More trust abuse by marlboroza

[TECSHARE]

Yes it's an assumption.  But it's not baseless.

The feedback you've left him is also an assumption.  And also not baseless.

We all make assumptions all the time, including you.  There's no need to point it out every time.

Yes, baseless. It is like seeing a guy eating a sandwich, and some one yells "HEY YOU STOLE THAT SANDWICH!" Only he didn't see the sandwich get stolen, he just assumed it was, either because the person yelling doesn't like the guy eating the sandwich or has some issues of their own. Then when asked for proof the only response is "Well it looked like a sandwich I saw stolen before, so it must be!"

Actually the feedback I left Vod is documented fact. No one disputes Vod doxed OGNasty and claimed to have reported him to the IRS. As far as the comment regarding his mental state, I have repeatedly offered to modify the rating and replace it excluding that part if he feels that would make it a valid rating, but he refuses to respond. Vod avoids a direct response at all costs, because he is well aware his actions are indefensible.

[TwitchySeal]

Actually the feedback I left Vod is documented fact. No one disputes Vod doxed OGNasty and claimed to have reported him to the IRS. As far as the comment regarding his mental state, I have repeatedly offered to modify the rating and replace it excluding that part if he feels that would make it a valid rating, but he refuses to respond. Vod avoids a direct response at all costs, because he is well aware his actions are indefensible.

How is what vod will do in the future a documented fact and not an assumption?  Do you have a crystal ball or something?  Does vod have access to everyones doxx?

I understand he doxxed OG, but that's not proof he will doxx anyone else who criticizes him.

[JollyGood]

Sometimes I ask myself if I made a mistake by adding most of the trolls and attention-seeking users along with the general riff-raff to my IGNORE list because I seem to be missing out on large chunks of the picture when reading posts by those users I quite enjoy reading.

All things said and done I see no reason to unIGNORE those that cause friction within the forum, it is better for me to keep ignoring them all.

[TECSHARE]

Actually the feedback I left Vod is documented fact. No one disputes Vod doxed OGNasty and claimed to have reported him to the IRS. As far as the comment regarding his mental state, I have repeatedly offered to modify the rating and replace it excluding that part if he feels that would make it a valid rating, but he refuses to respond. Vod avoids a direct response at all costs, because he is well aware his actions are indefensible.

How is what vod will do in the future a documented fact and not an assumption?  Do you have a crystal ball or something?  Does vod have access to everyones doxx?

I understand he doxxed OG, but that's not proof he will doxx anyone else who criticizes him.

He did it. It is a valid reason for a rating, not trust abuse. You enjoy your semantic gymnastics.

[TwitchySeal]

Actually the feedback I left Vod is documented fact. No one disputes Vod doxed OGNasty and claimed to have reported him to the IRS. As far as the comment regarding his mental state, I have repeatedly offered to modify the rating and replace it excluding that part if he feels that would make it a valid rating, but he refuses to respond. Vod avoids a direct response at all costs, because he is well aware his actions are indefensible.

How is what vod will do in the future a documented fact and not an assumption?  Do you have a crystal ball or something?  Does vod have access to everyones doxx?

I understand he doxxed OG, but that's not proof he will doxx anyone else who criticizes him.

He did it. It is a valid reason for a rating, not trust abuse. You enjoy your semantic gymnastics.

You are claiming he will do it again.  Do you think that's a provable fact or an assumption?

Do you have proof he reported OG to government agencies?  Or are you assuming that he did that.

[hacker1001101001]

Actually the feedback I left Vod is documented fact. No one disputes Vod doxed OGNasty and claimed to have reported him to the IRS. As far as the comment regarding his mental state, I have repeatedly offered to modify the rating and replace it excluding that part if he feels that would make it a valid rating, but he refuses to respond. Vod avoids a direct response at all costs, because he is well aware his actions are indefensible.

How is what vod will do in the future a documented fact and not an assumption?  Do you have a crystal ball or something?  Does vod have access to everyones doxx?

I understand he doxxed OG, but that's not proof he will doxx anyone else who criticizes him.

He did it. It is a valid reason for a rating, not trust abuse. You enjoy your semantic gymnastics.

You are claiming he will do it again.  Do you think that's a provable fact or an assumption?

Do you have proof he reported OG to government agencies?  Or are you assuming that he did that.

He did that, and it's documented and self declared by himself. You really should seek doctor's help for your mental disorders.

How did you even got in a paid signature campaign ?

[JollyGood]

@TwitchySeal

Do you see the sorts of low-life riff-raff that are floating about in this forum? Even when you stay calm and try to engage with them in a manner which can only be described as polite and courteous, they always fall back on their usual insult laden ways either by posting directly or by using proxies.

Actually the feedback I left Vod is documented fact. No one disputes Vod doxed OGNasty and claimed to have reported him to the IRS. As far as the comment regarding his mental state, I have repeatedly offered to modify the rating and replace it excluding that part if he feels that would make it a valid rating, but he refuses to respond. Vod avoids a direct response at all costs, because he is well aware his actions are indefensible.

How is what vod will do in the future a documented fact and not an assumption?  Do you have a crystal ball or something?  Does vod have access to everyones doxx?

I understand he doxxed OG, but that's not proof he will doxx anyone else who criticizes him.

He did it. It is a valid reason for a rating, not trust abuse. You enjoy your semantic gymnastics.

You are claiming he will do it again.  Do you think that's a provable fact or an assumption?

Do you have proof he reported OG to government agencies?  Or are you assuming that he did that.

He did that, and it's documented and self declared by himself. You really should seek doctor's help for your mental disorders.

How did you even got in a paid signature campaign ?

[marlboroza]

baseless

Lets talk about word baseless, no matter what context in that post is.

Baseless:

~

Yes, very convincing, especially after the long history of your trust abuse in this thread leading you to be booted from the default trust. [...]

Elaborate this  

Baseless:

This thread itself documents several instances of negative rating abuse by Marlboroza, of which he was forced to remove under public pressure.

Baseless:

Certain users like marlboroza are intent on using "off topic" reports as a tool to silence any valid criticism against them. I am going to start reposting deleted posts in their appropriate thread so everyone can see exactly just how many off topic posts I have to defend myself from, and just how eager the mods are to delete my defenses, in my own threads, defending myself from these endless wild accusations.

~
I didn't report it

I will contact dictionary to include those 3 examples of "baseless" to their site, I am sure they will love it.

[TECSHARE]

[baseless]

One only needs to review this thread to find documentation for my claims.

[TwitchySeal]

@TwitchySeal

Do you see the sorts of low-life riff-raff that are floating about in this forum? Even when you stay calm and try to engage with them in a manner which can only be described as polite and courteous, they always fall back on their usual insult laden ways either by posting directly or by using proxies.

Of course.  I think it's kind of fascinating the way they behave.  At first I thought it was just an act and they were just trolling for the sake of trolling, but in many cases I think they honestly believe what they are saying to be true.

For example TECSHARE will never admit he's wrong.  I don't recall him ever changing his mind either.  To him, opinions are a form of weakness - his opinions are actually facts and you can't disagree with facts.
His obsession with trying to convince people he's a trust abuse victim and the mods have been conspiring against him is what makes me think he actually believes what he's saying.  This has been going on for years.  

Some of his greatest hits:

• Hippietech's abuse of the trust system in attempt to silence criticism of him
  
• VOD should be removed from default trust for systematic abuse of his position
  
• REMOVE NUBBINS FROM THE DEFAULT TRUST LIST FOR REPEATED TRUST ABUSE
  
• REEE: Never argue with Vod, he will abuse the trust and stalk you for years
  
• Trust System Abuse By TMAN
  
• More trust abuse by marlboroza
  
• More trust system abuse by Lauda
  
• Trust System Abuse By Nullius
  
• Post Reporting Being Used As A Tool Of Harassment and Censorship
  
• FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
  
• More censorship by Flying Hellfish
  
• Koshgel Sold Account - Abusing Trust System
  
• Question for The Pharmacist
  
• Is excluding people just because some one you don't like includes them valid?
  

[suchmoon]

Some of his greatest hits:

Hey, what about me allegedly abusing the trust system by excluding users that happen to be included by TECSHARE? Or The Pharmacist allegedly abusing the trust system by excluding TECSHARE?

Perhaps not the greatest hits though, just random hits and misses. Chasing the clown car and trying to bite the tires.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

For example TECSHARE will never admit he's wrong.  I don't recall him ever changing his mind either.  To him, opinions are a form of weakness - his opinions are actually facts and you can't disagree with facts.
His obsession with trying to convince people he's a trust abuse victim and the mods have been conspiring against him is what makes me think he actually believes what he's saying.  This has been going on for years. 

I agree with all of this, and it's led him to leaving unwarranted feedback in the past--which is the reason why he was voted off DT years ago.  I want to bury the hatchet and un-exclude TECSHARE on my trust list, but I just can't get around his continued behavior and the more I read the less rational and more paranoid I find his thinking to be, and I can't justify not excluding someone like him from my trust list. 

I had to check, but I guess I don't have mixan ~'ed on my trust list, but he's an example of a member who went completely off the rails.  Since he basically rage-quit the forum and abandoned his account, it's not a huge deal if I have him excluded or left him a neg--but it's a different story altogether with TECSHARE.  If he would at least try to work on dropping the persecution complex, I'd at least un-exclude him, but he just doesn't see the problem.  In his view, everyone else is wrong and he's in the right--always.  Rarely in life is that the case, and it isn't the case with him.

[TECSHARE]

For example TECSHARE will never admit he's wrong.  I don't recall him ever changing his mind either.  To him, opinions are a form of weakness - his opinions are actually facts and you can't disagree with facts.
His obsession with trying to convince people he's a trust abuse victim and the mods have been conspiring against him is what makes me think he actually believes what he's saying.  This has been going on for years.  

I agree with all of this, and it's led him to leaving unwarranted feedback in the past--which is the reason why he was voted off DT years ago.  I want to bury the hatchet and un-exclude TECSHARE on my trust list, but I just can't get around his continued behavior and the more I read the less rational and more paranoid I find his thinking to be, and I can't justify not excluding someone like him from my trust list.  

I had to check, but I guess I don't have mixan ~'ed on my trust list, but he's an example of a member who went completely off the rails.  Since he basically rage-quit the forum and abandoned his account, it's not a huge deal if I have him excluded or left him a neg--but it's a different story altogether with TECSHARE.  If he would at least try to work on dropping the persecution complex, I'd at least un-exclude him, but he just doesn't see the problem.  In his view, everyone else is wrong and he's in the right--always.  Rarely in life is that the case, and it isn't the case with him.

Yeah what an irrational persecution complex I have in a thread about the trust system being abused against me, with people endorsing the abuse, and turning the topic itself into an off topic focus on me by all the abusers and promoters of said abuse that the moderators refuse to act on. It is clearly all in my head. Thanks for proving you would rather be liar than an honest man and simply own up to your decisions. Welcome back to the mob.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

<snip>turning the topic itself into an off topic focus on me by all the abusers and promoters of said abuse that the moderators refuse to act on.

Well, this thread does involve you and your accusation against marlboroza so I don't think all or even most of the discussion is off-topic when it starts to come back to talking about you and how you're perceiving things.

It is clearly all in my head. Thanks for proving you would rather be liar than an honest man and simply own up to your decisions. Welcome back to the mob.

I'm not saying all of this is in your head, because I've seen you make some valid points before, but when your mode of thinking is so rigid and inflexible, even constructive criticism (which is what I'm trying to give you) is seen as a full-blown attack.  Speaking only for myself, that isn't how I intend it.

Welcome back to the mob.

I'm not in a mob against you.  But on a related note, when I speak of a persecution complex (and paranoia), statements like that are what I mean.

[TwitchySeal]

Hey, what about me allegedly abusing the trust system by excluding users that happen to be included by TECSHARE? Or The Pharmacist allegedly abusing the trust system by excluding TECSHARE?

Added both.

Thanks for proving you would rather be liar

See above.

Threads TECSHARE has started to complain about 'trust abuse' and 'censorship':

• Hippietech's abuse of the trust system in attempt to silence criticism of him
  
• VOD should be removed from default trust for systematic abuse of his position
  
• REMOVE NUBBINS FROM THE DEFAULT TRUST LIST FOR REPEATED TRUST ABUSE
  
• REEE: Never argue with Vod, he will abuse the trust and stalk you for years
  
• Trust System Abuse By TMAN
  
• More trust abuse by marlboroza
  
• More trust system abuse by Lauda
  
• Trust System Abuse By Nullius
  
• Post Reporting Being Used As A Tool Of Harassment and Censorship
  
• FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
  
• More censorship by Flying Hellfish
  
• Koshgel Sold Account - Abusing Trust System
  
• Question for The Pharmacist
  
• Is excluding people just because some one you don't like includes them valid?
  
• REEE™: madnessteat
  
• REEE: [NSFW] - phisical violence in DT - "not safe for work" content
  
• REEE: Puppet Show
  
• REEE: What's wrong with Vod, and Hhampuz
  
  
  Edit: added 4 more.

[TECSHARE]

<snip>turning the topic itself into an off topic focus on me by all the abusers and promoters of said abuse that the moderators refuse to act on.

Well, this thread does involve you and your accusation against marlboroza so I don't think all or even most of the discussion is off-topic when it starts to come back to talking about you and how you're perceiving things.

It is clearly all in my head. Thanks for proving you would rather be liar than an honest man and simply own up to your decisions. Welcome back to the mob.

I'm not saying all of this is in your head, because I've seen you make some valid points before, but when your mode of thinking is so rigid and inflexible, even constructive criticism (which is what I'm trying to give you) is seen as a full-blown attack.  Speaking only for myself, that isn't how I intend it.

Welcome back to the mob.

I'm not in a mob against you.  But on a related note, when I speak of a persecution complex (and paranoia), statements like that are what I mean.

Yes, of course your "mode of thinking" is above reproach, but mine is "rigid and inflexible" because I don't agree with you, or any of the other red nosed klan members around here who have demonstrated themselves to be very reasonable, flexible, honest, and understanding now haven't they? After all, ones opinions must bend to the will of perceived "popular" consensus in order to be valid right? Unless I bend the knee, then I am just unreasonable and everything I say is invalid, along with my judgement. Does that about sum it up? I saw a good deal on red noses and white face paint yesterday if you want a link. They also had a BOGO coupon for ball polish you might find useful.

[intec]

This user just gave me negative rep along probably some of his friends. ( marlboroza  )

edit - The Pharmacist is also linked.

edit2 - looking at the thread suchmoon is also linked.

[suchmoon]

~

Let's see. You demand a no-collateral loan and get rejected. You attack the lender and get red trust. Then you delete your posts and cook-up a fake scam accusation against the lender while at the same time claiming that you haven't had any deals with them. And finally you demand that moderators force the lender to give you money and/or remove your red trust.

Does that sum it up? Sounds like you're a good candidate for TECSHARE's guild of twerps, just make sure to praise him twice a day.

[intec]

~

Let's see. You demand a no-collateral loan and get rejected. You attack the lender and get red trust. Then you delete your posts and cook-up a fake scam accusation against the lender while at the same time claiming that you haven't had any deals with them. And finally you demand that moderators force the lender to give you money and/or remove your red trust.

Does that sum it up? Sounds like you're a good candidate for TECSHARE's guild of twerps, just make sure to praise him twice a day.

I read your comment in "Z", don't really care for your words, I know I did nothing wrong and never dealt with any user which gave me bad rep, I also notice the side of bitcointalk where you and your friends are is the negative one.

Perhaps you supporting the new satoshi school? 

[suchmoon]

I did nothing wrong and never dealt with any user which gave me bad rep

Did you deal with The Pharmacist and LoyceV? You gave them "bad rep" for no plausible reason whatsoever (not that retaliatory ratings against other users have a good reason either).

I know this is a throwaway account for you that you hoped to cash out for ~$60 but you're just wasting your time now. Go back to your 2011 account.