Which would you rather have, feminism or cancer?

[bryant.coleman]

A man on average is physically stronger and more intelligent than a woman, if you give the woman the right to make decisions that are not well thought out, then it will not work out quite well. You can play in feminism, but you do not need to make a catastrophe out of it.

Nature made women as the weaker gender, but the feminists and the brain-dead liberal nuts seems to be having a problem in accepting this truth. Is it possible for a woman to win the 100 meters race, if both the genders are allowed to participate? And look at the Nobel price laureates in medicine, science and physics. How many of them are women?

[1714674346]

1714674346

[1714674346]

1714674346

[1714674346]

1714674346

[1714674346]

1714674346

[squatz1]

I never had an issue with the Feminism in which we needed which was giving women the right to vote and pretty much advocating for them to go out in the workplace and get hired more. I'll fully support all of this until the end, as Women should have equal rights when it comes to things like this and society as a whole.

This third wave feminism is something that people should be disgusted of, it's not real feminism and it's not something that Women should be happy about following in the least. This new thing about Women fighting for their rights is just a war on men and everything relating to that.

So, Cancer looks wonderful compared to this Tumblr feminism.

[Hazir]

Nature made women as the weaker gender, but the feminists and the brain-dead liberal nuts seems to be having a problem in accepting this truth. Is it possible for a woman to win the 100 meters race, if both the genders are allowed to participate? And look at the Nobel price laureates in medicine, science and physics. How many of them are women?

Let's skip the physical capabilities and difference between men and women, strength or endurance can be enhanced greatly by training or drugs if the women wish to do so.
It is still foolish thing to do IMO.

Nobel Prize as a mark of greatness of one gender is a bit biased in my opinion. Nobel Price was awarded first time 116 years ago (1901)
At that time women wasn't exactly viewed as great scientists nor have access to the same schools as men. This situation continued through first half of the 20th century.
Determining value of women's knowledge and scientific contributions by number of Nobel Prize awards is simply not the best way.

[GooCust04]

Nature made women as the weaker gender, but the feminists and the brain-dead liberal nuts seems to be having a problem in accepting this truth. Is it possible for a woman to win the 100 meters race, if both the genders are allowed to participate? And look at the Nobel price laureates in medicine, science and physics. How many of them are women?

Let's skip the physical capabilities and difference between men and women, strength or endurance can be enhanced greatly by training or drugs if the women wish to do so.
It is still foolish thing to do IMO.

Nobel Prize as a mark of greatness of one gender is a bit biased in my opinion. Nobel Price was awarded first time 116 years ago (1901)
At that time women wasn't exactly viewed as great scientists nor have access to the same schools as men. This situation continued through first half of the 20th century.
Determining value of women's knowledge and scientific contributions by number of Nobel Prize awards is simply not the best way.

Yes, a woman can manifest in science or in sports, but this is not her strong point. When it starts to go against nature, it can start to break down in the body. A woman should not engage in too exhausting work.

[yoseph]

I dont really want to get cancer and i support feminism as long as they ask for same rights and job opportunities and equal salary as men do, there is really nothing wrong with that but when women bare their bodies and are naked all in the name of feminism i thinks its just women wanting be hoes. After revealing their body they then come around and say that women should not be treated as sex objects. What the hell. The feminism movement is as confused as women themselves.

[Sithara007]

I dont really want to get cancer and i support feminism as long as they ask for same rights and job opportunities and equal salary as men do, there is really nothing wrong with that but when women bare their bodies and are naked all in the name of feminism i thinks its just women wanting be hoes. After revealing their body they then come around and say that women should not be treated as sex objects. What the hell. The feminism movement is as confused as women themselves.

The idea behind baring the breasts is that if the men are allowed to go topless, then the women should also be able to do the same. But they are forgetting the important fact that the men has got no boobs (only moobs). 

[erikalui]

Feminism has been made a joke by women rather than men. Men in any case couldn't or rather did not want to believe or understand feminism but with celebs joining in this movement, they just made it look like some men-hating movement or as a movement that considers them superior or something. The fact of feminism was mainly to imply that woman shouldn't be treated as a weaker gender and given equal opportunities as men in every field but now it's no longer about opportunities but become a superior-inferior competition.

[Challenger2015]

I dont really want to get cancer and i support feminism as long as they ask for same rights and job opportunities and equal salary as men do, there is really nothing wrong with that but when women bare their bodies and are naked all in the name of feminism i thinks its just women wanting be hoes. After revealing their body they then come around and say that women should not be treated as sex objects. What the hell. The feminism movement is as confused as women themselves.

The idea behind baring the breasts is that if the men are allowed to go topless, then the women should also be able to do the same. But they are forgetting the important fact that the men has got no boobs (only moobs). 

If all women to walk with bare chest it will lead to the fact that their Breasts will cease to arouse men and it is primarily affect women. Perhaps they do not understand. And I choose feminism. Any woman can agree, but with cancer no.

[NY-city]

I dont really want to get cancer and i support feminism as long as they ask for same rights and job opportunities and equal salary as men do, there is really nothing wrong with that but when women bare their bodies and are naked all in the name of feminism i thinks its just women wanting be hoes. After revealing their body they then come around and say that women should not be treated as sex objects. What the hell. The feminism movement is as confused as women themselves.

The idea behind baring the breasts is that if the men are allowed to go topless, then the women should also be able to do the same. But they are forgetting the important fact that the men has got no boobs (only moobs). 

If all women to walk with bare chest it will lead to the fact that their Breasts will cease to arouse men and it is primarily affect women. Perhaps they do not understand. And I choose feminism. Any woman can agree, but with cancer no.

If these women defended only the rights that have common sense, then it is understandable, he many of their theses are generally directed against the peasants. What then is the difference between men and women.

[gabmen]

I dont really want to get cancer and i support feminism as long as they ask for same rights and job opportunities and equal salary as men do, there is really nothing wrong with that but when women bare their bodies and are naked all in the name of feminism i thinks its just women wanting be hoes. After revealing their body they then come around and say that women should not be treated as sex objects. What the hell. The feminism movement is as confused as women themselves.

The idea behind baring the breasts is that if the men are allowed to go topless, then the women should also be able to do the same. But they are forgetting the important fact that the men has got no boobs (only moobs). 

If all women to walk with bare chest it will lead to the fact that their Breasts will cease to arouse men and it is primarily affect women. Perhaps they do not understand. And I choose feminism. Any woman can agree, but with cancer no.

If these women defended only the rights that have common sense, then it is understandable, he many of their theses are generally directed against the peasants. What then is the difference between men and women.

I understand the argument here about feminism and even if i don't fully support what hardcore feminists are fighting for, definitely i'd choose it over cancer. I mean really who would choose cancer over anything?

[Lieldoryn]

The result of the survey suggests that most people choose cancer. I don't believe it. As between life and death, to choose death? I am not a supporter of feminism, but I've seen many people who have died from cancer. It's terrible! And feminism is a utopia.

[JGoRed]

not to mention women are already equal under law in America.

Finally, somebody has come to their senses, nobody seems to realize that (same goes for Racism). Racism and Sexism used to be a problem, but now it seems that certain people just call anybody who doesn't agree with them Racist or Sexist.

Hmm.... Now to answer your question, I'm really not sure. It probably all depends on the type of cancer.