Bitcoin Forum

It come to my attention that a lot of the high ranked members Lauda included are promoting heavily hazard.Online casinos which are in their local country ilegal.The promotion of these websites are also ilegal for them.
So how does it come that these people promote gambling websites which are by their local laws ilegal.

Wouldn't it fit to that forum rule



I wanted also to ask to our beloved high ranked members who are fighting for the good of that community how promoting hazard is going to improve our community ?

Random accusations against DT members will not remove your -11 feedback. Give it up.

Gambling isn't "goods," so that rule doesn't apply.  You're attempts to tarnish the reputation high ranking, trusted forum members is starting to resemble grasping at straws.  

Speaking of which, where's the proof that suchmoon is a scammer?  Did you get tired of running around that bush, so started this detraction?  Your tactics are so transparent it's laughable.  

Funny how you interpret inofficial forum rules.If its against high ranked members you are very strict on these rules even to a grate you could be described as an idiot (please see defenition of that word).
But if you take the same rule against other users you interpret it very lax.
How does it come you make so big diffrences ?

Also i would like to advise you that laws are by far more important than forum rules.

@TMAN your post in my trust rating


According to Alexa nearly 35% of bitcointalk visitors are underaged.
You are promoting harzard to underaged people.Thats really bad and you talk about leaving users vulnerable ?

Just report Lauda's posts that break the rules and if you're right she'll get banned in a jiffy.

Then you can come back here to gloat.

Can you please stop trying? You're only making a fool out of yourself by posting these kinds of topics.

It was deleted from the stake.com thread where it was blatantly off topic (nothing to do with stake.com). I reported it BTW.

But nice job derailing your own thread now with irrelevant complaints.

Didn't someone try this exact same thing a few months ago?  I seem to recall this accusation being leveled against Lauda and/or other members.

In any case, this isn't a community issue, it's not a reputation issue, and Lauda isn't the only member advertising a gambling site.  In addition, Theymos is well aware that members are advertising for casinos and if there are any legal issues, that's on him.

This is nothing more than a witch hunt, and it'll go nowhere.  The fight is getting desperate, eh Thule?

You are calling to protect underaged people against ilegal harzard a desperate witch hunt ?

Where did your sense of protection went abord ?

I can imagine the next complaint: "There is this guy claiming to be a pharmacist but is he licensed in all countries where Bitcointalk is available? VERY ILLEGAL AND HE HASN'T DENIED IT!!!"


Please ask theymos to implement KYC so that we would know who's "underaged" and could protect them.

AFAIK they are perfectly legal under my jurisdiction, which is Mars. Try again. :)

I’m seeing Thule too much today ugh

Where's the common decency?  Here we have a martian feline of high repute promoting gambling.  What will come next?  Forum members promoting services that obfuscate the tractability of bitcoin?  Such naughty, naughty behavior.  For shame.

Thinking about children might be illegal in some jurisdictions.

Well, so according to you advertise gambling is against forum rules. So first you need open thread against theymos. He is also advertising gambling site, check here ; https://bitcointalk.org/adrotate.php?adinfo . ( Archived (http://archive.is/Qqym0) )





Seems BETBIT is a gambling site. So ask theymos to remove gambling section from forum and stop advertising as well.

FIY,

I doubt europe would agree with that


You have no problem to promote hazard to underaged people ?

Advertising 18+ content on a public forum isn't illegal. The advertised casino's clearly state on their landing page that all users have to be 18+. Stop pretending to be a moralist.

Lauda is under EU regulations so it is ilegal for him.
In the US its also being hunted.
Did you miss the crack down ?

You are generalising which shows already you have no clue if you put diffrent jurisdictions and niches into one pot.But you are allowed to proof me wrong about advertising gambling websites which have no license with facts

Seeing your signature i understand why you defend it with nonsense

On my way home from work today I heard an ad on the radio for a betting site! Minors can't gamble! When I got home, I immediately called the government to complain, and request that all radio broadcasts be immediately banned. Then I turned on my TV and saw an advert for Bud Light! Minors can't drink! I phoned the government back to request all TV broadcasts be banned. I quickly checked Facebook and saw an advert for a BMW! Minors can't drive! I called the government. I decided to read the newspaper instead, and saw adverts for a local wedding shop, estate agent, and tattoo parlor! Minors can't get married, buy property, or get a tattoo! Tried phoning the government again, but turns out they've blocked my number. I've emailed them instead.

Then I come on bitcointalk and see this! Scandal!

==================================================================================================


Click here for source. (https://www.egba.eu/news-post/egba-statement-on-italys-proposed-gambling-ban/)

This was a response to Italy's "crackdown" on illegal lotteries and illegal gambling. It clearly states that the European Gambling and Betting Association is not against online advertising. Your problem is about promoting gambling to minors (technically your problem is with Lauda and you're just looking for excuses to create more bullshit topics). None of the forum advertisement/signatures I've seen so far are explicitely enticing minors at all. When signing up on FortuneJack they clearly state that you have to be 18+:

https://i.imgur.com/9OrdyBll.png

In their T&C they also clearly state that underage gambling is illegal:


All other registered and regulated online casino's will have similar warnings. Feel free to report any casino that doesn't warn underage gamblers (or are enticing them to gamble on their platform).

And to the last reply.


You both change facts.

You claim promoting legal casions which are under governmental control and which is being monitored 24h and needs to pass standards is the same like advertising non legal websites which don't need to pass any standards.

Promoting gambling websites which have no licenses is ilegal POINT.

You can post as much as you want showing products which have a legal license and which have to uphold local laws and standards is not the same as a casino with no license without upholding any standards and without being monitored and checked by governmental organisations.

Its like saying buying baby milk is allowed in the US so is it allowed to sell poisened baby milk from china.
baby milk needs to pass also sanitarian controls before being allowed to be sold.And chinese poisened milk would never hit the domestic market.


@
TheNewAnon135246

At least open your eyes when you read.
They demand to not ban all advertisement but only on gambling websites which have no license.
So you just proofed what i claim

FortuneJack has a license so I fail to see the issue here.. Feel free to report them if you believe they are illegally running a casino.

As for this topic, it would be great if you could stop making unfounded allegations against forum members. Thanks!

You mean the small island in south america?

By whom is that license recognised?Which standards are being fullfilled

LOL......

You are advertising so you are responsible for your actions.
Fortunejack is not doing anything ilegal since they are registered on that island and officaly distributing from there.
The only one breaking laws is you advertisers

Please tell me what specific law article I am breaking.

Tell me your jurisdiction and i will tell you

So call the fucking cops, they will enjoy laughing at you as much as we have.

If he asks me to do so i will

Where are you located ?

are you called it trusted?  :o ::)

https://i.imgur.com/7H7mUXr.png


thats so funny :D

Not sure why you want to show off how your trust list affects their profile.

I can easily adjust my trust settings to show any user as severely negative. In fact, if a user isn't negative enough in one's perspective, it's simple enough to create alt accounts to flame them with negative feedback and add them to one's trust list. Not that this has any real effect if the feedback is without substance.

@Flying Hellfish


Since you as staff are activly promoting gambling without license on this forum and claim to protect bitcointalk members.....

Maybe you can tell me what kind of probability setting have your advertised gambling website so people won't become addicts and won't lose their last underpants ?

In a licensed and governmental controled gambling websites these settings are defined by law to protect customers.

What about your gambling website ?What are their probability settings ?

I highly doubt you know them.

may be you mean this?

or this ?

there is too much feeds to show how you stupid asshole

I think he means house edge but let him rant on, this is quite funny.

How can I be a pedophile when I'm only 15? ::)

Those are mighty strong words you're using. If only you spent as much time learning English as you did trolling, perhaps you would be able to formulate a proper sentence.

Interestingly enough, I did have a thread discussing the effects of higher house edge: that it was inversely proportional to the number of problem gamblers created.

i didnt call you pedophile i just quoted thats person's mean
i called you stupid asshole and it's true
that not strange when you calling troll someone that show you your mistakes and your stupid troubles
its not necessary for me to learn english better when i speak in 8 languages without translator
you see my grammar mistakes but you so stupid coz you not see mechanical mistakes
anyway) all of this shit is your own problem

It's biggest nonsense that I read today. Why do you want to ban Lauda only? Lauda is the only person on this forum who promote gambling website? Following your logic half of forum should be banned. BTW, things like Bitcoin or ICO's is also illegal in some countries. So, users who promote ICO's also should be banned if it's illegal in their country?
And are you sure that gambling is illegal in Lauda's country?
Anyway, your accussation is useless because this rule is about marketplace - it's not allowed to sell illegal things on Bitcointalk like drugs and similar stuff. Signature advertisements ≠ marketplace

@ Stupid Twat

It is not my job to protect anyone, it's not my job to hold your hand or be nice to anyone, it's your job to protect yourself, don't like it too fucking bad, call the cops, go away or keep crying like you have sand in your pussy, it all leads to the same place for you, no where!

BTW I am in Canada and online gambling is NOT illegal in my country, but hey as I mentioned feel free to call the cops, I will even give you the phone number for the RCMP if you can't find it!

Don't worry, Thule is now asking to ban all gambling advertising (sorry, I can't be bothered to post a link but you'll find it in Meta).

If only he could channel all this energy into something productive. Or at least get laid and stop fucking around the forum.

That very nicely points out the absurdity of OP's argument.  Not that I think for one minute that he's being sincere or thinking about anything aside from his hatred of Lauda, but if he was, this is how silly his requests becomes.  Well done.

From what I've read, you think people can't become gambling addicts if they play in regulated casinos, even worst, you think people can't lose everything they have if they play in such casinos. Well that is just one big crazy assumption and it is completely wrong.

But keep going, it is funny to read your nonsense.

I used to work in an actual real life, "bricks and mortar" casino... all of the odds and house edge etc were government regulated. Even the required payouts for slot machines as a percentage of money put into them was government regulated. Side note, this percentage was actually lowered in an attempt to try to stop people becoming addicted (ie. lower the payouts, people will not want to play them etc)

I saw first hand, every single day I was at work... that none of this regulation made any difference whatsoever.

There were still people who couldn't afford the $10 carpark fee... others who were walking around approaching other patrons offering to sell handbags, phones, necklaces, rings so they could have $20 to gamble... others who would wander the casino for hours looking for 2c worth of credit left on a machine so they could either play it or try collecting it so they could make it up to $1 to cash out etc.

While I applaud your cry for consumer protection... attempting to use it as a "weapon" in your ongoing battle against certain forum members is just pure folly.

OP can always contact iTech Labs (https://itechlabs.com/) and ask them about RNG certificates of certain sites. Actually, I am not sure what OP is trying to do here. Ban Lauda, ban advertisers, ban gambling sites...ban everyone?

The primary purpose was to get Lauda banned, or at least removed from DT. When it was pointed out to Thule that even Bitcointalk.org has a banner add for a gambling site, it switched to a campaign to ban gambling advertising. However, even if theymos implemented a ban, (which he won't,) I'm sure that he would give people plenty of warning so they could remove their sig advertisement. I'm sure Theymos doesn't want to ban a substantial amount of users on this forum.

Thats a good suggestion for OP i think. He isn't going to get any good result by doing this kind of meaningless thread. Everytime he put false blame on others and targetting same person. In real its not going to make any difference.

IMO he should stop now before new users starting to use their "Ignore" button specially for him.

First of all there is no false blame.These gambling websites have no licenses for major jurisdiction thats a fact nobody can deny.Its also a fact that people living in these jurisdictions are not allowed to advertise these gambling websites thats also a fact.
You trying to defame me that its about Lauda is just a poor try to slow down that thread.
Its about gambling in general on this forum.
Its the double standard of the high ranked members claiming to protect forums member by tagging everyone for the lowest shit but when it comes to gambling they close their eyes and promote it themself because they get money for it.

Thats a thread showing the pathetic behavior of these so called police member who are hunting abusers and protecting the community and at the same time advertise gambling to non licensed websites where you don't even know if these games are not staged.

Do you even bother to read the T&C of gambling websites? A Curacao license is valid in any jurisdiction where online gambling is legal. Each online casino has list of jurisdictions where online gambling is illegal. By accepting the T&C you acknowledge that you are outside any of those jurisdictions.


Your topic title is "Lauda breaking forum rules ?". ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

See:

Betcoin.ag
BetKing.io
MoneyPot
JackpotRacer

and then the reply goes "DT members only tagged them because they didn't get paid"

What have you smoked?

I guess most of us are criminals in quite a few jurisdictions...

Unless the court interprets the intent...

https://www.dailydot.com/debug/child-porn-blockchain/

 :-[ :-[