Bitcoin Forum

🤔🤔🤔

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4006863.0

Here you go ^^^^^^^^^

Shame on you man/woman. I had you on ignore and now I see that you are trolling me. lol.

Well, if you continually cry wolf, the villagers will soon stop listening.



I would say starting yet another thread crying about your trust rating easily counts.



Not really. See the quote from theymos below. If you continue to advertise a shady business, you are going to get tagged as being shady. No two ways about it.

In general is not OK to use DT power for personal use, if you post a rating about me, it shouldn't tag me as scammer by default. if you are on DT and use  your power to bully me, that is abuse. you don't deserve to hold that power if you are the only one capable of removing it, that could lead to abuse. if DT members are abusing their position and nobody is stopping them, it could lead to more bullying and more abuse.

Now I'm asking you, isn't this abuse if marlboroza is the only person who could dictate his terms and inflict damage to my reputation? if DT is not moderated, who would stop them from abusing their power? these threads is not crying, I'm posting them to inform you of DT members trying to have a personal use of their power.

Except you've been tagged by three different members of DT. When are you going to realize that you're damaging your reputation yourself?

Reason for tagging me?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=806776

Now look at my 3 threads.

Bump. if I'm trolling you should report my posts to moderators and not tag me if I'm not a scammer. tagging me for trolling is equal of deciding on behalf of moderators, I should be reported for trolling and tagging me for it is abuse of DT power.

If you believe that I'm a troll why don't you report me? if you have reported me and moderators haven't dealt with me, tagging me is violating the forum rules, if you are not a staff, you shouldn't enforce your own rules and make them as a scammer tag on me by default. I'm reporting you for abusing your power.

Source ?
Report people who tagged you to moderators, since they "violate" the forum rules.  ::)
Easy peasy, problem solved !

https://archive.fo/NdzTa#selection-1985.0-1985.204

Quoted.


Monkey you can't buy my trust.

@yogg, this reminded me of something....you know.

Read marlboroza tag on me, there is no point in reporting him to moderators as trust is not moderated, all I can do is to point it out for people to see.

Tagging me for trolling is abuse of power.


Here he is calling me monkey like he is better than me, this member doesn't deserve to hold any power, he is calling me monkey and he is on DT2. this is the standard of dealing with anybody who disagrees with them. a.k.a abuse of power. he is not tagging me for scamming people, he just wants to hold his power over me saying that I'm wrong and he is right, he could say that in a post and not by tagging me red as a scammer.

I'm still waiting for him to tell me why he'd tagged me for trolling and why he didn't report me to moderators. because he thinks that he is a staff member. if DT members are staff, then we have a problem, because a few of them are rogue individuals abusing their power.

Read this back to yourself. Now read it back again. Now read it back again, but really slowly this time.

Basically you are saying that using the trust system (which you finally agree isn't moderated) in a way you don't like is abuse, therefore implying it is moderated. Your logic is paradoxical. Your argument is nonsense.

Yogg suggested to me that I should report marlboroza to moderators for leaving me red tag. moderator's job is not moderating the trust system. if I'm opening a thread about abuse, it's merely to point out abuse of power to the authorities a.k.a DT1 members and especially admins.

Ok, well consider it fully "pointed out". Everyone here has taken note of it being pointed out. You can now lock this thread and all your other pointless threads.

You're the one claiming that tagging you violates forum rules:


Have you PMed the DT1 members yet?

Thanks suchmoon, this is what I meant.
Go ahead, make a fuzz and PM everyone about marlboroza's feedback on your account. ::)

Given the amount of contradictions from OP in this thread, I have to agree this is an interesting study case for the infinite monkey theorem (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_monkey_theorem) ...

Go yogg. infinite monkey theorem. have more positive trust without reference and come here to defend your fellow slaves.


Translation:
Digaran, bend over.

NEVER.

So have you PMed the DT1 members yet?

No.I suppose he is busy stalking user profiles and seeking Vod for some enlightenment. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4146844.0)

Bothering them for this pitty abuse of power? not yet, I'm waiting to see if you guys could actually listen to any reason. or if you want to have it your way, your words against mine. I'm not afraid of anybody, if I see abuse, I'll point it out.


I suppose, I got to you eh? look at your green trust with no reference.

I'm afraid to say that ten times out of ten, you will lose that argument.

people are starting to ignore Diagrams side of anything... he might give up when he gets back on his meds

Not really.I'm just a mere case of a green trust with no reference.Look around, you might as well establish a pattern of dark green trusted members without any references.Do you just fancy it because its given by 'Vod me Lord' ? You shouldn't.

Digaran is leaving:


Or maybe not.

I'm still waiting for marlboro to defend himself. I have accused him of abuse of DT power, abuse of trust system and he hasn't come here to defend himself, maybe because he thinks that he is immune? are DT members immune and could they do whatever they want with their power?

Marlboroza doesn't need to defend himself as obviously you deserve the red tag, from what I remember he even removed his tag as he said that you shouldn't be taken seriously. Also you still haven't replied to my posts in your own thread (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3560707.msg36478853#msg36478853) where you blamed that DT members are abusing their power in order to join long term campaigns. If you have any proof against what you are accusing them then there is no need for theymos to defend you. You feel like they are ganging up against you but you are obviously trolling a lot of members here in the forum.

You can wait still...
What's at stake for him if he doesn't defend himself against you ? That won't change what we think of marlboroza ...

yes

Really! do you think so? How would you explain this tag?


First time I have experienced something which could easily be addressed in a post but you had to tag me to get my attention. Do you even know how the trust system works?

- I don't see anything wrong has been said here.

I see you have double standard in understanding. When thing goes against you then you come up with one theory and when thing goes in your favour then you come up with another theory.

Possible mental illness  :-\

Theory of Everything again.

I quoted in your thread including the fifth amendment but a mod deleted my post. if you are trying to blackmail people you should read them their rights first. if I have tagged people and asked them to do something, I have done it so that nobody includes me into DT2, I don't want to be a slave. but even if I was a DT2 member, I haven't asked anything for my own gain. even if you could call me an extortionist, I have tried to extort people for the good of forum. I am transparent.

I know marbloro the best cigar in the world. He and his wife are part of a swingers group and we have made group sex with each other many times. What he doesn't know is that he will die of AIDS or Siphilises. He likes to be buttfucked many times and uses vaseline almost always.

Digaran, you continue to make these threads when we have laid out a very effective and clear plan of action for you to take if you are truly interested in making any changes within the DT network. I have a simply question; do you agree with any negative rating currently standing on your account? Do you understand why your actions have been perceived in a manner that is untrustworthy? You can continue to throw peas from your feeding chair like a toddler, or you can stand up with your back straight like a man and approach the problem with confidence, rationale and humility. If you set out to fix the problems of the world, clean your room first. Look in the mirror, there are changes that need to happen within yourself. Do you believe creating these threads is helping your situation? You are now just a fart in the wind amongst the other thousands of leeches and shitposters that cry around Meta and Reputation about their ratings. It is sad that this is how you are going to spend the rest of your days around the forum.

If you disagree with the ratings, and the member does not wish to remove it, then your only course of action is to contact their DT inclusion.

Nah, it was best cigar, not any more.
Logically, we are part of the same swinger group.
It hurts without vasaline.

https://i.imgur.com/trBtAF6.png

Better you than someone with dick.

Marlboroza is refusing to answer my questions, why did he tag me for trolling and why didn't he report my posts to moderators if he really believes that they are trolling posts? I have never trolled anybody, what I have said are criticism and not trolling. yet he is silent and refuses to stand by his actions.

The question "Why did he tag me for trolling?", answers itself. If a user feels that your trolling deserves a negative trust, then a negative trust you will receive from that user. There are no rules about trust moderation, so why do you feel entitled to an explanation in the first place?

"This user continues to spread lies, harassing forum members, DT and moderators/stuff, running very shady law practice service which consist of trolling DT members and spreading lies all over the forum." That should answer the question of why they have tagged you with negative trust. Reporting a "troll" post to moderators will do nothing. Suggesting that as a course of action tells me that you have never even read through the moderation policy that is publicly available and stickied.

Marlboroza has answered your questions, but even if they didn't they are under no obligation to do so. You are acting entitled and are wishing the rules, moderation policy and DT inclusions were based around yourself. This is not going to happen.

One by one, tell me why do you think my posts are trolling? if I say that people shouldn't leave positive trust with no reference, that is not trolling that is my personal opinion. I have never tagged anybody for not doing their jobs. if I have criticized a moderator that is not trolling.

Btw, what is stuff? did he mean staff?
I have the right to defend other people if it is within reason, I haven't yet defended anybody, so how does he know that my practice is shady? I had my own terms in exchange of defending wrongfully red tagged people. I haven't said which red tag was wrong yet. only they have tagged me to harass me and prevent me from defending others.

Did anybody pay me? did I run with people's money? I haven't started to defend anybody yet, how do you know if that is a shady practice? I haven't said which tag is illegit. only my own tags are illegit and a sort of harassment.

DT members shouldn't tag people just because they don't trust them. I haven't scammed anybody. I haven't cheated in bounties. tagging me red after I have decided to defend people against abuse of power is abuse of power.

No. I have no reason to waste hours of my time explaining to you why your behavior is perceived the way it is. I suggest a therapist for something like that; I hear they are helpful for introspection and self-reflection of this manner.


Great, and it is the personal opinion of others that your posts make you a troll and untrustworthy.


Okay?


Yes, and most newbies asking for loans don't receive them, so how does anybody know they won't repay them?


It's called the Trust system, you do realize that, right? Thank you for your opinion, but it is irrelevant what you believe should and shouldn't happen when the system is based upon subjective personal criteria.


No, it is not. It doesn't matter if you've scammer anybody. There are tons of high ranking reputable members that haven't scammed anybody and they have a negative feedback. Scamming is not the sole-purpose or intention of the marketplace feedback system, nor is it the only criteria that it is contingent upon.

Then such a person shouldn't hold any power over others. just like marlboroza, he is refusing to comment here, he is irresponsible and is using his DT power to harass me.

That post seems like pretty solid evidence to me that you are not even reading the replies within your own thread. If I were them and knew this to be true, then I wouldn't waste time explaining myself to a brick wall, either. Enjoy throwing your tantrum in the corner; whenever you are ready to come back and act like a person we will all be here waiting.

Who is we here? you mean the usual cartel?

This is abuse of power, you keep telling yourself that you are better than others. waiting here like you own this place. ;)

You admit it yourself:

---

Are you trying to be funny, trying to level us, or are you just incorrigibly contradictory?

Go shitpost with your signature elsewhere man. did you tag me for trolling? funny how you chipmixer criminals are saying the same thing. I mean there is not a single reputable member with no signature here to tell me that whatever I say is wrong. fucking cartels man. ;)

That is for after I got tagged. don't be a shitposter. you are here to shitpost just like when you were on another thread.
EDIT:
How is this relevant? I have started trolling after getting tagged for trolling.

That is not relevant.

Funny how you try to deflect your lies by resorting to absurd ad-hominem attacks.

Great: a signature affects the text of what one says. Clearly, because one has a signature anything they post must be absolutely disregarded because there is no way that it is true. Every single post from a user that has a signature must be a shitpost therefore we can ignore all their posts. QED.

I only applied this signature 2 days ago, and I was telling him long before that that he is an idiot and his posts make zero sense. He didn't listen to me then either.

He's clutching at straws because he knows he is wrong.

What now? who said anything about you? maybe you forgot to post with another account?

Marlboroza still refuses to comment about the matter, what an irresponsible person!
Don hilary doesn't have the balls to tag me himself, he has his slave to tag me!

You should think about what you're posting before you do it.

---

Who the fuck is Don hilary?

Marlboroza's master.

I think you are wrong , here is the real Don Hilary, she cures internal disorders  ;D

https://i.imgur.com/BAN8HxF.png

Proofs: it's a "she" so must be Lauda's alt, and medically-inclined so definitely The Pharmacist's alt too.

Bump. marlboroza is not here yet other than responding to other people on this topic. such an irresponsible DT2 member.

Note that don hilary and The Pharmacist have already said that I don't deserve to get tagged, yet these 3 people: actmyname, suchmoon and marlboroza are not listening to reputable members and are doing their own jobs at ruining my reputation.

Note again, it's funny how o_e_l_e_o thinks that he/she is reputable member, because he/she thinks that when he had no signature on, I should've had listened to him.

I see.

So then, for someone's opinion to be valid, they must:
have no signature
be reputable, according to you
not be part of the cartel which is defined by you

---

::)

Seems like a lot of this is based on whether you want to dismiss someone or not.

Seems quite responsible to me, given how it went after marlboroza responded to you after the first neg. Not feeding the troll. Don't worry, you won't starve, I'm feeling charitable.

I apologize if I have offended you. tell me what can I do to make this right?

I think if you go away and don't come back, that will do it.
Or is it that you should come back every day just to bump your pointless threads ? I'm not quite sure.

What are you trying to achieve here ? Do yourself a favor and go make something more productive with your time.

The "cartel" appears to be everyone on the board except him at this point.

---

You asked for someone without a signature to tell you that you are wrong. I gave you exactly that, so you changed your arbitrary goalposts to dismiss it. I've said it before - you argue like a flat Earther.

Glad to see no one is buying your fake remorse.

Where did I say that? I think you deserve everything you got due to your behaviour. If you had changed your ways I would have asked the users to remove it but you didn't. The trolling and stupidity just got worse even after Marl removed your original negative.

A father of 2? kids should think about his own children first.

Well it seems like a reasonable time to bring up someones kids in this situation..  /sarcasm  ::)

You wouldn't be deliberately attempting to elicit an emotional/angry response from someone here, would you? .. which I believe there is another name for on the internet, when people do this type of thing on a forum, wtf is that called again?   Is it a mole? a bowl? a roll?  I'm pretty sure it sounds something like this  ??? bah, I give up...

Yes. Do that.


"hole" comes to mind, one type of backside hole in particular.

Although I assumed digaran was referring to himself there.

Suchmoon said that he is feeling charitable, which I don't know what he meant by that, maybe he was trying to donate money I assume? therefore I said that he should think about his children first, they come first.

whoosh

Souls must be fed. Wait, no... that's not right. What is it again?

https://i.imgur.com/9nohQh4.jpg



Bowls. Bowls must have food.

Vaginas also need to be fed by sperms. ;)

Why not lock this thread as it does not have any sense now and is derailing to dangerous personal vendettas with vaginas and shit. I don't see any sense in keeping the thread alive. I am pro to good communication between members trying to resolve their problems with each other but this thread is everything but that. Friendly advice , close the thread and move on , life is not only Bitcointalk.

Do not confuse my jokes with my reputation, I will not stop until I can clear my name.

Good luck with that though, you will need lots but lots of it.

1. No, no they don't. Unless your a third world fkwit who thinks raping is ok.

2. Constantly trash-talking won't help you clear your name, or anyone's for that matter.

Just wait a little IMO, then ask those who have tagged you to remove their negative trust. But who am I to say anything....

Now I'm rapist? what you are saying is that only third world people have a dick? ;)
EDIT: you could always use condom. my advice.

---

Problem is that they are harassing me.
Tell me once again, who are you anyways?

Well... that pretty much destroys your own "cartel" argument... if this imaginary DT cartel that you keep banging on about did actually exist, shouldn't they ALL be working together? ??? ::)

Or... is it a "cartel" of 3? :P

I'm no one lol.

My point wasn't to call you a rapist. It's that just because you have a dick doesn't mean you have to find a woman to put it into, with or without her consent. It's called decency, but let's leave this topic, shall we?🤔

Here to bump this topic, looks like I was right, marlboroza is trying to guide scammers on how to get rid of negative trust he has left on them properly.
Here you could see (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4593750.0) how he locked the thread immediately after I posted there.
Is this why hilariousandco included this trust abuser on DT2? to give a free pass to big time scammers while they have tagged me left and right without me having any power in this forum? who is giving a free pass to scammers now me or marlboroza?
Where are the usual shills to defend these trust abusers now?

If only there was someone who could investigate this and determine if there was any actual abuse taking place. We'll never know.

In case if you forgot your glasses again, this is the evidence. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4593750.0) marlboroza is asking scammers to delete the evidence of scamming in a topic and as well on his signature, marlboroza is a DT2 member who has been on the red tagging business for 2 months now, he is asking SCAMMERS to remove any evidence of their scamming attempts and then PM him so that he could remove their red tags in order to give them a free pass to continue advertising for other scam ICOs. note that he is a DT2 member and his feedback is trusted by default.

I think since hilariousandco is behind marlboroza nobody could man up and tag this trust abuser, like people are pussies when they are against some powerful individuals.

EDIT: they just deleted my post there, I'm reporting the PM to admin.

I think you made this up. I don't see anything about allowing to advertise other scams.

Follow these steps:

1)Delete the evidence of advertising for ICO scammers.
2)Remove the evidence of advertising for ICO scammers on different social medias.
3)When you are done making your self look legit and not guilty of advertising for scammers, PM me so that I could remove my red tags on your profiles just to give you a free pass and clean accounts to then join other scammy bounties and advertise for them. rinse and repeat.

Suchmoon I think you are trying to kiss Don's ass here. pff no wonder you removed your counter feedbacks on Gleb's alts so fast, such a pussy.

I'm not quite sure how you managed to turn:
[/quote]

into:

That's a fairly long bow to draw... ::)


Also, your "logic" is totally flawed (no surprises there)... if we end up in "rinse and repeat", then there is no ''free pass". As soon as they start joining/advertising other scammy ICOs, they'll get tagged again. How exactly is that a "free pass" ???

In before "basic logic is not applicable because you received positive trust from marlboroza therefore you are just defending your master".

There is nothing to discuss in that topic.
Oh, that's why I have 1+ good report.

---

Anyway, back to the real world:
Look at this.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1855414 http://prntscr.com/k2glt1

Tagged them for advertising this scam (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4578762.0), they removed all advertising material for that scam and now they are advertising ponzi scam (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3811919.0).

Honestly, I can't believe this.

edit didn't see they are advertising ponzi before  :-[

Excuse me, but who are the judges? Who decided that this project https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4516168.0 is fraudulent? Take the trouble to give proof to your statements. And since I have fulfilled the conditions specified by you, I expect from you the removal of the negative trust.

Maybe digaran can explain?

Well, you really bother to explain how the pyramid differs from the lottery?  A lottery for your highest opinion scam? If not, why Ponzi is a scam? Do you have evidence or not?

Difference between investment fraud and lottery?

Forgive you really do not understand the question?

Nop

You write that I am advertising the Ponzi scam what evidence do you have that this project is a scam?

I'm sorry to break up your ladder orgy. Here is some recreational reading for you:

https://www.sec.gov/fast-answers/answersponzihtm.html

Thank you. It is very kind of you. Then the lottery is a kind of fraud, because the winnings are taken by people at the expense of other people. In the rules of the Ponzi project it is written that this is a game and that it is a pyramid. Whom does the project deceive?

No, because the payments will not be exclusively from new investors (which don't exist in a lottery since it is gambling). If you are going create this kind of false equivalence then you can say that any type of gambling is a ponzi scheme.

(And if you want to extrapolate it further, any company is a ponzi scheme)

And just like you, people may not fully understand what a Ponzi scheme is and give them money without understanding the insane risks involved--that's why Ponzis are illegal in my country.

Only on bitcointalk will you find people openly advertising Ponzis as "HYIPs" or some other form of investment schemes.  It's dishonest and people fall for it and lose their money as a result.  Lotteries advertise exactly what they are, and they're also regulated by the government.  These Ponzis here have zero controls and are outright scams.

You have correctly understood my idea, and you perfectly understand that I am right. The lottery sells tickets, you can say it is looking for investors, the pyramid sells tokens. What's the Difference? The win in both cases is for the few who participated in both experiments. Is not it?

Those who "invest" expecting 5% daily:

https://meem.link/i/a/7dunWD.jpg
Edited 2020-11-29 to fix a broken image

I don't know what "firest" means but it can't be anything good.


Odds (probability of winning) is typically known in lotteries and other legitimate forms of gambling. What are the odds of winning in a ponzi scheme?

Forgive me, are these people weak-minded? They can not read? Why do you think that no one knows what a pyramid is?

Since gambling is not prohibited in this forum, and the pyramid is the diversity of gambling, the respected marlboroza can not call it a scam and paint me a trust. :)

Read the rules, link in my sig. Some hints for you: don't double-post, trust system != forum rules.

You still didn't answer what is the probability of winning in a ponzi scheme.

In my humble opinion, more people can win in the pyramid than in the lottery. The whole experience of the pyramids proves this. I can agree, (what else can I do?) That they will lose about 80%, but still it is less than in lotteries. Plus, in the rules it is clearly written that the game Ponzi is a pyramid. All is honest and there is no deceit.

Your opinion is factually wrong. Provided that the ponzi provider doesn't run away and doesn't take any fees, you're looking at a zero-sum game. All the money passes from person to person.

There are only more winners than lowers when you have one person lose a LOT.

I understand that The Pharmacist in the pharmacy is apparently not the right medicine given to the brain so he peed the trust further. Sorry, I thought you (The Pharmacist)  had one extra chromosome, now I understand that there are two of them. :)

Since before you write your post you could not fully understand the rules of Ponzi where it is directly written that they refuse to own a smart contract and as a result can not escape with the money of depositors, then to refute your error does not make sense to me.
"Key event in the industry of crypto-currencies
⚠️ 25.05.18, there was a key event in the industry of crypto-currencies.
👁 The administration of the Ponzi Trust project, as it was announced, has activated the functions of "giving up ownership": both on the Ponzi token and on the Ponzi Trust game. The game finally and irrevocably became the first, universal, common to all mankind law in a blockchain with the ability to make a profit.💰
🔮 Perhaps not everyone is fully aware of what happened. Like many in 2009 - did not understand what will result in the appearance of bitcoin.
🔀 References to "retirement" transactions: 👇🏻
Transaction №1
Transaction №2"
https://ponzitrust.com/en/news/

Actually all people can lose money. Lets say there are only 2 depositors(lets call them D1 and D2) and 0% fee:

D1) invest 1$
D2) invest 1$
D1) receive 2$
D1) reinvest 2$
D2) receive 2$
D2) reinvest 2$

Both depositors are now waiting for 4$ while there is only 2$ in the "game".

See? Everyone loses, fee is irrelevant.

To my regret, you are not right, dear marlboroza. One of these two investors takes the entire bank. That is, he will take 2 dollars and will receive a profit of 100%. The second will lose. If you do me a favor and get acquainted with the project, then I will not have to explain simple things.

And if they reinvest?
What if first "donor" is waiting for $8? 8 people will lose money. What if they win and reinvest 8$? 16 "donors" will lose money. And so on. It seems that you don't understand how ponzi works or you are just playing dumb.

Do you really think that all who enter their tokens into the game do not understand that the prize goes to a smaller part of the participants? All the players, judging by telegram chat, are well aware of this. People when they come to play in a casino are they also sure that everyone who has entered will necessarily win? The forum is actively advertising ICO gambling https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3408613 why you do not paint trusts there? How is gambling advertising different from advertising a pyramid? Sorry for my english.

Tell me, dear, and the pension fund in your country is the Pyramid?
You say he is regulated by the state. What is or who represents the state?
Who can you trust more, the prime minister with his inferences in his head or a smart contract?

That doesn't answer the question. The chance of winning this week's Powerball is roughly 1 in 292 million. I can make a decision to buy or not to buy the lottery ticket based on that. Ponzi participants have no such information and can't make an informed decision. Ponzi is not a lottery.

Well, if you are satisfied with this, then the chance to pick up the ponies in all players is the same. Since no one can forbid you to go out on any day after 100 hours of being in the game. Consequently, your chance of losing your deposit depends only on your own greed. And not from the deception of the administration of the game.

No, it depends on roping in more people to get scammed. Otherwise you wouldn't be here whining about it, would you?

Well, about whining is an easy exaggeration. And not listening to the arguments of his opponent, citing the patterns of his thinking as an example, one can only demonstrate the narrowness of his mind.

It's a game !!!!
A game !!! - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1gsviIGjYYM&frags=pl%2Cwn
This is not your future.
This is a game on the blockchain. A smart-contract can not be bought. But you - I'm not sure.
Mutual aid fund - can you hear of this?
Dollar is a pyramid, let's close all those who accept dollars.
Bitcoin is a pyramid? Was 20k - became 6k. People lost their savings. What else is so volatile in the world? All those who promoted BCC - did they mark the trust?

And I also want your respected investor advocates to ask what is the difference between margin trading on the exchange from the pyramid?

I have listened to your arguments and they're shit.

Ponzi scheme is not a lottery. Nor is it comparable in any way to casino gambling, Bitcoin trading, stock market, or any other fallacious arguments you would like to make. Also double-posting with your alts is still a rule violation. Stop.

To each his own.

Lotteries (and any gambling site) DO NOT use terms like:
Invest
Interest
Earnings

They also don't have fucking Ponzi right in the name.  You are trying to lure in investors in a Ponzi.  You are not asking for gamblers.

I'm not sure where your ANN thread is right now but I might have a look because there is a pretty good chance it belongs in the gambling>investor based games and rounds which will help keep it out of public view!!!!

Edit: my odds of winning in traditional gambling are not affected by the position in which I enter the event unlike ponzi shitcunt schemes.

I understand that legendary thinking is tied to the most accessible to his understanding of the facts. But it was not worth it to bother yourself and strain the last gyrus.

I understand that ponzi promoters just want to scam people out of their money.  I have no fucking idea what your reply means though.  I do agree it wasn't much of a strain to figure out you are running a Ponzi LOL

I carefully examined the arguments of my respected opponents and was able to draw a conclusion from our discussion:
1. My opponents are the very people who support the pyramidal structure created on the forum which contributes to their considerable enrichment and creates unequal conditions for other participants of the forum.
2. These people are using their best efforts to substitute common sense and prove that free and educated participants of the crypto-currency market are not able to do an elementary analysis after reading on the site of the Ponzi game the rules in which it is openly declared about its pyramidal structure. And make a simple conclusion for yourself that in this game you can lose your money, as in other and in 99% of games that mankind invented for the entire period of its existence. Where some win leaving opponents to be losers.
3. Gambling is an integral part of the life of society and the right of every person. Gambling not prohibited by the rules controlled by greedy minority of the forum is well advertised and pumped out of gullible players profit.
4. Realizing their innate needs for unlimited power over others, these people ignoring common sense continue to defend their theory of the "stupid investor", which they are called upon by higher forces to protect from projects with a pyramidal structure. Themselves being in fact part of the pyramid forum.
5. Perfectly understanding that the time of my respected opponents has money during this time that I take from them my humble opinion, they could snatch a piece of themselves fatter using all the privileges given to them by the pyramidal structure of the forum. I allow myself to wish them luck in their further hopeless business the meaning of which is the struggle against the pyramids, that is with ourselves. Sorry for my English.

Ignoring the abundant fallacies of your rambling post for a minute, if you're so adamant that the "educated participants" are fully aware of what they're getting into then you surely wouldn't mind them reading your trust ratings too. So what it is exactly that you're still complaining about?

In my post there is no complaint. In it, a statement of the fact of insincerity of my opponents, who themselves benefit from the pyramidal structure of the forum and try to catch their opponents in this.

Let me say a few words in defense of Ponzi.

1. We are not trying to lure investors, we are into trying to lure players. But to play the game, you need to have chips and make a contribution into the game thise chips.
2. When we openly say that we use the Ponzi scheme - this is not fraud, fraud is when the Ponzi scheme is disguised as some far-fetched highly profitable activity.
3. Nobody has done this before us, and so your brain can not cope with it yet.
4. We honestly say that the game is based on the Ponzi scheme, you want to play - play, do not want to - do not play.

I'll tell you more - every bank is a Ponzi scheme, every social and pension program. Just think over it.

Marlboroza is trying to help scammers. here is the evidence: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4598987.0 he should be excluded from DT2 unless his sponsor DT1 agrees with him, in that case both of them should get kicked out of DT, unless theymos agrees with their actions, in that case do not trust him. however I doubt him agreeing with such behavior.

What are you on about?

This is pertaining to those that are participating in scam ICO signature campaigns. I don't see a problem with marlboroza removing the tag once they stop. Unless you believe that all past participants of campaigns in which the promoted product was a scam should be tagged indefinitely.

Thanks for pointing again which ICO's are scam, i appreciate it.

If you find any other scam ongoing ICO/IPO don't hesitate to send me PM/post it in that topic/create topic in scam accusation and point it to DT members.

Bump, marlboroza is helping scammers to get away with promoting scam ICOs and he has tagged me when I tried to help people. this DT2 member is directly moderating the trust system by tagging or removing the red tags on people.
I still have a red trust from marlboroza by offering a service which has nothing to do with anybody other than me and a possible client.
I have offered a service with clear and transparent terms, I didn't ask for money for doing nothing, I asked for money in exchange for my time spent on reputation cases, tell me where is the thing that could be considered untrustworthy?
Ignore me and someday you'll be ignored when you face the same situation.

Where? He is not helping scammers to get away. The correct word would be: Giving users a second chance.

Need I remind you, he did the same for you. He gave you a second chance, you fucked it up. Do people have to repeat the same thing to make you understand what is really going on? Even if you changed your terms, you started harassing every single DT member, be it marlboroza, be it suchmoon, be it actmyname, Vod, OgNasty, hilariousandco and not to mention theymos.

Read marlboroza's tag on you again:

He's still running around the forum lying.  He's has learned nothing and IMO is incapable of learning anything at this point.  He simply makes stuff up to suit his agenda.

Just a couple of days ago he claimed he could talk to the admin and get a reconsideration for banned users.  Maybe trying to start an unbanning service scamming users out of BTC who are desperate to get their accounts back.  He could be on telegram roping in desperate banned bounty hunters as we speak!

He doesn't need to ask for money on the forum he probably gets a PM or sends them a PM and sends them to telegram, collects the coin and calls it a day, no one on BTCT is any the wiser.

Of course the backpedaling starts immediately which is 100% typical of digaran. 

Need I remind you that I'm not a garbage poster hunting for bounties to need a second chance. you look up to DT members as sort of an authority while they are humans, totally random human beings only in a position of default trust list and they are abusing other people. I will speak out against any fucking tyranny whenever I see it. they are deceiving, manipulating and earning trust and money, not to mention that they are corrupt.


I'm not harassing anybody here, I'm being harassed by them. what I am doing is questioning the legitimacy of their positive and negative trust feedbacks, if people claim that trust system is decentralized and unmoderated, I'm calling it bullshit because it's not.
We all know that marlboroza got on DT2 after he tagged me for the first time and after he removed the tag he got worried that he might lose his status and tagged me again after I PMed him to ask for help after suchmoon tagged me. so yes I don't believe he is trying to help people rather saying who is scammer and untrustworthy and who is not.

He is not in any position to tag people and tell them what to do in order to get rid of the red trust, this could be the start of a long con being played by him. first he would start tagging ICO scammers and bounty hunters with a promise of removing the tags after they have deleted all the evidence to send a message to other scammers, next time when they see him near their scam ICOs they might even submit to whatever he asks from them.


I don't have Telegram, you will never find a Telegram account associated with me. need I to remind you again what kind of a hypocrite you are?
 

Marlboroza, if you ever decide to scam - start with digaran. This would be a "boy who cried DT abuse too many times" situation so nobody would believe him.

Seeing as you're a lying sack of shit we have only your untrustworthy word that you don't have telegram (although lots of additional methods exist outside of BCTC and telegram).  How could we possibly prove or even believe that.


Yes please do I would love to hear about my supposed hypocrisy, since it comes from your deluded brain I would love to read some nice fiction!

Hey btw how is the -64 treating you, lol fucking simpleton!


When you literally make stuff up about people and post it all over the fucking forum most normal people consider that harassing.  Of course you lack simple common sense skills so it isn't a surprise you can't understand this like the rest of the world!

;D

::)

:-\

:o

Ok, that's it. You crossed the line with last one.

You're a garbage poster. You post random shit most of the time.  ;)

And about me looking up to DT members, I might look up to a few members(regardless if they are in DT or not), and there's nothing wrong with it. Just so you know, I disagree with a lot of DT members, and their tags, and that doesn't change anything. Not everyone wants to abuse their power here, and  that trust system doesn't affect anybody IRL. They don't get money by giving trust. That is a wild accusation without ANY proof. And before you say they are corrupt, provide proof.

---

So you're saying trust system is centralized? In other words, you're indirectly saying every DT member is an alt of theymos, and he is abusing his power?

Say what? Bitch please:



And are you also gonna say that all the accusations and bullshit  truth about DT members not harassment?

Reference:

OgNasty tagging me after I called him out on his trust abuse!
 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4694278.msg42369766#msg42369766)
Vod trolling me with red tag!
 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4457684.msg39907096#msg39907096)
The Pharmacist is tagging shitposters with negative trust!
 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4565631.msg41141636#msg41141636)
Marlboroza changed email address after getting on DT2!
 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4447626.msg39747649#msg39747649)
@DT1 and DT2 members. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4447626.msg39747649#msg39747649)

Marlboroza is abusing DT power! (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4006863.msg37845480#msg37845480)

Do not trust actmyname.
 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3921227.msg37613151#msg37613151)
Do not trust suchmoon, a blatant trust abuser.
 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3853171.msg37414857#msg37414857)

---

I think you're lying again. I very vaguely remember you posting a screenshot of your telegram somewhere.

_Source?