Bitcoin Forum

I Notice that most projects that conducted bounty finds it difficult to enter the crypto market especially a quality market. i think most are afraid of been dump.
what are the possible reasons why tokens takes too much time before getting listed on exchange.   

z

Most of those tokens are worthless. They know that, and as the owner's own a lot of them they try to maximize their gains (by paying high amounts of BTC for listing is good exchanges).

Very few projects prospers, this is why it is more secure to invest in BTC than in those ICO.

It caused by the developers itself, there was a lot of altcoins that created bounty campaign and they can list its token to the exchange site easily. the developers are feeling worried because the dev can't pay exchange site or don't wanna spend some money to do that. qdao is a new token but it listed instantly.

The projects start their fundraising even before they start developing and the time in between fundraising and being able to provide the product is going to be difficult for the price of token. Another reason is the project don't want to buy time to get to safe place before making it's investors realize that they have been scammed.
Both of the discussion are correct. In a conclusion, it's better for the project token to enter the market later than early.

Do you mean the new projects whose you participate in the bounty?
Actually, most new projects that have ended their token sale will wait for at least one month to enter the market. It is influenced by some factors from the developer team, change to enter the good exchanges, not dealing with a certain exchange, or even waiting for better market conditions.
And after getting listed, most coins will have dropped prices if we compare to the price in ICO. It is normal and always be this one. So try to participate in worthier c=bonty programs that promote promising projects with real products, in order that the coins after listed will not be dead

because they aim to maintain the value of tokens. based on the experience that has occurred, after listing to the market, the token will decrease its exchange value and it certainly cannot be accepted by the team and also the investor. they will wait for their smart contract coins to go up to the moon first, then the market exchange token listing process will follow. It aims to increase the token exchange rate.

in my opinion most of the bounty projects its to difficult to enter the crypto market especially the quality market because it is not afraid of dumps, but they certainly have their own opinions and views, which they certainly do not want their investors to suffer, and can also be due to many considerations they want their products to grow and bring benefits to all parties, both investors, companies and users of their products.

'quality' exchange fees are high and often most of those bounty project ICOs, don't have enough funds for that.

Regarding dump, bounty hunters sell their tokens as soon as they get them, may be it would be better strategy to lock tokens until there is utility available so buying side can sustain the dump.

I think that everything would done undergo negotiation and process. Bounty projects really takes time to be listed on exchanges due to the projects are starting to develop and not yet finish with their outcome, they should develop first and make something about their projected plans so that tokens and coins has a value.

They already that their token will be worthless ,many new projects are plague with this issue ,you will see them waiting for better surge in market price or altcoins season before getting listed because they know how weak their token product is

Most of the ICO nowadays are worthless and really doesn't have value, inorder for a token to be put on exchanges, they need to pay money to the exchange, most of the ICO really doesn't want to pay them especially when their ICO only gain a small amount of money. So they find a small exchange or some of them really is not.

I want to believe that what you said is the main possible reason why some of them do not enter exchange, initially, I thought it was as a result if the bear market which will encourage people to panic sell their token immediately, but now that we are already in bullish trend, I see no reason why they don’t want to enter an exchange.

It is either the project is a typical scam, or the project does not have a working product that will enable their value to continue to grow even if it is being dumped, so they may not enter an exchange because of the fear of dumping their project. I see some of them that enter all these low quality exchange too as scam, because they know there is no way the investors can get the volume to sell the token, so it is still a tactic to further delay their investment.

Many of the new projects find it hard to enter market because they don't want dumpers to dump and that will have bad impact of their tokens price ,many are on halt for now till ethereum start increasing in price but I believe that only weak projects wait for increase in market movement before listing on exchanges

most of the projects that have long entered the exchange mostly have the same reasons, namely focusing on developing their products or services first after the process has been running, they are targeting the exchange, on the other side, there are also scam projects that use this reason and after that the project team disappears a little wary if you find this kind of thing.

We must have been participating in vastly different campaigns, always do my due diligence before participating in any bounty campaign, and so far it has worked so me because the campaigns I have participated in mostly lists in an exchange fast and do well in the long run.

Not all coins of projects that do bounty take time to get listed on exchange, some get listed very fast, some are already trading before they begin the bounty. Probably, it depends on the projects you choose to promote, always do proper research before doing a bounty so you don't keep bagging shitcoins.

Many of those projects have no intention of getting listed and continue production for the projects because they are scam,the intention they have from the very start is to get hands on ICO/IEO funds raised by investors

Have you seen the market situation now? To enter the market and lose in price 90 percent? Look at OCEAN PROTOCOL, which entered the market in 1.5 years and lost 80 percent! No need to rush, you must go to the stock exchange during growth - then the tokens will be more expensive!

What you want to say exactly, do you want to say that crypto market is in a bad situation?
I don't think crypto market is in a too bad situation. Moreover, after Bitcoin was rising significantly in the previous month, crypto market looks better.

It is much better than never enters the market and lose 100 percent.  ;D

What you mean by saying "stock exchange"??
Do we need a stock exchange?
 ???

Guys, do not bother to express your conjectures, this is the man who exactly wrote. I agree with him a hundred percent.


Most of the projects, it is unnecessary junk to anyone

Actually, this is a bounty, but the project team is selling tokens through ICO. Each ICO project certainly has its own different roadmap, and they will certainly analyze and consider market conditions when they have to release exchanges where their tokens will be listed. In addition, it takes a long time to negotiate with the exchange, determine the right and trusted exchange. In this case, it is better when immediately, but in a hurry also does not signify good because who knows if they will instead choose a bad exchange.

Listing a token on exchange at the heart of the bear market can have some adverse effect on the performance of the token, demand is generally low and will leave to eventual dumping on the few available buy orders.Also, many top exchanges are very expensive

It's just so happened many bounty campaign project now have decided to delay entering in market for the possible of losing value of their token especially when market is bearish. However, it is more profitable if the token release at a good time during possible bull run.

Because listing involves a lot of conditions which any smart project will have to considered thoroughly and way the advantages and disadvantages before agreeing to the terms, aside from having the money to pay the listing fees, the crucial part is meeting up with terms and conditions otherwise it could result in a not so good way.
So most often new project tries to look for a more favorable terms that will best suite that project rather been exploited and this will result to delay.

The most common reason is that they are really afraid of dump trading after their token is unlock specially in this bearish environment. Even how beautiful and how feasible their token platform but with this unhealthy market then expect most of the token holders will grab the slightest opportunity to earn even the price is still cheap that is why the developers will delayed the listing.

Maybe they are still working with the project and don't want to disappoint their investors. Its not easy to be listed on a good exchange if the project really want to list their token right away then they can choose many shit exchange but don't expect to have trading volume with your token. If the ICO is done, don't expect that it will be listed right away, there's a process that needs to be done and there's a lot of reason not to be listed on just a small exchange, better to ask the developer about their plan on exchange listing.

All depends on the token project, if it is a good project and many investors, tokens will be very easy to get into the sales market and there are some tokens that cannot enter the market because they focus on forming the products they develop so that when they enter the market there are many new investors are familiar with token products so they can generate high prices.

And to reach prices above ICO or IEO is quite difficult if it is not supported by a good market network. Look at coins or tokens that are successful after successfully listing on a large market, it is not an easy matter, there are expensive costs for that and a good strategy from the developer.

I've seen that you really don't have idea what the bounty is all about. Bounty campaign was conducted for the new projects so they'll be able to get traffic or attention about their project so they'll be able to get investment to continuous development of their project,Here's the reason why the bounty projects takes time to enter the market:

• It's an ICO/IEO - meaning that they're just starting project and needed investment so definitely they are not listed on the market since they need more development
• It's a shit project/trash project which is 90% of all the bounties

Here's the top reason why it takes time to enter the market.

Many projects are scam,some are just rushed projects with inexperienced teams and only few projects never waste time in productivity,they stick with their roadmaps plan and get listed as soon as possible

Do you read their Roadmap? Even projects implementing IEO on large exchanges, their projects are established and developed for more than 1 year before being listed. Some projects have to extend ICO time, they will have to change the roadmap and listing time, I think this is completely normal.

When entering the market there's a lots of possible things to happen where developers needs to check if how they can handle things around, serious developers always find ways on how they will be able to work it's not only to be listed but also on how to make the entire project be supported on its entire stayed inside this industry.

The only thing I can think of, is they do not have a good project that can qualify them to be in the top exchange, of course, the fee is one issue, we only know these big exchange charges huge fees just to get in their platform, but they can opt to small exchanges.

Some good projects will still face few delays here and there preparing for a better outcome so the waiting is normal but most times scam projects will seize to continue working on their project

I don't know, but maybe they look the condition of the market. If we're on the bear market, investor can get loss cause the value is decreased. So maybe they hold to enter market and wait till the condition is good again.

So all these you have said, should it take them one year to do? So if they have no exchanges that will dance to their own tune, they will wait for new exchanges to be born and see if their term and condition is going to be favorable, and therefore tying investors money down for eternity till they forget about this? I see this as bullshit, it is just unseriousness from the part of these projects.

Any new project should really not take more than 3 months to do this, because it takes them time to raise this money, and during this time they were using to raise money, they ought to have done their feasibility studies very well and know how the product will take turn before even asking for fund for it. We have too many exchanges on ground they can make research on for us to give those silly excuses that you made mentioned of there.

The big fee is one of the big issues and if they are going to target the big exchanges, chances are they going to be turned down if their project is a copy of existing project because they have very high criteria, exchanges like Binance, Kucoin and Bitrex will only accept coins that will give them volume and credibility.

How could they be able to pay fees to enter the market when reach softcap is hardly even reach. Some projects still goes on knowing they could be a failure leading some investors money wasted. I encounter so many projects, raised a minimum of 1M dollars and then list their coin but it was a total dump. If somehow a project is taking time, they are following their road maps, and if still it takes time then there is the problem with the team, conflicts or somehow did not pay their workers.

Simple. They dont want traders to get in with their introduction.
Once it is listed in exchange then the price could be manipulated.

Who want that if you have an amount of money that needs to be reached.
Example if it is sold for $1 a piece and then dumped by traders until $0.1. How the hell are you going to reach a soft cap or a hard cap with that?
But it aint traders which should be blamed.
If they have the right features then the market of every token should stay.

afraid that dump might make sense, but if it does not make sense for a long time because when I asked the team and the answer was still waiting and waiting, I thought that they were preparing a product to anticipate a dump.

I think the action of dumping bounty hunters is not a serious problem. a large project certainly has the resistance to anticipate it. moreover the bounty hunters if they know a potential project, of course they will still hold the coins to invest

the thing I think about is, many things need to be set back when the ICO, or IEO is finished, especially when their funds don't reach hardcap. of course not only fear of dumps, but they may also develop strategies so that their products can continue to be used, and can be valued on the market. well, that is the best thought I think. of course they are afraid of dumps that make their products worthless.

I think everything is under a step by step procedure. It takes time for a token or coin to be listed after the project is successful. And within this time, developments of the project would be a factor that the token to be listed could give a good value, also if its outcome is good, the project woupd be recognize by several investors.

I think it's a kind of strategy from the project team to reduce the risk of dumps when it enters the market and the quality on the market will remain stable for a long time,And that can be called a possible marketing strategy from the project team

Each exchange has different requirements in each coin listing they will do. There is through voting, some are paid, after that the exchange will definitely carry out a due diligence on the coins to be registered, whether they are feasible or not. I think the process takes a long time, until the coin can be traded in an exchange.

Sometimes the negotiations fail or do not reach an agreement, therefore the developer is definitely looking for other exchanges and this will take longer.

There are a lot of reasons for that, but mainly the greed of team members, because all solid exchanges require a big payment for getting listed and almost no team wants to sacrifice their own profit to enter a great exchange.

the difficult question, is there are several first possibilities so it is difficult to get into exchange because there are too many crypto projects and that makes some exchanges do first due diligence before entering the project and the second problem is "fee" because the entry requirements to the exchange must use that, the rest was due to fault of project who did not submit it because they focused on developing the project.

Most bounty projects are derived from ICOs, and since the market isn't great right now and there's too many ICOs around, very few of them are earning the sums required to proceed with a good exchange listing. This leads to projects either settling for trash exchanges with almost no liquidity, or relying on decentralized platforms.

If a project raises less than $10 million, you can be pretty sure it will list on a trash exchange.

Not only the project conducting bounty programs, even the projects which comes to the market as a ICO also not getting listed in the exchanges.

The projects you are seeing in the exchanges are IEO or got listed after big waiting period to get listed.
Then understand all the exchanges or not good so if the tokens get listed on such kind of cheap exchange means there is no worth for it.

I don't think there is any business with bounty and enter on crypto market. Obviously a projects isn't worry about bounty stake. Because they could pay it later on. Main thing is they wouldn't like to enter on exchange and most of them are not legit enough. Sometimes exchange would ask about legitimacy of projects (except worst exchange).

For the project there is no problem to enter the market if they have collected the desired amount of money. All exchanges with good liquidity require a considerable amount $ for listing and problems can arise only if project does not have the necessary amount of money for this. The main reason of dump is the low liquidity of the exchange and the lack of a buyer.

That is what happens right now. projects do not really care about investors who buy their tokens at the time of ICO / IEO sales. they tell them - hold

Not the right reason to blame the bounty hunter for the cause. How could bountypool for only 1-5% of total sales make them afraid to register on the market early? And most of their efforts are to set the payment schedule so that bounty hunters are delayed even for months but still doesn't change anything.

The most important part is the distribution, if they are etherium based tokens you would be able to trade them on decentralized exchanges and you will not wait for official listing, a token like Miracletele is not officially listed by the developers but is being traded on forkdelta and it is already having some good value, the 1000 tokens I received is worth over $200 at the moment. Official listing is for those still very patient and are willing to wait.

What exactly do you mean by QUALITY MARKET? I don't really think that most of them are afraid of been dump but the remain whether the developers want the coins listed. Other factors could be that they can pay the fees for listing on exchange

To preserve the price.
Since they are selling at a fixed price, they dont want it getting dumped and losing a lot of dollars which could have been in their pockets.

It is natural. The more they rob the better.
I am not saying every ICO does it. But it became so normal.

Most projects, even collecting a hard cap, refuse listing.The whole reason is that if there is no working model of the project,it makes no sense to agree on a listing.All those who do not have a working product and already trading their assets are outright pests of their project.Naturally, everyone will sell such tokens,which do not benefit anyone.Although there is another side of the coin.I know a lot of projects that agree on the listing and eventually buy their own assets from early investors,bounty participants and those who want to sell them.

It narrows down to your taste in bounties. I know a lot of good projects which never took time to get listed and they are doing well in the market. Harmony, morpheus labs, Quarkchain and so many of them. You have to narrow your search to quality projects like these. You can easily find them on the ICOdrops website.

a long time or not is very relative. each project already has a schedule listed in the roadmap. have you studied it before joining?
make it a habit to read it first :) so that we don't get caught up in complaints.
in addition, each project also has its own strategy, it can be waiting for the market situation to be quite profitable if there is a delay.

It's the developer's fault and their inactivity that causes this, they should have made plans to apply for inclusion on a good exchange while the ICO is ongoing, I have this on other ICO, the developers are giving updates on their investors about listing in tje middle of the ICO this is to attract more investors.

Most of the reason is because of the team itself. You don't need to raise too much in ICO in order for your token be listed in the market. If they failed to supply the needed requirements then they'll be rejected; thus their tokens wouldn't be listed. Also, a decent money raised which suits for its platform to get launched is enough for it to be listed and become a competitive altcoin at the same time. Also, the influence or partnership of its team with exchanger CEO is an advantage to boost up wether the volume of their investors or traders.

The only reason they told us when they taking too long to be listed on exchanges is their preparation on something, mostly they told us what's the preparation for but there are bounty projects that don't tell you if they developing something or not.

But if they happen to enter the market with the ICO price then it's worth waiting for. but the only problem about some bounty is they don't update their participant on what is going on with their tokens that's why most of the participants are already losing hope if their coins are gonna listed.

An example you have graduated from senior high school and you will continue your study to university and then the first step that must be done is you have to register after that you will working on the test that has been given by the university. Afterward, the university will see the results of your test and consider whether you are eligible to study at the university or not.

And these things happened in ICO project or for new project, their purpose (developer's project) are same they need their project will be successful listed on the exchange and even many exchange because the exchange of cryptocurrency is not one only. The exchange will act like a university that will select new students. The exchange will see the project itself, such as the potentiality of the project, the function of the project and many more. Because they want a profit when the project has been listing in the exchange.

Guys, let's be honest, Bounty is a tribute to tradition. A good project does not need small investors and the main investment is on closed sale.

You are talking about ICOs and bot about bounty campaign.
Bounty campaign is a marketing way how to attract investors to your ICOs.
And why ICOs are not listed on exchange? Because it cost something and team doesn´t want to pay anything from their money.  :D

The most genuine reason for a delay in most the projects listing on an exchange is due to lack of minimum viable product, and low quality as such getting rejected by a lot of exchanges.

Yes but you invest in ICO to increase your bitcoin. There is no problem supporting a good project but people support crap copy paste scams and they seem to have copy paste in their brain as well meaning the too just do the exact same thing. Keep falling for the same type of scams over and over. Thus copy paste. You are right about projects that take too long without good reason. These projects will try supporters along for as long as possible which is why it takes so long to list their token if at all.

Every bounty project that promotes the ICO projects will always take a certain time to enter the market. Commonly it relates to the roadmap of the project. We may not need to force the team to list their token as soon as possible after the end of the project. We are sure that the team has their effort and certain plan to pick the exchange. Choosing and dealing with exchange is not easy and we must wait for this. However, if we are waiting for a too long time, more than 3 months, we must force them to work harder.

thats true. and that is the authority of the developer. As a bounty hunter, we should understand the roadmap of the project that we support. They must have a sales schedule for tokens up to tradable in the official exchange. We also need to know that every bounty project is different, some start at pre ico even in the middle of crowd sale, etc. So long or not it's very relative. As long as they provide a clear schedule, we only need to be patient.

To enter the exchange, a Bounty project needs to submit a proposal in advance of the intended Exchange, if approved, we are told to pay so that the project can be released in the market.  Some also enter exchanges through voting, and also need to queue from other projects.  So everything needs process and time, and that every Cryptocurrency project varies, some are fast, some are old.

The quality will be applied to the major exchange listing but if you are taking the medium exchange listing and then the majority of medium and small exchange sites are needed money. the how much must be paid by the platform will be a very difficult negotiation. viable product means nothing in this case.

Most of the new projects in the market have no value as they are just repeating or copying what has been in existence. So they are afraid people won't be interested in trading their coin, so they just list in a shitty exchange and allow the coin to gradually die and blame it on the bear market.

If you mean listed on the exchange after ICO, there are many reasons why that happen and one of the reason is that the developer of the projects is not willing to pay the amount needed for listing on big exchange.

Because their speed of development and development on paper does not correspond to the real, with which they move. This happens with 80% of ICO, they do not have the ability or desire to do everything in the set time, and this is very sad.

With small exchanges, they just don't need anything or just very small amount of money to list some coins up.
But the big exchanges, story is different, they need their reputation, listing a coin that has potential to scam investors, or don't really have future, or simply not having enough money to paid them, just makes bad effects to them.

Most times this is just simple preparations and if they rush the team they might end up listing on very low exchanges which will have a negative impact on the tokens,I've seen good projects that delays listing but end up listing on bittrex,delay listing doesnt mean the project is bad or scam

I see that here either they punt bounty with ICO, or discuss what it is that lends itself to my logic)) What does the tokens paid as rewards have to do with the litigation? And how does the listing depend on bounty?

This is exactly what I also feel that they do, and that is why I mostly laugh at people that always advise the rest or condemn anyone that falls into scam project of not doing their diligent research before making investment, no matter the level of research that you conduct, how are you supposed to know that a particular project will do what you said here?

The team might look great, they might have a working product and give lots of promises, but once they fail to enter exchange maybe because of the fear of being dumped, this is own they remain, waiting for the best time, till time passes and people forget about the project, then they too decide to just let it be after they must have receive so much millions of dollars that they cannot even have as profit on the product they claim they wish to sell.

I think because they're project will not do well when listed on exchanges, there's a lot of them few months or even a year that never get listed on a reputable exchange because there's no development and they are also afraid of dumping their token price compare to ICO.

Everybody is speaking from dump and the fact that new projects are afraid of it. Buyback solves any problems and you do not need to be a genius to realise that. Another idea is that listing costs a lot and teams are trying to find a way of making it as cheap as possible.

there's several green ones.
on the one hand it takes a long time until a product is ready for the market. and nobody
develops it in advance. everyone waits for the big ico money and only then starts.

and the next point is the fight with the stock exchanges. they need some lead time to list projects.
and it also costs a lot of money which many cannot afford.

I'm sorry for making a generalization here but if a project is having a hard time getting listed on an exchange, it simply goes to show that they are not exerting enough effort, not good enough, or not willing to release some funds. If they do not release funds for a decent exchange listing, or are pending everything because they are afraid of a dump by bounty hunters, again, it means the project is not good enough.

Great projects are even listed right away by huge exchanges. Great projects make sure their coins are accessible by investors through exchanges. Great projects do not dump by a mere fraction of sells by bounty hunters.

The truth is?Most of those project that make bounties are scammers and only few are legit so don’t be surprised that 90-98% of those will hardly get into market and some will gone just that.

Bounty nowadays are worthless as well because aside from not paying the advertisers others pay worthless tokens ..

Project development entails a whole lot of process and listing on exchanges is also one of the things that can crush a project if not carefully planned. Most projects also want to develop the projects so that the tokens have a working product before listing on an exchange. This helps prevent cases of dumping by both bounty hunters and investors who are sometimes disturbed by the volatile crypto market. Some also are not able to list on good exchanges like Binance, Kraken and other popular exchanges because of the high cost of listing price by some of these cryptocurrency exchanges.

I saw many good bounty running. If you have experience selecting bounty then you will definitely find some good bounty at the present time.

in my opinion, many considerations were made by management before deciding to enter the market. it is possible that the funds that are owned are not enough to be able to compete with other altcoins, or must have certain conditions to be able to enter the market.

Any token needs liquidity.Accordingly, there is no point in listing if there is no liquidity.Listing on the exchange is entitled only to project whose tokens are in demand.

It is not really because they are afraid of being dumped, rather I would say that they lack proper planning and that listing on good exchanges these days require a lot, which they (the project team), might not be able to fulfill at that time. Which is why they still wait to see if it will be possible.

Ah, but the fact they were not doing it. Majority of them have not yet cooperated with the exchange site and that's why they need more time to sign a form the exchange site to list the token. This is will be different compared with a trusted one who has gained direct support from the exchange site itself. Know the differences is much better.

And how long would it take them to really do that, if there is any newbie in the industry today, I am not so sure that it would take the newbie more than few minutes to really spot out great exchanges, so I do not think that it should be an excuse for them not to really enter the exchange market on time.

If you say that is the case, why are we still then having projects that have almost spent 2 years after their campaign and yet they have still not entered any exchange?

If there is any project that takes more than 6 months to really enter exchange, I just start seeing them as a scam project already and I don’t think that it would really worth to start waiting for them any longer. Any serious projects should have even prepared for all these before they start campaign because the cost of listing should also form part of their project quotation.

There two types of crypto projects! One depends on bounty promotion and another depends on their quality. For example, I asked in the Lition group that do you have any plan to come through a bounty promotion, they said we don't need any further promotion. After the sale, Lition coin listed on exchange and price went huge up, every investor earned good money.

Another type of projects, who need bounty promotion even if they have potential too. I don't know why they do late to list on the exchange, maybe because of the hunter's dump!

Probably you are right. But there are single projects that inspire confidence. BUZZSHOW for example. They have been tormenting investors for the second year now and have just recently announced their listing

When most projects do not wait for the market to be good before they join an exchange, the price normally dumps and it takes a log time for it to revive again. That is the main reason why they delay before entering the market.

The main reasons are dumping bounty rewards and the delay regarding getting listed on exchange. Bounty hunters don't respect the bounty terms and they look for the quick solutions which are usually dumping the bounty rewards. Entering the market doesn't guarantee the volatile market activity and required liquidity for not getting delisted by the exchange administration.

In addition, it could be part of the plan in the roadmap, as bounty hunters we must know their targets. Suppose the bounty finishes in March, then the schedule for listing is December, there is nothing we can do, if it is part of the roadmap, we can only be patient. Is not it?
what needs to be questioned is if the listing schedule does not match the roadmap, always delay, be prepared to be patient and tolerate for longer. Always positive.

Those that are legit and have a serious team get it done at the right time. This time around, most of the projects are I initiated by fake team who do not even want to spend a dime on listing on legit and moderate volume exchanges because they know what they are in for and besides, they have already gotten something to leave the project dead.
Although some exchanges have a period set aside to read through the project, listing on an exchange shouldn't take more than 3 months if you are indeed in to help the crypto industry with your product.

It is a big problem. Thankfully somethings are being done. Tokpie allows users to be paid swiftly and even ahead of time. The projects enter the markets very quickly and bounty pay for stakes happens quickly.
The projects tokpie support have all been very good. There are some very good projects if you take your time to do the proper research. Remember to find a good bounty you only need to do research once so it is worth it.
Other ideas I have heard of are from altcointalks and they allow you to be paid in their own token as collateral if the ICO/IOE fails.

Dumping is a common scenario but the most probable reason is the status performance of the current market in which it is really unwise to unlock the coins in an unhealtly environment. As during bearish that even how beautiful is the project plarform is still mostly are preferred to sell than to invest in long term making the Altcoin price to become cheap.

First of all budget, of course exchange will list only projects that pay and some of those good exchanges have huge required payment. Bounty projects doesnt mean the price will dump eventually cause there are lots of hunters know as well if the price is worth holding or not. I think those who dump coins are just need money and wanted to rip they worked for but no need to blame them if the project is really good then thr price will be still stable.

I think that will depend on regulations in every exchange because I am sure that every exchange will have different rules to accept the new project in their lists. That is why the projects need to wait for some time and not because of the dump that will happen in that market. Besides that, the project needs to prepare its time to be ready to enter the market. And I think the exchanges itself, there is a queue time for every new project that wants to be added in their list.

Not all bounty tokens take long to enter into the market, though most of the project don't get listed on high quality exchange like binance and others. The market they list may not be able to increase the trading volume and price of the tokens. I believe that with time the volume will increase and they'll be more exchange listing. Let's not give up on the newly established projects.

Because many projects don't have a plan and they just start off with a ANN and a bounty and they lose their track. You have to look hard to find projects with potential. Even then they take time to distribute the bounty tokens and rightly so.

Most projects were developed in a hurry and worthless way. They only try to advertise to attract investors to sell their tokens, after which they often abandon the project. Some of the currencies may be listed on the exchange but will depreciate very quickly.

Exactly, I don't like investing in ICO projects because it's too risky. BTC is still the safest choice we can look forward to investing. It is actually better than other coins and tokens.

I  do disagree with people when they use dumping as an excuse for these projects not to enter the market, it means they are all cowards, what do they except? You presented a project to them based on the store of value of I and not from the usability angle, and when it comes to store of value, it is not tied to a particular time frame, anyone has the right to tie the exact time he feels his investment has yielded profit enough for him to take out and can do so at any time.

If a project is solid, no matter the dumping, it would always bounce back every time it is being used for the purpose for which it was created, but that purpose is what this project does not fully follow up to ensure that most of the community that they have are the ones that will always use the product more rather than holding.

Not bounty project take time for listing on market, but ICO owner is not trusted about what have they promise at the first time with listing after ICO success and ended.

That is why many investors do not like ICO right now, there are many promises at the beginning after that, delaying for some time.

The problem that occurs in new projects for listing on exchangers is the listing fee. Most new projects do not want to spend too much money on listing fees on exchangers so many new projects prefer smaller exchangers because of this factor.

I don't think the issue is peculiar to bounty projects, but rather to new projects. Most projects going through the ICO and IEO stages find it difficult to list on cryptocurrency exchanges due to the listing fees which in most cases are quite expensive, coupled with the fact that they struggle to meet up with their softcap which may not have made provision for listing fees on good exchange.

There are 2 factors you should know.
The first one is a listing fee and a time which exchange needs to put the token on exchange - up to few weeks.
Secondly, many projects want to develop the platform before listing to give a token a real value.

I think the reason why bounty projects are take time before entering to market because they also study and have some research before to launch it to prevent errors. Like other business bounty projects need some feasibility study to stay away from loss and to know if their project will become feasible so because as a investor also no one will want to waste money,time and effort.

Holding a bounty campaign has nothing to do with this. Most likely this is due to the market situation.
You must understand that in order for a project to be developed at all, it needs financing. Therefore, there are people who invest in developing and supporting the project. In turn, the project has certain obligations to its investors. And of course, in such a situation on the market, projects cannot earn enough money to achieve their goals and fulfill their obligations to investors. Therefore, they try to stretch the time as much as possible until the tokens are listed on the exchange.

The most obvious reason is the ICO has not raised enough funds to afford listing on quality exchange or the platform is not yet ready to enter the market because its not yet fully functional or just simply waiting the right time base on the project roadmap. Bounty campaign is just part of the marketing strategy or promotion and its not the reason why it takes time before being listed to any exchange.

Do not compare quality and scammers. If the team is strong, it makes a good plus even with the bounty. Please, do not think that if a project has a distribution, the project is doomed. On the other hand, it attracts new users.

Bounty projects or projects take time to enter a market, because a project depends a lot of things such as- management, investor, arrangement, distribution, study and research their project how to lead as better than others etc.

I think why Bounty project don't enter the market are, if they don't get good investors and the developers aren't good enough to project them, then most of the projects already have in mind that once they hit exchange and distribute rewards for Bounty, the Hunters go straight to dump affecting them

It is not about the bounty project or what.
It is always on the team and their plans.
Being listed in any exchange is an effort from the team to be listed.
They will decide also where to be.

Because some good exchanges requiring huge sums for a listing and this is normal. Binance listing is worth around 1 million USD. Moreover, you need to get through tons of requirements for a token to get listing on a solid exchange.

I don't think this apply to all cases. There are a lot of projects out there that hosted bounties but didn't take long to get listed on solid and reputable exchanges. A prime example of this is Harmony One project. They got listed on Binance even while the bounty was still going on. I dare to say, this depends entirely on the projects and the team. A good project will always keep to their timeline and roadmap and list on exchanges accordingly.

And yet the influence of regulatory authorities is having an effect. All the same, exchanges are primarily interested in profit, and secondly, they are interested in the legality of transactions (at least something like this). Now, unfortunately, exchanges can be held liable if they are involved in fraudulent fundraising.

Listing on exchanges these days is highly competitive. Yes, a project can list on any, but such exchange might not be on CMC, let alone being a global exchange that has good 24 hours volume. If any listing will be allowed, then it had to fulfill some criteria and this differs from individual exchanges. However if the project is good, then finding a good exchange will be much easier.

I often see projects like that for example invox. invox started its success in ico in 2018 and until now the market has not been listing in the market. The developer said that he wanted to build a stronger project to enter the market so that the token value would not fall from the initial price

its too long if since 2018 this projects not listed in any market yet.investors will disappointed with developers team decision postponed listing.they spend alot of money in order to get profits in short time, but the fact totally different now.

I think it's not the dump issue, it's very foolish to think for developers that their coins will be dump, if that's the case then they better not do a bounty campaign anymore, one of the reason is they don't want to spend big money listing in big exchange and second they do not have the qualifications to get listed.

Little easy to launch project and have own token or coin but so difficult to get natural demand and trust from investor,that is make different project with another project. Its not only pump and dump but how great the project. Everything is need planing. And good exchange also have their own criteria to listing token or coins.

i find so many project also have this strategy (lock tokens) and delaying distribution around 6 months. It sad if they already use this strategy but the price still dumped so hard. Developers need more good planing and make natural demand.

There's a lot of reason why they are having hard time entering the market. It make sense why they have bounty campaign, cause this method is an effective and cheaper way of promoting the project. A token dumps maybe it doesn't have potential to be good and nice platform. As an investor and trader, you should feel how good is the project. Bounty shouldn't be blame for being dump on the market. If a project really is worth something people wouldnt mind selling their asset.

To be honest, I think that I need to rush the listings with the project. It does little good. I also understand the bounty hunters. They want to get their money for the project as quickly as possible.

Exchange listing will vary on how the project team will strive for it.Some might not really care too much or just simply its hard for a project to get listed because they do lack out of support and liquidity no matter how hard they do try to get listed on good exchangers thats why we do commonly see them on non popular exchangers instead.About bounty hunters dump it isnt really that serious matter to look on yet the main dumpers is to those investors who do able to get in early and have some big discounts and bonuses.Come to think that bounty allocations is mostly 1%-2% Max of total coin supply.
How they would consider out this as a main factor of dump?

A bounty hunter, who always asking "When exchange" don't know the policy "How to listed a coin into the exchange"

Man, you should learn this. It's basic information, not all cryptocurrency can be listed to the exchange they must be passed some a due diligence from the exchange first. It's not always about the fee, exchange was always to make sure the project, not a scam/fraud. Here the step "Listed a cryptocurrency to the exchange"

• Contact Exchange
• Negotiation
• Due Diligence About The Project & etc.
• Auditing the token/coin
• Payment Fee Listed
• Waiting for the listed Information from the Exchange
• Finaly the token/coin was listed on an exchange

Not easy to pass them all, a reputation exchange was really have a strict policy & due diligence.

Yes, you are right because the ICO company must to do some process to register their coin to several exchange market and must pay some fee to the exchanger site and need many preparation for launch to the public.

i think the best reason behind it is the project want to ensure that the price would not dump so hard when the investors are still trading first on the token or coin . They are just ensure that the investors will not disappointed on what they are doing.

Bounty Project? do you mean a project that holds a bounty? The length of time a project enters the market is not seen from the bounty, but is seen from the seriousness of the team in developing the project

It is mostly the financial aspect that normally cause this delay,  most project could barely raise enough money to carry out development of the project which is mandatory,  paying listing fees whith such limited capital will greatly affect the project development, thus, the team will have to come up with a better alternative that will be best for the project, top exchange don't comes cheap and people always wanted to see project list on top exchange. There are other factors that could also cause delay.

I think because most projects don't have any working product to offer and if they will list it on exchanges the price will surely drop and their resources for product development will go down, it will then lead to bankruptcy the project will be abandoned and fail.

Why asking bounty project for the listing?
It is always the decision of the team project. they have the  road map for that.
many team are looking on the down market that is why they dont want to enter the exchange due to low demands.

Most of them are shitcoins and only get reasonable appreciation during a bull market

First, they have scheduled it on road map. Second, the project may be less desirable or their service product does not pass to list a famous exchange, so the team needs time to think or register on a bad exchange.

Mostly as a result of low sales during IEO or ICO and this is always as a result of project repetition, fake developers, greed ti make gains at the detriment of the project and lot more. Projects most times, find it very difficult to sustain trade volume even after listing due to the fact that the project is worthless. There are so many reasons behind delay in listing, which ranges from the fear of price dump, low capital to list, poor marketing team, stringent conditions of some prominent exchanges

Every Bounty project has no difficulty entering the store and especially for large exchanges. Entering the exchange also requires a fee that does little. However, exchanges also do not want to receive easily on the company. There are many requirements that the company should be able to run. Exchange does not want when there is a fake company.

maybe for ICO project, there will be a delay on listing, and the reason is not because the project run a bounty campaign during the crowdsale mate
sometimes the team think if the market is not good enough to add their project on exchange  ;)
but not for IEO project my friend, because IEO project will automatically tradeable on exchange after the IEO done

I don't think is bounty project that time to enter exchange market. My observations point to project doing ico. Some of them after collecting huge sum you wunt even hear from them for a very long time. Mean while any serious project with great team irrespective of Bounty they will enter market in due time it doesn't necessarily mean because they did bounty dey start delaying.

But the question was about taking time to enter the market. The main reason for that is exchanges don't want to list weak coins without proven and popular teams and lots of marketing. Listing is usually expensive so they need time to get enough funds and even when they have enough they prefer to wait and see if the project is popular enough.

The listing policy is clear enough why new projects are afraid to apply for listing on the best exchanges. Teams don't like to pay for the listing which takes weeks for weak projects, the lucky projects have never faced with many documental requirements way back to 2017. There are smaller exchanges that happily agree to list the new projects but it carries risks which can be paid with the reputation of the exchange.  The well-known exchanges never list the small projects from my experience, they also need liquidity providing traders in all altcoin pairs.

Projects these days in general, do take some time to enter the market due to the fact that there are too many shitcoins so exchanges take some time in screening them to prevent its users from buying shitty coins. Also, the devs of late do not want to pay much to list in better exchanges so they wait to get listed in exchanges that list for free.

simple, because it is difficult to attract the interest of investors and traders in this saturated market. If the tokens want to get the most attention from investors and traders, the project must be of high quality and able to list on global exchanges. If not, it will be difficult to develop prices, especially in local exchanges that are less interested.

The reason is the developer themselves. They are too afraid to spend any money on the exchange site and don’t want to spend money from their pockets. More often then not the coins or tokens are worthless if you think of, the developers are trying to collect as much fund as they can so they charge more.

Quite right, most companies that making bounties are afraid to list their tokens on exchanges because they think there will be a price dump due to bounty hunters, but we have studied this topic many times and not in all cases the price of a token falls due to bounty hunters , but it’s very difficult for companies to prove it, because there are such people sitting there who are also interested in getting profit from their project and when they decide to list tokens on the exchange by themselves.

Firstly most ICO projects nowadays are worthless and scams, you have to spend a long time researching for a good project. Second, the whole crypto market is still down and it is affecting also the ICO industry. Third, many projects focus first on the development of their products before the listing process.

To be registered in Exchange I think it requires a big fee. But for me if this project is real and serious, it may cost great to enter the exchange is not a problem.

They have a grip on the roadmap. The project will be listed in Exchange according to the Roadmap. For me they need time because they need all the preparations, so the price does not go down when it is already in exchange.

There are several successful and complete ICO projects that are directly listed in Exchange. But from the years 2018 to date very rare projects like that.

I dont think that dump is the real reason why they are afraid.
I think that they dont want to pay the listing fee, they have a hard time of spending money on listing , if they know that most likely they will not earn anything and so they spend a lot of time thinking over and researching.

A lot of these bounty projects take time to enter the market because they have a process they have to follow through, I guess. Most of these exchanges, especially the top rated ones would not like to list just any coin on their site. And again, I totally agree with the fact that they might be trying to avoid the massive dumps that usually come after the airdrops.

I think choosing is the best word for that. Choosing what trading site would be nice to add there token.

Since we all know that listing in exchange also has listing fee owner dont want the payment they paid for listing will be wasted.

Other factor is owner of the project dont really have interest to list thier token in the exchange or use delayed tactics so every one will be freeze and see development of the project first before listing it.

Lets be real, most of the "modern" crypto projects that are holding bounty campaigns are vaporwave projects or a quick money grabs with almost no potential for further use and adoption, so it shouldn't be surprising they struggle to list on even mid tier exchanges. The "fear" of dumping is probably one of the least important factors of it, the lack of competence of team members is a much bigger one.

Bounty is free marketing. Because almost all of the projects pay with their own tokens. Since the Tokens are in their own hands, they advertise their products for free.
Most projects say they will distribute token worth $ 500,000. But the actual average is the distribution of token worth $ 50,000. If we're optimistic.
Therefore, almost no project wants to miss this opportunity.

Bounty  hunter  not be trusted  when its come to  tokens  they are  after money  so project  don't trust them. And  the reason why most  project  take long  time to  get their coin or  token listed  is that Crypto  market is not stable right now, also  investors have  limited amount of  money.  but Crypto market has  unlimited coins and tokens so  must  project take their to develop great economics for their  coin or token.   

The reason you give is very appropriate, because almost all project developers are very afraid of spending their personal money when they want to create a token listing in the market, so they use the time to collect as much funds as they can, even though such things are very logical, but they themselves do not dare take that risk.

The consequences of free marketing cause the daily struggles among the bounty hunters and the team also use the free power of the bounty hunters without making any prior payment. Their promised bounty rewards are lower than whatever amount worth of ETH they calculated and the listing on the exchange is delayed with the tricky intentions. This intention can be analyzed with the reason why bounty managers are interested to distribute the bounty rewards many months later than stated week timeframe. 

which clearly aims to develop more advanced projects and reap profits when the market is on the rise. other than that waiting for the right momentum to avoid dumping and the project does not stop.

We can not blame the projects for not being listed. First of all, they have their own roadmap, and we should support them if the market situation is not appropriate for listing.
In fact, I do'nt think it is free if developers value their coins. We can not think of the opposite, at least considering the money invested for the project. Many projects evaluate their coins more valuable, and instead pay rewards with ETH.

Never enter a bounty which is an already listed on an exchange. Because you know that you will be able to trade them.

I think the reason is always the same - lack of funds, if we are talking about normal honest projects. Few people want to invest in altcoins today, especially in new ones, and this is exactly what bounty projects offer. And without investment, listing on a good exchange is not possible (listing on a bad exchange is tantamount to death).

This can be answered from different sides, first almost all projects conducts bounty and their listing totally depends on what the team wants not necessarily about being afraid of dump; some will list and still lock bounty tokens or delay the distribution, so I don't think it's all about bounty. On the other hand, from the little experience, any project finding it difficult to list shows most times that it is a scam project; in this case the team will start giving excuses as to why they are yet to list.

I never joined any of them too, most of them have no volume at all.
If the token is already listed on an exchange so what is the marketing advertisement is all about?
Why they need it and pay for bounty hunters? they are looking for another dump?

Most bounty projects now are delaying the payment if not they are locking the tokens.
Most people in bounty campaigns are deceiving by the team project now.

I think we have a very different scenario to what we had in 2015/2017 and that is a plethora of more projects entering the market and a ton more bounty hunters trying to get a slice of the Pie than when I first started a few years ago when there were just a few hundred of us doing these gigs. Now every Tom, dick, and Harry wants to participate and when you got like 3k people trying to enter a telegram bounty they end up with very few tokens for their work and also most of the tokens don't get listed on exchanges or even a decent exchange, so are deemed worthless. Then again you get some relaly consiencious project owners that relaly want to succeed in this niche and work hard to get on good exchanges, but often it takes a long time, maybe several years. The market sentiment and demographics have changed dramatically since 2018.

The only reason that why tokens (not scams) takes too much time to get listed is lack of Support.
By support it doesn't only means technical support but also financial and management. Many projects dies before entering into the market due to lack of good support. Along with the technical side team should also need to focus on financial backup and marketing.

That is why people prefer IEOs rather than investing in ICOs or even STOs. When they do not know which exchange that project will be on, they think of not investing in becasue they need to make agreements with exchanges and it takes really long time. IEOs came out just because of this reason, I can't say all are safe, but I think safer than ICOs.

The easy way out, thats what they are seeking for
They are trying to avoid dump by waiting for the best time to get listed, mostly when altcoins is surging or when we are in bullrun season, i don't blame them cos nobody wants to end up losing, just have patience with such projects for sometime if the project has good team they will end up listing on exchange

It is because they nees enough money of fund first before entering the market. Exchanges has a high listing fee, and their token cannot be listed instantly it tooks weeks or months. Having a soft cap I think can't be enough, they need to fund to their projects first before they will put their tokens in exchanges.

 well, in my opinion its not peculiar to only projects who do bounty , there are still some projects who organize bounties and still get listed and traded successfully  and there are other projects who do not do bounty yet they cant get listed .

i think this your opinion comes from the fact that  you are a bounty hunter and most of the bounty rewards are still in your wallet not yet listed . lol. 

 like in said i would not attribute inability to list to bounty rather it has to do with the Team and how serious they are with their projects.

What about those projects that achieved all needed funds in ICO and IEO that still have one delay after the other? this isn't the case for every project that haven't get listed on exchange cos they all have their different reasons, most are waiting for market recovery and some are still finding ways to avoid dumps

I think this is just an excuse for developers to make it a problem in choosing an exchange, because in my opinion if the project they are running is very good and the quality is very high they don't need to be afraid of having a dump or draining their personal money to register their coins in exchange, because by registering it for a good exchange, I am sure their coins will not be bad in the exchange, so investors believe that the coins they develop are very good and very high for the exchange price, so for the price of the coin itself there will not be a very large risk of dumping in the exchange.

Because many projects who do bounty are not professional and they just treat bounty hunters ver well at first, then they kick them out of group when they ask bounty. Because they are not experienced, they cannot find any exchange to be listed on so they make people wait. We have to research about the team first and then join their bounty campaigns.

As a result of declining confidence, many people are not sure to invest in new altcoin and in my opinion this is a natural thing to happen. and now when we see a lot of projects that have died. trading volume doesn't even exist. no buy order. Can we call it as a project?

Making your own bounty projects has a lot of requirements and there are lots of things you need to consider. The first one is the project team itself, who are the people that will be a CEO or a manager of the project. After that, you should move as one and then you should have a meeting on what you should do when they launch the project, you should provide an informative and legit whitepaper that shows the information about the project itself. And that also includes the roadmap in which you can do for the next couple of months or years when they actually launch it. It is difficult and more difficult since the market is on a downfall.

In this time with current market condition, I see almost projects that have bounty program are ICO, not IEO. But ICO is dying, they can't raise fund through this way, and it's the reason why they are constantly delayed in listing on exchanges.

but for some time ago this happened in some projects, they provided a target market list but they did not fulfill it in this sense I am talking that the planned target was not appropriate. and for now there are indeed many projects that fail to enter the market list because several ways to enter a stock exchange require a lot of funds and also assistance from large communities and for current projects it is difficult to get that right

Many ICO projects fail because many are disliked by investors and the community, ICO sales are difficult to predict and rarely reach softcap, for example the CMA project can be said to be a failure because the funds can not reach the target and even though it has been listed at IDAX, Forkdelta and Felixo keep the tokens into rubbish of no value, and the project is difficult to develop on the exchange.

Due to the mass production of scam projects, investors started to avoid investing in ICO.
This becomes the primary reason why most of the projects were not able to enter in any exchange, they lack allocated funds due to insufficient numbers of investors.

Bounty projects need enough funding in the market fromico or ieo markets then only we can expect these projects to get launch in exchangers

Some possibilities why bounties are difficult to enter the market :
- Developers are still afraid to enter the market because the fundamentals are not strong enough
- it's hard to work with the exchanger let alone the top 20 coin marketcap exchanger
- developers only make promises and some time later they leave the project like Ingot coin (scam)

I guess that is because they cannot give the liquidity solution of their token.
Different with good project, a good project won't have liquidity problem because they are ready to become market maker,
not afraid to be listed on multiple exchanges.

In my opinion, it is difficult for ICO projects to enter the market because tokens are not valuable, and what about the projects that are delivered, the absence of investors and demand which then makes it difficult to pay for exchanges. And that will have an impact on the people who participated in the project because the tokens obtained are worthless and only fill the wallet.

Yes, so i think the only reason is the fund required, not much projects can afford it. Futhermore, the recent crypto market volatility is difficult to predict, many of their projects do not want to be listed to avoid affecting their token prices.

Some of these bounties considers the over all market conditions of the market particularly bitcoin thus the fear of entering the market in an inappropriate market conditions especially in a bearish season because of the tendency of the coin to be dumped thereby turning it worthless, in fact a coin named GLDY reached Soft Cab since early 2018 till now they have not enter the market citing one in genuine reasons or the other personally I viewed the whole scenario as they are probably observing the situation of the market just to avoid dumping the coin by hunters and investors thus tuning it worthless.

sometimes a project that is difficult to enter a market that has a good volume because the community and their income does not match expectations plus the coins produced do not pass the testing of a market. and those rights that make bounty participants and investors who invest in them wait for the market list. plus if they can enter the market list, it usually starts from the market with a small volume because it does not fit the big market criteria. so your analysis must be more powerful to determine the project for you to join as a bounty campaign participant

there were two option for this condition.maybe they prefer to focus on product developtmen rather than listing in any exchanges.or maybe wait the best moment when market recovered.postpone listing be best way to avoid price dumping.investor need to be patient in this moment when their token still postponed in exchanges .

I think this is a lack of funds, Because the listing fee is expensive and if they are not raised enough in the ICO they will probably have a Token Sale which will take longer to list the Token on the Exchange. And it often happens that they are preasured by bounty hunters and investors to list them immediately. So they can list the token on the shit exchange which will further drain their funds and eventually become a scam. Because the funds are running low and there is no buyer in the token sale as prices fall further on the exchange and on decentralized exchange.

I think the reasons why bounty projects takes time to enter the market because most of them are scams that they pretend that they are making or doing process for them not to be noticed by investors and other participants in the project. Other reason is because some projects are unsuccessful that they are lack of funds and did not fulfill their goal for them to be approved or to get listed in the market.

Those projects have limited funds therefore it is needed for them to raise money for competing in the market. This process needs a some period of time and it depends on how many angel investors will come to them. Though there some that doesn't bother to be enlisted in the market because they believed they've lost already or they might just be scammers that are after the investor's money.

It takes a lot of process, crypto market is a well mannered market that's why they make sure that all of the tokens entering it is well observed and processed so that most of the people investing on it wouldn't have a hard time on exchanging it and will recieve higher profits if possible. You cannot blame the crypto market from being too strict about it, it is all about safety and avoidance of scams, most of the things that gives the most benefits really takes time same thing goes with the tokens that takes up a long process before being listed on exchanges.

one reason could be because exchanges ask for high fee when adding their token. but teams losing opportunity due to bounty hunters dumping the first before the investors could is disappointing especially because they privately invest to make arrangements and then them not profiting from the very start of trading will not earn them friends. i guess the old projects who did an ico back 2016 knew realized it already.

The point is not only in high commissions that require the exchange for listing coins of projects.
The fact is that not every project deserves a listing at least on a medium-sized exchange, so such projects go on weak exchanges and get what they deserve: poor liquidity and low prices both from investors and from bounty hunters. The stronger the project, the more demand for its idea, the more exchanges will want it.

But the investors who invested in the early stage of project, many of them can not wait, when they have to wait maybe up to years to receive something from their money. In that case, project need an official announcement with the exact time, as well as the exchange they want to list, instead of just being "very soon" as many projects are doing now.

It is because they prefer quick profit even if it's just a small profit, rather than waiting for the project to develop and make more improvements.

Most of the project wasn't even able to achieve on entering an exchange also because of this reason, they always make everything in a rush because they want their money back immediately.

Most are not afraid of a dump, but that they don’t have enough money to implement their project. Fees are going very poorly in all areas of new projects, no matter whether it is finance or infrastructure.
Now there is a strong outflow of people from the crypto market, which means only a well-built marketing strategy is able to help the project both raise funds and attract the community.

Since I started bounty hunting, I have participated in over 1000 bounties and I can boldly say that this assumption is incorrect, the speed at while a project lists on an exchange doesn't have a direct link on whether they conducted a bounty campaign or not, projects generally list when they want to irrespective of bounty campaigns, they could delay bounty distribution and this is what most of them do.

Wow, that's a lot of bounties there that you have taken part. Yes, about the delay of distribution. I've seen those bounty hunters that have complained about this before. While the investors of that specific token, they've already a way to trade it and sell it to those exchanges that they have listed it. As for the developers, they really should be the one accountable for that. Listing it and making the coins liquidity is their job.

these are the order of thinking :

1. devs want money from investor
2. devs make project to attract investors
3. devs get money
4. the project runs, investor wants good exchange
5. entering good exchange needs much money
6. devs need money, not pay/ spend money
7. yeah never list on good exchange, investor dissapointed, dump that coins
8. coins become absolutly TRASH

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5163563.msg52835331#msg52835331
I don't even think that is the reason for projects not entering an exchange because for us to even be talking of exchange, the project must have even passed through the phase of raising fund, we all know already that no project will enter exchange if they don’t raise fund first because it is the money that they raise as fund they use in paying for exchange fee, but I think the ones we are more concerned about here are the projects that has already raised fund and they still refuse to enter an exchange.

Do you know how many projects that you have done on the past and gotten their token, which till now, none of them have even entered an exchange? The main reason why they have not entered exchange is what we are discussing, which I think it is because of scam or fear of being dumped.

Not really. If the project is well financed and has a good stand with or without bounty, they can be listed. It's not exchanges dont trust project with bounty its just that most bounty projects arent that good enough to get listed though dont have enough funds, cause listing isn't cheap on good exchange, plus maybe there is no good working product yet which some also consider.

Most projects do this, i have seen projects of two years ago that start development after the longest wait, i have few tokens in my wallet and the projects are still active on their media channels but no plan to follow roadmap yet, not all of them can be classified as scam yet because of the delays

Projects generation, except those who at the initial stage of launching, find it challenging to list on good exchanges. Exchange listing is easy, but not for all. They can easily list their tokens on any exchange, but there might not be volume,  which will make hunters to complain more. So it is better to have a standard project that will attract a standard exchange.

Yes, many bounty projects take too much time to list their coins. My more than 80% of bounty coins are yet to list on exchanges. I feel the main reason for delaying the listing would be a bearish market. I believe most of the dev is waiting for the market like in late 2017 or If they launch their coins in the current market they are afraid of been dumped by the investors and holders. Apart from this some dev launch their coins after implement their whitepaper plans. 

Everything is simple. The vast majority of projects that conduct bounty companies do not raise enough funds. In this regard, they simply do not have enough resources to implement the project and enter the exchange. And those who still manage to enter the exchange instantly receive a price drain from investors or bounty hunters if the capitalization is very small.

Most of the time, the problems that they encounter is to where to list their coin in the market. Regarding this, if they cannot keep track of their road map and the funds needed to be collected, they need to adjust the time in order to be listed. I've encountered so many projects that results into 3 months and above, and still not yet listed even if their roadmap already dictates it so, that is because of the lack in support and funds as mentioned above.

All of these reason is because of the growing competition between projects in the market that diversify the support needed by them in order to continue.

in my opinion, because they want the project to be known to many investors and they want money from investors. they will definitely need time for investors to be interested in joining their project. after they get money from investors, investors will definitely want a good exchange. as time went on, the project would enter the market. I think all the processes that make a project take time to enter the market are not because they are afraid of dumping.

It could be one of the main reason why those IEO or ICO with bounty project took hard days and takes months before entering a market. Also, entering an echanges requires minimum of 2BTC for just only a two pair (eth/btc) that is why they need to have a larger amount of sales firsr so that they could have money to put in many exchange and larger ones.

This is the common reason why projects can't list their token on exchange after token sale since they have a limited budget, the project owner chooses to use the funds for development instead of spending it on listing in a good exchange. Other possible reason is that they intentionally delay the listing to avoid price dump or maybe conduct another round of token sale to gather more funds.

Usually after the ico sale is completed, of course the developer still needs a lot of time to approach the exchanger, prepare for the next promotion, planning the project in accordance with their Roadmap for the future, and of course it will require quite a long time. With careful preparation this will certainly make the project will continue to grow and have a good future so that later when their tokens are registered will have a stable prices rate.

Possible reasons that I can think of:

• Perhaps the project hasn't raised the needed money to get listed on an exchange.
• The project is not fully completed and still on the development phase.
• Teams are afraid that when they released it, dumps will follow, they learned their lessons early in 2018.
• They know that we are still in the bearish trend, so timing is very bad.
• Partners leaving the project itself, as a result project is put into limbo.

It's because to enter a market the projects have to pay a listing fee and it's not cheap for big exchanges.
Also the project needs to fund their people and buy the operational needs to develop the the projects.
It's better to make the projects running great firs before it enters market rather than it enter market but with a trash price

It is not like that, the prices of altcoins are automatically dump once it's been released to the market, the reason why it takes time for a bounty project to enter the market is because of the exchange where they are planning to list it, they are making a deal with the owner of that certain exchange and close it before they officially list that certain token to their exchange, this is always been done professionally, they cannot just paid the exchange and it will be on it in an instant.

instead there is a voting system to enter the market list, and it is free, if a large market does need a large amount of money but a large market does not carelessly put coins into their market list, and I agree if their project focuses on first development because it is very important according me, only investors can be patient or not keep their tokens or coins

In the most cases you participated in a wrong bounty campaign that is not going to pay you, or pay you (in tokens) but they will not pay for exchange listing, so you will not have a chance to sell your tokens.  :'(

It all depends on the developers some project list on a big exchange immediately after conducting their bounty while others take some mcuh time to list on an exchange.  I believe it all boils down to funding.  Those project with adequate funding tends to list quick on an exchange while those with little funding tends to delay listing on an exchange while they take out time to source for funds from Angel investors

WHY DOES BOUNTY PROJECTS TAKE TIME TO ENTER A MARKET ?
There is no general reason behind any bounty project to delay their project trading exchange listing.
Some might be having financial problem as regards the big exchanges fees.
some might be pure scam that are not even interested in listing of their project no matter how much they raised in ICO.
Some might be waiting for better market price or favorable market conditions before listing.
The problem differs but it is advisable to research the project you are involving before promoting it.

developers team maybe have their own decision and consideration.for first reason maybe funding be their problem.they have less money to pay listing fee in good exchanges,meanwhile for second layer they worry if token price dropped.and another reason they prefer to focus development and delivering products.once again it also depend on market condition..

Many considerations for a project before entering the market. One of them is funds that need to be provided for listing on exchangers. Some exchangers charge a large fee for listing and this new project is a burden because they also need large funds to develop their products

Most of the time the problem would be the project handlers themselves. Most of them does not know how to make sure that their promises are on track. There could be some times in which the project takes too long for it to reach the market but some time there could be some sort of delaying in giving to bounty hunters. I'm saying this because I think you're a bounty hunter. They are somewhat delaying it because of bounty hunters.

Bounty hunter should not be a reason to delay listing in the market. Every project must have a roadmap and one of them is a listing on the exchanger and should if the project is good, there will be no fear if there is dumping in the market

Paid, There was an exchange but the value was low and the rest was out of value. That's the truth now in almost every bounty so let's not expect that we will ever make a big profit here, This is a new season and we will never be able to bring back the gold memories of 2017 and early 2018.  Where our Bounty income give us to buy a home and build our own business.

I highly doubt that's true for most projects.  Their aim is to get investor money, enrich themselves, and leave everyone else in the dust.  Most of them don't care about their token because it's just a carrot to entice investors *and* bounty hunters.

Exchanges have gotten wise to this scheme, which is why you don't see reputable ones listing shit tokens anymore.  Why should they waste their time on something that has over 90% chance of being a scam?  The answer is, they don't. 

If only potential investors and bounty hunters would get this message, the whole space would be cleared of scammers and might actually evolve into something good.

Because the majority of them is just greedy. Lets take an example if a project has collected around 5 million USD during their token sale and instead of investing 1 million into Binance listing, they are getting listed on Latoken, Probit and other shitty exchanges for peanuts.

Most of the reasons are from the project team. This team comprises of the project managers till the project  marketers. Many project have no roadmap to follow while others just bounce into the system to carryout their hilarious scam exit. Sincerely speaking, most of these projects make a lot of money from their ICO and IEO but will not list on a good exchange after the end of their IEO and ICO, many other things also contribute. 

There is no doubt in this that most of the projects are created just to attract investors because everyone knows how hot a topic crypto currencies are at present. Everyone wants to become just part of digital market so they go for new easy projects but eventually face loss. Once new projects get good amount of investment, they cannot care less about the customers. Therefore, it is stupid to choose new options when we have bitcoin.

Sometimes the project that just aiming a market and entering a low volume markets will experience a big drop, since they're still not running their product, they just want for more investor's money and not developing their project.
It's not good for crypto environtment because they are not develeoping anything but just selling their useless tokens

I think most new projects that have already distributed bounty rewards are waiting for good market season before getting listed on exchange, i can't say i like this though but its for everyone sake as well, it would be a fair win win, airwallet willingly take things slow to enter 2020 for good market season

They are taking their time to evade this present bad market season, there will be rush like 2017 if altcoin season returns but since its no where to be find for now many projects put their listing on halt, my judgment about this projects is they are not good enough, few projects came out this year and still listed on big exchanges

many reasons why projects are hard to enter the market:

1. devs dont wanna pay for entering market

2. they just wanna steal money from investor so they dont care about project progress (in this case entering market)

3. the project does not meet the criteria for entering good market ( bad project, low volume, etc)

There are projects out there that didn't conduct any bounties but still didn't enter any cryptocurrency exchanges fast, it's not just limited to projects that conducted bounty campaigns, have you considered that if it's because if the bounty, they could just postpone bounty payment which is what most of them do anyways.

in my opinion there are many factors that influence the bounty project taking time to enter the market. most probably because they do not have enough funds to be able to enter the exchange. or maybe because they waited until the market was good enough that the tokens that were issued could last a long time on the crypto market. or because the manager and developer failed to develop the project. so finally the project never entered into exchange. and become a scam project.

Long or short does not everything depend on dev? even dev can do cooperation or agreements when selling and that is where it can provide confidence to investors. regarding exchanges may be hindered by funds that must be large and also some conditions that cannot be agreed by the team. so they are difficult to be able to enter strategic markets. they should try to be able to enter strategic markets

indeed it is quite difficult to be listed on popular markets, many cases that make new projects difficult to enter into it. The developer must be responsible for that because they can have access to its depth because projects that can enter the popular market list in my opinion a potential project

most of project gets more than million dollars. it is more than enough to enter exchange.

it looks like weird. how if the market is never good enough, wont they enter the market?
or, if market needs too long time to be good, do we make sure that the project still alive?

this is more rational, the project is sh** so they wont enter good exchange

If you notice most of the bounty project now is postponed for the reason is we are now at a long bear situation. We cant blame the project for this. Plenty of project can reach the hardcap because of the bear market. Way back in 2017 most of the project is successfull and easy to list in most trusted exchange why because they have a budget to list.

Most projects are not raising the required fund to develop their products, let alone raising funds to list on exchange. An example of it is a project that tried on his part, probably by meeting with investors privately to raise the softcap or feigning that softcap has been raised and hoping that other investors will come from the public to raise the hardcap. Yet nothing positive is happening. Such will find it hard to list on exchange.

many factor, and the first is fund raising from ico, that why they must collect money first and minimal reach softcap for run the project.
and after that calculate how many they must fee for listing in exchange, that why now IEO is trend because they already have exchange where there project will listed, that will make investor a little calm because their coin will release in market, but still no guarantee the price will pump/dump.

Also the projects that listed in big exchange with IEO are the project that already qualified and have a great potential for the future.
As i know, the project team doesn't pay for the exchange if they want held IEO but they just ask for the exchange to list them and the exchange selecting which project that qualified for their exchange's IEO. Then if the project reach a big success, the exchange itself will exclusively selling the good potential tokens and ofcourse it bring many people to using their exchange

Every project has its own challenges, especially when entering a quality market. It takes a lot of time and effort. so most projects fall apart.

Unfortunately, it is not enough to organize a Bounty campaign to make a successful project and get listed on exchanges. Bounty hunters just help to promote project, but the team members should make their best to present the features of the proeject to the potential investors by holding AMA sessions etc.

Many factors that affect the project require a long time to enter the market, one of which is the funds they get if they make an ICO
For IEO, tokens/coins will list when IEO ends and the funds they get reach softcap, but if they want to list in another exchangers without having to pay, they have to make their project good to be interested by many people

If only for slisting in the market carelessly, or in other words, a market that has a low transaction volume actually could have easily done it. However, the owner of the project does not want their coins to be just a display in the market without any large transactions taking place every day. The problem is to be able to list on a rather good market that cannot be done haphazardly. There are requirements that must be fulfilled by the owner of the coin. The exchanger doesn't want to slash new coins in vain.

My positive view here is that they may not have the budget to list on bigger exchanges so they are still looking for a way to raise funds for it. And this is a good strategy because if they were just listed on a shit exchange there is a high chance that their coin is out of volume and they will be bankrupt in this decision.

My negative point here is that scammers are slowly running out of our money, so they delay the exchange until investors and bounty hunters don't have the interest to ask because they know it will go to scam.

What I see, why most of the projects have difficulty in listing in a good exchange is because the listing fee of well known exchange is very high. But if the team behind the project were able to reach their softcap and hardcap there are still few of them that list their tokens in a cheaper exchange so they still have a good amount of money that they will divide among themselves.

There are very few projects right now that has a genuine goal which is to launch their platform in order to help the people around the globe with their bright ideas and this kind of projects will surely list their tokens to the top notch exchange even if there is very few money that were left to them.

I need answers just as you do, i have few tokens in my wallet that still failed to enter crypto exchange till date, the teams claim that they are working on the product and its near to perfection but this is over a year already.

The major reason is Finance. For me, once a project is adequately funded, they don't need to FUD. Aside from token dumping upon listing, I have seen couple of projects do Buy-back. The buy back program is to help the token regain its value back after a dump.

many new projects are not trusted by most people because on average they will experience dump after listing so many new projects choose to develop their products first, causing them to take longer to enter the market

Most times, negotiating with exchanges in order to find an ideal one to list on takes some time. Also, listing fees could be a major reason for delay,  with projects looking for the exchange with more affordable listing fees and significant trading volume. Also,  some projects may just choose to focus on development while ignoring listing completely.

For listings on exchangers, it requires a fairly large listing fee especially on large exchangers like Binance. The team needs time for listing due to several factors and one of them is the cost for listing. Sometimes they choose a listing on a small exchanger first while creating a great product so that the large exchanger is interested in listing

Bounty project take time enter on market because the bounty or ICO coin manage by not trusted owner, if you participated with trusted owner I think faster after received your token can sell on exchange market, last time I participated on minter bounty campaign running just few weeks but after bounty ended just few days later I can sell my bounty coin rewards.

One of the important reasons, in my opinion, is not the desire to spend the collected funds on a paid listing, but the choice is made in favor of expecting market growth in order to multiply your already collected funds and make money on it. For example, admins raised USD 1,000,000 for the development of the project and spent about half, then the remaining funds can give several Xs when the market grows, which will increase their balance significantly and after that they can no longer work, but simply put money in their pocket.

Because not a lot of exchanges like uncontrolled bounties

They want guarantees, they want to know that the project has a vesting period for the bounty, a KYC and did not abuse on the amount distributed to the hunters

Yes, now almost all tokens that fall on the exchange for the first time fall in price by almost ten times. This is largely due to the current poor state of the cryptocurrency market. Therefore, many ICO teams try not to rush with the withdrawal of their token on the exchange. Everyone hopes that in the near future the cryptocurrency market will begin to rise. Of course, there are simply objective difficulties that prevent the rapid appearance of tokens on the exchange. Also, many are right in the sense that many projects turn out to be fraudulent.

The market is bad. But there is another problem. ICO or IEO. Somehow collecting money. The market may not be very good. Those who manage the project need to own their own coins. If the bitcoin does not suffer a big drop, the newly released altcoin can resist.

For most projects,  the bounty is to promote their IEO or ICO. In such cases,  it takes time to put in place listings,  effective buy back strategies(if any). No project wants the price of their token/coin to dump, so even after listing on an exchange they delay distribution in order for the project to build a solid trading market/price.

Unfortunately, projects conducting bounties do not always raise enough funds, and if they succeed, then investors often want to profit from bonuses, which means there is a risk that they will sell part of the coins immediately after listing. The likelihood of this increases because bounty hunters, fearing a dump after listing, also want to sell their coins received for promoting the project.
Add to this the bearish trend in the market and get a combustible mixture that can easily turn the price of a coin into trash.
In view of this, it is not surprising that projects are trying how they can delay the moment of listing and further dump.

This often happens where the tokens we get from running the bounty have not been listed in the exchange and sometimes we ask why this can happen. Maybe there is something that makes developers doubt as we know that many new coins are listed in the exchange and investors may not want to if the price goes down or their coins end up just becoming junk and they have to pay also on the exchange site.

It's not always about funds, I have promoted two projects since mid 2018 and one met softcap and the other raised hardcap successfully and till date they are not listed on exchange yet, airwallet and chellecoin, they are both good projects but production is very slow

Projects team are actually complaining about present market condition, it seems they are targeting a good time to list on exchange without having to much bad impact on token price

With so many coins in the market exchanges especially the good ones can afford to be very selective about the coins that they list, exchanges have costs as well and they are not going to include a coin in their exchange unless they know they can get profits with it, however the developers of the coin can pay to an exchange a fee to get listed, but that fee can be quite high and if the project is small then that will not really be an option, also it is possible that the developers are afraid that the coin is going to be dumped if it gets listed too soon.

sometimes, there are shitprojects which dont wanna pay to enter exchange
I know those types are so much here. bcz they just aim to stole investors money
so, I conclude that it fully depends on dev itself. if the dev is bad, no matter big source it is, it wouldnt make the coin/ token enter good exchange

Bounty projects were inadequate in many respects. Bounty issuing coins could not enter Exchange. In this case, the prices crashed. Due to low prices, interest in Bounty projects decreased. ICO projects did not organize bounty. We need a new order.

One of the top bounty manager yahoo managed a bounty which was finished in Q2 2018 still has no sign of listing. They are telling one thing, can't let this token price dump. Exchange listing money isn't few amount, this could be another reason. Some coin has good plan like without beta or main version doesn't enter in exchange.

this can be said that developers do not think about the fate of the investors and bounty campaigns that have participated to make many people participate in fundraising created by developers, and usually that is also the influence of their project concepts that are not fully ready to be launched.

True. Exchange listing fees can be exorbitant a times. As it ranges from 0.6 btc to 2btc for medium range exchanges like Hotbit, Bilaxy. But then it all lies on the developers. This is why Investors prefer IEOs because they are allowed the opportunity to actually see the possible future listing of the project unlike in ICOs

It does not concerned yahoo with the bounty project. He is well paid for that campaign and the listing isn't on his hands already. i know that he is a famous manager and some will agree too. Can I ask which campaign he handles youre talking about? Most of campaign in forum have different category and the one he handle mostly is signature paid. So I'm curious what this project?

This kind of problem should know the solution the day before they start the ICO. Delaying it will not help actually there are more people will be affraid to that token if they dont list it after ICO.
They should have plan about bounty dumping and potential investors sellers before they start to list it in exchange, but delaying it without a plan will result of decreasing it price the day its listed.

Many bounty projects are new projects and new projects will always have a long way to get fully ready for listing if the project is not scam, the highest is a year or two that i have witness, i think its normal

if you want to enter the dex exchange it seems free, but to enter the famous exchange will certainly be difficult because many regulations for example have to incur additional costs to be listed there, if the project does not have funds I think it will be difficult to be listed on the best exchanges, usually the project stalling until next year to be exact 2020, no one has to wait until 2 years, 2020 is probably the best year for crypto, so just wait for them to release everything well, no need to rush to get the exchange at least the best time will determine a good price value

The mere fact that many bounty project existing it takes long to be listed in the quality exchange because of the funds that they must pay is a huge amount of money.  I also notice it the other takes year but that is not worthy anymore to invest and lack of investors to the project. This should be assess first before we put some effort in this kind of project.

I dont think bounty project afraid to list on market because of dump. In this market downtrend and maybe near future, any project will hardly listed on big exchange. Many requirement need to be filled before listing, fee for listing and laws... All of this make listing a coin become harder and most of bounty project and some normal project  do not meet those requirements.

to avoid the bounty dumpers, that is what most of the projects are afraid of. they are afraid to list their coins to the exchanges too quickly because after it's listed then it just the matter of few hours the coins will get huge dump, to minimize this they usually using different ways such as locking the bounties or distributing the bounty rewards into different batch to avoid this happen.

There are so many reasons behind it. First, they focus on developing and implementing things for the improvement of the project. And other reason is maybe they find it hard to enter a good exchange.
For me, they just use this as an excuse, since bounty hunters are holding only a few numbers of the coin, there is no chance that they can dump its price in the market. Unless the team and other investors will also sell together with the bounty hunters.

The answer is very simple, do not have enough funds or do not have yet any products. But there are also some projects that have enough funds and already have prototypes, but they don't want to pay to the exchange to be listed there. So, if you want your token to be quickly listed on the exchange, just look for a platform that already has a product or at least a prototype, and is loyal to money (not stingy).

Now the most investors only invest in old projects especially in Bitcoin, Ethereum and only a few invest in new coins that's why the new project doesn't get the hard cap and they never pay from there pocket to enter in high-rank exchange as the high-rank exchanges demand high fees.

If a project is able to achieve convincing sales results, I think the developer team does not need to be afraid to list on a good exchanger. Fear of dumping in my opinion is unwarranted because a good project will always be the target of investors and if it has a large transaction volume, dumping will not occur if the proportion of token holders is balanced.

If a project take properly good developing target with very professional partnerships panel then they will no need more time for successful token sales and listing exchange.
This time is very helpful for listing exchange because OF the IEOs service, you need choice IEO in popular exchange that's good service short time for successful a project.

Nowadays a lot of the projects are going for IEOs and ICOs, even before the initial phase of development is over. So by the time when the ICO/IEO is completed, the tokens may not be ready to get listed. Another factor that comes in to play is that now the team needs to spend money on the exchange listing, at a time when they should be concentrating on the product development.

there are a number of requirements for IEO in large exchanges that most projects cannot do, including competition between registered projects that must be faster with their readiness for development. Usually IEO coins are ripe and the roadmap runs quickly in the first quarter.

as we know that there are many projects out there that are proportionately very weak, they only depend on the development of funds obtained from the initial sale, they need time for market listing because they are not ready with the initial funding.

Yes, that is normal, because when a bounty project proposes to collaborate with an exchange, it will certainly be researched first by the exchange, that is what often takes a long time, because the exchange also does not want to simply put a useless token into their list.

Because the list of major exchangers is expensive, and that is the reason why some projects only list at exchangers that have a small volume. Their funds are only sufficient for operational costs, product development, etc. but if they focus on developing one day there will be exchangers who list their projects without having to pay

You already answered your own question, OP.
Most coins just ended up getting dumped and losing its value. You're just gonna question why do those tokens need to still stay in exchange. I remembered the days I was holding tokens like AION, it went boom for a while but after the ICO, the price just went "meh".
Probably just keep on investing Bitcoin, OP. It's worth hodling.

That will happen when the dev can list its token into the good exchange site and what will be happening when the dev can only list its token into crap exchange site? i guess there will be a massive dump  that can'e be avoided. with million dollars of money and that doesn't make sense for the token to be listed to the crap exchange site and take very long time.

This is more or less speculation, and also they consider the success or failure of their products in the market by monitoring the data available, and I think it takes a lot of time and money. Only then can they decide whether or not their products are on the market

its not easy to be added in some exchange
some of them have a lot of requirement and some of them required a large fee

Today the process of listing in exchanges has become more difficult for new projects, so they won't be able to easily achieve the same goals as 2017 and 2018. Their projects have to be real. good and product, or they have to pay huge sums to get listed. And for new projects it's not possible because they have a very low budget

Which in my opinion is as it should be, all the big companies that you see today not only in this market but in all markets began as a small enterprise, but then as they become more successful then they begin to command the respect of the market until it gets to the point that they become one of the leaders of the market, it seems to me that the developers of those coins are expecting that success is going to come to them almost immediately and things to not really work in that way.

Maybe the reason behind why it takes so much time for a project to list their token is that at the first phase of their launch is they are already aiming high to get listed into the biggest exchanges which is really costly because listing is that much expensive specially if you really want to get listed into a reputable and well-known exchange. Also, there maybe a lack of financial stability when it comes to the entrance or entering of financial investments from the potential investors and pressure from the bounty hunters that is why it takes such a long time for the token to get listed because of the promise of paying out the bounty hunters after the span of time stated for the run of promotion. There might be other factors that are possible for us not to see which added up to the reason why it takes so much time for them to get listed in a short period of time expected to happen stated on their project plan.

Irrespective of the number of bounty participants, there shouldnt be issues getting listed on exchanges because not even up to 5% of the total tokens supply is being allocated to bounty in most cases, so there shouldnt be any significant change in price even if all hunters decide to dump at the same time, it all depends on how serious and dedicated the project is!

If a project lists on an exchange without good plan from the team, it will fall short of expectations. Such will get to a point and faint, because there is nothing more to contribute to the space. Also, a lot of them do not have good support from the community, which cause more panic to the team.

I think many coins are waiting for a more stable market
and for this reason they are in no hurry to put a token on an exchange.
in order to achieve the best possible result

And what do you think the team should have? If the plan for speculating with a coin, then this is not an honest game.
All the team needs is good coin liquidity and movement on the road map. This will be enough for the coin to circulate more or less stably.

Most bounty projects are taking their time to study the market, most times the time they enter the market can actually affect the projects, so they need to plan along the changes of the market.

Dont forget that many exchanges ask for a hefty fees as well as a big stash for the announcement and marketing stunt like airdrop to all of the members. It will be a really hard thing to do for new coins which barely got some investments to even create the project. Another important thing is that bounty hunters dump everything most of the time which is another reason why teams are not preferring to go into market.

I'm not sure its about fund issue because few projects I promoted successfully raised fund but they kept postponing listing on exchanges, I guess it's all about development, some get the job done half way before launching and after launching and raising funds they get on with the development

Actually real projects do not take a lot of time because the projects have already roadmap and the real projects already prepare for it but the scam projects r the projects with non professional team get always late and break the trust of investors and contributors.

New comers if mistakenly invested in scam project he r she will lose hope in crypto,so all be careful from the scams and if found scam project tell to others that scam projects can be minimized.

actually depends but their reason is to develop the project first, but the bad thing about this is that developing projects is only used as an excuse by projects that lack funds and after a long time they cannot register on exchange then end up with scams, but if it also forces a listing I think this is also bad because if the funds are used in a exchange that isn't of high quality it might be the same as killing a project.

many things that make the project, long time to enter the exchange such as, lack of funds, because the request to enter the exchange is delayed by the exchange team because there are many project requests to enter the market, or because the project is still continuing to promote the project

Because many of them not have funds to get on exchanges and some of them depends a lot on devs and also if exchanges want to list them, is hard to get listed new coins on big and old exchanges but maybe in future this will change.

The basic reasons behind why most of the new crypto coins find it difficult to enter the crypto market is that, most of these crypto coins have projects that are not really relevant to either the financial ecosystem and the crypto ecosystem to be specific ..  once the project has no relevance, its crypto coin will not have impact on the crypto market...

I think the reason behind why bounty projects take time to be able to get their coin to get listed into an exchange is because they are still lack of funds to afford the fee for listing into the top exchanges because large and reputable exchanges surely do have an expensive fee for a certain coin to be able to get listed. Being able to afford paying expensive fee means that the project is capable to provide the needed fee which means that their coin and project sa competitive enough and have gained the interest of the potential investors as well as bounty hunters to promote their project. Good quality projects are mostly those that are being able and capable of doing such listing on time. If a certain coin of a project take time to get listed, maybe there are other contributing factors that are needed to be considered including budget management that is being budgeted after the entire campaign if they have reached the desired amount to be able to get listed on time.

I find that hard to believe. Most projects have a timeline they follow, thus they know the exact time to enter the market so it's not necessarily about being afraid of dump, taking into account the can still look bounty rewards. On the other hand, most aren't legit; in this case they come up various lies of working on their projects with no proof to show for. In my own opinion, a good project worry less about bounty because they know of the neccessary steps to take rather they focus on building their platform while listing thereafter. 

Token list on the exchanges process is so lengthy specially in ico, list to exchanges it’s very difficult. Ico will go until token sell end or soft cap reached. List almost depend on teams because if they aren’t wanted, no possibility to add in the exchanges. Big exchanges review overall project before list, this another big challenges for new projects.                

loads of factors contributing to the delay in enlistment of tokens in the market. After token sales and monies get realised is less than what was initially proposed. The softcap of the project is not even insight and not to consider the hardcap as it is not realisable.  Now the team is considering how to manage the funds raised and also how to achieve the blueprint of the project or the roadmap. Now, pressure from both bounty hnters and investors come in  and the team decides to go to the exchangers and big exchangers are cahrging a 'rip off' amount that will offcourse shake or rather reduce the said funds that is still considered insufficient. when the pressure is too much and the long awaited time. That is what i believe you conside ra delay.

in my opinion the main reason many projects do not enter the exchange is the sale of tokens that do not reach the target, ultimately the funds allocated are insufficient to register to the stock exchange, or it could be that developers who really planned from the beginning to reap profits from the project and run off somewhere.
then it's better to be thorough at the beginning than sorry later

The majority of ICO/IEO projects fail to get the hard cap and they never go to high-rank exchanges due to their high fees and at last enter to low-rank exchange and dump within hours.

The project that take time t be listed are mostly not financially buoyant and they waste time because they are running around cheap platform to list. Again, many are low quality project and because of that they fear to list in low profile exchange and delay to source for fund for high profile exchange.

That happened because the project experienced a lack of funds to cooperate with the highest exchange, so the project was forced to choose a low exchange to make their token listing, even though it would lower their token's reputation.

They need more money in order to scam and runaway after listing to good exchange, developers behind are not after with good outcome and progress but only after with money that they will be collected from those investors who participated hoping to earned from their early investment.
Bounty nowadays are really prone from scamming team who wants to collect and run after.

That's right, I strongly agree with your opinion, many projects are not qualified and they do not have enough funds to reach a high exchange, this is what makes the project late in making a listing in any exchange.

Because most of bounty project are doing ieo & ico which they need to raised fund to entered big market , and bounty reward will distribute always after 1-2 month after the bounty end to avoid no brain bounty hunter that will killed the price once the token listing on exchange, that what i know about why bounty project take time to listing on exchange or market.

Not at all but yes for the majority of icos. It caused by the investors are getting centralized to the top exchange site as they are wanna avoiding the scam project. The exchange sites give more guarantee for them to invest in the IEO platform. The bounty project is following this too.

I think the new tokens that are created and promoted through the bounty program will take a long time to register in the market because they expect that when they start to be in the market they will be ready to become coins that are sought and used. so they need quite a long time and chase to find cooperation that will accompany until the tokens are sold out. they also need the right time and moment when they are listing on the market so the price can rise.

The main problem is capitalization and financing. Many projects enter the market just to meet the expectations of investors. Others, on the contrary, are waiting for the right moment, which may lead to the fact that the project simply cannot enter the market and compete normally, because investors can sell their investments immediately after entering the market. A long wait is always tiring.

well this is true for me, yeah i admit that developer can avoid dump happend if they have big capital before distributing big amount for bonty & airdrop like how korea project named origin that airdropping almost million worth of their token, their price are stable at 0.3.

I've promoted bitwings since 2018 ending and till date they keep postponing their ICO over and over, some projects are not true with their plans and they take advantage of the fundraising too, there is nothing to do about this than to wait and see what happens in the end

It's always one delay after the other, if I have to start giving reasons why most projects have this issues I will have to keep writing for hours, there are many reasons that cause the delays, funds, weak team, bad aims etc

Lets just say there are due processes to everything on the crypto currency space.
The processes are slow or faster depending on the personality that handles the projects.

After crowdfunding processes, tokens list immediately, some after few weeks, some after few months, anytime it gets listed, the stability of the price depends on the project community, the token hodlers, the projects product and its viability.

Always dyor, before you join bounty programs, some tokens are due to unlock after a year, some months etc

If you want to keep promoting new projects you have to get used to delays, I've promoted some since 2019 and only one project sent out the tokens and I was able to sell for good price, I still have like 5 projects that haven't pay hunters till today

It's been long since I received tokens in my ETH wallet last, it seems most ERC20 are bad projects, some developers aren't that serious and they intentionally delay the launch, to say the truth delaying won't make a project successful, look at temtum, the project was released while market was in red and it still became successful

What you have pointed out is true. But I would say that the biggest problem is the bounty hunters themselves. There are too many bounty hunters nowadays and too few bounty campaigns available. As a result, we have some users willing to do bounties which have extremely unfair terms and conditions. This gives opportunity for the bounty campaign managers and the ICO promoters, to cheat the participants. The bounty hunter needs to change first. Avoid doing such bounties and in the end the ICO promoters will fall in line.

The reason is that now there are a lot of cryptocurrencies. And in order to enter the market, the project should be really unique.
The amount of advertising is also important.

I think if many bounty campaigns have been completed but still haven't paid the bounty hunters, then you don't need to promote their projects anymore because sometimes they scam and will harm you.

as much as possible you try to contact the bounty manager and if indeed they don't make payments then you can try to make a scam report on the reputation thread.

Bounties projects run for a month or a week it depends on the project it self. It takes some times to enter the market as a new coin/token. Also i remember there is a term and condition if you want to apply on a market. So it make sense bounties project take a long time to enter crypto space.

Some exchanges have higher requirements in order for them to list a project, some have higher listing fees... A project that still at it's beginning still don't have enough funds to accumulate other exchanges.. Thats why other projects can't go on exchange

Advertising is not so important to get listing man. If the project is legit and have value in near future it will be added in exchanger. Maybe 1st time they will add in low quality exchanger but after few months they will be added in good exchanger. Otherwise they should pay for listing their money and many exchanger have many rules and fees, team should be fill all the rules and fees.

For starters there are many reasons to consider while listing a token
1- the Market Condition
2- The type of exchange
3- project Road map e.t.c
Many project tends to follow their road map and hence takes a whole before listing and also if the market isn't that good at the moment, many projects differ their listing so as to enable the market to stabilize before listing while some will also consider the type of exchange as a good exchange I believe wouldn't be that cheap to list in

Except from that, some project owners take longer time to list sometimes because they know that listing at that moment wouldn't be helpful to the project.

fear of dumps is one of them besides that they also want to develop products first and when entering a large exchange the price will be stable because the product has started to be used by many people

The charge to pay an exchange market most especially those that are reputable ones are somehow expensive that  the developer itself can't afford or simply does not want to pay. The money from the bounty campaign may not be enough for the project to be listed in such exchange. Another factor is that the project itselfis not worthy to listed in an exchange. Many projects are just a waste of time and dead token listed in an exchange is just a trash. It should not be there in the first place.  

It's either the project team never have any good plan from the beginning or the project have to be delayed for a reason that only the team understands, we all hate delays but not all delays will have a bad ending

in my opinion they do such a plan because they want to make the price condition of the token or project not collapse because usually what I know when bounty or airdrop participants get paid then they will immediately exchange it for fiat currency so that it will make the price condition collapse .

Nowadays a lot of the projects are going for IEO and ICO, even before the initial phase of development is over.The tokens may not be ready to get listed to collaborate with an exchange thatt often takes a long time, because the exchange also does not want to simply put a worth less and new token into their list. Another reason , there maybe a lack of financial stability of the project manager .

in my opinion you need to look at every roadmap of a project that is launched, and in my opinion everything is running normally, there is no late  to getting listed on exchange, because everything they do takes time to process anything, because many bounty projects have been completed but ICO / IEO is still running, so we assume that they are taking too long to listed on the exchange, and in my experience, after the ICO is finished they will be listed on the exchange within a maximum period of 1-2 months, and this process runs normally.

I see most of the projects fail to raise enough funds for their development. Due to a lack of funds, they probably cancel the project or deviate from their roadmap. Or even due to budget issues, they are not able to list their token or coin on desired exchanges. Also, since such projects are not backed up with enough money for marketing, they prefer marketing via bounty which is very cheap for them.

I don't think there is any project that is afraid to enter the market because of bounty hunters, remember all powers lies within the team, they can locked bounty reward, delay reward or even reduce allocation. However, I think they have their reasons which might be that they are still developing or have a stipulated time frame which is stated in their roadmap. Another reason might be that, they have exited scam.
Lastly, the ability to control dumping of token price is what differentiates most team; there are projects which dish out large amount of tokens as bonuses to investors which have the potential to crash the price and yet they do nothing about it, while there are others that locks up the bonuses and gradually release them.
Thus, you can see that, there are several reasons which makes most projects to delay listing.

Not because they are afraid to dump their token, but because their token has no utility at all. A project that has development and usage never afraid to be dumped because they know the future. Bounty campaigns are just wasting the time of every hunters and investors, most of them did not succeed nowadays.

As we all know that exchanges will help to boost the popularity and added some investors of the project, why they don`t want it to list? They have many excuses but the bottom of this is they are scammers. And they don`t want to paid btc on large exchanges because they target is to collect money only for investors.

There were several projects that lack fund at the initial stage and yet, they were able to raise enough to cater for their listing. A project that has good stuff to deliver will get the attraction. The problem most of the developers have is their USECASES. There are certain usecases that do not have any blockchain application. They are not supposed to be brought here and yet they come here to get fund and at the end, listing becomes a problem.

Not necessary the reason but they have not solid funding. they believed in the community here to assist in fund raising and awareness. it requires funds and a huge volume to get to some of these exchanges. not just a pee Nut. you need enough to get to those exchanges and they don't care how much you have or the worth of your product. they need the money to get you listed. remember, if your token has not volume and no trade, they delist you.

The funds is not everything, the exchange sites have already announced they will be listed a project that meets all of their qualification. in fact, some old projects have already published if they will also do verification, audit to the team, product and the future vision and many more.

not all exchanges only concern on money only , today many reputable exchanges want better qualification on project that will listing in their exchanges.we know exchanges often help AMA to check on project quality. for example in binance exchanges,we will regularly see this AMA when they will launched community voting.

binance will be example for this.they prefer choose good project that money oriented.

I totally agree with you! Fund is one of the key factors for a project to be listed on Exchanges. Although some people think it's not a big deal, though, you have to remember that this is a business field. In business field, everything has to exchange for money, no one do business just because they want others to be successful but not themselves! And it's right, it takes a while for project team to raise the fund!

Lot of those projects that make bounties are scammers and only few are legit so don’t be surprised that 90-98% of those will hardly get into market and some will gone just that.

it's because it's not easy to list on large exchanges other than that the costs are also very expensive, or maybe they have difficulty when developing so the team is afraid of dumping in the market

Most bounties and projects know they are going to run away with btc before seeking for promotion in bitcointalk. Paying higher btc as listing fee cant be done by some project rather running away with the btc gotten from ICO is another only option and victims falls into this all time. Never participate in bounties conducting ICO or IEO on lower exchange, it gives no reward at all.

Most of all this project don't have what it takes to get listed on exchange, the main reason most can't also afford to list on top exchange, not until they can meet up with exchange requirements, they won't still be listed on any exchange.

Exactly like that, most bounty-generating projects are scams. From 2017 until now, I don't see too many successful projects with bounty. Most of them are dead and become scam

for each exchange, they don't accept new coins carelessly, so they need a lot of capital spent to join the exchange, so, for this reason, many ICO projects lose competitiveness after launch.

Some projects team will surely work slowly, it's why I think it's better for projects to get to their near complete stage before getting announced or throwing a bounty Campaign to the public, most projects are half way done job and after bounty ends promoters will have to wait for a year or more before getting rewards

Yes, registering on a large exchange is certainly very different from registering on a small or medium exchange, because there are other things that the project team must prepare to be able to meet the registration requirements.

A lot of possible reasons could cause project halt and need more time to work on before they getting listed on the exchange. Blockchain technical's aspect is one of them since not every coin can be implemented on exchange.

I think they do not have the capital to maintain the value of tokens on the exchange, so they are not listed in exchange. If the token is already on the exchange, but the investor is not present to buy, while dev does not have the capital to maintain the price of the token, then the token will dump. If the token price has been dumped, of course negative issues will attack it, new investors will find it difficult to enteres.

Have you ever think that project needs to do more than try to be list on exchanges? I saw too many jumpy projects that only care about how to get on exchanges as soon as possible to meet the hard true: their coin got dump hard because of no real progress for the project to hype up buyers.

I think this does not only apply to bounty projects but all crypto currency projects, except a poorly planned project, nobody rushes to the exchange for listing. If you consider projects such as the hybrix project which listed after 2 years of the platform development, it did well. Same can be said about cartesi, in summary, patience wins

In most cases, we see delays because the team wants to prolong the time needed for further development, they do not want to just list a coin without any progress in roadmap because it would mean, that they fail to deliver product and this will cause a drop in value immediately after listing.

And not all projects can experience the same thing, and every team has its own way of developing projects to achieve success, because not all projects that are registered in the long run can succeed, all of this still depends on the interested platform built and the token enthusiast when it's already is in the market.

Basically, when they have a strong vision and they would always put exchange site as an important thing too, you should remember when the product didn't get any demand and it will be another failed product. We must aware they can do the promotion through the exchange listing too. Further development is a non-sense reason to give another delay.

If the team afraid the hunters will dump the token, then they should pay hunters with other coins like BTC or ETH so their token value will not be dumped.
When they paying bounty with other than their own token, it means they want to protect their token value and more participants will be attracted to join because the reward.

Most developers focus on project development than having the coin/token in the market. Having a working product is better than having a coin listed without a final product.  People look forward to projects to list their coin to make the price higher and dump, which I think will not be healthy for the project as a whole. Focusing on development will help the project survive longer. The team will waste money if they list their coin just for it to be open in the market without even a working product.

As long as the team has already raised a lot of money and they can do that but what happens when the opposite things happened with them all? i think that depends on the what situation that has already faced by the team.

Lot of them does not know how to make sure that their promises are on track. There could be some times in which the project takes too long for it to reach the market but some time there could be some sort of delaying in giving to bounty hunters.