Bitcoin Forum

Just recently i noticed a common trend with almost all ICOs.

There have been lots of complains that bounty hunters dump their tokens immediately after receiving them. Although, it is not true for all bounty hunters. Some still hold theirs.

Investors now get their tokens before bounty hunters. They are also allowed to start trading before bounty hunters get their rewards.
I believe this will prevent the investors from complaining and blaming the dump in price on bounty hunters.

I remember several projects that are listed on the exchange before being distributed to bounty hunters. The price in this case also fell immediately after the listing.

Most of the good projects already implement a kind of lock in period where they distribute the bounty and airdrop tokens after they are already doing to the investors.So it's nothing new

I think it is quite old practice and have seen such projects also during early 2017. Bounty hunters get their tokens for free while investors have bought them for real fiat so investors should be given opportunity to trade it first but when they will know that bounty hunters gonna come soon to dump their tokens, ICO investors will just keep the price lower by setting big buy orders at near or less than ICO price to get cheap coins from bounty hunters before driving the price up like crazy.

I think this is one of the strategy by most project anchor to prevent people from dumping their coin/token. Even most go to the extent of sharing negligible reward to their bounty hunters which I think is not an appropriate act.  I believe value of a coin should speak in market irrespective of whether people dump.

Socratus is a crypto project that will help you earn I advise you because I myself in Socratus

Good idea so what you have to do is to promote this to different marketing managers including the bounty managers.

or

You can visit each of their reachable contacts like telegram and ask them to do this so that investors will have a better part of their ICO.

I don't sure is that the hunter dumps the coin, for me, I have invested the ICO before and received the token before the hunter, and all the bounty hunter will receive it after a month later, but I still saw the people dump the coin in the market. Guess what? The investors earn the more bouns in the ICO, and dump it first.

It is true that investors have the first privilege to benefit from echange sites. Unlike bounty hunters a few months before they get their free tokens.

It is true that there are bounty hunters who holding their token, but they are bounty hunters at the same time, they also invest.

But those Bounty hunters who only received the free tokens, they are those who oftenly dumped the tokens.
In my opinion, only a few investors are selling their tokens immediately.

Usually they are holding even if they have the privilege of exchange.

I agree with this idea but, but this makes bounty hunters wait a long time to get their coins but they also have to keep promises to distribute tokens according to the agreed time

Not a new strategy, as I remember ICOs doing it years ago. But it's actually a pretty decent idea.

Only little problem is, quite often that turns into investors dumping before bounty hunters do, as they expect
a dump as soon as the bounty coins are released. It may delay the initial dump, however, so there is a chance for a bit of a rise and dump back down to ICO-ish or so levels.

Not necessarily. The dump isn't always because of bounty hunters dumping their percentage off in an exchange.
It might also mean early investors getting out of the scene after knowing certain flaws in an ICO or losing credibility thereafter.


It all boils down to the exact ICO in the first place.
If you don't like their terms, then don't apply. Simple.

Some ICOs lock tokens in 2 month for bounty campains. It is unfair. Bounty hunter do invite, PR,... for projects but they take less profit than investor.

This situation is more on hunters actions, they will immediately dump the token they get from bounty, and so the tokens price is down, compared to the ICO price.

the incident has become common, many ICO advisers suggest to prioritize investors. dump can not be prevented, because bountyhunter usually has many addresses ready to invade the market at once. I usually sell Tokens above ICO prices. if when the listing has not reached the target price of ICO then I will hold

I do not think bounty hunter or investors dump the token. I think people need to accept  ICO and crypocurrency for what it is. What you are investing fund or time on is high risk, high reward investment  and you could be extremely rich or get burnt to the ground! We should stop the blame game ASAP!

The budget allocated for bounty campaign is just 1-5% only of the total supply I don't think this will really affect the prices if bounty hunters dump their rewards and bounty hunters have all the right to dump their tokens or hold. I also don't think all bounty hunters are dumpers there are also some bounty hunters who are holders and believe in the project they joined.

I haven't experience a bounty were investors gets their coins first. Usually, bounty tokens will be sent first before it even hit the exchange. (this is just on bounties I joined). Some sent it have the same distribution for bounty and investors. I think this could affect the coin price but only in a short term. It will still depend on the products demand and if the developers are working on it. Don't blame everything on bounty hunters selling their coin. It is their right to sell their coin so as others holding their own coin. Live and let live man.

right here in the forum you have enough projects that lock you bounty rewards up to 1 week after the listing to avoid the dump, investors can also manipulate the market, but I imagine they are reliable because if they invested in the project they trust it, bounty hunters are simply there to make money, although if the project is really good it will have many hodlers.

Hi my friend, I don't think Bounty Hunters can dump their token because of the bounty pool very small approx 1% only! I am a bounty hunter, the time to receive the token it does not matter as long as they fully pay and no scam!

In this case reasonable that the coins are sold because it is a necessity of life not only to store coins, there are many needs that must be met. There are still many prize hunters who keep their coins for the long term by looking at the potential of the coin for the future. So the prize hunters keep the coins for a certain term investment.

I think the possibility of a dump is an organized fraud, and there may be a conspiracy of ICO project developers with Bounty Hunter, the question is "have you ever thought of it that way?"
Developers of a good ICO Project always think of investors from complaining.

Actually this is just the strategy of the owners of ICO for their altcoin prices not slumped, because of course the investors want their money back mumbuahkan good profit, especially the bounty hunter just want money from selling the coins as soon as possible, should the bounty hunter not in a hurry to immediately sell the coins, so they know the flavor of the investment and the benefits gained.

Of course, each company has a strategy, and I think it's their strategy to keep their altcoin prices from falling in the market because bounty hunters are just chasing money with as soon as possible their coins are sold, they should follow the rules of the game so they can get a good profit from coins they have. .

I don't think there's anything to worry about. The situation has been happening all the time. Bounty hunters use their time to work and earn profits. Some of them need immediate returns to sell encrypted currencies. This is indisputable.

It is good way. Because some investors don't like the bounty tokens. So there will be time for the correct market price.

I don’t think that Bounty Hunters are such a big deal, because usually companies give to hunters something around 1-2% of thir earnings during token sale, so how could it be?

I think it's not fair when bounty hunters get a reward after investors. Because people must first pay for work ... And the fact that they merge their coins is their business, and a good opportunity to buy for those who did not have time on the ico

However, I somewhat disagree with this. the Bounty Hunter received only a few percents of the amount of all the existing token. so if for the bounty hunter price being down drastic I think it is not entirely true. a lot of other factors that make the price being down and not from the bounty hunter only. Indeed, in fact, yes the price down but I think there are other things that cause this condition to occur.

I think investors should get their tokens before the bounty hunters. Otherwise the project falls after it hits the market, and people keep blaming the bounty hunters.

If that is true then please tell us how it would it affect the price of the token of the ICO project if the allocation to bounty hunter is just 1% to 5% at best. There are many reason that a token price will face like no real application of the project, the investors are not interested anymore, the project is a scam and even manipulation of whales an pump and dump groups but to tell that the price drop is due to bounty hunters is not true since they only have a small portion of the whole volume of the token.

I noticed this with some of the projects but definitely not most of them. But its definitely a legitimate practice which prevents a major price drop of the coin (in this market, most newly listed coins dumps either way, so they dont really need the help of bounty dumpers as well).

In addition to investors and bounty hunters, there are also advisers who receive coins before all and in large amounts. They are the first to sell these coins, bringing down their value!

Of course bounty hunter is a parameter on the market prices but relatively unimportant if there is a trade volume at the exchange. That's is the one of the reasons why the projects must list at the big exchanges. DEX could be dangerous if the volume is low.

I agree with you that Bounty Hunters is not the main issue when their token has been dump. Almost token will be manipulated by big investors or whale. And I think that the team should pay for hunter after paying for investors. So no one can blame Hunters.

Recent time it happens to all new ICOs, once bounty hunters receives their bounty reward they are selling immediately. So the price of the token is dumped.

I also think this is the new trend, some projects I participated in have listed on exchange and almost a month, they are still keeping bounty hunters tokens. Each time they give excuses. They believe hunters will sell off their coins and bring prices down, hence this new trend.

I agree and think that this is very true. Bounty hunters are very rarely affected by the price reduction.

I do not know what that irresponsible bounty hunter thinks. I do not understand why. Obviously I will not follow their lead. Because I know that this can hurt us all. It's hard to do bounty months but token prices just dropped.

there is no such fear if the project is good
price will go up and sellers regret selling

Many ICO advisers suggest to prioritize investors. dumps can not be prevented, Investors are a top priority within the ICO Project, and they will return to ICO next. I think if the ICO project is successful and the token shared has a good value, it is impossible for the bounty hunter to throw the tokens, because bounty hunters can still hold it as a future investment.

Bounty hunters get their tokens for not difficult work, therefore, they very easily relate to the received reward and are ready to spend it for their daily needs. In addition, recently, many projects show serious price failures of their tokens after the end of the ICOs. But I do not think that bounty hunters can influence the price reduction of the token, selling their rewards. The amount of bounty pool is usually very small.

to see the potential for growth that began to decline this will be very risky for the future.
 so using a new strategy is desperately needed to regain growth and make coins so profitable and generate more profits in the future.

of course, it also includes a great way. However when entering the market too much will not necessarily following with ICO and also the maximum price is yet. so it's not entirely priced drops below the ICO because bounty hunter who sell what they get.

Bounty hunters can really affect the price of a coin. But I do not think that this influence is very strong. Many hunters still hold the tokens they receive in the hope that the price of the coin will increase. Therefore, I do not think it's necessary to bounty hunters for all.

The important is bounty hunters still recieve their payment even they don't care the price of tokens the team is still generous and didn't give any unpleasant decision against bounty hunters.

but if we look at the reward of bounty hunters they usually get 1-5% of the total token sold depending on the ICOs. investors are the one that gets the most token compared to bounty hunter. price drops because there is no demand.

 I think that is an effective way to mitigate dumping of coins. But we cannot say that this dumping will be solved right thru this strategy. Some of the coin performs best when the hype is present and some performs worst when there is FUD or manipulation.

Usually, after receiving coins, the exchange rate drops sharply. It is quite fair that investors receive coins before they are distributed to bounty members. nevertheless, one who wants to keep coins for a long time will follow his concept despite a strategy regarding investors. And vice versa - the one who sells them immediately after entering the exchange, the same will also sell.

I don't think so, most of the project only reserve 1~5% of total tokens/ total sold tokens, how can bounty hunter affected the price with a few token? It's impossible, company complains because they don't want to paid/reduce bounty reward, main reason is market dip/ investor dump/ investor don't interest their project

lol...who told you investors don't dump the coins. If you want to verify this, follow up on all coins that got investors paid before hunters (recent listings not old ones), and you'll find out what you're thinking is opposite in reality. Investors also sell under ICO price even befire bounty hunters are paid. We need to stop blaming each other, the actual fact is that market is down and so it's affecting everything.

Maybe that's because they wanted bounty hunters to use their tokens as well. Let's face it, altcoins need users to survive. Cant blame them if they do such a move

After listing on the exchange, volumes are usually not large. Therefore, bounty hunters can affect the price. But I'm not saying that this is bad. This is another chance to earn. Sell at once part, then to buy again, but at a price lower.

It would be correct that tokens be blocked for a certain time, until they pay investors and bounty participants. After all this, you can start trading, so that everyone has equal conditions.

Falling of market price is temporary thing. And I am sure that in future we will see market recovering. Great advertisement promotional campaigns will help to realize ambitions of many holders and traders.

Even all of the bounty hunters dump their token within the date of the release it won't matter because most of the bounty reward are just 1%-5% of the circulating supply. Maybe the dump happens because of the investors who bought their tokens during presale.

No, I don't think so. This is an old strategy. people use it quite often dumping the coins right exactly after they receive them. Most of them are bounty hunters as they are working in crypto for daily purpose. But still I prefer Hodling is the best. Selling the coins at the right moment will be profitable.

I'm also not sure if hunters throw coins, for me I have invested ICO before and received tokens before hunters, and all the prize hunters will receive it after a month later, but I still see people throwing coins in the market.

If that's so , well it's a win win solution ,right ?
For bounty hunter , since they do not need to purchase any token but they can earn from bounty
meanwhile for investor who use their own money to invest ! Yes, the investor must become the top priority !

This is the new strategy that team members of projects have developed to prevent bounty hunters from dumping tokens. Others also give tokens to hunters after ICO so by that time, investors would have bought the tokens already.

I think this was not new i read a lot of project that they will lock the token of bounty hunter. the first priority is the investor but there a lot of project too that they give at the same time

regarding this strategy i think there is no guarantee investors will make the price of the particular tokens will stable or high because investors also aiming ROI and if they see the price of tokens high and possibly to get profit if they sold their tokens at that price then i'm pretty sure they will sold it too immediately with eventually the price will fall so i think this strategy won't run well because all of it still depend on the situation of the market itself

Since last year the investors takes their part first before the bounty hunters get theirs and as i believe that this investors now dump the coins before hunters since the newly entered ico investors are aiming for quick bucks and has no reason to hold coins for future gains

Long-term holding is the only strategy on which I can rely in full extent. Cryptocurrencies are very changeable and the market is very dynamic. I don’t think that it would be ok to start trade instead of just holding.

yes it makes sense, most investors must take part first before the bounty hunters get it because they expect a faster profit and do not want to lose the money it has invested by throwing away all the coins it has when the market price has increased

I agree. I do not understand why bounty hunters sell all coins almost immediately after the end of ICO.
I think that the most optimal strategy is to sell 50% and to leave 50% in the hold. It does not hurt if the coin falls and if it rises too.
Sincerely yours.

Investors can also act as bounty hunters. Immediately sell tokens after entering the exchange, thereby reducing the price to a minimum.
The best solution would be to lock the tokens until everyone gets them into their wallet. And then let them trade on equal terms.

Most of the investors also investing onto the ICOs in short term so there is no wonders if they start trading them when it got listed on exchange and basically who is upfront to trade will get more price and it will gradually falls down when the bounty hunters enters into the party.

I wouldn't say this is a new strategy, in fact I'm pretty sure it is the oldest strategy of them all. Think about it, as soon as thousands of bounty hunters get their tokens, the smart ones know that the price will dip once the huge influx of tokens hits the exchanges. In fact, some ICO investment groups buy a load of tokens at private sale prices, and then dump them immediately after listing to actualise their little profits.

Yeah, I have noticed it as well that most bounties are paying bounty participants later than investors. But all in all, I really do not think that this will stop the dump of certain icos.

Bounty is the main work for some of us.
And we don't have a lot of time for holding of coins. But. of course we hodl too. If we believe in the project. (We are not fools)
But we have other problem. Bounty hunters aren't dumping the price. Most often.
Topic starter speaks correctly. Investors receive the coins before us. But the price all the same falls.
Why?
It is a market tendency.
Or it's rly bad project. It's all.

Allocation of the bounty tokens and the locking period has the vital role for this scenario, Devs can lock tokens from transferring to unnecessary selloffs and usages of the tokens, the more tokens allocated for the bounty hunters and airdrops the more chance that it will dump more once the tokens are unlocked and was released from exchange that's why the dev's need to think a strategy to lessen those dumpers like staking.

As I recall, such a procedure has existed for a long time. First, new investors get tokens and only after the ICO is over, these tokens are received by bounty hunters after a while. In addition, some ICO teams either delay the payment of tokens, or for some time block their movement even after payment to the purses.
However, it is unlikely that a few percent of tokens paid to hunters can greatly reduce the rate of a new token on the exchange. Moreover, not all bounty hunters immediately sell them.

I think you're right, that's exactly what happened. I am an investor and include a bounty hunter. as far as I know everything is no problem when I start trading, even if the token price drops drastically it is a natural thing because ico often give big bonuses.

Maybe that's because they wanted bounty hunters to use their tokens as well. Let's face it, altcoins need users to survive. Cant blame them if they do such a move

You are spot on with this analysis. Since when they pay bounty hunters, majority tend to dump their coins which affects the price of the coin negatively, ICOs do this now, they hold the rewards. At least giving the investors who put actual money into the project a chance to make money before bounty hunters come into the picture and dip the price of the coin.

It is right for investors to receive tokens before bounty hunters because they have paid and then they can trade first, but I think most bounty hunters are likely to harm not only the growth of the projects they receive the tokens, but also the entire sector, selling immediately the tokens they receive from the bounty campaigns

I am not against such moves but it would not be bad for participants of cryptomarket. I am sure, that there are many people who like it and who hate it.

To my mind it is a just current trend, I don't think that it will continue to increase because the market is changing and trends will be changing as well.

Well, that actually explains it one way or the other. It is more like the whales trying to rip off the weak hands from the market anyway and like you said, that makes the bounty hunters who want to dump their tokens anyway to end up selling to them at the bottom when they have totally driven the price down pretty well.

Apparently, we should just say it is a way that the bigger investors have been able to find to deal with the weak bounty hunters who are always fond of dumping. At the same time, when an ICO and its project developments are promising and progressing as per roadmap, then no one will rush for dumping out.

Yes, it may be one of the strategies from the developers to make the investors satisfied with investing in their project. However, still, now, many ways are there to make the coins dumb. I also don't know why people sell away the tokens after distribution without analyzing the opportunities of the coins to grow in the future.

We can see a dump of price on ICO because there are higher numbers of people selling than buying, mostly dump ICO are those who have a private sale with a big amount of bonuses like %50 and I've seen also a %70 those Investors who buy tokens on private sell always win and the losers are those who buy on the main sale, I hope they will implement new rules about doing a private sale, and regarding about the bounty hunters how can 1% of total tokens from the ICO impact the market? the reason of the dump is not from bounty hunters.

Abundance seekers get their tokens for not troublesome work, thusly, they effectively identify with the got remunerate and are prepared to spend it for their every day needs. Moreover, as of late, numerous activities demonstrate genuine value disappointments of their tokens after the finish of the ICOs. Yet, I don't believe that abundance seekers can impact the value lessening of the token, offering their prizes. The measure of abundance pool is generally little.

I conclude investors should dispose their coins beforehand the charitableness huntswomen. Otherwise the plan dunks aft it manacles the bazaar, and humanity enjoy blaming the charitableness bounty hunters.

Not sure that bounty participants able to influence on a price. Keep in mind, that there no more than 1 percent of all emission usually send for bounty

Well the fact is, this really true.
with distribution where, investors and hunters get there token at the same time. is ridiculous.
Investors wont sell their token lower to the purchasing amount. while hunters will sell regardless of what they think. and just need a fast profit.
this affects a lot of projects with full potential.
I have seen some that in ICO its price goes to 0.1$ but after hunters dump their token. the value becomes 0.001$

I think all the bounty hunters have done this, but in my opinion all my actions depend on the project itself. If it is a good project, then I will wait until I trade and then consider selling it.

It would be a good thing for investors. by like that then they will not lose the opportunity to receive larger pay and appropriate expectations. indeed with the holding will be able to generate but bounty hunter tends to prefer direct would like to enjoy the results quickly.

yes maybe it is a new strategy to convince investors to be more profitable and can be more trusted so that in doing the initial division, can also to attract more interest.

I have seen this with few ICO bounty campaigns. Investors were paid with their tokens before they pay the bounty hunters. I think that will be good. But that will not be a problem for the hunters who hold their tokens for a long time

I don't think it's only bounty hunters dumping coins, but investors of pre sales who earn 200%, 300% bonuses,
they are able to sell below ico prices and dump the coins to rebuy cheap.

I think ICO investors should be a top priority because ICO goals will be successful if they collect a lot of money from investors, so investors should be given a chance to trade them first but when they will know that hunters will soon come to dispose of their tokens, will keep prices lower by setting a big buy order near or less than the ICO price to get cheap coins from the gift hunters before pushing prices up like crazy.

Bounty members are paid tokens later than investors for various reasons. And it's not only recently)

I do not know what strategy is in use by people, because I have a strategy for trading myself, I will invest in btc, buy with easy price and sell expensive price

I seriously do not see any issue on giving bounty hunters token at the same time. If the ICO is worth it then you shouldn't be worried about momentary dump of coins/tokens. The dump will come no matter when they will get their token/coin.

That's right and that's how the market works we need to utilize the market situation for our benefit as we can buy at low and sell at high price when the market pumps but it requires experience and ashould not panic.

In my opinion this is very fair to be but also willing to consider that many of investors are also dumping the price while selling there tokens right after ICO ends. So everybody used to say that this is because bounty hunters but it is not certain.

There is nothing to worry about. Situations like this have happened all the time before.
Hunt hunters use their time to work and earn profits. Some of them need a possible immediate return to sell the encrypted currency, this is a must.

 Yeah maybe thats the new strategy from investor and this is the bad behavior of bounty hunter they didnt wait to get good price they immediately sell after they recieve. But not all there some didnt they hold on it because they believe

I also agree with this thought, bounty hunters just make a little effections to its price at the begining. Then, if this coin is really strong, and many people really want to trade it, its price will be recovered again

I agree, but it makes the hunter wait a long time to get the coins, and they also have to keep the promise to distribute the tokens according to the agreed time. So, I think this strategy also has one side of weakness, where hunters have to wait longer.

However that won't be good also for the project and it's really ridiculous for an investor to dump below the ico price and that moment he'll lose. Yes investors should receive first and they're should be the one to believe in the project anyway and they should be taking the advantage to buy more from massive selling. I know it's really awful to see your investments fall but this is how risk evolve us.

I think the investors already dump the price when they get the tokens before the bounty hunters because they can sell the tokens first when the tokens launch in the market. besides that, I think this is happening in the past when the ICO is not too famous like today so the price is getting down after staying in the market for a long time and cannot increase higher. but for the true, I don't know if it's a new strategy or not because I think every investor and every bounty hunters still have a different strategy for each token that they get.

I concluded that investors should throw away their coins first by hunters. Otherwise, the plan will destroy the market, and people spontaneously blame the generous mercenaries, but these are not really those who run, unfortunately.

It's such a far-fetched accusation against bounty hunters. Usually they receive only a small share of tokens. This can not seriously fail the price. Rather to blame the advisers, who receive much more and immediately sell their tokens.

Some projects offer very large bonuses to initial investors, and this can be a source of dumped tokens. But of course it would be easier to blame bounty hunter for all situations that occur. But if the project is really good and the developer has the funds to pump the token, I think it does not matter, because the dumped tokens will be bought.

This practice is already being used. Investors in the first place. And only after that can get hunters. Because investors invest. hunters get them without investments.

If they will adopt that strategy, it will be good. Bounty hunters decide what they do with their reward, it should not be an issue if they dumped or not because they actually worked for and invested on the bounties too. Investment is not only in monetary terms, time and efforts of research and all can also be investments.

If it is a new strategy then is it good or bad, i think it is not good to hold hunters token since they are the grass root developers and they need to get their share of the cake. They should be treated fairly. if possible the bounty managers can introduce by backs from the hunters

In fact, bounty hunters have no effect on lowering the value of tokens. In addition, now there are many projects that after entering the exchange fall in price by 10 times. And this is all about the hunters? Is it serious?

If the project is a perspective one and there is big demand for the tokens the price should go up in fact but nowadays
lot of ICOs token price declining rapidly after being listed on exchanges. And not only the bounty hunters are the reason for it.
Some ICOs provide silly discounts  in pre-sale period like 70 % off in order to raise more capital. And then some of the
investors dump their tokens as well.

The decline of token prices after starting of listing is a big problem, so ICO teams could be trying to implement whatever helps in order to stop it, but I don't think it is a good strategy.

in the business must use the strategy for the product to succeed in the market so as a bounty hunter can also take advantage of this for business in order to get maximum results, we do not need to think about the company's strategy in managing their sales time but we take all the coins as much as possible by following bounty and sell it

indeed not all the bounty hunters throw the tokens they have there are also still holding for some time until the price back to normal because if all the hunter's gift tosses tokens then the price of tokens will surely come down drastically.

The activities of bounty hunters is less significant when it comes to dumping of tokens. Most times, investors are actively involved. There are also instances where team members also dump.

It could be true that bounty hunters will sell their bounties once they received them but the question here is that, does it affect the price of the token? I would say no because that is only a small percentage of the whole token supply.

such a low percentage is allocated to the bounty of a successfull ICO normally...
If all bounty hunters sold their coin at the same time surely it would have an effect, but probably not that catastrophic
and consider that many hold their bounty coin as well

The true inevestor is long-term thinking, whereas most bounty hunters are payroll takers immediately selling their tokens. I think your strategy is hard to implement.

how is your view in seeing this good opportunity? How investors identify whether or not a management team is leading to something good for investors, having something tangible and information provided accurately and realistically - or an ICO that is just a step without a clear vision, is nothing more than a blind step of a business idea ?

The concept of ICO is very simple. By downloading from Bitcoin your open source code to get Altcoin - an alternative coin - used as an underlying token in favor of movement and value transfer among users on the Blockchain network. The new coin allocated management, at this stage token is distributed to investors, who can benefit from increasing their value as new business customers and / or new coins to be traded.

This strategy already use it by many project before,  actually this is good strategy to protect investor from loss.  Investor should be become number 1 because from them the project will be success and the bounty hunter will get reward. Beside that, all project should be have other protection for investor like buy back program and burn token model to reduce  the supply.

The project team must know everything which affect their success of project. They must prepare all solutions before ICO. It's not all foul of bounty hunters.

There have been many great and well-executed projects implementing such strategies.
It's like a key in the period in which they distribute gift tokens and airdrop after they get the funds from the investors.
So, this is not new, we have to get used to it.

However, in my opinion, only a part of the sale is sold, and most people will still choose to hold on to it.
So in my opinion, the bounty thread really helps the project team a lot.

there are projects that bounty hunters doesnt dump. when the team and bounty manager integrity is high, there is no mis management and sudden changes in the rules, hunters tend to be loyal investors also. but if the management is poor and rules are not bounty hunter friendly, then hunters dump. so it is a mutual respect.

I do not know what the hunters think and what they imagine, I do not understand.
Surely we will not follow in their footsteps, because it's bad.
Things like this can hurt us all, it's hard to do bounty when the price goes down.

I have no such an experience that they made refund when ICO failed.
I have experienced the opposite when the ICO raised funds the Team  disappeared and no further development and no any refund was made.

LoL. That are just blame. Because the projects only allocate 1-5% total supply for bounty campaigns (maybe more 5%, but rarely). That 5% will dump their tokens?!? Kidding me? They always have a bonus for pre-sale, pre-ICO,... (maybe have 2nd phase, 3rd phase,...) with 25%, 50%, even 100%. Then they said ICO price: 1 token = $100. So, 1 token really worth $50 because of the bonus. Therefore, that is not the fault of bounty hunters.

This can be a solution but I think this change nothing because in this way investors that believe in project and hold coins will not have any advantages compared to before.

That is not a new thing, investors should be received the token first, then the hunters later. As an investors, if they already pay but not yet receiving any tokens, they will doubt the company because slow and will sell the tokens after it listed on the market.

Why not pay hunters in Eth instead? The truth is that these ico projects are only concerned about making profit. They do not care if the value of their tokens dips below ico price after listing on exchange. They do not have the interest of their investors at heart not to talk of bounty hunters

There are so many people who are participating in different kind of bounty campaigns and that they are also making some good amount of money too. However, you have to work harder at time you are busy in bounty and that you have to give enough of your time and efforts to it so that you can then get higher merits which will then result in more money for your better earning.

I have already observed how tokens come first to investors, and only then to hunters!

this strategy might be good for investors but is this also a good strategy for bounty hunters, maybe most of the bounty hunters will not accept this new strategy, because they will think that this will be very unfair because investors receive tokens instead. first from an ico, while the ico development team instead ruled out bounty hunters, it is better to rethink this strategy whether it will help or even make the hunters go out.

But mostly they put blame into bounty hunters and that's also create misunderstanding between participants and developers. It is also another reason why there is a delay for rewards distribution to prevent from that certain scenarios.

I think the token rate for bounty is not much. So if the bounty hunter sells the token, it will not affect the price. It is important that a good project will keep the price stable.

Bounty hunters were never the ones dumping their tokens in the first place and that is almost like the same investors doing this are the ones complaining for no reason. Most of the investors that got in earlier, and got a lot of bonuses can easily get out to wade off the weak hands from the market. So, I do not in anyway believe dumping of market is anyway the fault of the hunters and just like you said, they are just a little piece of the whole equation when it comes to the whole market of a particular project.

Unfortunately, it's like a new rule, sometimes bounty tokens are served months after the sale end. Morpheus is a good(more like a bad) example of being so unrespectful to bounty hunters. They threaten you with the ban if you start asking too active for tokens.

It is true that bounty hunter head straight to market as soon as they received their token but I think d reason is that most of them have burn lots of data since data are not free and they need to get another data to be able to participate on another bounty. My opinion.

Strategies in the digital currency market are determined by experience. so investors can often change strategy. my new strategy is to not hurry while buying and trying to get it at the lowest price.

I personally did not sell any token to date
I Wait for the price to improve as the market rises, which we are all waiting for

everyone will also do that, but in reality we are often wrong, we think that now includes the lowest price,
but it still goes down too, because in crypto there is no benchmark price, everything moves so fast.

Yes, maybe it will help the coin not to fall in the first weeks or months. Perhaps bounty hunters and sold coins as soon as they go to the exchange, But not all do so. If the coin is very interesting and promising will always keep the coin to the peak price

in my opinion, this or this happens on purpose or it comes from lack of knowledge and inability to wait for the right moment to sell, that's because of these situations, the coin is not enough.

This is nonsense .. Since headhunters get only a couple of percent of all tokens ... The rate is just the same and investors are failing

That has been a huge lie all along and some investors just looking for those to push the blame on. The investors and most especially the whales that participated earlier in the ICO and got huge bonus are the ones that always end up dumping once the token or coin hits the market and try to get out the weak hands so they can buy more at the dips.
Very few bounty hunters always end up selling at the dip anyway as dumb as they are but a lot of bounty participants hold.

I read an interesting article about smartdrops on coindesk not so long ago and this could be a way to stop this:https://www.coindesk.com/say-hello-to-smartdrops-the-new-way-to-give-away-crypto-money/

 I also read the bounty hunters got rewards then dumped them to help them get on exchanges but perhaps I did not read correctly.

Yes that is a good practice because they are the investor of the project in some point they must have an advantages

That is a way for the project to protect their investors from price dumps. Some also employ lock-in periods that gradually tokens from wallet for a certain period before they can be traded in excahnge. Others lock all holdings until they have listed the coins in top exchanges.

I have also notice that this change in strategy has nevet help those ICO that adopted it! Cryptocurrency is abour freedom, not restrictions! The truth here is that, when market dump, is not because of anybody! I hope people stop demonizing bounty hunters! If you can't take the heat as an investors, get out of the kitchen!

Do you want to say that 80% of the projects are engaged in such manipulations? This is bullshit. Everyone is trying to sell their coins as costly as possible, especially investors who know that the price will soon collapse.

it's really friends, prize hunters are only given 1-3% of the total sales of tokens.

we play counting, if 3% of the total sales of tokens in dumps it doesn't make sense,
Investors and 97% are still free to own the worst dumps of around 10% - 97%, so where maybe 3% of the prize hunters can reduce the total supply by 97%, hallloo !!

I do not even know where the whole idea of the bounty participants being the ones dumping on the market started from. Probably some big investors trying to use that as a tactics to remove the eye of the community from them. Whales are always responsible and it is not like the whole bounty participants amount put together will really make much impact anyway since some give as low as 1% of total contributed during ICO and 1% is nothing as far as I am concerned.

Devs already know gradually the bounty participants were never the fault since so far, some participants never get to receive their token until it has been listed for a long time and still, the price of the token gets to drop. Those who dump on the market are the ones holding the larger share of the market, and since they were fortunate to get a whole lot during the bonus period and pre phase, they had a lot on them to dump at once.

Wealth searchers get their tokens for not troublesome work, in this manner, they successfully relate to the got compensate and are set up to spend it for their consistently needs. Besides, starting late, various exercises exhibit certifiable esteem frustrations of their tokens after the complete of the ICOs. However, I don't trust that wealth searchers can affect the esteem decreasing of the token, offering their prizes. The measure of wealth pool is for the most pretty much nothing.

To me they are only giving opportunity to investors to sell at good price. Bounty hunters dump tokens at that is it, but not all do that thou. So before they come and spoil the price, they would have exchanged it

To be fair, there should be legislation for bounty hunters. That would have kept the money hunters from reducing the dumping impact on ICO investors.

I've always done just that, and I've got all my money so far. I do not understand why wait for a miracle and lose precious time

This is a great strategy and it is used by the majority. I think that we should not neglect it in order not to lose their money entirely

The possibility of this is here, yes, but I think that they just want to survive only and this trend will be out soon. Do not be so scared about it. But I recommend not to work with ICOs now, there are a lot of scams now and the end is not close.

Most airdrops are junk and worthless.  This is not a new strategy

I noticed that investors received coins immediately and when listing on the exchange they themselves and merged it, and already after received the hunters. in this market, in any case, all will merge the coin, and even if they are littered on the shit the exchange can not be avoided. Just looking for others to blame but yourself

I think now some projects have done this to avoid dumping bounty hunters and giving investors the opportunity to get their profits first.

The statement that hunters are ruining the price is not true. How can hunters dump the price? having at the most 5% of all coins. It will be dumped by the investors who bought on the preliminary sale where they bought with a big discount.

There are so many strategies on the current cryptomarket with ICOs and other similar projects that I think they are just finding their way to be alive till this stagnancy.

In my view, this is not a strategy, but a decision that their team has made through the advisory team. As a bounty hunter, you must accept the decision of the project.

Yes, it was a long way to use. We know that the investors to get the token they should buy. While the bounty hunter to get a token for free. And most of the bounty hunter when the token already entered the Exchange they are directly selling the coins. And this is the price that makes the token straight fall. And some investors have complained because of the token straight fall.

investors feel aggrieved by the circumstances in which the bounty hunter soon sell what they get. and that just makes the price of getting down and of course also result in income earned by investors. so perhaps with investors receive payment in advance is a good thing to do so that what they invest will be in accordance with the estimated in ICO or at least come close.

If this is the trend, that investors are allowed to sell before the bounty hunters, ICOs would be just a means for short-term investment. With the majority of the coins selling their hodlings right away, I think the project will not prosper because investors sell off their share.

It is really the fact that many of those are worthless and totally the waste of time if you become part of all the airdrops. Choose only few based on your idea and researching which can be real and will be still existing after 1 years of time. So be wise and chose the right.

On my opinion, I would say yes but not totally. Each of us have different perceptions as we adjust the situation here in the world of crypto currency. I believe that it will recover soon though we don't have any idea when since the market is in chaos. Hopefully in the future that each and everyone of us will have a great profit as we try our luck here.

But almost totally (lol), I guess Its a right of we bounty hunters either dump or hold our token that we had earn from any bounties. Its up to them, I mean those Investors if they want to sell their token too, after all we had done dumping ours. Just like you've said each of us has a different perception in the world of cryptos.

Since the amount of tokens given to bounty hunters is incomparably smaller than that of investors, this measure is implemented to have a soothing effect on investors rather than for real prevention of price falling during the first days(and sometimes hours) of coin's appearance on the markets. In reality it is them, the investors, who sell their coins immediately when it becomes possible, thus significantly reducing the price. I don't blame them because in many cases only this way (by selling as early as possible) you can return your investments or even make some profits, but they should not blame the bounty hunters in the price dropping either.

And let's imagine a situation when bounty hunters do impact the market by their selling. If you believe in a coin then buy when bounty hunters are selling or just hold. What's the problem? If you know that it's a good coin and it will rise in the future then you only will make more profits, right?

I agree with this idea, but this makes the bounty hunters have to wait a long time for the rewards to be given. most importantly they can keep their promises that payments must be made on time and there is no delay.

I wouldn't state this is another system, in truth I'm almost certain it is the most seasoned technique of all. Consider it, soon as a huge number of abundance seekers get their tokens, the brilliant ones realize that the cost will plunge once the gigantic convergence of tokens hits the trades. Truth be told, some ICO speculation bunches purchase a heap of tokens at private deal costs, and afterward dump them instantly subsequent to leaning to actualise their little benefits.

Trends could not be strategies so be calm about it, it is not for always and it will be needed so soon. I think that strategies have to have more far-sighted plans.

what the hunters drop is a drop in the sea. they do not push the price tag to the bottom. The bulk of the dump of the coin is just from investors who bought at the pre sale with a discount of 60% and the output is quickly drained off

A good strategy is this month because the ETH is down and we can buy it at a low price. because the possibility of ETH for next year will increase.

I do not understand whether this new strategy or how. the obvious condition is indeed not like usually. down up to a very low nominal. This could be a stepping stone or even a bad news.

The smart ones know that the price will dip once the huge influx of tokens hits the exchanges. In fact, some ICO investment groups buy a load of tokens at private sale prices, and then dump them immediately after listing to actualise their little profits.

Only one % is given to bounty hunters on most occasions and they still blame us when projects fail. Even with the one %, not all hunters do dump their own, a lot of them including me and my friends I know do well to hold.

sounds cool but not every ICO lists their tokens on exchanges before paying hunters. but if so then this strategy might be useful.

I also try to sell tokens right after I receive them because coins almost always fall in price after listing.

So, maybe what is the reason why the price of those coins fell after the listing in any exchange? In my own perception the price in the exchange is depends on how trader sell their coins specially to those bounty hunters who has not `enough knowledge about trading.

So the whole point is that the market is Bearish.
I am sure that these investors also have the profits from the purchase of Presale and Private Sale.

So if there are people who blame bounty hunters for this problem then it's a big mistake .

For me ,while it's on dump my strategy is to buy a cheaper coins and make it a long term investment and not greediness everytime,I think this is the only way we can be more profitable because we're capable to wait for higher market value.

Many ICO are making this strategy but I think this is really not useful. Bounty hunters that sell their tokens are just a small % of total coins and they can't have a big influence in market.

It has the right to reward prizes, if you want to sell it or hold it or depend on the owner of the token.
And it is also true that a bounty hunter needs to eat results from during his work by working on a bounty that can take months.

ICO that are successful have become individual project with their blockchain tunning their own protocol! ICO can kickstart a project and place it in the top 100 coin on coinmatketcap. The key to been successful is research and finding quality project!

I don't think this is the best strategy, because when the hunters sell their awards, someone buys them. So the project is good and people need coins and tokens. So investors can still at a low price to buy coins. If the project is bad, then this strategy will still not save the death of the project, just delay for a while, and a really good coin after ICO is only growing.

it's true that when you get a reward most of the bounty participants will immediately sell it is normal, because they definitely need the results to be enjoyed and not care about cheap or expensive prices.

Your answer is incorrect and not in line with my statement.
I answered in this thread about the bounty hunte who threw out the coin and you answered "buy coins at the bottom price by waiting for the price to go up"

LOL

 mostly does, short by bounty hunters, early investor, and opportunist who have no interest on the project rather than really funding the project itself.

Yes, and for some of the investor, they will buy at the low price with the large amount and hold it for a long time. Selling the token after its releases on the market can be a solution for the bounty participants because they need money from their rewards. But I think not all participants sell all their tokens especially if the project has good enough to develop the project and they will wait until the project can get success and this will make the price of the token will also increase.

In fact, much depends on the strategy of the project and the percentage allocated to the bounty, which should not be more than 2 %. Investors can also drop the price if the project at an early stage allocated too generous bonuses.

Actually that is not really important for me . Because yes ico investors investing their money to icos but bounty hunters also spending really big time for that bounties.
So i want to ask a question. which is important .. Time or money. in my opinion time is the most important thing in the world. So finally i believe bounty hunters deserve their tokens
before than ico investors.

It would be great if the bounty hunter held their tokens, and waited for the right time when the market situation turned green. But investors may not trade, before the bounty hunter receives their work tokens. This will be better and more balanced. 8) 8)

For me bounty this, too, lifetime earnings. And I always sell tokens as soon as I get them. This is the most profitable solution. So do not blame the hunters, they just do everything to get the maximum benefit and earn

This is the right decision of all hunters. They want to make money and I fully agree with them. If they wait a long time then most likely will get absolutely nothing in the end. It is the best solution to sell tokens as soon as they are received and listed