Bitcoin Forum

Other => Off-topic => Topic started by: williamj2543 on July 29, 2014, 03:12:08 AM



Title: Lawyers
Post by: williamj2543 on July 29, 2014, 03:12:08 AM
I wondered how you guys though about lawyers. I'm not trying to offend anyone, but I find that the whole idea of lawyers is bad. Chances are if you have a better lawyer, you have a much better chance of winning, even if you are in the wrong. For example, if you are a criminal, you murder someone, your obviously guilty, but if you have the best lawyer, he/she could twist everything and get you out of it. What do you guys think?


Title: Re: Lawyers
Post by: u9y42 on July 29, 2014, 04:13:55 AM
I wondered how you guys though about lawyers. I'm not trying to offend anyone, but I find that the whole idea of lawyers is bad. Chances are if you have a better lawyer, you have a much better chance of winning, even if you are in the wrong. For example, if you are a criminal, you murder someone, your obviously guilty, but if you have the best lawyer, he/she could twist everything and get you out of it. What do you guys think?

Sure, and not only that, but the current justice system is largely "pay to win"; examples are easy to find, but I'm reminded of the "affluenza case" that hit the news some months ago: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=453647.0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=453647.0). But in the end, you still need to either have someone/a group of people represent you, or a massive restructuring of the entire system, so that representation becomes unnecessary. So, what would you propose as a viable alternative?


Title: Re: Lawyers
Post by: dumbdragon on July 29, 2014, 04:26:48 AM
dude i seriously hate every lawyer and law maker.

Normal rate for a lawyer = $500 per hr.


Title: Re: Lawyers
Post by: 1Referee on July 29, 2014, 12:09:15 PM
It's not different from antything else in life. Want good lawyer, you need to pay good money. The more you can afford to pay, the better protection you will get.



Title: Re: Lawyers
Post by: DrG on July 29, 2014, 12:17:53 PM
For most of us a lawyer is a scum sucking leech and we couldn't feel anything if we saw one get hit by a car (since then 2 more would show up like cockroaches).  It's when you get in trouble that a lawyer may sadly become your best friend.


Title: Re: Lawyers
Post by: pawel7777 on July 29, 2014, 12:55:34 PM
I wondered how you guys though about lawyers. I'm not trying to offend anyone, but I find that the whole idea of lawyers is bad. Chances are if you have a better lawyer, you have a much better chance of winning, even if you are in the wrong. For example, if you are a criminal, you murder someone, your obviously guilty, but if you have the best lawyer, he/she could twist everything and get you out of it. What do you guys think?

Yes, if you're rich you're less likely to go to jail. But who's really to blame? Expensive lawyers? Or the judge/jury, after all, they decide whether guilty or not and what the punishment would be.
The other problem is that poor people don't get the proper representation, they're often advised or pushed to confess even if not guilty.


Title: Re: Lawyers
Post by: u9y42 on July 29, 2014, 01:03:15 PM
I wondered how you guys though about lawyers. I'm not trying to offend anyone, but I find that the whole idea of lawyers is bad. Chances are if you have a better lawyer, you have a much better chance of winning, even if you are in the wrong. For example, if you are a criminal, you murder someone, your obviously guilty, but if you have the best lawyer, he/she could twist everything and get you out of it. What do you guys think?

Yes, if you're rich you're less likely to go to jail. But who's really to blame? Expensive lawyers? Or the judge/jury, after all, they decide whether guilty or not and what the punishment would be.
The other problem is that poor people don't get the proper representation, they're often advised or pushed to confess even if not guilty.

Well, the jury will decide upon the verdict, but in no small part based upon how the situation is presented to them - and obviously, a good (expensive) lawyer will be adept at twisting the narrative to suit his needs. On the other hand, it seems naive to blame the lawyers without presenting a viable alternative; they are doing a necessary job after all, at least until a better system is in place.


Title: Re: Lawyers
Post by: Skrillex on July 29, 2014, 01:37:39 PM
Well unfortunately you need a good one because most of the time you can understand shit about legal terms :(


Title: Re: Lawyers
Post by: Lethn on July 29, 2014, 01:46:20 PM
It's not different from antything else in life. Want good lawyer, you need to pay good money. The more you can afford to pay, the better protection you will get.



Even as an Anarchist/Libertarian I know this is true but I find it pretty disgusting that our entire judiciary system is based on how rich you are jury's and judges are suppose to be impartial but it's obvious depending on the country that impartiality isn't practised in the slightest.

I think the worst examples by far have to be self-defence cases, I have nothing against lawyers themselves, just the system, they're simply a human reflection of the whole corruption that is going on.


Title: Re: Lawyers
Post by: bluefirecorp on July 29, 2014, 02:06:49 PM
dude i seriously hate every lawyer and law maker.

Normal rate for a lawyer = $500 per hr.
dude i seriously hate every surgeon and doctor.

Normal rate for a surgeon  = $10,000 per hr.


Title: Re: Lawyers
Post by: BitcoinMillionaire on July 29, 2014, 03:13:51 PM
I wondered how you guys though about lawyers. I'm not trying to offend anyone, but I find that the whole idea of lawyers is bad. Chances are if you have a better lawyer, you have a much better chance of winning, even if you are in the wrong. For example, if you are a criminal, you murder someone, your obviously guilty, but if you have the best lawyer, he/she could twist everything and get you out of it. What do you guys think?

Maaaan, you got some hate going on there! I mean, lawyers can get you out of some pretty freaky crap! Seriously! Those judges are nothing to mess with and they know their game and get the best outcome for you!


Title: Re: Lawyers
Post by: spazzdla on July 29, 2014, 03:49:41 PM
For most of us a lawyer is a scum sucking leech and we couldn't feel anything if we saw one get hit by a car (since then 2 more would show up like cockroaches).  It's when you get in trouble that a lawyer may sadly become your best friend.

For a insane cost... so not really.


Title: Re: Lawyers
Post by: williamj2543 on July 29, 2014, 05:21:46 PM
I just find that our justice system is corrupted, because even if you are clearly guilty, a good lawyer can give to a chance to win. I think that lawyers should be eliminated because it just imbalances the justice system.


Title: Re: Lawyers
Post by: ibittunes on July 29, 2014, 07:54:05 PM
Isn't there a saying about what to do with all lawyers and judges after a revolution

haha


Title: Re: Lawyers
Post by: leex1528 on July 29, 2014, 07:56:38 PM
most of the problems today in America at least would be solved if there were no lawyers.  unfortunately it started off as a great respectable job, then much like a lot of stuff the more money that was threw at it, the more and more scum started working on getting law degrees. 

I think we removed lawyers from this country it would be a great day for everyone!


Title: Re: Lawyers
Post by: Lauda on July 29, 2014, 07:57:27 PM
dude i seriously hate every lawyer and law maker.

Normal rate for a lawyer = $500 per hr.
dude i seriously hate every surgeon and doctor.

Normal rate for a surgeon  = $10,000 per hr.
People just don't get it. You can't expect lawyers to have same, similar or even only a bit higher wage than a waiter or some other lower end job.
Surgeons definitely deserve that payment if not more.


Title: Re: Lawyers
Post by: Gimmelfarb on July 29, 2014, 08:00:30 PM
you can't really blame lawyers for the existence of lawyers. as long as society is built such that government authority is founded on laws, lawyers play a necessary role, and there is clear incentive for people to train to become lawyers.


Title: Re: Lawyers
Post by: leex1528 on July 29, 2014, 08:02:19 PM
you can't really blame lawyers for the existence of lawyers. as long as society is built such that government authority is founded on laws, lawyers play a necessary role, and there is clear incentive for people to train to become lawyers.

You can however blame lawyers for not being morale and decent citizens and crazed money lunatics.  That is my beef with them, they don't even see a side of the story, they view people as walking paychecks and it is sickening.


Title: Re: Lawyers
Post by: Gimmelfarb on July 29, 2014, 08:02:58 PM
most of the problems today in America at least would be solved if there were no lawyers.  unfortunately it started off as a great respectable job, then much like a lot of stuff the more money that was threw at it, the more and more scum started working on getting law degrees. 

I think we removed lawyers from this country it would be a great day for everyone!

the bigger problems lie in the convoluted nature of the legal system. the more complex and contradictory our laws become, the need for proper academic training for lawyers, and an abundance of lawyers to defend the economic viability of businesses, becomes more necessary.


Title: Re: Lawyers
Post by: Gimmelfarb on July 29, 2014, 08:06:35 PM
you can't really blame lawyers for the existence of lawyers. as long as society is built such that government authority is founded on laws, lawyers play a necessary role, and there is clear incentive for people to train to become lawyers.

You can however blame lawyers for not being morale and decent citizens and crazed money lunatics.  That is my beef with them, they don't even see a side of the story, they view people as walking paychecks and it is sickening.

that's the perverse nature of government authority and the law, and the system it creates. you can't claim that lawyers as a whole are immoral -- that's false on it's face. surely, the system is morally bankrupt, but the issue goes far beyond individuals. it creates incentive for people/business to use the law for their benefit (and at the expense of others), and in turn creates the economic incentive for people to pursue legal careers as a result.


Title: Re: Lawyers
Post by: leex1528 on July 29, 2014, 08:17:54 PM
the bigger problems lie in the convoluted nature of the legal system. the more complex and contradictory our laws become, the need for proper academic training for lawyers, and an abundance of lawyers to defend the economic viability of businesses, becomes more necessary.

The problem though is the whole system is supposedly be about Morales and Truth.  Then they make these idiotic laws(yes that is not the lawyers)  that can be twisted around into a Guilty person getting away with something.  That is what I am finding wrong with lawyers.

that's the perverse nature of government authority and the law, and the system it creates. you can't claim that lawyers as a whole are immoral -- that's false on it's face. surely, the system is morally bankrupt, but the issue goes far beyond individuals. it creates incentive for people/business to use the law for their benefit (and at the expense of others), and in turn creates the economic incentive for people to pursue legal careers as a result.

I am sure there are moral lawyers out there.  But answer me this, do you think there are more greedy ones than moral?  Not many other professions have that linked to it...


Title: Re: Lawyers
Post by: DrG on July 30, 2014, 10:18:04 AM
dude i seriously hate every lawyer and law maker.

Normal rate for a lawyer = $500 per hr.
dude i seriously hate every surgeon and doctor.

Normal rate for a surgeon  = $10,000 per hr.

Are those US Dollars?  Is so, where the hell is this?

I do internal medicine and I'm probably quitting this year because I can make more money doing photography or IT support than I currently get with medicine - more than 1/2 my patients don't even pay their bills.

No surgeon is making $10K/hr - the hospital is charging you $10K an hour.  A wealthy neurosurgeon might make $2 mil a year busting his ass off for 80-90hrs/wk plus call - that doesn't translate into $10k/hr


Title: Re: Lawyers
Post by: squall1066 on July 30, 2014, 10:53:36 AM
Well, Lawyers and bitcoin don't mix, Bitcoin is about standing away from statutes and acts and other government made up crimes, Designed to squeeze every bit of money back into their pockets, Weather you win or loose, The money goes to the courts.

I am currently studying "freeman law" or "laymen's law" It's scary how much control we have over our selves.

On a side note, There was a story in the UK of a robber, Who tried to gain access to a house by climbing on a glass conservatory, The glass gave way and he fell onto a table with a cheese knife cutting his arm.........The robber sued and WON £10K in damages!!

This is the real world we live in with lawyers.



Title: Re: Lawyers
Post by: u9y42 on July 30, 2014, 10:55:37 AM
dude i seriously hate every lawyer and law maker.

Normal rate for a lawyer = $500 per hr.
dude i seriously hate every surgeon and doctor.

Normal rate for a surgeon  = $10,000 per hr.

Are those US Dollars?  Is so, where the hell is this?

I do internal medicine and I'm probably quitting this year because I can make more money doing photography or IT support than I currently get with medicine - more than 1/2 my patients don't even pay their bills.

No surgeon is making $10K/hr - the hospital is charging you $10K an hour.  A wealthy neurosurgeon might make $2 mil a year busting his ass off for 80-90hrs/wk plus call - that doesn't translate into $10k/hr

I don't think that was his point - he could have said they made $1000 or $1000000 per hour. He was criticizing dumbdragon for judging lawyers merely based on their pay rate, without any further considerations. Besides, nobody really hates doctors/surgeons (I think :)).


Title: Re: Lawyers
Post by: murraypaul on July 30, 2014, 11:21:48 AM
On a side note, There was a story in the UK of a robber, Who tried to gain access to a house by climbing on a glass conservatory, The glass gave way and he fell onto a table with a cheese knife cutting his arm.........The robber sued and WON £10K in damages!!

Evidence for this?

Edit: This particular fable seems to have been circulating for around 30 years.

http://www.tortdeform.com/archives/2006/09/book_review_a_tort_protectors.html
Quote
There is the famous story of the burglar who falls through the skylight, falls on a knife and sues the homeowners for leaving the knife out. The actual case involved a teenager who was on the roof of a school and, by the best accounts we can find, was trying to redirect a light because they were trying to play basketball. And while he was on the roof he stepped through the skylight, which had been painted over black. So this may have been a trespasser, but it wasn't a burglar.

Secondly, the incident took place in a school and not a private home. And there had been a previous claim where someone else had stepped through one of these skylights that had been painted black, which made them invisible. So the school knew about it, which was an important part of the case. And there was no knife. So that's an example of the way a story bears some resemblance to the actual events. (The teenager was rendered quadriplegic in the accident and ended up settling with the school.)

You probably saw it in the movie Liar, Liar:
Quote
This is a quote of Liar Liar w/ Jim Carrey (Jim is Fletcher)
Greta: Mr. Reede, several years ago a friend of mine had a burglar on her roof, a burglar. He fell through the kitchen skylight, landed on a cutting board, on a butcher's knife, cutting his leg. The burglar sued my friend, he sued my friend. And because of guys like you *he won*. My friend had to pay the burglar $6,000. Is that justice?
Fletcher: No!
[Greta looks pleased, but then Fletcher continues]
Fletcher: I'd have got him ten.
[Greta stalks off, appalled]

Quote
The movie “Liar Liar” recycled the yarn about the burglar who fell through a skylight and sued the homeowner over his injuries. This widely circulated legend originated in Redding, Calif. A 19-year-old went on the roof of the high school where he had graduated. He fell through a skylight that had been painted over and was left a quadriplegic. After another student had previously fallen through a painted-over skylight at a nearby school, the Redding school contracted with a local concern to board over the skylight to prevent such accidents. Because the Redding school knew of the danger for months without getting the skylight fixed, the school settled with the youth. When President Reagan lamented that a jury had awarded the money to a burglar, he invented the jury and treated a trespasser as a burglar.


Title: Re: Lawyers
Post by: newflesh on July 30, 2014, 11:33:12 AM
Depends on the type of lawyer in my opinion. Human rights lawyers I see as generally positive...but then you have the parasites who defend war criminals / corporations etc. Don't think you can tar them all with the same brush.


Title: Re: Lawyers
Post by: squall1066 on July 30, 2014, 11:43:45 AM


You probably saw it in the movie Liar, Liar:
Quote
This is a quote of Liar Liar w/ Jim Carrey (Jim is Fletcher)
Greta: Mr. Reede, several years ago a friend of mine had a burglar on her roof, a burglar. He fell through the kitchen skylight, landed on a cutting board, on a butcher's knife, cutting his leg. The burglar sued my friend, he sued my friend. And because of guys like you *he won*. My friend had to pay the burglar $6,000. Is that justice?
Fletcher: No!
[Greta looks pleased, but then Fletcher continues]
Fletcher: I'd have got him ten.
[Greta stalks off, appalled]


It was a short article in the papers quite a few years ago, It was not a kitchen sky-lite, It was a conservatory, It was not his leg, It was his arm, It was not a butchers knife, It was a cheese knife.

Having a quick scour of the net, I see lots of UK law blunders, But not this one, I am sure I did not imagine it  ;D Anyone else from the UK remember this one?


Title: Re: Lawyers
Post by: dKingston on July 30, 2014, 11:49:50 AM
What is the alternative your to lawyers? Do you like kangaroo courts?


Title: Re: Lawyers
Post by: murraypaul on July 30, 2014, 11:54:18 AM
It was a short article in the papers quite a few years ago, It was not a kitchen sky-lite, It was a conservatory, It was not his leg, It was his arm, It was not a butchers knife, It was a cheese knife.

Exactly the sort of things which get mutated as urban legends spread.


Title: Re: Lawyers
Post by: leex1528 on July 30, 2014, 04:35:27 PM
What is the alternative your to lawyers? Do you like kangaroo courts?


Why not have both parties involved tell their side of the story, and the jury makes a decision based on what they said? 


Title: Re: Lawyers
Post by: bluefirecorp on July 30, 2014, 04:38:21 PM
What is the alternative your to lawyers? Do you like kangaroo courts?


Why not have both parties involved tell their side of the story, and the jury makes a decision based on what they said? 

What about third party witnesses? And the order of said witnesses?


Title: Re: Lawyers
Post by: leex1528 on July 30, 2014, 04:40:56 PM

What about third party witnesses? And the order of said witnesses?

Well if both parties tell their side of the story, and a 3rd party witnessed the event in question....or anything, call them up.

I don't think we need lawyers at all. 


Title: Re: Lawyers
Post by: bluefirecorp on July 30, 2014, 04:48:54 PM

What about third party witnesses? And the order of said witnesses?

Well if both parties tell their side of the story, and a 3rd party witnessed the event in question....or anything, call them up.

I don't think we need lawyers at all. 

What about a murder or something similar? We only have one side of the story vs the police investigator which are technically a 3rd party?

Your whole "not having legal representation" idealism is failing by the second.


Title: Re: Lawyers
Post by: leex1528 on July 30, 2014, 04:51:27 PM

What about a murder or something similar? We only have one side of the story vs the police investigator which are technically a 3rd party?

Your whole "not having legal representation" idealism is failing by the second.

So why not have the police investigator represent the murder victim?  Don't see anything wrong with that...

The alternative is for lawyers to actually get paid a flat rate per case no matter what or become morale human beings.


Title: Re: Lawyers
Post by: bluefirecorp on July 30, 2014, 05:02:32 PM

What about a murder or something similar? We only have one side of the story vs the police investigator which are technically a 3rd party?

Your whole "not having legal representation" idealism is failing by the second.

So why not have the police investigator represent the murder victim?  Don't see anything wrong with that...

The alternative is for lawyers to actually get paid a flat rate per case no matter what or become morale human beings.

Right, because lawyers wouldn't take simple cases to finish a bunch of cases really quickly.

Lawyers exist for a reason just like laws exist. There's a lot of laws, and they're confusing. There's a reason they're confusing.


Title: Re: Lawyers
Post by: Baitty on July 30, 2014, 05:04:13 PM
Lawyers are needed they know enough to try and protect their client.


Title: Re: Lawyers
Post by: leex1528 on July 30, 2014, 05:29:42 PM

Right, because lawyers wouldn't take simple cases to finish a bunch of cases really quickly.

Lawyers exist for a reason just like laws exist. There's a lot of laws, and they're confusing. There's a reason they're confusing.

You honestly can't tell me the world wouldn't be a better place today if there were no lawyers.  People are constantly getting in lawsuits because they are trying to get rich.  Lawyers gladly take the case and sometimes they win. 

Just some of the cases that make you sick

Lady spills coffee on self, gets 5 million dollars

Judge gets angry at a mom and pop dry cleaning store, sues them for 67 million because their sign said "Satisfaction guaranteed"  Mom and Pop lose 2 of there stores in order to pay for the defense-this shouldn't have ever gone to court, but lawyers do crazy things

A guy named Mark Guthrie gets sued by the company he works for because they made a salary error in his favor, and he didn't want to pay taxes on their error.

Boys trespass on private property, get burned by a wire, win 24 million dollars

These are just some of the crazy cases that should never have happened, but.....Lawyers!


Title: Re: Lawyers
Post by: williamj2543 on July 30, 2014, 05:48:44 PM

Right, because lawyers wouldn't take simple cases to finish a bunch of cases really quickly.

Lawyers exist for a reason just like laws exist. There's a lot of laws, and they're confusing. There's a reason they're confusing.

You honestly can't tell me the world wouldn't be a better place today if there were no lawyers.  People are constantly getting in lawsuits because they are trying to get rich.  Lawyers gladly take the case and sometimes they win. 

Just some of the cases that make you sick

Lady spills coffee on self, gets 5 million dollars

Judge gets angry at a mom and pop dry cleaning store, sues them for 67 million because their sign said "Satisfaction guaranteed"  Mom and Pop lose 2 of there stores in order to pay for the defense-this shouldn't have ever gone to court, but lawyers do crazy things

A guy named Mark Guthrie gets sued by the company he works for because they made a salary error in his favor, and he didn't want to pay taxes on their error.

Boys trespass on private property, get burned by a wire, win 24 million dollars

These are just some of the crazy cases that should never have happened, but.....Lawyers!
Exactly, lawyers just twist it to have a chance of the guilty person, to become innocent, even though the guilty person is obviously guilty, the lawyers will find loopholes to make the bad people win  :(


Title: Re: Lawyers
Post by: u9y42 on July 30, 2014, 10:21:44 PM

Right, because lawyers wouldn't take simple cases to finish a bunch of cases really quickly.

Lawyers exist for a reason just like laws exist. There's a lot of laws, and they're confusing. There's a reason they're confusing.

You honestly can't tell me the world wouldn't be a better place today if there were no lawyers.  People are constantly getting in lawsuits because they are trying to get rich.  Lawyers gladly take the case and sometimes they win.  

Just some of the cases that make you sick

Lady spills coffee on self, gets 5 million dollars

Judge gets angry at a mom and pop dry cleaning store, sues them for 67 million because their sign said "Satisfaction guaranteed"  Mom and Pop lose 2 of there stores in order to pay for the defense-this shouldn't have ever gone to court, but lawyers do crazy things

A guy named Mark Guthrie gets sued by the company he works for because they made a salary error in his favor, and he didn't want to pay taxes on their error.

Boys trespass on private property, get burned by a wire, win 24 million dollars

These are just some of the crazy cases that should never have happened, but.....Lawyers!

Not to address your larger point, but if the "coffee case" you mentioned was the following, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liebeck_v._McDonald%27s_Restaurants (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liebeck_v._McDonald%27s_Restaurants), the lady actually got third degree burns from that, and had to be hospitalized for a week. And the final amount she was awarded ended up being less than $600000. :P


Title: Re: Lawyers
Post by: Candystripes on July 30, 2014, 10:26:29 PM
Lawyers are some of the worst people I know. I wish there was no such thing as lawyers in this world.


Title: Re: Lawyers
Post by: leex1528 on July 30, 2014, 11:51:57 PM

Not to address your larger point, but if the "coffee case" you mentioned was the following, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liebeck_v._McDonald%27s_Restaurants (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liebeck_v._McDonald%27s_Restaurants), the lady actually got third degree burns from that, and had to be hospitalized for a week. And the final amount she was awarded ended up being less than $600000. :P

Still she should have got 0 dollars.  Everyone knows Coffee is hot, when you see that steam coming off it, when you taste it...Obviously its hot...

If I go to a restaurant and touch a fire, can I sue them for 3rd degree burns, it didn't say caution, fire is hot anywhere?


Title: Re: Lawyers
Post by: DrG on July 31, 2014, 07:04:52 AM

Not to address your larger point, but if the "coffee case" you mentioned was the following, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liebeck_v._McDonald%27s_Restaurants (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liebeck_v._McDonald%27s_Restaurants), the lady actually got third degree burns from that, and had to be hospitalized for a week. And the final amount she was awarded ended up being less than $600000. :P

Still she should have got 0 dollars.  Everyone knows Coffee is hot, when you see that steam coming off it, when you taste it...Obviously its hot...

If I go to a restaurant and touch a fire, can I sue them for 3rd degree burns, it didn't say caution, fire is hot anywhere?

Actually you could sue and that's why businesses have to have umbrella coverage.  People will run in from the rain, shake their umbrella on the floor, slip and sue.

I have umbrella coverage for my house because I have a nice granite and marble walkway to the front door.  If somebody slips on that while trying to leave some solicitation on my door I can and probably will get sued.  Is it ethical and moral - not in my book.  But the lawyer would say "clearly the homeowner should have known better than to make such an inviting walkway to the front door so hazardous".

Ahh trial lawyers - giving Satan a challenge in the race for the most evil creature


Title: Re: Lawyers
Post by: leex1528 on July 31, 2014, 12:33:17 PM
Actually you could sue and that's why businesses have to have umbrella coverage.  People will run in from the rain, shake their umbrella on the floor, slip and sue.

I have umbrella coverage for my house because I have a nice granite and marble walkway to the front door.  If somebody slips on that while trying to leave some solicitation on my door I can and probably will get sued.  Is it ethical and moral - not in my book.  But the lawyer would say "clearly the homeowner should have known better than to make such an inviting walkway to the front door so hazardous".

Ahh trial lawyers - giving Satan a challenge in the race for the most evil creature

So I didn't even know this, but the Mcdonalds case the coffee cup already said "Caution this is hot" 


I don't think people who are complete morons have the right to sue anyone.   And in my book you are a moron if you spill coffee on yourself and think its someone else's fault the coffee was hot.