Bitcoin Forum

Edit - the contest has ended, congratulations to winners: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5217571.msg53846998#msg53846998

---

cryptohunter is going to leave this forum:


Obviously no one who has seen him troll the shit out of this place for the last 15 months or so believes that.

Assuming that he comes back with another sockpuppet account, what will it be? Guess the username and if you turn out to be right or close - I may award you one merit, at my discretion.

My guess is that it's going to be something cringy and boastful, like DebateCrusher.

It may be cryptohunter0,1,2,3,29.

Maybe this is going to be something similar to cryptohunter.
If I were him, I would go fot "cryptohaunted"  ;D

PrimeNumber8

[Gasp!] Are you insinuating that cryptohunter may be telling a fib?  He's not actually leaving, but merely moving on to a new account?  

What are the odds he's taking a page out of QuickSeller's book and try to develop his own PrimeNumber7?  Could it be that he'll actually drop all the "inconvenient truths," "provable facts," and "observable instances" and be content to participate in the forum in a healthy and productive way?  Oh, one can only dream.

One of the things that obviously caused him much angst early last year was the fact that he lost his YuTü.Co.in job, and realized that with it went the potential to earn from other signature campaigns.  I doubt Bruno would give him a job with all the shit he's been spreading the last year.  Of course he'll deny this and continue to pretend he's wealthy and set to retire in Bali or some such place.  Maybe he's finally tired of being broke and continuing to dig himself deeper and deeper into the troll hole.

Anyway, if he does come back with another troll account my guess is that it'll be named "Inconvenient Truths, My Precious."

The Moron Above No-one, or TMAN for short.

CraigWright

I will join in if you make it more than 1 merit.
Let me know within 1 hour though because I can't hang around. I need to get going.
Does it count if you know cryptohunter? and can ask him?

Wouldn't that amount to an observable instance of merit abuse?

Suchmoon would not abuse merit. Please don't suggest such things.

I wouldn't want to interfere with your going. Merry travels.

Begging for merit on your way out is a nice touch though.

I was thinking cryptogiver, thinking that he was part of this thread. I'm guessing that someone who would choose a name like cryptohunter might have evolved to cryptoconqueror.

You must be clairvoyant....



 ::)

Lemme guess, SatoshiWright?

Everything I said has to be wright :D

notcryptohunter ;D

Observable-Instances-of-Irrefutable-Proof™

FullMoon. :)

Maybe Realcryptohunter  :D

Picking a new name account can be such a hassle, i think we are helping cryptohunter by giving clever suggestions here...

Anyway just for the fun of it: TheTruth

Iamnotback....

Oh damn!!!!!!  ::) ::)

Since you started a topic like this he might come up with Fuckmoon  :D.
FailedHunter or "DT1  DUMB TURDS1" according to one of his posts is not bad either ;).

Cryptovictim? ???

So what was the new name that he chose? Did I win?

We don't yet and we won't know until huge walls of text start spreading again in Meta.

Of course we won't be able to prove that its him, just like we couldn't prove TOAA was cryptohunter, or that Craig Wright isn't Satoshi, or that the earth isn't flat, and other such common sense, easily discernible realities. Don't know how we live with ourselves.

There is a good chance that this is the new account: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2758665

I think we have a tie with these two guesses, so I'm awarding half a merit each, rounded up:

I think it is Tigerdam

I'm not so sure.  His language, vocabulary, and ability to adhere to a specific topic without going hyperbolic seem to indict a different pompous, wall-posting windbag.  The attempts to point the bloodhounds into CH's direction (and away form the one whom I suspect) seem quite calculated, in fact.

I'm sure. The sheer involvement of time they have already put into the account means its them. I feel the chance is greater its CH trying hard not to be CH but still failing, as opposed to someone is carefully emulating their comeback attempt. Don't understand why someone would try to be them: dramatically spraying diarrhea everywhere. I put them on ignore already.

Do you think the real legend cryptohunter would let it slide if some impersonator was running around here?

truth or dare ?

Minus one merit for you for not reading the thread. This has been resolved weeks ago :)

Will update OP now.

Oh well, what about that:


Would the real CH allow such act of lèse majesté  ???


Was it? :) The truth is out there.

I didn't see any  UNDENIABLE evidence that was BACKED by SEVERAL OBSERVABLE INSTANCES that this thread was marked as resolved.

The topic needs to be resurrected, as truth or dare (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2758665) is inactive since March 10th, 2020. Arguably, the legacy was inherited by bonesjonesreturns (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2771981), but this account is also offline since June 8th, 2020.

Any prognostic for the next account?

cryptohunter is back and he's in top shape: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2810185

I'm sorry, you should have guessed before he reappeared, not after lol. No merit for you this time! :)

It is difficult to predict the name he will enter again, but it will definitely be close to his previous name cryptohunter. I expect the name to be btchunter.

...said Mor254 which, eagerly looking for the merit, not just he did not bother at all to read the previous 37 posts of the topic, but he didn't bother to read at least the last two posts lol. No merit for you either!

FML

This whole thing is a scam obviously. Please support type 3 flag against the OP.

According to Cryptohunter, such a request makes you unethical scum. I would support it, but then I'd get accused of collusion. Instead, I would suggest everyone should oppose it, but then we are back at square one.

A real moral dilemma.

We should guess who the first walking facepalm will be to send them a merit.

My money is on PN7/QS

You spelled "moran" (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5264620.msg54984798#msg54984798) wrong.


Statistically it should be Vispilio:

https://bpip.org/Profile?id=2771981
https://bpip.org/Profile?id=2758665

OP should receive a bun (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5241511.msg54247738#msg54247738) from mods for smuggling 1 (one) merit. This is totally unnaceptable!!!

Close enough, it was OgNasty: https://bpip.org/smerit.aspx?to=Laudanum