Bitcoin Forum

1. Increase in the national GDP is least likely to be caused by a war.
2. Oil is considered the most crucial resource in modern warfare.
3. War affects the stock market by causing a decline in stock prices.

What do you guys think? Is this true or false?

1. Warfare represents a disruptive force that impacts all key components contributing to Gross Domestic Product: labor, capital, and land. The power supply was disrupted during the conflict in Ukraine, leading to significant disruptions in domestic production processes.

2. While oil may not be the most critical resource, there has been no viable substitute for its profound economic influence worldwide. It continues to wield substantial sway over a significant portion of the global economy.

I don't know what to say, but the least I can say is, that your statements are so obvious and there is no need to ask others to confirm them. Because we do have seen the above-mentioned scenarios due to the war between Russia with Ukraine. That war, has caused a great loss in GDP, Oil became expensive, stock market was also affected. And besides that, we have seen many other problems too.

The short answer is yes it is true.

Normally war is a bad thing and it affects all aspect of man's life and that of their nation why because when there is war there is also economy crisis and it surely also affects the areas of your highlights. When there is war the neighboring country's enjoy the benefits of selling their ammunition and their cost prices changes over time to the higher in demand of them, including every other things in the country increases tremendously. This isn't a thing to pray for and we should try all our best to prevent and avoid war from resolute within both country's as both affected country could finds it very difficult to get back their normal ways of living because it will affect almost every other thing in the country.

War will never increase the national GDP, it would rather decrease it and the level depends on the nature of the war and where it hit the country.

Crude oil prices would drop during war and crisis, a good example was the Covid-19 era when the price of WTI dropped to below $0. It was only saved on the future markets.

War will definitely cause uncertainty in the market, including stocks, and there would be an absence of precision but instability. So, it will surely be negative on the stocks.

Of course, war usually has a profound and lasting effect on any economy because it affects the overall economic stability of that country. Nothing will function well because of the impact the war has caused. war brings about inflation, trade disruption, currency devaluation, an increase in government spending, and lots of infrastructural and human damage, so many refugees and IDP camps to mention a few.
Oil plays a significant role in modern warfare due to its role in energy supply, logistics, and so on but there are other resources like information, food and water, mineral and material resources, economic and financial resources that also help in determining the outcome of a conflict.

War impacts the global economy only if the war involves major countries. People may forget that wars in the Middle East have been going on for years, much longer than the Ukraine war. And those wars in the Middle East haven't been disruptive because they involve countries with small GDP's.


In rare instances it can depending on investments made post war and depending on global competition.

After WW2, the U.S. GDP grew rather quickly and they made some gains in foreign exports because half of Europe was torn to rubble during the war. As Europe was rebuilding their economies, U.S. overtook everyone else and controlled global exports.

Without WW2, I don't see the U.S. economy growing as fast as it did from the 40's to the 60's.

The profit the war brings is less than the losses it causes. It depleted a country's resources; people lost their lives and homes; food shortages caused famine and the destruction of a country's economy. Ukraine, Libya, and Syria are some examples of what a war can do to a country's economy. But it has minimal impact on a global scale if all the major powers aren't involved. As an example, the Russia-Ukraine war causes food shortages in the Middle East, which causes an increase in food prices, but they are getting supplies from other sources, which prevents any possible famine. If this were a war, we could see half the population die because of famine.

You probably need to consider the location and type of war that is going on to determine if it will effect the global economy. A war in the middle of a desert without oil is probably just going to end up as skirmishes by possibly poorer country, will not have much consequence outside the local region - except for maybe a few more refugees trickling around and maybe things like a lower supply of diamonds, or other commodities if they mined it. On the edge of Europe, from two big countries, we're seeing some massive impact on supply chains and food security taking place right now. It is very unsettling when more developed countries, even those with nuclear weapons, start getting into unnecessary fights because you never know if something might trigger it to spiral out of all control.

Prices of everything will go up. There will be hunger, and I don't think you will live long as well, the war today is not like in ww2 where the weapons are just rifles and grenades. War today will include planes with warheads that can wipe out an entire city.  The stock market may be the last thing you will be thinking.

If you survive long enough, maybe you will still be seeing BTC going up but the problem is that products and food are hard to find. If you are able to buy the price most likely is up to the moon.

You forget the most important thing, the war brings a lot of deaths and unforeseen situations in life, like loss of family members, destruction of homes/buildings, loss of business and jobs etc. These are things which the common man faces and they would not care about the GDP, Oil or stock prices at that point of time.

Yes, the outside world (which is not involved in the war) will look closely at how the oil prices react to war, how the stock market will behave and how the crypto market shows bullish or bearish momentum during those times.

The impact exists, to a lesser or greater degree, for certain regions or hemispheres and within those zones, some countries suffer from it more than others.

THE UCR-RUS war is the best recent example, but it does not mean that the impact is the same, this war has had a brutal global impact but it has mainly and greatly affected the economies of Europe, that has been the epicenter, and within In that region, some countries are having a worse time, globalization is a somewhat "climatic" effect, in these parts other things affect us more than the direct economic effect produced by this pitiful war between Ukraine and Russia.

By the way, there are were relevant news these days since the president of Ukraine met with Baiden, that simple meeting has a very great effect for Europe and Asia, but less relevant for the American continent.(e.g.)

Well we are over a year from the war now, and so obviously, we have seen the effects already. Last year was bad as it really affected the whole global economy, but this year, it seems that every country has adjusted and settled down a bit and now fighting it's on war in inflation.

So maybe there will be more countries that are going to suffer due to war, but there could be some that has altered their outlook as far as the hardship of war and focus solely on how to improved everything thru their governments.

And it could be one reason though that Bitcoin will end up at 6 digits for then next bull run as there are a lot of people who might hedge their wealth and used Bitcoin as store of value.

This is obvious during warfare because the infrastructures are destroyed and companies are short down and affected so when there is no production, that will reduce every other activities around the company which will affect their IPO or stock selling. Wars are very devastating for every economic whether big or small, to avoid war is more profitable than to allow it to happen because it leads to different calamity and it destabilizes an economy and set them 100 years backward .

You’re right and the list keeps going. War is not a good thing and should not be encouraged. It is better to always end up in a truce than to escalate the matter into a war. War have destroyed many nations in the past and any country that have faced war before don’t always pray for it to happen again because of the everlasting and irreplaceable loss it always does to the people living in that vicinity or nation. An example is the war between the Russia and Ukraine which has not come to an end, another one is the internal war in Sudan that already claimed many lives and left properties. It is disheartening seeing all this happening in a supposedly said to be peaceful world.

It was common impact on the GDP of the country which involved in the war,because the import and export of the goods in that country was totally stopped due to the war.The demand of the oil was the cause of the US influences in the oil based countries like Iran,Syria.The United States had try to get the control of this oil based country by the war.But this country had try to defend themselves and some other country had helped the Iran and Iran was get away from the influences.After the war,their will be huge influence in the stock of that country.

In addition, war also caused the government to spend way more than its normal budget.  It also makes people suffer.  Transportation and logistic is also greatly affected so the distribution of trade is interrupted.  Continued war can result in famine, economic crash, destruction of properties and living things, and many more.  The only sectors that profit in this war are the weapon manufacturers and medical supplier.

Everything is being affected by the war. The price of commodities and as in everything has increased and that's due to the demand of oil that's also being used in war and the same goes to the affected areas where oil is being produced.

While there have been a lot of resources and sources of oil, you know that when there are events like this. They just make the prices balloon because they'll reason out it's because plainly of the war.

On for the affected land masses of the war, the decline of prices of the lands there are massively happening.

let us put it this way, war will always have significant impact in the economy especially those countries which are directly involved one way or another.
neighbouring countries as well. and those countries which are heavily relying on the products produced by those countries. and other countries which are not directly involved will also feel its impact as you said because most countries are still relying their oil resources outside of their region.

There are many crucial resources in modern warfare. Oil is an important resource, but there is also food and water as essential ones. Depending the region the war is affecting and the countries involved on the conflict we can have another crucial resources, like gas for Europe which comes from Russia. Every resources which are a must to keep economies running and living organisms alive are considered crucial.

I don't know but in my opinion if you can control energy you can control basically everything in this case of war Russia is also among top of producer oil and gas even tho they are bombarded by a ton of sanction the country still can manage their economy because they control the energy.

If top energy producer decide to cut or decrease their output the price will likely going up, you know basic supply and demand after that the other price will also start to rise because in our world today we are depends on the oil from producing the food to distribution the food all of them need an energy and the other will start to follow

I have read comments on this post and confirmed that economically, there were more additional lists to consider when talking about the impact of war on global economy. Regardless of how big or small the war, it is still us who will face and deal with the consequences. Though there are many reasons how a war has started but leaders should think the impact of war on it's economy and people.

War has produced many negative impacts, apart from the three impacts you described above, war also leaves deep wounds on the people who live around the war. The impact produced by war depends on how big the war is, countries that are energy dependent from countries that are being hit by war also experience negative impacts such as stray missiles and increasing inflation ratios.

The increase in national GDP is hampered, state spending is increasing to finance war needs such as the need for large amounts of oil and the stock market is not functioning as it should, which makes share prices fall further. Overall, the impact of the war has left many negative sides, leaving huge losses in economic terms and leaving deep trauma due to the increase in disability.

War has never brought any benefits to ordinary people like us, but for politicians, tycoons, and dictators, it is an effective tool to demonstrate strength and satisfied for their needs. That's why war will never disappear, war has existed for thousands of years and is still maintained today. That shows that there are still many people who want war to happen and that may be the way they achieve their goals. There are even countries that make money from arms trade, so they will find ways to create wars to promote their business activities.

I will not respond to the first point because I think it is still possible that the opposite of what you said is possible. But the second point is clearly possible because oil has long been a staple used by everyone in all conditions, including war. Whether it's oil for consumption by the public or oil used in vehicles and machines that run modern technology today, the third point could also be true because war can have a bad influence on stock prices and also prices of real estate assets around countries experiencing war.

That's why established countries that have a thriving economy try their best not to start wars or if they really have to commit proxy wars in different countries like what USA does which makes for a healthy profit for their weapon development sector and so they can justify their military budget/spending. If we're talking about global economy, the effect should depend on the range of the devastation of the war because there are wars happening in Africa right now albeit bloody, it doesn't really affect the global economy as the devastation isn't that widespread, unlike with Russia and Ukraine, there are active sanctions placed on Russia which could be problematic but they're not as influential in global market so oil and airspace is the most likely commodity that's affected although Europe will be feeling uneasy right now which could be a sign of a shaky European economy.

1- A very tricky question. Let me explain.
For example, for the United States or Germany, no matter how cynical it sounds, the military-industrial complex now forms GDP. This is the money that arms manufacturers receive for government contracts. As a result, this is business development, the salaries of tens of thousands of employees of military-industrial complex companies, and hundreds of thousands of third-party suppliers.
But for the Russian Federation, it is ruin. The fact is that they are essentially burning money. Yeah, yeah. Although they write down the "turnover" of the military-industrial complex in their GDP, but in fact, in weeks or months it all turns into burned-out junk that has not brought any income to the economy. Turnover has been created, income has not. By the way, for 2024, the decrepit economy of the international terrorist country has OFFICIALLY increased the OPEN part of the budget for the military-industrial complex and now every third ruble from the budget will be burned to satisfy the painful complexes of the Kremlin's pathetic semblance of the Fuhrer....

2. Oil has indeed, this time, become one of the factors of economic terror, just like gas. BUT... It turned out that it was not critical. First of all, the degenerating economy of the terrorist country needs at least some money, and it sells oil for pennies, which is then processed by third parties (and they earn the bulk of the oil), but there was no crisis. Given the trend of global migration to renewable energy sources, the role of oil will be steadily decreasing.
I would now recommend to pay more attention to the resource - fresh water. It will become more and more in demand every year. 
And I can predict that very soon, the largest reservoir, Lake Baikal, will come under Chinese control, along with the historical territories of China.

The people will experience the impact of war. Countries affected by war will experience economic shocks, which may be even greater if the war is not over. Maybe it is not only the economy that will be affected but other sectors because if the war lasts for a long time, the impact will soon spread.

Leaders do have to think about the impact of this war, but if they are still more concerned with it, it seems their people have to be patient and try to survive. But the real impact of the war will probably be felt for longer even though the war is over, especially as there are still many victims of the war who have not been able to forget the consequences of the war.

For number two, maybe an explanation from Investopedia can answer it. At least, that's what I caught from what was explained on the site. This is also related to number three. But I am sorry if that is wrong.

The negative impact of war can be very disasterous if we are not careful enough. It can lead to depopulation and lose of properties causing the level of poverty to increase drastically. The war in Ukraine has cause many people to leave there environment and seek for refuge in other regions that will alleviate there circumstances and create room for opportunity.

 The past wars the world had experience like the world war one and two had so much effect on the climate change and destruction of our environment. We need to try everything posible to prevent war of conflict because it is very dangerous and can cause more damages than good.

War definitely has huge impact in economy, things that are definitely happened is the stop of production, in the region or area where the war happening there won't be any production, and the price of the product that made in this area will surging, the recent example is the increasing of wheat because of the Ukraine war. This is will definitely have a negative impact in the economy.

There are two sides to every coin. This also applies to everything that exists in this world. There are good and there are bad. Same thing with wars. Some are facing the harsh reality while others are taking advantage of that situation. So the impact could be different from each perspective.

Those who are involved in the war will be in chaos and those who are not will be searching for opportunities to take advantage of this situation. For example, imagine you need oil, and the major country providing it is involved in the war (same as Russia). They cut off supplies. The other minor countries that have oil supplies will increase prices for oil. That way they are taking advantage. This is good for them. But it is bad for other countries.

This is just an example. And things like this happen. So what I am trying to say is, that the impacts are not limited to only bad things, there are good impacts too. And the good and bad will switch places based on which perspective you look at it from.

Some nations like USA live for war, they have to have war every few years, and send their troops and all their shiny new gadgets to other nations to attack, otherwise they are not going to sustain. This is a nation with no danger on their country at all, nobody is attacking them and haven't in centuries, and yet they are spending a trillion dollars per year on military, and they keep suggesting that they have to otherwise something bad may happen the moment they stop, and in order to justify that they have to attack somewhere. Outside of that, no other nation would profit from war, there is no reason for war neither, but obviously humanity is not like that at all, for some reason we keep attacking each other constantly.

The US Army has left Afghanistan. The US Army does not want to participate in the conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh. I think that Americans are not able to control all military conflicts due to their problems in the economy.
But the American army does not fight on its territory, and therefore does not harm the economy of its country.

Ehh it depends on what country you are inside the war.  I would say that some countries GDP's increase due to helping out with wars, but for those that are fighting in the war, I'm not so sure that's the case. 

I wouldn't say oil is the most crucial resource, just look at the Ukraine Russia war right now.  What is everyone sending Ukraine, not oil but guns, munitions etc.   Those are much more valuable during war.

Lastly yes war puts a damper on the entire world economy, especially when you've got two larger countries like Ukraine and Russia fighting.

Ware fucking sucks, any way you look at it, and I'm sick of it! Let's all get along!!

I think there's a difference between a war just being out there and affecting your country indirectly and your country being actually at war with another country (or in a civil war situation, which is also a separate thing). So on #1, if it's your country that's at war, I agree with the statement. But if your country isn't directly affected by the violence and destruction of the war, then your country may experience an increase of GDP by producing and selling stuff that's suddenly at high demand (weapons).
As for #2, I think it really depends on what you consider a resource because there's a human resource, a time resource, material resources etc. Oil can be very important for heavy vehicles and aviation, but those vehicles and aviation are also resources, and they're also crucial.
#3 can be true if your country's at war or when a war is big enough to affect the global market, but sometimes it can be irrelevant.

This depends on what your country produces, if it produces oil and weapons, your country will be very profitable in this case, because we have seen clear evidence that this industry has an increase in demand and prices become high in war situations.

Every military activity requires energy resources to move from one area to another, and they need oil as the main fuel currently to carry out military vehicle operations.

That is certain, the business sector in a country that is at war, all activities will certainly be dangerous and companies will certainly experience losses due to war which will make them unable to operate, especially if their business focuses on exports and imports, when sending goods through areas of military tension, Of course they stopped doing that which made the shares plummet, but it's a different story if it's shares in oil or other energy companies, you will get profits if you own a lot of shares in oil mining companies.

Yes, it is absolutely certain that the war between the two countries will affect the entire world.  The war between Russia and Ukraine is affecting the whole world. I understand that this is bringing bad things to the whole world. Because of this war, the price of oil is increasing in the world market.  Everywhere everything's areincreasing, commodity prices have increased in many countries. It is affecting everything.  It seems that the impact is much greater in developing countries. Also, if we look at the history of World War one and two, we can see that they shook the whole world.

Ofc there are a lot of effects of wards, from micro to macro economically. It is more than just the economy, being in war is being all.

Yeah. Unfortunately, people faces the consequences of war and it doesn't bring any pro of being in war. Historically, war restarted the global economy, especially when it happened on two vital playing countries like USA, Russia, and European countries. Leaders won't have that time to think about the impact it will give as they do it for the pride of the country, it's all or nothing after all.

War is an evil. But there are also beneficiaries of this evil - the military-industrial complex, military programs. War brings great suffering to some, and great money and justification for their incompetent rule to others. In one fantastic story it was told that the inhabitants of one state were given the right to manage their own taxes. As a result, nothing was spent on military expenditures and peace prevailed on Earth.

While those countries are suffering and heavily affected by the war. There's also the opposite impact from those countries that are manufacturers of arms, weapons and ammos.

The sad truth from these oil producing companies, they're not just going to be bumped just because of the actual. When there are trade wars that don't have casualties but us in how we're consuming things.

That's how we're also impacted by them if ever they do such economic moves that will have a great and certain impact for the lives of many.

Despite their destructive capacity and catastrophic consequences for the state in which they are an arena, wars have other, undeclared aspects. Unfortunately, there are always parties that benefit from wars in different forms, and therefore wars have impacts on many economies since the interests are intertwined:
- Arms manufacturing companies that will sell weapons to the conflicting parties.
- Construction companies that will receive reconstruction contracts.
- Banks that will finance the conflicting parties in the form of high-interest loans.
- ...
Wars create chaos, causing the collapse of the internal economy of the region in which they take place. There are those who appear after wars, called war rich or crisis merchants, who accumulate wealth through smuggling various types of goods at the borders.

Countries don't understand the ramifications that war brings, and if you study history closely, you will actually see the ramifications of does action. However, governments of countries don't take this into consideration, despite the fact that you can see many people reacting negatively to the effects of war in the news. There is no way that a war won't have an impact on the countries that surround it. Anybody will become weak even from seeing movies like We Were Soldiers Alone and what Happened. And both governments will need to spend a lot of money, which will have an impact on the economy, in order to establish stability. It's better to prevent these impacts, some of which even result in homelessness for certain people. Is just best avioded.

Currently there are several countries at war, but why is it only the Ukraine vs Russia war that affects the world economy, that's because not all wars affect the global economy, only wars between large and influential countries will affect the global economy.

I still really remember when the war between Ukraine vs Russia was in high tension, the concerns of all countries about oil and gas supplies reached an alarming level, speculative activities continued to occur, even predictions of the global economy collapsing also continued to grow, luckily until now we haven't experienced that much. The impact of the war between the two countries was severe, but war is still not a good thing, it only hurts all parties.

Wars are a very distressing thing and it’s very disheartening when it becomes the case but, it’s effect is not always on the parties or victims on war alone. Like you’ve referenced a global impact in OP and the topic contains, war actually affects on a broader scale.
The world is more connected than we see it and that’s why, we’ve got nations in trades with themselves over the availability of resources and how to harness it beneficially for the rest of the world.
War actually comes in between all that and makes trades in this manner amongst nations impossible or not without some major difficulty which in turns affects the economy of a people and thus, the world.

Hence, in terms of having to restore peace in a state, it’s got to be a case for everyone to preach peace and hope peace is returned to every state at war.

You have just summarised the OP unintentionally. Everything is affected by war. I haven't witnessed a full blown up war in my country but I have watched in the television. I have also read in the news and also been told by friends in the affected countries.  Tbh, if it is possible, war needs to be avoided by all means. Op hurriedly listed a few things that are affected by war, but I might decide to elaborate but let me just categorise the effects of war in the economy.

• Internal disruption 
• External effects
• Natural disruption

In the internal, only the countries at war will suffer as there will be no good food and freedom of movement by the citizens.
In the External, you will understand that neighbouring countries and other countries that depends on the affected country for trades and other international relations will suffer. While the natural effects talks about the environment disorder which affects even the nature and animals. If possible, leave peaceably with all men and shun war.

At the beginning days, the impact of war between the two countries were felt much all around the world. Over time things started to change as countries started to look for the alternate sources to keep things functioning in an orderly manner. The major reason being the oil supply cut which directly affects the increase in price of each an everything. Next thing is the food supply, Russia and Ukraine being the global contributors in wheat supply stopped it. Above all is the loss of human lives and the situation to lead the life amidst the fear. Global economy experienced hard downturn by covid-19 and the war had made situation even worse.

I think war always bring bad impact to the world economy. imagine this, build a building from destructed building is more expensive rather than build a building on empty land. war will make the cost for development increase a lot, it will really slow the progress and as human we maybe don't have enough power or resource to anticipate bad things from nature that maybe come in the future.

Generally this is true, but this is only felt by countries that are at war because the destruction you are referring to only occurs in certain areas and not globally. But if we look at the negative impacts that can spread globally, there are also high prices for basic necessities or raw materials that have not been processed and the difficulty of having access to countries that are at war to make marketing there, so this has become a very basic obstacle.

Apart from that, if several countries are facing war and usually these countries very often produce natural resources in large quantities and the results of these natural resources are raw materials for making certain products which are often needed by all communities, this will also have an impact. which is even worse. Namely an increase in the price of raw materials to two or three times the usual because when raw materials or natural resources become scarce, the price will continue to soar and companies that often buy these raw materials will also find it difficult to produce more.

As you mentioned, oil will be in high demand for fueling warfare, and stock prices will experience extreme volatility as a result. The consequences of war indeed lead to substantial losses.

However, as you pointed out in the second point, if the demand for oil increases, it implies that energy-related stock prices will also rise. Furthermore, defense-related stocks will naturally surge in value because many countries require them. Savvy investors will be wise to safeguard their assets during the crash that may occur during a world war.

There is no doubt that war has a very bad effect on the world economy.The economy of poor countries is badly damaged by war.Due to the bad effects of war, the growth rate of national GDP decreases and some countries' GDP even goes into the negative.It is obvious that if there is a war, the rate of your national production will decrease.

War is also likely to cause food shortages, which in turn increases the prices of all things.It is true that oil will be considered the most important resource in modern warfare because the countries that have more oil production can stop or increase oil production.Just as in the war between Russia and Ukraine, Russia threatened to reduce or cut off gas supplies to European countries, due to which gas prices in European countries have increased significantly.


As soon as there is news of war anywhere in the world, it has a very bad effect on the stock market.Most of the countries' stock markets fall and all investors are at risk of losing their money. Of course, war is dangerous for the stock market.I think the neighboring countries of this country will be very badly affected in case of war.Because refugees from war-torn areas are often forced to seek refuge in neighboring countries, which is likely to increase the burden on the economy of these countries.

I prefer 2 and 3 as the greatest effects of war on the global economy. In wars, oil becomes the first target because the war machine depletes fuel and the demand for fuel becomes very large. Also, due to the poor security conditions, transportation and transportation methods become very dangerous and expensive, and this leads to a crisis. Great global due to the rise in fuel as we witnessed in the Russia-Ukraine war.

Wars also affect the stock market and cause stock prices to fall due to the fears raised by wars. Fears arise among most people, especially large investors, and they may resort to selling stocks and buying valuable assets such as gold and perhaps Bitcoin.

The impact of the war has added alarming pressure to inflation in the world economy natural gas prices are increasing rapidly. Global stocks and indices continue to fall along with that gold and aluminum prices have also started to increase. Russia's aggression has started to affect the global market from wheat to fuel prices. Restlessness is appearing in other sectors of the economy as well the Western business institutions began to suffer of the war but the economy of developed countries has gone through the crisis but there is no exaggerated negative propaganda. The price of food grains imported and exported through this route is increasing due to the attack on Ukraine. Due to the corona epidemic the purchasing power of people in many parts of the world has already decreased if the price of food increases again it will increase the crisis.

it feels right. The second point is the most important I think. I saw that during the war between Russia and Ukraine. I think oil is very important. but not just those 3 points. I think electricity and food will of course increase. that was because of the difficulty in trading in the middle of a warring city. it should just be a stock for emergency supplies.

Internal conflicts with insurgents even have a huge impact in a country's economy how much more when we are going to talk about global one. Those lists could be partial because I know each and everyone of us has opinions regarding impacts of war on global economy. Though my lists are common but still counts as valid impacts. Aye?! 😁

I didn't noticed that.

We're fortunate that we've never experienced the whole and worst impact of that war physically but with the effect of it globally, we're all affected.

As much as we want to end these wars and avoid them at all cost, we don't know what's on the mind of the world leaders. Maybe those conspiracy theories are right about them, it's all about money and arm sales.

I think there is nobody that benefits from war, that is why Winston Churchill said, "it's better to jaw-jaw than to war-war".
First, war shrinks the economy of the waring countries, because manufacturing, production and supplying will be brought to a halt, thereby affecting the growth of GDP of the countries involved.

Importation of finished product to the international market will be grounded totally,  because international flights might be restricted from those countries at war.
So if the countries at war, are well known crude oil producing countries, you will notice that, there will be shortage of supply of crude oil to the international market, thereby affecting the global economy.

Obviously, the impact of the wars in other nations is obvious; it is not simply oil that is being hiked. Almost all of the commodities required by ordinary people like ourselves have been produced. Almost every country is affected.

Right here in our country, our economy is recovering like a turtle, but it is still accompanied by inflation, which is the cause of the rise in prime commodities in our lives. The number of unemployed persons is also on the rise.

Of course, the impact of war if the war does not stop, then the country could experience a recession due to a decrease in GDP. The impact of war will also cause economic depression ranging from unemployment, crime, to food crises. If we look at the war between Russia and Ukraine. The war that occurred between Russia and Ukraine not only had an impact on the national economy and taxation, but also had an impact on countries in the world. Apart from that, of course the war between these two countries also had an impact on increasing world oil prices. Because so far Russia is the second largest oil producing country after America. With this war, of course oil production in Russia experienced obstacles, thus affecting the flow of oil exports, including to other countries. This will also have an impact on import taxes and VAT.

But what actually had the most impact apart from what you mentioned above was the very sad situation, lots of blood flowing, building debris and all the bad things resulting from the war that was there. Many innocent people become victims, especially women and children. Families must be separated. Children and women fled. I find it hard to imagine how they feel. It could be said that war is a human tragedy.

While food prices are falling around the world, food prices in the country I live in have increased more than ever before. Both global economic problems and wrong policies of the state caused inflation to increase more than normal.

The negativities brought about by Russia-Ukraine and Corona also brought the economy to this state. In general, I do not think that the recovery phase has been reached. There is just a recession.

That's a dubious thought. And I'll explain why. War is a very expensive and costly endeavor. Yes, the US military-industrial complex makes good money, and that is if it is a participant in the war. But the budget of the country incurs huge costs. War is a very expensive "pleasure". And its goal should be such that it pays off these costs. I honestly don't remember in the last 100 years that the US started a war and then seized someone's territory and resources. You must be confused with Russia, which has phantom fantasies of "empire" and "greatness", which for 20 years has been trying, and partially succeeding, to seize other people's lands and resources, and putting the inhabitants of the occupied territories into a slave existence.
U.S. participation, for example, in helping Ukraine against the terrorist war unleashed by Russia, is a CONsequence of Russian aggression. Moreover, it is very late.
But maybe I don't know examples that you can give to explain your IDEA ? I will be glad to familiarize myself with these facts !

This could be the case if war occurs, it is heartbreaking, both the economy, food and finances will suffer, considering that wars sometimes occur, of course it is possible that access to supplies and food will decline, if the loss of building materials, public facilities and those covering the area after the war will be felt. the expenses. The war that follows will certainly swell the budget if it has to be repaired and rebuilt if it is razed to the ground. The war has a lot to do with the survival of society.

The war was very detrimental to both sides. But when a country wins a war or becomes an aggressor it will be quite profitable from a geopolitical perspective. For example, they can give a warning to other countries, and make the attacked country have to surrender and sign some peace treaty. The prolonged conflict between Russia and Ukraine also has an impact on the world. There will be many parties who interfere, causing imbalances in various vital areas in the world, such as the food crisis, energy limitations and world inflation.

War is one thing that can disturb the economic position of a country. When a war breaks out in a country, it affects the nation in many ways, and that nation suffers the most. War is never a good sign, especially when the economic position of the country is different and the country suffers from absolute poverty. And when an economic crisis occurs in a country due to war, people suffer the most, everything from their food to their products is affected. Moreover, the stock price fall causes that problem to appear in the market and everywhere affected by it should not be fought but prevented. Moreover, oil is another important resource of a country without which a country can become immobilized. That is why, of all the countries that avoided the war, we saw that the Ukraine war suffered a lot in the nation where the power supply was disrupted. So when war starts in any country of the world, those countries are the most affected economically.

In short, there's no one getting any benefits after the war except for those people that sell firearms, weapons, and those wealthy people that likes to hide in the shadow. While the majority of people always suffer due to the damages because of wars that leads to poverty, malnutrition, different kind of diseases, and so many more.

I don't really know what's the motive of war, I mean what are you gonna do with so much money profiting from a war if the world you're living in was destroyed already and full of toxic chemicals from nuclear bombs.

Definitely, war makes a mess of everything. When nations are destroyed and economies collapse, regular people suffer the most. It's a terrible situation. Everything is in disarray: people, their families, their means of livelihood. You're right that the war in Ukraine was a catastrophe for the country. After losing power, everything began to fall apart. It's a horror show. And the economy? The stock market drops, and I won't even mention the state of the oil market or other commodities. In the midst of this terrible confusion, nothing makes sense. It's a sobering reminder of why war should never be the first option. Because at the end of the day, it’s the ordinary people who pay the price

If the war is between two major countries, it will impact the global economy. Let's take Russia-Ukrain war. This has hugely impacted the World. Commodities prices are increasing, and so does the inflation. Global oil supply is significantly reduced after sanctions on Russia. Natural Gas prices are also increasing. Many countries are going into recession. Economies are shrinking.  
On the other hand, small-scale wars in the Middle East or Africa are not impacting the global economy. It is impacting the countries that are at war with each other.

We will not really benefit from any war that takes place in another country, but it will even cause harm to the countries that are close to it, especially if the country involved in the war is one of those that export products to us that are also benefited by our country.

Now, the question is: why is there a war? That is because of the conquest that a leader makes in a country, which actually leads to fighting when they do not give each other the territory that they both claim. And besides that, the war will actually happen because it is also in the prophecy that cannot be stopped.

War not only causes damage to the parties involved but also affects the whole world because we are a chain and if one link is broken, it will cause serious chain consequences. Just like the war between Russia and Ukraine, it not only has a negative impact on the two countries but also directly affects us, low-income people in third world countries. Inflation and the energy crisis will lead to crises in every aspect of our lives. War is truly cruel and the consequences are enormous.

That's true, due to war b/w these two big countries many countries affected because Russia is third big supplier of oil and at the time of war those countries who was buying from Russian demnaded from other countries and famous economics law 'law of demand " applied which has direct impact on the price. unfortunately our inflation rate in our country rised so much because of this war.

Afghanistan war also affected our country as million of afghan civilians affected and migrated to our country. The major problem of food, place, service and peace force them to do so.  The money US wasted in war was more than trillion and this money could be used for health , education and other devolping works. These war are still not big but If conflict happen between any two  atomic power countries with use of atom bomb then all near countries will be badly affected and biggest economics crisis will happen.

Actually, the effect of two countries fighting for all countries around the world is not really good. If those countries that are far away from the country that is at war are feeling the bad effects of it, how about the countries that are close to the warring country itself?

This country of ours is far from Russia, but we can feel its effect on the increase in fuel and other things we buy here. Because Russia exports other things to our country.

War has a great impact on the economy because desire for resources increases but due to war one cannot get it easily. Trading mechanism in both countries will be cease due to war therefore neither they can export their materials to other countries nor they can demand from other countries for their needed materials.

Oil and gas which is also known as energy become more higher in worth therefore if it become elevated in price then related materials also boost in value. Sometimes people migrate from those countries where situations of war arises because everyone wants to live a better life and where they can find numerous job opportunities as country having war will not avail job opportunities for individual and everything will be effected a lot.

So far the war as of now has yet not arrived in a military showdown. But because we are still in an economic war, it is a slow suffering and sanctions are affecting those countries with no resources while oil countries are dumping USD.

Once the war in Russia-Ukraine spills out, those allies are going to launch their weapons, it will be destruction and I hope someone with a clear mind will prevent it from happening because seriously, even the POPE who of all people will think of peace was calling for more weapons to be sent to Ukraine. For Christ sake, this POPE needs to be sent to Ukraine to see for himself.

The war between Russia and Ukraine not only had an economic impact, but also a physical impact and of course claimed the lives of hundreds of thousands of people and destroyed many cities so that more than eight million Ukrainians had to flee and spread to other European countries.

In fact, many countries depend on Russia and Ukraine. Their continued war will result in the weakening of the economies of countries that depend on each other. But on the other hand, Europe was the cause of the global economic crisis, not because of the war. because Europe and the West are blocking all basic interests to stop Russia. So it's their own fault because the West sanctions all goods from Europe and shuts down all goods from Russia.

of course it was greatly affected. I think it's a good idea not to trade shares when a country is at war. I'm sure goods, even food necessities, will become scarce, so I wonder why they trade while their country goes to war. I hope they pay more attention to their own condition.

Those allies of Ukraine have already made it their weapon testing ground. We have seen how the USA is providing all the latest military equipment from their arsenal. Both countries are suffering because of this war, but Russia is taking more heavy damage than Ukraine. Their economy was already weak, and now this war is eating their resources as well. It will make them weaker than ever, and even China and Iran will look stronger than them. If somehow they win this war, they will not have the might to keep their influence over their occupied territory for long.

If we consider the global impact of the terrorist war that russia unleashed against Ukraine, the world has realized that the deep cooperation and dependence on which the world economy was built before 2014 is a very risky business. More precisely, it is the admission of participants with dubious reputations and painful fantasies into this "fine-tuned mechanism". I hope this will be a good, albeit very expensive lesson, but as a result the world economy will be restructured in such a way that in the future the idiocy of one country will not globally affect the global world economy.

Ukraine occupies a very favorable geographical position with a good climate and fertile lands. In the Ukrainian Carpathians there is a sign marking the center of Europe. If you don’t count Russia, then Ukraine is the largest state in Europe. It covers an area of over 603 thousand square kilometers. It is followed by France with 547 thousand and Spain with 498 thousand square kilometers. At the same time, Ukraine is a kind of buffer between the democratic countries of Europe and authoritarian Russia, which wages constant wars both with its neighbors and throughout the world. Therefore, it is very important for European countries that Ukraine does not fall under the influence of Russia, because the existing balance of power will be disrupted and the threat to the rest of Europe will increase. This is one of the reasons why European countries provide all possible assistance in the war against Russia that attacked it.

Putin attacked Ukraine because he cannot tolerate a democratic state near his borders. This is a bad example for his empire, which is territorially based on force of arms and coercion. In addition, he wants to appropriate the history of Ukraine and turn it into his own history of the Russian Federation. Although Russians are called Russians, they are not the same thing. Russia as a state arose under Tsar Peter the Great at the turn of the 17th-18th centuries, while the state of Kievan Rus with the center of the capital of present-day Ukraine, Kiev, was one of the most powerful states in Europe back in the 9th century, and present-day Moscow, being then still a small village , was owned by the Kiev prince Yuri Dolgoruky. Therefore, before the reign of Peter the Great, Russians were called Muscovites, and the state itself was called Muscovy, but not Russians at all, since they had nothing to do with Rus', Kievan Rus. Now Russia is laying claim to the lands of Ukraine, although it is Ukraine that has the right to claim its historical lands, right up to Moscow.

You know, honestly, it just crossed my mind that the question is: have you heard of a war that has benefited all countries around the world? Have you read or watched any news like that? Even on Google, can you find anything? There is nothing, because the war brings destruction to every country, destruction from the economy number one, then importing and exporting will also be destroyed, so all countries around the world are affected.

So, as much as possible, we don't want a war with every country that is fighting. Because we citizens are the first to be affected by this, the rich people will not feel that much, unlike us ordinary citizens who are not rich. Millions of people around the world are affected just because of misunderstandings between two leaders of the country.

Of course, war is not intended to benefit all the countries around the world. It benefits the victor most of the time. And as you said, the rich people are the least likely to be affected if not benefitting from it. At least nowadays most countries are democratic unlike in the past when most were ruled by kings where the main goal was the kingdom first before the people. It's like North Korea which is led by the Kim family. They prefer to prioritize the budget for arms and weapons while the majority of its people suffer from malnutrition.

When war does not benefit any country, but the countries that are fighting the war are likely to cause more destruction, and this has often been the case. Then why these countries prefer to fight war despite being aware of the worst effects of war. I do not think that war can benefit any victor because destruction on both sides is assured.

The countries which have progressed and laid a network of roads and built big buildings in their country, all of them become a pile of ashes in a few days during the war. People have to face severe hardships and problems arise for both the rich and the poor. Fighting and profiting may be personal satisfaction for one person, but it can never be beneficial for a country and its people.

If war brings no benefits then why does war always happen? Although even the winning country will have losses, the spoils they gain are not small, so war is not completely useless to some people. Another thing is that we are ignoring countries that are not directly involved in the war but are benefiting a lot by selling weapons and lending money to the warring parties. They are people who lose almost nothing but gain huge profits. They are even the ones who create those wars, because they are the ones who get rich from selling weapons.

I even believe that it is the people who traffic in weapons and guns who always seek to cause conflicts and create wars between countries. Because as you said, they are the ones who benefit the most when war happens.

Yes, the earth is becoming worse and worse due to human destruction. But those greedy people will not think much about humanity and they will only try to satisfy their greed in the short term without caring about the long-term consequences. Some people's passion for power and ambition to dominate and control the world is pushing humanity toward destruction, but they will never realize it until it happens.

Judging by the press reviews - the world economy is getting back to a better state, this applies to the US and EU as well. As for the pariah countries and the world terrorist - everything is the same there, only in reverse :)

Russia, playing "god" missed the point of no return, when it was necessary to make a decision and try to get out of the situation somehow "well". But... idiocy took over. Now, in addition to the fact that Russia has no good solutions on the horizon, so it with its idiocy, rallied and "restarted" the Western alliance, NATO. Which, first of all, has created problems for the... China ! Now China has a "bouquet of problems" - growing economic problems due to the destruction of ties with the West, the realization that there will be no soft measures towards China.

I guess people saying that war has totally no benefit have little knowledge about history. War has been part of the human civilization. Be it power, territorial, race, religious, and influence. The Russian invasion of Ukraine for example has huge benefits if successful. It's just that the Russians did not expect the war to continue this long. Nonetheless, it is still holding Ukrainian territories especially the Crimean peninsula which is a very strategic location in the Black Sea. The effects may not be reflected right away since there are human, structures, and financial losses but in the long term, it is mostly worth it. Just like when the Americans risked and declared war on the Mexicans.

I guess people saying that war has totally no benefit have little knowledge about history. War has been part of the human civilization. Be it power, territorial, race, religious, and influence. The Russian invasion of Ukraine for example has huge benefits if successful. It's just that the Russians did not expect the war to continue this long. Nonetheless, it is still holding Ukrainian territories especially the Crimean peninsula which is a very strategic location in the Black Sea. The effects may not be reflected right away since there are human, structures, and financial losses but in the long term, it is mostly worth it. Just like when the Americans risked and declared war on the Mexicans.
[/quote]

Russia has no benefits. More precisely, if the whole world once again turned a blind eye to Russian terrorism, then yes, there would be benefits.

But now Russia is “going to the bottom”, bombarding the Armed Forces of Ukraine with “meat assaults”, having already destroyed more than 50% of its “second army of the world”, its economy, demography, financial system, and having forever lost its partnership with an adequate world.

Crimea does not have any strategic significance - the Black Sea is a closed water area, the entry into which is controlled by a NATO member country, and the entire route “to the world” is also blocked by NATO countries. The only purpose of Crimea is the mental masturbation of the Kremlin Fuhrer, and a convenient place for continuing terrorist attacks on Ukraine.

After Russia's defeat, it will not be saved; there will be no Marshall Plans for it. It will become the world's "bottom" for decades and will pay reparations to all countries that previously suffered from it.

The "profit" is different from not being needed. I agree that war has no profit for humanity right now, it is not a profit to gain a land, maybe it is for the government because they could go around saying that they attacked and got the nation another piece of land, and back in the day that was the case but today even that is not valid.

Many Russians literally fled out of Russia not to be part of the army to go attack Ukraine because they do not really want that land, they do not care about that land, only Putin and his people do. And not like you can tell Putin to stop, hell Wagner leader literally tried that and he murdered a mercenary units leader. Imagine being so powerful that you kill someone who has his own personal army. That's why this isn't any profitable to anyone ever, it is the most useless war we have seen in a long time.

Of course, in war there are definitely those who gain and there are also those who suffer losses, but generally the impact of war is loss. The only ones who benefit are countries that sell weapons. What is certain is that the impact of the War only produces sadness, misery, loss and fear. Heroes only exist for winners, and fortune only exists for rulers. War will also bring various kinds of psychological trauma, even because killing often becomes a habit that is difficult to break.

Example of war between Russia and Ukraine, In a war situation!! which is prolonged is a waste of costs in all sectors (life/destruction of buildings and ecosystems/all expensive war equipment and mental health). Both Ukraine and Russia are spending war funds that are no joke.

Greed is the reason why we have war today and selfish interest. When a war start, each party always think they will win but when it get deep and deep, one suffer more casualties than the other but eventually, the two of them most lost one or two things along the line, it's even possible that what they plan to achieve in the beginning may not go as expected, this is why war is not good for everyone.

Politics are the major cause of this and we must avoid the games they play, when the war succeed as they plan, it's always in their own favor and when it doesn't they don't have neither family that fight the war, it's always other less privileged families that do the job and die. We must be United for all and defend humanity everyday everytime.

The key problem is that these "many people who fled" are not against the war, they just don't want to die. But most people in russia support the kremlin's imperial ambitions, and support the murder of Ukrainians, and the kremlin's goal is to DESTROY Ukraine as an independent state that rebelled in 2014, against a totalitarian and criminal ruler and government similar to the kremlin regime

My question is why are you still here? Why are you not fighting against Russia in the east? Your country needs you, you have to enroll with the AFU and leave ASAP!  ;D


Forget about Crimea. It is no longer Ukrainian and will never be one. Russia has annexed it and according to their laws it's their territory, which essentially means that Russia has a right to use nuclear weapons in case there is an assault on Crimea. It's all over, let go.


Last time I checked, it was Ukraine trying to attack heavily fortified Russian defences with Western tanks (Leopard, Challenger) and APCs but as they quickly ran out of armor they are now sending their troops to attack Russian strongholds and minefields. And you're talking about "meat assaults" bro?  ;D ;D ;D 

By NATO member you mean Turkey right? Turkey reminds me of a prostitute, who is doing only what is profitable for her. They are signing all kinds of agreements and deals with anyone including Russia. They are afraid of losing Russian tourists and Russian gas and oil as it will finish off their struggling economy.

Remember, you can't defeat a Global nuclear superpower. You are completely delusional and your claims are hilarious.

I'd love to see the US paying reparations "to all countries that previously suffered from it" that would be expensive  ;D

I wonder what is the basis for your assertion that it is impossible to defeat a nuclear power, which, as follows from the text, means Russia? Everything happens for the first time. Until the recent attack by the Ukrainian Armed Forces on the port of Russian-occupied Sevastopol, there had never been a case of a missile hitting a submarine. Ukraine has successfully opened such an account.

Do you mean that Russia, with a military defeat from Ukraine, will begin to bomb Ukraine with nuclear strikes or even the whole world? Firstly, Ukraine does not yet intend to seize Russian territory within its internationally recognized borders. That is, Ukraine is not going to attack Russia, but is only defending its independence and territorial integrity. Whatever the outcome, it should be clear to sensible Russians that in this war Russia is attacking, not defending, and therefore the need to use nuclear weapons on a neighboring country, receive nuclear contamination from their own bombs and die from it is completely absurd.

  Secondly, in order to use nuclear weapons, in Russia the president must transmit a code signal to unlock nuclear weapons and thereby authorize their use. This signal is transmitted through a portable nuclear briefcase control system. The Minister of Defense and the Chief of the General Staff have the same devices. The actual possibility of a nuclear strike is feasible if permission comes from all three devices. Then the signal goes to a special service of the General Staff, which, in turn, transmits the order to the specific command in whose location the nuclear forces are located. After this - from the command to the specific officer responsible for the actual launch. In addition, the president is always accompanied by a group of General Staff officers responsible for the “nuclear briefcase.” The chain is long enough, so it seems to be foolproof. On the other hand, if this fool nevertheless decides to use nuclear weapons, will all the military in this chain want to carry out this criminal order and expose themselves, their relatives, loved ones, and so on to the danger of destruction?

As for non-strategic (tactical) nuclear weapons, the chain is even longer. The troops do not have tactical warheads. It must be picked up from a centralized storage warehouse, transported, media prepared, loaded, and military training conducted. It's a long chain, and at every step there may be doubts about whether we really want it. In addition, all this is tracked. US and NATO intelligence will quickly discover this, and NATO has developed, in case of such a danger of using nuclear weapons, a preventive non-nuclear strike, as a result of which any such state will cease to exist within thirty minutes.

  Now some states are simply afraid that as a result of long-term military failures in Ukraine, a wave of protests and centrifugal influences may rise in Russia itself, which in turn could lead to the disintegration of Russia into a number of separate independent state entities and nuclear weapons will fall into the hands of uncontrolled individuals. All other options for the use of nuclear weapons are still unrealistic, even if Russia loses to Ukraine in this war.

I've always been amazed by your "one twist in the brain and life is beautiful" show.

I won't waste much time on you, it's more efficient to spend it just doing nothing :) One fact - a pathetic parody of the Nazi Fuhrer, has already signed an order to conscript 150,000 meat to pelt the advancing AFU forces. That's the open part. There is also a "closed part" - attempts to create "volunteer units", and negotiations with the criminals, previously murdered by Putin, Prigozhin, that it is time to recruit thieves, rapists, pedophiles, murderers from prisons to Wagner again. Guess who doesn't have enough live, disposable force ? :)

PS I'll let you keep making up stupid fuschte "facts" for the amusement of the forum audience  ;D ;D ;D

Let's start with that Russia suffering a military defeat from Ukraine is not very feasible simply because Russia has way more people than Ukraine. As simple as that. Russia's population is about 143 million, Ukraine (according to their own recent data) has about 23 million left. That's a huge difference. So far, Russia only had one wave of mobilization and according to their officials, they are even planning to vacate all mobilized troops because of the huge number of new contract troops recruited. So they have huge mobilization reserves, probably many millions of fighters. Simple math.

In the first days of invasion Putin said that Russia is going to protect it's territory using every possible weapons they have, including nukes. As Russia considers Crimea their territory, in case some country (any country) will try to invade it, nuclear strike will be carried out. I read your bs above, well, what can I say: "preventive non-nuclear strike" is nonsense. Any kind of strike will lead to a counter-strike by Russia, turning Washington, London, Berlin, Warsaw to dust within minutes. That's exactly why it's not possible to defeat a nuclear superpower - the entire world will lose as everything will be destroyed. There will be no winners. Do you want to find out if Putin is capable of this? Frankly, I don't.  ::)


What kind of failures? like building a solid line of defense and destroying the attacking enemy? And don't start with that "Russia is going to disintegrate into many independent states" propaganda. It's simply hilarious.  ;D ;D

I like your perspective, man. It's nice to call anyone who chooses what is more profitable for them a prostitute. So can I call you prostitute? Because as far as I can see, you are advertising sherbet.com instead of your OWN site, serveria.com. I can't blame you because you have chosen what is most profitable for you.

Just because you don't like someone's behavior does not give you the right to insult him or them!

That's a weird comment man. Just read some of DrBeer's posts - there are tons of insults in each and every post. Yet you pretend to not see it and pick one comparison which was not even meant as an insult in my post.  ::)

On November 30, 1939, Russia, then still part of the Soviet Union, attacked Finland, trying to move the border from Leningrad and create a pro-Soviet puppet government in the country. Soviet military leaders planned to end the war in 20 days and march to Helsinki, giving Stalin a birthday present on December 21. The population of Finland at that time was 3.7 million people, and the USSR was more than 180 million.

On February 24, 2022, Russia launched a large-scale attack on Ukraine, ostensibly attempting to push back possible NATO borders while installing a pro-Russian government in Ukraine. Putin planned to end the war in 3-7 days and on May 9 to hold a parade of his troops on Khreshchatyk in Kyiv. But the war has been going on for more than a year and a half, and the successes of the Russians in this war are more than doubtful.

Many researchers and analysts now compare these two wars and find a lot in common, including the fact that these wars were the greatest disgrace for the USSR/Russia and their armies. As in the war against Finland, many Russians now do not know why they are dying in Ukraine, and low morale leaves a big imprint on the results of any wars, largely leveling out the population in the countries of the aggressor and the victim of the attack.

Russia declared its territory not only the Ukrainian Crimean peninsula, but also the Zaporozhye, Kherson, Lugansk and Donetsk regions of Ukraine. Moreover, even those territories that were never occupied in this war. Why doesn’t Putin use nuclear weapons, since the Ukrainian Armed Forces are now located in the officially annexed territories of Russia?
Now the Ukrainian Armed Forces are very actively attacking Russian military installations on the territory of Crimea with the help of missiles and drones, periodically conducting landings and openly declaring the imminent liberation of Crimea. Where is the retaliatory nuclear strike?

Indeed, the destruction of infrastructure and loss of human capital, and diversion of resources to support the war effort typically lead to economic decline rather than growth. Additionally, your observation regrading decline stock market is also valid as people prefer to buy food and medicines for their survival rather than investing in risky assets like stock market.

It is important to note that once the war concludes, economy often experiences a significant boost as reconstructions activities surge and international financial initiations such as world bank and many international development banks frequently provide funding for rebuilding of infrastructure, which contributes to economic recovery and growth.

War is not good for any country, because a country is not only economically damaged due to war, all the people of that country are afraid of losing their lives and all the image of that country is ruined.  We have already noticed that the war between Russia and Ukraine has caused a lot of damage to the two countries and their neighboring countries, and many people have been injured and killed. The war has caused a lot of damage, from the energy of the country to the financial sector, the trade sector and the international level, especially in the economy and deep and has a lasting effect.

You forgot to mention that Ukraine was also a part of the Soviet Union and therefore technically you attacked Finland.  ;D

In Finland, Russia wasn't fighting against the whole white world like in Ukraine. They were not backed by CIA, military intelligence satellites, tanks, APCs, drones, HIMARS, artillery systems, Starlink, their troops were not trained by NATO. Finland's budget wasn't sponsored by US and EU. Still see no difference?  ;D

I haven't seen his posts yet but I'll check it soon. I'll give you an advise for Turks be careful on your words. Even if you don't want to be mean but be careful on your comparisions. Some words might be troublesome for you. Maybe it's not a insult for you but it might be others.

If you had expressed the above analogy in Turkey, you would probably have opened your eyes in a hospital.   

Before war can occur, there must be some challenging factors that would have led to the incident of having war, though it may involves loss of lives but the major reason why the war was ignited must be well addressed, people are really suffering, the economy is getting bad and unaffordable for the average citizens, it's very difficult to see the interrelationships between those in political power and the citizens they govern, there are feedbacks on what the people are facing but less adequate and necessary steps to solve those challenges.

War could affect the supply or price of crude oil positively or negatively, take for instance the blown up of the Nord Stream pipeline is a major contributor to the skyrocketing gas prices and the present harsh economic situation facing the world right now,  while on the other hand, the major suppliers of oil will be milking money out of it, like Russia and Saudi Arabia.

For sure, due to Fear of uncertainties and doubts during a war,  investors would be forced to pull their funds out of the market, which in some cases results in a stock market price crash.

One of the key problems in assessing the real situation is the wrong definition of the situation. To clarify - this is not a war between Russia and Ukraine, it is an attack by Russia on an independent state, a violation of all the obligations previously signed and assumed by Russia, a violation of all humanitarian and universal human norms, it is simply open terror and destruction of everything on the territory of Ukraine. I.e. it is not some economic/political dispute/conflict, it is a new Nazism, the purpose of which is to destroy and seize new territories. If you assess what is happening from this real point of view, you will realize how global this problem is. And if the problem is not solved (new international terrorism / Nazism - RASHISM) today's problems will seem to the world "flowers" against the background of what it will expect when this brown plague spreads around the world.

It clearly has an impact, because the war that occurs apart from being directly detrimental to the countries that are at war, even countries that are not taking part in the war will be affected, one of which is the global economy, of course this is very detrimental for countries that depend on other countries, because it will hinder the cycle. the economy of each country, the very real impact is the increase in prices of basic necessities and other basic materials, okay it could be that a country with a stable level of economic independence will not have that much of an impact but what is clear is that when a country is at war it is not only the economy that will be disrupted but also security and stability. The comfort of citizens will also be threatened because the country's status is currently in the midst of a global social and political war.

I completely share your views that wars are never good for humanity, while it could benefit some politicians and weapons manufacturers for a short period, but eventually everybody suffers. We can see this in the context of Russia/Ukraine war, where all of us sharing the burden by paying high cost of fuel, energy and food beside immense human and collateral losses.

It is essential for global leaders to seek a peaceful resolutions and actively work towards a world where conflicts are resolved through dialogues.

GDP can't increase due to War. When War occurs, national GDP decreases and falls  speedy. When an area is destroyed due to War, most resources are used to save lives of hunted people.GAP cannot maintain its position. Oil is used in all types of weapons. So, oil affects a lot in every War. Stock market  shares value falls due to War. Everyone want to sell his stocks due to which it's prices go down. War impacts on all type of trades . From small to big business owners, it affects a lot. And prices decreases.

Yes, it is true that the influence of war in this world is quite large on the economy and trade and in fact the impact is felt by almost the whole world, not just countries where conflict occurs, it is caused by the influence of trade between countries and also global news so that people will tend to protect themselves. assets from all investments.
This is quite normal and this is the reality, even now we are slowly experiencing the increase in food prices almost all over the world.

War is one of the biggest factors that make the economy suffer each country will spend its resources in case of emergency only people who have the power and capability can survive most of the country makes an investment and alliance with other countries to make sure they are safe, that's why there's a UN (I don't know other alliance form for the protection) to protect and have a peace talk to every country to prevent this happen or else there's a new world of suffering until the other country dominates the others. The only one who suffer here is the people who just want to live a simple life.

that's right. I think the impact is even bigger than that. but the most important thing I think is the economy, especially in terms of food. in war food remains the main source of human energy. if there is a war of course its circulation will be very difficult. I think this is the main problem that is more serious than anything else from the war.

Due to the war, almost all the countries of the world have a negative impact. I think the three things you mentioned were all affected by the war. Which country in the world has gained financial prosperity by the  war between Russia and Ukraine? Inflation increased all the country, oil prices have increased tremendously all over the world.

We can say that every country is more or less affected. Bank reserves have started to decline, business has shown a contractionary trend. It has also affected the stock market. It goes without saying that people are not at peace in any way. People are now dismayed by the increase in the prices of daily necessities. Not only that, where the war is going on, people's public life is facing a more dire situation.

War don't just happened, it started as a misunderstanding when countries stand to gain benefits from that altercation, and they will strike you where they know that you will suffer the most. Have you thought why they sanctions Africa countries, because they can't do much, and that's why they do threatened them with that but I dare them try that with China and Russia, they know their limit and that's why they don't go beyond what will come back to hunt them. If US has misunderstanding with any other powerful country, the first thing they do is that make sure it doesn't comes close to the stock market, that's one of the weakest point of their economy, remember the biological covid that kill stock market, if it was a War, it will be worst than that kind of crash we experienced back then.

War isn't good, everyone lose but there are some that will never recover again, many that are rich will fall to the wrong side of history and become poor in their next life, imagine billgate lose everything and turn to average millionaire because the wolrd has changed from how it wass, that's why you make sure we don't go into war, it benefits but at what expenseses, not worth it.

War is of course the biggest economic inhibiting factor, a country that is involved in a war will stop the economic process from production to distribution, it is normal if there is inflation that reaches thousands of percent because people will find it difficult to get the necessities of life, and of course the country will take a long time to recover from the conditions of the war.

Instead of trying to find a peaceful middle ground, global powers try to sway the war for one side, the right side to be fair and I agree with them but that doesn't bring in peace unfortunately.

I mean when you look at it, Ukraine was the one that got Russia attack on their soil, Ukraine didn't attack Russia, that was a land that belonged to Ukraine and Russia wanted to take it from Ukraine by force, by killing thousands of innocent people, because "Russians lived there", if that is the precedent, that means if enough Mexicans go from Mexico to Texas, then Mexico could open war against USA and take Texas, that's okay? Does that make sense?

I mean USA would destroy entire Mexico in 24 hours that is another topic but still that is not a valid reason and never was. Now Ukraine is trying to get it back, but as we can see THOUSANDS of Ukrainians and Russians die and result doesn't change, they are just throwing bodies to the problem and nothing changes.

There can be no middle ground in Russia’s attack on Ukraine. Either Russia will seize Ukraine and the terror of the civilian population of Ukraine will increase significantly, or Russia will suffer military defeat and will be deprived of the opportunity to carry out similar attacks in the future. Something in between means freezing the war and allowing Russia, over time, to revive its already lost combat power in manpower and equipment and, after some time, begin an invasion again. Russia is already close to defeat, and therefore Ukraine needs to continue to provide all possible support from the international community in order to eradicate the evil that comes from Putin’s Russia.

However, I do not understand your expression that it was Ukraine that forced Russia to attack their land. An aggressor, if he wants to attack a neighboring country, will in any case find a pretext for such an attack. But I would like to hear from you how Ukraine finally forced Russia to attack its territory, while losing a significant part of its population and half destroying its economy.

I will answer you as a citizen of Ukraine who saw all this with my own eyes. The problem is that this is not some kind of “local, small dispute between two countries” where it would really be reasonable to find a compromise solution. Russia came to DESTROY us. Completely destroy. And as Golda Meir said: You cannot negotiate with someone who has come to kill you.
This is reality - a maniac whose goal is to kill you will not negotiate with you, because... His goal is not agreement, but your destruction. This is exactly what the situation looks like in Ukraine. For one thing, I highly recommend listening to Russian state news channels - there is the wildest mixture of Nazism, xenophobia, misanthropy, denial of rights, ... RASHIZM (Russian Nazism) is worse than the brown plague of Nazism! Therefore, Russia itself, with its policies and openly stated goals, left us no choice.

Let me add - we will all learn very soon that the terrorist attack on Israel is a “joint project of Hamas and the Kremlin ghouls,” believe me...

Just for information: The Russian authorities and Hamas maintain relations, and representatives of the group go to Moscow for negotiations. The last such visit took place in March 2023. Hamas is recognized as a terrorist organization by the European Union, Germany, Israel, Canada, the USA, Japan, as well as a number of other countries.

Every time there's a sudden shock of war, these commodities increase and I'm not so sure why also the ones that these businesses especially in the oil sector. Despite having that stock that they've bought cheaper than the current price will also have its sudden increase based on the move of the world market. They're all reasoning out that it's because of the world market but the point is, they've bought it even before and those are stock supplies that they're just emptying before restocking and buying the current market price. They're all business folks but they also have to understand that everyone is suffering at these times and they shouldn't just come up with the idea that just because everything has gotten up in prices, they'll also include all of those stocked supplies like oil that has been bought at a fair low price and will be resupplied to their stations and will be sold at a higher value. And as they wait for another price decrease, that's when they will restock through the oil depots and will buy them again a cheaper rate, that's what they've been doing all this time and are just rinsing and repeating while taking all of those profits into their pockets.

Your perspective on implication of wars is indeed  insightful. whenever a war breaks out in the  Europe, the Middle East or any part of the world, it typically leads to supply chain disruptions in the global supply chain. These disruptions cause pricews of commodities including food and oil, to rise. ultimately leading to significant increase in inflation.

In summary, geopolitical tensions have profound effect on all economic macro indicators. It is noteworthy that, we now live in a global village, where pleasant or unpleasant event in any part of the world in one part of the world has far reaching global consequences.

It's a domino impact for the most. We don't want it to happen but whatever triggers these price increases are obviously starting with the price hike through oil/gas. Looking at these situations, there seems to be no solution to these matters because no matter how much we want to save and survive in these times, there's always this catalyst that makes every commodity high. If there's no way, there could be other factors that we don't know will impact it.

Exactly. It's like we're no longer into boundaries and we're all affected by these geopolitical events that are happening in different parts of the world. Even if we're against these things, there is nothing that we can do because its impact is globally distributed and the poorest countries are the ones that are suffering on this one. While the rich countries can recover quickly even if there's a continuous economy turmoil that can be seen to all.

War creates nothing good bad difficulties and price increases. Everyone suffers the inflation but I was worried about those people who are really poor which I see that suffered the most. The recovery seems too slow and trauma seems not easy to forget which means that it was not only the economy that got affected but also caused psychological impact on the survivors. The more wars are created, the more it leads to hatred and misunderstanding, and in our mind now is revenge.

If we compare Israeli-Palestinian conflict with Russo-Ukrainian war, Israel has been so much more brutal and merciless so far. Did Putin cover-bomb the sh*t out of Ukraine? No. Did he deliberately target densely-populated residential areas? Not really. Israel doesn't give a damn about hostages! Some of them have already been killed in airstrikes. Did Russians cut off water, internet, electricity, gas supply to Ukraine? Nope.

Right now Israel is pulling heavy tanks and other armored vehicles to the Palestinian border. They offered 24 hours for the civilians to flee the area. Seriously? Over a million people in 24h?   :o   

Of obviously, the war has a significant impact on the stock market. We know that this causes economic instability in the country. Furthermore, investors are reconsidering whether or not to invest initially, which produces an increase in inflation and interest rates, which has an impact on the stock market.

When interest rates rise, economic development slows, causing stock prices to fall, causing consumers to drop or cut their spending on average. So having a war in a country is pretty bad.

There's no winner in this war. Or maybe there's one, the arms dealer.  :D

All of it will be affected and there's no question about it. It's just a matter of time before they will feel it and we will too because they will try to take back whatever is lost and a part of that is their economy so price hikes will come and every consumer will be in trouble on how they will budget their salaries afterward.
We already felt the sudden oil price hike because of the sanction and it hurts a lot that many car owners decided to just use alternatives like riding a bike to work. I can say that because I see many bikers now here in my place and it became a sport to them because of its incentives as a way to exercise.
Somehow, the war has also done something a little good to the perspective of people about saving money.

That is true. There is no real winner when it comes to war as there are always prices to pay, and by that what I mean is that each of us (even those who are not directly affected by it) will feel the effects of war soon enough. In order for a country to get back up and return to how it used to be there will be repercussions. Even the arms dealers will soon feel the negative effects of war despite claiming that they are the ones who will be rained on by the good advantages brought by war because at the end of the day, they will also have to purchase stuff, have access to transportation, communication, and build relations-- all that were directly affected by war.

Absolutely, globalization has indeed made our economies and societies increasingly interdependent. It's evident that we can not do much to halt such unfortunate events related to this phenomena, and developing countries are often bearing the major brunt of its consequences. Nevertheless, we live in a world where social media has emerged as a strong tool where everybody can express his concerns. We should essentially leverage platforms of social media to advocate for justice and equality. This means we can join all together and make our voices louder and fight against unfairness and inequality.

If we talk about nuclear war, we'll leave the earth with them.

In times of war, countries in war doesn't hold back, they will do all they need to fight for their sovereignty. That's the unfortunate part of being in war, we all suffer for what's best for the majority of us, most of people will die and be just a memory for the others. 

That's a lame idea, money is worthless in times of war, or post-war periods it has to take some time for the money to gain that power again.

Talking about war, not only about who is the winner but depend with war regarding defend their land, religion and their freedom and why war can't stoppable until right now. Beside have another important thing with war as business and why can't stop for longer time war keep continues around the war. We can see with United State as country selling their gun and help some countries get war invasion, last year helped Ukraine by giving thousand hundred of gun machine and right now have rumor on media about their gun using in war between Hamas and Israel, who get benefit with war as business and some citizen try to defending their land but have interest conflict as business make war can't stopping yet.

In every war there are always people who win, well governments that win, because in some way the resources that the people or governments of the countries at war stop producing because of what has happened, that is why other countries open themselves up to them, run out. a higher market than they did not have before, that is an opportunity, it is not the idea to be happy about what happens, because these are things that include many innocent people dying, but the economy has moved to another level and that is something that should not It may be, but it works like that, sometimes the world is quite cruel.

All states are cautious during war. They want to minimize their exposure to changes in the market. States may also take positions depending on the public reaction to statements made by other countries about the war.

Every war affects the global economy. Every war mobilizes a part of the global economy. Wars usually have a negative impact as they cause uncertainty in the economy. At the same time, the duration of the war is also important for the economy, as it will be important what cautious states will do.

Nobody wins in war, both parties suffer devastating results and debris, casualties, and economic losses.
And also, the impact has spread globally affecting the prices of our commodities. As the war continued, more and more individuals suffered. This should not have happened if nobody had thought of evilness and if they knew what would be the impact on our life.
After the war we never expect a country to recover fast, it takes several months or even years for people to sacrifice their freedom and comfortable living, and psychological impact on the kids.

You say that the United States, with its weapons transferred to other countries, helps them invade other countries and gives an example of such assistance with weapons to Ukraine and Israel. I consider such examples unfortunate, since Ukraine and Israel were victims of the attack. In this case, the United States is transferring its weapons so that Ukraine and Israel can defend themselves from attacks on them. But any defense will be effective only if the defender, after an attack on him, launches retaliatory strikes against military targets on enemy territory. Ukraine is doing this and Israel is doing this in the Gaza Strip, from where missiles are launched.

In order to discredit the Armed Forces of Ukraine and reduce the assistance provided to Ukraine, Russia, even on the eve of the Hamas attack on Israel, transferred foreign military equipment captured at the front in Ukraine to Hamas. This provocation of Russia at least indicates that they knew about the impending attack by Hamas on Israel, and given the video that is now being distributed of the moment the fence was broken into Israeli territory, where Russian speech “Cover”, “Forward” is heard among armed people in camouflage, as well as the fact that now on Russian territory they are recruiting militants into the Wagner PMC to participate in Hamas units, Russia is directly participating in this war on the side of Hamas and actively participated in preparatory actions for an attack on Israel.

Israel has chosen the most effective method of fighting terrorists - their total destruction. And this should have been done with Russia, but unfortunately our forces are not equal.
But all the same - rashism will also be destroyed!

Regarding what Putin and Russian citizens did in Ukraine: Entire large cities and hundreds of small towns and villages were destroyed, hundreds of thousands of civilians, peaceful cities were destroyed by brutal bombing, autumn 2022 - attempts to destroy the energy infrastructure of Ukraine, destruction of the heating system in winter, explosion Hydroelectric power stations, torture, kidnappings of children, constant shelling of peaceful cities with both missiles and UAVs.... This is pure terrorism + Nazism. And this evil is called - RACHISM! And only after the destruction of the center of world terrorism will the world economy be able to return to stability and development.

Have you ever thought about arms dealers, who need war to weaken other countries so they themselves can maintain their power? Those are the winners. Don't just look at warring countries and say that war doesn't bring benefits or anything good. War will kill people, kill innocent people, but will bring benefits to those who want to manipulate the world, those who are addicted to power...If the war did not bring any benefits, it could not be maintained until today.

The effects of wars on economies are immediate and there is a winning side and a losing side. The losers are usually the poor and the middle class, innocent people. The winners, as we all know, are the monopolistic companies and arms manufacturers that control energy prices. After the 9/11 attacks, the endless regional wars are still going on and i recommend you to look at the profits of arms dealers and manufacturers during the war. Wars are inevitable because of the consequences of dominating energy and wars inevitably disrupt the global economy. With war, commodity prices, which are the cornerstones of the global economy, go up the threat of a food crisis emerges, the stock market collapses, companies, which are the engines of the global economy, disappear with war, and most importantly, global growth slows down. All this has a profound impact on the lives of innocent people.

It all depends on how the confrontation between Western civilization and totalitarian/terrorist regimes ends. In case of a positive outcome, as in World War II, the world will develop a new strategy and build a new world economy taking into account the "mistakes of the past". But the nuance is that the First and Second World Wars were "classical hostilities", but now the situation is different - terrorism, violation of all laws and agreements, economic terror and sabotage, incitement of local conflicts escalating into global ones.... And the solution will be much more complicated than a simple military confrontation.

The impact of war on the economy will of course cause economic conditions to drop, countries involved in war such as Palestine certainly create a lot of worry about long-term economic conditions, and in my opinion the best thing to immediately improve the economy is assistance from other countries.

Apart from aid from other countries, the other best thing that must be done by the parties in charge of the state is to immediately stop the war because if the war continues, the negative impact on the economy will continue to occur so that the parties who want to send aid will also experience fatigue. . So the best thing for this is to stop the war so that the economic sector can be immediately improved in stages, after all every war there will always be casualties so this is not very good for humans who can still live in this world.

Yes, in war it is not a matter of winning or losing. But those who benefit from war, in this case, are those who sell weapons. Talking about how the US, IMF, other countries, and banks continue to want to provide aid to Ukraine. But this “aid” is actually a loan.

And Ukraine is already in debt. If everyone in the world wanted the best for Ukraine, they would cancel its debt. After this war, win or lose, Ukraine will have a huge debt that they will have to pay off. This is also what happened in the war between Israel and Hamas fighters.

Actually, war was not good because it destroyed the dreams of many young people. Making them flawed, bitter and cruel. Life is too short and precious to fight a war right now. War cannot give life, war can only bring suffering to all parties.

At this stage, Ukraine needs to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity from the encroachments of Russia, which wants to destroy Ukraine as a state. All other problems for Ukraine are fading into the background for now. Yes, Ukraine’s debt under international obligations is now growing, but these problems can be solved and are much smaller in scale than in the case of its capture by Russia. In addition, a significant part of financial and material assistance is allocated to Ukraine free of charge. And in the case of loans, the situation is not so tough. After the war, depending on its results, assistance to Ukraine will continue to be provided, including, most likely, the issue of debt restructuring will also be raised.

We all know that nothing good comes out of war, right? Why did the war have a good effect? Not everyone is. Yes, we can save money. But do we think we can buy properly with money when we go out of our home when the place we are in is fighting? isn't there either.

Except for distant countries at war but not yet exempt. because other goods like oil and gasoline will be affected, and I don't know the others. These are just a few of those that can really be affected.

War, instigated by the the most useless nations and politicians on the planet, has an impact on everyone else around the world. It is caused by little men with big egos who want to impose their will violently on other people. People like Putin and the heads of the Iranian government are some of the evilest people around. They have made life harder for so many people around the world, creating instability and even starvation, because it is the very poorest who suffer the greatest. Richer countries are somewhat insulated in comparison, with more controlled price rises and the bigger ability to absorb extra costs. You can discount stock market values entirely however as they ebb and flow, making and breaking wealth all the time.

Then why in the world they're attacking peaceful residents of Gaza? Destroy the terrorists, not hospitals and nurseries.

Then I stopped reading your post, because a bit fat chunk of propaganda follows... "Entire large cities and hundreds of small towns and villages were destroyed" please name at least a single "large city" "destroyed" by Russia.  ;D

After bombing a hospital in Gaza and an estimated death toll of around 700 civilians. The Israeli army continues to attack a hundred-year-old Christian church that shelters 500 civilians. Is that what they call anti-terrorism? Are all Palestinians terrorists? What is confusing is that many people cannot even distinguish between terrorists and civilians but always say that terrorists must be fought. What is happening in Palestine is terrible, the Israeli army is no different from brutal fascists and imperialists.

These are images I found on social network X.
https://imgtr.ee/images/2023/10/20/1149322ad0a310084c7d32baead08dcc.jpeg
https://imgtr.ee/images/2023/10/20/d3790b9718e6903962ecd61413430c4c.jpeg

Typical behavior of a Russian propaganda carrier...

Okay, I'll give you some training too.
Mariupol. More than 70,000 civilian corpses were found in the city morgues after the Russian attacks. But we know that Russian occupants in other cities organized mass executions of civilians and then tried to hide the traces of crimes, so the real number of destroyed civilians is unknown. The city itself is completely destroyed by more than 50%, and 95% of the city was destroyed by bombings and shootings.
Marinka. There is simply no city left. Earlier there lived more than 10.000 population.
Bakhmut. The city is completely destroyed, the city, before the Russian terrorist attack, was inhabited by more than 75,000 people.
Volnovakha, Izium, Popasnaya, Rubizhne, Severodonetsk, Brovary, Irpin, ..... it could go on for a very long time...
But you will deny everything. You will smirk and with sadistic pleasure tell some delusional tales "the U.S. and the Banderites are to blame for everything" What is the point of proving anything to you?
But the good thing is that you and your kind will no longer be able to promote the Russian narratives "it's an internal conflict in Ukraine", "Russia has nothing to do with it" and will not be able to hide the wildest crimes of Rashism !

What Russia with the Rashist ideology has arranged in Ukraine is already recognized as genocide. The same genocide, which the Kremlin for the last 80 years, organized against the inhabitants of Poland, Finland, Ichkeria, Georgia, Moldova and many other countries. But the time will come and the bearers of this ideology will be punished for their crimes. And then there will be no more sadistic smirks of sadists.....  

https://www.moscowtimes.ru/2023/09/26/oon-nachala-rassledovanie-protiv-rossiiskih-gospropagandistov-po-obvineniyam-v-podstrekatelstve-k-genotsidu-a108038


And back to the economic news:
- Hamas's militant wing, the al-Qassam Brigades, moved its Web site to Russian hosting days after a series of attacks on Israel. This was reported by the Insikt Group, the threat research arm of Recorded Future, a private intelligence company.
Where will the terrorists go? Only to their terrorist brethren.

- The part of the Russian population that does not support President Vladimir Putin should be isolated or destroyed, Duma deputy Andrei Gurulev said on the Rossiya-1 TV channel.
According to the idea of Gurulev, a unanimous Democrat and member of the lower house defense committee, about 20 percent of Russian citizens could be subject to "annihilation." That's about 29 million people, according to Rosstat, which estimates the country's permanent population at 146.4 million.
I would add here that the figures are overstated. Russia has no more than 100 million people. And that was ...

- Russia has offered 32 million hectares of Siberia for grain for China. Putin, going to his master Xi, decided to give him a gift - the land of Russia :) Thus begins the sellout of russia. And also "returning china's historical lands to its native harbor"  ;D ;D ;D

Your posts are getting more and more idiotic each day...   ;D ;D ;D

Firstly, 70k is more than entire civilian death toll in all of Ukraine from the start of the war:


https://www.ohchr.org/en/news/2023/01/ukraine-civilian-casualty-update-30-january-2023

Next, I presume the AFU is the most effective army in the world? We already know they have 0 casualties, but according to you it seems they never hit a single civilian by mistake? AFU have magic bullets which kill exclusively Russian soldiers?  ;D  They never place artillery systems in residential neighborhoods and never use civilians as a cover? The "warriors of light" use anti-aircraft systems so precisely, that they only take down Russian missiles, drones and planes, debris and parts never hit the residential buildings - they fall on the ground only in uninhabited locations.  ;D ;D ;D

I'm sure such brainless trolls like you actually believe this propaganda crap. Israel killed more civilians in several days than Russia in 1.5 years!  

Not sure what you're talking about here. Some complete paranoid nonsense!  ;D

Not true. Google what genocide is.
You're too retarded to understand this. Big % Russians live in Eastern Ukraine and many also serve in AFU. So it's more like pro-Western Russians vs pro-Russia Russians. So it's in fact genocide of Russians sponsored by the US.

Btw, Ichkeria is not a country, it's a part of Russia.

It's funny how a brainless troll can turn positive news into negative. It's actually Russia signing grain deal with China. 32 million hectares is a real number from real news but used by a troll in a wrong context. So a major grain deal had been signed between Russia and China:


https://www.msn.com/en-xl/money/other/china-and-russia-supercharge-trade-with-record-grain-order-bolstering-food-and-energy-security-as-western-pressure-persists/ar-AA1iz3If

Let me give you a little shocker. There is a small exception to this . Not all stocks decline. See this news report from CNN some days ago about the Israel Palestine conflict and the stocks from these companies. So those who have invested in these stocks re cashing out right now. I don't like it because it seems like thet are supporting the conflict through their stock investment but then again what can they do.

I understand that Nazism, especially such a yardstick variety as RASHISM, has one concept - lie, lie, lie and lie again. Lie everywhere and always. And deny all the facts.
I will not continue this topic with you, you are behaving extremely disgustingly towards dead, peaceful, innocent people. This is called “dancing on bones” and denouncing crimes, trying to reduce the real tragedy.
I hope that sooner or later this will be rewarded to you, and you will know what the “boomerang of fate” is...
I apologize to all participants in this thread, but this is disgusting to read and listen to... This is the face of RASHISM and the “Russian world” - to kill, destroy... and then lie and deny, with a vile grin...

PS According to the Ilyichevsk morgue, 87 thousand deaths were documented in Mariupol.
There is also a database of unidentified people. Unidentified bodies of civilians are in mass graves. According to the latest data, there were about 26 thousand such people. There is a database on them in the Novoazovsky Prosecutor's Office.
However, even these figures are not final, because there are still bodies in the courtyards and under the rubble, and some of the dead were taken out by the occupiers and buried in unknown graves.

Only in the Mariupol Drama Theater, where civilians were hiding from the terrible bombing with FAB-500 bombs, at least 600 civilians died under the ruins. It will most likely not be possible to find out the exact number of victims. The Russian occupiers then simply brought in excavators, loaded the remains of the destroyed building mixed with body parts and took them away for a hidden burial so that no one would know the scale of this massacre....

Should we assume that war is a means of replenishment to delapidated economic performance all over the world or not, if we consider the past event of the experience in war, the cost of lives and the rate of amounts worth countless rates being lost at the cause together with the innocent souls being affected, we can see that war is not the perfect economical solution, but people are, if we can start the beginning of the change in us right from our individual behaviors in the society.

It's absolutely terrible. Civilians are never in favor of war, they don't even want their own country to initiate wars unless they see that another country is invading and taking away all their civil rights and is killing innocent people and destroying the country without any reason, that is when maybe civilians start to think or say that their country should at least take a stand instead of just seeing such cruelty happening within the country and to their people.

A country that kills innocent civilians and then calls them terrorists is wrong, even if there are some terrorists residing within that country, that doesn't make it right for them to bomb the whole country, kill thousands of people just for maybe a few that they consider terrorists, that is not how things should be done and everyone should condemn such acts of cruelty.

You also forgot about the most important factor in an economy and a war: Manpower. When a large-scale war happens, people who are supposed to work in the production are instead pooled into military service to better give their country chances at winning the war. Thus the decline in stock prices and the ensuing economic collapse that happens right after the war. Not to mention the fact that most war veterans can't go back to work so it's not like they are given the job security they are hoping for.

War is never a good thing, the only ones who benefit from this are the arms dealers and those who resell war machines after the fact. No one, not even the rich are exempt when a threat of global conflict occurs.

Manpower getting affected by war directly hits the economy through the product cut. When the required production cut takes place, automatically the demand rises and the same reflect on the pricing. Another thing, when war happens between two countries the transportation gets affected. This doesn't affect the specific countries involved in war, but it affects the rest of the world. This also have its effect over the pricing of essential services.

With most of the war, the war machine suppliers used to be the first world country. This means they get affected in one way through the economy getting disturbed, but through the other way they get an income. This is kind of mutually compensated.

What is clear is that this will definitely happen if war between countries will have a negative impact on the economy and health. Apart from veterans, if they win a war, this will also result in industry in the country not functioning because it is vulnerable to poor security conditions. In the end, many people do not work and do not earn money to meet their living needs.


Sometimes I suspect that every time there is a war between countries, there must be a third party who deliberately causes the war to happen so that the arms trading countries gain profits from the war. Because it is impossible for a business to exist without buyers.

They only liar here is you! You keep spreading false and misleading information without even trying to provide sources. You also keep ignoring facts provided by me which are always backed by valid sources from reputable Western media. I hope you realize you look like a complete bozo. Credibility of your posts is zero.   ;D

Oh yeah, the world-famous Ilyichevsk morgue the most reputable source... who haven't heard of Ilyichevsk morgue?  ;D ;D ;D

87k dead in Mariupol could be true, but 87k AFU soldiers. As to the stats on civilian deaths see my source above.  8)



and then there's this:


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mariupol_theatre_airstrike

So it's actually your choice whom to believe.  8)

Certainly 100% true. War means loss. Maybe those who know how to make good use of technology or those who are in a strong financial position are relatively less harmed in war, but it is sure to be harmed by both parties. However, the war that is being practiced in worldwide is definitely not a good sign. All the powerful countries here want to keep their power over other countries. When there is no agreement between the two then the war starts. Wherever war is consisted, it has more or less impact on the people of the world, directly or indirectly. Therefore, instead of supporting war, any conflict should be resolved through reconciliation. If war is seen as a tool to sell arms then surely those countries will lose everything at one stage.

Kind of don't agree...

Not sure if they are correlated but we have seen/read of   a few cases that has lead to war all because of minerals like gold, diamonds and in some cases all because of territory like we have see in the current Russia Ukraine war. Don't get me wrong, oil is another primary reason for war!!

Stock market can be affected if the markets it supplies goods to one of these countries is caught in crossfire and because of the war can nolonger supply them as this market is closed then expect a red market.

War only brings losses to the participating nations and soldiers, while arms dealers receive the spoils unscathed. Therefore, war is the loss of innocent people, not the loss of some other people who create war for profit.

No one supports war except arms dealers and those who crave power. The ongoing wars are due to a struggle for power, so I think there will be no reconciliation if no country gives in first to reduce tensions.

By the way, I noticed that the countries that get rich through arms trade are mostly great powers and they are becoming stronger instead of losing everything like you said.

If you are talking in terms of power and money, you may be right, but in terms of ethics and human rights I don't think it benefits anyone.

And, as we've seen with Covid-19, globalization has broken the natural boundaries that always existed between countries/continents, so nowadays any war impacts every country in some degree. I don't know where you live, but chances are that you have witnessed it yourself the last time you went to a supermarket.

War only benefited the industries that were responsible for global arms production. I am of the opinion that they have a big say in the war, and they might even lobby for a war in a particular region because, for them, war means business. Just take the example of the Russia-Ukraine war and the ammunition provided to both countries. These arms dealers are getting rich at the expense of human lives.


The war can only impact the World if it is between the two major countries. Wars are going on in Africa frequently, but they are not impacting the global economy; on the other hand, the war between Russia and Ukraine did impact every nation and the global economy.

In my opinion a war of between two countries can make economical problem of other country. War make a nation ill damage their economical condition. A country suffer a lot because of war. Not that country who has connect with it every country of the world suffer a lot because of the war. Not every Nation make everything there depend of the other national for those what they can make. Because of war there is shortest up that goods or item in the market. Because of the shortest supply of this item in the market the price of the items high. Because of war not the price increase of item sometimes oil gold etc price is too high. Because of increasing price of item or some other components are commodities the people of lower income suffer a lot because of increasing price. In every country there is huge amount of people who live under the provety line because of the price hike and mainly war is the reason of the price high that's the reason why impact on the global economy.

The problem is that what is happening in the modern world, in our time, is not a "war between two countries". It is a war of the "axis of evil" against humanity, civilization, legality, and rules. This war is causing problems all over the world, although it seems to be very localized conflicts. Unfortunately, the world has played the game of loyalty and "let's negotiate," and this has allowed the hydra of terrorism, Nazism, and other anti-human concepts to grow stronger and claim their right to peace. And now we see for example Hamas terrorists uniting with the terrorist-Nazis of RASHISM, supported by other totalitarian anti-human regimes and groups. They do not want a free, developing world where there is a concept of legality. They need chaos, war, violence. They bring global destruction, death, total lies, propaganda of violence and misanthropy. They can make money only on grief and destruction, their audience is uneducated, poor people who do not see prospects and do not know what it is to live as a human being, stupefied by propaganda, and denying universal values

As we all know, war is never a good approach to conflict resolution, we see this menace continually occurring, where countries raise against countries because of either dominance or personal reasons, when there is war, so many business activities are being crippled and some commodities are temporary scarce, and this portrays a high-level demand in such commodity, the nations in one are been sanctioned as the case may be, the most nation that does business with them are being kept in jeopardy, the impact of war to the global economy is very enormous. 

I think that changes in society are initiated by individual behavior but in the global economy they are completely controlled by governments. Each price level is fixed by the government we do not monitor or monitor here. There is some lack of governance, some lack of efficiency another issue is transparency and accountability. This is wasted corruption is a big deal economic continuity growth and employment especially international trade is at a fairly satisfactory level compared to many other countries.

My understanding is that the economy is developing and can create prosperity for humans globally. You can be sure that the world and the country are safe without war or corruption and other negative things that can have a bad impact on the economy.

You definitely know the impact that occurs in wars, for example what happened in Israel vs. Palestine, there are developments in issues that are causing the two countries to have a negative impact on shares and investment, where investors are reluctant to invest their shares in these two countries, as well as other impacts of oil, GDP and so on, the economy is deteriorating in both countries.

This is a clear example of the impact of war on the global economy felt by society, not to mention the effects caused by other countries due to war, Ukraine vs. Russia and so on.

The answer is simple. This is one of the terrorists' "technologies" - to hide and cover themselves as civilians, exposing them to attacks, in order to create a flow of information in the media and "show evil". Such behavior is displayed by all terrorists - from MAHASA to terrorist troops of Russia ! And in the latter case even their so to speak president (in fact the head of the terrorist gang, an international criminal), openly said that they would put civilians of Ukraine in front of their terrorist fighters, and "let's see what they will do". This speech of the international criminal Putin V.V. is easy to find on YouTube :)
Also terrorists place their strike teams among residential buildings, and even in apartments of apartment buildings, for terrorist strikes - this is how Hamas launched rockets at Israel, the video is also easy to find.
Whether you read my posts or not is up to you, I don't care what you do :) The most important thing is that everyone knows who the terrorist are, what they are doing, and what they are responsible for. And the most important thing is that peaceful Gazans are dying, being framed by the very hands of Hamas.... So all questions about who and how they use Gaza's civilians, and what they die as a result of - ask Hamas....

By the way, a question for everyone: can anyone tell me why countries and groups that supposedly "care about the people of Gaza" do not accept them? Iran, Lebanon, and other supporters of terrorists do not accept Gazans in their countries, do not provide them with funding, do not provide them with housing.... But they continue to fund Hamas. Isn't that an amazing situation ? 

The world is interconnect and war in one region affects other regions. Generally, war threatens global economic stability, potentially resulting in inflation  higher prices and slower growth across different sectors. War affects the oil market and leads to adverse economic repercussions potentially causing increased oil prices globally triggering inflation and economic instability worldwide. War also leads to shortages of energy-related commodities influencing prices and growth not only in the region but also in surrounding areas.

This is relatively true with a few modifications. It is true that governments are the ones who determine the prices of everything and tax rates, and therefore they effectively control the internal economy. However, we must take into account the changes in the global economy that are strongly evident in a globalized world.
Let us take, for example, the 2008 financial crisis caused by the monetary policies of some American banks. This crisis led to the collapse of companies in many sectors in other countries geographically distant from the United States, in addition to affecting the entire banking sector around the world. This crisis, of course, contributed to higher inflation in some countries and increased deflation in several other markets.
This is quite similar to the effects of wars on war-related economies.

  War would do far more economic harm than good. Even if we limit the war to conventional arms, and considering who the combatant would be, at minimum we could expect significant destruction across Europe, a serious interruption of trade between the U.S. and China, and shocks to the global oil supply. On the labor front, the prevalence of computer-assisted assembly has ensured there would not be the kind of upswell of manufacturing jobs (ie, weapons suppliers) that would be sufficient to employ the masses of people whose services/financial-dependent jobs crumbled in the economic turndown.
   However, war also lead to a significant destruction of infrastructure, building and lives in area that is affected, which requires rebuilding efforts that will take a lot of resources and time. War can also bring the stock market down, nothing good comes out from war we see a typical example with the Israeli and Hamas, both children and adult are not safe from the war.
   

It won't take any country at that point to form an alliance to at least exchange resources rather than waging war to seize the resources by force. For a very long time, wars have been fought over dominance, resources, and many other things, if not for selfishness. And take a look at what's going on between Pakistan and Israel. See how their government's activities are impacting their populace and how deaths are occurring as a result of their acts. And you're right about the effects—many businesses will close, resources will become scarce, and people may even find it difficult to eat. The fact that missiles were falling in one country is alarming and demonstrates how irrational both nations are. The annoying thing is that it will cost the both countries when trying to reinstall normalcy talk about the road the electricity and other services in the country

I love how the Palestine topic makes these Ukrainian trolls feel like ants on a hot pan! So many lies and desperate attempts to justify Israel's war crimes (confirmed by the UN btw) in order to cover Uncle Sam's ass...  ;D

Don't tell me all these THOUSANDS of children killed by Israel were Hamas fighters. The hospital was full of Hamas fighters? This is just laughable excuse. Israel killed more civilians and children in particular than Putin in 1.5 years of war.


https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/gaza-turning-into-graveyard-of-children-says-unicef/3038756#


Listen, I knew that you were retarded but this is too much. Take a look at the map, bozo! You see where Gaza strip is located? How in the world these poor guys will get out of there?   ???

Another question is why they should leave their Motherland, the place where they were born and raised? Leave their old parents and young children behind? I think it's awful for you as a Ukrainian to say such things as you're in a similar situation. Imagine I'd tell you: leave Ukraine now!  ::)

In this modern era, there should be no need for war, there are quite a lot of negative effects that have a big impact on the world economy. However, the selfishness of a country in fighting for something that may be to control or want to show its identity as a strong country in the world has tarnished the brotherhood that has existed quite well so far.

If war continues without any peace efforts, the effects will be very bad. I think that if the war does not stop, the country could experience a recession due to minus GDP. Apart from that, it also causes economic depression ranging from unemployment, crime, to food crises. I really strongly condemn the war actions that continue to occur.

It is even funnier to watch the mental victims of Kremlin propaganda wishful thinking. How was the official meeting between representatives of Hamas (terrorist group) and representatives of the Kremlin (led by an international criminal), international aggressor and terrorist ?  ;)

By the way - and tell me - why were there no groans and hysterics from caring people like you when Russia was destroying hospitals, schools in Syria ? Or is it a different story and nothing is written in the propagandists' manual ?  ;D
"In total, according to Amnesty International, Russian and Syrian forces struck 53 medical facilities and 95 schools between April 30, 2019, and February 29, 2020 - mostly from the air, although isolated attacks by the Syrian army occurred on the ground. Many of the sites attacked, human rights activists note, were part of a UN database: the location of hospitals, schools and other buildings used for humanitarian purposes are made known to all sides in the conflict, specifically to avoid attacks on them."

The electoral truth has been known in Russia for a long time. More precisely about double and even triple standards.... so I'm not surprised, as usual. As well as with his mental "abilities".  ;D

"Take a look at the map, bozo! You see where Gaza strip is located? How in the world these poor guys will get out of there?" Take a good look at the map, and tell me - Gaza Strip is bordered on the west by which country ? I guess in your empty head it's also "Israel".... Israel all around!? :))))

Why Egypt, close in spirit, faith, and past (field of hard kicks from Israel) desire to fight against Israel, does not save them ? :) It is clear - Gaza Strip is a project to siphon money from all over the world, to enrich the heads of Hamas and the like. By the way, many heads of this movement are millionaires, and their preachers will never wear a shahid belt - they choose a comfortable life in this world, not with "concubines in the other world"... for some reason  ;D
Just like Putin and his "friends" say that you should "tighten your belts", "be patient", to their obedient population, they themselves live perfectly well without knowing any problems, and they send you to die in Ukraine. So even in this world of terrorism Hamas and Russia are twin brothers :)

PS And try not to realize your painful complexes in the topic about economy, but to write in essence :)

Here for example about "successes" of Russian economy and "problems" in the world :
 - The cost of gas with "tomorrow" settlement in the UK by 12:40 MSC fell by 10.48% to 111 pence per therm, and with "immediate delivery" by 12:38 MSC - by 8.8% to 114 pence per therm.
According to LSEG, supply remained high, with bids to pump gas from Norway up 11 million cubic meters per day to 321 million cubic meters compared to Monday. So, Europe will not freeze again without Russian gas ? :) By the way - why Gazprom has classified data on gas supply volumes since 2023 ? :)
- The Russian government is preparing a radical budget sequestration for a key project to develop domestic science to pay for the costs of the army and weapons production. No to science and health, yes to deaths
In 2024, spending on the federal project "development of infrastructure for scientific research" will be cut in half, according to an explanatory note to the budget law posted on the Duma database.
- The sale of russia continues. The land is being given to the new owner of russia: russia offered 32 million hectares of siberia for grain for china ....

War will of course have a huge impact on all fronts, including casualties on both sides, the economy and security. There is nothing positive about resolving a conflict with war, only benefits for the country that produces weapons.

What is clear is that if the war continues it will impact all countries with a scarcity of oil and gas. Sanctions against countries that have large resources will increasingly have a negative impact on the global economy. This causes world exports and imports to fall. Including export and import activities in my country are also affected. For example, the war between Russia and Ukraine, fertilizer in my country coming from Russia has also been hampered and the food yields of my country's farmers have also fallen.

Considering the world global economy, war will cause alot of misplaced priorities and businesses will be seriously affected in regions where war is prevalent, their will be instability of the people and the economy as well in such location will be seriously affected, war will cost loss of life and properties and the ones that will be majorly affected are the young ones and the innocent souls at the cause.

The modern world has received a very painful inoculation. This inoculation will rid the world economy (the process has just begun) of "unreliable partners", such as terrorist countries (classical and economic), will make it choose suppliers and build supply chains more carefully, as well as - diversification of supplies and moving away from monopolies of supply of certain critical resources/technologies.
For example, today the EU has completely secured its economy from gas from a terrorist country. Yes, I know that a couple of countries are still buying, but this is more a matter of psychiatry.....
Also the attention of the civilized world is now attracted by the tame and corrupt media, which have become the mouthpiece of propaganda and destabilization in some countries.
Today's unrest is likely to lead to a revision and tightening of migration policy in many European countries.
In short, the current situation is a very painful treatment of chronic diseases of the world economy.

Whenever war occurs consequences spread not only in that country but also across from the borders. When a state goes to war or is attacked by any other country the import and export of that country fully stops. The other country block trades with them and then if the enemy army surrounds the country they export their things. In warfare the role of oil is clear every country want to grab oil well the American are present in the KSA for the oil but the statement they follow is that they are here for the security of the KSA. And after the war when the country ends the war, the results will be very bad and they are trying to fix things just like originalgina,l and in this, the stock market may crash or go up and down.

If we take a look at what is happening in Ukraine now, we are going to see that billions of dollars had been lost since the beginning of the war and if care is not taken to end the war, things might escalate more making more properties to be lost and life expectancy might reduce because of the Chemicals and destructions that had been caused as a result of the war. Many people had lost there businesses and properties making them to start afresh again in another region. War can be very devastating and can cause serious havoc if it is not resolved as quick as possible.

This is not limited to only Russia and Ukraine crisis, we can consider Israel as well, Hamas is another consideration and many more other examples of the past and present that alot of people had suffered losses, are we to consider the Afghanistan war, Vietnam war and many more others to point at, war is not what we can pray to witness or have an exoer of because everyone will be affected seriously or those so dear and close to us.

War seriously affects us, our loved ones, the honest citizens of countries at war. But it is benefiting some authoritarian organizations and empires in the world. They are arms dealers, people who crave power and are willing to sacrifice the lives of others for their own pleasure or consider the deaths of innocent people as a place for them to do business. Those people will never care about the consequences of war on others, they only care about their own pockets and the profits they gain. We, the people, will not be able to do anything to stop the war, the only thing we can do is pray for the bloodlust of politicians to end soon.

War can cause precious damage to a country's overall economic stability. War can result in the loss of essential human, natural, and economic resources, affecting the economic structure of communities, businesses, and governments. It can waste time, effort, and resources and hinder overall improvement and growth. War causes a lot of infrastructural and human damage, and can cause inflation, trade disruptions, currency devaluations, and increases in government spending. In addition, many refugees and IDPs are relocated to camps, which can have social and economic communal effects.

 War dims the economy growth of a country if the war is an intensified war and countries are drawn into it will leave countries in recession, there will be shortages of food, fuel and medical supplies, for people to use.  Hospitals will be full and we be operating without electricity on most cases. War has never been a fun thing to experience. War could be prevented with just one dialogue, but in most cases people are power driven they are ready to go any extent to keep power. They’re are those who benefit from most of this war, so they secretly fund terrorist group just to get the attention of the government to be able to siphon money from the government. War is expensive to run, and it’s a best time to embezzle money without having traces, some people in power sees it as an opportunity. We don’t know what’s really happening behind closed doors innocent children with bright futures ahead of them will have to face  the consequences of the bad choices of some group of wealthy individuals.
  We don’t pray to witness war, from what we seeing with the Israel and Hamas war the destruction of properties are very scary sight, structures that took month or even years to erupt are being destroyed in split seconds, we don’t pray to experience any of this, people who had witnessed this before will pray never to experience this again.  War shouldn’t be the last resort to disagreements, I feel like theirs is nothing that can’t be resolved with dialogue, dialogue can help fix a lot of damages that had been caused, and even people are not driven by greed the world would have been a better place.

War is harmful. A number of studies have pointed to significant negative effects of war.
War is a major hindrance to globalization, as it reduces the global economic output.
It leads to a decline in global investment and trading.
It cripples the economy and destroys industrial infrastructure.
War in most cases usually drives a country into debt and the creditor nation takes advantage of this. It also leads to inflation, thereby making commodity prices to be higher than normal hence reducing the purchasing power.

That was what a powerful country wanted. they deliberately created the war just to control the victim country in the future. I am not surprised by the powerful country's strategy because we experienced since a long time ago. The problem now is why isn't it stopped by the UN, and why is it helped by allies?. even if they were aware, the allied countries felt the impact also, their currency was also compromised affecting the dollar. And there are some citizen countries who were involved in the war hard to find food and very frugal to keep the money because of the high cost of gas to heat the room.

And what are the benefits that other countries get from war, if not the chaos, fear, and trembling of some citizens, which can cause them to have some health issues? Even if a country does win a war, it doesn't make the economy better during that time. Things don't normally work well for that period until war is over, and there might even be some restrictions during that period, which can make some workers stop working, some companies stop production, and short down at that moment. If war lingers for so long, it can cause more harm to the economy of that country.

That war is a purely destructive process, no one argues. But there is a more important indicator - the conclusions and reaction.
In technical terms, it is not so much the errors in the system that are critical as the lack of reaction of the system to these errors.
I.e. it is very important - what will be the reaction of the world, in order to prevent the recurrence of similar problems in the future. Because in addition to the huge number of human casualties and destruction of entire regions in Ukraine, this war has created real global problems in the world economy. It is true that this is already a topic of economic terrorism, but the world must develop solutions against it as well.

When there is a war, obviously there is something they want to conquer, and when the one they want to conquer calms down or fights, that's when misunderstandings will begin and chaos will follow.

So the impact of this war is really not good. The worst is for the nearby countries; even the faraway countries from the scene of the war will also be affected for sure. Just like our country, even though we are far away, we feel the bad impact.

Not really war... but sanctions! Sanctions have caused issues and continue affecting global economy in the most negative way. Only people with room temperature IQ still believe that sanctions actually cause any significant effect on Russia and will stop Putin.   

They also thought the same in the USSR, puffing up their cheeks and talking from all sockets about the "decay of the West" and the collapse of imperialism tomorrow. And they explained the same way - a strong economy, a powerful ruler and the Central Committee of the CPSU. The whole world envies the USSR. 40% of resources are in the USSR. The people and the party are united !...
Shall I tell you how this show ended? I personally watched it inside the USSR.  In this case, even I will declare - the USSR economy was more self-sufficient, it produced, albeit not very high quality but a very wide range. Science, education (poor, but massively), factories and plants even worked. And what is modern Russia? A pathetic parody of the USSR. The USSR degraded much slower than the Russian Federation. So don't tell me tales about the USSR and Russia :)

the sides who wanted war are not Countries but Capitalists, the ones who can have benefits from it. no country can have benefits from war, even countries those are not involved in war will experience losses from other's war, because there are possibilities that a countries need some products form a country that involved in war.

This is why war can disrupt global economic where some capitalists take advantages form it. for example, Capitalist can play the price of products that are needed the most by countries who import those products from countries that involved in war who cant export the products anymore.

War is something that can crash any economy to zero just like we have been seeing with Ukraine. Russia economy is still stable compared to the Ukrainian economy that would need a lot of aids to get to her feet. The consequences of war is very disasterous and we should never pray for that.

The people that are living in Ukraine peacefully have left there country for another country especially the women so they can safeguard there lives. War is evil and if we become decieved and we do not plan on how to help ourselves to grow and live in harmony,the opposite might be the case.

As a resident of Ukraine, I disagree with you.
Yes, Ukraine is a complicated country. Terrorist power of russia, occupied a part of Ukraine, and also destroyed several areas that were industrial, as well as agrarian. But with all this - in Ukraine the economy is WORKING, taxes are being paid, business is adapting to the situation. For example, many agricultural companies have changed their locations and moved production to other regions that were not affected by Russian terrorism. As an indicator - in Ukraine in 2023 prices for fruits, vegetables, meat decreased. The exchange rate of the national currency, until September 2023 adhered to the restrictions, but since September the rate of the Ukrainian hryvnia was released and... the rate of major currencies even decreased (dollar, euro).
Regarding the migration of the population - yes, in February-March 2022, a noticeable part of the population left Ukraine. Now the process has gone in the opposite direction - many people who were forced to leave Ukraine are returning.
Regarding the stability of the Russian economy - I would not be so optimistic if I were you, it is enough to look at Russian news, financial indicators, and severe cuts in budgets for population and development. So the picture is not as sad as you have painted :)
Yes, rebuilding Ukraine will take a long time and require a lot of money. But already today, the world, understanding how the war will end, is beginning to agree on projects to rebuild Ukraine, signing contracts, beginning to develop programs.

everything you say is true, the effects of war are very bad for the economy, and if we look at the past, in fact the severe effects of war are not much different from the effects of the previous Covid 19 pandemic, purchasing power decreases, and economic uncertainty increases but it is different from a pandemic yesterday, if in yesterday's pandemic shares of health products increased during the war, it is likely that shares of basic material products such as oil, vehicles and weapons would increase drastically, this is all because of delays in supply and also increased demand.  War will always have bad effects on the economy and also the psychology of many people.

But we can't discard the other fact that some countries can take advantage of this terrible situation.
Like those who have the oil such as Middle East, weapons from US & Russia, and other war requirements.
So for those countries mentioned, they have the edge on this situation. But for the country which is directly involved with the war,
their people alone have physical suffering, fatalities and more. Definitely, their economy is greatly influenced by war.

From several wars that have occurred, we can see and research well that this occurred due to the interests of a group of parties who deliberately created this so that they could control territory or something they wanted. Although this can indeed have an impact on many other countries because when war continues without a ceasefire, valuable goods such as oil will often increase so this can have quite an impact on all countries that generally always consume petroleum.

Apart from that, warring countries will often find fault with their opponents which means that the marketing of products from the opposing countries will be disrupted. This is caused by several factors in real life, such as boycotting products from countries that are considered wrong, so that the economies of many companies that already have many best-selling products can also go bankrupt because of this. Even though weapons manufacturing companies will always applaud when war continues, the destruction caused by war will also be quite detrimental to the governments involved in the war.

1. Increase in the national GDP is least likely to be caused by a war.
This fact is so true because the impact of of war on a country is always on the Negative side. Because war affects the country at large directly, both the government and the citizens, these effects my include damaging of the country's infrastructures, making the government to spend unnecessarily in the defence sector, destruction of lives and properties, amongst others, so saying that war increases the national GDP of a country is 100% fact and true.


2. Oil is considered the most crucial resource in modern warfare.
This statement can also be considered to be true. Because oil is very important to every country, including in a time of war because oil is important and needed to power certain war machines and other important purposes too, although there are other important resources too that can play an active role in a time of war so I won't completely say that oil is the most crucial, but it is indeed very crucial.

3. War affects the stock market by causing a decline in stock prices.
I'll also agree with this fact, because war and conflict has a very important role to play when it comes to the stock market, this is because the market becomes it will eventually scare of investors who had intentions of investing in the countries financial market, and even those who are already investing, I mean who wants to be buying stocks and investing in a country experiencing war, business will certainly not go on as normal as the level of insecurity increases. Investors will for sure wish to move their investment to much secure and active location. So the statement is 100% true.

Yes, you are absolutely right. If we see Russia Ukraine war then we can see its impact on global economy. Ukraine is the Europe's largest country by land area entirely in Europe and it plays a crucial role in global trade. Europe is called the bread basket of the Europe because it is highly fertile soil. Ukraine is the world's 5th largest exporter of the wheat, 4th largest exporter of corn and barley. It also top exporter of the seed oil but cause of this war world is facing problems as Russia faces sever internationals sanctions for its invasion and as a result shortage and higher prices in key sectors are likely to be felt all over the world.

 

In preparation for the invasion of Ukraine, Russia had already planned in advance to steal Ukrainian grain reserves and create an artificial food problem for the residents of Ukraine.

When Russian tanks crossed the Ukrainian border on February 24, 2022, they deliberately targeted grain-rich areas and food production infrastructure, according to a new report from global human rights law firm Global Rights Compliance (GRC).

GRC discovered that the Russian defense contractor began purchasing grain trucks, as well as three new 170-meter bulk carriers, as early as December 2021. This indicates a plan to steal Ukrainian food “on an unprecedented scale.” Russia began seizing Ukrainian farms less than a week after the invasion and at its peak was exporting 12,000 tons of grain daily from all occupied territories. The market value of grain stolen in Ukraine is about $1 billion a year. According to GRC, many private Ukrainian grain companies were forcibly included in the Russian state operator.
In this regard, Russian dictator Putin may receive another warrant for his arrest from the International Criminal Court in The Hague.

According to The Independent, due to the war that broke out in Ukraine, Russia caused a global food crisis that affected millions of people, since before the war Ukraine was the world's largest producer of wheat.

https://tsn.ua/ru/svit/planirovali-golod-v-ukraine-putin-mozhet-poluchit-novyy-order-na-arest-ot-gaagi-2451979.html

And not just grain. In general, RASHIZM itself is an ideology of murderers, thieves and looters. They have been proving this "successfully" since the Soviet era.

In addition to grain, plundering of territories, looting of private apartments and houses, the terrorist country has stolen entire factories in Ukraine! There are many reasons for this, but one of the main ones is Russia's backwardness in some areas of industry and high dependence on imported components.

Here is a small list of what Russia has destroyed and stolen:

Luhansk Electromachinery Plant. Condition: stolen for scrap metal, part of the equipment was taken to Russia
Luhansk Machine-Building Plant (Luhansk Machine-Builder-43) Status: destroyed, equipment taken to Russia.
Stakhanov Ferroalloy Plant Status: militants' base on the territory. Part of the equipment was taken to Russia, cut into scrap metal and melted down at the Alchevsk Iron and Steel Works;
Stakhanov Carriage Works Status: on the territory of militants' base, equipment taken to Russia.
Yasynuvata Machine-Building Plant Status: destroyed, equipment taken to Russia.
Topaz Holding Company Status: fortified area, militants' base, all equipment taken to Russia.
Lutuhyne Research and Production Rolling Plant Status: plant destroyed, equipment taken to Russia.
Luhansk Cartridge Plant Status: terrorists' equipment repair base, deployment point, all equipment taken to Russia.
Machine-building plant "100"[1] Status: 90% of the equipment has been taken to Russia, a militant base.
Yunist plant Krasnodon-Luhansk Status: militants' base, equipment completely removed to Russia.
Luhansk Chemical and Pharmaceutical Plant[2] Status: the plant was destroyed, equipment was taken to Russia.
Luhansk plant of heat engineering equipment[3] Status: the plant was destroyed, the equipment was taken to Russia
Luhansk Automobile Valve Plant[4] Condition: stolen, cut into scrap metal
Luhansk Automobile Radiator Plant Condition: looted, cut into scrap metal
Khartsyzsk Machine-Building Plant Status: plant destroyed, equipment exported to Russia
"LugaTerm Condition: stolen for scrap metal, part of the equipment exported to Russia
Donets State Enterprise is known for its technology for growing crystals for the microelectronics industry. Status: exported to Russia;
Polypak enterprise Status: exported to Russia;
Marshal Plant Condition: taken to Russia, the plant has a repair base and artillery parking lot;
Luhansk Pipe Rolling Plant Status: production has been halted, the plant is being cut for scrap metal;
Vtorchermet Plant Status: completely sawn up for scrap;
Bryansk Ore Repair Plant (in the town of Bryanka) Status: completely sawn up for scrap;
Chornukhino traction rolling stock depot (the so-called "car depot") Condition: cut up for scrap metal (including railcars and access roads);
Luhansk Foundry and Mechanical Plant Condition: cut into scrap metal
Rolled metal products plant "ProkatService" Condition: the plant was destroyed and the equipment was taken to Russia.
Autoclave plant Condition: stolen, cut into scrap metal
Luhansk Aircraft Repair Plant Status: taken to Russia;

USSR didn't collapse because of sanctions. You can look it up anywhere you like. I guess that is the reason why you're not mentioning the source?

The real reason USSR collapsed was Mikhail Gorbachev. I'm not sure if he was a CIA agent or just was paid to do what he did but he was the real reason USSR collapsed. Yes, in some parts of USSR (like the Baltic States) strong national movements existed. But not in Ukraine, Belarus etc. where the politicians let alone most common folks didn't want independence from Russia and didn't know what to do with it. Both Kravchuk and Shushkevich were shocked when they heard it for the first time as they only came to Belavezhskaya Pushcha to sign new agreements on gas deliveries to the republics, Yeltsin granting independence to their countries came out of the blue. What economic sanctions have to do with it?

Ok, let's assume you're right ! :)
Then 3 questions:
1. When were sanctions imposed against the USSR ? And how did they affect the economy ? And a couple of words about the general standard of living of the USSR population, economy ?
2. What steps specifically aimed at the collapse of the USSR did Gorbachev take. Provided that he initiated reforms aimed at economic acceleration, glasnost and democratization of state and socio-political life. Aimed at improving the lives of the population after a prolonged economic downturn.
3. what do you say about the fact that Gorbachev tried to preserve the USSR, and these attempts were "annulled" by the election of Boris Yeltsin on May 29, 1990, which put an end to the process of the collapse of the USSR ?

Only plz facts, because here it will not be possible to push fantasies, because I lived at that time, and observed the processes from inside the USSR :)

I'll just leave it here - it's an assessment of the problems of the USSR before it collapsed:

- declining rates of economic growth;
- chronic shortages of food and consumer goods;
- the growing scientific and technical lag of the USSR from Western countries;
- exhaustion of the possibilities of extensive economy;

Did Gorbachev do all this? :)


PS And this is for study: https://tass.ru/ekonomika/13140823

I think it's true that world war will not only have an impact on stocks, even crypto and gold will also have a very big impact and currencies in certain countries will also be affected, I think and oil could be the most important resource, even the price of oil can become very expensive in some countries. What do you think, I'm just saying what's in my head, correct me if I'm wrong, give me your opinion about this, is there a positive impact?

OMG, you're hilarious!  ;D I don't even have to respond because you're debunking your own lies literally!  ;D

Neither your "assessment of problems" list nor the article you mentioned (at least Google translated version) doesn't contain any mention of Western sanctions being the reason of USSR collapsing. It reminds me of police reading you your rights to not testify against yourself but you're still self-incriminating  ;D  Tell me, are you retarded?

I can't even add anything, you've done it all yourself.... sanctions don't work!  ;D

Anyways, you still have time to join the military and go meet your heroic compatriots in the eastern front. I know you're too cowardly to do it, right?

World War has negative impact on countries because there is not a single country which is completely independent therefore for anything which is not present in their country they continue the process of import and export to offer each facility to their citizens. The price of certain things increases because that are not present in a country and from outside the country when war persist then it is not possible to carry out import and export.

Oil and other energy cost can be greatly enhance due to global war but in my perspective crypto is totally unaffected with war because bitcoin price remains at the same position but instead any harmful effect on bitcoin the price of it is increasing continuously. The effect on bitcoin is only due to rumours as well supply and demand but wars have no effect on crypto market at all.

War is a disaster that should never be resorted to. It is a costly and destructive path that leads to suffering and long-lasting scars. The ongoing conflict in Ukraine is a tragic example of the human cost of war. Millions of people have been displaced from their homes, their lives turned upside down. Cities and infrastructure have been ravaged causing economic hardship and hindering humanitarian efforts.

The psychological trauma of war will continue to affect people and communities for years. We must never forget that war is a last resort, not a solution. Diplomacy and dialogue are the only paths to resolving conflicts peacefully and building a brighter future for all.

Of course, I knew that the intellect and you are two parallel lines :) But I didn’t think that you were also far from each other, that even the shadow of the intellect did not fall on you :)

Well, ok, it’s not difficult for me, I’ll explain.
There are words written there that are incomprehensible to you:
- decrease in economic growth rates;
- chronic shortage of food and consumer goods;
- the growing scientific and technical lag of the USSR from Western countries;
- exhaustion of the possibilities of the extensive economy;

This means:
- in the USSR they could no longer support the economy due to its degradation
- the economy of the USSR during this period became so weak that the economy of the BIGGEST COUNTRY in the world, with 40% of all earth resources, could not even provide its residents with food!
- due to the impossibility of receiving technology from the West, the USSR could not produce high-tech goods, because its own economy was weak, and “every day” it was getting weaker.
- but this one will be difficult. The word “extensive economy” has clearly broken the remains of your gray matter :) But I always help the weaker, and even the intellectually weak like you :) I will teach you this word. An extensive economy means that the economy is built through new construction, the development of new lands, the use of untouched natural resources, an increase in the number of workers, etc.

Now strain your first vertical brain gyrus and draw a conclusion - if before the sanctions there were no such problems, but after the sanctions they appeared - what was the consequence of such problems, or significantly influenced their appearance? I'm waiting for an interesting answer from your vertical brain gyrus?! ;D ;D ;D

Of course, I knew that the intellect and you are two parallel lines :) But I didn’t think that you were also far from each other, that even the shadow of the intellect did not fall on you :)

Well, ok, it’s not difficult for me, I’ll explain.
There are words written there that are incomprehensible to you:
- decrease in economic growth rates;
- chronic shortage of food and consumer goods;
- the growing scientific and technical lag of the USSR from Western countries;
- exhaustion of the possibilities of the extensive economy;

This means:
- in the USSR they could no longer support the economy due to its degradation
- the economy of the USSR during this period became so weak that the economy of the BIGGEST COUNTRY in the world, with 40% of all earth resources, could not even provide its residents with food!
- due to the impossibility of receiving technology from the West, the USSR could not produce high-tech goods, because its own economy was weak, and “every day” it was getting weaker.
- but this one will be difficult. The word “extensive economy” has clearly broken the remains of your gray matter :) But I always help the weaker, and even the intellectually weak like you :) I will teach you this word. An extensive economy means that the economy is built through new construction, the development of new lands, the use of untouched natural resources, an increase in the number of workers, etc.

Now strain your first vertical gyrus and draw a conclusion - if before the sanctions there were no such problems, but after the sanctions they appeared - what was the consequence of such problems, or significantly influenced their appearance? I'm waiting for an interesting answer from your vertical gyrus?!

PS I sincerely hope that you understand what a “brain gyrus” is! Although...  ;D

Damn, you're so retarded you pasted your post contents twice!  ;D

Anyway, all this doesn't have anything to do with sanctions. All consequences you have mentioned were in fact caused by highly ineffective and poorly managed planned economy of USSR. But even then USSR could have easily continued to exist. If only the US wouldn't have paid Gorbachev, Yeltsin and national movements in the republics to destroy it. Anyone with at least room temperature IQ understands this.

of course there will be an impact from the war itself, but in general it will definitely be on the economy where economic activity will be indirectly hampered whether it is export or import goods in one country, even domestic trade will be very bad because of the lack of supply, because of this all prices will go up and there won't even be any stock.
Apart from economics, it is a humanitarian problem, where there will be many civilians and children who will become victims
I hope that in this world no one will wage war again and that countries that are at war will soon be at peace

true, global economy also impacted with the changing landscapes, diplomacy should always be the best way to discuss problems about dispute in the border, etc but many countries just instead outright trying to take the most destructive path ever that is the war, I personally would prefer the world to be in peace, where there's no human would be sacrificed in the war but alas it seems thats quite hard to implement.
because sometime with diplomacy they'd meet dead end which later then caused the aggression.
but seeing the overall economic globally, it further increase the fluctuation rate which might be worrying for some people with minimum wage because their purchasing power is plummeting.

Everyone has the same hopes. The victims were mostly civilians, children and women.

It's quite sad to have to lose parents and parents to lose their beloved children. It's true, the war also resulted in a shortage of food supplies, even though a lot of aid came, it was definitely not evenly distributed and business activities were also disrupted.

The saddest thing right now is what is happening in Middle East right now. I also hope that this conflict will be resolved quickly and find a good middle ground.
     

As long as there are leaders who are selfish and have no shame in anything, war will always exist in this world because the purpose of war is to slaughter each other, not to make peace. So I also hope that in the future there will be no more leaders of any country who feel selfish and feel more powerful so that it could cause another prolonged war in certain regions.

Everyone can see what happened to European countries that were involved in war and also see what happened to countries in the Middle East as a result of war. Almost all infrastructure destruction occurs through war, so it is appropriate for all leaders to open their eyes to set the intention to make peace so that any destruction can be stopped well.

You are right, the impact of war involves various aspects, as you mentioned, and food does play a key role in determining the success or failure of a conflict. Apart from that, war also leaves scars that are difficult to recover from, both in terms of physical damage and psychological impacts on the people involved.

Oil is the main key to a country. If war occurs, those who have a lot of oil resources and supplies will be in power and can control the market.
I think the country's economy will improve because of that, maybe it will affect other sectors but in that area they are superior.

I would be really surprised if you had any reasoned answer except primitive, habitual stupid insults, and repeated repetition of convenient mantras :)

You can think whatever you want, deny causality, deny real processes, but you won't become smarter, but you will look as stupid and primitive :)

PS And here is a question for you, probably the last one, it is interesting purely from the point of view of psychiatry and your logical health - the economy of the USSR with high oil prices and the ability to sell it, worked not badly and even had a time called "the golden age of the USSR", collapsed in a little more than 10 years, exactly after the embargo was introduced, and at the same time oil prices fell. You really don't see any connection ? :)
I think that if you stick your finger in the socket, you will be electrocuted, the electricity suppliers will be to blame, because they sent it to your socket incorrectly, and electric current should not harm your body !??  Well, live in your illusory world, amuse people with your morbid fantasies further :)


But back to the topic, as always the list of the next "achievements of the great economy of russia" :)
- The number of Russians who received residence permits and foreign citizenship doubled over the year
- Courts received more than 4,000 cases of escape from military units after the start of mobilization
- Law enforcers raided a Wildberries warehouse in the Moscow region to hand out summonses to the military recruitment center. "There are no losses, everything is going according to plans" :)
- Cyprus began blocking Chinese cards of Russian banks
- Moscow dropped out of the top 50 leading scientific centers of the world
- In Samara, students were asked to give up e-cigarettes for chips for drones. World's second army, great economy :)))))
- Cars in Russia have gone up in price almost 1.5 times in a year
- Announced by Rostec as a "completely in-house development, having no analogues in the world", the anti-drone complex was found on free sale on Aliexpress.... it has been sold by a Chinese company for a long time :)
- Gas in Europe gets cheaper amid strong supply, high inventory levels
- Finland closed all border crossings with Russia except one..... in the Arctic ! Subtle Finnish humor :)
- Bananas in Russia have risen in price to a record high since 2000 due to the devaluation of the ruble
- Russian authorities refused to pay for cancer drugs for Russians to save money for war ...
- Moscow's budget has a 1.1 trillion ruble hole in it

And a bit from critical psychiatry, the patient is again giving out "masterpieces" :) "Putin accused Western artificial intelligence of Russophobia and demanded to invent a Russian one with "traditional values"""

War can never be totally get rid of as long as we have leaders who are on seat of power for personal purposes rather than people they're representing. Too much of Greed, ambition and desire for power are the reasons pushing our leaders to make decisions that lead to war. In the worst cases, some of these leaders are willing to sacrifice the lives and well being of their own people in order to achieve their own personal goals forgetting that the costs of war is very devastating and it'snot  not limited to the immediate loss of life or physical destruction alone. Just as the tittle of this thread, war can have long lasting economic and social consequences that can prevent a country from developing and improving the lives of its people. Unfortunately, our leaders nowadays don't see war as something big because the lives of the citizens are valueless to them and the war has less effect on them physically.

    War has an effect on the economy of the area it occurred which is the major reason why it's avoided at high cost. We may not understand the depth of dangerous effects it poses till we experience it but it's really not what we should anticipate. Lives will be lost, there'll be halt in economic activities, so many inter national relationships will be on Sandy ground because there'll be breakouts and fall outs.
    The economy of the nation will be fueled into the war and the citizens will be left to make do with what they own and have in their store for the period it'll last. Living will be difficult and be in jeopardy, fear will set in all because of unpredictable occurrences. The well-being of the people will be put secondary because the major goal will be conquering the war. It's no doubt going to be an unhealthy experience so as a nation, we should do all that's possible to avoid such happening.

War has actuallly caused more harm that Good In every Nation that has experienced It ,the impact is So crucial such that It can reduce the economic activities of a country as well a as cause deflation or inflation which can result to economic crisis . War as the name implies had remained a unique threat to every country because It affects them demographically as a result death.

Generally , no country wants war or conflicts irrespective of How strong they are because it can cause The following
1.reduction in population
2.loss of property
3.economic crisis
4.inflation
5.increase in death rates  And So many others .
Therefore , Its quite Advisable To avoid war rather than To accept It because Its impacts can be harmful than helpful.

War is indeed a scourge that makes the profitable risk is severe, dismembering trade, destroying  structure, and diverting coffers down from essential requirements. The profitable impact of war extends far beyond the actual immediate conflict zone. It ripples throughout global impact, causing insecurity and query that can have lasting goods. The recent conflict in Ukraine, has transferred energy prices soaring, disintegrated force chains, and contributed to rising affectation worldwide.

It essentially needs to seek peaceful resolutions to conflicts and strengthen transnational institutions that promote dialogue and cooperation, given the  ruinous consequences of war. The citizens always suffer the most impact directly and indirectly. The pursuit of peace isn't just a moral imperative, but also an  profitable and strategic necessity.

Civilians will become sacrifices for self-interested leaders, with war of course there must be a profit commensurate with the costs incurred. Sometimes human greed overrides humanity, so that in the end a peaceful life is difficult for the people to obtain. For those who lose, of course they will suffer even more as if the world is unfair to them, especially since they have lost their beloved brother

Parties to a conflict can always read the worst impacts if a conflict occurs, namely the high risk of loss of civilian lives. However, what is interesting here is that if a country wants to be safe from threats from outside, it needs a strong military force and if at any time a conflict occurs then this needs to be done immediately as an action whose negative impact is smaller than other potential dangers that will arise by the opposing party.

This statement is true, it's just that having a strong military force without a good sense of humanity, in my opinion, all of this will be in vain because a prolonged conflict begins with greed without paying attention to humanity.

a country wouldn't be able to have a strong military force if they are sanctioned financially that's why it's necessary for countries who dominate to make those countries poor so they can't fight back. and for that to happen they enforce political intervention in those poor countries.

humanity will be ignored when existential threats are high. israel for example will not stop especially now that they are into deep in this situation for if they do stop, they will also perish. now compare it to other countries at war this time because they are all in such situation.

The devastating impact of war on a nation's economy is a stark reminder of the interconnectedness of human society and the fragility of economic systems. War disrupts the delicate balance of production, consumption, and trade, leaving a trail of destruction and destabilization in its wake.

One of the most immediate and severe consequences of war is the disruption of trade networks. Supply chains are severed, transportation routes become impassable, and international markets are thrown into disarray. This disruption leads to shortages of essential goods, including food, medicine, and fuel, driving up prices and exacerbating existing hardships.

Inflation, the persistent increase in the general price level of goods and services, becomes a rampant problem in war-torn economies. As governments resort to deficit spending to finance their war efforts, the money supply expands, leading to a decline in the purchasing power of currency. This erosion of purchasing power further exacerbates the plight of ordinary citizens, who struggle to afford basic necessities.

If we apply your statements to the Russian war that it unleashed on the territory of Ukraine, then the owners of oil companies in Russia should now have large profits. But this is far from what happens in reality.

Firstly, international sanctions have been imposed on the Russian oil and gas industry, which limit both the volume of sales of oil and its refined products and the price at which they are sold. As a result, oil and gas production in Russia is declining.

Secondly, this war is entering its logical next stage, when dozens of Ukrainian drones periodically launch attacks on oil refineries and oil depots already on Russian territory. Because of this, the size of losses increases greatly. It is unlikely that Russia's war in this case will improve its economy. Rather, on the contrary, the war and the subsequent international isolation will set Russia back in economic development for many decades.

Oh, colonel, that's huge progress, you finally found courage to admit that AFU is bombing Russian civilian targets. They do attack, but what damage do they do? Are they able to reach and hit those targets?

Such attacks can't affect the outcome of this war. Ukraine keeps losing it's people, losing it's territory. Russia is winning.

And btw, some news regarding gas exports from the US:


Source: https://www.euronews.com/business/2024/02/02/what-us-president-bidens-lng-freeze-might-mean-for-europe

What it actually means is that the US can stop LNG export any time for any reason they like (like strategic considerations or similar). Sorry guys, nothing personal, just business.  ;D ;D ;D

Ukraine continues to destroy military installations on Russian territory, and has also begun to destroy dual-use facilities that contribute to the increase in Russian military power in its quest to conquer Ukraine.

Oil refineries and fuel tanks on Russian territory are legitimate targets for Ukraine, since oil is the export of oil - the main source of revenue for the Russian budget, covering the costs of a full-scale war in Ukraine. In addition, it is fuel for Russian military equipment. In my post, I wrote that the war is entering another stage, the stage of its transfer to Russian territory. Previously, Ukraine had limited opportunities to do this, since the allies did not allow the allies to attack the territory of the Russian Federation with the weapons provided, and there were very few of their own in Ukraine. This year, Ukraine is going to produce at least a million drones; mass serial production of high-precision long-range missiles that will reach both Moscow and the Urals is being established.

Since the beginning of 2024 alone, Ukrainian drones have attacked seven oil refineries in the Russian Federation. Thus, on January 9, in the Russian city of Orel, drones attacked a fuel and energy complex.

On the night of January 18, Ukrainian drones attacked the St. Petersburg oil terminal.

On January 19, the oil depot in the city of Klintsy, Bryansk region, was unlucky. Oil tanks at the facility caught fire.
On January 20, loud explosions were heard again at the same tank farm. The oil depot burned for two days in a row.

On the night of January 21, the Novatek fuel plant closed due to a drone attack on the sea terminal in Ust-Luga, Leningrad Region. This plant processed fuel for the Russian Armed Forces. After the SBU attack, all tankers located at the terminal moved far out to sea.

After the fire on January 25, the largest oil refinery in Tuapse, a city in the Krasnodar Territory and a major port on the Black Sea coast, was paralyzed due to a strike by Ukrainian drones. This plant annually processes up to 9 million tons of raw materials and is among the top 10 largest in the Russian Federation.

On the night of February 3, the Lukoil oil refinery in the Volgograd region was attacked. The drone hit the primary oil refining plant producing ELOU-AVT-5 fuel.

Based on the results of the first month of 2024, Russian oil companies reduced gasoline exports abroad by 37%. Sales of diesel fuel, the largest export of petroleum products, fell 23%. The Ministry of Energy of the Russian Federation explained that the reduction in exports was a consequence of “unscheduled repairs” at oil refineries and the need to supply the domestic market. In the future, such “unscheduled repairs” should become more frequent and scaled up. Russia wanted war, it will get it.

We all know

Ukrain did not reconquer and surely it is a struggle.
I wonder how many of the foreign helpers are still alive? Any input on that? 

If you mean how many foreign citizens are participating in the war on the side of Ukraine, then it is known that after the full-scale invasion of the Russian army into Ukraine in February 2022, about 20 thousand citizens from 55 countries joined the International Legion under the Ukrainian Armed Forces at the beginning of this war. How many foreigners are still fighting in Ukraine a year later is a question to which hardly anyone today can give a definite answer. Some experts put the figure at 3 thousand people, others - even less. This is due to the fact that when such volunteers got to the front, and the situation there was very different from what they had seen before, it brought more problems than good. Since then, the Ukrainian authorities have tightened the rules for admitting foreigners.

In general, foreign fighters appeared in Ukraine long before the start of full-scale Russian aggression. Some people from neighboring countries joined the fight against pro-Russian separatists at the beginning of the war in Donbass in 2014. Among them were many Georgians who formed the Georgian National Legion. Now this is the largest foreign unit in the ranks of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

In 2014, Belarusians also appeared in Donbass. Now two units are fighting for Ukraine at once - the Pagonya regiment and the Kastus Kalinovsky regiment. The commander of the Kalinovsky regiment says that without a free Ukraine there will be no free Belarus - from the Lukashenko regime.

Another large international structure is the “Freedom of Russia” legion, which was initially formed by officers and soldiers of the Russian army who went over to the side of Ukraine. According to the command, the number of this unit is constantly growing.

Other foreign volunteer units within the Armed Forces of Ukraine are the battalions named after Khamzat Gelayev, Dzhokhar Dudayev, Sheikh Mansur and the Ministry of Defense of the Chechen Republic of Ichkeria (formed by anti-Putin and anti-Kadyrov Chechens), the Normandy Brigade (consisting of Canadian retired military personnel), the Canadian-Ukrainian battalion (uniting representatives of the Ukrainian diaspora in Canada) and a number of others.

https://ru.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%98%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8 %D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B9_%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B3%D0%B8%D0 %BE%D0%BD_%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B0%D0%BB %D1%8C%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B9_%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%8B_%D0%A3%D0 %BA%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%8B

https://www.golosameriki.com/a/ukraine-army-foreigners/6973501.html

Meanwhile oil resources is greatly consumed in so many countries.Some countries depend wholly on other countries for their oil usage.when war occurs this way,the utilizations of weapons have increased and leads to shortage of oil.Hence,the price of oil begins to fluctuate and it becomes difficult for other countries to purchase and utilize oil for their day to day activities.

It seems like war, or other global world problems are created to influence the world economy, war can affect the economic development of certain countries whether they are involved or not, and other factors such as crises, epidemics, natural disasters, accidents, politics, and others.

In fact, all sectors are quite influential if war occurs and this will certainly be detrimental economically, politically or otherwise.
Economic growth will decline drastically because of war and a lot of infrastructure is likely to be damaged as a result of war, so it will hinder economic growth and for countries that are not affected by war, it will certainly have a big impact because of hampered exports or imports.

That depends, if your country is a war profiteering nation like US, UK and Germany then you're likely going to see an increase in your national GDP but if your country is the warzone, it's probably a likely thing that your GDP won't be that huge.
That depends, say for example in a war torn country that has the largest factory of a particular company and the factory of that company was a casualty to the war, I think that could be a case that the stock price of that particular company or if they've got a really big customer/consumer base in a war torn country then probably we would see the same thing too but if they don't have those, I don't think war affects a stock price that much.

Thanks a lot :)

that's right. I think the impact is even bigger than that. but the most important thing I think is the economy, especially in terms of food. in war food remains the main source of human energy. if there is a war of course its circulation will be very difficult. I think this is the main problem that is more serious than anything else from the war.

During the war, I don't think that the first thing to consider should be the economy; the life of the people and their safety should be the highest priority of the government, all the government cared about at that time was how to beat their brother country, And the economy is like a country's business, and other countries, such as the UN, must come to the people's aid, yet despite all of this, our nations continue to turn a deaf ear. People become hungry since it will be considerably more difficult to gain access to your home and all of the assets it contains.  because even with the aid it would still get to everybody, and they might not get efficient people to voluntarily participate, and that is why you just have to hope to be among the lucky people during war.

True. Though number 2 is a fact and not an impact of war. Oil even promotes war due to its importance. Some other impacts I can think of include that war hinders the flow of goods and services which has its role to play on global economy. War also bring about debt because funding war is expensive and most time it’s expensive than a government can afford (all of the ammunitions and machinery used), so they are forced to borrow. And war is really disastrous to economies because it destroys everything and is sometimes a fresh start.

Yes, maybe the impact of war on the global economy indeed gives concerns about the stability of the global economy and produces significant effects on finance. This condition will also lead to worries whose threat of protectionism will potentially damage the open global trade system. This trade war will have an impact on several economic and financial market sectors, maybe among:
   1. Global economic growth.
This trade war has had a significant impact on global economic growth. Such as the decline in international trade and economic uncertainty that has hampered business investment in investment so that the slowing global economic growth.
   2. Uncertainty of supply chain.
This war will create uncertainty in this case. Which might also affect the economic sector and financial markets that exist throughout the world.
   3. Regional Economic Stability: A trade war between the US and China has also led to regional economic stability with several countries so as to consider strategies and search for other alternative markets.
The impact of this trade war has also exceeded which is detrimental to the economy directly. And increase uncertainty in the political economic politics that interfere with open global trade. Therefore, a broader collaboration effort is needed to be able to resolve this conflict, and can develop long -term and sustainable solutions to the global economy going forward.

Wars put a stop to everything. Any advances in economic, technological and infrastructural development would be lost. A country having entered a full blown war with an equally formidable opponent would prioritize the need to crush their enemies and win the war than how the economy is faring. The sooner the war is over, the sooner growth and progress can again resume.

You would be really lucky if a country in an all out war manages to grow enough food to even consider circulating.
Food products normally imported would decrease to the barest minimum or even stopped as funds would be diverted to the war efforts. So I think ending the war would be more serious.

War is chaos, no matter who's involved in it. As long as they lose something—lives, food, oil, or any resources—there will be no winner. War is the only end point of a conversation in a country if they can't come up with an argument, but they are not thinking about their citizens, even their own country. No matter what war they do and how they defeat another country, they still can't be considered a winner as they still lose something. Not just food, but more valuable than that is human life. We don't know why some leaders of a country will engage in or result in this kind of event; what would they achieve from it, dominance? Power? All of that will be meaningless if they lose all they have, including the lives of their citizens. Instead of protecting their citizens by not engaging in a war, they still engage as part of their ego.

Right now a silent wealth redistribution is taking place and I am quite happy with that. Countries such as India and China are getting Russian hydrocarbons at a discount, and they are able to earn good profits by re-selling refined products to Europe. Also cheap Russian crude oil has lowered benchmark oil prices by quite a bit. It is good that Europeans are paying a premium, since they can afford it. I hope that this situation will continue for another 5-10 years, or until when EVs are able to fully replace gasoline and diesel driven vehicles.

Not surprising news, but thought oil and other resources "transferring economy", would start exchanging for food later. I guess the collapse of the Russian economy is accelerating :)
So the news: Russia has started exchanging oil for Indian bananas.
Russian authorities are launching a "banana scheme" to solve the problem of trade imbalance with India, which has increased its oil purchases from Russia 11 times since the war began, but has not launched a reciprocal flow of goods to the Russian market.

Beautiful game of India and China, by this raw material appendage :)

PS have you laughed already ? You think that's all ? NO !  ;D

"State Duma deputy Gavrilov called for exchanging oil for flowers from Kenya and Colombia. State Duma deputy from the CPRF faction Sergei Gavrilov suggested exchanging Russian oil for tulips and other flowers from Kenya, Ecuador and Colombia. His words are quoted by RIA Novosti."
 

My little lying friend, why do you always lie? It's embarrassing, every word you post is a lie, literally every single word:


Source: https://www.barrons.com/news/russia-s-gdp-up-by-3-6-percent-in-2023-statistics-agency-403c0bc5


Meanwhile, Ukraine is losing this war, losing territory day by day, Avdiivka is about to fall it's already partly occupied by the Russians, they also entered Novomykhailivka recently, other locations on the frontline are equally alarming for AFU. What's more, AFU commander-in-chief Zaluzhny has been fired by president Zelensky for poor performance. Still willing to laugh?

^ not sure which media DrBeer is watching really but it's feeding him the wrong information.
the media has a very huge disconnection to reality, they don't even report what is going on to the farmers in EU and the farmers in Canada blocking their highways in protest to the lies being told to the public. they all wake up seeing the truth. 

i know it must be frustrating to watch Tucker's interview with Putin but at least the 70-year-old man knows exactly what he is talking about.  they are using rubles and yuan in their transactions, and their economies are fine.

Spot on my friend but I’d also like to add some other things that are also impacted by global wars, one of them is Environmental degradation that has to do with the surroundings affected by the wars most depending on the type of weapons used the soils and water of the surrounding war fields become toxic for plant and human lives making it unsuitable to grow food and also for people to live in such surroundings.
Another major impact is that wars lead to extreme poverty most sources of livelihoods are destroyed during wars causing the nation’s to plunge into extreme poverty which in turn also leads to food insecurity starvation and further malnutrition just to name a few.
Not to even talk about displacement many people loose their families and friends, cultures and also history during times like this leaving them with no past only a present and a future it’s a sickening tale one we should all try to prevent at all cost.

That is just part of several main things that can arise when war conditions begin to occur in a place. Because in general war can make the economy worse so that things such as foodstuffs and ready-to-use food are also affected by no longer being able to be supplied as they should. So these things were the first to experience bad influences apart from other things such as education and the development of the country's infrastructure which had not been completely repaired before the war occurred.

Apart from that, war itself can also destroy all agricultural land which can still be used as a basic source of food for local residents so that the food sector itself can suddenly experience paralysis if the war is still going on and never ends. Because farmers in war areas will definitely not be able to carry out their own activities as usual because they have to continue to protect themselves from war attacks, so this can really paralyze all economic sectors in a certain area.

There are many environmental impacts resulting from the war and it will be very difficult to recover and it will take a long time to be able to rebuild and this will be very detrimental to the people who live in that environment so they have to find a suitable place to live for them in a new place.

The destruction caused by war will indeed cause local people to lose their homes and have difficulty meeting nutritional needs in places of detention and many diseases suffered by those who are displaced due to war and this is truly a shame if war occurs in a country.

Wars lead to the economic and infrastructure deterioration of countries, leading to a decline in the prices of financial assets such as stocks, and an increase in the value of safe currencies such as gold and the Japanese yen. Wars greatly affect the foreign exchange (Forex) market, as currency rates can change suddenly. When a war breaks out in a region, investors become cautious and look for currencies that are considered safe
Affects markets and currencies
Affects monetary policy
Impact on international investment
Impact on emerging markets and their stability.
There is many others problems that can effect all the planet.

I don't care if the increase in the national GDP of some countries can be caused by war and that some stock prices can rise, war is bad. Period. Innocent people are suffering, kids are dying FFS. The fact that it can be profitable for some people is disgusting. Everybody knows that and yet here we are: a lot of terrible wars in the 21st century.

You have voiced a very subtle topic.
The point is that the GDP of a country that is actively at war may look good on the one hand, but on the other hand you have to realize that during a war the GDP generates products and services that do not create additional value for the economy. Take for example the terrorist country Russia - they claim that the economy is doing well, but in reality the economy is collapsing and the population is poor. Why ? Because about 40% of russia's budget goes to support the terrorist war - ammunition, shells, equipment, ammunition, payments to terrorists of the rf army...... And all this, after a very short time, turns into smoke, burned debris, corpses of their soldiers (and the loss of able-bodied population).  So the GDP of a country at war is not equal to the same GDP in peacetime !

In addition, war also caused the government to spend way more than its normal budget.  It also makes people suffer.  Transportation and logistic is also greatly affected so the distribution of trade is interrupted.  Continued war can result in famine, economic crash, destruction of properties and living things, and many more.  The only sectors that profit in this war are the weapon manufacturers and medical supplier.

Wars devastate, yes. There's more to food scarcity than missing meals. A damaged supply chain affects the economy and everyone's wallet. Farmers, traders, and consumers can't? They're left behind, prices soar, and purchasing power plummets. Wars freeze and reverse time. Education, healthcare, and innovation lose money for every bullet fired and field burned. And recovery? Economic revival is painful, not just rebuilding. This is about future prosperity, not simply survival. War is a luxury no nation can afford, as the economy shows

Because of the war, people are destroyed and material wealth is destroyed, that is, the economy of the warring state is actually destroyed. But war negatively affects not only the economies of the warring states, but also the economies of other states.

Take, for example, the current Russian attack on Ukraine. In Russia itself, the economy has been rebuilt on a war footing. Enterprises and factories that previously produced products to improve people's lives now produce tanks, missiles and missiles, which are designed to be destroyed on the battlefield and destroy others. European countries, fearing aggression against them, also stepped up the production of deadly products. Fortifications are being built on the borders. Defense spending has increased in every state's budget, sometimes to the detriment of public services and social assistance for low-income individuals.

Instead of directing efforts to improve living standards, space exploration, and so on, because of the half-smart idiot Putin, tens and hundreds of billions of dollars literally turn into fire, smoke and ashes, claiming hundreds of thousands of human lives.

I absolutely agree with what you said. To me it's a pity that all people around the world can't (or don't want) understand these simple things. War is bad for any economy of any country that is at war, and it is for the global economy too. Because, like you righly said, many things turn into smoke, burned debris, corpses of their soldiers etc.

As reality has shown - normal people who value life, development, progress - are against war. But there are regimes that set themselves absolutely inadequate goals and realize their complexes. And their own population, duped by propaganda, serves as a tool for this. Who not only kill and destroy other countries, they do not have human values, they go to suicide themselves, deprive their country of the future, deprive the future of their children and grandchildren .... The problem with the world is that it's playing tolerance with these regimes. If they had not been allowed to develop over the last 20 years, the world would be living without problems now. Such regimes are like cancer cells, if they are not identified and destroyed in time, they will metastasize and start destroying everything around them. People have the highest value - life, while these criminal regimes have the highest value - destruction and annihilation

Maybe I'm over-optimistic in thinking that the civilized world has finally realized that tolerating these regimes is not a joke and must be eradicated like cancer cells? Iran, Russia, North Korea, these countries have very good people inside, but their governments can't be tolerated any more, they must be destroyed the sooner the better. I really think that many people came to this conclusion today and that the days of these regimes are numbered.

I absolutely agree with you! In all these countries there are a sufficient number of adequate people who have become hostage to the situation. But I’m not saying “eradicate the population”, I’m talking about eradicating such REGIMES. But the West missed the time when this could be done almost painlessly and with minimal “side effects.” Rogue regimes, over DECADES of softness in the West, have accumulated strength and strengthened each other (such as what is happening now - Russia is supplying missile and nuclear technologies to Iran and North Korea in exchange for UAVs, missiles, shells, cartridges) for terror in Ukraine

It's a sure way to start a nuclear war you realize that? An attempt to attack any of these countries will result in a nuclear apocalypse. Any more suggestions?  ;D

The theory of terrorism is to make people suffer, the same theory goes for sanctions.
For terrorism there are no innocents on this planet. All who support the system are guilty.

Put these bastard regimes aside - we are GUARANTEED to get a sprawling cancerous tumor like the "Russian world", which even without nuclear weapons will destroy the civilized world, and make it, at best, a giant russia, northern correia, or similar bastard anti-human regime. Russia's threats of "nuclear dick" are just an attempt to intimidate the west, with the pathetic russian fuhrer knowing full well that once he gives the command he will be destroyed, which he is indescribably afraid of ! All tyrants are indescribably cowardly persons, it is an axiom !
Yes, what we must admit - tolerance, playing soft methods, and often corruption - allowed to give some time for such despicable regimes and gain strength. I am sure - the world has drawn conclusions, and the world's cancerous tumors will be isolated and bought. The world should live and develop, not fight and suffer !
The world economy cannot work only for war ! It is always easier to destroy, that is why such inadequate regimes choose the side of violence and destruction. To create is always more difficult !

This is starting to look like hysteria already. You're apparently losing it... Every sentence ends with an exclamation mark. Reading your pointless propaganda posts I imagine Hitler giving a speech in front of a huge crowd ;D Some "good" news from Donbas, probably? Don't worry, some more "good news" are coming: Chasiv Yar, Kramatorsk, Slavyansk. Wait for it... 

Anyway, what do you suggest? How do you imagine we can fight these "rogue countries"? Something we can really do, not just your verbal diarrhea.  ;D

For a resident of Russia, Hitler is obviously a respected type, after all, brother and ideologue of RASHISM :) I have long forgotten about this type, he was overshadowed by Adolf Putin ...

What are you so happy about? 10-30 square kilometers of total scorched land ? tens of thousands of rotting corpses of Russians on Ukrainian land, which nobody needs ? Tell me more about the A50, IL22, and 10 SU34/SU35/SU35S, on the ground in 10 days and the pilots of the remaining airplanes who are now forced to fly by threatening their families ! :) Is this the reason for your joy and pride ? :)

I reply to your only adequate suggestion for a solution - the solution is simple. Like any serious disease, it is necessary to systematically carry out "prevention" so that such regimes do not appear, and if such a "tumor" is found - destroy it until it does not metastasize like PMR, DNR, LNR, Abkhazia, .....
Such "soft" means include restriction of totalitarian and inadequate religious movements, education and development of the population (undeveloped, backward population is an ideal ground for building totalitarian regimes), economic education and economic development of countries and regions (poor population is also a fertile ground for inadequate regimes).
Also - reorganization of international institutions. At least the UN, the Red Cross and some others - completely discredited themselves, showed their unsuitability, and in some cases and diametrically opposite position to its purpose.

Well The EU is buying happily refabricated petrol products of India and other countries.
The embargo is not really doing what is was suppossed to do.

Undoubtedly what you say is true, I see no reason to disagree here. Because war conflict never brings anything good to anyone, only harm is done from here. A country's infrastructural degradation occurs only through war, and its impact spreads badly in the global market. We have seen through the war in Europe how the price of oil has gone up in the world market, how the stock market has suffered and even the price of everything has gone up. Due to the war conflict, the two countries spent a large part of their income on the military sector through which their economic condition was seriously threatened and the production of the country's domestic product was drastically reduced and destroyed by the war. In the current era of globalization, when one country is damaged, the entire world system chain is damaged.

War actually has a big impact on the economy and other aspects. Moreover, modern warfare can make it difficult for the global economy to return to normal if it occurs for a long time. As a result of war, apart from high oil and energy prices, other commodities can experience price fluctuations, such as metals, aluminum and palladium. What is certain is that the impact of war could result in and complicate the FED's task of controlling inflation without triggering an economic recession.

Apart from that, there are many other economic impacts from the impact of the war, such as the stock market index declining, trade being disrupted, investors being afraid to come and existing investors leaving.

Exactly, since war is inevitable and by using a more devastating techniques and strategies of warfare it is really hard to recover in a short period of time. I've been living in a country that has been in war since early foreign occupation and until now we are still on it though it's more of an internal conflict with insurgents but still has huge impact in the economic growth of the country.

To be able to recover from war conditions is certainly not an easy thing, it takes a long time to improve the economic situation for a country hit by war and there is no way to avoid war, so in this case it is very clear that no war has a good impact. for the economy of every country experiencing war. because everyone who has the desire to build a business in a country experiencing war will certainly not dare to build it and everyone in a country experiencing war will have difficulty finding work that can provide them with an income so that the country's economic cycle will be hampered.

War's impact is no doubt big for a country. If it is too long since the war and the country hasn't recovered yet. The problem is with the leaders. While many of the world oppressors have already paid their debts and damages to the country that they infiltrated.

Victim of these wars should have made contingency plans on how they are going to recover economically unless there are fake leaders out there and play as decoys and corrupts.

War is a very terrifying experience for a country and a nation. Although nothing good can ever be expected from wars, wars are fought sometimes to meet basic needs and sometimes to show one's dominance. Whatever the reason, it has a massive negative impact on the nation and its citizens. We know very well that war means a huge military expenditure that can destroy a country's economy. As military spending increases, war-torn countries suffer infrastructural damage and complete crop destruction, which in turn drives up commodity prices in global markets and creates humanitarian catastrophe.

Yeah, also Russia is buying Shahed drones from Iran and millions of artillery shells and rockets from North Korea. These three regimes should be dealt with simultaneously, and they should be eradicated at once. Most of the population in those countries will only thank West for that. And after the liberation from those evil regimes they will prosper economically, I'm sure.

The current state of the world in GDP reduction seems like the world is not growing even though the war has stopped.  However, it is not a matter of the world, but the GDP of Bangladesh is decreasing day by day.  It seems that the current situation seems to be that of the world.  Closer to the start of the war, the earth will be shattered that no one will go to that start of the war.  A few days ago, please give and the war between Israel is a break, but at any moment it can be again.  business or any of their standards.
 If this love and war between Russia and Russia becomes bigger then World War 3 can happen if it is natural that different countries will get involved in it.  However, Bangladesh's 460 billion seems to be the current GDP in that case, even if the GDP has increased a little, it is not a cause for relief.

The war that Russia unleashed with its large-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 has significantly increased the arms race in most countries, especially the United States and Europe. In Russia itself, all defense enterprises are now working around the clock and at full capacity. The production of military products has also been established at enterprises that previously specialized in the manufacture of civilian goods. As the Kremlin repeatedly threatens NATO member states, it is also modernizing its armed forces and allocating more funds to purchase weapons that have performed well in the war in Ukraine. On the one hand, this increases employment, but on the other hand, it practically does not contribute to an increase in GDP, since military products are almost immediately destroyed during military operations.

Your opinion is wrong that if other countries are drawn into this war, it will lead to the Third World War. If Ukraine is not helped, it will be conquered by a stronger Russia, after which Russia will certainly attack the Baltic countries - Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia. At the same time, Russia will force Ukrainians to fight on its side. Therefore, evil, if not stopped in time, will grow throughout the world. Other authoritarian states such as North Korea, Iran, China will take advantage of the weakness of democracy and also begin their wars of conquest. Then this will lead to the Third World War.

What makes you think so? Have you got any proof? Any source to support your claim? Russia does not need the Baltic States. These countries are tiny, have no valuable resources and are protected by NATO as member states. Russia is not ready to take on NATO now and won't be in foreseeable future.

I totally agree with you, actually war is a curse for any country or nation. It brings negative consequences on infrastructure, public health provision, and social order.

As you mentioned about oil and energy price, it destroys the country's economy actually. Everyday activities of a community or country are disrupted and property may be damaged.

Yes metals, aluminum and palladium price goes up, with this, some companies also take profit from war. you know, because of war, weapon manufacturers company and medicine companies can make profits. Because of war many people are injured, and die so at that point medicines are essential. So medicine companies make good profits.


Agreed, fiat value of affected country dropped significantly, neighbor country also dont want to take their fiat. The economy collapses in a way that takes years to recover. for example Ukraine's economy has now collapsed, Palestine's economy is left with nothing.

Indeed, war conditions can make the economy not normal because wars like now are too sophisticated and more destructive. For an economy to recover from war it may take years due to the destruction caused by war. In the economic recovery phase resulting from the impact of war, industry will grow and emerge to rebuild the aftermath of the war, some businesses will even survive and some will not be able to recover.

Yes, war creates so much difficulties for any country, nation, government, etc. You know when any country gets attacked neighboring country must spend more than its normal budget cause they have many economic interconnections. This makes the situation when the cost of everything will be increased. Which is not good for any country or nation. It makes normal life abnormal.



It affects transportation and logistics because the price of oil, petrol, octane everything will be increased. When people lost their lives, and work their purchasing power significantly dropped, economy was ruined in a sudden, I don't only talk about the affected country but also the entire world economy hampered because of war. so it is not expected for any country, that's why we have to be patient. We should not lose our temper and start fighting, we should do everything thinking about future generations.

The Estonian Foreign Intelligence Service said the Kremlin is preparing for a possible conflict with NATO that could arise in the next decade, in particular by moving to a mass army model. As the intelligence report explains, Russia's intentions are evidenced by army reforms initiated by Russian Defense Minister Shoigu. In particular, the Russians decided to eliminate the joint strategic commands and return to the model of command and control by types of forces and special forces. Thus, in the northwestern part of the Russian Federation, the Baltic and Northern Fleet will be transferred to the direct subordination of the Russian Navy, and the air defense will be subordinated to the Aerospace Forces. Military districts will begin to function as territorial military commands.

Another change: on February 26, Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a decree “On military-administrative separation.” Now in Russia the Western Military District (WMD) will be disbanded, and in its place the Leningrad (LPO) and Moscow (MPO) military districts will be formed, as was the case before 2010. The decree, according to analysts at the Institute for the Study of War (ISW), is a sign that Russia is preparing for war against NATO. This is due to the fact that the LPO will now cover the area along the northeastern border of NATO, and the MVO will border the northeastern part of Ukraine and Poland. This does not stretch the strategic focus, as in the case of the Western Military District, and will allow the Russian Federation to simultaneously field troops against NATO countries, optimize command and control over troops for waging war in Ukraine.

The third important management change in the Russian Army is the addition of a corps command level to the command structure of the ground forces. It is planned to switch to a four-level management scheme: military district - army - corps - division. Previously, army corps were already part of the structure of the Russian ground forces, but they were only located in geographically isolated regions, such as the Kaliningrad region, Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands or the Kola Peninsula.

Shoigu's reform also envisages increasing the number of troops to 1.5 million by 2026, reorganizing 12 ground and naval brigades into divisions and creating dozens of new units larger than a regiment in the ground forces, air force, navy and airborne forces.
https://hromadske.ua/ru/posts/razvedka-estonii-rossiya-gotovitsya-k-vojne-s-nato-v-sleduyushie-10-let-i-uzhe-narashivaet-nastupatelnye-vozmozhnosti

  Last year, Russia deployed Kalibr missile-carrying ships to Lake Ladoga near St. Petersburg for the first time. Already, the Russians are actively using electronic warfare systems, communications suppression, and GPS signals in the Baltic region.
https://24tv.ua/ru/rossija-gotovitsja-k-vojne-nato-k-kakim-provokacijam-protiv-evropy_n2504436

Germany has already developed a secret plan in the event of a “dramatic scenario of a hybrid large-scale Russian attack on NATO’s eastern flank” in the summer of 2025.

The first stage, according to the German military, will begin this spring with the additional mobilization of 200 thousand military personnel in Russia and the successful spring offensive of the Russian army in Ukraine until June this year. In July, Russia will begin, first covertly, and then increasingly overtly, an attack on Western countries using cyber sabotage and other hybrid methods of warfare - mainly against the Baltic countries.

In September, Russia begins large-scale Zapad 2024 exercises in western Russia and Belarus, in October it deploys medium-range missiles and builds up its troops in the Kaliningrad region, ostensibly to preempt an impending NATO attack. In fact, Russia plans to seize the narrow Suwalki corridor on the border between Poland and Lithuania and stage a border conflict there in December 2024 with numerous casualties. In May 2025, NATO decides on deterrence measures to prevent Russia from attacking the Suwalki corridor from the Kaliningrad region and from Belarus.

And then, in conditions of temporary anarchy in the United States after the presidential elections, Russia repeats the Eastern Ukrainian scenario of 2014, but on NATO territory. On “Day X,” the NATO commander-in-chief orders the transfer of 300 thousand alliance troops, including 30 thousand Bundeswehr soldiers to NATO’s eastern flank. It is not clear how the escalation ends: on the 30th day after “Day X”, half a million heavily armed Russian and NATO soldiers will confront each other in the area of the Suwalki corridor.
https://www.dw.com/ru/ataka-rossii-na-nato-eksperty-o-publikacii-v-bild/a-67985738

The problem of the modern world is that unreasonableness in the choice of partners, as well as greed and cowardice of the world elites, led to the fact that such cancerous tumors of the world as Russia, Iran, North Korea and the like were able to gain strength and arm themselves. As a result, we got what we are seeing now. It should also be understood that it is easier for these "cancerous tumor" countries, they have no values and aim only at destruction and chaos. The developed world has to spend an order of magnitude more money and effort. Therefore, either the modern developed world will make the right lesson and simply destroy such "centers of fatal disease", or these tumors will destroy the modern world. I hope for reason, and a systematic fight against what is trying to kill the world.

War is an endless circle that can have profound consequences for the global economy, including interruptions to supply chains, price increases, higher borrowing costs, and instability in politics.

One of the most troubling consequences is the rise in energy and food prices. Violence in important industries can have an impact on both food and energy manufacturing, resulting in less availability and higher prices for these essential goods. This can have serious consequences for persons and companies, particularly for nations that depend largely on exports.

Political instability is a further problem, as war can result in government changes, and currency is a big concern during wartime.

We are not considering what happens to people's lives, on the other hand, it affects the standard of living because commodities will be scarce because a lot of people's shops will be destroyed and only a few people will have access to them.  except for the aid that is coming from the government and not everyone will be able to collect most of the aid and talk about health. and have been wondering about some countries that have poor health care, and how or what they will do during war. So there are more serious issues than just the economy of the country at war. and the prices of oil and energy might not be that important compared to food and health. and also were to hide to avoid being hit by missiles, gunshots, or anything. because a lot of people will lose their houses and it would even lead to a high standard of living and also cost the country more to restore normalcy in that country.

Nobody cares what that US sockpuppet has to say. Estonia is de-facto governed by the US. These poor Estonian guys just literally receive their press-releases and speeches from the US embassy. The Estonian Foreign Intelligence Service = CIA. They keep whining about Russia attacking them for like last 20-25 years or so already.

How can these reforms be a proof of Russia preparing an attack on the Baltics?

This is Russia's response to a further unreasonable NATO expansion (Finland + Sweden).

Don't mix reality with these hypothetical scenarios of the military.  8)

Today's war, unleashed by the terrorist Kremlin regime, is especially dangerous because they are not simply waging a war of conquest in the “scorched earth” concept in Ukraine, they are also destabilizing the whole world, feeding and provoking their “lap dogs” all over the world. The world of terror and violence, maddened by impunity, has a big trump card - to destroy and destroy is always incomparably easier and cheaper than to create and build. By investing 1 dollar in terror, you can destroy thousands of dollars worth of simple material assets, destroy lives... Corrupt politicians, “on a leash” from the Kremlin, easily sabotage the work of entire governments and unions. Total lies are another weapon of terrorist countries - they are in many information channels...
I hope the modern world will draw conclusions that it did not do after the Second World War - we must not flirt with and give the opportunity to develop to bastard regimes. Otherwise, the whole world will plunge into chaos, carnage, and today’s time will seem “very nice” to us.

War leads to forced migration causing potentially large displacements of population,and the war has thus pushed 7.1 million more people into poverty,hindering so many years of growth and progress.

The impacts of war increasingly lead to further harm by making food insecurity and leading poverty to a more dangerous levels.It has promoted food shortages in so many stages.War creates room for so many difficulties and cumbersome frustrations at large.People literally undergo delay,slowdown in economic performances and extreme food insecurity at large.

There's a general global instability and wreckage caused by the emergence of war on the society and individuals by reducing the standard of living.

This is so messed up everyone seems to have no conscience at all towards other innocent people. The effects of prolonged war have caused great setbacks throughout the world, all crises have occurred and will always have a bad impact. Just imagine how greedy those with iron fists are who make people have to evacuate and delay eating every time the time comes, how children have lost their hope of life. How tragic! So who can make it end quickly? United Nations leaders must take this seriously and quickly so that the world can recover.

No, you are definitely a Russian, if not by nationality, then by the great imperial Russian ideology. Finland and Sweden submitted their applications to join NATO after Russia carried out a large-scale military invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Isn't this a sufficient justification for joining this alliance, when they saw how Russia is trying to brazenly and brutally destroy a neighboring state? On the other hand, only the people of Finland and Sweden, as well as the government they elected, can determine their foreign policy course, and no Russia has the right to tell them here.
Russia has already attacked the borders of Finland with refugees from third countries, as it previously tried to do on the Belarusian-Polish border. Therefore, Finland was forced to completely close the border with Russia since last fall.

As for Russia’s preparations for an attack on NATO countries, in particular the Baltic countries, in this matter each country relies on its own sources, including its intelligence data, and publishes only its conclusions, and not the facts about such preparations. From the point of view of Kremlin propaganda, of course, all countries that have not fallen under Russian influence are puppets of the United States.

Until the very last day before the attack on Ukraine, Putin and his circle denied at all official levels the possibility of an attack on it. Therefore, European countries already know that the Putin regime cannot be taken at its word. And since the Kremlin’s mouthpieces periodically continue to threaten a good half of European countries with various methods of military attack, even this is enough for these countries to consider such a threat real. Partly because of this, Europe is now increasing the size and armament of its army, increasing the production of the defense industry and continues to provide all possible assistance to Ukraine to protect it from Russian occupiers.

The other two ideas aren't as straightforward as true or false. Statement number two is true: while war often causes a drop in the value of stocks, this is frequently not the case. during the seasons of conflict, commodities may rise because buyers believe industries that give services and products to military personnel are more secure. Finally, while war usually results in price increases, it is not a given conclusion. It relies on a number of circumstances, including the seriousness of the war and the country's general financial situation.

1.Generally true. Wars often lead to destruction of infrastructure, disruption of trade, and loss of human capital. While there can be short-term boosts from defense spending, sustained economic growth is unlikely during a prolonged war.

2.This is largely accurate. Oil fuels military vehicles, ships, and aircraft. Disruptions to oil supplies can severely hinder military operations, making it a vital strategic resource.

3.True, but it's a simplification. Wars introduce uncertainty and instability, leading investors to become risk-averse. However, specific industries like defense and oil may see their stocks rise due to increased demand.

Overall, your statements reflect common effects of war on the economy, but it's essential to remember that  the economic impact of war is always complex and depends on the specific conflict, its duration, and the nations involved.