|
Title: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: BTCBLOGGER on June 11, 2015, 04:34:00 AM Allegations on me by Quickseller on me I will give all the answer here asked by anyone.
"I was given access to BTCBLOGGER's account and reviewed his PM history with his permission. Here is what I found when reviewing your PM history: I was able to find PM's to/from the two likely scam sites that you have escrowed for. I was able to find a PM to(and from) a single site that rejected your services. Other then the above, I was unable to find any sites/users that you were sending/receiving PM's to/from regarding your signature campaign services. I would consider you proposing your services to various sites to be similar to "cold calling" which generally has a very low "conversation" rate, and an even lower rate when you actually make contact with your potential customers. However you were able to sell your services to 66% of your prospects and made contact with 100% of your prospects. Additionally, what you were doing would likely be considered to be PM spam and as a result would likely be something that would have resulted in a ban if such PM's were reported, which is something that does not appear to have happened. Additionally, you were able to get someone to trust you with their money after you received a negative trust rating from someone in the Default Trust network, and had a 'trade with extreme caution tag' which is highly suspicious. I would say that the PM evidence is inclusive at best, however the evidence suggesting that you are the same person as the ponzi scams you are "escrowing" for are undebunked." Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: BTCBLOGGER on June 11, 2015, 04:51:05 AM Service is Rejected by this site
Hello, Its BTCBLOGGER, I usually offer Campaign management for signature campaigns. Makes thread Look attractive with some customization. Enroll people in the campaign and makes a New spreadsheet for them to record their each and every activity according to the campaign requirement. Finds possible spam by going through a review of each and every member. Checks whether the person is fulfilling the campaign requirement or Not. and many more thing which are needed to Run a campaign easily without any problem. Charges are very Low you can offer me any amount you Think reasonable. Let me Know if you wants to hire me Go away ponzi promoter! Everything you have said you can do is already done and to a higher standard than you could possibly do. Bye Only one because all the other are deleted by me i deleted nearly 3 Pages which have the logs of chat. "I was unable to find any sites/users that you were sending/receiving PM's to/from regarding your signature campaign services." As i said all the logs are deleted Here are the member whom i sent the message to provide my services you ask them. Cloudthink.io (mirjangka) PCinvest multicryptos luckyballs and some more don't remember I think may be Nascasino is also one. "I was able to find PM's to/from the two likely scam sites that you have escrowed for" !!! WARNING: This user is a newbie. If you are expecting a message from a more veteran member, then this is an imposter !!! !!! WARNING: This user is a newbie. If you are expecting a message from a more veteran member, then this is an imposter !!! Got payments!!! WARNING: This user is a newbie. If you are expecting a message from a more veteran member, then this is an imposter !!! 1ACggpLdFH9twhePpTvLwacCYh93taQZMiK i think no one will give it a chance but I can do the escrow for this and also willing to manage the campaign for only 0.025 per week or 0.1 per month and also wanted to keep your signature in my space for same rates as you are offering to others if you are ready please pm me Great! We are ready to pay. K then here is my address. https://blockchain.info/tx/4f913c13bbef1e41fb7a8b7e4f187f6956ca762f7bd349e16a0b7886eff63a1e 0.5+0.025 K can I make a new thread or just use your please let me know You can use our topic I have sent 0.6 BTC for campaign to 1G4XVzKebjE361y5uWiG82Wpc2NzA5YSvu What do you mean "0.13 previous pending for signature design + all my fee here"? I have sent to your address 0.07 BTC. Should I send you more? +0.13 btc or +0.06 btc? Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: Quickseller on June 11, 2015, 05:19:29 AM Like I said in my PM to you, and in my neutral trust rating, the evidence in your PM history is inclusive and I do not think it disproves the fact that it appears as if you are running various ponzi sites via potential alts.
You already had a negative trust rating from dooglus when SNavy had agreed to use you to escrow/run their signature campaign. I do not think I have ever seen anyone accept escrow from someone when the person offering their escrow services had an overall negative trust rating. Not only that, but I did not see any kind of conversation between you and SNavy regarding the negative rating, which is something that I would expect to happen. According to your above post, you did not receive a response and/or were rejected when you proposed running a signature campaign on behalf of 4 other companies, plus one more that I found in your PM history would make five. That means that 2 out of 7 sites agreed to use your services, which works out to a ~14% conversation rate, which IMO is extremely high for what is effectively cold calling, and the proposal you wrote was effectively an initial pitch to get their attention, not a more detailed sales pitch once they responded. I am also not the only one who believes that you are running the two likely scam sites whose signature campaigns you are running. You have received negative trust ratings from a number of other people, and several people in your various threads have accused you of running the sites you are escrowing for. I hope you can understand how a reasonable person can come to the same conclusion that I did with the facts that were available to me (and available to the public). Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: BTCBLOGGER on June 11, 2015, 05:46:01 AM Like I said in my PM to you, and in my neutral trust rating, the evidence in your PM history is inclusive and I do not think it disproves the fact that it appears as if you are running various ponzi sites via potential alts. I'm running with the money now and will return the money to the owner only if Quickseller remove his trust rating from my account and apologies for his big mistake and agree not to make this kind of mistake again in future I'm also wrong about my perception that he is a genius in finding alt account i wants let everyone know he just neglect the fact available and accept the fact that are not available to judge alt account. I don't think his rating can be taken as trusted.You already had a negative trust rating from dooglus when SNavy had agreed to use you to escrow/run their signature campaign. I do not think I have ever seen anyone accept escrow from someone when the person offering their escrow services had an overall negative trust rating. Not only that, but I did not see any kind of conversation between you and SNavy regarding the negative rating, which is something that I would expect to happen. According to your above post, you did not receive a response and/or were rejected when you proposed running a signature campaign on behalf of 4 other companies, plus one more that I found in your PM history would make five. That means that 2 out of 7 sites agreed to use your services, which works out to a ~14% conversation rate, which IMO is extremely high for what is effectively cold calling, and the proposal you wrote was effectively an initial pitch to get their attention, not a more detailed sales pitch once they responded. I am also not the only one who believes that you are running the two likely scam sites whose signature campaigns you are running. You have received negative trust ratings from a number of other people, and several people in your various threads have accused you of running the sites you are escrowing for. I hope you can understand how a reasonable person can come to the same conclusion that I did with the facts that were available to me (and available to the public). Only Quickseller knows the password of this account and he was solely responsible for any hack on this account. Quickseller looks very confident about his allegation what if it is found that i'm not snavy or any other alt which is posting in investor based game is not mine will he pay the 0.7 BTC of Snavy. Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: Quickseller on June 11, 2015, 05:50:30 AM Like I said in my PM to you, and in my neutral trust rating, the evidence in your PM history is inclusive and I do not think it disproves the fact that it appears as if you are running various ponzi sites via potential alts. I'm running with the money now and will return the money to the owner only if Quickseller remove his trust rating from my account and apologies for his big mistake and agree not to make this kind of mistake again in future I'm also wrong about my perception that he is a genius in finding alt account i wants let everyone know he just neglect the fact available and accept the fact that are not available to judge alt account. I don't think his rating can be taken as trusted.You already had a negative trust rating from dooglus when SNavy had agreed to use you to escrow/run their signature campaign. I do not think I have ever seen anyone accept escrow from someone when the person offering their escrow services had an overall negative trust rating. Not only that, but I did not see any kind of conversation between you and SNavy regarding the negative rating, which is something that I would expect to happen. According to your above post, you did not receive a response and/or were rejected when you proposed running a signature campaign on behalf of 4 other companies, plus one more that I found in your PM history would make five. That means that 2 out of 7 sites agreed to use your services, which works out to a ~14% conversation rate, which IMO is extremely high for what is effectively cold calling, and the proposal you wrote was effectively an initial pitch to get their attention, not a more detailed sales pitch once they responded. I am also not the only one who believes that you are running the two likely scam sites whose signature campaigns you are running. You have received negative trust ratings from a number of other people, and several people in your various threads have accused you of running the sites you are escrowing for. I hope you can understand how a reasonable person can come to the same conclusion that I did with the facts that were available to me (and available to the public). Only Quickseller knows the password of this account and he was solely responsible for any hack on this account. Quickseller looks very confident about his allegation what if it is found that i'm not snavy or any other alt which is posting in investor based game is not mine will he pay the 0.7 BTC of Snavy. Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: BTCBLOGGER on June 11, 2015, 06:03:01 AM Like I said in my PM to you, and in my neutral trust rating, the evidence in your PM history is inclusive and I do not think it disproves the fact that it appears as if you are running various ponzi sites via potential alts. I'm running with the money now and will return the money to the owner only if Quickseller remove his trust rating from my account and apologies for his big mistake and agree not to make this kind of mistake again in future I'm also wrong about my perception that he is a genius in finding alt account i wants let everyone know he just neglect the fact available and accept the fact that are not available to judge alt account. I don't think his rating can be taken as trusted.You already had a negative trust rating from dooglus when SNavy had agreed to use you to escrow/run their signature campaign. I do not think I have ever seen anyone accept escrow from someone when the person offering their escrow services had an overall negative trust rating. Not only that, but I did not see any kind of conversation between you and SNavy regarding the negative rating, which is something that I would expect to happen. According to your above post, you did not receive a response and/or were rejected when you proposed running a signature campaign on behalf of 4 other companies, plus one more that I found in your PM history would make five. That means that 2 out of 7 sites agreed to use your services, which works out to a ~14% conversation rate, which IMO is extremely high for what is effectively cold calling, and the proposal you wrote was effectively an initial pitch to get their attention, not a more detailed sales pitch once they responded. I am also not the only one who believes that you are running the two likely scam sites whose signature campaigns you are running. You have received negative trust ratings from a number of other people, and several people in your various threads have accused you of running the sites you are escrowing for. I hope you can understand how a reasonable person can come to the same conclusion that I did with the facts that were available to me (and available to the public). Only Quickseller knows the password of this account and he was solely responsible for any hack on this account. Quickseller looks very confident about his allegation what if it is found that i'm not snavy or any other alt which is posting in investor based game is not mine will he pay the 0.7 BTC of Snavy. Yeah I'm going now and the person is responsible for this is you only you. Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: romano1 on June 11, 2015, 06:20:45 AM I'm running with the money now and will return the money to the owner only if Quickseller remove his trust rating from my account and apologies for his big mistake. If you are threatening to run away with money you were entrusted with if I do not remove negative trust feedback, then that along makes you untrustworthy. Yeah this is really ugly that due to someone else's trust ratings you are eating the money of the owner of a ponzi. You have no right on that money and if you are even thinking of getting those and run away then how can we trust you in future ? Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: BTCBLOGGER on June 11, 2015, 06:27:18 AM I think BTCBLOGGER is not the owner of any ponzi but yeah I want him never in future again to promote any ponzi by encouraging them to run signature campaigns ... QuickSeller is not wrong in his opinion as BTCBLOGGER escrows many campaigns so he might think that he is the owner. I really believe BTCBLOGGER is not the owner, but why are you promoting ponzi man ? I'm running with the money now and will return the money to the owner only if Quickseller remove his trust rating from my account and apologies for his big mistake and agree not to make this kind of mistake again in future I'm also wrong about my perception that he is a genius in finding alt account i wants let everyone know he just neglect the fact available and accept the fact that are not available to judge alt account. I don't think his rating can be taken as trusted. Only Quickseller knows the password of this account and he was solely responsible for any hack on this account. Quickseller looks very confident about his allegation what if it is found that i'm not snavy or any other alt which is posting in investor based game is not mine will he pay the 0.7 BTC of Snavy. Yeah this is really ugly that due to someone else's trust ratings you are eating the money of the owner of a ponzi. You have no right on that money and if you are even thinking of getting those and run away then how can we trust you in future ? [/quote] People are not trusting me right now how can i think that they will trust me in future. Ask quickseller to remove trust rating and apologies for his big mistake and ask Snavy to withraw his campaign i will return all the money to him. Sorry for my rude behavior but people here made me angry by saying bad things to me. Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: XinXan on June 11, 2015, 07:12:39 AM As i said before its really weird that someone would contact you to be escrow for their campaign and so far 2 ponzies have done so. You said you were the one actually contacting them so you are indeed promoting or trying to promote ponzies, i still dont understand why would they accept you as an escrow unless you have something to do with them, there are plenty of good escrows and you never even had green trust.
Also you are participating in the bit mixer sig campaign with red trust, you shouldnt be able since in their rules its clearly specified that you cant participate if you get valid negative trust rating. In a way you could say you are scamming bit mixer. Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: dooglus on June 11, 2015, 01:06:25 PM Like I said in my PM to you, and in my neutral trust rating, the evidence in your PM history is inclusive and I do not think it disproves the fact that it appears as if you are running various ponzi sites via potential alts. I'm running with the money now and will return the money to the owner only if Quickseller remove his trust rating from my account and apologies for his big mistake and agree not to make this kind of mistake again in future I'm also wrong about my perception that he is a genius in finding alt account i wants let everyone know he just neglect the fact available and accept the fact that are not available to judge alt account. I don't think his rating can be taken as trusted.You already had a negative trust rating from dooglus when SNavy had agreed to use you to escrow/run their signature campaign. I do not think I have ever seen anyone accept escrow from someone when the person offering their escrow services had an overall negative trust rating. Not only that, but I did not see any kind of conversation between you and SNavy regarding the negative rating, which is something that I would expect to happen. According to your above post, you did not receive a response and/or were rejected when you proposed running a signature campaign on behalf of 4 other companies, plus one more that I found in your PM history would make five. That means that 2 out of 7 sites agreed to use your services, which works out to a ~14% conversation rate, which IMO is extremely high for what is effectively cold calling, and the proposal you wrote was effectively an initial pitch to get their attention, not a more detailed sales pitch once they responded. I am also not the only one who believes that you are running the two likely scam sites whose signature campaigns you are running. You have received negative trust ratings from a number of other people, and several people in your various threads have accused you of running the sites you are escrowing for. I hope you can understand how a reasonable person can come to the same conclusion that I did with the facts that were available to me (and available to the public). Only Quickseller knows the password of this account and he was solely responsible for any hack on this account. Quickseller looks very confident about his allegation what if it is found that i'm not snavy or any other alt which is posting in investor based game is not mine will he pay the 0.7 BTC of Snavy. Blackmail? Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: BTCBLOGGER on June 11, 2015, 01:54:55 PM Like I said in my PM to you, and in my neutral trust rating, the evidence in your PM history is inclusive and I do not think it disproves the fact that it appears as if you are running various ponzi sites via potential alts. I'm running with the money now and will return the money to the owner only if Quickseller remove his trust rating from my account and apologies for his big mistake and agree not to make this kind of mistake again in future I'm also wrong about my perception that he is a genius in finding alt account i wants let everyone know he just neglect the fact available and accept the fact that are not available to judge alt account. I don't think his rating can be taken as trusted.You already had a negative trust rating from dooglus when SNavy had agreed to use you to escrow/run their signature campaign. I do not think I have ever seen anyone accept escrow from someone when the person offering their escrow services had an overall negative trust rating. Not only that, but I did not see any kind of conversation between you and SNavy regarding the negative rating, which is something that I would expect to happen. According to your above post, you did not receive a response and/or were rejected when you proposed running a signature campaign on behalf of 4 other companies, plus one more that I found in your PM history would make five. That means that 2 out of 7 sites agreed to use your services, which works out to a ~14% conversation rate, which IMO is extremely high for what is effectively cold calling, and the proposal you wrote was effectively an initial pitch to get their attention, not a more detailed sales pitch once they responded. I am also not the only one who believes that you are running the two likely scam sites whose signature campaigns you are running. You have received negative trust ratings from a number of other people, and several people in your various threads have accused you of running the sites you are escrowing for. I hope you can understand how a reasonable person can come to the same conclusion that I did with the facts that were available to me (and available to the public). Only Quickseller knows the password of this account and he was solely responsible for any hack on this account. Quickseller looks very confident about his allegation what if it is found that i'm not snavy or any other alt which is posting in investor based game is not mine will he pay the 0.7 BTC of Snavy. Blackmail? Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: btcton on June 11, 2015, 04:03:36 PM Like I said in my PM to you, and in my neutral trust rating, the evidence in your PM history is inclusive and I do not think it disproves the fact that it appears as if you are running various ponzi sites via potential alts. I'm running with the money now and will return the money to the owner only if Quickseller remove his trust rating from my account and apologies for his big mistake and agree not to make this kind of mistake again in future I'm also wrong about my perception that he is a genius in finding alt account i wants let everyone know he just neglect the fact available and accept the fact that are not available to judge alt account. I don't think his rating can be taken as trusted.You already had a negative trust rating from dooglus when SNavy had agreed to use you to escrow/run their signature campaign. I do not think I have ever seen anyone accept escrow from someone when the person offering their escrow services had an overall negative trust rating. Not only that, but I did not see any kind of conversation between you and SNavy regarding the negative rating, which is something that I would expect to happen. According to your above post, you did not receive a response and/or were rejected when you proposed running a signature campaign on behalf of 4 other companies, plus one more that I found in your PM history would make five. That means that 2 out of 7 sites agreed to use your services, which works out to a ~14% conversation rate, which IMO is extremely high for what is effectively cold calling, and the proposal you wrote was effectively an initial pitch to get their attention, not a more detailed sales pitch once they responded. I am also not the only one who believes that you are running the two likely scam sites whose signature campaigns you are running. You have received negative trust ratings from a number of other people, and several people in your various threads have accused you of running the sites you are escrowing for. I hope you can understand how a reasonable person can come to the same conclusion that I did with the facts that were available to me (and available to the public). Only Quickseller knows the password of this account and he was solely responsible for any hack on this account. Quickseller looks very confident about his allegation what if it is found that i'm not snavy or any other alt which is posting in investor based game is not mine will he pay the 0.7 BTC of Snavy. Blackmail? Looks like blackmail to me. If he is planning to "regain" his trust, he isn't doing a good job about it. I don't see how the two issues here are related like that. Quickseller negtrusting him are no grounds for him to scam the other guy by keeping his money. Then again, the other guy is promoting a ponzi... (That is all considering they are not just the same person) Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: sukamasoto on June 11, 2015, 04:07:06 PM You got negative feedback from Dooglus. About QS's feedback is not affect on default trust except you're put him/her into your trust list.
There's a risk to involve with Ponzi. If you are not promoting CRYPTO-MMM.com earlier, Dooglus will not leave you red-ve Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: the joint on June 11, 2015, 04:12:31 PM Like I said in my PM to you, and in my neutral trust rating, the evidence in your PM history is inclusive and I do not think it disproves the fact that it appears as if you are running various ponzi sites via potential alts. I'm running with the money now and will return the money to the owner only if Quickseller remove his trust rating from my account and apologies for his big mistake and agree not to make this kind of mistake again in future I'm also wrong about my perception that he is a genius in finding alt account i wants let everyone know he just neglect the fact available and accept the fact that are not available to judge alt account. I don't think his rating can be taken as trusted.You already had a negative trust rating from dooglus when SNavy had agreed to use you to escrow/run their signature campaign. I do not think I have ever seen anyone accept escrow from someone when the person offering their escrow services had an overall negative trust rating. Not only that, but I did not see any kind of conversation between you and SNavy regarding the negative rating, which is something that I would expect to happen. According to your above post, you did not receive a response and/or were rejected when you proposed running a signature campaign on behalf of 4 other companies, plus one more that I found in your PM history would make five. That means that 2 out of 7 sites agreed to use your services, which works out to a ~14% conversation rate, which IMO is extremely high for what is effectively cold calling, and the proposal you wrote was effectively an initial pitch to get their attention, not a more detailed sales pitch once they responded. I am also not the only one who believes that you are running the two likely scam sites whose signature campaigns you are running. You have received negative trust ratings from a number of other people, and several people in your various threads have accused you of running the sites you are escrowing for. I hope you can understand how a reasonable person can come to the same conclusion that I did with the facts that were available to me (and available to the public). Only Quickseller knows the password of this account and he was solely responsible for any hack on this account. Quickseller looks very confident about his allegation what if it is found that i'm not snavy or any other alt which is posting in investor based game is not mine will he pay the 0.7 BTC of Snavy. Negative feedback left. Nice blackmail ::) Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: XinXan on June 11, 2015, 04:42:23 PM Well seems like your scam accusation against yourself worked after all, you got more negative red trust. By the way i contacted bit-mixer manager to kick you out of their campaign but he didnt respond yet.
I always knew this guy was shady since my first trust rating i left him, i called it! Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: BTCBLOGGER on June 11, 2015, 04:59:53 PM I am going from here let me know when all the negative trust left in last 24 will be removed by those member who left them.
Email - chauhanmohan35@gmail.com Just a single email will work from Quickseller Only one person is responsible for this Quickseller he has to apologies for his wrong perception. I will return all the funds within 24 hours after getting email from him. Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: KWH on June 11, 2015, 05:05:52 PM I am going from here let me know when all the negative trust left in last 24 will be removed by those member who left them. Email - chauhanmohan35@gmail.com Just a single email will work from Quickseller Only one person is responsible for this Quickseller he has to apologies for his wrong perception. I will return all the funds within 24 hours after getting email from him. Yep, this is really going to help you. ::) Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: BTCBLOGGER on June 11, 2015, 05:10:25 PM I am going from here let me know when all the negative trust left in last 24 will be removed by those member who left them. Email - chauhanmohan35@gmail.com Just a single email will work from Quickseller Only one person is responsible for this Quickseller he has to apologies for his wrong perception. I will return all the funds within 24 hours after getting email from him. Yep, this is really going to help you. ::) Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: KWH on June 11, 2015, 05:11:42 PM I am going from here let me know when all the negative trust left in last 24 will be removed by those member who left them. Email - chauhanmohan35@gmail.com Just a single email will work from Quickseller Only one person is responsible for this Quickseller he has to apologies for his wrong perception. I will return all the funds within 24 hours after getting email from him. Yep, this is really going to help you. ::) You did it to yourself, leave yourself appropriate thanks. Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: BTCBLOGGER on June 11, 2015, 05:16:14 PM I am going from here let me know when all the negative trust left in last 24 will be removed by those member who left them. Email - chauhanmohan35@gmail.com Just a single email will work from Quickseller Only one person is responsible for this Quickseller he has to apologies for his wrong perception. I will return all the funds within 24 hours after getting email from him. Yep, this is really going to help you. ::) You did it to yourself, leave yourself appropriate thanks. Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: letyouearn on June 11, 2015, 05:16:45 PM I am going from here let me know when all the negative trust left in last 24 will be removed by those member who left them. Email - chauhanmohan35@gmail.com Just a single email will work from Quickseller Only one person is responsible for this Quickseller he has to apologies for his wrong perception. I will return all the funds within 24 hours after getting email from him. Yep, this is really going to help you. ::) All funds are just moved to another wallet what he is holding for signature campaign. Transaction id = https://blockchain.info/tx/0e34eebd0fc68a862e69c0f96d6cdab727cd368afa58a5ecc62c1ad5fb4af57d Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: KWH on June 11, 2015, 05:18:44 PM I am going from here let me know when all the negative trust left in last 24 will be removed by those member who left them. Email - chauhanmohan35@gmail.com Just a single email will work from Quickseller Only one person is responsible for this Quickseller he has to apologies for his wrong perception. I will return all the funds within 24 hours after getting email from him. Yep, this is really going to help you. ::) You did it to yourself, leave yourself appropriate thanks. That excuse is very lame and doesn't cut it nor excuse the blackmail with held funds that are not yours. Your actions are your own, live with them. Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: XinXan on June 11, 2015, 05:19:10 PM And this is why i always ask for bans against this type of people, whats the point in still seeing what this guy has to say, he is clearly a trash scammer, just ban him already and save us some time
Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: Quickseller on June 11, 2015, 05:26:00 PM I am going from here let me know when all the negative trust left in last 24 will be removed by those member who left them. I am not sure why you think I care about you returning the funds you are holding. Assuming you are telling the truth about not being the same person as the Ponzi you are promoting, then you are threatening to steal from another scammer, and if you don't pay the signature campaign participants then people who are promoting a scam will get scammed. I am not saying that it is okay to scam these people however these are not exactly high on my priority list of people that should be protected from scams. Email - chauhanmohan35@gmail.com Just a single email will work from Quickseller Only one person is responsible for this Quickseller he has to apologies for his wrong perception. I will return all the funds within 24 hours after getting email from him. Not only that but you transferred funds to what is likely one of your alt accounts. Additionally, there is strong evidence that you are in fact the person behind the two ponzis whose signature campaign you are managing/escrowing for. The fact that the first one trusted you with their money is highly suspicious as you had zero experience either holding money for others nor managing a signature campaign and you had very little trading history, however I gave you the benefit of the doubt on this. However you received a negative rating from Dooglas which gave you a trade with extreme caution tag and then another ponzi trusted you with their money after contacting at most a total of 7 sites (that you claim, I could only find evidence that you contacted three sites, two of which used you as escrow), this is simply too strong of an indication that you are the same person as the other Ponzi scam sites. My negative rating really does not matter, I am not on default trust so it will not show up by default, even if I was, I was not the first person to give you a negative rating on default trust, people are free to exclude and/or ignore my ratings. People can also likely come to the same conclusion that I came to. Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: DiamondCardz on June 11, 2015, 05:34:59 PM Allegations on me by Quickseller on me I will give all the answer here asked by anyone. "I was given access to BTCBLOGGER's account and reviewed his PM history with his permission. Here is what I found when reviewing your PM history: I was able to find PM's to/from the two likely scam sites that you have escrowed for. I was able to find a PM to(and from) a single site that rejected your services. Other then the above, I was unable to find any sites/users that you were sending/receiving PM's to/from regarding your signature campaign services. I would consider you proposing your services to various sites to be similar to "cold calling" which generally has a very low "conversation" rate, and an even lower rate when you actually make contact with your potential customers. However you were able to sell your services to 66% of your prospects and made contact with 100% of your prospects. Additionally, what you were doing would likely be considered to be PM spam and as a result would likely be something that would have resulted in a ban if such PM's were reported, which is something that does not appear to have happened. Additionally, you were able to get someone to trust you with their money after you received a negative trust rating from someone in the Default Trust network, and had a 'trade with extreme caution tag' which is highly suspicious. I would say that the PM evidence is inclusive at best, however the evidence suggesting that you are the same person as the ponzi scams you are "escrowing" for are undebunked." You keep asking people to verify this when I first verified this a very long ago. Why? It seems to me to just be some weak attempt at cleaning yourself after you screwed up big time and essentially tried to extort - no, you are still trying to extort, and when people point that out, you play the victim and say you're being falsely portrayed as a scammer. Do you really think you are helping your image? Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: Quickseller on June 11, 2015, 05:46:25 PM It seems that I received a negative rating from SNavy (the ponzi) saying that I falsely accused both him and BTCBLOGGER. It is interesting how the person who BTCBLOGGER is threatening to steal from is making a point to stick up for him in this way ::)
Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: the joint on June 11, 2015, 05:50:27 PM I am going from here let me know when all the negative trust left in last 24 will be removed by those member who left them. Email - chauhanmohan35@gmail.com Just a single email will work from Quickseller Only one person is responsible for this Quickseller he has to apologies for his wrong perception. I will return all the funds within 24 hours after getting email from him. Yep, this is really going to help you. ::) You did it to yourself, leave yourself appropriate thanks. He didn't "force" you to do anything. It's called a choice. You're greedy, and somehow you have convinced yourself that feeling as if you've been unfairly screwed over by one person gives you justification to screw over someone else. That's an ugly and detestable quality. All it shows is that your ethics are incredibly loose, and that whatever you think is right is accompanied by an unspoken footnote, "...as long as I get something out of it, too." Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: BTCBLOGGER on June 11, 2015, 05:58:53 PM Allegations on me by Quickseller on me I will give all the answer here asked by anyone. "I was given access to BTCBLOGGER's account and reviewed his PM history with his permission. Here is what I found when reviewing your PM history: I was able to find PM's to/from the two likely scam sites that you have escrowed for. I was able to find a PM to(and from) a single site that rejected your services. Other then the above, I was unable to find any sites/users that you were sending/receiving PM's to/from regarding your signature campaign services. I would consider you proposing your services to various sites to be similar to "cold calling" which generally has a very low "conversation" rate, and an even lower rate when you actually make contact with your potential customers. However you were able to sell your services to 66% of your prospects and made contact with 100% of your prospects. Additionally, what you were doing would likely be considered to be PM spam and as a result would likely be something that would have resulted in a ban if such PM's were reported, which is something that does not appear to have happened. Additionally, you were able to get someone to trust you with their money after you received a negative trust rating from someone in the Default Trust network, and had a 'trade with extreme caution tag' which is highly suspicious. I would say that the PM evidence is inclusive at best, however the evidence suggesting that you are the same person as the ponzi scams you are "escrowing" for are undebunked." You keep asking people to verify this when I first verified this a very long ago. Why? It seems to me to just be some weak attempt at cleaning yourself after you screwed up big time and essentially tried to extort - no, you are still trying to extort, and when people point that out, you play the victim and say you're being falsely portrayed as a scammer. Do you really think you are helping your image? I'm really very disappointed with this feeling like I'm am a big thief/scammer/killer etc I'm really angry with that. Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: arallmuus on June 11, 2015, 06:09:00 PM if you are able to do so with valid proof then I will commit suicide You are going to far with this, Basically why would you even care about your reputation here? Your reputation stays here and not the real world, if you are not a scammer or a ponzi operator then you are not . Basically the world doesnt even care about any of your reputation here to be honest but if you fails to do so you have to apologies for your mistake within next 30 days. This wont do, The most people that have left you negative trust would do is remove your negative trust or atleast change them to neutral. I've never seen someone do a public apology after giving a negative trust then later the claim of the negative trust is wrong To be honest, I dont think that BTCBLOGGER ran a ponzi here. He pmed me before when he was still newbie (or member) asking about removal of negative trust from vod. He seems to be honest but thats yeah I have no proof either that he isnt running any ponzi Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: sonnyltc on June 11, 2015, 06:15:42 PM Allegations on me by Quickseller on me I will give all the answer here asked by anyone. "I was given access to BTCBLOGGER's account and reviewed his PM history with his permission. Here is what I found when reviewing your PM history: I was able to find PM's to/from the two likely scam sites that you have escrowed for. I was able to find a PM to(and from) a single site that rejected your services. Other then the above, I was unable to find any sites/users that you were sending/receiving PM's to/from regarding your signature campaign services. I would consider you proposing your services to various sites to be similar to "cold calling" which generally has a very low "conversation" rate, and an even lower rate when you actually make contact with your potential customers. However you were able to sell your services to 66% of your prospects and made contact with 100% of your prospects. Additionally, what you were doing would likely be considered to be PM spam and as a result would likely be something that would have resulted in a ban if such PM's were reported, which is something that does not appear to have happened. Additionally, you were able to get someone to trust you with their money after you received a negative trust rating from someone in the Default Trust network, and had a 'trade with extreme caution tag' which is highly suspicious. I would say that the PM evidence is inclusive at best, however the evidence suggesting that you are the same person as the ponzi scams you are "escrowing" for are undebunked." You keep asking people to verify this when I first verified this a very long ago. Why? It seems to me to just be some weak attempt at cleaning yourself after you screwed up big time and essentially tried to extort - no, you are still trying to extort, and when people point that out, you play the victim and say you're being falsely portrayed as a scammer. Do you really think you are helping your image? I'm really very disappointed with this feeling like I'm am a big thief/scammer/killer etc I'm really angry with that. Don't suicide. Why don't give more interesting offer ?, maybe you will pay 10 btc to someone who will provide valid proof. edit : To be honest, I dont think that BTCBLOGGER ran a ponzi here. He pmed me before when he was still newbie (or member) asking about removal of negative trust from vod. He seems to be honest but thats yeah I have no proof either that he isnt running any ponzi I thought you're wrong. Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: BTCBLOGGER on June 11, 2015, 06:17:36 PM if you are able to do so with valid proof then I will commit suicide You are going to far with this, Basically why would you even care about your reputation here? Your reputation stays here and not the real world, if you are not a scammer or a ponzi operator then you are not . Basically the world doesnt even care about any of your reputation here to be honest but if you fails to do so you have to apologies for your mistake within next 30 days. This wont do, The most people that have left you negative trust would do is remove your negative trust or atleast change them to neutral. I've never seen someone do a public apology after giving a negative trust then later the claim of the negative trust is wrong To be honest, I dont think that BTCBLOGGER ran a ponzi here. He pmed me before when he was still newbie (or member) asking about removal of negative trust from vod. He seems to be honest but thats yeah I have no proof either that he isnt running any ponzi I think self respect is also a thing which have more valuable for me than my life that's all. Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: BTCBLOGGER on June 11, 2015, 06:19:49 PM Allegations on me by Quickseller on me I will give all the answer here asked by anyone. "I was given access to BTCBLOGGER's account and reviewed his PM history with his permission. Here is what I found when reviewing your PM history: I was able to find PM's to/from the two likely scam sites that you have escrowed for. I was able to find a PM to(and from) a single site that rejected your services. Other then the above, I was unable to find any sites/users that you were sending/receiving PM's to/from regarding your signature campaign services. I would consider you proposing your services to various sites to be similar to "cold calling" which generally has a very low "conversation" rate, and an even lower rate when you actually make contact with your potential customers. However you were able to sell your services to 66% of your prospects and made contact with 100% of your prospects. Additionally, what you were doing would likely be considered to be PM spam and as a result would likely be something that would have resulted in a ban if such PM's were reported, which is something that does not appear to have happened. Additionally, you were able to get someone to trust you with their money after you received a negative trust rating from someone in the Default Trust network, and had a 'trade with extreme caution tag' which is highly suspicious. I would say that the PM evidence is inclusive at best, however the evidence suggesting that you are the same person as the ponzi scams you are "escrowing" for are undebunked." You keep asking people to verify this when I first verified this a very long ago. Why? It seems to me to just be some weak attempt at cleaning yourself after you screwed up big time and essentially tried to extort - no, you are still trying to extort, and when people point that out, you play the victim and say you're being falsely portrayed as a scammer. Do you really think you are helping your image? I'm really very disappointed with this feeling like I'm am a big thief/scammer/killer etc I'm really angry with that. Don't suicide. Why don't give more interesting offer ?, maybe you will pay 10 btc to someone who will provide valid proof. edit : To be honest, I dont think that BTCBLOGGER ran a ponzi here. He pmed me before when he was still newbie (or member) asking about removal of negative trust from vod. He seems to be honest but thats yeah I have no proof either that he isnt running any ponzi I thought you're wrong. Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: sonnyltc on June 11, 2015, 06:24:20 PM I think my property is nearly equal to more than 1000+ BTC. Will you send your property to escrow ?, How do you send your property to escrow ? And I have one more question for you. have you ever promoted your own ponzi here ? Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: BTCBLOGGER on June 11, 2015, 06:31:44 PM I think my property is nearly equal to more than 1000+ BTC. Will you send your property to escrow ?, How do you send your property to escrow ? And I have one more question for you. have you ever promoted your own ponzi here ? Yes, Nearly 1 year ago when I joined the community first I did it but removed it after getting a message from a member because I was offering multiplier of x1.01 So I got many messages on this people making fun on me saying it was a ponzi and is the worst and least amount paying ponzi. In reality I was thinking to pay them with the process of mining. In reality I was unaware about all the fact about the ponzi. Leave any message for me here I will try to answer each and every one with honesty. Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: the joint on June 11, 2015, 06:36:49 PM Allegations on me by Quickseller on me I will give all the answer here asked by anyone. "I was given access to BTCBLOGGER's account and reviewed his PM history with his permission. Here is what I found when reviewing your PM history: I was able to find PM's to/from the two likely scam sites that you have escrowed for. I was able to find a PM to(and from) a single site that rejected your services. Other then the above, I was unable to find any sites/users that you were sending/receiving PM's to/from regarding your signature campaign services. I would consider you proposing your services to various sites to be similar to "cold calling" which generally has a very low "conversation" rate, and an even lower rate when you actually make contact with your potential customers. However you were able to sell your services to 66% of your prospects and made contact with 100% of your prospects. Additionally, what you were doing would likely be considered to be PM spam and as a result would likely be something that would have resulted in a ban if such PM's were reported, which is something that does not appear to have happened. Additionally, you were able to get someone to trust you with their money after you received a negative trust rating from someone in the Default Trust network, and had a 'trade with extreme caution tag' which is highly suspicious. I would say that the PM evidence is inclusive at best, however the evidence suggesting that you are the same person as the ponzi scams you are "escrowing" for are undebunked." You keep asking people to verify this when I first verified this a very long ago. Why? It seems to me to just be some weak attempt at cleaning yourself after you screwed up big time and essentially tried to extort - no, you are still trying to extort, and when people point that out, you play the victim and say you're being falsely portrayed as a scammer. Do you really think you are helping your image? I'm really very disappointed with this feeling like I'm am a big thief/scammer/killer etc I'm really angry with that. The negative feedback I left has nothing to do with: Quote ...prov[ing] that I am cryptommm and SNavy... Instead, it has everything to do with: Quote I'm running with the money now and will return the money to the owner only if Quickseller remove his trust rating from my account and... Money that isn't yours, isn't yours. Simple concept. Whether or not you steal from someone else shouldn't, in any way, be dependent upon what Quickseller does. Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: oser41eric on June 11, 2015, 06:40:15 PM You may or may not run ponzi and be a ponzi scammer we are yet to prove this beyond any doubt, we have however confirmed that you do in fact escrow and manage their advertising 'signature campaign' so you are helping them scam for a few dollars so in my eyes you are just as bad as the ponzi admin maybe even worse than him because you are easily brought.. You have no chance at getting your negatives removed now.
Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: sonnyltc on June 11, 2015, 06:41:53 PM I think my property is nearly equal to more than 1000+ BTC. Will you send your property to escrow ?, How do you send your property to escrow ? And I have one more question for you. have you ever promoted your own ponzi here ? Yes, Nearly 1 year ago when I joined the community first I did it but removed it after getting a message from a member because I was offering multiplier of x1.01 So I got many messages on this people making fun on me saying it was a ponzi and is the worst and least amount paying ponzi. In reality I was thinking to pay them with the process of mining. In reality I was unaware about all the fact about the ponzi. Leave any message for me here I will try to answer each and every one with honesty. at least you have admitted you ran ponzi before. Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: dooglus on June 11, 2015, 06:52:10 PM Hi dooglus how are you ? Have you saw my PM if you please if already seen please PM me. Hi. I saw these two PMs sent at 3:17am and 3:21am. I'm sorry it takes me more than 4 minutes to respond to messages while I'm sleeping... https://i.imgur.com/ljfSelI.png I'm not sure what you want me to say - the message doesn't seem to be addressed to me. I don't know who romano is, and doubt I "know him well". Other than that I don't have any comment to make. Oh thank you very much for making me a scammer you guys are awesome Really awesome. You did it to yourself, leave yourself appropriate thanks. No Quickseller forced me to do that i'm still agree to return all the fund provided all who leaved negative trust except dooglus agrees to remove it from my account. Nobody forced you to become a scammer. You chose it yourself. Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: BTCBLOGGER on June 12, 2015, 12:02:07 AM You may or may not run ponzi and be a ponzi scammer we are yet to prove this beyond any doubt, we have however confirmed that you do in fact escrow and manage their advertising 'signature campaign' so you are helping them scam for a few dollars so in my eyes you are just as bad as the ponzi admin maybe even worse than him because you are easily brought.. You have no chance at getting your negatives removed now. I just want Quickseller to apologise for his mistake that he made .Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: KWH on June 12, 2015, 12:03:56 AM You may or may not run ponzi and be a ponzi scammer we are yet to prove this beyond any doubt, we have however confirmed that you do in fact escrow and manage their advertising 'signature campaign' so you are helping them scam for a few dollars so in my eyes you are just as bad as the ponzi admin maybe even worse than him because you are easily brought.. You have no chance at getting your negatives removed now. I just want Quickseller to apologise for his mistake that he made .Even if that happened, it does NOT absolve you of your actions. Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: BTCBLOGGER on June 12, 2015, 12:29:27 AM You may or may not run ponzi and be a ponzi scammer we are yet to prove this beyond any doubt, we have however confirmed that you do in fact escrow and manage their advertising 'signature campaign' so you are helping them scam for a few dollars so in my eyes you are just as bad as the ponzi admin maybe even worse than him because you are easily brought.. You have no chance at getting your negatives removed now. I just want Quickseller to apologise for his mistake that he made .Even if that happened, it does NOT absolve you of your actions. Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: BTCBLOGGER on June 12, 2015, 12:43:28 AM Disconnected .....
Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: btcton on June 12, 2015, 03:20:24 AM You may or may not run ponzi and be a ponzi scammer we are yet to prove this beyond any doubt, we have however confirmed that you do in fact escrow and manage their advertising 'signature campaign' so you are helping them scam for a few dollars so in my eyes you are just as bad as the ponzi admin maybe even worse than him because you are easily brought.. You have no chance at getting your negatives removed now. I just want Quickseller to apologise for his mistake that he made .Even if that happened, it does NOT absolve you of your actions. Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: oser41eric on June 13, 2015, 08:30:08 AM You may or may not run ponzi and be a ponzi scammer we are yet to prove this beyond any doubt, we have however confirmed that you do in fact escrow and manage their advertising 'signature campaign' so you are helping them scam for a few dollars so in my eyes you are just as bad as the ponzi admin maybe even worse than him because you are easily brought.. You have no chance at getting your negatives removed now. I just want Quickseller to apologise for his mistake that he made .There is not much of a mistake as far as I can see mate. What you should be doing is finding some morals and apologize to yourself for working with scammers and reaching out for them to let you work for them. You get paid a few dollars but that is traded for enabling these scumbags to scam peoples dollars so you are just as involved and are a ponzi scammer the sooner you realize that the better. Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: Twipple on June 13, 2015, 11:13:19 AM I beleive the account was anyways involved in ban evasion https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1044214.0
His old alts on the forum were banned. Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: minifrij on June 13, 2015, 04:55:37 PM So, is this guy still blackmailing money from people or did he give it back?
You're doing yourself no good by doing this man. Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: arallmuus on June 13, 2015, 05:09:10 PM So, is this guy still blackmailing money from people or did he give it back? He hasnt give it back yet and I doubt that he will be giving it back after his demand for an apology from is quickseller within 24 hours isnt fulfilled and it has passed 24 hours from the time he posted that. He should have gone this far and he made himself indeed a scammer now because of his silly action It seems the BTC has been moved to this address https://blockchain.info/address/1514KYbq56qM4kd32DJwB5DVD1kNSZ2qyT Only one person is responsible for this Quickseller he has to apologies for his wrong perception. I will return all the funds within 24 hours after getting email from him. EDIT : I dont see any negative trust from the owner of the funds despite that he had stole it https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=403194 and no complaint from Snavy https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=485410;sa=showPosts Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: minifrij on June 13, 2015, 05:17:14 PM He hasnt give it back yet and I doubt that he will be giving it back after his demand for an apology from is quickseller within 24 hours isnt fulfilled and it has passed 24 hours from the time he posted that. He should have gone this far and he made himself indeed a scammer now because of his silly action Thank you for the information, left another negative trust.It seems the BTC has been moved to this address https://blockchain.info/address/1514KYbq56qM4kd32DJwB5DVD1kNSZ2qyT quote snip EDIT : I dont see any negative trust from the owner of the funds despite that he had stole it https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=403194 Also, about the owner not leaving negative trust. In order for someone to create a ponzi, try to advertise it on this forum, and then use someone with negative trust as an escrow would take some lack of brain functionality. Maybe they just haven't realized that he has taken the funds yet. Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: BTCBLOGGER on June 14, 2015, 07:12:36 AM I'm back after a two day trip to Agra and kannauj I'm back and here is the answer SNavy is not making any feedback because I did a PM to him giving all the details why I'm going offline and also I'm testing whether Quickseller apologize for his mistake or not that's why didn't revealed to anybody except SNavy but he didn't going to leave a negative trust on his account with all the happening in detail.
The reason behind i was unable to do weekly payment is only that i have to go for a visit in Agra and kannuaj to look my grand parents but tragedy happened there I forget papers of my car there so looks like I have to go there again to take my papers back(papers of my car - license and insurance). Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: XinXan on June 14, 2015, 12:56:32 PM Btcblogger is going insane slowly and slowly, he has been sending me really weird pms lately, including this one:
Hello, Quickseller I want a escrow service from you please reply What the hell? Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: BTCBLOGGER on June 14, 2015, 01:03:16 PM Btcblogger is going insane slowly and slowly, he has been sending me really weird pms lately, including this one: Oh sorry if you are not Quickseller today I saw Quick seller is not online and also I found on a thread that someone saying you Quick seller and asking not to post here so I thought you are quickseller but if you are not I will ask him to do escrow when he will come online.Hello, Quickseller I want a escrow service from you please reply What the hell? Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: Quickseller on June 24, 2015, 02:45:49 AM From the looks of it BTCBLOGGER scammed someone out of 704 DOGE and a newbie account (refrence (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1021034.msg11698053;topicseen#msg11698053))
Amount: 0.001BTC k just send the 704 Doge here DJtYMgqP9mCNs7rb8zUVfiW8kdrEThPCWu and your account details through Pm i will fund you.Collateral: This Account Repayment Amount: 0.002 Repayment Date: 27.06.2015 BTC Address: 1A7EWrfkQWbBiz9b4TE6HUs3Xyrrn7cnk8 regards you have one day to repay okay Account: DavieT1337 Send 0.001 BTC to Bitcoin Adress is: 1A7EWrfkQWbBiz9b4TE6HUs3Xyrrn7cnk8 In 1 Day we trade it back, Okay? Dogies already confirmed twice. Thanx for trade regards k sent thanks for the trade Account is in my control now BTCBLOGGER Scamed me about 700 Doge and my Forum Account DavieT1337 :D ??? What is wrong with you guys? BTCBLogger, why u dont answer anymore? i dont get it, why btcblogger give loan in thread someone else.. maybe he just offline Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: BTCBLOGGER on June 28, 2015, 04:46:23 AM From the looks of it BTCBLOGGER scammed someone out of 704 DOGE and a newbie account (refrence (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1021034.msg11698053;topicseen#msg11698053)) I was out of town in vashno devi check it out there is some network issues and prepaid network providers are not allowed there and it takes nearly 5-7 days as we have to walk/run almost 6+5+3+6+5+3+3.5+3.5 = 35 km quite long distance.Amount: 0.001BTC k just send the 704 Doge here DJtYMgqP9mCNs7rb8zUVfiW8kdrEThPCWu and your account details through Pm i will fund you.Collateral: This Account Repayment Amount: 0.002 Repayment Date: 27.06.2015 BTC Address: 1A7EWrfkQWbBiz9b4TE6HUs3Xyrrn7cnk8 regards you have one day to repay okay Account: DavieT1337 Send 0.001 BTC to Bitcoin Adress is: 1A7EWrfkQWbBiz9b4TE6HUs3Xyrrn7cnk8 In 1 Day we trade it back, Okay? Dogies already confirmed twice. Thanx for trade regards k sent thanks for the trade Account is in my control now BTCBLOGGER Scamed me about 700 Doge and my Forum Account DavieT1337 :D ??? What is wrong with you guys? BTCBLogger, why u dont answer anymore? i dont get it, why btcblogger give loan in thread someone else.. maybe he just offline You are welcome in India. Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: Muhammed Zakir on June 28, 2015, 07:47:15 AM From the looks of it BTCBLOGGER scammed someone out of 704 DOGE and a newbie account (refrence (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1021034.msg11698053;topicseen#msg11698053)) I was out of town in vashno devi check it out there is some network issues and prepaid network providers are not allowed there and it takes nearly 5-7 days as we have to walk/run almost 6+5+3+6+5+3+3.5+3.5 = 35 km quite long distance.--quotes of probable scam-- It looks like someone may have messed up the quote You are welcome in India. 5-7 days to walk 35 km? ??? Average human walking speed is 5 km/h. But lets check how much time it take to walk 35 km at different speeds: 0.5 km/h = 70 hours 1 km/h = 35 hours 2 km/h = 17.5 hours 3 km/h = ~11.7 hours 4 km/h = 8.75 hours 5 km/h = 7 hours So...? Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: BTCBLOGGER on June 28, 2015, 08:08:52 AM From the looks of it BTCBLOGGER scammed someone out of 704 DOGE and a newbie account (refrence (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1021034.msg11698053;topicseen#msg11698053)) I was out of town in vashno devi check it out there is some network issues and prepaid network providers are not allowed there and it takes nearly 5-7 days as we have to walk/run almost 6+5+3+6+5+3+3.5+3.5 = 35 km quite long distance.--quotes of probable scam-- It looks like someone may have messed up the quote You are welcome in India. 5-7 days to walk 35 km? ??? Average human walking speed is 5 km/h. But lets check how much time it take to walk 35 km at different speeds: 0.5 km/h = 70 hours 1 km/h = 35 hours 2 km/h = 17.5 hours 3 km/h = ~11.7 hours 4 km/h = 8.75 hours 5 km/h = 7 hours So...? Check how we can do yatra of vashno devi. First of all 12-14 hour of travel by train from Delhi to Jammu tawi after that we have to hire a mini van or bus which takes us to Katra acutual place from where our journey starts. Find a hotel there take rest for 5-10 hour and then start you journey. And it takes 48-72 hours to do darshan at ardh kumari after reaching it by travelling 6 km due to high rush in the month of may and June. After doing darshan of garbhjune cave we have to go 5 km away by walking at vashno devi mandir. After refreshing/Bathing we have to take a prasad to start the darshan of devi in pindi and due to high rush we get chance to see the pindi after 1-2 hour from where we have to start journey to bharaw baba at 3.5 km away but darshan of bharav baba does not take much time nearly 20-30 min after that we comes back to hotel to take rest for a day and then go to shiv khori cave by bus which takes 3-4 hours to reach from where we have to start walking again 3.5 km to reach shiv khori cave and due to rush it will take 2-3 hour out side cave to enter into the cave. Then jitu baba and first darshan of devi etc... 1 day is reserved for the purchase of prasad oh wait I can show pictures of prasad and lockets which I get from there. Let me know if you want more description. Title: Re: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer Post by: Muhammed Zakir on June 28, 2015, 08:39:14 AM https://sites.google.com/site/pahleaap/vaishnodevi-travel Check how we can do yatra of vashno devi. First of all 12-14 hour of travel by train from Delhi to Jammu tawi after that we have to hire a mini van or bus which takes us to Katra acutual place from where our journey starts. Find a hotel there take rest for 5-10 hour and then start you journey. And it takes 48-72 hours to do darshan at ardh kumari after reaching it by travelling 6 km due to high rush in the month of may and June. After doing darshan of garbhjune cave we have to go 5 km away by walking at vashno devi mandir. After refreshing/Bathing we have to take a prasad to start the darshan of devi in pindi and due to high rush we get chance to see the pindi after 1-2 hour from where we have to start journey to bharaw baba at 3.5 km away but darshan of bharav baba does not take much time nearly 20-30 min after that we comes back to hotel to take rest for a day and then go to shiv khori cave by bus which takes 3-4 hours to reach from where we have to start walking again 3.5 km to reach shiv khori cave and due to rush it will take 2-3 hour out side cave to enter into the cave. Then jitu baba and first darshan of devi etc... 1 day is reserved for the purchase of prasad oh wait I can show pictures of prasad and lockets which I get from there. Let me know if you want more description. Well, you said you walk/run ~35 km and I thought that it will be similar to Sabarimala walk and people going to Sabarimala usually don't rest for long but in your case, you rest longer. I don't wamt evidence for that journey of yours. If you did take 704 Doge and Newbie account, give it back. |
