Bitcoin Forum

As usual, the protectionist trust mob are rallying together as they get cornered by their own bad behavior and attempt to use the trust system as a cudgel to punish people for calling it out. Amazing coincidence this negative rating was left for me today as I called out the behavior quoted below.

marlboroza   2019-12-31      troll


How much longer is everyone going to tolerate the use of the system designed to prevent fraud as a tool to silence criticism?

Trust is abused by more then the people you consider in the "mob" and complaining isn't going to change it. Give theymos a viable solution and maybe something will be changed.

I'm just voicing my opinion and not taking either side, but how many things have changed by simply complaining?

For example https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213717.0

Problem with this solution is it only gives DT1 more power, and everyone is is just stuck with their decision. With 100 people on DT1 each month, that's alot of different opinions potentially. We do not all agree on the same things. Heck, even the staff disagree with each other on certain things.

You mean like you weren't taking sides when you deleted positive trust you had left me in the past for voicing my opinion (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5152117.msg51402158#msg51402158)? Your hands aren't as clean as you pretend they are. Actually a lot has changed and continues to change, your ignorance of this fact is meaningless.

I bet you anything Theymos could probably come up with something better and more intricate than anything most people here could suggest or have suggested.  He's had some pretty creative solutions to forum issues before, but who knows what he thinks about stuff like this.

I hadn't looked at TECSHARE's trust page in a long time and just noticed Lauda's feedback:

I don't agree with that one either, because even though I don't like or agree with a lot of what he writes--and he hounded me all around the forum a few years ago and would up leaving me a nasty neutral feedback--I wouldn't hesitate to trust him in business matters, which to his credit he's shown himself to be very trustworthy in over the years. 

There's a big difference between an untrustworthy scammer and someone whose opinion or perspective on something you think is a lie.  There are any number of reasons why two people might see the truth totally differently, and it doesn't mean either one is necessarily a liar.  I also don't think any member, regardless of whether they're on DT or not, should be leaving negs like "Troll".  Marlboroza might not be on DT (or is he?) but he's a respected member here.  Not sure what he's thinking with this one.

I deleted the trust because you're just a dick to deal with on the forum. You and trading is a different story as I have never seen an issue with you on a trade here. As seen by your reply to my last post, you're just an asshole period and bring a lot on yourself.

There is no rationalizing with you about anything. You're right everyone else is wrong end of story right?

You're lucky people don't just tag you for being a fucking narcissistic prick. I have already agreed in the past, me removing my trust for you was probably not the smartest move because our trade should have nothing to do with how I feel about you personally, but at least I didn't replace it with a retaliatory feedback like you huh.

Reap the rewards for being a prick dude.

Thanks for admitting you use the trust system to satiate your emotional whims rather than as a system to prevent fraud. I am a prick, what of it? Does that justify your use of the trust system as a tool of retribution to soothe your butthurt?

What retaliatory feedback? Please quote.

Yep I removed your positive over a 20$ trade. You can now cry for all of 2020 over it. I righted a wrong with that 1 IMO, you deserve a neutral but i'm too stubborn to put it back, just like you're too stubborn to stop being a baby.

Just ignore me n move on now

You think this is about the rating? I don't need your positive trust. This is about you abusing the trust system because you can't control your emotions. If you don't like being called out don't throw stones from glass houses. Maybe you should take your own advice eh?

This thread is about marlboroza abusing the trust system, not yahoo62278.   Isn't it?

You still refuse to lead by example?  :/

Cue the hurt feelings...

• Grow some balls...
• Harden the fuck up...
• Put them on ignore...
• Have a wank
• Go for a walk outdoors and enjoy the first day of the new year.

marlboroza reputation assassin
you need to find your bosses
there are members working for hire like this

trust + merit = false power

https://gifimage.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/freedom-gif-braveheart-5.gif

I can't understand one thing: why do you not put them in ignore list, eh?

It's really weird, see: For example, i have some assholes in russian local which i don't like, moreover, i think they are dangerous to forum members. I left my feedbacks to them and send them to Ignoreland. Sometimes they create butthurt topics (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5212413.0) about me but most of the time i don't see them. So, what's bother you to do so?

Wouldn't it be nice if ignoring somebody prevented them automatically from commenting on your own threads? Ignoring on its own is not really that effective depending on what the goal is. If the goal is only to protect your brain from a user's bullshit, then it is effective. Otherwise it really isn't useful for anything.

I don't see any problem with it. You just don't watch what this person writes, so you're not care about where this person is writing in your topics or not. This is my view.

I think you're referring to popular concept of blocking users, as opposed to ignoring them which is an entirely different concept.
This means you would block them from posting in your thread, as opposed to merely ignoring them.
You know where the Meta board is for suggestions  ;)

I've just been Trolled by marlboroza (yet again and they have placed me on ignore (yippie!) - so this is my "right of reply" to their (marlboroza's) Trolling in my Known Alts thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg53626784#msg53626784 Archive [1], [2 (https://archive.ph/buw5v#selection-6659.4-6659.32)]

Get to work wanker.

So you really *are* reading my posts...

I suppose I should feel honoured...  ::)

I suspected there is something wrong with account hacker1001101001, I just didn't have time to look at it deeper, some evidence were posted in hacker's meta topic, you literally came to that thread to troll soo...

Together with your other trolling in other topics and deflecting threads (for example that one (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5210651.msg53378525#msg53378525) for what lauda tagged you), gaming trust system which is documented in Vod's feedback and linking nutildah's post (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5182530.msg52385837#msg52385837), then accusing moderators that they removed their own topic and even if they say they didn't (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5173424.msg52094646#msg52094646), you refused to update topic with correct info till this date which makes your thread defamatory, then including person who speech hate and physical harm (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5182672.0) to your trust network out of spit, then having scammers, hacked and banned accounts (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5118173.0) in your trust network, there are many examples, I just don't have time to link them all. This is very well documented trolling https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5214377.msg53514120#msg53514120

I will use this post as a reference and update feedback.

Shocking how all the toadies seem to mobilize all at once every time I am critical of one of their pals. None of this is on topic. Make your own thread to sling shit.


More trust abuse deleting and replacing ratings:

marlboroza   2020-01-25   Reference (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213992.msg53698288#msg53698288) troll, evade

Ok, so what triggered my apology to my past mistakes being meaningless to you ? Me posting my views about some mobbing going on around ? Really is the trustworthiness of a person is that transparent to you from just some opposite views towards a topic. I really thought you took my words of not repeating it again. Get deeper dude, you are catching some big fishes around.

Feedback was updated with reference link and more details hence new feedback. It is not trust abuse to do that.

Sorry, I fixed quotation.

You're off base here. Does what you are referencing show in any way that TECSHARE is likely to scam someone? No. If you insist on using the feedback system for this then at most a neutral tag should be applied. More to the point the post you use as a reference points to you not trusting their judgement, which comes down to excluding them from your trust list... which I will assume you have already done.

That is actually very good argument. Should I make that feedback neutral then?

I have default trust settings since 2019.

---

@TECSHARE I didn't repost anything, as you can see there is difference between old and new feedback.

That's what I believe would be best in this situation, as you clearly want to leave the feedback. I would say an exclusion is more than enough based on how you perceive their judgement, but if you stick solely with Default trust then I can understand not deviating from that.

Great. Now if only Lauda and Vod would follow suit, that would be great. I am not holding my breath though.

Nah, I don't do that exclusion/inclusion thingy.
Actually, I should have done what TECSHARE suggested:
:)
It is not really great, I think your trolling is very dangerous. Over and out.

What would you like me to do Techy?  Change my feedback so it isn't based on what you think is just my opinion?

I'll remind you of your trust abuse against me - unless you can show medical evidence I am mentally ill, or produce evidence of my future plans, you are a hypocrite and can fuck off.  

Hold your breath.

 8)

Well just declare some one a "troll" and "dangerous" and you can do whatever you like then eh?





As usual, more insane jibbering that makes little to no sense from you. Your rating is "based on what you think is just my opinion" What the fuck does that even mean? As I have explained many times before, the rating I left for you was because of your doxing OG Nasty and your claimed reports to government agencies in retribution for his criticisms of you.

As Theymos said (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5142064.msg51007199#msg51007199) about your behavior:



"I was disgusted by the reckless and vicious doxing in this case, where:
 - The evidence was very thin.
 - Even if all of the allegations were true, it'd likely result only in civil penalties, not criminal.
 - The whole thing was motivated merely by past arguments. OgNasty never caused Vod to even lose anything, as far as I know. An utterly ridiculous & disproportionate escalation.
 - It's based on the premise that purely statutory crimes are directly unethical, which I don't agree with at all, though I'm willing to mostly look past this as subjective.

It's good that Vod came to his senses on this after the fact, though doing it at all certainly blemishes his reputation in my mind, and I added to my notes the fact that those users merited such a post. Meriting it is saying basically that we need more posts like this on the forum, and we do not need more posts like this on the forum.

Red-trusting Vod over this is an appropriate usage of red-trust, since his actions here are highly trust-relevant."



Your negative rating for me however:

Vod   2019-09-09   Reference (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5182530.msg52385837#msg52385837)   This profile has fundamentally abused the trust system, trading positive trust with as many others as possible to get on Default Trust. See reference and the BPIP DT Change Log for examples. Do not trust this profile's trust of others by adding ~TECSHARE to your personal trust list.

You and the usual retribution mob invented a bunch of unsubstantiated speculation and then claim it is abuse of the trust system, some how "justifying" your use of the trust system. Even if it was true, "abuse of the trust system" alone is not a valid reason for leaving a negative rating, this is what exclusions are for.

Clearly this is just retribution because I dared to tag you for your dangerous and insane behavior regarding OG Nasty, as you also tagged others who left you negative ratings for this behavior, and habitually leave frivolous and unsubstantiated retaliatory ratings. This is just the last act in your YEARS long pattern of abusive and stalking behavior against me documented here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=915823.0). In the past you were forced to remove your abusive and unsubstantiated ratings under threat of exclusion. This is just an extension of your past abuse of the trust system against me.

Would you like me to remove the reference to your obvious mental illness and repost the negative rating without it? Would that make the rating valid in your mind?

You're still in the blame/misquoting phase I see.  :/   I won't push you to do anything that makes you call for an adult; all I ask is that you clean up your own shit before you complain about mine.  TTYL

8)

As usual, you spout a bunch of shit that is barely decipherable as English, then run away when confronted and asked to provide any kind of logical retort.

I included TECSHARE for a moment to my trust list and got this as result:

https://i.imgur.com/kz6zQLE.png

Seriously https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5207811.0 ?

https://i.imgur.com/hK1WJRa.png

http://loyce.club/trust/2020-01-25_Sat_05.12h/982288.html

Really? I suppose you removed that account.

Fuck, I shouldn't have changed that feedback, you tricked me, I almost ended up negative and my reputation destroyed because of you troll.

I posted several times that I will not dumb things down for idiots.  Get someone to help you.

Always an excuse for never explaining your behavior... Vod does what he wants, even when it endangers and harasses the community members, and no one ever holds him responsible.

According to this page (http://loyce.club/trust/2020-01-25_Sat_05.12h/787736.html) you have 23 users on DT1 trust you and just five users on DT1 that distrust you.

Your total *should* be DT1 (18) - you'll have to ask LoyceV why there is a discrepancy.

*edit* - Have just realised you don't have the required ten users to qualify for DT1.

---

(if you *do* add ten users, then I'll drop from DT1 (-12) to DT1 (-13)) - the choice is yours. Cause and effect.

There is no reason you should have included him to your trust list, because you don't trust his judgement. In that case also you would have only appeared negative to yourself, or seen your profile the same way anyone who have included TECHSHARE in their trust list. I'm sure you know this.

In general though if you were so inclined to include TECHSHARE hypothetically, you would then open a discussion with them about users on their trust list you disagree with. That's one of the base points of the new system to allow for discussion and resolutions. Then you decide if you want to keep them there or not.

Changing the feedback was the right thing to do, and this doesn't change that.

Techshare is sounding more and more Like cryptocunter. Abuse abuse, teams etc etc

Marlboroza requested to be blacklisted from DT1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5108783.msg49702473#msg49702473).

mobs... I guess, when reading tec's posts, users should go trough few links first. Lol, somehow I missed this part:

Complains about abuse, spreads false agenda across the boards, lies that someone has tried to silence him using trust and at the same time:

Uses moderator as a weapon to silence user because user said something TECSHARE didn't like (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5220741.0)
Dig dirt and use trust as a weapon because someone said something they didn't like  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5214377.msg53534115#msg53534115)

And at the same time:



I need to update my post with this info for reference purposes. This person is obviously crazy and should be tagged. I just don't see where I abused trust, but OK.

Tagging crazy people just makes them more crazy and even lends some legitimacy to their crazy "abuse" claims. Just let them be crazy.

Why would anyone interpret the behavior of yourself or marlboroza as mobbing or abusive? It is not like these strings of accusations made by all the same people are a repeating pattern any time anyone questions any of your behavior... oh wait.


marlboroza   2020-01-27   Reference (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213992.msg53716604#msg53716604)   Using trust and moderators to silence people.


Now I am using moderators, to silence people? They are just at my command now are they? It couldn't be that your posts were removed because they broke the rules now would it? Now I am using the trust system to silence people? What?

Beats me.

marlboroza   2019-12-31      troll

How much more clear does it need to be made that certain people are intent on using the trust system as a weapon to silence people who disagree with them?

Oh, it is 100% clear who is abusing trust, Techy.   :-*

FTFY. Are you trying to say that because of my factual feedback on your account you can't type? That doesn't make any sense at all.

You are just pissed because your attempt to silence someone who said something you don't like https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5220741.0 fail.

Certain users like marlboroza are intent on using "off topic" reports as a tool to silence any valid criticism against them. I am going to start reposting deleted posts in their appropriate thread so everyone can see exactly just how many off topic posts I have to defend myself from, and just how eager the mods are to delete my defenses, in my own threads, defending myself from these endless wild accusations.

Does FH get a chance to defend himself against your wild accusation?   (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5103785.0)  Nope -  self moderated.    You are asking him to prove his innocence (as you admit you don't have evidence to back the statement up) while complaining the rest of the community has double standards...

There sure are a lot of tools here to silence hypocrites.   :/

Yeah you are right, it is most likely you considering most of my removed posts are defending from your wild accusations (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=915823.msg53793284#msg53793284). Of course is is hard to know for sure because you all operate as a collective when you think you smell blood in the water. Twist though, it is your own.

So, we agree FH does not get to defend himself from your wild accusations. As long as you prevent him, please don't complain if you perceive others preventing you from the same thing.

Pathetic hypocrite.   ;)

TIL I have the power to silence moderators. You really, REALLY love projection don't you Vod?

Archived for record http://archive.is/rgyzs#selection-4343.0-4343.412

Please elaborate your post, how is reporting off topic reply to moderator "more trust abuse by marlboroza"? I am glad that someone has reported that off topic reply and moderator removed it, but it is far away from silencing anyone, trust abuse or whatever it is in this topic.

I didn't report it, you posting this in this thread is just another example of your trolling.

Sounds like effective reporting on marlborozas part.  Why not just try and make the posts in the appropriate thread right off the bat?  Then even if marlboroza reports them, you'll feel less abused/unhappy because they won't get removed.

Not just that but alt-accounts are jumping to aid his petty little mind games too, it is getting very silly now. The only sensible conclusion is thread was created for the purpose of doing nothing apart from gaining attention for his own self-gratification. I still do pity him somewhat but it is very thin now.

You fellows here to get ahead of something?


marlboroza   2020-02-28      "Interfering with investigations, posting lots of lies, trolls, deflects, http://archive.is/wip/7ygI5, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5226886.0, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5214377.0 user is highly deceptive. "


At what point does this community acknowledge I am under a coordinated attack by trust system abusers? If you think they will just quit when they are done with me, you are a moron. Time to stop being jellyfish and speak as one.

Now the fact that I want any say in how the trust system is run is being used as "evidence" to support a negative rating. Do they have to tattoo it on your face before you will admit what is going on?

I followed principles of your objective guild (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5226886.msg53895539#msg53895539) and acted accordingly!

It is not trust abuse according to you!

Stop harassing me now!

Did you present irrefutable evidence of the lies you claim TS has posted?

The references don't seem to make these Clear?

Are you claiming incorrect information was presented that you can prove is incorrect or all of this plus you can prove TS also knew it was incorrect and deliberately attempted to persuade others it was true?

This is not just a difference of opinion is it?

Are you lying about applying the guilds objective standards ? I find it hard to believe you have irrefutable evidence of scamming or strong compelling evidence of attempting to scam or setting up a scam.

You don't seriously expect anyone to believe TS engaged in direct financial wrongdoing?

I think there must be some misunderstanding on your part?  This looks like some flagrant and ruthless red tag abuse that lauda The scammer would pull. Not a more sensible member like you marlboroza.

I will hear you side of things. It may not be abuse but rather a language barrier?

marlboroza ask yourself - are these imbeciles really worth engaging with until they reform their character? I currently do not have either of them on IGNORE but just might have to do it if they keep going the way they are.

Asking for evidence for claims that form the basis of red tags is going the "wrong way" ?

Senior members lose nothing when newbies run from them. Debunk members statements and arguments that you are unhappy with, or simply accept you have been defeated. You should do so graciously, while being thankful for time they spent educating you.

I have this fake newbie account on ignore (I can only guess that they probably wrote text wall asking for evidence and probably some crap about objective standards), but I can't put this tard tecschare on ignore when he accuses me of doing something I didn't do over and over again! I am done with placing neutural on tecs's wall, however, I might link everything in thread I started, remove all neutrals and leave one negative.

Lunatic, tries to create some kind of club and lists some users which he doesn't like then he creates conspiracy theory that this imaginary group is conspiring against him.

Done with you? Quit what exactly? What the fuck are you talking about  ??? ??? ??? I strongly suggest you to visit DOCTOR, you maybe have brain tumor and I just saved your life.


"Some one doesn't like humorous critical observations being made about them so they abuse the reporting system to have them removed" - Tecshare (archived http://archive.is/07bbz#selection-9817.24-9843.9)

This topic is about "my trust abuse", and that post was  just under my post, TECSHARE certainly accused me of "abusing reporting system", not it is only off topic reply, tecshare is directly trying to hurt me by posting false information. It is defamation, a one big LIE.

https://i.imgur.com/2veu4oW.png

I did not report this post either, stop harassing me @tecshare!

---

reporting off topic lie btw, I don't want to tag you for defamation but I will strongly suggest you to restrain yourself of posting lies and off topic replies.

Yes, this thread is about your trust system abuse. Just because you don't like what I have to say doesn't make it a lie or a valid use of the trust system. Threatening even more tags in order to attempt to silence me? No trust system abuse here! Everyone move along, nothing to see here.

Going off-topic and writing walls of tripe is something synonymous with a few members that tend to post together in batches, mostly done just for misdirection and attention-seeking purposes. If they have been at it for years will they really change their ways now? Even the newbies sock-puppets and alt-accounts being used to post on-behalf of the few Turkish board members that cheated their way to DT1 have been attacking those that exposed their plans.

It is getting rather silly now to see the conduct of these imbeciles on a near day to say basis.

I followed what you presented in objective standardz guild, why are you complaining now? You don't want users to follow your standards now? WTH?  ???

What any of this has to do with your removed posts which you presented to look like I reported them in order to silence you? Why are you defaming me?

I did not report those posts you accused me of, and when I report post, it is because they are breaking forum rules. This https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213992.msg53938220#msg53938220 is off topic reply btw, and it is reported as one. It has nothing to do with you as person but it has everything with post which is off topic.

I am not threatening you, I was saying that I am reporting off topic post which is lie btw and I don't want to tag you for defamation, further, I am giving you suggestion to stop posting off topic replies and defamatory lies. I am sorry if it sounded like threat but it really wasn't.

Well, you are not the only one who noticed this  :-X
I don't know whether it is silly, but it is very sad.

This sounds an awful lot like what you and your red nosed friends are doing to silence any criticism of your trust system abuse. You seem to be a fan of projecting JollyGood. Marlboroza is even using the fact that I disagree with him in his "investigations" (read retaliatory peanut hunting expeditions) as justification for negative ratings. This thread itself documents several instances of negative rating abuse by Marlboroza, of which he was forced to remove under public pressure. This is just his latest attempt to reinstate those abusive ratings.

I wonder how you posted this.

Can you quote me post where I said I tagged you because I disagreed with you? Stop lying moron. I didn't bother to place all topics where you interfered and deflected other peoples investigations in feedback.
Who forced me exactly  ???

I decided it is best to not follow your double standardz guild and remove this feedback. It was suggested to me that best thing I can do is to stay away from lunatics like you.

You keep trying to silence me, but it isn't working. I disagree with you, and you just label it "interfering and deflecting" and call it a legitimate use of negative trust ratings. You were forced to do so by the same people advising you that these abusive ratings only make you look bad, like what happened just now. See you next time you can't restrain yourself and decide to abuse the trust system against me yet again.

Pictures or it didn't happen.

Public shame is a form of force.

So you think you are a tough guy, forcing everyone around? 

 ::)

TECSHARE: Sky is green.
suchmoon: Pictures?
TECSHARE: Green is a color.

You're funny.

It looks probable to me that the thread instigated the removal of malbozas trust abuse. I'm sure if the thread had provided overwhelming support for his abuse or there has been no thread it would remain.

It is also seems probable malboroza would claim It was his own decision and nothing to do with the thread.

I don't see The point of trying to make it look like a ridiculous claim. Historically there is a pattern of threads seemingly inducing malboroza to remove tag abuse.

He is more resonable than the scammer lauda so there is some small hope for him to join the guild.

Hmmm if you say so  ;D
 
What is the relationship between you and truth or dare?

First it was strictly business, then platonic, and its now advanced to romantic.

The real question is, will we be invited to the wedding?

I heard Thule is going to be best man and game-protect is going to be the bridesmaid.

Who forced me?

Who said I forced him? I don't have the ability to force him to do anything. However faced with the diminishing of his own reputation over leaving his repeated abusive trust ratings up, he was forced to choose between paying that cost an keeping it, or doing the reasonable thing and removing the baseless abusive rating. Speaking of wannabe tough guys "forcing everyone around" aren't you the one attempting to use baseless negative ratings to extort the removal of a valid rating on your trust page?


I have no idea. You tell me.

Techy admitting he made an accusation with no evidence means the "forced" comment was just trollbait.

Same with his comments about trust abuse.   We've spent way too much time entertaining the idiot.

marlboroza   2020-04-12   reference (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg54202466#msg54202466) "Shilling hard for exposed payed ICO bump account. Deflecting investigation about this fraudulent group on the level of shill account. "

The 3 ring circus continues. More guilt via association. A person defends me from abusive feedback, he is given abusive feedback in retaliation along with a thorough rectal exam hunting for peanuts, I defend him from abusive feedback, I am given more abusive feedback. Round and round we go in circles each abuse used to justify the last. It is time for the circus to leave town

~marlboroza

---

---

Yeah, do that. I don't care. I am not going to remove it, shill.

edited couple times

I see, so now you have unilaterally declared that no one is able to have a legitimate discussion about negative ratings, because anyone who dares to disagree with you will simply get a negative rating. You heard it from the horses ass himself folks, he is not interested in any discussion. Either agree with him or get a negative rating.

Do you agree this is trust system abuse? Go here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust) and add ~marlboroza to your trust list.

There is nothing legitimate in your..."discussion", shill.

As the one being questioned and abusing the trust system in retribution for disagreeing with you, that is a rather convenient unilateral claim to make isn't it?

I see no problem at all. What are the real motives for starting this thread against marlboroza?

Right, what could go wrong setting a precedent that it is ok to negative rate people for simply disagreeing with your use of the trust system and having a different opinion than you? No problem whatsoever. Clearly I have ulterior motives of making marlboroza abuse the trust system against me so I have an excuse to call him out on it in this thread. The amount of circular logic you clowns continually present as logical is amazing.

1. Criticize abuse of the system
2. Get the system abused against you
3. Post about abuse of the system

Making a post about abuse is abuse!

Complain to your objective standard guild members, shill.

You have my argument in that red text. I am not sure what other arguments you want but shilling hard for fraud group is more than enough for me. I don't know what we could actually discuss here.

A well thought out and rational argument marlboroza, as usual.

Why on earth was this thread created?

Was it really created just for some low-level titillation for the OP?

Seriously, all the hullaballoo within the thread consisting of hot air and nothing of substance just for the sake of some personal revenge against marlboroza who is one of the most active contributors to this forum?

Surely this sort of unethical conduct should not be allowed.

Most active and is net negative.

Marlboroza is a nothing burger.  Bring me his largest achievements here.  Where is he singlehandedly  forcing huge scams to offer 2 000 000 000 usd compensation offers to this forum? How many projects had he supported here over the years?  Where are the people all thanking him for making the millionaires? Like real contributors here??

Actually just any major achievement that made a real difference?  

Marlboroza is a scammer supporter. This is undeniable. Unless he wishes to prove me wong?

Jollygood is also another fake scam hunter who only wants to play detective with tiny little scams but is willing to let his friends enable and work with the same scams he tries to bust because he is a terrified little bitch. Even when people point it out to him he seems to try to run away and ignore it.

Both are a net negative and pushing clear double standards.

Marlboroza is a trust abuser. Selectively punishing members for lesser crimes than his friends commit who he protects and supports is clearly abuse.

He is too afraid to debate this with me. Why? Because he knows i will clearly demonstrate publicly that this is true.

I can not find evidence marlboroza is a scammer directly himself. Using double standards to shield scammers or punish the critics of scammers must be stopped.  I suggest malboroza redeems himself quickly else will find himself a pariah once we get all the corrupt and scammy members out of DT.

scammer supporters using trust abuse are as bad as scammers I beleive.

I will challenge marlboroza to debunk anything i have said here in our own dedicated thread.

I just see yet another member been here through 2 huge bull runs and is still milking this forum in sig spamming with even a paid avatar
Greedy non achieving scum.

Hope that cleared that up for ya.

Double standards trust abusing sig spamming scammer supporting nothing burger.
Change your ways marlboroza or you must be classed as bad as proven scammers here.

Jollygood the same goes for you. Although you have achieved even less that marlboroza as unbelievable as that may seem.
Respect your elders and clearly betters. I am noticing deliberate avoidance of tackling scam enablers and facilitators. Now supporting double standards and trust abuse.

By giving a 8yr old rather famous account with impeccable trade history a red tag you are devaluing the warning system and again placing honest members in danger.

Red tags are becoming dangerous in many ways to this forum. The worst is the crushing of free and open speech.

It was created because I tagged tecshare and placed "troll" on his trust page.

OP is paranoid cunt who see conspiracy theory everywhere and majority of information he post is not true.

---

@TECSHARE

Please update topic with new tag, it doesn't say "troll" any more, now you have:


And please update it with my argument:


Thank you, shill!

Marlboroza has now decided that when challenged to publicly debate points that i am making about him (which are true)
That rather than meet me in public to debunk my points ( which he can not)

He will claim that telling the truth about his non achievements and clear undeniable double standards is worthy of red.

The challenge to debunk my points is still there malboroza chicken shit scammer supporter and trust abuser.

These people run crying to red trust when they dare not answer or debate your undeniable points that you make about them.

Debunk the points that i have made in the post you referenced as justification for red malboroza

Or just keep hiding away.

Time for another meta thread. Referencing a post that is full of truths as reason to give red trust?
I'll  give you some time to debunk the points made in that post first. Then if you don't attempt to there must be a discussion on such trust abuse.

You can not give red trust to those making posts about you that are entirely true nothing burger malboroza.
I can't see one thing you have achieved that really made a difference here in the context of real legends. You look like a nasty little peasant beggar that got greedy and now is sig spamming and avatar spamming milking the forum whilst supporting scammers and punishing those that wish to speak out against them

Horrible little pleb.

You know what is great about dingleberries like you? You think you are smart, but in your strain to use circular logic to push your lies, you patronize everyone reading. I am sure you really believe that your strategy of accusing me of everything that is being perpetrated against me will work, but all it will serve to do is put your rep in a dumpster.

People around here might be too chicken shit to speak out about things like this, but they do read them, and they aren't stupid. They can see exactly what you are doing. No one believes marlboroza is a victim here. You know why that is? Because this thread documents clearly his repeated attempts to abuse the trust system against me in an attempt to silence my criticism of him and his red nosed buddies.



Yeah who ever heard of people abusing systems of justice to protect themselves and their friends from criticism? I might as well believe the Earth is flat right? What a conspiracy! Yes marlboroza, this thread was created as a result of you abusing the trust system against me because you want me to stop criticizing you and your buddies.

Unfortunately for you that is not what that system is for, and your repeated hamfisted attempts to justify it in the past paint a very clear picture of your motivations. If you gave a fuck about people losing money, you wouldn't be abusing the system designed to protect them from it as your own personal plaything to attack people who say things you don't like. Or you know, continue with your strategy of accusations of secondary guilt via association. What could go wrong allowing people to use the trust system to punish people for objecting to the use of the trust system? I am sure that won't have any negative consequences.

You want to discuss, but you don't want to post anything new for the sake of discussion? You are playing this "retribution for criticizing your buddies..." card all the way long.

You don't have anything else to say except "exposing fraud[1] business is retribution for calling someone out". Lets see keywords you use in your posts over and over again(from last post):


Lets check your previous post:


First post on top of this page:


Topic:


Post quoted in topic:


Post #6:


post #20:


Post #30:


Post number 44:


Post number 47:


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg53505451#msg53505451 :

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg53507689#msg53507689 :

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg53513639#msg53513639 :


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg53931684#msg53931684:


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg54177083#msg54177083:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg54177501#msg54177501:


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg54179277#msg54179277:


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg54183563#msg54183563:


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg54188671#msg54188671:


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg54190412#msg54190412:


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg54192918#msg54192918 :


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg54195999#msg54195999:


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg54202466#msg54202466:


Anything about topic and fraudulent business?

---

[1]I just figured what I wrote. Silly me, you didn't say a word about "fraud", so "striketrough". Anyway, scare quotes.

It's your own interpretation of me being at very high risk and harmful to the forum, whatever pentun hunting your doing and calling it as "investigation" is an total witch hunt, same proves an pattern which you and your friends follow to harass the user's and abuse the system to stop real criticism against you. Your cherry picking of comments is an very bad and cheap tactics to hide your ways of attacking users here. I even think many of my legimate attempts of my defense are drilled by many of your buddies.

Did TECSHARE wrote this for ya, Bump?

Yes he probably did get paid and he probably wrote the text for him to post here. Did we really think or expect anything else?



My oh my.... look who crawled out of the woodwork and still is refusing to answer your question with a mountain of evidence in front of his eyes.

Mr "pay me and I will bump your ICO thread with fake information" is deliberately avoiding answering your questions. His attention seeking buddies with all their alt-accounts are continuously trying to deflect in that thread but it will not go away.

And to think this totally inept example of a member was even on DT rank recently before unceremoniously being removed.

Morons, they are repeating this "buddies" thingy over and over again, just c/p and CTRL+F "tecshare" and read hacker's last 25 pages of post history. Well, look who is buddy now. It is Mini Me!

---

@TECSHARE are you going to update this topic or not? Updated topic should look like:


Please update your topic with relevant information.

You are claiming tecshare writes hackers posts for payment?
Hard to understand what you are malboroza are trying to express?

Marlboroza clearly has abused the red tagging here.
Only those complicit with trust abuse would support his actions.
His reference is clearly retributive due to me derailing his lack of achievements and irrefutable scammer supporting.

Why do you keep making new accounts?  I don't get it.

Why do you keep ignoring the facts that someone whose judgements you trust (http://loyce.club/trust/2020-04-11_Sat_05.25h/538922.html) is just try to frame anything he can around here. And there is no logic remained in any of his accusations. Why do you keep trusting such peoples? I don't get it.

This allows him to get one or two suckers to talk to him once he's got his previous account into everyone's ignore list.


That's not what "frame" means. You didn't get framed with plagiarism or with ICO spam, you did it yourself.

He is clearly trying to spread baseless accusations about it and frame childish shit over, there are zero evidence of his comment below.

LOL, you're too illiterate to be throwing dictionaries around. It's an opinion. Just like yours here:


Are you framing someone? Or just being a dumbass who can't even copy TECSHARE's indignant rants properly?

Hold on a second! Is this user lecturing others how to use "freedom of speech"?

---

TECSHARE where are you m8? Hope everything is OK. Please update topic with shilling for fraudulent business https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213992.msg54213781#msg54213781

Thank you! Stay safe!

It's really nice to see, that even after 2 months of ignoring reputation branch, and finally, after i've came here, everything still the same. Marlboroza still debates with Tecshare in the same topic. Heh.

Guys, coursera opened all it's courses to anyone. It's time to level up your skills. Maybe tomorrow Chipmixer will see the fate of bestmixer, so it will be better to have some useful skills, eh?  ;)

Some people will harass a person for a decade, others will simply leave trust and move on.  I wish I hadn't wasted so much time exposing your trust abuse.  :/

Do you agree he abuses trust?  Go to here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust) and add ~TECSHARE to your trust list.


Techy has a paid sig.   ;)

I have him on IGNORE therefore I could not see the signature along with the trash posting for obvious reasons  ;D



I guess the following quote (a little harsh maybe but some might cite accurate nonetheless) might be extremely valid

No, this person is shilling for fraudulent service. There was debate for previous feedback but I won't remove this one. TECSHARE is refusing to update topic with new info!

Eh, I am not sure but I don't think he is payed by post, perhaps, just to wear signature for few months...He might had case with previous feedback but now? I don't think so.

I am really curious who will support his shilling for exposed fraudulent activities, especially in form of counter feedback.

That is an interesting projection Vod, especially considering it is well documented the first negative rating I left for you was recently after your drunken doxing, harassing, and claims to have reported OGnasty to the IRS. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5142064.msg51007199#msg51007199) What is also well documented is your abuse of the trust system against me multiple times spanning over the last 5 years (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=915823.580). Also I haven't been a member of the forum for 10 years yet, so that would be kind of hard wouldn't it? Not that you care about facts. As far as my signature, I get paid a flat fee regardless of how often I post, so unlike most of the rest of you knob gobblers it provides me no additional motivation to make unnecessary posts.

Well, I did report OG, he was audited in October and apparently he paid the large fine.

I wasn't aware at the time he had over $14,000,000USD in scammed funds (at today's prices) - the fine did nothing to him but focus revenge on me.  PROOF IS IN THE BLOCKCHAIN.

While people on this forum are facing hardships of every kind right now - OG is paying for his illegal activities with your money.  :/

I'll let the rest of your mentally ill post go.  I'm not wasting any more time on your trust abuse.  

I don't think last two posts have anything with this topic, but as this section is almost not moderated who gives a fuck anyway.

@TECSHARE when are you going to update topic with this (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213992.msg54216105#msg54216105)? I think you should either update topic or marked it as resolved and lock it, just suggestion.

No problem. Lets just keep it on top with this:


People usually read OP and skip to last post, I don't want them to miss anything you are trying to hide.

I wonder if users are aware that you have included abuser (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5251014.0) to your trust network out of spite http://loyce.club/trust/2020-05-23_Sat_05.03h/15728.html together with ICO bump account (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.0).

Yes, very convincing, especially after the long history of your trust abuse in this thread leading you to be booted from the default trust. Guilt via association? No, guilt via association with associates of guilt via association. That is some rock solid damning proof you got there, and certainly not just a pathetic excuse for abuse of the trust system!

Elaborate this  ??? ??? ???

Here is a list of all the people responsible for enabling marlboroza's trust system abuse:

qwk
Foxpup
KWH
TMAN
Lauda
Nestade
yogg
stompix
hilariousandco
Avirune
cryptodevil
suchmoon
JayJuanGee
NeuroticFish
examplens
tmfp
Thule
LoyceV
actmyname
The Pharmacist
LeGaulois
SFR10
johhnyUA
condoras
Lafu
IconFirm
HCP
Hhampuz
blurryeyed
xtraelv
4FF
Scheede
JollyGood
roycilik
hugeblack
tweetbit
mosprognoz
Trofo
Steamtyme
icopress
theyoungmillionaire
o_e_l_e_o
iasenko
pandukelana2712
coinlocket$
witcher_sense
r1s2g3
cabalism13
tracyspacy
Alex_Sr
bubbalex
Hellmouth42
morvillz7z
RajeshKarwa
Coolcryptovator
DireWolfM14
TalkStar
1miau
ICOEthics
S_Therapist

That list is not correct.

Elaborate.

most of them trust abusers and corrupt officials
suchmoon, Lafu, Tman and other morons

default trust system is ruined
rules not work ( lauda not banned )

Darn tooting.  My name is not there.  Fixing that now...

Maybe Tec's hare tried to point accounts which should exclude him from DT?

I don't like any drama here and conspiracy theories just because of trust-distrust someone or support/oppose flag.
why it is difficult to accept that someone has a different opinion?
In my case, my trust list is based on someone’s posts and how realistic that person is in their story. I don't want to get involved in anyone's conflicts, nor in from this topic, and that does not affect my judgment in my trust list.
that’s all I have to say in this thread (I am mentioned here).

Thanks for more proof you support and personally engage in trust system abuse (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=915823.msg54482933#msg54482933) Yosemite Sam.

How do I get on this list? 

For some reason TS grabbed a relatively ancient version of marlboroza's included by list and used it as the basis for his new list. So I don't know, its a mystery.

I can't believe I never had marlboroza in my trust list. I must have misspelled his name when I originally set up my list a long time ago. What an embarrassing oversight.

Marlboroza should not be in any sane person's trust list who knows what type of abuse they support and even do as noted in this thread itself. Anyone trusting them is supporting groupism and mobbing here overall and is against neutral and unbiased judgement.

Get me out of DT1 ! LoL !  ???

You claim you misspelled it - I think it was trust abuse.   :P

marlboroza has a suggestive name and I often misspell it too.  Used to live here (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marlborough,_Calgary) and  saw his face everywhere. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marlboro_Man)

marlboroza is a good guy.  The fact the trolls hate him "proves" it to me.  I should thank him for that "proof", but that would lower the reputation/expectation of my future proof.

Here is the real list of marlboroza's filthy enablers (current DT1 who have included him, plus me):

Balthazar
Vod
Foxpup
Avirunes
suchmoon
JayJuanGee
Royse777
LoyceV
actmyname
SFR10
TwitchySeal
xtraelv
crwth
nullius
KTChampions
tvplus006
gospodin
witcher_sense
Alex_Sr
morvillz7z
Coolcryptovator
lovesmayfamilis
DireWolfM14
TalkStar
1miau
YOSHIE

Hmm... one of them you even have included in your own trust list. Better run this by the Objective Standards Guild to see how it fits in with your prescribed principles.


Could be... To think I was sitting next to him in the Clown Car all this time, and I was actually riding in the trunk...

I removed marlboroza from my trust list a long time ago I think because from what I recall he specifically asked to not be added to any list.

Maybe that has since changed, if it has I would like to add him too.

So you removed him because he asked?   That's trust abuse! 

Be careful - if you trust someone and they ask you not to, do you trust them enough to not trust them?

https://youtu.be/EzVxsYzXI_Y?t=89

I've read this few times lol.
You will need one of these:
https://i.imgur.com/i8TLLdj.png
Heey, I thought you are the one driving clown car! Damn red nose confused me!

---

Elaborate (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213992.msg54499570#msg54499570)

Thanks everyone posting for making it public knowledge you treat the trust system as a plaything and actively add people explicitly because they abuse the trust system by leaving negative ratings for the high crime of disagreeing with their accusations.

Elaborate.

marlboroza   2020-05-26   Reference (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5251014.msg54506757#msg54506757)   Liar. Maliciously hijacking topic.


So this is what the trust system is reduced to now is it? If you disagree with people you get a red tag. If you seek redress from the community for the abuse of the system, they add the abuser and treat the system not only like a joke, but as a tool to harass people. This system which is supposed to protect people from fraud is simply a toy for you to play with, and like all naughty little children you should have your toys taken away. If this is the standard for the trust system now, Theymos should probably just scrub negative ratings and go exclusively with flags backed by evidence of theft, contractual violation, or violation of applicable laws. If this community has proven anything, it is that it simply is not mature enough to enforce any kind of self restraint or equitable standards.

There is your disconnection, troll.  Why would the community help you when you abuse trust?   Clean your hands.

What trust abuse Vod? Be specific.

The negative trust you have left for people you do not like.

Or the refusal of the same type of explanations you demand from others. 

That is not very specific Vod.

Don't forget this one: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5182530.msg52385837#msg52385837

See:







So Vod, clearly I abuse the trust system according to you... why is it whenever anyone asks you to substantiate your claims you can never do it and always default to just claiming you already have?

Because he has.

Check the reference link for the negative feedback he left you for abusing the trust system.

I get it, you don't agree that with him - but he's already explained why he did it and it's been explained to you countless times.  Continuing to ask won't change anything.

He really hasn't. The reference is nutlduuh making assumptions about why I included people based on nothing whatsoever. As you can see above Nutilduuh freely admitted it was nothing but an assumption. If assumptions are the standard of evidence then I guess we can assume you and Vod both get together to rob children of their milk money. Making baseless assumptions is fun!

Yes it's an assumption.  But it's not baseless.

The feedback you've left him is also an assumption.  And also not baseless.

We all make assumptions all the time, including you.  There's no need to point it out every time.

Stop ignoring questions if you want others to answer, troll.  You accuse marlboroza in this thread; he is allowed to defend himself.

Yes, baseless. It is like seeing a guy eating a sandwich, and some one yells "HEY YOU STOLE THAT SANDWICH!" Only he didn't see the sandwich get stolen, he just assumed it was, either because the person yelling doesn't like the guy eating the sandwich or has some issues of their own. Then when asked for proof the only response is "Well it looked like a sandwich I saw stolen before, so it must be!"

Actually the feedback I left Vod is documented fact. No one disputes Vod doxed OGNasty and claimed to have reported him to the IRS. As far as the comment regarding his mental state, I have repeatedly offered to modify the rating and replace it excluding that part if he feels that would make it a valid rating, but he refuses to respond. Vod avoids a direct response at all costs, because he is well aware his actions are indefensible.

https://i.gyazo.com/a784273731b1199a16e0b28c49318eb1.png

How is what vod will do in the future a documented fact and not an assumption?  Do you have a crystal ball or something?  Does vod have access to everyones doxx?

I understand he doxxed OG, but that's not proof he will doxx anyone else who criticizes him.

Sometimes I ask myself if I made a mistake by adding most of the trolls and attention-seeking users along with the general riff-raff to my IGNORE list because I seem to be missing out on large chunks of the picture when reading posts by those users I quite enjoy reading.

All things said and done I see no reason to unIGNORE those that cause friction within the forum, it is better for me to keep ignoring them all.

He did it. It is a valid reason for a rating, not trust abuse. You enjoy your semantic gymnastics.

You are claiming he will do it again.  Do you think that's a provable fact or an assumption?

Do you have proof he reported OG to government agencies?  Or are you assuming that he did that.

He did that, and it's documented and self declared by himself. You really should seek doctor's help for your mental disorders.

How did you even got in a paid signature campaign ?

@TwitchySeal

Do you see the sorts of low-life riff-raff that are floating about in this forum? Even when you stay calm and try to engage with them in a manner which can only be described as polite and courteous, they always fall back on their usual insult laden ways either by posting directly or by using proxies.

Lets talk about word baseless, no matter what context in that post is.

Baseless:


Baseless:


Baseless:


I will contact dictionary to include those 3 examples of "baseless" to their site, I am sure they will love it.

One only needs to review this thread to find documentation for my claims.

Of course.  I think it's kind of fascinating the way they behave.  At first I thought it was just an act and they were just trolling for the sake of trolling, but in many cases I think they honestly believe what they are saying to be true.

For example TECSHARE will never admit he's wrong.  I don't recall him ever changing his mind either.  To him, opinions are a form of weakness - his opinions are actually facts and you can't disagree with facts.
His obsession with trying to convince people he's a trust abuse victim and the mods have been conspiring against him is what makes me think he actually believes what he's saying.  This has been going on for years.  

Some of his greatest hits:

• Hippietech's abuse of the trust system in attempt to silence criticism of him (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1095023.0)
  
• VOD should be removed from default trust for systematic abuse of his position (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=915823.0)
  
• REMOVE NUBBINS FROM THE DEFAULT TRUST LIST FOR REPEATED TRUST ABUSE (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=935984.0)
  
• REEE: Never argue with Vod, he will abuse the trust and stalk you for years (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5152117.0)
  
• Trust System Abuse By TMAN (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5225907.0)
  
• More trust abuse by marlboroza (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213992.0)
  
• More trust system abuse by Lauda (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5210651.0)
  
• Trust System Abuse By Nullius (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5221450.0)
  
• Post Reporting Being Used As A Tool Of Harassment and Censorship (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5224547.0)
  
• FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5103785.0)
  
• More censorship by Flying Hellfish (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5062023.0)
  
• Koshgel Sold Account - Abusing Trust System (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5162255.0)
  
• Question for The Pharmacist (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5251288)
  
• Is excluding people just because some one you don't like includes them valid? (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5251037\)
  

Hey, what about me allegedly abusing the trust system by excluding users that happen to be included by TECSHARE (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5251037)? Or The Pharmacist allegedly abusing the trust system by excluding TECSHARE (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5251288)?

Perhaps not the greatest hits though, just random hits and misses. Chasing the clown car and trying to bite the tires.

I agree with all of this, and it's led him to leaving unwarranted feedback in the past--which is the reason why he was voted off DT years ago.  I want to bury the hatchet and un-exclude TECSHARE on my trust list, but I just can't get around his continued behavior and the more I read the less rational and more paranoid I find his thinking to be, and I can't justify not excluding someone like him from my trust list. 

I had to check, but I guess I don't have mixan ~'ed on my trust list, but he's an example of a member who went completely off the rails.  Since he basically rage-quit the forum and abandoned his account, it's not a huge deal if I have him excluded or left him a neg--but it's a different story altogether with TECSHARE.  If he would at least try to work on dropping the persecution complex, I'd at least un-exclude him, but he just doesn't see the problem.  In his view, everyone else is wrong and he's in the right--always.  Rarely in life is that the case, and it isn't the case with him.

Yeah what an irrational persecution complex I have in a thread about the trust system being abused against me, with people endorsing the abuse, and turning the topic itself into an off topic focus on me by all the abusers and promoters of said abuse that the moderators refuse to act on. It is clearly all in my head. Thanks for proving you would rather be liar (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5251288.msg54507872#msg54507872) than an honest man and simply own up to your decisions. Welcome back to the mob.

Well, this thread does involve you and your accusation against marlboroza so I don't think all or even most of the discussion is off-topic when it starts to come back to talking about you and how you're perceiving things.

I'm not saying all of this is in your head, because I've seen you make some valid points before, but when your mode of thinking is so rigid and inflexible, even constructive criticism (which is what I'm trying to give you) is seen as a full-blown attack.  Speaking only for myself, that isn't how I intend it.

I'm not in a mob against you.  But on a related note, when I speak of a persecution complex (and paranoia), statements like that are what I mean.

Added both.
See above.

Threads TECSHARE has started to complain about 'trust abuse' and 'censorship':

• Hippietech's abuse of the trust system in attempt to silence criticism of him (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1095023.0)
  
• VOD should be removed from default trust for systematic abuse of his position (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=915823.0)
  
• REMOVE NUBBINS FROM THE DEFAULT TRUST LIST FOR REPEATED TRUST ABUSE (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=935984.0)
  
• REEE: Never argue with Vod, he will abuse the trust and stalk you for years (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5152117.0)
  
• Trust System Abuse By TMAN (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5225907.0)
  
• More trust abuse by marlboroza (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213992.0)
  
• More trust system abuse by Lauda (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5210651.0)
  
• Trust System Abuse By Nullius (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5221450.0)
  
• Post Reporting Being Used As A Tool Of Harassment and Censorship (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5224547.0)
  
• FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5103785.0)
  
• More censorship by Flying Hellfish (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5062023.0)
  
• Koshgel Sold Account - Abusing Trust System (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5162255.0)
  
• Question for The Pharmacist (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5251288)
  
• Is excluding people just because some one you don't like includes them valid? (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5251037\)
  
• REEE™: madnessteat (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213992.msg54520374#msg54520374)
  
• REEE: [NSFW] - phisical violence in DT - "not safe for work" content (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5183844.0)
  
• REEE: Puppet Show (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5149597.0)
  
• REEE: What's wrong with Vod, and Hhampuz (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5143502.0)
  
  
  Edit: added 4 more.

Yes, of course your "mode of thinking" is above reproach, but mine is "rigid and inflexible" because I don't agree with you, or any of the other red nosed klan members around here who have demonstrated themselves to be very reasonable, flexible, honest, and understanding now haven't they? After all, ones opinions must bend to the will of perceived "popular" consensus in order to be valid right? Unless I bend the knee, then I am just unreasonable and everything I say is invalid, along with my judgement. Does that about sum it up? I saw a good deal on red noses and white face paint yesterday if you want a link. They also had a BOGO coupon for ball polish you might find useful.

This user just gave me negative rep along probably some of his friends. ( marlboroza  )

edit - The Pharmacist is also linked.

edit2 - looking at the thread suchmoon is also linked.

Let's see. You demand a no-collateral loan and get rejected. You attack the lender and get red trust. Then you delete your posts and cook-up a fake scam accusation against the lender while at the same time claiming that you haven't had any deals with them. And finally you demand that moderators force the lender to give you money and/or remove your red trust.

Does that sum it up? Sounds like you're a good candidate for TECSHARE's guild of twerps, just make sure to praise him twice a day.

I read your comment in "Z", don't really care for your words, I know I did nothing wrong and never dealt with any user which gave me bad rep, I also notice the side of bitcointalk where you and your friends are is the negative one.

Perhaps you supporting the new satoshi school?  ;D

Did you deal with The Pharmacist and LoyceV? You gave them "bad rep" for no plausible reason whatsoever (not that retaliatory ratings against other users have a good reason either).

I know this is a throwaway account for you that you hoped to cash out for ~$60 but you're just wasting your time now. Go back to your 2011 account.

You mad!  ::)

My house my rules.

No response from TECSHARE about this so I will bump this topic and I ask tecshare again to elaborate his accusations (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213992.msg54517272#msg54517272) or apologize.

---

@Vod, did you know that TECSHARE trusts (http://loyce.club/trust/2020-06-06_Sat_05.05h/15728.html) sockpuppets people who threatened forum member that they will report them to government agencies because they said something against them/they don't like?

Start reading from here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095156.msg54568039#msg54568039, you'll figure out who am I talking about  ;)  (just in case something disappear http://archive.is/FZzEp)

What exactly is your problem here?

What exactly are your valid concerns regarding the manner in which certain members are treating you?