Bitcoin Forum

tldr: BC.game should not be trusted platform.


Hi BitcoinTalk members,

First of all, I am an actual newbie here (I don't have main account, nor ever interacted with anyone on this forum prior my BC.game complaint (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5543228.0)) and would like to call people to take action against rather unethical casino operator - BCgame.

Background

Obviously, there is a reason for me opening this thread and forming it the way I will - I was direct victim of their scummy practices: avoiding to pay out winnings, avoiding legal jurisdiction, constant fabrication of data, avoiding to address public complaints directly, but rather gatekeeping it and what not.

So, before you engage with this thread, have in mind that there is personal "vendetta" against BC.game.

Having that in mind, I will be only stating obvious facts and observation of said entity in public (whether it's here, social media or any other source).

Agenda - get their accounts flagged. Simple as that. While I may be minority of people who has been victimized by them, I would like to, at least, inform wider audience to take extra precaution before engaging with said entity.

Avoiding legal jurisdiction and paying out legitimate players' winnings

Between 2023 and 2024, several other players and me have been victimized by BC.game by them refusing to pay out legitimate winnings, and instead ignoring us, thus not giving us any attempt to resolve issues. Being there is no other choice, we've decided to pursue legal ways of claiming our funds.

What happened: short story - lawyer sent out demand letters, and after being ignored he decided that the best strategy would be filing for bankruptcy of their entities (Small House BV and Blockdance BV, case numbers CUR 202403133 and 202403134) so he can use legal means to even give us an opportunity to get our funds, by requiring them to deposit a security ($2.x million) and give them an opportunity to fight these claims in court.

They decided not to fight it legally at all, not securing that deposit and getting declared bankrupt by default.

You can find a decision in most online media (next.io sigma.world etc) in regards to their bankruptcy. More details inside my complaint thread.

Fabrication of data

Interesting fact related to our legal complaint in Curacao was that BC.game constantly fabricated data and evidence publicly.

Mario Galea engaged in conversation with individual named Fabiano about creating new entity so they can avoid legal claims: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zzwXfRBG4is
Shortly after, an announcement has been attached to their website, which directly proves their intentions: https://bc.game/help/announcement (according to archive.org, first time this page occured was in May 14, 2024 - https://web.archive.org/web/20240201000000*/https://bc.game/help/announcement). There was another announcement page which they took shortly after disclaiming their new license from Anjouan.

Some details - https://imgur.com/a/V4tg8UN

Fabrication of evidence: When bankruptcy proceeding was filed, BC.game's lawyer provided following evidence in regards to my account: https://imgur.com/a/Pk7wder

Lets dig deeper into fabrication:
1 - My original account and the account created because of their Google Single Sign on bug were public during 2024. They only became private after BC.game was declared bankrupt. Third account mentioned remains: public for people to view, and is unknown to me, nor I have ever had any other account other than above mentioned.
2 - They claimed they were at loss because they previously processed up to $122k of withdrawals to me. Legitimate ones, same as the conflicting one.
3 - (intentionally?) blurred image as an evidence in court. Yes, we never received any actual visible evidence, nor proof that third account has any relationship with me (like to whom it is registered or is KYC done), even after requesting such for hearing preparation - https://imgur.com/a/IcpudEi

and the final, juicy part. Remember that throughout this whole saga, there were 3 accounts in total mentioned (my actual/used one, KYC verified from day one, the one created due to their technical error and third, conflicting and unknown to me)?

Here goes the twist - Casino guru complaint - https://casino.guru/bc-game-casino-player-s-account-has-been-closed-without-3

and decision made by their representative - https://imgur.com/a/RBgBDQP


so according to them (or evidence provided by BC.game), there are 4 accounts in total conflicting, while in their court defense there were only 3?

At this point, I believe it is obvious that they are actual scammers.

Avoiding to address complaints publicly

So, even though they have representative here on BitcoinTalk, and obviously on Casino.guru as well, it appears that none of their representatives are addressing, nor escalating issues appropriately, even though they are active. Instead, most of victims need to rely on a single person (@holydarkness, thanks for existing for others) in getting their complaints addressed.

Casino.guru is obviously whole another story. I believe this is by far biggest conflict of interest in resolving player's complaints, considering that Casino.guru is affiliate partner of BC.game, so they are biased towards them and or not reviewing any complaints appropriately. Furthermore, BCgame representatives are not even engaging publicly in those complaints at all. So, it's basically hearsay "we saw evidence and we say you abused BC.game platform".

Why would they do that? Simply - plausible deniability and keeping their reputation untarnished. If they engage publicly in complaint, they are aware that one exist and have to resolve it, otherwise their reputation is going down the sink. You can pretty much see that all complaints here on Bitcointalk are addressed by @holydarkness only, and many of them are even closed, because his contact said so (or fabricated evidence, as proven above).

In this instance, the only person that gets undeserved hate is holydarkness himself. While trying to help others by using his contacts, most of the time "resolution" is based on what two parties have to say. And I believe I certainly proved that the main party (BC.game) is giving him false data.

Example: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5527118.60

I know there is a possibility that this player's claim might be fraudulent one, considering he is a newbie, as am I. But doesn't it seem little strange that there are number of similarities in such cases that "newbies" are thrown down the bus even though most of them are probably just actual Newbies here and have more integrity than BCgame themselves?

Now, here's another example - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5504423.0

OP's update:

or something even more intriguing:


so, in reality this was their strategy all along at the same time my account was closed?

Take an action

I would ask everyone to go thoroughly through this thread, my complaint and all complaints against BC.game on BitcoinTalk and objectively "Support" or "Oppose" flag that I've placed for both @BC.GAME and @BC.Game Support, thus informing wide audience on who are BC.game in fact.

Flags: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3403 and https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3404

Creating two threads for the same issue will get you as far as creating two flags for the same issue has gotten you, nowhere. This thread is not exactly the same as the other one so you are not breaking the rule about duplicated threads but I suggest you lock this one and continue the conversation on the other one. I will reply you there.

Thanks for the feedback.

Flag related: I don't know how to create one flag to be honest (tried looking for and couldn't find).
Thread related: In regards to my initial thread, it is complaint against BC.game. This one I've created simply for people to investigate BC.game actions regardless of my complaint (platform-wide).

Basically, when I opened initial complaint thread, my intentions were to focus solely on my complaint, but during the thread, I've basically went to collect more evidence on their behavior platform-wide.

Note for the flag for those who [with just mind] are considering to support or oppose? Do all of you mind to wait a little? I'm already in this case and is still waiting for my contact. The complexity of the case require me to reach that contact as they have a cat-like fluidity to maneuver interdepartment, and I'm not sure if this is related to legal, compliance, risk, promotion, or whatever else division they have and related to this one and/or handling the situation.

Thus, I reach them. But they're kinda hard to chase and get a time with. I'm trying to urge the other contacts I have to reach that contact too and to spare some time with me.

Until I can have a sit with them and have a better understanding of the matter from their side, I'll appreciate if DT would refrain from taking any action. My gut feeling said there are more to this situation than what our eyes meet.

Happy to wait, but I don't think they'll ever engage in any discussion transparently, as proven.

I'm waiting for a year already so all I have is time :)

The Casino Guru representative claims that he has seen enough supporting evidence that you referred yourself from the same device that you used for multiple accounts. You are denying that you did. Obviously, no one hear can know if you are telling the truth or not.

Back when the second account was mistakenly created, you said you reported this to BC.Game support and never used the account again. Do you have proof of that correspondence and did they confirm closing/blocking that account?   

Casino.guru also claims that there are in total 4 accounts they've seen based on the evidence from BC.game.

On the other hand, last year in court, there were only 3 accounts in total conflicted. Where does the fourth coming from all of sudden?

As for the double account, I've became aware of this just about a month before initial court hearing, after lawyer and his technical guy informed me about it, which was months after my account became blocked. At that point I've found out about that second account, and the reason for its existence. So they've been informed via demand letter (seen by @holydarkness).

So to summarize, I never even knew about that second account at all prior or during my ban. Third account which they claim is mine I never even heard of, let alone own it.

After multiple attempts to get any information on that (3rd) account, they ignored me and my lawyers, and never even provide any evidence of that account information (registered date, deposit TXs, KYC if there is any etc). Please note that I would be happy to throw the towel for just one proof that I did anything wrong or even admit it, but I never did. I've been playing on various casinos throwing even more money than on BC.game and none of those never questioned my integrity.

And now, 4th account was never mentioned in 2024 anywhere (not to me, not to court and certainly not to my lawyer), but only Casino Guru seen it? I'd rather have explanation on that.

Here's one of the transactions I did to BC.game account - https://polygonscan.com/tx/0xefe7cb00882c2d8cd58f946f2f99d39496712e11fe8914eb4fa684fa6a000546

So the only other scenario that could happen here at all is them flagging my account for double because of source of funds being OKX hot wallet, which appears to be scenario happening a lot nowadays.

edit: Let me link all three accounts they've mentioned in their defense, so you can see how ridiculous this is.

1st account - Mine - https://bc.game/user/profile/35865086 (it was public, but they hid it after bankruptcy)
2nd account - Mine created due to their technical error explained in initial post - https://bc.game/user/profile/35733412 (they hid this one as well). Please note that there was $0 usage of this account: no deposits, no withdrawals and certainly not any bonus abuses, as I never claimed single bonus from them.
3rd account - NOT mine - https://bc.game/user/profile/37958301 - This one I don't even know who owns it. After several attempts, they never gave any information that relates to me.
4th account - I don't even know there was fourth one.

On top of all that, why would I risk creating third account and "self refer" with public wager seeming to be $1.5k, just to risk $1.5m?

EDIT #2: Actually, I reported it to them on July, but didn't know how to explain the actual bug: https://imgur.com/a/NmkBWJG

I will be creating a flag after I have posted my next thread about bc.game. I will include this case in the thread though I can't support this right away as there is the he said she said about the multiple accounts. Otherwise, it seems like a very valid and shocking (to some) case (that they declared bankruptcy to avoid paying settlements/court). There have been many threads posted against them now and what is abundantly clear is that they are closing/locking accounts and only resolving issues for those who have the capacity to come and post on bitcointalk/pursue on review services.

Branislav the Casino Guru representative says that the casino showed him evidence of at least two other linked accounts. So, according to them, there could be four, five, or more... But like I said, this is not something anyone here can verify as true or false. Taking sides based on that information alone would be subjective.

Another thing caught my eye. Who wrote this email (https://imgur.com/a/NmkBWJG) back in July 2024? If it was you, then who is writing these posts? The posts in this thread and that email aren't written by the same person.

So, I'm not the only one.

They did not declared bankruptcy, court did, but they "surrendered" license (even though they knew it's going to be revoked by GCB) and moved to Anjouan, leaving others like me stranded.


In regards to CG, I've also asked them to see the evidence, as that's something I could possibly use in legal matter in Belize, which I plan to do if there is no resolution in the next month or so. And that's the whole point:

Their defense in bankruptcy hearing against me was that there were three accounts in total (you can find part of it in the first post of this thread), and CG claims there are 4. So either they never received anything from BC.game (considering their reps never responded there) or they are just defending them to keep their "Safety index score" high, considering they are direct affiliates of BC.game (check the link on BC.Game casino guru page). Either way, something's fishy going on.

As for the "sudden" increase of english writing skills, I can assure you (and BC.game as well) that it's same person :) I've been traveling around the world for the last year with my friend and trying to learn other skills, and of course using a bit of tools to sound more proficient. As I said in my complaint post, CG also claimed that there is reason to believe it's not the same person, so I welcome both of them to hop on a call and verify my identity by checking the passport sent in KYC.

edit: just to clarify, when I was using my account, I wasn't traveling anywhere, so this could not possibly be the reason for account block :)

This is what Casino Guru (https://casinoguru-en.com/bc-game-casino-player-s-account-has-been-closed-without-3) state on their website: 

The player from Indonesia reported that his account at BC.Game had been locked without justification, and he was unable to access his $1.6M balance. Despite winning a legal case in Curaçao against the casino, they refused to pay him and falsely accused him of using "prohibited techniques." The Complaints Team closed the complaint as unjustified, citing violations of the casino's Terms and Conditions, including multiple accounts and self-referral, which were supported by evidence. The team noted that the issues raised fell outside their scope for review and recommended that the player consult the gambling authority for further action.

This is probably the largest non-payment case I have read about in the forum and it is BC Game that is involved again. If the OP won his case in Curaçao (where BC Game was based at the time) they should have allowed him to withdraw the funds.

Was this the case that BC Game lost and were declared bankrupt (and forced them to quit Curaçao in November 2024)?

It was.

It's not the largest (there was $7m guy last year), but so far it is the largest they're doing everything in their power not to pay because, others included in this bankruptcy case and I made a mess with their Curacao license and just don't want to deal with us anymore at all.

p.s. just to show you how far I'm fighting for the money legitimately won, I've involved UK Gambling Commission in this, to which they forced Stake and BC.game out of UK: https://casinobeats.com/2024/12/02/bc-game-ends-uk-operation-as-speculation-elevates/

I have no motivation to stop, unless I get what's legitimately owed to me. I have plans to take them out (legally) off of Cyprus (Fenice Tech), Belize (Twocent Technology) and US, unless I get my winnings paid.

and just couple days ago, TGP Europe (daddy's firm) did similar to what BC did in Curacao - https://sigma.world/news/gambling-commission-forces-tgp-europe-out-of-gb-market/

No, you're not. There have been tens, maybe hundreds of cases against bc.game. A lot of them are newbies who had never joined the forum, and had created a thread which was resolved by their PR representative. BC.game resolve any thread posted here as resolving scam accusations make it look like they're legitimate, when the reality is that they only help those who speak up on the forum, while many others who aren't aware of the forum, can't complete kyc, have language barriers and so on, can't speak up.

Though look around. BC.game sponsor just about every member on this forum, whether it be through signature campaign advertisements or sponsored threads...it is clear that they're recycling the wealth they're accumulating from both their casino business and from scamming into advertising on and off of the forum. So, it's very difficult to have a real and objective discussion about them and their practices without the mouths that feed them to, for example, leave a negative trust on your profile calling you a charlatan (which is what has happened to me).

And if you just look at most recent cases against BC.game here on forum and in Casino Guru, their representatives don't engage at all, and most of complaints end up "resolved" based on the words said by BC.game to CG or third party trying to mediate (holydarkness), so at the end newbies like me don't stand a chance of getting resolution, because their "representative" is word from God.

Why would (for example) Casino guru care about player while they're raking affiliate money from BC game? It is in their interest to keep BCG's trust high enough for people to sign up. Although AskGamblers is BCG affiliate as well, it seems they're trying to do a bit more in regards to transparency. rating them 2.3, but I'm afraid that majority of complaints end up in trash bin because at the end of the day, BC game is trusted platform and players are "guilty until proven otherwise" by default. None of those platforms even question their shady tactics, because players like me mostly end up accepting the fact they were scammed and do nothing to inform others. After all, it's our words against "reputable" platform.

I don't blame other victims, but on the other hand I personally won't stop fighting for what's rightfully mine, even if it includes decade-long fight. And I won't stop until I receive what's rightfully mine. My legal actions forced them out of Curacao and United Kingdom, and this is just a start. I can safely say that United States is going to be their next, and by far the biggest doom, as they thought that they can get away with advertising in US market but blocking US traffic is enough. And of course, Belize and Cyprus will be next two court proceedings against them. Anjouan licensing might lack of regulations, but that license has been assigned to entity outside of Anjouan, and I'm coming for it.

Sorry for way too much off-topic, anger in me just raises to the surface whenever I see scammers, and by far BCG is one of the biggest out there...

There’s a high chance that it’s related since casino usually don’t change their license without any major issue.

However, Anjouan license is starting to get popularity from casino due to their casino friendly requirements.

---

Their declaration of bankruptcy just to dodge this user payout while still using the same brand with different license is big red flag once proven. I’m waiting for @holydarkness summary to avoid premature judgement since this user has a record of potential ToS abuse from CG.

Sorry for being silence for couple of days in regards to this case, be it on this thread or on its sister board. I... do my own DD in the abasence of my contact's response and what I found, I'm not sure how to word my findings. I probably will come with something to say later tonight, after I tackled my IRL matters and have more time at hand.

For the time being though, OP, if you can help me understand better, because I am not sure I get it right:


Were you saying that you're involved in a court action or something about this? Because the article is simply about BC UK, no mention of you there. And... if I am not wrong, they're still with Leichester or whichever team on EPL, no?

And while we're at it, might as well divulge more on your involvement in this situation and or how the article related to your matter? I scanned the article and it barely mention BC. Or you.

Before we proceed further, please note that this thread is not intended for my own case, but rather deep dive into BC.game outside of my case, so please don't mix it up. Thread in scam accusations is related to my case, this one is broad overview of BC.game.


Now, to go into further details of what I was claiming in relation to BC.game and connection within UKGC decision, quotes from Casinobeats:


And to further explain my involvement in them losing UK operations, through my contact who helped me escalate this case legally, I've managed to get in touch with UK Gambling Commission and sat down with them in their Birmingham's office. On that meeting, we've went through all of the documents collected by us (me, other players and our legal rep in Curacao) and informed them directly on what's going on on that platform, including money laundering (ref: https://intel.arkm.com//dashboards/view?dashboardID=2a4ab5c6-0d6c-402a-8f5a-ead2daedc963 & https://x.com/lilbagscientist/status/1846912893784076798) to which they did their own due diligence and have taken actions based upon all information we provided plus additional one that directly relates to their UK market operations.

In regards to TGP Europe -> BC.game, BC.game and Stake were using TGP's UK sublicense to operate in UK (entity Medium Rare N.V. / TGP Europe Ltd, look it up in Companies House). There are additional information in relation to this, but I am not allowed to disclose due NDA. What I can though is that TGP Europe lost their license following detailed UKGC investigation POST BCG/Stake exit from the UK.

Everyone who registers at bc.game has the option of an affiliate program. You just generate a link and become an affiliate partner. Maybe casino.guru has somewhat better conditions, because they still have more influence, but that does not necessarily mean that it is a conspiracy theory and organized cheating of gamblers.

In this case, OP was paid and successfully withdrew all $7 million. If there is any doubt that it is a planned action, then why would the OP delete all the information and not leave it as some kind of advertisement for a casino?
btw. He rewarded 7 forum members with $7k who participated in resolving this case.

Conspiracy theory would be baseless accusations, now lets look at how they perform complaints. In somewhat normal complaint "procedure" (considering they're not legal entity and has zero legal merits in mediating any case) both parties should be able to present supporting/opposing evidence of what one claims to be. In Casino.guru complaints for most of big platforms (Stake, BC game) you can see that recently, there is very little or none casino engagement directly, but most of the cases are resolved based on the evidence that mediator seen.

Please tell me it's not questionable at best, alarming at the worst for players who filed complaints not to be able to see what's presented against them, so they can either face the facts or defend themselves properly (depending on the case)?

In regards to $7m case, I don't imply that it was planned action against that player, but it's became a "strategy" of BC.game simply to ban accounts under false accusations "Breach of ToS" and simply ignore the players, until such cases reach to the public eyes? There are numerous of such cases on smaller amount being taken and never resolved simply because players were either newbies on this forum and have zero trust or lack of deeper understanding of their case, yet all of such cases are KYC related, and most of those are even "double account" claims?

I am not asking you to trust me based off of my words, but based on the facts. If they were so damn sure that I was breaking their Terms of Service, how come they never deposited funds in Curacao bank of theirs, provided banknote guarantee to court and defend their claims legally? That way, if they were so damn sure in their case against me and other players, they would've won cases in court, got their legal fees reimbursed and kept their reputation in green. Instead, they never provided that note, responded to most of the claims with "hearsay" (no actual evidence provided saying they were right) and were declared bankrupt.

Or even better, why would've they risk of going bankrupt in first place if they were certain that all players that filed for their bankruptcy were abusers?

Tell me if you were running such a reputable business, would you risk of getting such verdict, and risk future of your reputation if you know you're right? Didn't think so.


Furthermore, if we look at legal case + CG case specifically, I've already shown you proof that either BCgame fabricated evidence to Casinoguru in regards to my case or Casino Guru just defends BCgame because of not doing so (aka marking them as not safe) would've impose risk to their income stream from them as an affiliates.



So let us ask simple question: How many users were banned for "multiple account" reason just because they were incompetent enough and created scenario where any user would be able to do so unknowingly and unwillingly?

If you are the reason BC Game were expelled from the UK market and if you manage to get them expelled from Cyprus, Belize and the US it will certainly hit them hard financially. They must be regretting the day they did not settle with you.

From their perspective, BC Game did state they were against the bankruptcy ruling and disputed it but it cannot alter the fact they obtained a licence from Anjouan after losing their Curacao licence under the circumstances you described.

As for the $7 million winner, it was resolved in the end but your case was not. Your case has to be the largest that I am aware of remains unresolved.

Noted, then I shall pull myself a full brake on this and address my findings on that thread, as it is where we shall address your matter. And perhaps, after we cleared that matter, I'll hop back into this one and address the matter globally as you intended this thread for. Or perhaps, I don't need to. From where I stand right now, it all depends on the outcome of that thread when we get to the bottom of your case. Nonetheless, I'll sit back and eat popcorn while reading discussions and speculations on this thread.

The matter of me being successful like I was previously is the only obstacle in getting that resolution in other markets. I know for the fact that USDA of Miami-Dade County is pursuing investigation into their US-targeted advertising efforts and will (soon?) release public statement in regards to them. For the Belize and Cyprus, that's going to be legal battle (same/similar to Curacao one), so lets see if we're going to be successful.

I'm not much of an optimistic person in regards to my case, but nonetheless I have no intention to stop in regards to exposing BCgame for what they really are - scammers and liars.


Appreciate the understanding. As far as you giving your opinions, please do so, regardless of my case. After all, you should be able to give us some insights as well (provided that you want) on how things are going in regards to your contacts.

offtopic: thank you for even taking time to read my complaint and even trying to address it to your contacts. Regardless of the outcome, I don't have negative feedback as I understand how tricky it can be. Cheers

I'm of them being favored. They'd have a lot of resources to protect their image with platforms and people. There's not a lot of hope in their operation genuinely being exposed and scrutinized as anything that makes it to the public surface mostly gets resolved.

I made a small amount of effort to test the water as to whether the community cared about this parasite entity. The community doesn't. They care more about getting paid. When the discussion arises about the clearly corrupt way of operating it is countered unreasonably to the point where third party readers are scared to reply (and in worse cases like mine, left negative trust and called a charlatan), or end up being ignored.

While you shouldn't stop to fight for what is yours, don't let it take away from your life, and remember that corruption in the world runs much deeper than bc.game. While they are a large point of corruption in general, it goes further (who provides their license, who lets them keep it, why the gambling regulator doesn't take a lot of action, are all valid questions about corruption that is bigger than bc.game).

It has become very difficult to defend the behaviour of BC Game.

Clearly with hindsight, had BC Game known matters would deteriorate to this extent they would have saved themselves the hassle and would have settled with you when the issue arose.

I can understand their perspective as there is a reluctance to settle with you because they are claiming they are 100% innocent of the bankruptcy ruling and to save face cannot settle with you even though they probably know you will challenge them in other jurisdictions and they will suffer immensely when rulings are made against them.

Unfortunately for BC Game, they have suffered the consequences of challenging a determined and confident individual such as yourself and now they are paying the price with their reputation damaged beyond repair.

Understandably, if they were 100% sure they were innocent, they should've taken legal path to fighting claims in court, which would've cost them nothing, other than depositing amount of claims (which was $2.X m as I was not the only claimant, but the only one publicly talking) and providing banknote guarantee that they're solvent and could settle in case they lose in court. They didn't, and instead went to blame outdated laws of Curacao for them being declared bankrupt and just evading actual laws from the country they held their business with.

And you are on point - settling with me or any other player (except one, which from day 1 they settled, lowest amount in case) would mean that they've made mistake, but unfortunately that's going to cost them 10x more. I have no intention of backing off, legally and publicly. It appears that Bloomberg is also investigating Curacao gambling and thanks to SBGOK, our story will (probably) be published there as well.


Unfortunately, my life and this case is somewhat related, so backing off is not an option right now. As for the second part, you're right. And although my target is getting my legitimate winnings, I'm also being contacted through SBGOK (which is non-profit helping players) from various regulatory bodies to explain my case, and people helping my case giving them deeper insights on how these predators operate. There are some success stories, some failures, but mostly it ends up countries closing doors for Curacao, and pretty soon Anjouan licensing.

For example, BCgame claimed that they were never aware of $5m fines in Spain or 400k e (or similar) in Netherlands, while both regulators shown clear proofs that they have tried to get in touch with BCgame to stop serving those markets and notified them about the fines imposed. Some of this is public, some is based on the testimony from BCgame bankruptcy hearing, but all in all, it proves a point.

People might not like me for coming out to speak for myself and many others who decided to give up, or even discredit me with my awful history, but so far all the facts provided and some of speculations point to the same direction - BCgame is not the entity to have faith in, no matter who's advertising them.

I am glad to see you are active in this thread. You did not create it and then abandon it, you are a full participant posting regularly. I hope that continues because you will be in a position to provide updates as soon as matters develop.

As for BC Game blaming outdated laws for their bankruptcy, they should have settled the matter before it go to the judgement stage and now they are facing the consequences of their conduct. If you were not the only claimant, how many were there in total?

4 players in total: Turkey, Costa Rica, Netherlands and (me)Indonesia.

amounts in total somewhere around $2.2m (never counted tbh)

That raises the question about what on earth were BC Game doing by not paying out and then having to face a group action in court against them. That sort of conduct seems to be mismanagement by their team on an epic scale.

Actually, if I am reading everything correctly, BCgame might just provided fabricated evidence to holydarkness (this is only my speculation based on his wording after meeting with his contact).

More articles on BC.game:

https://fintelegram.com/unmasking-the-iga-group-the-maltese-power-brokers-behind-the-global-bc-game-and-rabidi-gambling-scandals/
https://fintelegram.com/%f0%9f%94%b4exposed-leicester-citys-silent-partnership-with-bc-games-offshore-crime-syndicate-whos-bankrolling-the-foxes%f0%9f%94%b4/
https://next.io/news/regulation/white-label-giant-premier-league-sponsors-exits-gb/

This just goes to show that institutions mean little to nothing. Capitalism has created a landscape online and with real life extensions where everything can be bought with money. Curacao will sell you a casino license for online operations that even they don't accept for their own citizens. And yet Curacao is a sovereign entity and not just a fabricated island.

When Curacao fails to deliver what the rich entities want from them, they just avoid any enforcement and jump to the next license.

This can even happen in more "serious" countries. When the enforcement in Curacao is reaching levels of ridiculousness that become funny, other countries just allow corruption at a high degree. For example, as most casinos have their legal address in Cyprus, search "Cyprus Papers" and you'll see why. It even happens in the "good" EU countries.

I know you stated it was your speculation, do you have any update with regards to this? If they have done something that calls the name of their business into disrepute it should be highlighted and should be discussed too.

Still just a speculation.

holy stated in one of his posts that it appears that what he seen from his contact was geniune/matching info. Still waiting for something concrete.

[I'm stepping off from my spectator chair and jump in, as my statement is kinda... needed here, I guess?]

Should be genuine.

I tried to pull some kind of double-blind-study (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5543228.msg65414647#msg65414647) [for a lack of better terms] where both BC and OP didn't know what I'm looking for. BC provided me with evidences that I later asked OP to retrace from his own side, and the narrative that OP told matched the evidence BC gave. They both shouldn't know what I'm looking for or why I'm asking specific things, and as both side give a matching chronology, I think it's safe to assume that the evidence BC gave to me is the same that BC gave to CG, and they're not tampered in a sense that they manipulate the elements to be in their favor.

This speaks very much of a broken trust but then, I would say you shouldn’t have the impression that by some means, they would treat you in the same way they would treat someone they’ve always engaged with in solving some of these issues. It’s true you are a customer and deserves a far better treatment in handling complaints but, the case is a little different as the complainant and when they feel they’ve said just enough to have you reconsider your stands and accept guilt.
That’s where forum users come in to push for a more clear version of what could really be at play and how to make obvious every fact to the letter. Have a little faith in the process you’ve begun to lead to a resolution rather than just having to flag.

It’s a little sketchy though to say an evidence provided is manipulated, how do they verify such I wonder!

Although this has little to do with my case, but much more broader view of BCG actions, I'd be happy to engage in this conversation:

Reason why I have little faith in the process is because before coming here I've: tried reaching them out directly initially to get the issue resolved, only to get same old response (You've breached this that and that ToS) with zero evidence, let alone any due diligence done. After that, I tried to use social media to get their attention and actually do something in my case, only to receive same responses. Went legal pathway, got a claim validation by their bankruptcy trustee, only not to be able to get the money, as they have already fled the Curacao and went for another license.

I do believe that there's more information being shared now than in any of my previous attempts to get anything, but the problem with all of that, I am seeing zero information that are actually tangible to my case.

I did absolutely NOTHING to intentionally break their Terms or put my account and winnings into risk of being taken away, but I cannot get resolution because whenever I think I'm close to getting it, they bail out.

Placing accusation here is the last resort before moving further with my legal case: pursuing further in Curacao while simultaneously filing lawsuits in Belize, Cyprus and Comoros, if no resolution is given to me.

And please, tell me, do you believe that having to fight for your money in 4 different countries is normal? Lets look at Stake or Gamdom for example: both of them continue to operate in Curacao, and as far as I know, they either fight the claims in court, or they reach out to the lawyer (who was also representing me) to settle.

If BC.game were sure I did something to "abuse" their system, why didn't they fight back in court? Or why haven't they provided any evidence to me that I did something like that INTENTIONALLY? I already pointed out in my Accusation thread several times, if at any time I was given any evidence proving that I did something intentionally, I would've happily thrown the towel and accept their decision. But that never happened. And looking at other old threads from 2024, it appears that this was their behavior by default back then, at the same time I was having issues.

I started playing online casinos at the 2023/24 and so far I have accounts on most of them with successful history and zero issues. Only BC.game, out all of them, is having problem with me. Is that because I won close to $1.5m? Or is it because I actually broke their Terms, but not willingly and only because there was and still is an issue with their sign-in platform? I really don't know. But I'm not stopping in my fight unless I get winnings I legitimately acquired.

If it is safe to assume the evidence BC Game provided you was the same as they sent to CasinoGuru and in all probability they have not been tampered with, what are your opinions on the matter raised in the OP? If you cannot answer right now because you might be in conversation with BC Game it is understandable but sooner or later the OP will hopefully want closure.

My opinion on this topic? I can't say yet, as this thread is designed by OP to address the matters surrounding BC globally. I am yet to touch any aspect pointed in this thread as I'm currently chasing OP's other thread that focused on and limited to his own case with BC. I think I'm very close with the bottom of that thread, just waiting for some posts and reply from both sides as I'm currently doing another double-blind test on them.

I'll move to this thread once I managed to deliver my final findings on the other thread.

You can't say because you are doing their public relations for them.

The unbiased opinion that bc.game is a fraudulent casino that is using sophisticated legal tactics to scam unsuspecting players and to escape any legal prosecution, and are taking advantage of players who do not create a scam accusation thread in this forum, is growing. BC.game's time is limited.

I tried to tell you that you are wrapped up in helping a fraudulent casino and yet you continue to be a "free" PR rep for them. Though, I still maintain my opinion that you receive some for of favoring or compensation for work, considering you refuse to explicitly deny that you benefit in any way whatsoever for acting on their behalf as a PR rep. I can't possibly believe that someone who is dealing with so many cases for free (apparently) doesn't stop and think "Oh gee, I what about all the people who aren't making threads about their accounts being frozen?" or "Am I protecting the reputation of criminals/scammers?". Have you ever stopped and thought that, and if so, what were your thoughts and actions after that?

I think the vast majority that have an interest in these threads would probably disagree with your comments about the public relations. In the end, if a member does not agree with a point of view does not necessarily mean they are corrupt. I think these types of allegations do not help the situation especially when someone is claiming they were a victim of a scam.

I'm giving my best to ignore you as you derail cases, but... are we doing this dance again?

I've made my statement (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5533262.msg65157142#msg65157142), it's quite clear and enough for people who simply looking for confirmation instead of throwing muds. Since that statement is not satisfying enough for you (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5533262.msg65163403#msg65163403), it infers that you're... but hey, my offer still stands (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5533262.msg65182542#msg65182542), I'll copy-paste exactly what you want me to say, just put your money where your mouth is... or rather your fingers.

Can't help but notice that this thread must be a goldmine to you, though. If I can help the player, you'll gleefully said, "Look, BC paid because they're cornered. If OP never create his thread, BC will run with his money." If I can't get OP to get his fund though, it'll be "See? holydarkness is covering for BC". Such a win-win scenario for someone with dysfunctional spine.

But hey, here's a little wake up call: by saying that casinos are selectively scamming their player with methods you proposed: where they'll steal from people who didn't raise complaints in this forum, you do aware that the scenario also applied to literally every casino on this forum, right? Including the one which signature you're wearing, and pay you?

Were you also accusing me of getting incentive from BetFury for [I believe the word you use here is:] "bridging" between the player and them? Are they also selectively scamming their player and collecting wealth from those who can't sound their protest here? Yet you're still happily wear their sig and receive payments?

Or were they an exception from your understanding of how casinos steal from their players simply because you're wearing their sig?

What ethic is that? Ohh right, you have an entire (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5471733.0), no wait, two entire (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5471791.0)... umm three (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5115291.msg63017210#msg63017210), discussion with 1miau.

Hhhhh... this is a case of naivette at best and hypocrisy at worst. But yep... put your money where your mouth and fingers are, next time you mention my name and accuse me with those things, it better come with that deal I offer you. Otherwise just shushh, you're just further embarrassing yourself by showing how severe the dysfuctionality of your back is. My two cents though.

---

OP, sorry, just venting up to my annoyance of one specific bug that keep circling me. You, above all, certainly knows how many pages I read and the length I take to get your case done, and now imagine those effort meet with such post like quoted, just because the person is so morally and ethically challenged that he can't believe people are doing things out of good will. Wait... let's trace it further... the comment was initially birthed because he had a dislike with a CM of BC, I believe, and I'm a collateral victim here that he dragged into the mud just to further his agenda. This post has nothing to do with you, don't mind it.

Coming back on-topic, just found out that "false statements" are not so uncommon with BC.game.

Apparently, somewhere in 2019, they've stated they had MGA (Malta Gaming Authority) license. On the other hand, MGA says following:

https://www.mga.org.mt/player-hub/unauthorised-urls/


https://talkimg.com/images/2025/05/30/UXtyzW.png

MGA has officially announced that it has no connection with bcgame, as bcgame had previously announced. I found this page on their official website:


I also looked for where bcgame might have made this claim and found nothing, including no discussion on any forums or mention of it on any news sites.

I don't think bcgame can be held accountable for this, given that the statement is outdated and dates back to 2019. Even if it did, bcgame could be considered to have overlooked the error and officially sought a license from Curacao.

After properly inquiring, this list includes all sites that (at some point) claimed to be MGA licensed, while they were not. Can they be held accountable? No. Does this further cement my claims of them issuing false statements and/or fabrication of some sort? Hell yeah :)

I've asked AI: "I want to play on BC.game. Should I trust it?" (please note although I highly believe that AI are giving you reasonable doubt, they can still throw "delusional" answers):

https://talkimg.com/images/2025/06/01/UXkzyJ.png
https://talkimg.com/images/2025/06/01/UXkFbC.png
https://talkimg.com/images/2025/06/01/UXkEHb.png
https://talkimg.com/images/2025/06/01/UXkIsv.png

Company Twocent Technology Limited doesn't exist in Belize registry?

https://talkimg.com/images/2025/06/03/UXoSxw.png

Here is the trust rating that bc.game left on holydarkness' profile before it was removed:
https://i.postimg.cc/W4zBRmFr/hdpr.png

Making invaluable contributions to the brand's reputation through handling their disputes for them, is handling their public relations for them, wouldn't you agree? This is the perspective of bc.game themselves.


It's already clear to many that bc.game only resolve cases that are posted on this forum to both protect their reputation here and likely because when "bc.game scam" is searched, only resolved cases are shown (creating the guise that bc.game is legitimate). It's already clear that you handle PR for them and other casinos, most likely for a reward from somewhere (direct or indirect) and that it isn't done for free (despite the word magic you continue to use around the topic).

You can keep dragging me into the conversation and wasting your time with your words, call me dysfunctional, write word walls to try and tarnish what my words mean, and so on, though it means very little to me. The truth is (no matter what you say about or to me) is that you are a part of keeping the bc.game scam machine alive, as well as other casinos here.


It should be noted too that (depending on if you are using chatgpt for free or not) it's knowledge may not be up to the current date.

Online casinos do not overlook licencing authorities where their casinos are supposed to be registered. If BC Game made that claim it could not have been by accident. Their reputation is becoming a problem but they only have themselves to blame.

Just because they have an opinion of one member it does not mean the sentiments are mutual. What is the difference if BC Game left a tag for you stating the exact words: "A wonderful user who has made an invaluable contribution to our brands reputation" and then members used that feedback to attack you? It is a one-sided feedback.

By me keeping the scam machine alive, BC as well as there casinos... you're referring to the casinos on this forum? Including the casinos which signature you're currently wearing?

As for "word magic", you can get exactly what you ask for, the exact statement word-for-word letter-for-letter character-for-character, an exact copy paste of,

All you need is to agree for my terms,


But... wait. Of course you can't agree to it, because when you do, you'll be the first one paying me, as you're the one that actively throwing that jabs with negative connotation at me. So the only option will be that you'll lose something to smear me certain color, of which... is your main agenda here, or you'll lose significant fund by time. Certainly that's the only reason why you can't agree to the terms, right? Because... I'm more than ready to swore that oath above. Just waiting for your move.

We're beyond the point of you needing to say that you have no form of incentive for doing what you do. No one would go to the lengths that you go to work for bc.game and other casinos with absolutely no incentive at all. At a minimum, you use the job to fill your campaign quota and to build your reputation as some sort of good samaritan that "helps players" with casino disputes. That's the minimum. I personally believe you are incentivized more than that, as I can't believe that a person could be so negligent of the obvious selective scamming operation that bc.game is conducting.

You can keep on saying I owe you 25k and all that garbage though it doesn't take away from the fact of what you are doing.

Also what "agenda" could I possibly have? What benefit do I get from calling out the problems that your "god's work" is causing? A negative trust rating from icopress is the only reward I've gotten so far. I get no benefit for highlighting your misdeeds. The real agenda is the selective casino scamming. I have no agenda other than pointing out it exists.


Well, the difference would be through my posts and actions. I am not using that feedback to attack hd, I am simply stating that he is acting as their public relations person (which, he is, as he is handling basically all of their scam accusation threads for them in the exact same way as if he were to be employed by them to do so).

Nobody needs to bother explaining anything to BenCodie. They are pretty clearly a troll who gets off making unfounded accusations against well established users. And as a well established user, you owe nothing to him. Nobody will ever take his threats or games of "gotcha" seriously, so there's no point in attempting to satisfy his ridiculous demands.

You are clearly getting off on using your reputation to try and label me as a troll. I am not the only one who is looking at holydarkness and wondering why he is not questioning the fact that bc.game are having so many scam accusations against them and also wondering about anyone who is not making a scam accusation thread, and how much has been permanently locked and never resolved with bc.game.

The fact that you are not acknowledging that and additionally pinning me as a troll is neglect for a very legitimate concern with that casino, shows that you are more concerned with invalidating any of what I have to say over the safety of other community members than stopping the obvious problem that is selective scamming by casinos (where bc.game is clearly one of the clear main culprits).

Both you and holydarkness had opportunities to just make a simple statement that you have no involvement in activities that relate to corruption within the community, you both refused repeatedly and now, try to pin me as a troll because I put you both on the spot. As I've said plenty of times, you can continue to call what I say unfounded, it means nothing to me nor should it mean anything to anyone. Just because you are a trusted member and have had their integrity questioned by me, does not mean that you are right in trying to have me known as a troll (which is 100% untrue, my motivation from day one is to fight for what is right, you are obviously not on that page otherwise you'd be looking outside of your tunnel vision that defends other "trusted" members).

Their .US "social casino" portion is suspended. Why? I guess there are legal questions, according to EPP code status.

https://talkimg.com/images/2025/06/05/UXbkqf.png
https://talkimg.com/images/2025/06/05/UXb3LD.png

---

RugCheck marking their token

https://talkimg.com/images/2025/06/05/UXpSVZ.png

The image being portrayed is definitely as though you are attacking him (even if the intention is the opposite).

As for him working as a public relations person for BC Game, it is not true. BC Game is not the only casino that has scam accusations against them and holydarkness has been active in many scam accusation threads about different casinos too. He volunteers a lot of his time trying to resolve cases, at least that should be acknowledged rather than his reputation being called in to question.

Interesting facts:

---

This is my opinion on holydarkness, and that's based on his previous work as well as work on my case in [Scam Accusation] forum:

He took most underappreciated position in this forum. Period.

I completely understand what he put himself into by "mediating" between two parties and I very much appreciate what he's been doing in my case and many others. Already stated couple of times once my case is solved, I will be compensating him properly.

Now, lets go into his "title" as a mediator: Unfortunately, taking this responsibility, he's been put into difficult position to substantiate operators' accusations against players. Issue with his position bears responsibility of not being able to disclose evidence, and that's somewhat understandable - privacy reasons.

The problem with all of that comes when both parties claims innocence and yet both parties have strong arguments against each other (like in mine case specifically). So on one hand, he is supposed to lean to the players' side, who he (in most cases) just "met" (and in my case, has very fishy history) or, on the other side, to the operator who has established "reputation" (so to say) and believe what he is seeing is accurate information. If I was in his place, I would probably mostly do the same thing (lean towards the operators) in most cases.

There are times at which @holydarkness slightly takes casinos' side too soon, but that only presents the problem to the people who actually has something to hide. From my side, even though he had seen evidence proving otherwise, and his findings are against me, at the end of it, there was no ill intention. He did his job decently (imho), I respected it even though it's not the outcome I'd wanted, but at the end I had low hopes on it from a very beginning. Not because of him, but because I am aware of what BCgame is doing.

Something I never brought on my case is following page: https://bc.game/help/blockdance. If you go through page, it is agreement "valid for players who signed up before April 30 2024", which includes me. When did this page went live? September 14, weeks before first bankruptcy hearing.

Their defense in my case? I was registered before April 30th and Blockdance BV (which is just another shell company) was liable for my winnings. Even though all liabilities said company had up to that date were settled and my $1.5m winnings occured between May and June. Thankfully, they were stupid enough to provide sales agreement to which liability now goes directly to the Cypriot company.

But that's whole other story of me proving their evidence fabrication.

I will make my stance a clearer - I find it very hard to believe that a casino can do so much wrongdoing and that the one user on this forum is preventing that casino from being labelled as a scam, because they are essentially handling their cases for them. It is hard to believe that this user has not thought "wow, there are just too many cases, something is not right here" unless they are not some way incentivized to not think about it. It is also hard to believe that someone who had a genuine intention of helping players to not also have the same thought about not just bc.game (despite it being a clearly leading culprit according to the data posted by gh0573d) but also about other casinos.

I understand your stance and thought the same. But the thing is: BCgame have very "positive" history in solving all the cases and providing various "evidence" of players' wrongdoing is something that he never questioned. Because, at the end, why would they be lying?

As for other players, they became dismissive after they got the public "resolution" thinking they actually did something wrong, it just can't be that every ADR is telling them they did something wrong, yet they "claim" they didn't? They never questioned all of those as they were not sure. I am. And will go through each and every court there is to get my funds, to prove their ill intentions and hopefully by the end of next week, get court seizure approved and get both bc.game and bcgame.com suspended. At that point, their reputation and their intentions won't be questioned anymore. It will be facts.

On the other side, lets look at my case specifically. They want to convince me I actually:

- Created third account
- Self-referred that account to my main one
- While I was having $1m in Vault in my main account
- And jeopardize of getting my funds taken just (according to blurry image) for mere $250 deposit
- While that third account was never in fact banned?

Nah, not going to happen.

---

small victory!

Just been informed that court has validated our request for asset seizure in case against Fenice Tech Limited (owners of BC game) and has scheduled expedited hearing next Wednesday.

If approved, both domains bc.game and bcgame.com will be suspended after such request is approved. Including all of their assets in Cyprus.

We just received a notification from Curacao that BC.game operators did try to lift the bankruptcy ruling off of Small House BV and/or Blockdance BV through their lawfirm - Ox-Law.

Sorry folks, not going to happen. I'd suggest you watch out closely on future developments :)

I don't need to talk more, they already proven to be actual scammers by trying to avoid outcome of legal decisions in both Cyprus and Curacao in regards to asset seizure/recovery by trying to change domain ownership and switching registrars:

https://talkimg.com/images/2025/06/07/UXxemb.png

Thankfully, both court and registrars are aware of such behavior and this just developed further into criminal activities (as there are already such about to be filed in Cyprus).

Hi! To all!

I want to destroy BC.game.
This week I lost 4 BTC there.
No KYC, no verification of funds. 100% manipulation.

Let's unite efforts to get this bitch. Share with me the address of its founders and office!

I have decided to share my story. Next week I will upload a video on YouTube.
Now my X page.

https://x.com/AdrianLost10BTC

Let's make a class action against bc.game

Share please more info about this lawsuit. I want to join it.

My opinion - main court is media and community.
BC.game fucked all regulators (bc did not paid to Spanish regulator as I know and still to the UK regulator).

My registration was Nov 2, 2023. But I did not use account regularly.

Not sure whether or not should I release this but just received proof by DFI showing actual fraud taking place.

If you lost playing their game, you'll have a lot more trouble recovering anything/proving their games are manipulated without concrete evidence. gho0573d has his funds confiscated, not lost to the games. The cases are different so I doubt you will be able to join the same case.


What would be the reason not to release it? What is the estimated time frame before these frauds are taken offline?


I didn't quite understand you though the big question is how many people have their funds locked and do not post on the forum (maybe due to language barrier, not being able to/wanting to complete the KYC to begin with, or other reasons)



I'm sure they try to convince many players of wrongdoing, especially as the number gets larger.


Congratulations :) I'm following and supporting this case as I've done enough reading and researching to know that bc.game are a fraudulent entity. I do hope you are not trolling with your journey, and are succeeding as you say you are. One thing that I am concerned about is how fast this is moving. I have never heard of a case move through courts so quickly. Usually the legal process is a very long and painful one.

As I'm still newbie in terms of "cutting" quotes, I'll address them in order.

1 - It contains personally identifiable information on parties involved - specifically UBO of Blockdance and Director of Fenice Tech Limited (although director's name is already public). I am willing to share this finding for confirmation with admin/mod. Also, please note that this finding includes involvement of illegal activities by their lawyer at a time.

2 - Many people follow steps on trying to recover their account, steps being: inquire casino, ADR request. Very few stops there thinking that ADRs decision is final, although none of them ever seen any supporting evidence in cases against them when ADR decides it's (Rejected). I've seen few examples here on Bitcointalk where after "ruling" was made that there is supporting evidence to reject the claim, player replied "I am sure I did nothing wrong" and just went on their way either playing somewhere else or not playing at all. Those who goes to collect their winnings legally, in most cases (when casino is reasonable enough) either see the evidence even before it hits the court (response to legal demand) or settle. In case of BC.game, none of the evidence ever existed even when it was presented to the court (in my case), and only appeared after I have publicly called them out or seek ADR process months after legal course.

3 - Unfortunately, this is their MO. I am (at this moment) aware of three other cases, one being $600k and others $750k and $500k being pursued legally.

4 - Well, it's not moving quickly. In regards to that "small victory" court only assessed whether or not we had a valid reasons to file such request, or it was baseless, and made decision to schedule a hearing where we will be providing evidence on which court will determine whether or not to grant such request. This was expedited hearing, and if such is processed, assets of Fenice Tech Limited (including domains bc.game and bcgame.com) will be frozen until actual case against them is finalized. So yeah, although ruling on our request will be swift, waiting for final decision will still be slow.

We're also working with bankruptcy trustee to proceed with asset recovery phase, where we have enough supporting evidence to get the domain name bc.game under her control, and possibly attempt to sell it in order to fund the claims against their legal entities in Curacao.

That's fine. If it helps for future reference, you can open the quote with
which is created when you click the quote button (in this example I clicked quote on your latest post).

Close the quote (for each quote you create) with


I see. Yes, don't post personally identifiable information as it will result in your thread being moved to the Investigations (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=227.0) board which is off limits to the public and even some low level ranks, resulting in reduced visibility. Though if you want to publish this information (or want someone to publish it for you) I fully support you doing so, and would be happy to post that information in that board (as it's allowed there) considering bc.game are basically a criminal organization.


I agree with all of that. Legal action is not an easy process from the view of time or resources. Many would accept the outcome even if they disagree with it. Some might not understand and give up. That is my problem with the notion of what bc.game do and prey on. They "settle" here on bitcointalk when the matter reaches the public view (for smaller cases than this one, at least) though when it doesn't, it's money in their pocket.



I wonder how many other cases there might be if 100% of victims had a case running. That aside, if this is their MO and these cases are running, what do you say or think about those who are promoting bc.game? Do you think that the ethical thing to do is pause those efforts? Would you go as far to say that they are even guilty in a way for doing so? I am quite sure that promoters are aware of the scam nature (though won't say much about it since those scammed funds are probably what's enabling bc.game to have such an exorbitant advertising budget), though with benefit of the doubt, I'd like to hear your opinion.


I see, this makes a lot more sense. Thank you for explaining this and everything prior.


While a premium domain, I doubt the domain would go for much if the casino is implicated. The only way I could see it going for a lot is if they buy it back themselves, or if a competitor buys it to take over the brand. Both of which will only prolong the centralized crypto casino problem. That's my opinion at least, not entirely relevant or within the scope of your goals (which I'm not judging/is fair given that you would be trying to recover funds for victims of bc.game).

I'd be happy to pass it on, please DM me your e-mail.

Probably hundreds. I already showed (either here or in another topic) comparison on number of complaints at ADRs between Stake (industry dominant according to Tanzanite) vs BC.game, where BC.game has 10x more complaints opened against them.

As for me accusing promoters, well that's tricky. While I understand their position, which (imho) is right - innocent until proven otherwise, I believe there is a question of whether or not it's an ethical thing to do. And it's something I wouldn't want to do just yet.


edit: found it. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5088875.msg65452951#msg65452951


Well, your opinion is kinda goal. If you look at their sponsorships, most of their sponsors advertise "BC.GAME", a domain directly. If said domain is either seized (aka suspended pending court decision) or controlled/auctioned by bankruptcy trustee, there is a high possibility of either them trying to acquire it back and settling for full amount on cases + interests or simply selling the domain name to (possibly) competitor along with the brand ownership, to which they would own full rights to BC.GAME brand and any further operation of actual BC.GAME would be further involvement in crime operation: brand infringement.

Further demonstration of their scam behavior:

https://talkimg.com/images/2025/06/11/Uds0ag.png

It has become a pointless exercise for anybody to try to defend BC Game. They have allowed for a situation to occur where their conduct is being questioned by many members for the forum.

If BC Game want to limit the damage to their reputation, they have to focus on repairing the low-level of customer services they provide to their customers.

Not sure there is reputation to be saved. Unfortunately their ad campaigns across all channels (BitcoinTalk included) portrays reputable casino, while I've became aware numerous of claims being submitted against them and proving otherwise, being complete scam ops.

For example, only two cases (most recent ones) are totaling $2.5m, excluding all others. If you add up the ones already validated and to be paid by Curacao/trustee, that's solely $5m in 5 cases.

Not to mention those being reviewed by the lawyer at the moment, or the ones being pursued through other law firms.

As their reputation sinks further and further in to the gutter, I wonder if they will eventually opt for an exit-scam. If they were serious about their reputation they would be engaging with those that claim to have been scammed. Their business practices and list of complaints are evidence enough they need to change course otherwise they will have literally zero reputation left.

Another update:

Leicester FC has silently cancelled BCgame partnership.

It's clear that this forum and the members who are keeping bc.game running longer than it should are going to continue to help bc.game milk the cow until nothing is left. When they stop spending funds on advertising or when they are legally required to cease operation, they will surely disappear. They are already freezing accounts and selectively stealing from players, there's no reason to believe they will let people withdraw before they close down.

I hope that the forum reprimands those who have been enabling the scam, as even though they will have made a massive amount of money for enabling it for so long, they should at least lose their reputation here for keeping it running. If they aren't, that will prove a massive level of corruption on the forum for enabling and prolonging such a scam, and allowing members who enabled it to continue being recognised as credible members here. If it weren't for these members (who are very aware of what is going on by this point and clearly negligent of as to what is right and wrong), bc.game might have been ousted as a scam and may already have been closed by now, or at least would have lost its reputation.

I would not be surprised if Leicester City decided to unilaterally cancel their agreement. I searched online but did not find anything at all related to Leicester City cancelling their BC Game sponsorship. Do you have a link in order for us to verify this?

Can you elaborate by providing names that you think are keeping BC Game going longer than it should?

The forum itself will not reprimand any members for anything they might have done, that is not how things work. If members get together and form consensus, they could tag accounts but for that to happen there has to be a case. If you feel strongly about this you should at least provide names along with posts that prove some sort of collusion because you cannot make a case without evidence.

Primarily the users who are in charge of advertising/marketing and public relations/complaint management. They would be very aware of the malpractice, and should already be criticizing bc.game instead of putting in efforts that enable them to continue.

The names can come out when it's time for them to come out, as I've already been punished and had my credibility damaged for pointing the main source out in the past. Just check the two red ratings on my profile for the one who is enabling them via advertising/marketing. There are others, but I don't want to be painted red by them too. For an idea of who is enabling the scam to continue, just by look at who is running the campaigns and handling their complaints for them, despite being made aware that bc.game is a selectively scamming and fraudulent casino operation.


The community should reprimand accomplice/enabler of any crime or scam, though whether they do or don't is up to them. I am sure we can agree that in a community where fairness and justice are core values, reprimanding enablers through negative trust ratings and flags is what should be done.

As for evidence, when bc.game falls, a lot of efforts and posts made in the past will become evidence. There's enough evidence to prove that members who are extensively putting efforts into advertising/marketing and public relations/complaint management would be aware of the hundreds of complaints being posted against them, and are making extensive efforts to keep the scam going (as opposed to criticizing it and asking key questions like, "why are so many complaints being posted per day?", "how many people aren't posting complaints and aren't having their cases resolved?" and "should I really be advocating/putting efforts into a casino that is freezing funds of so many players, and refusing to give them support unless they speak up?")

The only conclusion that can drawn from your post is that the campaign/bounty manager by virtue of running their campaign is complicit in any scam that BC Game could be involved with. If that is the case then two very important statements should be made.

First, if it applies to BC Game then the same principle has to apply to all casinos that are using the forum to promote their business. Second, unless there is a constant stream of complaints against a casino/gaming website that remain unresolved, a campaign manager would probably not consider severing ties.

I know Hhampuz stopped the campaign after too many complaints were made again freebitcoin. It takes a campaign manager with integrity to walk away from managing a campaign when selective scamming accusations are made. Did you contact the campaign manager to ask him why he is promoting BC Game when they have many scam accusations again them?

Keeping that aside, the fact you stated you did not want to elaborate on names/posts (because you believe you will receive negative trust) means that you are limiting yourself to self-imposed censorship. I would advise you and all others to take a different approach and be free to post as you feel appropriate.

When I said silently, that means there is no official info. If you go through web archive of both Leicester and BCgame, you would find:

1 - Partnership banner of bcgame on Leciester FCs website
2 - Way too many references to BCgame on Leciester's socials
3 - BCgame references on that sponsorship on LCFC on BCg landing

Since the end of May (end of Premier League as well), partnership banners on LCFC website were taken down, jerseys were changed to King Power, no ads for BCgame on socials and just few days ago, BCgame has removed landing banner showing they are the sponsors of LC FC.

These nuances are something that the wider community should consider and discuss, though in my opinion the first problem to deal with is the largest one. After that, there is precedent. At this time, bc.game is the largest problem.


There is seemingly no integrity when it comes to bc.game and its affiliates. I have already stated publicly that it is wrong to promote or conduct public relations for a service that has a large flow of scam accusations as it highlights that the growing likelihood that there are people who are not being supported and are being scammed. An innocent and logical person would understand this point and cease association with the service. Its affiliates have not - they have instead willfully ignored the point, and continued to provide bc.game with paid or "free" assistance. The responses I receive is that I am a troll, that I am a charlatan, and so on (as all falsely labelled on my profile).


I'm not interested in more back and forth with them. We know who we are speaking about. When bc.game collapses, I'll name names. For now, I don't have mental energy for more debate, and more fake and damaging trust ratings on my profile.

It has become pointless discussing whether or not they are scammers or no.

If you just check all ADR complaints against BC.game, you can clearly see a pattern, where huge winner's account become instant "multiple account" rule breaker, yet when anyone inquires to get verifiable piece of information on that rule being broken, you are not allowed to see.

If we disregard my complaint and just use common practice in privacy laws - data protection (GDPR in Europe and similar in other parts of the world), it clearly shows that they don't even follow those rules, because you are unable to view data related to "possibly" your account, and if they claim it was/is yours, they should be able to show you that data.

Now on the other hand, lets look at their "Vaults Pro" rules/faq (this is also part of the evidence in another case against them):

https://talkimg.com/images/2025/07/15/UAn4Gg.png
https://talkimg.com/images/2025/07/15/UAn5yI.png

Using their own words, assets in Vault Pro belongs to players and shouldn't be touched by anyone other than the depositor.

By banning player's accounts (from gambling platform), they are effectively holding depositors' money hostage from the depositors (trading/investment "platform", yeah they have defined Vault Pro differently), effectively breaking their own Terms, who knows how many laws and showing further their scamming behavior.

Now, to get back at "enablement" by running the campaign or advertising bc.game, I totally agree with BenCodie that anyone who's enabling further business by advertising them is effectively part of their scam operation. Not directly in any way, but enabling BC.game to find another victim in present/future time.

Having said that and understanding forum's "free speech" policy, campaign manager (@Little Mouse) is the one effectively "running" their scam operations at this present moment, and would be the one to really ask himself whether or not money is worth possibly losing his reputation in (near or distant) future because of them.

EDIT: Just checked [Scam Accusations] sub-forum, and in only first 3 pages, 12 entries are against BC.game, with only one of them being successfully resolved. Shouldn't that raise some eyebrows? That accounts for 10% of all complaints within those 3 pages (as I see 40 topics per page).
 

BC Game has a multi-million USD$ turnover therefore the very least that can be expected from them is to provide excellent customer services. I have posted in some of the thread that you mentioned, the latest being this one: BC.game KYC failed - account temporarily unaviable - frozen 29ETH (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5549103.0)

It seems pointless for any member of the forum to defend BC Game when they are no longer trustworthy. Also, judging by their lack of engagement within the forum it seems they have no respect for any of their customers that make complaints against them.

What a lie! I have gone through and found at least 6 lol, and for the rest, here's what happened to other cases.

The summaries are for users who don't have time to read the scam accusation thread but don't want to discuss the reputation of the casino. It'll save your time.

1. BC GAME SCAMMERS - RIGGED ORIGINALS TOWER GAME (WITH PROOF) (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5550116.0)
Not a scam accusation yet

2. BC.game KYC failed - account temporarily unaviable - frozen 29ETH (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5549103.0)
Self admitted that they bypassed self-exclusion.

3. BC.GAME withdrawal suspended. Am I getting scammed?! (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5549320.0)
German Citizen, supposed to be blocked, but he must be using a VPN to bypass. The case still has things that need to be discussed, though.

4. BC.Game: Fraudulent Crash Game + Account Suspension After Reporting — My Full Ex (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5549279.0)
Not a scam accusation, provided a wrong UID (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5549279.msg65581685#msg65581685) as well, because the UID OP shared was inactive from 2023. See the reply made by user Mahdirakib (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5549279.msg65571449#msg65571449)

5. ⚠️SCAM⚠️ BC.game - refusing to pay $1.5m, switched jurisdiction to avoid paying (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5543228.0)
Holydarkness had a long investigation and shared his final verdict (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5543228.msg65448680#msg65448680). Casinoguru also favored bcgame- https://casino.guru/bc-game-casino-player-s-account-has-been-closed-without-3

6. Bc.game scamming me for my money (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5547093.0)
OP made claims that they didn't get a few deposits that they had made before 60 days. Does it make sense? There was no pending deposit for the account. OP was asked to provide some data (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5547093.msg65558478#msg65558478) but haven't replied since.

7. BC GAMES (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5546028.0)
Self-excluded, no scam happened either.

8. BC.Game locked account after being very active on chat (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5537226.0)
No amount was scammed. He was marked as a bonus abuser and got banned.

9. BC.Game Withdrawal Issue – Delayed Payment, No Resolution (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5542308.0)
Delayed withdrawal. Haven't made a single update after posting the thread. No information attached. So, it's not an accusation even.

10. BCGAME SCAM $6K+ cancelling sportsbook bets after they already won (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5544091.0)
The decision was made by odds provider Betby

11. Is BC.Game’s Weekly Raffle Rigged? No Wins in 3 Years and Questions About Banned (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5543457.0)
He didn't win weekly raffle in a 3 year and made the post, not a scam accusation.


Yet, you can't see that the user self-excluded himself and bypassed.

I believe that if by any chance bcgame turns out to be a full-blown scam, Little Mouse would be the first to cease all service with them.  In any case, it is right to have a precautionary attitude towards every casino, but it is also true that most of the accusations of fraud towards the various casinos are often unfounded accusations, or without any tangible evidence

First, let me show you some other facts and I'd like to see you go through every ADR case and defend them one by one, because most of these are "rejected" or resolved in BCG favor:




On the other note,case number 5 is already decided by court (not the ADR or holy) in player's favor (among 4 other cases), yet where's BCG honoring court's ruling? Nah, they evaded jurisdiction, discussed and actually fabricated evidence (and faked company sale, there is also phone call plus evidence for that).

@Lillominato89 - Sorry but court's ruling and trustee's validation is not sufficient confirmation for you that BCG is full blown scam operation? Rven further, them avoiding those rulings and refusing to honor court's decision?

---

EDIT

Forgot to mention, @BenCodie has also seen fabricated evidence by either BCG or their lawyer at a time, which, once pulled together with that phone call between Mario Galea and Fabiano clearly shows intention of scamming players. Furthermore, BC.game and BCgame.com domains were owned by Blockdance up until December 24th, 20204, so "company being sold to another entity" story is a nice bedtime story for kids or people ignoring the facts...

---

Just seen I never posted desperate and failed attempt by BC.game to remain naming sponsor of Leicester FC: registering BC.game trademark using another shell company (Flowix Limited), so they could keep their scam operations on float.

https://trademarks.ipo.gov.uk/ipo-tmcase/page/Results/1/UK00004204136

I must admit, after dealing with BC.Game for over two months, I am not surprised to find this thread.

On June 19, 2025, I set a $60 daily loss limit at BC.Game with a balance of $1,560. The site confirmed limits would take effect immediately. The tool failed, and I lost over $1,500.

My Casino Guru complaint includes extensive evidence, including support chat records and screenshots from the day of the incident, proving the limit was activated on June 19.

BC.Game has engaged in dishonesty unlike anything I have ever seen in business, falsely claiming the limit was set on June 26 and ignoring clear evidence. For two months, they have refused to cooperate in good faith with the Casino Guru complaint.

On August 15, support agent Turus admitted the loss limit tool is defective and that developers had already received an optimization request. Even with this admission, BC.Game continues to deny responsibility and spread false narratives.

This conduct reflects BC.Game’s history of misconduct, including being declared bankrupt in Curaçao in 2024 after failing to pay millions in winnings and losing its UK gambling license.

Their tactics include:
• Ignoring complaints for months
• Flagging truthful Trustpilot reviews as defamatory
• Closing tickets unilaterally while withholding evidence

I am preparing to issue a press release to major industry outlets (iGB, Gambling Insider, Casino.org, EGR Global, Gambling News, iGaming Expert).

I will also be notifying BC.Game’s sponsorship partners and brand ambassadors (O’Higgins FC, Jason Derulo, Colby Covington, Miami Pickleball Club) of their irresponsible and dishonest conduct.

Hey, I get it you want word out and want to do everything you can to try to get reimbursed for what you deem to be faulty coding or outright incompetence, but please stop posting the same message everywhere. You have now posted this same message in 3 spots when you only needed to post it in 1 spot which was your scam accusation.

HERE (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5088875.msg65718106#msg65718106) you posted it in their main thread, and HERE (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5556232.msg65718517#msg65718517) you posted it in scam accusations.

Please read the Unofficial rules (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703657.0) of the forum and get familiar with them if you plan to use this forum. You are breaking rule 12 doing what you are doing. People are trying to help you in the scam accusation, stick to that thread for updates.

Another interesting finding:

It appears that BC.game has even scammed their own employees - Legal Counsel from Hong Kong. Found this guy's contact on the bankruptcy findings: https://social.card3.co/profile?card_code=Xua80T

https://talkimg.com/images/2025/09/12/UCA509.png
https://talkimg.com/images/2025/09/12/UCAOzW.png

So, I'd appreciate @holydarkness telling me they are not the scammers? Same question for @Little Mouse.

Unfortunately, both of these members make a lot of money from bc.game. I doubt (even with irrefutable proof) that you'll get any kind of admission from them, or anyone on this forum who associates with them.

I have given up on the fight against the bc.game/gambling conglomerate for now and it has completely turned me off being active on this forum, not just because it has corrupted so many (which was becoming more and more sickening each day I was online), but also as it excluded me from any incentive from being on the forum, even as a legendary member - all because I spoke out against corruption, the people who are likely to be involved in it/indirectly propagating it through neglect or intentional/unintentional silence, and refused to post in favor of gambling establishments.

It's clear that bc.game have such a tight grip on this forum and its members, and that they will continue to get away with their countless acts of fraud for as long as authorities in and outside of this forum let them...which unfortunately, could be a long time, considering that the power of crypto casinos is clearly way beyond what any regulator can currently control.

I hope you find a way to get justice @gh0573d. I wish you luck and support, and will stop in to see progress every once in a while.