[Call to action] BC.game is not entity that should be trusted.

[holydarkness]

My opinion on this topic? I can't say yet, as this thread is designed by OP to address the matters surrounding BC globally. I am yet to touch any aspect pointed in this thread as I'm currently chasing OP's other thread that focused on and limited to his own case with BC. I think I'm very close with the bottom of that thread, just waiting for some posts and reply from both sides as I'm currently doing another double-blind test on them.

I'll move to this thread once I managed to deliver my final findings on the other thread.

You can't say because you are doing their public relations for them.

The unbiased opinion that bc.game is a fraudulent casino that is using sophisticated legal tactics to scam unsuspecting players and to escape any legal prosecution, and are taking advantage of players who do not create a scam accusation thread in this forum, is growing. BC.game's time is limited.

I tried to tell you that you are wrapped up in helping a fraudulent casino and yet you continue to be a "free" PR rep for them. Though, I still maintain my opinion that you receive some for of favoring or compensation for work, considering you refuse to explicitly deny that you benefit in any way whatsoever for acting on their behalf as a PR rep. I can't possibly believe that someone who is dealing with so many cases for free (apparently) doesn't stop and think "Oh gee, I what about all the people who aren't making threads about their accounts being frozen?" or "Am I protecting the reputation of criminals/scammers?". Have you ever stopped and thought that, and if so, what were your thoughts and actions after that?

I'm giving my best to ignore you as you derail cases, but... are we doing this dance again?

I've made my statement, it's quite clear and enough for people who simply looking for confirmation instead of throwing muds. Since that statement is not satisfying enough for you, it infers that you're... but hey, my offer still stands, I'll copy-paste exactly what you want me to say, just put your money where your mouth is... or rather your fingers.

Can't help but notice that this thread must be a goldmine to you, though. If I can help the player, you'll gleefully said, "Look, BC paid because they're cornered. If OP never create his thread, BC will run with his money." If I can't get OP to get his fund though, it'll be "See? holydarkness is covering for BC". Such a win-win scenario for someone with dysfunctional spine.

But hey, here's a little wake up call: by saying that casinos are selectively scamming their player with methods you proposed: where they'll steal from people who didn't raise complaints in this forum, you do aware that the scenario also applied to literally every casino on this forum, right? Including the one which signature you're wearing, and pay you?

Were you also accusing me of getting incentive from BetFury for [I believe the word you use here is:] "bridging" between the player and them? Are they also selectively scamming their player and collecting wealth from those who can't sound their protest here? Yet you're still happily wear their sig and receive payments?

Or were they an exception from your understanding of how casinos steal from their players simply because you're wearing their sig?

What ethic is that? Ohh right, you have an entire, no wait, two entire... umm three, discussion with 1miau.

Hhhhh... this is a case of naivette at best and hypocrisy at worst. But yep... put your money where your mouth and fingers are, next time you mention my name and accuse me with those things, it better come with that deal I offer you. Otherwise just shushh, you're just further embarrassing yourself by showing how severe the dysfuctionality of your back is. My two cents though.


OP, sorry, just venting up to my annoyance of one specific bug that keep circling me. You, above all, certainly knows how many pages I read and the length I take to get your case done, and now imagine those effort meet with such post like quoted, just because the person is so morally and ethically challenged that he can't believe people are doing things out of good will. Wait... let's trace it further... the comment was initially birthed because he had a dislike with a CM of BC, I believe, and I'm a collateral victim here that he dragged into the mud just to further his agenda. This post has nothing to do with you, don't mind it.

[gh0573d]

Coming back on-topic, just found out that "false statements" are not so uncommon with BC.game.

Apparently, somewhere in 2019, they've stated they had MGA (Malta Gaming Authority) license. On the other hand, MGA says following:

https://www.mga.org.mt/player-hub/unauthorised-urls/

Unauthorised URLs

The Malta Gaming Authority (MGA) is hereby declaring that it has no connection with the below listed URLs. Any reference to the MGA and/or gaming licence/s said to be issued by the Maltese Authority, as stated on these domains, is false and misleading.

The MGA would like to remind consumers not to utilise services provided by an entity unless they have ascertained that the entity in question is authorised to provide such services by the MGA.  The gaming regulatory framework obliges authorised persons to comply with strict legal requirements in the interest of consumers. The activities of unlicensed entities are unregulated and do not provide the necessary safeguards delineated by virtue of the framework, making transactions with such entities risky for consumers.

[Kavelj22]

Apparently, somewhere in 2019, they've stated they had MGA (Malta Gaming Authority) license. On the other hand, MGA says following:

MGA has officially announced that it has no connection with bcgame, as bcgame had previously announced. I found this page on their official website:

The Malta Gaming Authority (MGA) is hereby declaring that it has no connection with bc.game. Any reference to the MGA and/or gaming licence/s said to be issued by the Maltese Authority, as stated by bc.game, are false and misleading.

I also looked for where bcgame might have made this claim and found nothing, including no discussion on any forums or mention of it on any news sites.

I don't think bcgame can be held accountable for this, given that the statement is outdated and dates back to 2019. Even if it did, bcgame could be considered to have overlooked the error and officially sought a license from Curacao.

[gh0573d]

Apparently, somewhere in 2019, they've stated they had MGA (Malta Gaming Authority) license. On the other hand, MGA says following:

MGA has officially announced that it has no connection with bcgame, as bcgame had previously announced. I found this page on their official website:

The Malta Gaming Authority (MGA) is hereby declaring that it has no connection with bc.game. Any reference to the MGA and/or gaming licence/s said to be issued by the Maltese Authority, as stated by bc.game, are false and misleading.

I also looked for where bcgame might have made this claim and found nothing, including no discussion on any forums or mention of it on any news sites.

I don't think bcgame can be held accountable for this, given that the statement is outdated and dates back to 2019. Even if it did, bcgame could be considered to have overlooked the error and officially sought a license from Curacao.

After properly inquiring, this list includes all sites that (at some point) claimed to be MGA licensed, while they were not. Can they be held accountable? No. Does this further cement my claims of them issuing false statements and/or fabrication of some sort? Hell yeah

I've asked AI: "I want to play on BC.game. Should I trust it?" (please note although I highly believe that AI are giving you reasonable doubt, they can still throw "delusional" answers):

[gh0573d]

Company Twocent Technology Limited doesn't exist in Belize registry?

[BenCodie]

I think the vast majority that have an interest in these threads would probably disagree with your comments about the public relations. In the end, if a member does not agree with a point of view does not necessarily mean they are corrupt. I think these types of allegations do not help the situation especially when someone is claiming they were a victim of a scam.

My opinion on this topic? I can't say yet, as this thread is designed by OP to address the matters surrounding BC globally. I am yet to touch any aspect pointed in this thread as I'm currently chasing OP's other thread that focused on and limited to his own case with BC. I think I'm very close with the bottom of that thread, just waiting for some posts and reply from both sides as I'm currently doing another double-blind test on them.

I'll move to this thread once I managed to deliver my final findings on the other thread.

You can't say because you are doing their public relations for them.

The unbiased opinion that bc.game is a fraudulent casino that is using sophisticated legal tactics to scam unsuspecting players and to escape any legal prosecution, and are taking advantage of players who do not create a scam accusation thread in this forum, is growing. BC.game's time is limited.

I tried to tell you that you are wrapped up in helping a fraudulent casino and yet you continue to be a "free" PR rep for them. Though, I still maintain my opinion that you receive some for of favoring or compensation for work, considering you refuse to explicitly deny that you benefit in any way whatsoever for acting on their behalf as a PR rep. I can't possibly believe that someone who is dealing with so many cases for free (apparently) doesn't stop and think "Oh gee, I what about all the people who aren't making threads about their accounts being frozen?" or "Am I protecting the reputation of criminals/scammers?". Have you ever stopped and thought that, and if so, what were your thoughts and actions after that?

Here is the trust rating that bc.game left on holydarkness' profile before it was removed:


Making invaluable contributions to the brand's reputation through handling their disputes for them, is handling their public relations for them, wouldn't you agree? This is the perspective of bc.game themselves.

My opinion on this topic? I can't say yet, as this thread is designed by OP to address the matters surrounding BC globally. I am yet to touch any aspect pointed in this thread as I'm currently chasing OP's other thread that focused on and limited to his own case with BC. I think I'm very close with the bottom of that thread, just waiting for some posts and reply from both sides as I'm currently doing another double-blind test on them.

I'll move to this thread once I managed to deliver my final findings on the other thread.

You can't say because you are doing their public relations for them.

The unbiased opinion that bc.game is a fraudulent casino that is using sophisticated legal tactics to scam unsuspecting players and to escape any legal prosecution, and are taking advantage of players who do not create a scam accusation thread in this forum, is growing. BC.game's time is limited.

I tried to tell you that you are wrapped up in helping a fraudulent casino and yet you continue to be a "free" PR rep for them. Though, I still maintain my opinion that you receive some for of favoring or compensation for work, considering you refuse to explicitly deny that you benefit in any way whatsoever for acting on their behalf as a PR rep. I can't possibly believe that someone who is dealing with so many cases for free (apparently) doesn't stop and think "Oh gee, I what about all the people who aren't making threads about their accounts being frozen?" or "Am I protecting the reputation of criminals/scammers?". Have you ever stopped and thought that, and if so, what were your thoughts and actions after that?

I'm giving my best to ignore you as you derail cases, but... are we doing this dance again?

I've made my statement, it's quite clear and enough for people who simply looking for confirmation instead of throwing muds. Since that statement is not satisfying enough for you, it infers that you're... but hey, my offer still stands, I'll copy-paste exactly what you want me to say, just put your money where your mouth is... or rather your fingers.

Can't help but notice that this thread must be a goldmine to you, though. If I can help the player, you'll gleefully said, "Look, BC paid because they're cornered. If OP never create his thread, BC will run with his money." If I can't get OP to get his fund though, it'll be "See? holydarkness is covering for BC". Such a win-win scenario for someone with dysfunctional spine.

But hey, here's a little wake up call: by saying that casinos are selectively scamming their player with methods you proposed: where they'll steal from people who didn't raise complaints in this forum, you do aware that the scenario also applied to literally every casino on this forum, right? Including the one which signature you're wearing, and pay you?

Were you also accusing me of getting incentive from BetFury for [I believe the word you use here is:] "bridging" between the player and them? Are they also selectively scamming their player and collecting wealth from those who can't sound their protest here? Yet you're still happily wear their sig and receive payments?

Or were they an exception from your understanding of how casinos steal from their players simply because you're wearing their sig?

What ethic is that? Ohh right, you have an entire, no wait, two entire... umm three, discussion with 1miau.

Hhhhh... this is a case of naivette at best and hypocrisy at worst. But yep... put your money where your mouth and fingers are, next time you mention my name and accuse me with those things, it better come with that deal I offer you. Otherwise just shushh, you're just further embarrassing yourself by showing how severe the dysfuctionality of your back is. My two cents though.


OP, sorry, just venting up to my annoyance of one specific bug that keep circling me. You, above all, certainly knows how many pages I read and the length I take to get your case done, and now imagine those effort meet with such post like quoted, just because the person is so morally and ethically challenged that he can't believe people are doing things out of good will. Wait... let's trace it further... the comment was initially birthed because he had a dislike with a CM of BC, I believe, and I'm a collateral victim here that he dragged into the mud just to further his agenda. This post has nothing to do with you, don't mind it.

It's already clear to many that bc.game only resolve cases that are posted on this forum to both protect their reputation here and likely because when "bc.game scam" is searched, only resolved cases are shown (creating the guise that bc.game is legitimate). It's already clear that you handle PR for them and other casinos, most likely for a reward from somewhere (direct or indirect) and that it isn't done for free (despite the word magic you continue to use around the topic).

You can keep dragging me into the conversation and wasting your time with your words, call me dysfunctional, write word walls to try and tarnish what my words mean, and so on, though it means very little to me. The truth is (no matter what you say about or to me) is that you are a part of keeping the bc.game scam machine alive, as well as other casinos here.

I've asked AI: "I want to play on BC.game. Should I trust it?" (please note although I highly believe that AI are giving you reasonable doubt, they can still throw "delusional" answers):

It should be noted too that (depending on if you are using chatgpt for free or not) it's knowledge may not be up to the current date.

[JollyGood]

Apparently, somewhere in 2019, they've stated they had MGA (Malta Gaming Authority) license. On the other hand, MGA says following:

MGA has officially announced that it has no connection with bcgame, as bcgame had previously announced. I found this page on their official website:

The Malta Gaming Authority (MGA) is hereby declaring that it has no connection with bc.game. Any reference to the MGA and/or gaming licence/s said to be issued by the Maltese Authority, as stated by bc.game, are false and misleading.

I also looked for where bcgame might have made this claim and found nothing, including no discussion on any forums or mention of it on any news sites.

I don't think bcgame can be held accountable for this, given that the statement is outdated and dates back to 2019. Even if it did, bcgame could be considered to have overlooked the error and officially sought a license from Curacao.

Online casinos do not overlook licencing authorities where their casinos are supposed to be registered. If BC Game made that claim it could not have been by accident. Their reputation is becoming a problem but they only have themselves to blame.

Here is the trust rating that bc.game left on holydarkness' profile before it was removed:


Making invaluable contributions to the brand's reputation through handling their disputes for them, is handling their public relations for them, wouldn't you agree? This is the perspective of bc.game themselves.

Just because they have an opinion of one member it does not mean the sentiments are mutual. What is the difference if BC Game left a tag for you stating the exact words: "A wonderful user who has made an invaluable contribution to our brands reputation" and then members used that feedback to attack you? It is a one-sided feedback.

[holydarkness]

It's already clear to many that bc.game only resolve cases that are posted on this forum to both protect their reputation here and likely because when "bc.game scam" is searched, only resolved cases are shown (creating the guise that bc.game is legitimate). It's already clear that you handle PR for them and other casinos, most likely for a reward from somewhere (direct or indirect) and that it isn't done for free (despite the word magic you continue to use around the topic).

You can keep dragging me into the conversation and wasting your time with your words, call me dysfunctional, write word walls to try and tarnish what my words mean, and so on, though it means very little to me. The truth is (no matter what you say about or to me) is that you are a part of keeping the bc.game scam machine alive, as well as other casinos here.
[...]

By me keeping the scam machine alive, BC as well as there casinos... you're referring to the casinos on this forum? Including the casinos which signature you're currently wearing?

As for "word magic", you can get exactly what you ask for, the exact statement word-for-word letter-for-letter character-for-character, an exact copy paste of,

[...]
How about this:
"I, holydarkness, do not receive any form of incentive or financial motivation (from any party whatsoever) to communicate with casinos to resolve scam accusations for users."
[...]

All you need is to agree for my terms,

[...]
So, the agreement will still stands, with a bit of modification. I'll say what you asked above, copy and paste them, to be exactly as you instructed. But if in the future, someone ever use the statement and/or the situation, verbatim or semantically, in a negative connotation, just like what you did above, [and to make it abundantly clear, the word "bridge", used like above quoted, is obviously and automatically fall into the semantic category of the statement], you'll pay me 25,000 USD for every time the situation occurs, as well as explaining to the public of that self-proclaimed thingy or whatever semantic and/or verbatim word they used. Stressing the point, as I am fair, it'll only take effect if it's used in negative connotation.
[...]

But... wait. Of course you can't agree to it, because when you do, you'll be the first one paying me, as you're the one that actively throwing that jabs with negative connotation at me. So the only option will be that you'll lose something to smear me certain color, of which... is your main agenda here, or you'll lose significant fund by time. Certainly that's the only reason why you can't agree to the terms, right? Because... I'm more than ready to swore that oath above. Just waiting for your move.

[BenCodie]

It's already clear to many that bc.game only resolve cases that are posted on this forum to both protect their reputation here and likely because when "bc.game scam" is searched, only resolved cases are shown (creating the guise that bc.game is legitimate). It's already clear that you handle PR for them and other casinos, most likely for a reward from somewhere (direct or indirect) and that it isn't done for free (despite the word magic you continue to use around the topic).

You can keep dragging me into the conversation and wasting your time with your words, call me dysfunctional, write word walls to try and tarnish what my words mean, and so on, though it means very little to me. The truth is (no matter what you say about or to me) is that you are a part of keeping the bc.game scam machine alive, as well as other casinos here.
[...]

By me keeping the scam machine alive, BC as well as there casinos... you're referring to the casinos on this forum? Including the casinos which signature you're currently wearing?

As for "word magic", you can get exactly what you ask for, the exact statement word-for-word letter-for-letter character-for-character, an exact copy paste of,

[...]
How about this:
"I, holydarkness, do not receive any form of incentive or financial motivation (from any party whatsoever) to communicate with casinos to resolve scam accusations for users."
[...]

All you need is to agree for my terms,

[...]
So, the agreement will still stands, with a bit of modification. I'll say what you asked above, copy and paste them, to be exactly as you instructed. But if in the future, someone ever use the statement and/or the situation, verbatim or semantically, in a negative connotation, just like what you did above, [and to make it abundantly clear, the word "bridge", used like above quoted, is obviously and automatically fall into the semantic category of the statement], you'll pay me 25,000 USD for every time the situation occurs, as well as explaining to the public of that self-proclaimed thingy or whatever semantic and/or verbatim word they used. Stressing the point, as I am fair, it'll only take effect if it's used in negative connotation.
[...]

But... wait. Of course you can't agree to it, because when you do, you'll be the first one paying me, as you're the one that actively throwing that jabs with negative connotation at me. So the only option will be that you'll lose something to smear me certain color, of which... is your main agenda here, or you'll lose significant fund by time. Certainly that's the only reason why you can't agree to the terms, right? Because... I'm more than ready to swore that oath above. Just waiting for your move.

We're beyond the point of you needing to say that you have no form of incentive for doing what you do. No one would go to the lengths that you go to work for bc.game and other casinos with absolutely no incentive at all. At a minimum, you use the job to fill your campaign quota and to build your reputation as some sort of good samaritan that "helps players" with casino disputes. That's the minimum. I personally believe you are incentivized more than that, as I can't believe that a person could be so negligent of the obvious selective scamming operation that bc.game is conducting.

You can keep on saying I owe you 25k and all that garbage though it doesn't take away from the fact of what you are doing.

Also what "agenda" could I possibly have? What benefit do I get from calling out the problems that your "god's work" is causing? A negative trust rating from icopress is the only reward I've gotten so far. I get no benefit for highlighting your misdeeds. The real agenda is the selective casino scamming. I have no agenda other than pointing out it exists.

Here is the trust rating that bc.game left on holydarkness' profile before it was removed:


Making invaluable contributions to the brand's reputation through handling their disputes for them, is handling their public relations for them, wouldn't you agree? This is the perspective of bc.game themselves.

Just because they have an opinion of one member it does not mean the sentiments are mutual. What is the difference if BC Game left a tag for you stating the exact words: "A wonderful user who has made an invaluable contribution to our brands reputation" and then members used that feedback to attack you? It is a one-sided feedback.

Well, the difference would be through my posts and actions. I am not using that feedback to attack hd, I am simply stating that he is acting as their public relations person (which, he is, as he is handling basically all of their scam accusation threads for them in the exact same way as if he were to be employed by them to do so).

[nutildah]

Nobody needs to bother explaining anything to BenCodie. They are pretty clearly a troll who gets off making unfounded accusations against well established users. And as a well established user, you owe nothing to him. Nobody will ever take his threats or games of "gotcha" seriously, so there's no point in attempting to satisfy his ridiculous demands.

[BenCodie]

Nobody needs to bother explaining anything to BenCodie. They are pretty clearly a troll who gets off making unfounded accusations against well established users. And as a well established user, you owe nothing to him. Nobody will ever take his threats or games of "gotcha" seriously, so there's no point in attempting to satisfy his ridiculous demands.

You are clearly getting off on using your reputation to try and label me as a troll. I am not the only one who is looking at holydarkness and wondering why he is not questioning the fact that bc.game are having so many scam accusations against them and also wondering about anyone who is not making a scam accusation thread, and how much has been permanently locked and never resolved with bc.game.

The fact that you are not acknowledging that and additionally pinning me as a troll is neglect for a very legitimate concern with that casino, shows that you are more concerned with invalidating any of what I have to say over the safety of other community members than stopping the obvious problem that is selective scamming by casinos (where bc.game is clearly one of the clear main culprits).

Both you and holydarkness had opportunities to just make a simple statement that you have no involvement in activities that relate to corruption within the community, you both refused repeatedly and now, try to pin me as a troll because I put you both on the spot. As I've said plenty of times, you can continue to call what I say unfounded, it means nothing to me nor should it mean anything to anyone. Just because you are a trusted member and have had their integrity questioned by me, does not mean that you are right in trying to have me known as a troll (which is 100% untrue, my motivation from day one is to fight for what is right, you are obviously not on that page otherwise you'd be looking outside of your tunnel vision that defends other "trusted" members).

[gh0573d]

Their .US "social casino" portion is suspended. Why? I guess there are legal questions, according to EPP code status.





RugCheck marking their token

[JollyGood]

The image being portrayed is definitely as though you are attacking him (even if the intention is the opposite).

As for him working as a public relations person for BC Game, it is not true. BC Game is not the only casino that has scam accusations against them and holydarkness has been active in many scam accusation threads about different casinos too. He volunteers a lot of his time trying to resolve cases, at least that should be acknowledged rather than his reputation being called in to question.

Well, the difference would be through my posts and actions. I am not using that feedback to attack hd, I am simply stating that he is acting as their public relations person (which, he is, as he is handling basically all of their scam accusation threads for them in the exact same way as if he were to be employed by them to do so).

[gh0573d]

Interesting facts:

as for their activity in regards to promotion, that's all the activity there is. What about user complaints, court cases, dispute resolution?

Sadly, Your issue is happening behind while the majority here doesn’t have any problem on BC at all. I don’t want to defend BC against their existing case but it’s already being handled legally so let’s just wait what will be the outcome for your legal battle against.

BC is known for resolving all their issue in the past here no matter what is the amount.

Keep us updated.

Actually, there is a vast majority of having issues like me, they (same as I until recently) were never aware of BitcoinTalk or raising our complaints publicly. On the other hand, if you check all recent cases of players v bc.game (except latest one), it appears as if every single case was rejected either here or through ADR, so while you might have positive overview of BC.game operations, that might be just lack of information provided publicly.

As for me and my legal battle, I already won once in Curacao, but they fled the jurisdiction and never paid to single claimant (references: https://next.io/news/regulation/bc-game-withdraws-curacao-gaming-licence/ & https://next.io/news/regulation/bc-game-declared-bankrupt/) or even more recent, non-existent legal entity in Belize?

If I go even further, there are at least two dozen cases pending in SBGOK Foundation and who knows how many at LMS Advocaten (ex-lawyer of foundation).


Let me actually prove my theory:

Lets do comparison between Stake and BCgame. Reason for putting Stake is because of their industry dominance according to Tanzanite (close to 10x more deposits than BC.game).

Now lets look at their stats at ADRs:

Casino.guru
Stake - total 274 complaints
BCgame Casino - 534 total complaints

AskGamblers
Stake - 36 total
Bcgame - 316 total

So, you want to tell me that the industry dominant casino, who has more player base, far more deposits has less complaints than the BCgame and it's just coincidence?

Or that most of resolutions are dismissed immediately? Or bankruptcy ruling was just in vain? Same goes for their avoidance of legal battle in Curacao and "appeal" that never happened?

Come. On.

The image being portrayed is definitely as though you are attacking him (even if the intention is the opposite).

As for him working as a public relations person for BC Game, it is not true. BC Game is not the only casino that has scam accusations against them and holydarkness has been active in many scam accusation threads about different casinos too. He volunteers a lot of his time trying to resolve cases, at least that should be acknowledged rather than his reputation being called in to question.

Well, the difference would be through my posts and actions. I am not using that feedback to attack hd, I am simply stating that he is acting as their public relations person (which, he is, as he is handling basically all of their scam accusation threads for them in the exact same way as if he were to be employed by them to do so).

This is my opinion on holydarkness, and that's based on his previous work as well as work on my case in [Scam Accusation] forum:

He took most underappreciated position in this forum. Period.

I completely understand what he put himself into by "mediating" between two parties and I very much appreciate what he's been doing in my case and many others. Already stated couple of times once my case is solved, I will be compensating him properly.

Now, lets go into his "title" as a mediator: Unfortunately, taking this responsibility, he's been put into difficult position to substantiate operators' accusations against players. Issue with his position bears responsibility of not being able to disclose evidence, and that's somewhat understandable - privacy reasons.

The problem with all of that comes when both parties claims innocence and yet both parties have strong arguments against each other (like in mine case specifically). So on one hand, he is supposed to lean to the players' side, who he (in most cases) just "met" (and in my case, has very fishy history) or, on the other side, to the operator who has established "reputation" (so to say) and believe what he is seeing is accurate information. If I was in his place, I would probably mostly do the same thing (lean towards the operators) in most cases.

There are times at which @holydarkness slightly takes casinos' side too soon, but that only presents the problem to the people who actually has something to hide. From my side, even though he had seen evidence proving otherwise, and his findings are against me, at the end of it, there was no ill intention. He did his job decently (imho), I respected it even though it's not the outcome I'd wanted, but at the end I had low hopes on it from a very beginning. Not because of him, but because I am aware of what BCgame is doing.

Something I never brought on my case is following page: https://bc.game/help/blockdance. If you go through page, it is agreement "valid for players who signed up before April 30 2024", which includes me. When did this page went live? September 14, weeks before first bankruptcy hearing.

Their defense in my case? I was registered before April 30th and Blockdance BV (which is just another shell company) was liable for my winnings. Even though all liabilities said company had up to that date were settled and my $1.5m winnings occured between May and June. Thankfully, they were stupid enough to provide sales agreement to which liability now goes directly to the Cypriot company.

But that's whole other story of me proving their evidence fabrication.

[BenCodie]

The image being portrayed is definitely as though you are attacking him (even if the intention is the opposite).

As for him working as a public relations person for BC Game, it is not true. BC Game is not the only casino that has scam accusations against them and holydarkness has been active in many scam accusation threads about different casinos too. He volunteers a lot of his time trying to resolve cases, at least that should be acknowledged rather than his reputation being called in to question.

Well, the difference would be through my posts and actions. I am not using that feedback to attack hd, I am simply stating that he is acting as their public relations person (which, he is, as he is handling basically all of their scam accusation threads for them in the exact same way as if he were to be employed by them to do so).

I will make my stance a clearer - I find it very hard to believe that a casino can do so much wrongdoing and that the one user on this forum is preventing that casino from being labelled as a scam, because they are essentially handling their cases for them. It is hard to believe that this user has not thought "wow, there are just too many cases, something is not right here" unless they are not some way incentivized to not think about it. It is also hard to believe that someone who had a genuine intention of helping players to not also have the same thought about not just bc.game (despite it being a clearly leading culprit according to the data posted by gh0573d) but also about other casinos.

[gh0573d]

The image being portrayed is definitely as though you are attacking him (even if the intention is the opposite).

As for him working as a public relations person for BC Game, it is not true. BC Game is not the only casino that has scam accusations against them and holydarkness has been active in many scam accusation threads about different casinos too. He volunteers a lot of his time trying to resolve cases, at least that should be acknowledged rather than his reputation being called in to question.

Well, the difference would be through my posts and actions. I am not using that feedback to attack hd, I am simply stating that he is acting as their public relations person (which, he is, as he is handling basically all of their scam accusation threads for them in the exact same way as if he were to be employed by them to do so).

I will make my stance a clearer - I find it very hard to believe that a casino can do so much wrongdoing and that the one user on this forum is preventing that casino from being labelled as a scam, because they are essentially handling their cases for them. It is hard to believe that this user has not thought "wow, there are just too many cases, something is not right here" unless they are not some way incentivized to not think about it. It is also hard to believe that someone who had a genuine intention of helping players to not also have the same thought about not just bc.game (despite it being a clearly leading culprit according to the data posted by gh0573d) but also about other casinos.

I understand your stance and thought the same. But the thing is: BCgame have very "positive" history in solving all the cases and providing various "evidence" of players' wrongdoing is something that he never questioned. Because, at the end, why would they be lying?

As for other players, they became dismissive after they got the public "resolution" thinking they actually did something wrong, it just can't be that every ADR is telling them they did something wrong, yet they "claim" they didn't? They never questioned all of those as they were not sure. I am. And will go through each and every court there is to get my funds, to prove their ill intentions and hopefully by the end of next week, get court seizure approved and get both bc.game and bcgame.com suspended. At that point, their reputation and their intentions won't be questioned anymore. It will be facts.

On the other side, lets look at my case specifically. They want to convince me I actually:

- Created third account
- Self-referred that account to my main one
- While I was having $1m in Vault in my main account
- And jeopardize of getting my funds taken just (according to blurry image) for mere $250 deposit
- While that third account was never in fact banned?

Nah, not going to happen.


small victory!

Just been informed that court has validated our request for asset seizure in case against Fenice Tech Limited (owners of BC game) and has scheduled expedited hearing next Wednesday.

If approved, both domains bc.game and bcgame.com will be suspended after such request is approved. Including all of their assets in Cyprus.

[gh0573d]

We just received a notification from Curacao that BC.game operators did try to lift the bankruptcy ruling off of Small House BV and/or Blockdance BV through their lawfirm - Ox-Law.

Sorry folks, not going to happen. I'd suggest you watch out closely on future developments

[gh0573d]

I don't need to talk more, they already proven to be actual scammers by trying to avoid outcome of legal decisions in both Cyprus and Curacao in regards to asset seizure/recovery by trying to change domain ownership and switching registrars:



Thankfully, both court and registrars are aware of such behavior and this just developed further into criminal activities (as there are already such about to be filed in Cyprus).

[AdrianLost10BTC]

Hi! To all!

I want to destroy BC.game.
This week I lost 4 BTC there.
No KYC, no verification of funds. 100% manipulation.

Let's unite efforts to get this bitch. Share with me the address of its founders and office!

I have decided to share my story. Next week I will upload a video on YouTube.
Now my X page.

https://x.com/AdrianLost10BTC

Let's make a class action against bc.game

[AdrianLost10BTC]

The image being portrayed is definitely as though you are attacking him (even if the intention is the opposite).

As for him working as a public relations person for BC Game, it is not true. BC Game is not the only casino that has scam accusations against them and holydarkness has been active in many scam accusation threads about different casinos too. He volunteers a lot of his time trying to resolve cases, at least that should be acknowledged rather than his reputation being called in to question.

Well, the difference would be through my posts and actions. I am not using that feedback to attack hd, I am simply stating that he is acting as their public relations person (which, he is, as he is handling basically all of their scam accusation threads for them in the exact same way as if he were to be employed by them to do so).

I will make my stance a clearer - I find it very hard to believe that a casino can do so much wrongdoing and that the one user on this forum is preventing that casino from being labelled as a scam, because they are essentially handling their cases for them. It is hard to believe that this user has not thought "wow, there are just too many cases, something is not right here" unless they are not some way incentivized to not think about it. It is also hard to believe that someone who had a genuine intention of helping players to not also have the same thought about not just bc.game (despite it being a clearly leading culprit according to the data posted by gh0573d) but also about other casinos.

I understand your stance and thought the same. But the thing is: BCgame have very "positive" history in solving all the cases and providing various "evidence" of players' wrongdoing is something that he never questioned. Because, at the end, why would they be lying?

As for other players, they became dismissive after they got the public "resolution" thinking they actually did something wrong, it just can't be that every ADR is telling them they did something wrong, yet they "claim" they didn't? They never questioned all of those as they were not sure. I am. And will go through each and every court there is to get my funds, to prove their ill intentions and hopefully by the end of next week, get court seizure approved and get both bc.game and bcgame.com suspended. At that point, their reputation and their intentions won't be questioned anymore. It will be facts.

On the other side, lets look at my case specifically. They want to convince me I actually:

- Created third account
- Self-referred that account to my main one
- While I was having $1m in Vault in my main account
- And jeopardize of getting my funds taken just (according to blurry image) for mere $250 deposit
- While that third account was never in fact banned?

Nah, not going to happen.


small victory!

Just been informed that court has validated our request for asset seizure in case against Fenice Tech Limited (owners of BC game) and has scheduled expedited hearing next Wednesday.

If approved, both domains bc.game and bcgame.com will be suspended after such request is approved. Including all of their assets in Cyprus.

Share please more info about this lawsuit. I want to join it.