|
Title: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: devthedev on December 23, 2016, 05:08:28 AM The feminist movement has completely lost its intent and has been entirely twisted and radicalized into a man-hating movement.
Backstory: https://www.facebook.com/myiannopoulos/videos/759447800859784/ Milo once posed the question: what would you rather have, feminism or cancer? A two-time cancer survivor has even stated she would rather have cancer than feminism. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKGMwTsBd0g What are your thoughts on modern day feminism? Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: awesome31312 on December 23, 2016, 05:26:53 AM Feminism gave women:
The right to vote The right to wear just what their male counterparts have been allowed to wear at the beach The right to be free of marital abuse/rape The right to not have to marry Christian pedos The fact that you have to compare it to cancer means you're either a Christian pedo or just ignorant of history. Better to just admit your ignorance of history. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: devthedev on December 23, 2016, 05:39:28 AM Feminism gave women: The right to vote The right to wear just what their male counterparts have been allowed to wear at the beach The right to be free of marital abuse/rape The right to not have to marry Christian pedos The fact that you have to compare it to cancer means you're either a Christian pedo or just ignorant of history. Better to just admit your ignorance of history. Did you watch the video or read anything in the OP before you commenting? Yes, feminism did help bring about those things, but the new wave of feminism is garbage. I support the true meaning of feminism. You don't have to call yourself a feminist to fight for equal rights for women, not to mention women are already equal under law in America. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: johnny11011 on December 23, 2016, 05:52:47 AM Personal view: any real feminist, should be unreservedly support surrogacy, abortion, contraception, frozen eggs, IVF and other reproductive technologies. You should even devote yourself to this research field. Whether it's money or energy. Because the biggest obstacle to women's rights is the right to reproduce. Then reproductive rights are obviously more important, only sacrifice feminism.
Only when these two powers coexist peacefully can women's rights be possible. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: goradyne on December 23, 2016, 06:02:55 AM In all honesty, abortion is a silly issue. Phase so it is blanket illegal, with exceptions of Poverty, Rape, Incest, Death to Mother. Third Wave Feminism needs to die, people are becoming mentally weaker because of rubbish, a unified, strong society is required. Feminism has done good things, but I think it's time for Genderism and Reality to take over.
I'll Gladly Take Cancer. and some BTC XD Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: bryant.coleman on December 23, 2016, 06:07:39 AM Feminism gave women: The right to vote The right to wear just what their male counterparts have been allowed to wear at the beach The right to be free of marital abuse/rape The right to not have to marry Christian pedos The fact that you have to compare it to cancer means you're either a Christian pedo or just ignorant of history. Better to just admit your ignorance of history. Here comes one of those brainwashed radical feminists, who hate men. Typical liberal argument. If you don't agree with me, then you are a pedo, a molester, a murderer, .... etc. This is exactly the reason why we are now witnessing a backlash against this ideology. The election of Donald Trump as the president of the United States is just the beginning. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: devthedev on December 23, 2016, 06:24:32 AM Feminism gave women: The right to vote The right to wear just what their male counterparts have been allowed to wear at the beach The right to be free of marital abuse/rape The right to not have to marry Christian pedos The fact that you have to compare it to cancer means you're either a Christian pedo or just ignorant of history. Better to just admit your ignorance of history. Here comes one of those brainwashed radical feminists, who hate men. Typical liberal argument. If you don't agree with me, then you are a pedo, a molester, a murderer, .... etc. This is exactly the reason why we are now witnessing a backlash against this ideology. The election of Donald Trump as the president of the United States is just the beginning. Exactly, factually nonsensical statements like his are only used to silence others' opinions to compensate for a weak argument. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: goradyne on December 23, 2016, 06:33:31 AM Feminism gave women: The right to vote The right to wear just what their male counterparts have been allowed to wear at the beach The right to be free of marital abuse/rape The right to not have to marry Christian pedos The fact that you have to compare it to cancer means you're either a Christian pedo or just ignorant of history. Better to just admit your ignorance of history. Here comes one of those brainwashed radical feminists, who hate men. Typical liberal argument. If you don't agree with me, then you are a pedo, a molester, a murderer, .... etc. This is exactly the reason why we are now witnessing a backlash against this ideology. The election of Donald Trump as the president of the United States is just the beginning. Exactly, factually nonsensical statements like his are only used to silence others' opinions to compensate for a weak argument. So, "The right to not have to marry Christian pedos" isn't a nonsensical statement? And yes, they gave the right to vote, and most of these things were in their agenda. But 40+ years on, feminism has evolved, like how the KKK evolved from a slavery, to its 20s form, to the 60s and onwards, only this time feminism is moving to the left. How about instead of arguing about the bs wage gap, you look at Mauritania and try to stop de facto govt-promoted slavery? And listen to opinions you don't like and try to understand the other side. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: Actualiteit on December 23, 2016, 09:54:53 AM feminism has evolved To me it's more like it's devolved into a bunch of hateful emotion-driven pack of shouting apes who have totalitarian tendencies to shut down everyone and -thing that does not fully agree with them. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: bryant.coleman on December 23, 2016, 10:02:40 AM How about instead of arguing about the bs wage gap The "BS wage gap" will not exist if the women are capable of producing the quantity and quality, which the men are capable of. There are a lot of women who are better than men in jobs, and they receive higher than average salaries as well. But arguing that women must receive salary at a level equal to that of men, even if the quality and quantity of their output is lower, is against meritocracy. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: Jet Cash on December 23, 2016, 11:55:09 AM We have all got cancer cells. Most of us are able to kill them via our immune system before they make any difference to our lives. However, drugs, both pharmaceutical and recreational can weaken out immune sytems, bad and poisoned food is another factor that helps cancer to grow, The other thing that helps cancer cells to increase is anti-cancer treatment - nobody has ever been "cured" of cancer, despite $billions in research.
So what about feminism, Well I like women, and I think that they should be treated as equal, but different. Feminism is as bad as misogyny. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: BitcoinPicasso on December 23, 2016, 03:02:49 PM I would rather have cancer since its just a disease and curable with cannabis oil.
On the other hand feminism is like cancer but one that cannot be cured. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: Mersedes on December 23, 2016, 03:20:33 PM I would rather have cancer since its just a disease and curable with cannabis oil. Cancer is curable only in the case if you go to the doctor at an early stage. Similarly, and feminism. If a woman expresses feminist views should offer her a job as a loader and take on a more masculine duties. After a few days she will refuse these ideas.On the other hand feminism is like cancer but one that cannot be cured. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: saddampbuh on December 23, 2016, 03:59:46 PM women's rights have given us alimony, sexual immorality, bloated welfare states and the refugee crisis as it is women voters who keep liberal left wing political parties in power, they need to be put back in their place
https://i.imgur.com/1ABsbdL.png Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: Klima on December 23, 2016, 04:15:17 PM women's rights have given us alimony, sexual immorality, bloated welfare states and the refugee crisis as it is women voters who keep liberal left wing political parties in power, they need to be put back in their place You're not a Muslim? You have thoughts very similar to Islam. What makes you so special that put themselves above women? For me all people are the same. There's just what is accepted for women and what is accepted for men. Ideas the same I hate Islam with Muslims.https://i.imgur.com/1ABsbdL.png Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: saddampbuh on December 23, 2016, 04:57:56 PM You're not a Muslim? You have thoughts very similar to Islam. What makes you so special that put themselves above women? For me all people are the same. There's just what is accepted for women and what is accepted for men. Ideas the same I hate Islam with Muslims. they are obviously not the same. did you look at the map i posted? men tend to act in their group's interests while women are much more likely to take reckless decisions based on emotion that can have catastrophic consequences for themselves and others. that's why men vote for strong borders and women vote to be "kind" to immigrants. feminism teaches young girls from an early age to look own on married family life and apply their caring mothering instincts to merkel's mud invaders.no i'm not muslim but i'd rather be one than an effeminate secular european male who believes in egalitarian common humanity childishness. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: Sithara007 on December 23, 2016, 05:12:25 PM women's rights have given us alimony, sexual immorality, bloated welfare states and the refugee crisis as it is women voters who keep liberal left wing political parties in power, they need to be put back in their place The feminist women want to sit at home without any work, and leach off the hard working males for alimony. The extreme-leftist parties support this, and therefore, they will vote for them. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: devthedev on December 23, 2016, 05:25:40 PM How about instead of arguing about the bs wage gap The "BS wage gap" will not exist if the women are capable of producing the quantity and quality, which the men are capable of. There are a lot of women who are better than men in jobs, and they receive higher than average salaries as well. But arguing that women must receive salary at a level equal to that of men, even if the quality and quantity of their output is lower, is against meritocracy. Yep! In the US, women are equal under law. If you get paid less for the same work, sue. Equal output, equal pay. It's not that hard of a concept. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: xavier77 on December 23, 2016, 05:32:14 PM Although I don't want to die of cancer, I would say that feminism is actually feminazism. To be honest, those fools think they could get everything they want sitting at their homes eating pizzas while we men took bullets on our chests protecting those fat people. Leave those worthless scums on an island, let them see for themselves who volunteers to works as a farmer, who takes care of electric connections and who could have enough knowledge to provide medication without asking a male for help. They need to be treated like males are, bashed for every crime they commit even if they fake tears.
Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: ekaterina77 on December 23, 2016, 05:39:02 PM women's rights have given us alimony, sexual immorality, bloated welfare states and the refugee crisis as it is women voters who keep liberal left wing political parties in power, they need to be put back in their place The feminist women want to sit at home without any work, and leach off the hard working males for alimony. The extreme-leftist parties support this, and therefore, they will vote for them. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: Sithara007 on December 23, 2016, 05:51:31 PM women's rights have given us alimony, sexual immorality, bloated welfare states and the refugee crisis as it is women voters who keep liberal left wing political parties in power, they need to be put back in their place The feminist women want to sit at home without any work, and leach off the hard working males for alimony. The extreme-leftist parties support this, and therefore, they will vote for them. For the same job, the salary varies according to the skills and proficiency. Even among the male workers, the salary can vary by a great degree. If the women are having the necessary skills and proficiency, then they will get a good salary. Else, they need to improve their skills, rather than wasting time by claiming gender bias. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: devthedev on December 23, 2016, 05:53:22 PM women's rights have given us alimony, sexual immorality, bloated welfare states and the refugee crisis as it is women voters who keep liberal left wing political parties in power, they need to be put back in their place The feminist women want to sit at home without any work, and leach off the hard working males for alimony. The extreme-leftist parties support this, and therefore, they will vote for them. Where is there not equality in the workplace? If women were cheaper to hire, we would not have any men in the workforce. Basic economics. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: TicTacTic on December 23, 2016, 05:59:16 PM women's rights have given us alimony, sexual immorality, bloated welfare states and the refugee crisis as it is women voters who keep liberal left wing political parties in power, they need to be put back in their place The feminist women want to sit at home without any work, and leach off the hard working males for alimony. The extreme-leftist parties support this, and therefore, they will vote for them. Where is there not equality in the workplace? If women were cheaper to hire, we would not have any men in the workforce. Basic economics. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: Sithara007 on December 23, 2016, 06:04:54 PM Where is there not equality in the workplace? If women were cheaper to hire, we would not have any men in the workforce. Basic economics. Compared to the women, the men are cheaper to hire. For women, there are other expenses beside the salary and other perks. Also, they are less likely to work on night shifts and overtime. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: TicTacTic on December 23, 2016, 06:17:28 PM Where is there not equality in the workplace? If women were cheaper to hire, we would not have any men in the workforce. Basic economics. Compared to the women, the men are cheaper to hire. For women, there are other expenses beside the salary and other perks. Also, they are less likely to work on night shifts and overtime. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: Gasturcas on December 23, 2016, 06:25:38 PM I believe Feminism seems to be a good idea, but not everything has been fine. Advantage are as follows: Equality with man. Women were able to participate in elections. Able to speak in public. Ability to demand their rights. Some of its disadvantage are as follows: Some women think that a man and a woman should be equal in everything. Some women have preferred to live with a lesbian and forget the men. I still prefer feminism than Cancer.
Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: tracktorr on December 23, 2016, 06:52:51 PM I believe Feminism seems to be a good idea, but not everything has been fine. Advantage are as follows: Equality with man. Women were able to participate in elections. Able to speak in public. Ability to demand their rights. Some of its disadvantage are as follows: Some women think that a man and a woman should be equal in everything. Some women have preferred to live with a lesbian and forget the men. I still prefer feminism than Cancer. Cancer kills its host, and feminism does not kill. It helps women to be convinced of the fallacy of their views, or Vice versa. Because women are different. For lesbians it's quite normal.Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: Taras on December 24, 2016, 11:05:38 AM I don't like it when people mix up traditional feminism with whatever those Tumblr idiots are spreading. Not all women are morons, as some may seem to think, and feminists are not all special snowflakes that go out of their way to be offended by things. This new group of people, yes, okay, maybe worse than cancer. Maybe. But cancer kills people. Feminazism only turns them into socially inept jerks. Real feminism gave us women's suffrage and the like. You know the story. It strives for equality, not attention, and so l voted for it in this poll.
Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: asdin66fa on December 24, 2016, 11:21:49 AM First, women's status has been low, no matter what women do. In today's society, it is true that many women become housewives after the status becomes lower, which is caused by the values of society as a whole.
Secondly, because of the low status of women, so women have to go to rob the male duties to do, in order to improve their status and interests, which is also the cause of Feminism Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: bryant.coleman on December 24, 2016, 01:23:51 PM I don't like it when people mix up traditional feminism with whatever those Tumblr idiots are spreading. Not all women are morons, as some may seem to think, and feminists are not all special snowflakes that go out of their way to be offended by things. This new group of people, yes, okay, maybe worse than cancer. Maybe. But cancer kills people. Feminazism only turns them into socially inept jerks. Real feminism gave us women's suffrage and the like. You know the story. It strives for equality, not attention, and so l voted for it in this poll. If you want to know what feminazism is actually capable of, then you just need to look at the current situation in Sweden and Norway. Once home to the ferocious Vikings, the men-folk in these nations have lost their masculinity, and have been reduced to feminine androids, who are not capable of defending themselves. And more worryingly, this version of the radical feminism is spreading across the globe. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: saddampbuh on December 24, 2016, 02:24:48 PM If you want to know what feminazism is actually capable of, then you just need to look at the current situation in Sweden and Norway. Once home to the ferocious Vikings, the men-folk in these nations have lost their masculinity, and have been reduced to feminine androids, who are not capable of defending themselves. And more worryingly, this version of the radical feminism is spreading across the globe. in sweden and denmark cops can arrest you for being too big and muscular and force you to submit to testing for anabolic steroids, just having them in your blood is a criminal offence, i swear i'm not trolling this is a real thingTitle: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: Leprikon on December 24, 2016, 02:31:00 PM If you want to know what feminazism is actually capable of, then you just need to look at the current situation in Sweden and Norway. Once home to the ferocious Vikings, the men-folk in these nations have lost their masculinity, and have been reduced to feminine androids, who are not capable of defending themselves. And more worryingly, this version of the radical feminism is spreading across the globe. in sweden and denmark cops can arrest you for being too big and muscular and force you to submit to testing for anabolic steroids, just having them in your blood is a criminal offence, i swear i'm not trolling this is a real thingTitle: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: BADecker on December 24, 2016, 02:35:54 PM Which would I rather have, feminism or cancer?
Feminism! You can always beat a woman into subjection, but you can't always beat cancer. 8) Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: Sithara007 on December 24, 2016, 02:40:36 PM If you want to know what feminazism is actually capable of, then you just need to look at the current situation in Sweden and Norway. Once home to the ferocious Vikings, the men-folk in these nations have lost their masculinity, and have been reduced to feminine androids, who are not capable of defending themselves. And more worryingly, this version of the radical feminism is spreading across the globe. in sweden and denmark cops can arrest you for being too big and muscular and force you to submit to testing for anabolic steroids, just having them in your blood is a criminal offence, i swear i'm not trolling this is a real thingDenmark has not yet stooped to the level of Sweden and Norway, probably due to the efforts by the Danish People's Party. They have been able to block most of the anti-male legislations put forward by the left. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: Leprikon on December 24, 2016, 02:45:33 PM If you want to know what feminazism is actually capable of, then you just need to look at the current situation in Sweden and Norway. Once home to the ferocious Vikings, the men-folk in these nations have lost their masculinity, and have been reduced to feminine androids, who are not capable of defending themselves. And more worryingly, this version of the radical feminism is spreading across the globe. in sweden and denmark cops can arrest you for being too big and muscular and force you to submit to testing for anabolic steroids, just having them in your blood is a criminal offence, i swear i'm not trolling this is a real thingDenmark has not yet stooped to the level of Sweden and Norway, probably due to the efforts by the Danish People's Party. They have been able to block most of the anti-male legislations put forward by the left. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: Tyrantt on December 24, 2016, 02:52:36 PM Feminism gave women: The right to vote The right to wear just what their male counterparts have been allowed to wear at the beach The right to be free of marital abuse/rape The right to not have to marry Christian pedos The fact that you have to compare it to cancer means you're either a Christian pedo or just ignorant of history. Better to just admit your ignorance of history. Not that kind of feminism, that's was an important movement in the history, but this one https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1JQUG7doCE (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1JQUG7doCE) The kill all man, there are 42 genders,etc.. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: Tyrantt on December 24, 2016, 02:54:49 PM Which would I rather have, feminism or cancer? Feminism! You can always beat a woman into subjection, but you can't always beat cancer. 8) lol this might be the best answer so far. But seriously, do you guys know the "feminism" today? I'ts more like "we want to kill all men","all man are rapists","White male priviledge"..... rather than equality. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: Sithara007 on December 24, 2016, 02:56:31 PM If you want to know what feminazism is actually capable of, then you just need to look at the current situation in Sweden and Norway. Once home to the ferocious Vikings, the men-folk in these nations have lost their masculinity, and have been reduced to feminine androids, who are not capable of defending themselves. And more worryingly, this version of the radical feminism is spreading across the globe. in sweden and denmark cops can arrest you for being too big and muscular and force you to submit to testing for anabolic steroids, just having them in your blood is a criminal offence, i swear i'm not trolling this is a real thingDenmark has not yet stooped to the level of Sweden and Norway, probably due to the efforts by the Danish People's Party. They have been able to block most of the anti-male legislations put forward by the left. Read this article, and you will find the details. https://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/feminist-governance-feminism/by-law-swedish-men-are-2nd-class-citizens/ And now they have even formed a political party, called the "Feminist Initiative". The ultimate aim is to take away all the powers from male Swedes. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: Tyrantt on December 24, 2016, 02:59:35 PM First, women's status has been low, no matter what women do. In today's society, it is true that many women become housewives after the status becomes lower, which is caused by the values of society as a whole. Secondly, because of the low status of women, so women have to go to rob the male duties to do, in order to improve their status and interests, which is also the cause of Feminism What the fuck are you saying? How's it been low? Maybe in Muslim countries... no, just no. What low status? Where? Here there are plenty of women in the leading positions and super careers, stop talking like all countries are thrid world muslim countries. There is no more need for feminism in this world, not in the west tho. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: Tyrantt on December 24, 2016, 03:03:53 PM I don't like it when people mix up traditional feminism with whatever those Tumblr idiots are spreading. Not all women are morons, as some may seem to think, and feminists are not all special snowflakes that go out of their way to be offended by things. This new group of people, yes, okay, maybe worse than cancer. Maybe. But cancer kills people. Feminazism only turns them into socially inept jerks. Real feminism gave us women's suffrage and the like. You know the story. It strives for equality, not attention, and so l voted for it in this poll. Sadly those feminazis are on the move right now, and you can see them everywhere, sadly that movement is slowly coming here. I've heard one friend talking about how men earn more than women everywhere in the world, so I asked her what college is she attending and she's attending the philosophy.. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: Sithara007 on December 24, 2016, 03:18:17 PM What low status? Where? Here there are plenty of women in the leading positions and super careers, stop talking like all countries are thrid world muslim countries. There is no more need for feminism in this world, not in the west tho. Add to this the fact that a large number of the presidents and prime ministers around the world are female. A female (Hillary Clinton) was very close to becoming the most powerful person in the world. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: chachaa on December 24, 2016, 03:22:56 PM What low status? Where? Here there are plenty of women in the leading positions and super careers, stop talking like all countries are thrid world muslim countries. There is no more need for feminism in this world, not in the west tho. Add to this the fact that a large number of the presidents and prime ministers around the world are female. A female (Hillary Clinton) was very close to becoming the most powerful person in the world. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: Roger Burton on December 24, 2016, 09:17:13 PM I can't compare those too. It's wrong bcs feminism is ideology but cancer is a horrible disease. And you have to ashamed to choose between these two. >:(
Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: varyspro on December 24, 2016, 09:22:13 PM I can't compare those too. It's wrong bcs feminism is ideology but cancer is a horrible disease. And you have to ashamed to choose between these two. >:( Feminism is a utopia. It is human nature to seek what is not there. And as soon as he see this then immediately comes up with a new idea. Women themselves reject the ideology of feminism. It just takes time.Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: BADecker on December 24, 2016, 09:36:46 PM I can't compare those too. It's wrong bcs feminism is ideology but cancer is a horrible disease. And you have to ashamed to choose between these two. >:( Feminism is a utopia. It is human nature to seek what is not there. And as soon as he see this then immediately comes up with a new idea. Women themselves reject the ideology of feminism. It just takes time.Feminism wants equal or better rights for women. Good. Give them the right to work harder and longer hours. I'd be glad to let the women be the robots, and live free off their labors. 8) Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: DimidoffVany on December 24, 2016, 09:43:31 PM I can't compare those too. It's wrong bcs feminism is ideology but cancer is a horrible disease. And you have to ashamed to choose between these two. >:( Feminism is a utopia. It is human nature to seek what is not there. And as soon as he see this then immediately comes up with a new idea. Women themselves reject the ideology of feminism. It just takes time.Feminism wants equal or better rights for women. Good. Give them the right to work harder and longer hours. I'd be glad to let the women be the robots, and live free off their labors. 8) Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: Sithara007 on December 25, 2016, 05:58:24 PM I do not understand what is the purpose of feminism. What do women lack? I somehow think that they themselves do not know why they are fighting. They are just bored and they are not interested in rights, just draws the process of the struggle. People who are inferior always look for excuses. They are unable to compete with others and always want affirmative action and other benefits for them. Examples include African Americans, Hispanics, and radical feminists. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: criptix on December 25, 2016, 06:22:53 PM I do not understand what is the purpose of feminism. What do women lack? I somehow think that they themselves do not know why they are fighting. They are just bored and they are not interested in rights, just draws the process of the struggle. People who are inferior always look for excuses. They are unable to compete with others and always want affirmative action and other benefits for them. Examples include African Americans, Hispanics, and radical feminists. Sounds exactly like the people who whine about feminism, welfare and so on. ;D Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: achow102 on December 25, 2016, 06:59:26 PM How about instead of arguing about the bs wage gap The "BS wage gap" will not exist if the women are capable of producing the quantity and quality, which the men are capable of. There are a lot of women who are better than men in jobs, and they receive higher than average salaries as well. But arguing that women must receive salary at a level equal to that of men, even if the quality and quantity of their output is lower, is against meritocracy. Yep! In the US, women are equal under law. If you get paid less for the same work, sue. Equal output, equal pay. It's not that hard of a concept. nobody wants to lose a job. And if you start to sue the employer, the employer has soured relations and find a way to dismiss such an employee. And the lawyer will take a lot of money Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: BADecker on December 25, 2016, 08:28:45 PM I can't compare those too. It's wrong bcs feminism is ideology but cancer is a horrible disease. And you have to ashamed to choose between these two. >:( Feminism is a utopia. It is human nature to seek what is not there. And as soon as he see this then immediately comes up with a new idea. Women themselves reject the ideology of feminism. It just takes time.Feminism wants equal or better rights for women. Good. Give them the right to work harder and longer hours. I'd be glad to let the women be the robots, and live free off their labors. 8) If men were really nice guys, and if men and women didn't misunderstand each other, women would be happy to be wives, and follow the lead of their husbands. There are always a few people who are rebellious, just as you will always find some extremely great marriages. 8) Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: Xester on December 26, 2016, 04:04:04 PM My thoughts on this is simple I dont want any of the two. Feminism is very one sided movement and is gender biased that is skeptical and discriminates the opposite sex. Cancer is an illness of the body wherein bad cells has won over your god cells and take over your body. If you see they have both dominating specifications, their goal is to win over the other, they are alike. Soon feminism in its extreme will be a cancer in the society a disease like the cancer in ones body.
Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: BADecker on December 26, 2016, 04:29:54 PM My thoughts on this is simple I dont want any of the two. Feminism is very one sided movement and is gender biased that is skeptical and discriminates the opposite sex. Cancer is an illness of the body wherein bad cells has won over your god cells and take over your body. If you see they have both dominating specifications, their goal is to win over the other, they are alike. Soon feminism in its extreme will be a cancer in the society a disease like the cancer in ones body. Often feminism women can be won over by gentle, loving treatment of real men. Such women make great wives. 8) Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: devthedev on December 27, 2016, 03:12:36 AM What low status? Where? Here there are plenty of women in the leading positions and super careers, stop talking like all countries are thrid world muslim countries. There is no more need for feminism in this world, not in the west tho. Add to this the fact that a large number of the presidents and prime ministers around the world are female. A female (Hillary Clinton) was very close to becoming the most powerful person in the world. And these feminists voted for her just because she is a woman and wanted to "break the glass ceiling." I wouldn't mind a woman president, but not one who is ridden and scandals with an utter lack of integrity. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: Sithara007 on December 27, 2016, 08:27:00 AM What low status? Where? Here there are plenty of women in the leading positions and super careers, stop talking like all countries are thrid world muslim countries. There is no more need for feminism in this world, not in the west tho. Add to this the fact that a large number of the presidents and prime ministers around the world are female. A female (Hillary Clinton) was very close to becoming the most powerful person in the world. And these feminists voted for her just because she is a woman and wanted to "break the glass ceiling." I wouldn't mind a woman president, but not one who is ridden and scandals with an utter lack of integrity. I am not in favor of female leaders. From what I am seeing, these leaders lack the skills and vision. A perfect example is that of Angela Merkel in Germany. She has almost singlehandedly destroyed the European civilization. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: BADecker on December 27, 2016, 05:25:12 PM What low status? Where? Here there are plenty of women in the leading positions and super careers, stop talking like all countries are thrid world muslim countries. There is no more need for feminism in this world, not in the west tho. Add to this the fact that a large number of the presidents and prime ministers around the world are female. A female (Hillary Clinton) was very close to becoming the most powerful person in the world. And these feminists voted for her just because she is a woman and wanted to "break the glass ceiling." I wouldn't mind a woman president, but not one who is ridden and scandals with an utter lack of integrity. I am not in favor of female leaders. From what I am seeing, these leaders lack the skills and vision. A perfect example is that of Angela Merkel in Germany. She has almost singlehandedly destroyed the European civilization. It isn't really Merkel. Not all by herself, for sure. Watch this video to see what is going on. Nazi Queen Of England Exposed https://i.ytimg.com/vi/W84577wguSo/hqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=246&h=138&stc=true&jpg444=true&jpgq=90&sp=68&sigh=7AczRoUfcWLD5T9cjwDL8vey9o4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W84577wguSo (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W84577wguSo) Google and Youtube search on "Nazi Queen." 8) Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: Tyrantt on December 28, 2016, 12:08:15 AM What low status? Where? Here there are plenty of women in the leading positions and super careers, stop talking like all countries are thrid world muslim countries. There is no more need for feminism in this world, not in the west tho. Add to this the fact that a large number of the presidents and prime ministers around the world are female. A female (Hillary Clinton) was very close to becoming the most powerful person in the world. Clinton better than Trump? ;D ;D ;D maybe for war, what's wrong with you? I'd rather have a blind monkey with down syndrome as a president than Clinton. I don't even want to comment Merkel. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: Tyrantt on December 28, 2016, 12:19:30 AM What low status? Where? Here there are plenty of women in the leading positions and super careers, stop talking like all countries are thrid world muslim countries. There is no more need for feminism in this world, not in the west tho. Add to this the fact that a large number of the presidents and prime ministers around the world are female. A female (Hillary Clinton) was very close to becoming the most powerful person in the world. And these feminists voted for her just because she is a woman and wanted to "break the glass ceiling." I wouldn't mind a woman president, but not one who is ridden and scandals with an utter lack of integrity. I am not in favor of female leaders. From what I am seeing, these leaders lack the skills and vision. A perfect example is that of Angela Merkel in Germany. She has almost singlehandedly destroyed the European civilization. Well Croatian president and Brazils ex Dilma Rousseff, people weren't that fond of them as much as I know... So far, most of the female president and prime ministers haven't shown something that worth.. :/ Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: Sithara007 on December 28, 2016, 01:27:25 PM Well Croatian president and Brazils ex Dilma Rousseff, people weren't that fond of them as much as I know... So far, most of the female president and prime ministers haven't shown something that worth.. :/ Being a female has its own advantages. A party sometimes projects a female leader as the head of the state, to win over the support from female voters. The problem is that, in many such instances an inexperienced and incompetent female is selected ahead of much better male candidates. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: Heutenamos on December 28, 2016, 06:59:40 PM Feminism is an ideology & Cancer is a disease. The comparison is senseless. Whoever chooses cancer is either mentally ill or is someone with a very harsh past experience and hence supporting his choice over survival. There is no feminism no equality if u die, survival is of paramount importance. However, i am a libertarian, so i would say u r free to chose your ideology over survival or die for something u consider worthy to. But, the comparison has no sense at all.
Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: BADecker on December 28, 2016, 07:59:17 PM Feminism is an ideology & Cancer is a disease. The comparison is senseless. Whoever chooses cancer is either mentally ill or is someone with a very harsh past experience and hence supporting his choice over survival. There is no feminism no equality if u die, survival is of paramount importance. However, i am a libertarian, so i would say u r free to chose your ideology over survival or die for something u consider worthy to. But, the comparison has no sense at all. Feminism is a cancerous ideology, and cancer can be cured through nutrition. Bury the fems without a coffin, so that the worms get all the nutrition they need. 8) Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: miki77miki on December 29, 2016, 12:34:23 AM The main problem with Feminism is that is pits women against men, they are fighting for equality for only women, rather than fighting for equality of the sexes. Now I know everyone will claim "Oh Feminsism is fighting for equality!" Yeah, bullshit in this day and age where men are raped more than women (when including prison rape), in an age where a women will be put higher up on the list for a job or college acception because she's a women, in an age where fathers retain custody of their children in a small percentage of cases but feminsists continue to talk about a fabricated wage gap and trivial things like "manspreading" you know they are not fighting for equality.
Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: Jordan23 on December 29, 2016, 01:37:31 AM Feminism gave women: The right to vote The right to wear just what their male counterparts have been allowed to wear at the beach The right to be free of marital abuse/rape The right to not have to marry Christian pedos The fact that you have to compare it to cancer means you're either a Christian pedo or just ignorant of history. Better to just admit your ignorance of history. Someone can't comprehend. Then you even tried to sound smart at the end. LOL Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: Heutenamos on December 29, 2016, 03:43:42 AM Feminism is an ideology & Cancer is a disease. The comparison is senseless. Whoever chooses cancer is either mentally ill or is someone with a very harsh past experience and hence supporting his choice over survival. There is no feminism no equality if u die, survival is of paramount importance. However, i am a libertarian, so i would say u r free to chose your ideology over survival or die for something u consider worthy to. But, the comparison has no sense at all. Feminism is a cancerous ideology, and cancer can be cured through nutrition. Bury the fems without a coffin, so that the worms get all the nutrition they need. 8) every ideology is cancerous to at least one community/group on the earth. And everyone thinks their ideology is the right deal :-\ yeah sure sure. But it is an undeniable fact that the whole Human evolution turned out to be a cancer to the Earth. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: Sithara007 on December 29, 2016, 12:16:10 PM The main problem with Feminism is that is pits women against men, they are fighting for equality for only women, rather than fighting for equality of the sexes. Now I know everyone will claim "Oh Feminsism is fighting for equality!" Yeah, bullshit in this day and age where men are raped more than women (when including prison rape), in an age where a women will be put higher up on the list for a job or college acception because she's a women, in an age where fathers retain custody of their children in a small percentage of cases but feminsists continue to talk about a fabricated wage gap and trivial things like "manspreading" you know they are not fighting for equality. Feminism has destroyed the traditional family in many of the Western nations. The divorce rates are over the roof, fueled by gold-digger women suing for multi-million dollar alimonies. Marriage is a joke now in the western world. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: coolcoinz on December 29, 2016, 04:38:38 PM I'd rather have feminism, at least I can ignore that, but I can't ignore cancer. I'm all about gender equality. If a woman wants to do a man's job, be my guest. You want to wear pants, be a soldier or provide for the family while your man stays at home with kids? Please do, just don't come crying when you feel tired and dirty or somebody at work made a pass and you feel molested.
Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: BADecker on December 29, 2016, 09:24:08 PM All joking aside, peruse http://naturalnews.com/ to see a whole bunch of ways to stop cancer, and to remain healthy so you never get cancer.
Feminism is one of the things that causes stress in our lives. Stress can cause cancer, but not if you follow the instructions throughout http://naturalnews.com/. BTW, this information is NOT for the seriously feministic people. Why not? Because it will help to straighten out their hormones, and their feminism will disappear. 8) Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: Sithara007 on December 30, 2016, 06:29:05 AM All joking aside, peruse http://naturalnews.com/ to see a whole bunch of ways to stop cancer, and to remain healthy so you never get cancer. Even now physicians are not sure what causes certain types of cancer. And also, no cure exists for third stage and terminal stage cancer. Even second stage cancer survival rate is very low. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: BADecker on December 30, 2016, 12:52:15 PM All joking aside, peruse http://naturalnews.com/ to see a whole bunch of ways to stop cancer, and to remain healthy so you never get cancer. Even now physicians are not sure what causes certain types of cancer. And also, no cure exists for third stage and terminal stage cancer. Even second stage cancer survival rate is very low. Of course the medical will tell you this. If marijuana oil were in use, we wouldn't need doctors, and people would barely ever get sick. The medical would be out of a job, and the big pharmaceutical companies who are poisoning us with legal drugs would shut down for lack of business. 8) Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: tanyao93 on March 21, 2017, 06:55:19 PM Feminism turned into a war of the sexes. I do not like it, I'm against violence and domination. Man and woman are created in order to complement each other and live in harmony with themselves and the world around them.
Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: Sithara007 on March 22, 2017, 01:53:18 AM All joking aside, peruse http://naturalnews.com/ to see a whole bunch of ways to stop cancer, and to remain healthy so you never get cancer. Even now physicians are not sure what causes certain types of cancer. And also, no cure exists for third stage and terminal stage cancer. Even second stage cancer survival rate is very low. Of course the medical will tell you this. If marijuana oil were in use, we wouldn't need doctors, and people would barely ever get sick. The medical would be out of a job, and the big pharmaceutical companies who are poisoning us with legal drugs would shut down for lack of business. 8) Marijuana is useful for reducing the pain during advanced stages of cancer. It is not a cure against cancer. But if the usage of marijuana is allowed, then there will be no takers for the expensive painkillers manufactured by the pharma cartels. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: GreenBits on March 22, 2017, 03:32:27 AM Feminism turned into a war of the sexes. I do not like it, I'm against violence and domination. Man and woman are created in order to complement each other and live in harmony with themselves and the world around them. Agree, but you have to agree women have always been lowest on the totem pole, and it's kind of reasonable that in this day and age, they might be pissed about it. Nothing's perfect, and shit will have to fix over time , but even as a dude, you can't turn a blind eye to how differently we treat females in most societies, versus males. It's really a man's world, and as a dude, I don't completely have a problem with that, it benefits me hugely even as a Black male in America. It is certainly an equality, a complementary pair. But we aren't quite playing a level field with the ladies. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: Mometaskers on March 22, 2017, 04:01:14 AM I'd take feminism and just say to them "Hey, I'm gay, I'm ally!" They'd probably believe that and move on to the next male they're going to assault. ;D
But seriously, what we are seeing today is more like FemiNAZIsm. This is no longer an advocacy to provide women better care and equal opportunities and rights. It has devolved into men shaming and forced effeminization of boys. Not that it's bad if they were not very masculine to begin with but it seems these furies are hell-bent on ridding Earth of every trace of masculinity which they see as manifestation of the hated "Patriarchy". It would have been OK if these are just between adult men and women, let them argue all day. The problem is this is affecting children. Reminded me of this clip I've seen. https://youtu.be/OFpYj0E-yb4 You might say that it's a conservative channel but it's a woman talking about this so there must be a problem. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: Japan_peopleffs on March 25, 2017, 07:12:21 PM I do not see anything wrong with the fact that women tend to become the same personalities and members of society as men. In addition, many of this is fine. All the same, they can never overtake men with physical strength and the ability to have a child. Just do not need to make a war out of it.
Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: Podgor on March 25, 2017, 07:36:56 PM I'd fuck these femists hard to make them feel like a woman again... If they weren's so damn fat and ugly lol.
Feminism is not pro women, it's about hating men. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: olyaru on March 25, 2017, 10:15:21 PM I'd fuck these femists hard to make them feel like a woman again... If they weren's so damn fat and ugly lol. This is the truth. I agree with your words. I do not think that feminism is better from Nazism. Unlike women, men do not make organizations against women, and they do it.Feminism is not pro women, it's about hating men. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: PancherBitCoin on March 25, 2017, 10:21:02 PM If it is fair, I such question unexpectedly. Feminism or cancer. A small choice. But I will say more simply that this community of women is a cancer of the general society. Radical women, the world on a glider will not bring.
Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: Marma Kalari on March 26, 2017, 08:51:15 AM If it is fair, I such question unexpectedly. Feminism or cancer. A small choice. But I will say more simply that this community of women is a cancer of the general society. Radical women, the world on a glider will not bring. I really did not understand what you are trying to tell here ,hope you understand what feminism is,my stand toward it is i really support good causes but i do not support all the dumb causes they try to come up with,i believe in equality rather than any movements,what i find silly with the so called feminist is that they try to argue each and every point without any substance and they think they are always right in what they think and if they fail in a debate they will play the victim card which is quite popular now a days. :DTitle: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: JengoFF_n0 on March 26, 2017, 09:13:13 AM I'd fuck these femists hard to make them feel like a woman again... If they weren's so damn fat and ugly lol. Feminism is not pro women, it's about hating men. The struggle for equal rights and freedom of choice turned into a fight against men. I think the movement of feminism now wants to destroy all men :-\ Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: Sithara007 on March 26, 2017, 01:34:45 PM I'd fuck these femists hard to make them feel like a woman again... If they weren's so damn fat and ugly lol. Feminism is not pro women, it's about hating men. The struggle for equal rights and freedom of choice turned into a fight against men. I think the movement of feminism now wants to destroy all men :-\ Unfortunately, this is what happening right now. Look at the countries where radical feminists are in power, such as Sweden and Norway. The men are treated like second class citizens in these nations. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: Japan_peopleffs on March 26, 2017, 06:49:42 PM A man on average is physically stronger and more intelligent than a woman, if you give the woman the right to make decisions that are not well thought out, then it will not work out quite well. You can play in feminism, but you do not need to make a catastrophe out of it.
Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: bryant.coleman on March 26, 2017, 07:22:58 PM A man on average is physically stronger and more intelligent than a woman, if you give the woman the right to make decisions that are not well thought out, then it will not work out quite well. You can play in feminism, but you do not need to make a catastrophe out of it. Nature made women as the weaker gender, but the feminists and the brain-dead liberal nuts seems to be having a problem in accepting this truth. Is it possible for a woman to win the 100 meters race, if both the genders are allowed to participate? And look at the Nobel price laureates in medicine, science and physics. How many of them are women? Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: squatz1 on March 26, 2017, 07:58:03 PM I never had an issue with the Feminism in which we needed which was giving women the right to vote and pretty much advocating for them to go out in the workplace and get hired more. I'll fully support all of this until the end, as Women should have equal rights when it comes to things like this and society as a whole.
This third wave feminism is something that people should be disgusted of, it's not real feminism and it's not something that Women should be happy about following in the least. This new thing about Women fighting for their rights is just a war on men and everything relating to that. So, Cancer looks wonderful compared to this Tumblr feminism. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: Hazir on March 26, 2017, 08:28:27 PM Nature made women as the weaker gender, but the feminists and the brain-dead liberal nuts seems to be having a problem in accepting this truth. Is it possible for a woman to win the 100 meters race, if both the genders are allowed to participate? And look at the Nobel price laureates in medicine, science and physics. How many of them are women? Let's skip the physical capabilities and difference between men and women, strength or endurance can be enhanced greatly by training or drugs if the women wish to do so. It is still foolish thing to do IMO. Nobel Prize as a mark of greatness of one gender is a bit biased in my opinion. Nobel Price was awarded first time 116 years ago (1901) At that time women wasn't exactly viewed as great scientists nor have access to the same schools as men. This situation continued through first half of the 20th century. Determining value of women's knowledge and scientific contributions by number of Nobel Prize awards is simply not the best way. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: GooCust04 on April 03, 2017, 10:33:53 AM Nature made women as the weaker gender, but the feminists and the brain-dead liberal nuts seems to be having a problem in accepting this truth. Is it possible for a woman to win the 100 meters race, if both the genders are allowed to participate? And look at the Nobel price laureates in medicine, science and physics. How many of them are women? Let's skip the physical capabilities and difference between men and women, strength or endurance can be enhanced greatly by training or drugs if the women wish to do so. It is still foolish thing to do IMO. Nobel Prize as a mark of greatness of one gender is a bit biased in my opinion. Nobel Price was awarded first time 116 years ago (1901) At that time women wasn't exactly viewed as great scientists nor have access to the same schools as men. This situation continued through first half of the 20th century. Determining value of women's knowledge and scientific contributions by number of Nobel Prize awards is simply not the best way. Yes, a woman can manifest in science or in sports, but this is not her strong point. When it starts to go against nature, it can start to break down in the body. A woman should not engage in too exhausting work. Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: yoseph on April 03, 2017, 12:29:20 PM I dont really want to get cancer and i support feminism as long as they ask for same rights and job opportunities and equal salary as men do, there is really nothing wrong with that but when women bare their bodies and are naked all in the name of feminism i thinks its just women wanting be hoes. After revealing their body they then come around and say that women should not be treated as sex objects. What the hell. The feminism movement is as confused as women themselves.
Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: Sithara007 on April 04, 2017, 03:08:43 AM I dont really want to get cancer and i support feminism as long as they ask for same rights and job opportunities and equal salary as men do, there is really nothing wrong with that but when women bare their bodies and are naked all in the name of feminism i thinks its just women wanting be hoes. After revealing their body they then come around and say that women should not be treated as sex objects. What the hell. The feminism movement is as confused as women themselves. The idea behind baring the breasts is that if the men are allowed to go topless, then the women should also be able to do the same. But they are forgetting the important fact that the men has got no boobs (only moobs). ;D Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: erikalui on April 04, 2017, 03:30:23 PM Feminism has been made a joke by women rather than men. Men in any case couldn't or rather did not want to believe or understand feminism but with celebs joining in this movement, they just made it look like some men-hating movement or as a movement that considers them superior or something. The fact of feminism was mainly to imply that woman shouldn't be treated as a weaker gender and given equal opportunities as men in every field but now it's no longer about opportunities but become a superior-inferior competition.
Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: Challenger2015 on April 04, 2017, 04:38:53 PM I dont really want to get cancer and i support feminism as long as they ask for same rights and job opportunities and equal salary as men do, there is really nothing wrong with that but when women bare their bodies and are naked all in the name of feminism i thinks its just women wanting be hoes. After revealing their body they then come around and say that women should not be treated as sex objects. What the hell. The feminism movement is as confused as women themselves. The idea behind baring the breasts is that if the men are allowed to go topless, then the women should also be able to do the same. But they are forgetting the important fact that the men has got no boobs (only moobs). ;D Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: NY-city on April 04, 2017, 07:57:43 PM I dont really want to get cancer and i support feminism as long as they ask for same rights and job opportunities and equal salary as men do, there is really nothing wrong with that but when women bare their bodies and are naked all in the name of feminism i thinks its just women wanting be hoes. After revealing their body they then come around and say that women should not be treated as sex objects. What the hell. The feminism movement is as confused as women themselves. The idea behind baring the breasts is that if the men are allowed to go topless, then the women should also be able to do the same. But they are forgetting the important fact that the men has got no boobs (only moobs). ;D Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: gabmen on April 05, 2017, 02:18:12 PM I dont really want to get cancer and i support feminism as long as they ask for same rights and job opportunities and equal salary as men do, there is really nothing wrong with that but when women bare their bodies and are naked all in the name of feminism i thinks its just women wanting be hoes. After revealing their body they then come around and say that women should not be treated as sex objects. What the hell. The feminism movement is as confused as women themselves. The idea behind baring the breasts is that if the men are allowed to go topless, then the women should also be able to do the same. But they are forgetting the important fact that the men has got no boobs (only moobs). ;D I understand the argument here about feminism and even if i don't fully support what hardcore feminists are fighting for, definitely i'd choose it over cancer. I mean really who would choose cancer over anything? Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: Lieldoryn on April 05, 2017, 03:18:49 PM The result of the survey suggests that most people choose cancer. I don't believe it. As between life and death, to choose death? I am not a supporter of feminism, but I've seen many people who have died from cancer. It's terrible! And feminism is a utopia.
Title: Re: Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer? Post by: JGoRed on April 05, 2017, 09:22:00 PM not to mention women are already equal under law in America. Finally, somebody has come to their senses, nobody seems to realize that (same goes for Racism). Racism and Sexism used to be a problem, but now it seems that certain people just call anybody who doesn't agree with them Racist or Sexist.Hmm.... Now to answer your question, I'm really not sure. It probably all depends on the type of cancer. |
