The impact of war on global economy.

[AnonBitCoiner]

I think it's true that world war will not only have an impact on stocks, even crypto and gold will also have a very big impact and currencies in certain countries will also be affected, I think and oil could be the most important resource, even the price of oil can become very expensive in some countries. What do you think, I'm just saying what's in my head, correct me if I'm wrong, give me your opinion about this, is there a positive impact?

World War has negative impact on countries because there is not a single country which is completely independent therefore for anything which is not present in their country they continue the process of import and export to offer each facility to their citizens. The price of certain things increases because that are not present in a country and from outside the country when war persist then it is not possible to carry out import and export.

Oil and other energy cost can be greatly enhance due to global war but in my perspective crypto is totally unaffected with war because bitcoin price remains at the same position but instead any harmful effect on bitcoin the price of it is increasing continuously. The effect on bitcoin is only due to rumours as well supply and demand but wars have no effect on crypto market at all.

[1715073972]

1715073972

[1715073972]

1715073972

[1715073972]

1715073972

[1715073972]

1715073972

[1715073972]

1715073972

[arimamib]

War is something that can crash any economy to zero just like we have been seeing with Ukraine. Russia economy is still stable compared to the Ukrainian economy that would need a lot of aids to get to her feet. The consequences of war is very disasterous and we should never pray for that.

The people that are living in Ukraine peacefully have left there country for another country especially the women so they can safeguard there lives. War is evil and if we become decieved and we do not plan on how to help ourselves to grow and live in harmony,the opposite might be the case.

War is a disaster that should never be resorted to. It is a costly and destructive path that leads to suffering and long-lasting scars. The ongoing conflict in Ukraine is a tragic example of the human cost of war. Millions of people have been displaced from their homes, their lives turned upside down. Cities and infrastructure have been ravaged causing economic hardship and hindering humanitarian efforts.

The psychological trauma of war will continue to affect people and communities for years. We must never forget that war is a last resort, not a solution. Diplomacy and dialogue are the only paths to resolving conflicts peacefully and building a brighter future for all.

[DrBeer]

....
OMG, you're hilarious!  I don't even have to respond because you're debunking your own lies literally! 

Neither your "assessment of problems" list nor the article you mentioned (at least Google translated version) doesn't contain any mention of Western sanctions being the reason of USSR collapsing. It reminds me of police reading you your rights to not testify against yourself but you're still self-incriminating    Tell me, are you retarded?

I can't even add anything, you've done it all yourself.... sanctions don't work! 

Anyways, you still have time to join the military and go meet your heroic compatriots in the eastern front. I know you're too cowardly to do it, right?

Of course, I knew that the intellect and you are two parallel lines But I didn’t think that you were also far from each other, that even the shadow of the intellect did not fall on you

Well, ok, it’s not difficult for me, I’ll explain.
There are words written there that are incomprehensible to you:
- decrease in economic growth rates;
- chronic shortage of food and consumer goods;
- the growing scientific and technical lag of the USSR from Western countries;
- exhaustion of the possibilities of the extensive economy;

This means:
- in the USSR they could no longer support the economy due to its degradation
- the economy of the USSR during this period became so weak that the economy of the BIGGEST COUNTRY in the world, with 40% of all earth resources, could not even provide its residents with food!
- due to the impossibility of receiving technology from the West, the USSR could not produce high-tech goods, because its own economy was weak, and “every day” it was getting weaker.
- but this one will be difficult. The word “extensive economy” has clearly broken the remains of your gray matter But I always help the weaker, and even the intellectually weak like you I will teach you this word. An extensive economy means that the economy is built through new construction, the development of new lands, the use of untouched natural resources, an increase in the number of workers, etc.

Now strain your first vertical brain gyrus and draw a conclusion - if before the sanctions there were no such problems, but after the sanctions they appeared - what was the consequence of such problems, or significantly influenced their appearance? I'm waiting for an interesting answer from your vertical brain gyrus?!

Of course, I knew that the intellect and you are two parallel lines But I didn’t think that you were also far from each other, that even the shadow of the intellect did not fall on you

Well, ok, it’s not difficult for me, I’ll explain.
There are words written there that are incomprehensible to you:
- decrease in economic growth rates;
- chronic shortage of food and consumer goods;
- the growing scientific and technical lag of the USSR from Western countries;
- exhaustion of the possibilities of the extensive economy;

This means:
- in the USSR they could no longer support the economy due to its degradation
- the economy of the USSR during this period became so weak that the economy of the BIGGEST COUNTRY in the world, with 40% of all earth resources, could not even provide its residents with food!
- due to the impossibility of receiving technology from the West, the USSR could not produce high-tech goods, because its own economy was weak, and “every day” it was getting weaker.
- but this one will be difficult. The word “extensive economy” has clearly broken the remains of your gray matter But I always help the weaker, and even the intellectually weak like you I will teach you this word. An extensive economy means that the economy is built through new construction, the development of new lands, the use of untouched natural resources, an increase in the number of workers, etc.

Now strain your first vertical gyrus and draw a conclusion - if before the sanctions there were no such problems, but after the sanctions they appeared - what was the consequence of such problems, or significantly influenced their appearance? I'm waiting for an interesting answer from your vertical gyrus?!

PS I sincerely hope that you understand what a “brain gyrus” is! Although... 

[serveria.com]

....
OMG, you're hilarious!  I don't even have to respond because you're debunking your own lies literally! 

Neither your "assessment of problems" list nor the article you mentioned (at least Google translated version) doesn't contain any mention of Western sanctions being the reason of USSR collapsing. It reminds me of police reading you your rights to not testify against yourself but you're still self-incriminating    Tell me, are you retarded?

I can't even add anything, you've done it all yourself.... sanctions don't work! 

Anyways, you still have time to join the military and go meet your heroic compatriots in the eastern front. I know you're too cowardly to do it, right?

Of course, I knew that the intellect and you are two parallel lines But I didn’t think that you were also far from each other, that even the shadow of the intellect did not fall on you

Well, ok, it’s not difficult for me, I’ll explain.
There are words written there that are incomprehensible to you:
- decrease in economic growth rates;
- chronic shortage of food and consumer goods;
- the growing scientific and technical lag of the USSR from Western countries;
- exhaustion of the possibilities of the extensive economy;

This means:
- in the USSR they could no longer support the economy due to its degradation
- the economy of the USSR during this period became so weak that the economy of the BIGGEST COUNTRY in the world, with 40% of all earth resources, could not even provide its residents with food!
- due to the impossibility of receiving technology from the West, the USSR could not produce high-tech goods, because its own economy was weak, and “every day” it was getting weaker.
- but this one will be difficult. The word “extensive economy” has clearly broken the remains of your gray matter But I always help the weaker, and even the intellectually weak like you I will teach you this word. An extensive economy means that the economy is built through new construction, the development of new lands, the use of untouched natural resources, an increase in the number of workers, etc.

Now strain your first vertical brain gyrus and draw a conclusion - if before the sanctions there were no such problems, but after the sanctions they appeared - what was the consequence of such problems, or significantly influenced their appearance? I'm waiting for an interesting answer from your vertical brain gyrus?!

Of course, I knew that the intellect and you are two parallel lines But I didn’t think that you were also far from each other, that even the shadow of the intellect did not fall on you

Well, ok, it’s not difficult for me, I’ll explain.
There are words written there that are incomprehensible to you:
- decrease in economic growth rates;
- chronic shortage of food and consumer goods;
- the growing scientific and technical lag of the USSR from Western countries;
- exhaustion of the possibilities of the extensive economy;

This means:
- in the USSR they could no longer support the economy due to its degradation
- the economy of the USSR during this period became so weak that the economy of the BIGGEST COUNTRY in the world, with 40% of all earth resources, could not even provide its residents with food!
- due to the impossibility of receiving technology from the West, the USSR could not produce high-tech goods, because its own economy was weak, and “every day” it was getting weaker.
- but this one will be difficult. The word “extensive economy” has clearly broken the remains of your gray matter But I always help the weaker, and even the intellectually weak like you I will teach you this word. An extensive economy means that the economy is built through new construction, the development of new lands, the use of untouched natural resources, an increase in the number of workers, etc.

Now strain your first vertical gyrus and draw a conclusion - if before the sanctions there were no such problems, but after the sanctions they appeared - what was the consequence of such problems, or significantly influenced their appearance? I'm waiting for an interesting answer from your vertical gyrus?!

PS I sincerely hope that you understand what a “brain gyrus” is! Although... 

Damn, you're so retarded you pasted your post contents twice! 

Anyway, all this doesn't have anything to do with sanctions. All consequences you have mentioned were in fact caused by highly ineffective and poorly managed planned economy of USSR. But even then USSR could have easily continued to exist. If only the US wouldn't have paid Gorbachev, Yeltsin and national movements in the republics to destroy it. Anyone with at least room temperature IQ understands this.

[glendall]

of course there will be an impact from the war itself, but in general it will definitely be on the economy where economic activity will be indirectly hampered whether it is export or import goods in one country, even domestic trade will be very bad because of the lack of supply, because of this all prices will go up and there won't even be any stock.
Apart from economics, it is a humanitarian problem, where there will be many civilians and children who will become victims
I hope that in this world no one will wage war again and that countries that are at war will soon be at peace

[shinratensei_]

War is something that can crash any economy to zero just like we have been seeing with Ukraine. Russia economy is still stable compared to the Ukrainian economy that would need a lot of aids to get to her feet. The consequences of war is very disasterous and we should never pray for that.

The people that are living in Ukraine peacefully have left there country for another country especially the women so they can safeguard there lives. War is evil and if we become decieved and we do not plan on how to help ourselves to grow and live in harmony,the opposite might be the case.

War is a disaster that should never be resorted to. It is a costly and destructive path that leads to suffering and long-lasting scars. The ongoing conflict in Ukraine is a tragic example of the human cost of war. Millions of people have been displaced from their homes, their lives turned upside down. Cities and infrastructure have been ravaged causing economic hardship and hindering humanitarian efforts.

The psychological trauma of war will continue to affect people and communities for years. We must never forget that war is a last resort, not a solution. Diplomacy and dialogue are the only paths to resolving conflicts peacefully and building a brighter future for all.

true, global economy also impacted with the changing landscapes, diplomacy should always be the best way to discuss problems about dispute in the border, etc but many countries just instead outright trying to take the most destructive path ever that is the war, I personally would prefer the world to be in peace, where there's no human would be sacrificed in the war but alas it seems thats quite hard to implement.
because sometime with diplomacy they'd meet dead end which later then caused the aggression.
but seeing the overall economic globally, it further increase the fluctuation rate which might be worrying for some people with minimum wage because their purchasing power is plummeting.

[martinex]

of course there will be an impact from the war itself, but in general it will definitely be on the economy where economic activity will be indirectly hampered whether it is export or import goods in one country, even domestic trade will be very bad because of the lack of supply, because of this all prices will go up and there won't even be any stock.
Apart from economics, it is a humanitarian problem, where there will be many civilians and children who will become victims
I hope that in this world no one will wage war again and that countries that are at war will soon be at peace

Everyone has the same hopes. The victims were mostly civilians, children and women.

It's quite sad to have to lose parents and parents to lose their beloved children. It's true, the war also resulted in a shortage of food supplies, even though a lot of aid came, it was definitely not evenly distributed and business activities were also disrupted.

The saddest thing right now is what is happening in Middle East right now. I also hope that this conflict will be resolved quickly and find a good middle ground.
     

[G_Besar]

of course there will be an impact from the war itself, but in general it will definitely be on the economy where economic activity will be indirectly hampered whether it is export or import goods in one country, even domestic trade will be very bad because of the lack of supply, because of this all prices will go up and there won't even be any stock.
Apart from economics, it is a humanitarian problem, where there will be many civilians and children who will become victims
I hope that in this world no one will wage war again and that countries that are at war will soon be at peace

As long as there are leaders who are selfish and have no shame in anything, war will always exist in this world because the purpose of war is to slaughter each other, not to make peace. So I also hope that in the future there will be no more leaders of any country who feel selfish and feel more powerful so that it could cause another prolonged war in certain regions.

Everyone can see what happened to European countries that were involved in war and also see what happened to countries in the Middle East as a result of war. Almost all infrastructure destruction occurs through war, so it is appropriate for all leaders to open their eyes to set the intention to make peace so that any destruction can be stopped well.

[itorai]

Of course, war usually has a profound and lasting effect on any economy because it affects the overall economic stability of that country. Nothing will function well because of the impact the war has caused. war brings about inflation, trade disruption, currency devaluation, an increase in government spending, and lots of infrastructural and human damage, so many refugees and IDP camps to mention a few.
Oil plays a significant role in modern warfare due to its role in energy supply, logistics, and so on but there are other resources like information, food and water, mineral and material resources, economic and financial resources that also help in determining the outcome of a conflict.

You are right, the impact of war involves various aspects, as you mentioned, and food does play a key role in determining the success or failure of a conflict. Apart from that, war also leaves scars that are difficult to recover from, both in terms of physical damage and psychological impacts on the people involved.

[GreenStox]

Oil is the main key to a country. If war occurs, those who have a lot of oil resources and supplies will be in power and can control the market.
I think the country's economy will improve because of that, maybe it will affect other sectors but in that area they are superior.

[DrBeer]

.....
Damn, you're so retarded you pasted your post contents twice! 
Anyway, all this doesn't have anything to do with sanctions. All consequences you have mentioned were in fact caused by highly ineffective and poorly managed planned economy of USSR. But even then USSR could have easily continued to exist. If only the US wouldn't have paid Gorbachev, Yeltsin and national movements in the republics to destroy it. Anyone with at least room temperature IQ understands this.

I would be really surprised if you had any reasoned answer except primitive, habitual stupid insults, and repeated repetition of convenient mantras

You can think whatever you want, deny causality, deny real processes, but you won't become smarter, but you will look as stupid and primitive

PS And here is a question for you, probably the last one, it is interesting purely from the point of view of psychiatry and your logical health - the economy of the USSR with high oil prices and the ability to sell it, worked not badly and even had a time called "the golden age of the USSR", collapsed in a little more than 10 years, exactly after the embargo was introduced, and at the same time oil prices fell. You really don't see any connection ?
I think that if you stick your finger in the socket, you will be electrocuted, the electricity suppliers will be to blame, because they sent it to your socket incorrectly, and electric current should not harm your body !??  Well, live in your illusory world, amuse people with your morbid fantasies further


But back to the topic, as always the list of the next "achievements of the great economy of russia"
- The number of Russians who received residence permits and foreign citizenship doubled over the year
- Courts received more than 4,000 cases of escape from military units after the start of mobilization
- Law enforcers raided a Wildberries warehouse in the Moscow region to hand out summonses to the military recruitment center. "There are no losses, everything is going according to plans"
- Cyprus began blocking Chinese cards of Russian banks
- Moscow dropped out of the top 50 leading scientific centers of the world
- In Samara, students were asked to give up e-cigarettes for chips for drones. World's second army, great economy ))))
- Cars in Russia have gone up in price almost 1.5 times in a year
- Announced by Rostec as a "completely in-house development, having no analogues in the world", the anti-drone complex was found on free sale on Aliexpress.... it has been sold by a Chinese company for a long time
- Gas in Europe gets cheaper amid strong supply, high inventory levels
- Finland closed all border crossings with Russia except one..... in the Arctic ! Subtle Finnish humor
- Bananas in Russia have risen in price to a record high since 2000 due to the devaluation of the ruble
- Russian authorities refused to pay for cancer drugs for Russians to save money for war ...
- Moscow's budget has a 1.1 trillion ruble hole in it

And a bit from critical psychiatry, the patient is again giving out "masterpieces" "Putin accused Western artificial intelligence of Russophobia and demanded to invent a Russian one with "traditional values"""

[knowngunman]

As long as there are leaders who are selfish and have no shame in anything, war will always exist in this world because the purpose of war is to slaughter each other, not to make peace. So I also hope that in the future there will be no more leaders of any country who feel selfish and feel more powerful so that it could cause another prolonged war in certain regions.

Everyone can see what happened to European countries that were involved in war and also see what happened to countries in the Middle East as a result of war. Almost all infrastructure destruction occurs through war, so it is appropriate for all leaders to open their eyes to set the intention to make peace so that any destruction can be stopped well.

War can never be totally get rid of as long as we have leaders who are on seat of power for personal purposes rather than people they're representing. Too much of Greed, ambition and desire for power are the reasons pushing our leaders to make decisions that lead to war. In the worst cases, some of these leaders are willing to sacrifice the lives and well being of their own people in order to achieve their own personal goals forgetting that the costs of war is very devastating and it'snot  not limited to the immediate loss of life or physical destruction alone. Just as the tittle of this thread, war can have long lasting economic and social consequences that can prevent a country from developing and improving the lives of its people. Unfortunately, our leaders nowadays don't see war as something big because the lives of the citizens are valueless to them and the war has less effect on them physically.

[Youngkhngdiddy]

As long as there are leaders who are selfish and have no shame in anything, war will always exist in this world because the purpose of war is to slaughter each other, not to make peace. So I also hope that in the future there will be no more leaders of any country who feel selfish and feel more powerful so that it could cause another prolonged war in certain regions.

Everyone can see what happened to European countries that were involved in war and also see what happened to countries in the Middle East as a result of war. Almost all infrastructure destruction occurs through war, so it is appropriate for all leaders to open their eyes to set the intention to make peace so that any destruction can be stopped well.

    War has an effect on the economy of the area it occurred which is the major reason why it's avoided at high cost. We may not understand the depth of dangerous effects it poses till we experience it but it's really not what we should anticipate. Lives will be lost, there'll be halt in economic activities, so many inter national relationships will be on Sandy ground because there'll be breakouts and fall outs.
    The economy of the nation will be fueled into the war and the citizens will be left to make do with what they own and have in their store for the period it'll last. Living will be difficult and be in jeopardy, fear will set in all because of unpredictable occurrences. The well-being of the people will be put secondary because the major goal will be conquering the war. It's no doubt going to be an unhealthy experience so as a nation, we should do all that's possible to avoid such happening.

[JMBitcointernational]

1. Increase in the national GDP is least likely to be caused by a war.
2. Oil is considered the most crucial resource in modern warfare.
3. War affects the stock market by causing a decline in stock prices.

What do you guys think? Is this true or false?

War has actuallly caused more harm that Good In every Nation that has experienced It ,the impact is So crucial such that It can reduce the economic activities of a country as well a as cause deflation or inflation which can result to economic crisis . War as the name implies had remained a unique threat to every country because It affects them demographically as a result death.

Generally , no country wants war or conflicts irrespective of How strong they are because it can cause The following
1.reduction in population
2.loss of property
3.economic crisis
4.inflation
5.increase in death rates  And So many others .
Therefore , Its quite Advisable To avoid war rather than To accept It because Its impacts can be harmful than helpful.

[arimamib]

~

   War has an effect on the economy of the area it occurred which is the major reason why it's avoided at high cost. We may not understand the depth of dangerous effects it poses till we experience it but it's really not what we should anticipate. Lives will be lost, there'll be halt in economic activities, so many inter national relationships will be on Sandy ground because there'll be breakouts and fall outs.
    The economy of the nation will be fueled into the war and the citizens will be left to make do with what they own and have in their store for the period it'll last. Living will be difficult and be in jeopardy, fear will set in all because of unpredictable occurrences. The well-being of the people will be put secondary because the major goal will be conquering the war. It's no doubt going to be an unhealthy experience so as a nation, we should do all that's possible to avoid such happening.

War is indeed a scourge that makes the profitable risk is severe, dismembering trade, destroying  structure, and diverting coffers down from essential requirements. The profitable impact of war extends far beyond the actual immediate conflict zone. It ripples throughout global impact, causing insecurity and query that can have lasting goods. The recent conflict in Ukraine, has transferred energy prices soaring, disintegrated force chains, and contributed to rising affectation worldwide.

It essentially needs to seek peaceful resolutions to conflicts and strengthen transnational institutions that promote dialogue and cooperation, given the  ruinous consequences of war. The citizens always suffer the most impact directly and indirectly. The pursuit of peace isn't just a moral imperative, but also an  profitable and strategic necessity.

[Xampeuu]

As long as there are leaders who are selfish and have no shame in anything, war will always exist in this world because the purpose of war is to slaughter each other, not to make peace. So I also hope that in the future there will be no more leaders of any country who feel selfish and feel more powerful so that it could cause another prolonged war in certain regions.

Everyone can see what happened to European countries that were involved in war and also see what happened to countries in the Middle East as a result of war. Almost all infrastructure destruction occurs through war, so it is appropriate for all leaders to open their eyes to set the intention to make peace so that any destruction can be stopped well.

    War has an effect on the economy of the area it occurred which is the major reason why it's avoided at high cost. We may not understand the depth of dangerous effects it poses till we experience it but it's really not what we should anticipate. Lives will be lost, there'll be halt in economic activities, so many inter national relationships will be on Sandy ground because there'll be breakouts and fall outs.
    The economy of the nation will be fueled into the war and the citizens will be left to make do with what they own and have in their store for the period it'll last. Living will be difficult and be in jeopardy, fear will set in all because of unpredictable occurrences. The well-being of the people will be put secondary because the major goal will be conquering the war. It's no doubt going to be an unhealthy experience so as a nation, we should do all that's possible to avoid such happening.

Civilians will become sacrifices for self-interested leaders, with war of course there must be a profit commensurate with the costs incurred. Sometimes human greed overrides humanity, so that in the end a peaceful life is difficult for the people to obtain. For those who lose, of course they will suffer even more as if the world is unfair to them, especially since they have lost their beloved brother

[Lamkuthang]

Parties to a conflict can always read the worst impacts if a conflict occurs, namely the high risk of loss of civilian lives. However, what is interesting here is that if a country wants to be safe from threats from outside, it needs a strong military force and if at any time a conflict occurs then this needs to be done immediately as an action whose negative impact is smaller than other potential dangers that will arise by the opposing party.

[idarasun]

Parties to a conflict can always read the worst impacts if a conflict occurs, namely the high risk of loss of civilian lives. However, what is interesting here is that if a country wants to be safe from threats from outside, it needs a strong military force and if at any time a conflict occurs then this needs to be done immediately as an action whose negative impact is smaller than other potential dangers that will arise by the opposing party.

if a country wants to be safe from threats from outside, it needs a strong military force

This statement is true, it's just that having a strong military force without a good sense of humanity, in my opinion, all of this will be in vain because a prolonged conflict begins with greed without paying attention to humanity.

[electronicash]

Parties to a conflict can always read the worst impacts if a conflict occurs, namely the high risk of loss of civilian lives. However, what is interesting here is that if a country wants to be safe from threats from outside, it needs a strong military force and if at any time a conflict occurs then this needs to be done immediately as an action whose negative impact is smaller than other potential dangers that will arise by the opposing party.

if a country wants to be safe from threats from outside, it needs a strong military force

This statement is true, it's just that having a strong military force without a good sense of humanity, in my opinion, all of this will be in vain because a prolonged conflict begins with greed without paying attention to humanity.

a country wouldn't be able to have a strong military force if they are sanctioned financially that's why it's necessary for countries who dominate to make those countries poor so they can't fight back. and for that to happen they enforce political intervention in those poor countries.

humanity will be ignored when existential threats are high. israel for example will not stop especially now that they are into deep in this situation for if they do stop, they will also perish. now compare it to other countries at war this time because they are all in such situation.

[southerngentuk]

The devastating impact of war on a nation's economy is a stark reminder of the interconnectedness of human society and the fragility of economic systems. War disrupts the delicate balance of production, consumption, and trade, leaving a trail of destruction and destabilization in its wake.

One of the most immediate and severe consequences of war is the disruption of trade networks. Supply chains are severed, transportation routes become impassable, and international markets are thrown into disarray. This disruption leads to shortages of essential goods, including food, medicine, and fuel, driving up prices and exacerbating existing hardships.

Inflation, the persistent increase in the general price level of goods and services, becomes a rampant problem in war-torn economies. As governments resort to deficit spending to finance their war efforts, the money supply expands, leading to a decline in the purchasing power of currency. This erosion of purchasing power further exacerbates the plight of ordinary citizens, who struggle to afford basic necessities.