You may win 1 (one!!!!) whole merit if you guess cryptohunter's new username

[BChydro]

My guess is that it's going to be something cringy and boastful, like DebateCrusher.

Since you started a topic like this he might come up with Fuckmoon  .
FailedHunter or "DT1  DUMB TURDS1" according to one of his posts is not bad either .

[1714746619]

1714746619

[1714746619]

1714746619

[1714746619]

1714746619

[kraiwoc2]

Cryptovictim?

[Lightsource]

~
My guess is that it's going to be something cringy and boastful...

You must be clairvoyant....

~

 

So what was the new name that he chose? Did I win?

[suchmoon]

So what was the new name that he chose? Did I win?

We don't yet and we won't know until huge walls of text start spreading again in Meta.

[nutildah]

We don't yet and we won't know until huge walls of text start spreading again in Meta.

Of course we won't be able to prove that its him, just like we couldn't prove TOAA was cryptohunter, or that Craig Wright isn't Satoshi, or that the earth isn't flat, and other such common sense, easily discernible realities. Don't know how we live with ourselves.

[suchmoon]

There is a good chance that this is the new account: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2758665

I think we have a tie with these two guesses, so I'm awarding half a merit each, rounded up:

Anyway, if he does come back with another troll account my guess is that it'll be named "Inconvenient Truths, My Precious."

Anyway just for the fun of it: TheTruth

[OnaThibault]

I think it is Tigerdam

[DireWolfM14]

There is a good chance that this is the new account: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2758665

I think we have a tie with these two guesses, so I'm awarding half a merit each, rounded up:

Anyway, if he does come back with another troll account my guess is that it'll be named "Inconvenient Truths, My Precious."

Anyway just for the fun of it: TheTruth

I'm not so sure.  His language, vocabulary, and ability to adhere to a specific topic without going hyperbolic seem to indict a different pompous, wall-posting windbag.  The attempts to point the bloodhounds into CH's direction (and away form the one whom I suspect) seem quite calculated, in fact.

[nutildah]

I'm not so sure.  His language, vocabulary, and ability to adhere to a specific topic without going hyperbolic seem to indict a different pompous, wall-posting windbag.  The attempts to point the bloodhounds into CH's direction (and away form the one whom I suspect) seem quite calculated, in fact.

I'm sure. The sheer involvement of time they have already put into the account means its them. I feel the chance is greater its CH trying hard not to be CH but still failing, as opposed to someone is carefully emulating their comeback attempt. Don't understand why someone would try to be them: dramatically spraying diarrhea everywhere. I put them on ignore already.

[suchmoon]

I'm not so sure.  His language, vocabulary, and ability to adhere to a specific topic without going hyperbolic seem to indict a different pompous, wall-posting windbag.  The attempts to point the bloodhounds into CH's direction (and away form the one whom I suspect) seem quite calculated, in fact.

Do you think the real legend cryptohunter would let it slide if some impersonator was running around here?

[xtraelv]

truth or dare ?

[suchmoon]

truth or dare ?

Minus one merit for you for not reading the thread. This has been resolved weeks ago

Will update OP now.

[GazetaBitcoin]

The attempts to point the bloodhounds into CH's direction (and away form the one whom I suspect) seem quite calculated, in fact.

Do you think the real legend cryptohunter would let it slide if some impersonator was running around here?

Oh well, what about that:

Oh and one more thing: truth or dare never said (as far as I know) he is not CH / TOAA. However, even if he said or not, I observed something interesting, to say the least: he tends to quote full OPs / full replies, as TOAA used to.

I'm sure you'll find a great many more similarities if you pay attention. The question is are they deliberate or merely a sloppy disguise.

Would the real CH allow such act of lèse majesté 

This has been resolved weeks ago

Was it? The truth is out there.

[xtraelv]

truth or dare ?

Minus one merit for you for not reading the thread. This has been resolved weeks ago

Will update OP now.

I didn't see any  UNDENIABLE evidence that was BACKED by SEVERAL OBSERVABLE INSTANCES that this thread was marked as resolved.

[GazetaBitcoin]

Edit - the contest has ended

The topic needs to be resurrected, as truth or dare is inactive since March 10th, 2020. Arguably, the legacy was inherited by bonesjonesreturns, but this account is also offline since June 8th, 2020.

Any prognostic for the next account?

[suchmoon]

Any prognostic for the next account?

cryptohunter is back and he's in top shape: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2810185

[GazetaBitcoin]

I'm sorry, you should have guessed before he reappeared, not after lol. No merit for you this time!

[Mor254]

It is difficult to predict the name he will enter again, but it will definitely be close to his previous name cryptohunter. I expect the name to be btchunter.

[GazetaBitcoin]

...said Mor254 which, eagerly looking for the merit, not just he did not bother at all to read the previous 37 posts of the topic, but he didn't bother to read at least the last two posts lol. No merit for you either!

[suchmoon]

I'm sorry, you should have guessed before he reappeared, not after lol. No merit for you this time!

FML

This whole thing is a scam obviously. Please support type 3 flag against the OP.