probit exchange
3. Upbit
4. Bithumb

These exchanges still have good results of past IEO projects

One of the reason why people are fed up of crypto fundraising projects is due to the webmasters with their dreams.
For an idea to come true, the idea only is not enough. The project should bring in experience, capital as well as dedications.
A project stated with $100 of web hosting with free domain would rarely achieve any success.

Upbit and Bithumb rarely do IEO with low projects but they look for quality even Upbit and Bithumb rarely do IEO except probit and other low exchanges. Every new project they always accommodate, even though many failures occur.

The reason why many of these projects failed is through their inability to have a solid team behind the project for fundraising. Imagine a project that has all the available team for it grow and those team members are expert in their various fields of life the project won't suffer any lack. A project well nature and develop will attract those top class exchange to the project and not the project attract the said top exchange.  What we have seen of recent is, many of these projects lobbing into those top exchange for more fraud.

I'm satisfied with the present results from IEO fundraising, if you are serious about your project you should go for top exchanges, imagine if it's easy to go binance for IEO launchpad what do you think will happen? Scam and crappy projects will have free pass and IEO will be doomed just like ICO,..... IEO is perfect as the way it is.

In this day in age if you're not able to write up a whitepaper that invokes angel investors to get things rolling you likely don't have a team that is even capable of making a crypto currency that is worth anyone's time..
Successful crypto is innovative, and if you can't package the innovation you wish to develop into an easily digestible white paper that sells your idea, as mentioned above, you have no business in this space.

Any fucking idiot can clone a coin, change the name and a few parameters and launch it, claiming it's the next bitcoin and that it will make all involved rich.. But in reality if you can't even attract investors to get you off the ground.. lol


If it's an innovative idea, money will not be an issue.. If money is an issue, it's not innovative and thus doesn't need to be made.

Stop making shitcoins, stop whining you can't afford to list your shitcoin on exchanges.

Too many inexperience developers are building projects nowadays, they are here to raise fund and give less good results to investors, honestly I belief that good projects will always aim for better exchanges, that's my own believe, new projects should want the best for themselves, top exchanges is the answer

Many Project Failed At The End Because Of Low Project Innovative Ideas. You Must Ask Yourself, Why Do Some Project Conduct IEO On Binance And Others Do Not, Is It Because They Have Less Capital?  Is It Because They don't Know Bianace Team? NO, The Big Answer Is Low Innovative Ideas,  What Can Your Project Offer Outside Crypto Market Prices,  Look At Cartesi, Look At Harmony, Look at WaziX, And Many Others, All Did IEO On Binance But Their Innovative Ideas Skyrocket The Ecosystem.

IEO still works well, why new fundraising? Projects that failed nowadays are those that aren't well planned, to get listed for fund raising on binance the projects has to be so good that binance team will have no choice but to accept the project, the exchange team has reputation to protect and they make sure the new project is worth listing on their platform. IEO have my full support 💯

Many ICOs became scam and that really left a huge factor for most investors to stop investing in it until today, it's almost not working anymore. If you think of something easy to fund for new projects, sorry to say but there's nothing as such.
Most investors are afraid to invest unless something is cleared to them. The struggle is already attached for projects that are longing for funding.

More reason why projects should always define their goals and work with those goals accordingly. If you don't really have the funds and resources to list on the bigger exchanges, there are lots of class B exchanges a project can list on and still obtain maximum reach with the proper marketing. It makes no sense for any project to outdo themselves in the short term just because they want to list on a top exchange. Listing on a top exchange is no guarantee towards ensuring project growth or price appreciation. Lots of work still need to be put in place before success can be achieved.

For a project to be successful, it requires innovative ideas and a good team who have the ability to take a project from zero to higher. The team is certainly important to make a project a success.

The days of raising funds by copying someone else's project are over. If there is an innovation in your project, then the top exchanges will look for you to do ieo. You can see Binance's IEOs, why Binance has listed them.

I am hopeful that IEO market will develop better in coming months as many middle and small scale exchanges are also developing their IEO launchpad platforms, some have already developed and started listing IEOs, i think this is not only positive but very encouraging as well because this will promote healthy competition among these launchpads and also quality of IEO based projects will also improve as launchpads will pick one IEO at a time and also they will filter each project after complete due diligence because there reputation will be at stake as well.

When I saw the listing fee that Binance requires for new cryptocurrencies, so I'm no longer surprised that there are no new cryptocurrencies that are going to be listed there.

it's not a must to use top exchanges for ieo.. if  a company cant afford big exchanges for ieo then they should simply look for alternative exchange that they can afford.. it is not a must.. to raise funds with big exchanges.. and that doesn't guarantee the success of a project in anyway

Bithumb, Hotbit and Hoo exchange is listing projects without a fee but these are tokens that are considered with good potential and have increasing trading volume. It will be added to top exchanges if binance or Okex sees big profit when they are added.

To have a good number of investors the project doesn't just need to be listed on top exchanges but the project must have an innovative concept and not just because they said it is innovative while its obviously just a copy.

My answer is that project dev should stop sourcing for contributors through ICO, IEO etc. If you have a really novel project, try to seek for corporation by meeting individuals and corporate organisation that can help fund your projects. Every year, grant and funds are provided globally by corporate bodies to help great ideas. If you cannot find one, you better be ready to finance your project. There are many blockchain based project that do not source for funds through ICO or IEO and they are really doing well. In fact most of them are always successful compare to hundreds project that will end up turning shit after IEO.

Most recently, Cartesi held its successful IEO on Binance. It is worth noting that in order to raise funds for IEO, the campaign conducted a bounty program on the forum. Thus, an ICO can be considered as a fundraiser for an IEO or for listing on an exchange.

I think hoo exchange will do just fine for new projects, this new exchange has less listing fee and good IEO launchpad too, Probit is becoming a joke gradually because too many bad projects are getting listed on the exchange, hoo and bithumb will be the better choice

That's not so true, new projects are still using binance IEO launchpad, it depends on how good the project is, for binance exchange it's not always about having the money, the project must reach binance exchange taste to get listed too.

That's right IEO projects must be in the top exchanges if want to succeed, but it's not easy to enter the top exchanges. There are several
conditions that must be fulfilled, so only certain IEO projects can enter the top exchanges. That's a very good thing, so it makes it easy
for investors in choosing good IEO projects. I have several times invested new projects in binance exchange and most of them are profitable.
This proves that IEO projects in the top exchanges are indeed good.

We have exchanges with reputation and yet not a top exchange. If a project is sincere, they will attract a good community by their innovation and not trying to bring in another shit project to the market.

Any references for your list? How much fee these exchanges are charging for listing out a new coin/token with them? Moreover, I have never heard of hoo and probit in your above list. It is just a news that IEO is happening on these exchanges as well? When these exchanges themselves not popular enough how they keep attracting investors for their IEO? Probably they might be having good userbase but not having the trading pairs I usually to trade with could be one of the reason why I am seeing most of these exchanges as unknown 8).

and for that, I only invest in IEO held in binance because for other exchanges I see more that fail / just throw money away. especially those who do IEO on a small exchange

As long as that was reporting the real volume and that will always good for a new exchange site. Probit is a bad exchange and in this tier hoo is the best exchange site and then kucoin was also following it after hoo.
I personally prefer to list a new token into the small exchange like hoo. A new projects think for a tice to spend million dollars for major exchange site.

Why don't you try to get a partnership that can support funds for your project? I think it is a good way to get another source of funds. it is much better than you provide IEO on an exchange with a bad reputation. You must be careful to choose an exchange for IEO. If you choose the wrong exchange, then it leads to a lack of interest from people to buy your coins/tokens. Finally, you cannot meet the target if there is a lack of interest, unless just damage your project reputation and wasting your time.

Probit exchange is indeed one of the exchanges that often does IEO. Although not all IEOs can succeed, but most have succeeded in generating large funds. And for the price it depends on the project concerned. Until now, probit exchange is still doing IEO.

And that brought them to list for small exchanges and low market volume and that also brought the project to be ignored by investors and traders and soon to become dead. Getting listed into known and reputable exchanges is somewhat expensive at this time but as an owner of the project and wanting to succeed, they would likely proceed even though it cost high. Besides, they could also have a huge benefit from it as a return.
That makes sense if we don't think about having of huge expenses if we are aiming for a profitable market, it is much important is to keep alive all the time.

In short term, yes, because most investors in IEO now are short term investors, so they will only invest on projects that are going to be listed in big exchanges after the IEO so they can ensure profit, that's the problem, the way how people see the project makes the project fail.

However, if the altcoins market will return to its bullish status, I think that will pave the way for altcoins to grow even if not listed in big exchanges as long as the exchange is legit and reputable.

The only solution to this is more regulation, so scam IEO will not exist anymore.

Paving way for regulation could be good, but where would it be coming from? Will it be fro the government, such as their own financial regulatory body? or it will come from a privately voted body, under the umbrella of cryptocurrency and blockchain technology? Which is centralization vs decentralization?
I think this has been a thing of controversy for quite some time now.

Hard to implement the regulation part as no central authority is managing the crypto projects. And I don't see any governing body anytime soon. This is the reason why scammers are everywhere because they found this as a good breeding ground to rip money from the users without being responsible about it. So if a project can't afford to be included in the launchpads of top exchanges, just tap private investors and pitch your project to them. Because if you believe that you have a great and promising project, they will see your potential and might give you the funds that you need.

This is the same situation we had in the ICO market, most of the investors are here for the profits and not investing because they have a novel idea that could change the world and that is what we are seeing with the IEO market as people could not really trust holding these investment in the long term.

Regulation will help in eradicating the scams but it will not help in changing the mentality of the investors.

@OP If you have a project that is really going to make a sustainable business then people will invest in it and thereby will have the chance to list in top exchanges.

Yes, not all of them, that is why they need good marketing to find good and trusted partners or private firms to support or fund them along with their journey enable them to launch an IEO on a decent exchange. Launching an IEO on a sh*t exchange will not make things successful, not attractive to investors and it will worsen the situation and not good for the projects. Most probably it will fail if they launch on not well-known exchanges.

I think you have to be careful because a lot of scam cases occur from good projects. For example, a good platform that scams is a case of exchanging BCNEX, they have very good project plans, but now they are scamming and making lots of people losers because they cannot withdraw assets from the BCNEX exchange.

We don't need a new method!
It all depends on the project, if the project is good even though he does not have the funds to hold an IEO in a big exchange, it will not be a problem.
Big exchanges usually free the listing fees and fees for IEO if the project is really good.

I'm not sure if it's done by a big exchange. except for large projects or have been registered in several large markets first. they take into account the costs of being able to register and do an IEO on their exchange. nothing is for free. but if you can mention there is an exchange like that you can share it with others.

lol yeah , i paused a bit when i read he said free . how come is that possible  ? if listing on exchange is free then anyone can be listed on it and exchange will be bloated that much  .  good or bad projects both have no exception but they still must pay because creating and growing an exchange isnt also easy and cheap  plus exchange reputation is also at stake here  .   not all can afford listing on top exchange so its up to them if they need to collect more money and try again or choose lower quality exchange that have a cheap listing fee  .

The choosing of the exchange is a key factor that a project can survive a lot of time but I think the project viability in the long run will ultimately decide the project establishment. So, every team should come with a challenging project for their money pool in ICO or the IEO. If they are listing their coin within the reasonable time period then it will grab the investors faith. So, not look at the big exchanges only but you should have to work towards making your project better.

it is an option for projects that do not have a lot of development funds to be listed on large exchanges. but most projects like that, will not be able to develop long in the market. when their markets are not strong, they will die soon because many people leave their markets.

If the projects want to get a list on the big exchanges, the dev needs to pay a big fee which the dev doesn't want to spend it because they still new on the market. The dev will think about make another promotion for the project to the public so they can invite more investors, and if they can get more investors, that will mean they can have more money. At that time, maybe they can ask the big exchanges to list their project on the site, and they can pay the fee.

The best recourse is to go through a private sale if the project is good and it succeeds to get support coming from private sectors they can proceed to go through an IEO since they already have funds that they can use to their listing, some projects are already doing this with success.

I think the issue is not just about raising funds, people will always be willing to support a genuine start up project but the trust behind the people in charge of this project is in question, raising fund is one thing, actually utilizing the funds on something meaningful is another, the easiest way for project to raise funds was through ico, but that is all water under the bridge now because the bad majority have succeeded in ruining it for the good minority,

I can not think of any other way for project to raise funds, even if new ideas will come up, it will probably meet the same faith as ico because the greedy ones will still take advantage, so whatever idea that needs to be introduced should have some level of regulations.

New projects with serious team should be able to raise good money if they know what they are doing, serious team will no doubt want to keep their project alive by all means, they will be smart enough to choose a medium rated exchange instead of vindax, exmarket, sistemkoin etc

I myself also use several platforms, because to sell tokens that I get from the bounty is not available in one exchange, for now I am more active using the Binance and Indodax exchange.

True! However, a project is listed on a top exchange doesn't mean it's good and vice versa. A project is identified good or bad all based on their plans and the way the project team follows the plan! I'm now more interested in finding what a project plan is and how the team works than finding which exchange their token will be listed!!

If the project use cases are good enough top exchanges like binance won't decline their proposal, binance exchange is very serious with which ever project they will allow on their exchange, if your project isn't good enough they will decline.

I think this is case to case basis. However the result is astonishingly accurate. Most project listed on smaller IEO platform got rekt as investors are keep losing compared to bigger market such as Binance and Kucoin who enjoy the ROI of every projects that got listed. On the contrary, investors are leaving after the profits has been secured proven when you check their price months from now. Only few got retain their previous price.

There is a big differences between "all new projects" and "all good projects".

I mean that we never need to worry on all new projects and at the same time good projects will raise enough funds to pay fee for exchanges.

So, system already working in right manner. If a project fails to convince investors then it may need to get listed only on low ranked exchanges. But, I have seen in the times of peak ICO days, even the projects which had met hard cap, listing their tokens/coins into unknown exchanges or new exchanges.

Moreover, many exchanges are still allowing free of cost listing after voting or recommendation by a community. So, if a new project is good and reputed in terms of convincing real-world application then definitely it will get listed in to top exchanges at possible means.

These exchanges are still fair enough, some projects will manage to raise fund successfully on these exchanges, a day ago Oikos DeFi project sold out all three rounds of IEO on hoo exchange, its all about how good the project is

where did you get this information? give me an example of a project that is free listing and free IEO on the top exchange because I've never heard of this before

IMO, there is not much change.
ICO or IEO is almost the same.

Yes, they might be using exchange for proof of their existence but once it failed the same goes for investors buying all those coins.
They will go down with them.
Expense is one of the problem here. Top exchange are expensive and agreement might be too big like 50-50 for all the sold coins.
Which is why they won't agree with it.

Binance has a positive reputation for conducting IEO. If you compare their performance on the success of IEO with other exchanges, it is impossible to find a competitor for them. Therefore, every team that wants to get to the top should spend their IEO on the Binance exchange.

You shouldnt launch a project if you dont have money for normal IEO. IEO on shitty exchange will give you nothing and it will be only wasting time

raising new funds will only make investors think that the team of the project is not professional. however, it is only a matter of readiness. preparation before doing IEO, consideration of list costs at the top exchange, and others are strategies that need to be developed before doing IEO Well, many IEO fail because they only sell on one exchange, and the exchange is not popular.

Listing can be free if the project is really good, it's real.
Haven't you ever seen a big exchange do it ?

https://www.binance.com/en/support/articles/360038151092

Now it was only the turn of the developers to compete to make the project interesting and to be looked at by large exchanges.

Free listing depends on majority votes, it's not as easy as you said, the project must have enough supporters that will be ready to rank up the project through voting system on binance exchange and this vote listing isn't available every time, you can't expect all new projects to aim for free listing

Probit is easy, good choice for new projects but honestly better exchanges will bring better results, my advice is not to launch any project if you don't have money for better exchanges

Actually, this is very strange information about a free listing of a project on a banner. I am sure that binance made sure the prospects of the OGN coin before starting to work with this project and in my opinion this is an exclusive solution to Binance. any free listing is fraught with bad consequences, As an example, EtherDelta or ForkDelta, where free listing leads to clogging of the entire exchange with all kinds of tokens that have no value at all. There is a lot of information on the Internet that listing on exchanges costs from $ 50,000 to a million dollars, depending on the prospects of the project itself and on the rating of the cryptocurrency exchange.
But nevertheless, if projects have good chances in the future, then there are two options for the development of events, When developers will plan listing not on the most rated exchanges, but on less significant ones, in order to gain popularity among cryptocurrency users, and only then Plan listing on the most famous exchanges. Or, initially, raise money to pay for listing on the most rated exchanges, because Business is a business and the same rules apply everywhere.

Sometimes is gradual process, new projects lists on small exchanges but as time goes by they list of better exchanges, all this doesn't even matter much to me, I'm much interested in very good projects with good use case, the usability is what will attract investors

A good usability of the project can make the exchange sites interested to listed it for free. We have seen some new projects that being listed on several exchange site without even tried to apply to be listed on these exchange sites. Good usability will attract the demand and this will build a good community

There are other ease exchanges that new projects can get listed on, they have no fake volumes and their customer services are good enough, team just need to do their own research

Probit, bithumb, bigONE , upbit, etc

Bithumb is the leading exchange in Korea, so I think it will be very difficult for new projects if they want to be IEO at this exchange. Probit will probably be a more suitable option because I find their process a lot easier

So, on the one hand, it is kind of bad for the leigt hard-working projects that the fees for a listing a binance are quite high, but on the other hand it prevents most of the scam projects to get listed at a big exchange.

I like the fact that not all new projects can get listed on binance or okex, it means less scam projects will have the opportunity to scam investors on these top exchanges

It would have been a different story if we have less scam projects in crypto space, maybe binance and other top exchanges will give new projects the opportunity but getting listed on binance is more strict, CZ makes certain research on his own before allowing or approving new projects

The best advice I can give new developers is to hunt for top exchanges, the chance of raising hard cap is high when using top exchanges to raise funds, if team or devs can't afford big exchanges they are better off not releasing the project at all

New cryptocurrency projects think that they can get a huge amount of money by conducting IEO on such scam exchanges like p2pb2b, vindax, exmarkets and so on and so forth, but when the IEO of these projects comes to an end, these cryptocurrency companies are left with nothing because on such scam cryptocurrency exchanges it is impossible to achieve a good result, therefore, each company needs to somehow find money from the very beginning to conduct IEO at least on a on mid-level exchanges in order to collect at least softcap.

If a particular project is a good one, then the investors as well as the bounty hunters will be looking to hold the tokens for the long term. Also, the exchanges won't be having any issues in listing the tokens in their platform. But in case of 99% of the projects, exchange listing is considered very important. And the reason is very obvious. Investors have very little faith in them.

The difference between ICO and IEO is that scams have reduce significantly because during ICO there were many scam projects floating around and also now you need to have a sound idea, not just that you will go and copy another project idea and copy paste their whitepaper. I believe if your idea is sound and the project has good developers behind it, it would definitely be listed on big exchange

Dont mind the fee first but actually you should put up attention into these factors before
doing such step.

    A realistic business model
    Cutting-edge technologies
    A minimal viable product (MVP)
    A Token
    A strong team backing the project
    A reasonable hard cap
    Initial investors’ buzz
    A project website for marketing purpose (optional but recommended)

source: https://blog.sagipl.com/how-to-launch-a-successful-ieo/

Getting approved into your application do matter most but it do really need up into these qualities.

There are different reasons why its good to go for top exchanges

1. Projects that go on top exchanges are easily trust by investors
2. There are more investors on top exchanges that will surely invest in your project
3. You will easily raise your hard cap target
4. Top exchanges provide all the needy, e.g volumes and enough liquidity

Fact is many scam developers have no money to run their scam projects and they usually end on small exchanges like p2pb2b, some projects are so bad that they will never work out unless you don't do your research on them, I've seen many projects failed since 2018 because the team have no good plan for the project, going small exchange is bad honestly

Projects these days apply for grants. If you have a good project which contributes so well towards the adoption of blockchain technology, to get a grant can be very easy to get. Manwhile such grant can be used to get a place on a good exchange. although, to get such a  aid, the project must have good comunity support.

Deserve top any exchange big ideas of any projects. If IEO reduces significant scam projects than what was the last project, which was successful by only ICO. Now low volume exchanges are helping scam people to raise funds. If slowly most coins die, then most of these low volume exchange IEO coins could die

The fee friendly exchanges out there that will charge little fee for listing IEO's are literally having small volumes and investors and this is the reason why most low capital project do raise a little amount and perform wholefully again listing on exchanges. I believe people just have to do more research about any project There're  interested in because only start-ups that with good and strong backing s survives now

l think it is really more nice chance for new projects to afford top exchanges. That is why new projects which are in the top exchanges are more trusted by investors than others in small exchanges. It can help you to make something better like more investors who are interested in investing in the project. No doubt most people were damaged by ICO scam projects, but to be on the top exchanges can help you to be trusted by investors.

Upbit has very difficult requirements compared with other exchange sites. I think bithumb is much more friendly compared with upbit. I think a small project will be so difficult to list its token in one of these exchange sites.

I still go for the project's potential and what it can bring to the market, going to the top exchange is a good option for a new project but if it has a hard time with the listing fee and the cost, he can opt for a much cheaper exchange while building his reputation and developing the project.

Recently I saw some new DeFi startups with no ico/ieo but has a really good price and volume on dex exchange, what a new project really need is supporters and proper marketing strategies to boost your project some others use crypto vloggers to share those projects and I think its more effective to encourage large investors to join and invest, new projects dont need top exchanges to provide more liquidity you can also use the power of dex like uniswap look at this one for example 4 days after launch on dex and has $600k yesterday https://uniswap.info/pair/0x966053ca4fca049173eb1f27e4cb168ccb794534   

It is true that IEO projects are far better compared to ICO projects, but the success of IEO projects depends on exchanges.
If it is not listed on the top exchanges, it is indeed quite difficult to attract investors and also the reality is not all IEO projects
can afford top exchanges. That becomes a serious problem to raise funds, no need to worry that every problem there is a way out.
Actually there are several ways to raise funds, one of them by creating a bounty campaign. In my opinion quite effective promotion
with bounty campaign to raise funds.

the top exchange is the best decision for a new project to strengthen its market from the start. but when listed on a cheaper exchange it will make their market very easy to collapse. the considerations depend on how they make their markets grow and not fall. because for new projects that experience bad market conditions it will be very difficult to control their markets.

I always believe that the quality of project determines its future, these days crypto community is smart enough they don't want to be involve in a pump and dump project anymore unfortunately some big exchanges are doing this just for making money and their popularity attracts people to get involve in their provided ieo I have seen many quality projects ieo on some small exchanges which was unsuccessful because people are addicted to trust on the ieo of big exchanges and I don't think it will change.

It's the best choice but it needs a lot of money. Binance charges more than 3 million dollars for a new token to be listed on binance exchange site. Some projects were raising a lot of money able to do this but the small projects can't

Really ? How do you know that? I don't think binance has ever talked about listing prices to the public, I see a few coins listing in binance and their volume is not up to 3 million dollars per day, so I think $3 million just for listing is too expensive.

indeed, only the place of exchange that has a good reputation will still be used to do IEO because they are risking the good name of the place of exchange to provide information about coin offers through the IEO method, so when they want to give IEO, the place of exchange must be truly selective.

Look it up,,, they have talked about it but their claim is that they never charge any listing fees at all, they instead call it management fees to charge for the work and due diligence.

Bullshit mainly as I myself have seen replies from exchanges including Binance in the past. Maybe now they are not so blatant about it!

That's how investors see opportunities, once IEO being offered to a good exchange many will participates and take
part, while if the project being held to unknown exchange
Only small support or most of the time it won't be supported, it's a mentality that circulating around this industry
good exchange gives reputations to introductory project.
Nowadays, if the team don't have enough funds to compete placing their project to a well known exchange the chance
of surviving is really small, they needed to plan very well
before taking part to this business.

That is true and no one expects them or makes it mandatory for them to list on top exchanges as a start but if they have the funds and still wishes to then it's a welcome idea. In my own opinion, the first thing that matters is what the project is bringing, once it is a good one and the team have shown their eagerness to keep working then going for medium exchanges will also help to give them a good result because every exchange appreciates good projects. So in essence, if a project don't have the neccessary funds for top exchanges they should list out other medium exchanges that falls within their expectations, then narrow it down by comparing the success rate of IEO on those exchanges, this I think will help them make the right choice.

This is a true perspective when we consider new projects, but if all new projects cannot afford top exchanges, then they should avoid mediocre exchange platforms because it totally ruins the project without a hope of resurrecting.

To solve this, projects need to be patient before delving into crowdfunding situations, get into the best exchange for their ieo and that lays a good foundation for success

i think for now if we comparing ICO and IEO is not fair mate
anyway if we look back, a lot of big project born from ICO,, and tradeable on top exchange too
i hope someday the glory of ICO will coming back in crypto space ;)

I believe all the new projects that I want are listed in the top exchanges in this market, but to be listed there is very difficult. They need to spend a lot of money on listing fees, and their project must be really good and have a large community of support. It is really too difficult for new projects

One prominent issue with some project team is that they see a top exchange platform as the pinnacle of suceess for their crypto currency projects.

A good exchange platform for a nee project should be an icing on a cake which the project will thrive upon, it should not be otherwise.
listing onntop exchange does not equal good price which is why work should be done on the project product to experience good returns

time has passed. each system has its period. ICO with their glory and IEO also with their current glory. we will not compare it all because after all ICO gave birth to many big projects as well.

Being listed on a exchange as an coin isn't all about the money. Exchanges also look at the reputation of the project. Because if they don't and the coin turns out to be a scam then that exchange that listed it will face the consequence. So if you look at Binance the coins there is quality. Because you need money and trust to get listed.

that's true but that needs a lot of qualifications especially from the product must be audited but the agreement between the exchange and dev will also discuss how much fees that must be paid by the team as a part of requirements.

As far as I know it is difficult to be listed at Binance, they have a strict process for selecting new projects. In addition to the fees listed there are very expensive, I heard some people say they need to pay $ 2 million to be listed if the project meets their requirements.

If new projects can't afford listing money for top exchanges they should find less costly exchanges, this doesn't mean the project will end up badly, the success of a project depends on the team professionalism

Binance is not a must for new projects, many projects don't get listed on binance and they are performing very well than binance listed projects, just find good exchange with zero fake volume and focus on future development to rise up your project

can be said that the reputation of the ICO has been bad, most investors are currently reluctant to invest in ICO again for several reasons including the risk of losing money in the ICO. but I think the presence of IEO slightly reduces the risk of fraud and is good for IEO who can do funding at the top exchanges like Binance or Okex.

it can be step by step but it will give a very good impression for the project that can afford to be listed on good exchange sites. We know that investors were putting exchange sites above the development progress and this is the reality

If the project's team is sincere with their goals, they can always start in a small decent exchange.
The fee that they will allot to top exchanges can be dedicated to their developments instead.
Without good progress on their platform, they can't pull it off in exchanges.
I prefer to have working platform with active users rather than go for top exchanges and fail to maintain their market because they have no strong use case.
So the project should not worry about getting listed in those top exchanges but worry about their actual developments.

There is something about business, presentation matters a lot. And that's what we are talking about here, the way you present your business in this cryptocurrency market matters a lot, same as the way you present it in real life. In real life if your shop is not kept clean, people won't like to buy from you and when it comes to cryptocurrency, if you're making use of an exchange that doesn't look so good, people still won't be interested.

My advice to those that are running these projects would be that they shouldn't go for it until they have been able to raise enough funds that will be enough to start their business. It doesn't make sense that you start and end up on a useless exchange and expect your investors to start making use of that exchange just because your project is there, no it sounds stupid.

IEO is only good when it is held by the leading exchanges in this market. If you participate in IEO of small exchanges in this market such as Probit, Hotbit, chainx ... Then I believe it will be like ICOs, the price will fall hundreds of times and make you lose.

True! I don't trust to invest in any ICO projects at all! I may take a look if IEO projects are held by leading exchanges. However, in the near future, I don't have a plan to invest in any IEO projects yet. Most of ICO and IEO projects are scammed or trash projects that just take away our time and money.

Why small exchanges? It's better not to release your project at all, small exchanges will bring nothing but bad influence, I wish every new developers can go through screening or something, we will see that not all developers know what they are doing, they are here for money

Exactly, small exchanges and no volumes will kill new projects. I saw a lot of projects like that, they tried to list them at small exchanges but in the end the price collapsed many times and no one invested in it, gradually dev team also abandoned the project and create other projects.

These happen all the time in this industry, once their project failed they create new. Some project can't afford to be listed in a big exchange and ended up in a small exchange only. It usually happens price collapsed once no improvement on their project that's why we must observe the market before we invest.

So true, there are many exchanges available, it's left for new project team to make their choices but the truth will remain the same, if you want success so badly for your project you should be wise enough to go top exchanges or good exchange

I think good exchaanger may be one fact here but their maybe another fault from team. Their roadmap, their subjects of project, token value and finally arrangement. But yes if any team wailing to make success an IEO they must come with big investment and if they have scamming mentality they should not.

thanks.

Investing in ICOs and IEOs at the moment is stupid, You can buy them for a lot cheaper after they are listed at exchanges. At the moment, you should only invest in top altcoins in this market, it is much safer than ICOs and IEOs.

Investors are actually going to be investing if they see the project worth investing in.  A week ago many investors are grabbing Oikos token in hoo.com exchange as they did an IEO there. Although the price of BTC isn't going up, traders are up to invest a lot of projects in crypto. The Chinese are more aggressive in investing in their exchanges and this is why more Chinese exchanges are suddenly coming out from the shadows.

Top exchange ensures liquidity and big investors. It's true that many projects can not afford top exchange but you also have to understand that those exchange can not list and shit project in their exchange because that will ruin their reputation. I think nowadays probit, Latoken this type of exchange became very popular among new crypto projects and I think there is nothing bad in that.

Cryptocurrency exchanges derive revenue: Commissions: Exchange charges a fee per trade, accumulating revenue as more users trade more money. Which Cryptocurrency Exchange has the Lowest Fees among pure crypto exchanges, Binance has the lowest fees.

investment may start crowded. but not for projects listed on the small exchange. or projects that sell their IEO on a small exchange. of course, there are considerations of the best exchanges for doing IEO. it will get support from strong communities and markets. it will be good for the stability of the price of the token.

This is one of the few reasons why I trust binance, they are very careful before taking up a project to list on their exchange platform, it's not always about the money, it's more about the quality of projects

only good projects, have quality products and have large funds that can be listed at the top of the exchange. Such project criteria usually bring great success in the market. Project teams and project partners have a large influence on the success of a project, especially for IEO listed on the main exchange.

Not all projects need to be in a top exchanges for it to be considered as a good project. Some projects still works out even in a not so famous exchanges. Sometimes it's better to take step by step process in order for somethings to work. As time pass by and the usefulness of a project can be seen, in time, it will be on top exchanges too, that will still happen if the team behind it and the goal of the project can be meet and achieve.

 

They prioritize the quality of the projects. If the projects are of good quality and have products, they will list them in exchange.If they do not have enough money to pay for binance then I believe that Binance will open a contest of votes among projects.

There has more successful chance a project if want IEO progress in popular exchange. Even not few because there has lots of investors in popular exchange. In my opinion if a project want alive long term then their need popular exchange for increase investors, volume, and price.

For new, but also existing projects, lisiting on an exchange like Binance can be way to expensive.
If, for instance, a project chooses not do do an ICO or pre-mine the likelyhood of a starting capital is slim.
And with the low volumes of money flowing through the whole of this cryptospace the last couple of years many coins will stay in this difficult situation.
Take a project like BCZ (BitcoinCZ), skillful DEV team, in front regions of development.....but little money to get to the big league of Exchanges.
Crypto as a whole should be working towards more adoption.
On the otherhand i am more for decentralized exchanges taking the lead instead of exchanges like Binance being centralized.

Listing on binance is way too expensive for new projects, it will be easier for those new projects that have private investors, they can easily arrange for funds to list on top exchanges, it's just advisable to build crypto projects when you are fully ready and qualified

That's why a lot of projects are looking for alternative exchange sites to replace binance as another option. Even binance dex was also putting very strict requirements.
Major exchange sites are the things that are not so many developers can afford them instantly.

if the project is not able to do an IEO in the top exchange, the way to solve the problem is just to attract a few large investors and several large partners, I mean they have to take part in some blockchain events first, after they have enough funds they can register on a large exchange to start IEO

It's really hard now for low capital start up because it all depends on the exchange you are able to afford to list your IEO on as people prefer to trust the decision of major exchanges such as binance, okex, kucoin and gate.io in choosing quality project for IEO's due to too many bad choices they've made personally when it comes to choosing project to invest in.

The exchanges have become greedy middlemen. I think to list a coin at Binance you have to pay them 2 million dollars, or some ridiculous number like that. It just feels like such a waste, money that should go into the project. Bitcoin in the beginning wouldn't had been able to listed in the begining.

ICO, STO or IEO is just a kind of fundraising methode
and i think for now IEO is the best methode, but only if the IEO running on top exchange like binance
the issue is not with the methode, but the team because if they want to reach the cap
the team must serious with their project and bring new ideas and features to their project
i believe even they choose an ICO as their fundraising methode a lot of investors will drop their money, the key is trust  ;)
i hope someday the glory of ICO will comeback

It's true that all new project team can'tt afford top exchanges because of those exchanges are so much expensive but they can launch their IEO From mid ranged exchange like Kucoin, Hitbtc, Houbi, probit. This action can increase the chance of IEO's Success

The main thing is not in the Exchange, but in the concept because if we know that even a large Exchange can only survive at the beginning, it cannot provide many benefits, so the important thing is that the main concept becomes an important point. Paying exchanges is also not cheap right now, as you mentioned

Of the four intermediate exchanges that you said, only Probit has received many IEO programs from new projects and the average tokens are also listed there, besides none and even just one or two projects have managed to make IEO in Kucoin, and for Hitbtc and Huobi I have never seen IEO there again.

probit at this moment be most favourite exchanges for new projects. most of them now listing there , and slow but sure it will influence probit reputation in cryptocurrency market. new project that want to list in best exchanges such as binance or huobi it will take long time till their team review its quality good enough or not.

not a quality problem for the project. if the project is already good their problem is the cost of making a sale or listing on an exchange. lower cost is the choice. and of course, for a good project. they have to do a very tight event to boost their rapidly growing trade.

It was their choice to choose low-cost, low-cost exchanges as long as tokens could be listed on the exchange, but strong and large projects they would continue to do their best to develop with sufficient funds they would definitely be listed on the exchange more.

In my opinion, most investors choose to take part in the IEO and that too is done in large markets. Because they feel safer when they are about to spend money. As for if there are alternatives other than IEO in large markets, I think using the trusted Escrow service can be a solution.

Not all exchanges are unaffordable, there are both new and old exchanges that are good enough if you can't afford exchanges like binance and Okex, how about bithumb or upbit or even Probit? They are affordable and better than useless exchanges like p2pb2b

One advantage with IEO is that the promoters can't accumulate the funds and then vanish all of a sudden. If the project doesn't reach the soft-cap, then the funds will be returned to the investors. But the problem is that once the token gets listed, it can't give any guarantee about the continued development of the project. After the listing, the exchange doesn't have any power over the project.

What about if those new projects stop asking for millions of dollars when they have yet to write a single line of code? That would be a welcome change if you ask me, bitcoin the most popular coin in the market by far was created by satoshi without the need of an ico or an ieo, do you want me to believe that since then developers need millions of dollars just to make their projects when most of the time their work is based on the work already done by satoshi? I do not buy it, and many investors seems to think the same as well as the popularity of those projects has dropped considerably during the last years.

This is also a huge business. If IEO is listed in any big exchange, it creates a positive aspect in everyone. This is because they know that if they fail for any reason, their funds will be refunded. But the problem starts after the listing, the pump and dump game continues as the team pays more attention to the pump dump than to the development. So if team don't do development, the exchange can't have much impact after ieo.

I am always of the mindset that IEO must not be on top exchanges, yes there are team who can afford it and there are others that can't, so those that cannot does it mean they should fold up their ideas? NO, rather they can go for other exchanges first. Also, the only challenge facing most projects is that they don't have any applicable use case thus when investors see them they tend to turn the other way. Which then means that, once a project have an applicable use case it can have a successful IEO on any exchange. Lastly, other exchanges that I think are friendly in terms of IEO are Probit, Bithumb and Kucoin.

In some cases the amount that already raised have not returned to the investors as the exchange sites were still launching the token to be traded on the exchange site. Any platforms have its own policy and that depends on the agreement that has already created before.

to be listed at the best exchange is indeed very difficult because it requires a very large capital, whereas to enter the exchange where the class is still middle is enough but the trading volume will certainly be small because usually the whales and investors prefer trading at the exchange which has a high trading volume.

I agree! Not all new project can afford that. However, all of them probably will try as hard as they can to achieve that goal! Being listed on a high-trading volume Exchange (or large Exchange) helps a lot in attracting investors and participants. Therefore, I think there's no one will refuse it!

That's is why there are smaller CEX exchanges where they can list on, not a must for all projects to list on either binance or other top exchanges, there are dex exchanges with good volumes, funds raising might not be a good idea because investors might think that they are scammers, if you don't have a solid project that people will invest in or you don't have fund to finance it, it's better for such person to stay out of it so that investors will not loose money

That's why Probit is losing its reputation bit by bit, if the exchange team keeps allowing anyhow projects on their exchange the exchange will lose its rank in crypto space to other small exchanges, upbit and bithumb are marginally better than Probit exchange in terms of picking IEO projects

We are seeing the reality, it's given that not all can afford to get their project listed for an IEO in top exchanges.
Just like a real market, there are big projects and there are small projects, when we talk of top exchanges, that entails big money, so it's not possible all can afford. The worst case here is if investors will only judge the project in short term, then most likely they will see that projects listed in small exchange has less chance to be successful.

Maybe what we are waiting here is the altcoins season, because the last time it happened, investing in altcoins are very profitable and I don't know if we ever experience that again but I'm hoping we will.

Binance should reconsider there ways if of a truth they use to collect such amount from heir clients during the listing, this will some how defeat the purpose of getting good projects for listing. Those projects with good prospects should be accepted and treat as such without frustrating them out of business because of huge amount involve in the listing. Binance should ensure to help good projects get listing in their exchange. This will enhance credibility and transparency in the whole process of the projects.

To get a good listing on an exchange, there are only a few options available. Either a large investor comes to the project and pays for the listing, or the team independently raises money using the bounty. This was recently done by carthusia, which after the ICO held an IEO on the Binance exchange.

ICO or IEO, the initial financing is important for the project and if it is not for them to obtain self-financing or without the need for community funding, the project will not see the light.
IEO will make things more difficult for scammers, but it does not a ticket for non scamming.
Therefore, you can lose your money if you trust that they are guaranteed and not just fraudsters.
you should try investing.

How can they try if the project does not have enough budget to develop? Those projects do not have any other options, they can only deploy IEO in small and medium exchanges. And it is these small exchanges that are killing new projects because investors are not interested in IEOs on this small exchange.

Well, you can’t have both at a time. You will have to be choosing one out of the two, either you choose ICO or IEO. Big exchanges knows what it costs them to reach that level they are now and they won’t doing anything for you for a penny, they will be charging huge for it. The good thing is that you will always see the difference between making use of the bigger exchanges and the smaller exchanges, there will always be a difference there.

Although I don’t think ICOs are dead, despite all these things that have happened, you will still see lots of ICOs, and there are still good ones. By saying this, I do not mean you can go for ICO for profitable experience. It is still up to you and purely depending on your due diligence. All the projects who could not convince big exchanges, may still prefer this platform for crowdfunding; if they're having good reasons then we can support them; I guess no big mistake in that.

That has become the sad reality that every project should accept, they will have to take a chance in ICO if they cannot afford an IEO or they cannot get in the top exchange for IEO,  they will have to rely in the reputation of their project, on how the team manage to convince investors to invest even if they are running in ICO platfrom.

Hey. I wouldn't say that we can be talking about all altcoins at once. From my point of view, much depends on the concrete platform/token and its particular prospects. And it is important to differentiate. Because again, only own and concrete analysis allows to get an objective overview

Afternoon. I absolutely share your views here. And talking about you, are there many promising tokens and platforms you are now following and can recommend? I only have 2 or 3 most advanced ones I am aware of, so always interesting to get a real recommendation

Well, the one I can definitely recommend you to have a look at is Centric token. This is entirely new standards on the field with really saturated roadmap

Exciting, but can you please share more details on the solution, please?

Of course, yes. Centric is the world's first dual-cryptocurrency payment network. Its innovative and unique concept is engineered to achieve breakthrough as a reliable form of payment. But better Google them to have a closer look

One mistake projects of today do is that they focus too much on how much their token would worth; instead of focusing on how much value their product would bring.

If you have a good working product ;top exchange platforms would offer you a chance to list without stress and that aside, anywhere your project lists, it demands great volume.

working product will be main factor that be recognation from exchange to take decision is it appropriate or not list to them. reputable exchanges now not based on how much fee they will list. for example binance  , they already make statement that will not list project if have no quality although he courage to high fee.

this is true,.. even the project was successful they cannot afford as well to list on top exchanges due to exchange payment that is very high.. but i think even the exchange fee is high as long as the project is good its worth it

Issues about exchanges needs to be done right if not it will likely affect the project, hence the reason for good team. Of course not all new projects can afford starting their project on top exchanges, yet there are those who started on a smaller but good exchange before going higher. Also, I see it that projects with good ideas hardly bothers about exchanges reason is that, they always start by seeking for funds via private sale, thus having a palatable ground to seek for the exchange which will help them achieve a good IEO and in most cases their first choice isn't always top exchanges. So in other words, if the project is good, let the team start with private sale before IEO.

Each project can try their luck in Binance listing vote contest. At least a try does not cost anything. Kucoin and crex24 have loyal prices for listing. And of course you can always try crappy p2pb2b or similar, where listing doesnt cost a penny. Last but not least - forkdelta always have open doors for newcomers :)

The new projects to be exist in the market is not mandatory to go for a top exchange rather they need to work on the project itself which do better in long term and must have to provide a unique service to the user. Then only the demand of the project growing hence the token also backed by this. So, the team member first of all should work on the project the decide to top exchanges gradually.

Looks like this guy is using 2 accounts and is talking to each other. And the conversation of these two accounts has nothing to do with this topic, hoping someone can handle him because he is trying to spam in this forum.

There are still exchanges out there that has good reputation and most IEOs out there can be listed. It's like a kick starter to get you going on the market. When when the token's price pumps, then you can list it to another exchange. Being flexible on the market is key for success.

It is hard to imagine how some top exchanges ask for ridiculously high listing fees for projects to list their coin in the exchange. Listing fees of top exchanges that reach up to a million-dollar is just big that could be used by project in other ways. These high listing fees do not help small projects in any way.

I think if they don't have enough fund, then they shoundt launch any project. Cause we can see, many projects launched their IEOs on low quality exchanges, Afterward they get scam. That's make no sense. So never invest any IEOs without top exchange

Not just lack of funds. There are bigger reasons behind this. The big exchanges check a lot before listing an IEO, so there is nothing to hide from the project and can not think of scam. So they don't list ieo in big exchanges but list their ieo on small exchanges in order to make people fool.

The exchange shows a picture of how the project's seriousness in achieving its objectives and top exchange as a support for its success. All projects want the top exchange by displaying it on their site that the application is in progress. Unfortunately, the top exchange has its own eligibility criteria that a crypto will be approved is on the list.

Achievement of fundraising targets cannot be forced if the project does not have attractive objectives even if it ultimately extends the sales schedule. As a result, new projects are only able to be listed in small exchanges and listing applications on the top exchanges will remain forever in the progress  until the project stops operating. The only way to get funds easily is that their goals must be really interesting, their ideas must be completely new. We are only limited to supporting them in terms of promotion, nothing more. For results, their own ideas are decisive.

As long as the IEOs are not launched on the low tier or even scam tier exchange site like p2p, latoken, coinsbit, chainx, vindax and that will have a good future.
A new listing can't be done instantly and that needs a lot of consideration from the new exchange site.

Agreed, they have it backwards, but this because they know very well they are not capable to create a valuable product, they know they will create a coin that is just like the other thousands of coins that we have in the market and as such the only chance they have to make money for themselves is that their coin shows positive growth at least for some time so they can attract some investors to their coin, but as we know this very difficult to achieve unless they get access to the top exchanges which is why they are always trying to figure out for a way to get in those exchanges without having to pay the necessary fee for it.

true, not all projects are capable of listing coins on a  exchange or large exchange the opposite happened Most projects afford listing a small market because funds that can be when IEO is minimal, better to choose IEO with a large partner and have personal capital

Its now has been 4 years since I am a crypto user and I can claim that I did not use any of them except Probit. I've heard about Bithumb after their big loss caused by hack, but thats it.
For a fresh new project that could mean - get ready to face very little demand and most of the times it has nothing to do with actual usability of the product

I do not understand why top exchanges didn´t adjust the listing fees for the new IEO projects. They still collecting same amount of money like in 2017, but the difference is that investors do not invest even one-tenth of what they invested in 2017.  ::)

IEO is probably the easiest way to generate fund, everything the developers are looking for is all there, Trust Hype and exchange support and this is what makes the project looks great when it comes to crowdfunding Trust is very important.
Unless there is new crowdfunding that can generate trust among investors I don't see other crowdfunding can equal IEO mechanism projects should raise initial funds so they can do IEO in the most trusted exchange that they can get into.

the quality and brand of each exchange are different, because of that the fee will be different. however, I think that every project has the opportunity to list on popular markets, it's just that they don't want to work on it and are quickly satisfied when their tokens have been traded on several unpopular exchanges.

New project looking for cheapest fees exchange for listing their coin on IEO or trading time, they will choose an exchange like probit, p2pbx exchange, latoken and many small exchange for listing their coin, but when we find with new project brave for listing on bigger exchange will make many investor are interested for investing on their coin, they will be glad with new project have listed with bigger exchange.

Registering in a large exchange also requires a lot of money and we ourselves must know that actually if our project is good and in terms of good communication it can get that exchange easier, in my opinion the most important thing for each project is to develop and focus on the products they offer

some good exchanges don't charge fees for doing IEO or listing on their exchanges, just make sure your project has advantages and good development then they will accept your project and promote it.

They are with a very professional team that is able to create the best products and be able to be accepted in the community so that it will be easier if there is a lot of support from the community.

Many projects now use fake teams to trick investors into buying their tokens during sales.

The solution?stop ICO and IEO and let people here return to traditional trading in which we can use our skills and Knowledge ,and we are the one who will be responsible in our own losses and not these scammers.
That is one stupid idea,Listing with High price and then in the end the project still scam?they are just capitalizing the system just to let their scamming legitimate.

Probit is one off top choice of the up and coming project to host for their IEO so I won't get disagree with your choice but I don't really about the other exchanges you mentioned but recently OIKOs has successfully concluded their IEO in hoo, but that is the first time I have heard about, while in bithumb there are some projects didn't really turned out well as expected.

Probit exchange still have past bad histories on the projects that did IEO on the exchange, it's not too bad and it's not too good at the same time and hoo exchange only perform very good with their first IEO which was OIKOS project, we never know how projects will perform later on Hoo exchange

Actually you know what? this is one kind of scamming chain process from them. They don't need to bear a large amount of money to list their project on Low rank exchanges. Then they scam & launch another project & continue to scam investors. This is a common way, they made money

Determined team who knows exactly what they want for their project will never use shit exchange or low rated exchanges, this is not ICO but IEO and for IEO project to be attractive to investors and become successful the project must use very good exchange

Wrong,Because even if they will use cheap and not popular exchange yet it is not enough reason to tag them as shit.
Because there are some exchange that Legit but only starting so far and they need good listing to prove how they are trust worthy and competent in this market.
Of course there are so many cases but still there are some who is trusted even though they are not listed in Huge exchange.

It all depends on the developer of the project itself if they choose the right place such as a large exchange with a real amount of volume that can have an impact on the success and investment members can also influence the success of the project

And all the exchanges are having record collection on trading fees as the userbase is growing so automatically does the trading fees that the exchanges earn from the users and never should we forget the withdrawal fees that they take, it is always too high compared to a normal transaction form our own private wallet. The ICO hype is over now because of a lot of ICO frauds that happened in 2017 along with the loss of investors by investing in projects that didn't even got listed on the exchanges, because of this IEO offerings were started and those initial ones did a great job and provided handsome returns to the investors.

Currently with the market situation in the past 2 years, it is very difficult to attract investors. And the cost to list IEO on leading exchanges is huge so not many projects can meet it.
The only way I see now is that they self-finance and develop the project step by step, then look for capital from private equity funds.

Your recommendation is right they should do private crowdfunding and the funds generated from private sales can be used to fund the project, on your former suggestion, yes developing the project first is also good like what they are doing now on Idena, they are developing the project so when the platform is fully set up they can use it to nominate their project in listing to big exchanges.

It seems that many don't know that top exchanges aren't always 100% a must, I knew some mid rated crypto projects that are still well developed today and they never listed on binance or okex and they are doing so fine, new projects that suffers good funds for development still have hope if the team are serious

New projects can survive and do well in the market without top exchanges, teams should just find the Exchanges that suits them, I believe that new project teams know what they are doing if they choose small exchanges, this still doesn't mean the project is bad

Yes It is unfortunate that money talks, and can get you big exchange listing. Usually if an alt has a community and some decent volume exchanges are more likely to give it a shot.

listing on the top exchange requires a large fee. projects have to spend a lot of money if they want to, but most projects don't want to, this is a good exchange only list by top projects

If a project can't afford to be listed they probably shouldn't be making Anns and going public. If you don't have the money for a website to start up and are using free hosting then how can people trust you? You need to have the funds upfront. It shows you have planned. Many places that rely on advertising wait till they get their payment before paying their users and this is wrong. If you cannot afford to do what you need to do then you shouldn't be doing it, to begin with. However, I can understand if someone has a very good idea but not enough funds to be listed. I don't think it is an altogether bad idea to not be listed. Being listed encourages people to dump rather than true believers. Your project should have a use for the coins it uses and then people won't need to have an exchange to dump on.

The growing popularity of IEO makes many new exchangers who do IEO and this in my opinion requires caution. Large exchangers will certainly carry out rigorous verification of projects that are listed, while small exchangers sometimes do IEO too often so that they seem just to get a fee

l do agree with your view on that, most investors prefer to take part in the IEO, that is why they think IEO is safer than ICO. They are tired of ICO scam projects. Maybe that is the reason for preferring IEO so a lot. That doesn't mean there is not any bad project of IEO, but much better than ICO. That is absolutely right to use the trusted Escrow service can be the best choice, because there is just a little thing in which we can avoid our money from scammers.

Well, the problem with registering on popular exchanges is that the price is very expensive. in fact, some of the regulations may be strict enough that the tokens you put in there can be delisted at any time when you violate them. Well, however, the popular exchange is not suitable for projects that want to develop half-measures.
in fact, if a project strives for it, I think all projects have their own opportunities.

Indeed, IEO is already considered bad for investors because the results are no longer appropriate, many garbage projects that only want to get funding and run away do not take care of their projects anymore. But to solve this problem, actually, the only exchange that made this IEO even more professional was to filter the seeds of new project seeds that really had quality, not just for fundraising. There are still many markets now that hold IEO and many are successful as I always follow, namely Hoo Exchange, providing good profits for traders there. So hopefully investors still want to glance at IEO again at this time.

It's never going to happen anyway, top exchanges becomes top exchanges because they have good reputations and that's something they don't want to ruin by taking in new projects that aren't reliable, once they do mistake once or twice they are going down.

If they haven't planned the listing of the project I think the team shouldn't start asking for funds.

They can always go back to basic of ICOs however this is a hard way for now. As you can see this method has been hate by most investors and traders now, due to a lot of scammed projects that had happened in the past by this. But I dont think ICOs are just bad, but we can rarely see a project that will be succesful now on ICOs. The analogy of IEO is good but honest to goodness only projects with money can join top markets for this. Yes they can, but as you explained it maybe you are right, insisiting on listed IEO on low exchanges only resulted to worse one.

This problem is not just related to new projects but for existing projects too. Exchanges are a blight on the industry and the fees they think are reasonable are anything but. I have personally seen listing fees of over $1M plus wanting 10% of the coins supply it’s absolute madness. Prior to 2017 listing fees were pretty reasonable but once the ICO age hit they got extremely greedy and started charging huge fees because all these ICO projects were sat on millions of $’s so they spent massive amounts of their budgets on them. Those days are done yet exchanges haven’t got the message so are trying to find new ways to extract massive amounts of cash from projects which seems to be these IEO’s now. They don’t care about the fundamentals of a project in most cases they only care about what makes them a nice pot of cash.

For existing projects that are trying to do things properly, that didn’t have an ICO or any of that rubbish it puts them in a awkward position. Do they blown their entire budget just to secure one big exchange listing or do they use that money towards development? You would think that some people would see the nobility in a project trying to do things the proper way, the way crypto was started, through hard work and delivering products but nope that’s not the case at all. These exchanges have brainwashed people into thinking if it’s not listed there then it’s a shitcoin scam and must be avoided yet probably 90% of the projects they list have absolutely no working products. It’s sad to see how far the industry has moved away from the ideals it was built on.

hoo exchange place in my opinion is still classified as a new exchange place, do you know that there are some exchange places that have an exchange place program and currently an exchange place that has an IEO program becomes a scam, remain vigilant when wanting to participate in IEO and make sure to participate in a place of exchange that has a good and trusted reputation.

Binance conducts monthly voting for the right to list on the exchange. Similar votes are also held on other exchanges. Therefore, if the project is really high-quality and it has an established community, then they have a real chance to get a listing even on such a top exchange as Binance.

Good a thing that the Era of Initial coin offering came and ended, it's after math became what people didn't want to reckon with,scam and all the rest. Now the era of initial exchange Offering came ,it rejuvenated and gave hope again, but now the problem is with some project not being able to pay up for top notch exchanges, well there are still some medium scale exchanges that could help in fund raising,the likes of probit and hoo . I think these are the two I know for now.

You are right Affording big money in start to conduct IEO on big exchanges is not possible for new projects but below are few options as I have observed many new project IEO succeeded on these good reputation exchanges.
1. Hoo.exchange
2. Probit exchange
3. Upbit

I think your list should subtract Probit, because their liquidity is very low, and not reliable to trade. Hoo is a notable new exchange recently when they listed low-cap or mid-cap projects but very potential, and really good liquidity.

This is not really true at all as it basically boils down to who can spend the most to secure the votes needed to win. It’s not a level playing field at all even though it might seem like one.

"Not being able to afford" is literally one of the causes of not being a good project. You do not need to be a rich team to end up rich, if you are a good team, if you have good developers, if you have good designers, if you have a good marketing team, you will end up making a good profit as well, if you fail to do any of that you will not have a lot of money.

That means if you do not have a good team, maybe you should not do a project neither, people act like everyone has a right to start a new project, its not a "must", you guys know that right? If you can't, just don't. Don't start with 100 dollars and zero coding experience and just ask people around and make a fake silly coin. However if you are legit good, you will be capable of actually putting money into it and afford top exchanges.

Any project with good and innovative idea's will be listing on top exchange free of charge. Binance has done this several times with good projects and if any good projects approach their exchange they do accordingly. Also, Hoo exchange list without fee if the said projects seem good or full of potentials, but those projects with speculatives potentials won't be allow in their listing on those exchanges. Moreover, many projects will raised funds  that is up to list on top exchange but won't take the advantage.

It's difficult for all new project to listed on top exchange due to they need their raised fund to develop their project. But if new projects are launched by exchanges like yobit, p2pb2b,, then no doubt those are come to market for scam.

if this new project have good quality , i think listing in binance will not be trouble for them. binance not always talk about fee to list good project, they prefer to filtered by their self and create voting in community voting so project that choosed was supported by large community.

Best thing is if you have a decent project then i think building it and maintaining devs is a top priority once you start gaining strength then go for Binance that will make you gain investors trust in my opinion