Bitcoin Forum

Other => Off-topic => Topic started by: BFL-Engineer on March 17, 2012, 12:40:17 PM



Title: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: BFL-Engineer on March 17, 2012, 12:40:17 PM
Hello Everyone,

We wanted to evaluate the market and ask our fellow customers whether a Mini-Rig operating
at 25 GH/s and priced at half price (15K$) and consuming around 1.2KW would be something they
consider or not.

All suggestions/ideas/opinions are welcome.


Regards,
BFL


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: deepceleron on March 17, 2012, 12:44:48 PM
You need to design something that is below 1500w current draw, so it can be used on a normal household circuit. With the 5x more power usage per hash than your original specification, "rigbox" can't be plugged into anything beyond a specialized circuit with a high-amperage nema plug.

You should have a rackmount backplane that can take single-equivalent cards, so a "blade server" can come with a few, and be upgradeable to ~20. With adequate cooling blowing in the right direction.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: worldinacoin on March 17, 2012, 12:48:23 PM
I think that you may try to setup a hire purchase scheme, 15k is quite a lot of money to fork out.  Also how are we going to be sure on the warranty part


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: nedbert9 on March 17, 2012, 12:53:47 PM

A smaller rig unit under 1800w would be a plus.  ~15k would increase the market.

Any additional MH/w enhancement would be spectacular.



Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: jamesg on March 17, 2012, 01:16:15 PM
Hello Everyone,

We wanted to evaluate the market and ask our fellow customers whether a Mini-Rig operating
at 25 GH/s and priced at half price (15K$) and consuming around 1.2KW would be something they
consider or not.

All suggestions/ideas/opinions are welcome.


Reagrds,
BFL

I'll take 4 please.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Fefox on March 17, 2012, 02:29:41 PM
Very Interested, (as soon as my rigbox is delivered)


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: siggy on March 17, 2012, 03:38:39 PM
Hello Everyone,

We wanted to evaluate the market and ask our fellow customers whether a Mini-Rig operating
at 25 GH/s and priced at half price (15K$) and consuming around 1.2KW would be something they
consider or not.

All suggestions/ideas/opinions are welcome.


Reagrds,
BFL


translation:  Holy crap are we having difficulty keeping the Rig cool.  Can't just add a fan to the bottom this time.  While we work on this, lets rip out half the cores and cut the price in half.

And YES, I'll be interested.  At 25K you were right at the bleeding edge of my avaliable funds.  At 30K I'm priced out.  At 15K (even for half the performance) I'll definately be buying one.

Sigg


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: malevolent on March 17, 2012, 03:55:00 PM
Hello Everyone,

We wanted to evaluate the market and ask our fellow customers whether a Mini-Rig operating
at 25 GH/s and priced at half price (15K$) and consuming around 1.2KW would be something they
consider or not.

All suggestions/ideas/opinions are welcome.


Reagrds,
BFL


If this is the price after taxes/duties/shipping to EU countries (or you manage to ship from EU) I'll be interested.
EDIT: You HAVE to provide decent warranty. That means at least 24 months, this is the min. what GPU manufacturers provide. Note that GPUs are possible to resell if bitcoin crashes again or to use for other tasks apart from mining.

You need to design something that is below 1500w current draw, so it can be used on a normal household circuit. With the 5x more power usage per hash than your original specification, "rigbox" can't be plugged into anything beyond a specialized circuit with a high-amperage nema plug.

Sure it can, depends on where you live. We have 16A 230V household citcuits here.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Fiyasko on March 17, 2012, 03:57:23 PM
It would be Stupid for BFL to build one that uses >1500Watts
Nobody on the western half of the world would want one, Because they'd have to unplug a furnace or something just to run it.

a "mini rig box"? FUCK YES, ID DEFINITLY PURCHASE THAT IF I HAD THE MONEY.
A BFL Cube? FUUUUUUUUUuuuuuu i need one.
a rigbox? Frigoff, Im not rewiring my house


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: PulsedMedia on March 17, 2012, 04:03:45 PM
My mining operation is rather small even after current upgrades, but priced at 15k $ i might be able to justify the cost come next winter, 25-30k $ definitively not.
Also depends upon warranty (and insurance terms) i can get for the device.
But if i decide to go for it, expect steady purchases for new ones every few months.

and yeah around 1500W is the sweetspot, can have 2x on 16A circuit. Then again, almost all industrial + DC circuits around here are 25A.
Some offices have only 10A. The gap can be filled with FPGA miners or Sngles ;D


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Gomeler on March 17, 2012, 04:16:46 PM
I'd like to see something in the $5k range.  This way I can..

1) spread them out
2) if one goes down I don't lose all production
3) expand the farm more often



Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: this time on March 17, 2012, 04:46:45 PM
Will these be stand alone units with ethernet or will they have to be usb connected to a computer?


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: rjk on March 17, 2012, 04:53:05 PM
If you could have a 1500 watt PSU at 120 VAC, but only be using 80% or less of its capacity, that would be an excellent sweet spot, because that would be just right for a common 15 amp US circuit. Any more than that and people would have to use less common 20 amp circuits.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Jaryu on March 17, 2012, 05:21:08 PM
Hello Everyone,

We wanted to evaluate the market and ask our fellow customers whether a Mini-Rig operating
at 25 GH/s and priced at half price (15K$) and consuming around 1.2KW would be something they
consider or not.

All suggestions/ideas/opinions are welcome.


Reagrds,
BFL


if you can deliver it in the next few weeks, I'll take one. if you guys can stick it into a 1u case all the better, would make storing those things much easier here in the garage.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Scared on March 17, 2012, 06:05:27 PM
Hello Everyone,

We wanted to evaluate the market and ask our fellow customers whether a Mini-Rig operating
at 25 GH/s and priced at half price (15K$) and consuming around 1.2KW would be something they
consider or not.

All suggestions/ideas/opinions are welcome.


Reagrds,
BFL


I'd buy it today since I'm moving in the direction of FPGA. I've already bought 10 singles from you and I get $0.75 per Mhash on them. What your proposing would bring my cost down to $0.60 and who doesn't like to pay less. It's only marginally more expensive then the RigBox at $0.56. Btw I don't have to pay for electricity so I don't factor in that cost in my decisions.

Since you don't provide a warranty and there's no idea how long these boards will last before failure it's hard to invest in them. I would really like to see you guys provide a warranty on your products. It would also help if we knew what value they have outside of Bitcoin mining. Your website says they have other uses but I can't find any information on it.

Thanks for a great product and I look forward to the Mini-Rig!






Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: rjk on March 17, 2012, 06:17:55 PM
I'd buy it today since I'm moving in the direction of FPGA. I've already bought 10 singles from you and I get $0.75 per Mhash on them. What your proposing would bring my cost down to $0.60 and who doesn't like to pay less. It's only marginally more expensive then the RigBox at $0.56. Btw I don't have to pay for electricity so I don't factor in that cost in my decisions.

Since you don't provide a warranty and there's no idea how long these boards will last before failure it's hard to invest in them. I would really like to see you guys provide a warranty on your products. It would also help if we knew what value they have outside of Bitcoin mining. Your website says they have other uses but I can't find any information on it.

Thanks for a great product and I look forward to the Mini-Rig!
The singles have a 6 month warranty, which is longer than any other similar product with the exception of Ztex's 2 year warranty.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: abbeytim on March 17, 2012, 06:23:49 PM
why dont you worry about just getting the singles out not all of us have them yet that ordered them


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: malevolent on March 17, 2012, 06:43:53 PM
The singles have a 6 month warranty, which is longer than any other similar product with the exception of Ztex's 2 year warranty.

GPUs have 2 years to lifetime warranties.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: rjk on March 17, 2012, 06:46:07 PM
The singles have a 6 month warranty, which is longer than any other similar product with the exception of Ztex's 2 year warranty.

GPUs have 2 years to lifetime warranties.
I was just correcting his statement of "no warranty at all".


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: awigaxeh-443 on March 17, 2012, 06:48:12 PM
I think you should work on the singles producing 1 gigahash, most people do not have thousands of dollars to spend on 1 unit but would rather build upon each unit that they buy.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: DeathAndTaxes on March 17, 2012, 07:11:09 PM
Given the rig box as specified requires 2 power supplies and multiple boards I never understood the reason for making it a single unit.

50.4 GH/s @ 2500W requiring two powersupplies for $30K
vs
25 GH/s @ 1200W requiring a single powersupply for $15K

Just make the "smaller" one and sell two to the people who ordered the "original rigbox".


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: jothan on March 17, 2012, 07:24:52 PM
Another idea is to have a blade-like rack in which you put in compute units. It would be possible to buy the base box for ~5000$ with a few units and then add other cards as needed.

Of course, this makes cooling quite a bit more difficult, but it would lower the barrier to entry by quite a bit.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: awigaxeh-443 on March 17, 2012, 07:28:42 PM
lmao they already doing that with singles


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: trouserless on March 17, 2012, 07:31:26 PM
Another idea is to have a blade-like rack in which you put in compute units. It would be possible to buy the base box for ~5000$ with a few units and then add other cards as needed.

Of course, this makes cooling quite a bit more difficult, but it would lower the barrier to entry by quite a bit.

+1 this would be ideal for this product.  Right-size for all (serious) budgets.  They don't need to be hot-plug and would allow for mixed generations of FPGA boards in the future.  Of course this means more R&D into the "chassis" which would mean we won't see if for some time...


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Dhomochevsky on March 17, 2012, 09:47:18 PM
15k aren't change, but I would probably find a way to fork them over for that kind of hashing power and electric efficiency. The Rig Box was something that I wouldn't have considered buying very soon due to a high cost to pay all at once, not to mention the power draw - a bit high for my currently available circuits.

I also subscribe to the blade rack idea presented above - the more modular the better.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Pipesnake on March 17, 2012, 09:50:41 PM
You need to design something that is below 1500w current draw, so it can be used on a normal household circuit. With the 5x more power usage per hash than your original specification, "rigbox" can't be plugged into anything beyond a specialized circuit with a high-amperage nema plug.
Agreed.  If you're going to use a 240 volt line you might as well run the full Rigbox.  1500 watts is too close to constantly tripping breakers on a standard 15 amp circuit.  1200 watts would be ideal.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: jamesg on March 17, 2012, 09:51:59 PM
Just make the "smaller" one and sell two to the people who ordered the "original rigbox".

I would be OK with this for my pervious orders of the rig box.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: wogaut on March 17, 2012, 09:59:05 PM
I was already wondering when this would come up.

1650W max @ 110V, otherwise I can't place it anywhere.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: simonk83 on March 17, 2012, 10:02:55 PM
Yep, this is a better idea than the full rigbox I reckon.   As already mentioned, better two of these with dedicated power supplies than 1 big box that requires 2 PSU's.

I'd be interested :)


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Pipesnake on March 17, 2012, 10:08:43 PM
1650W max @ 110V, otherwise I can't place it anywhere.
1650 is too much on a standard household circuit.  Unless you have properly installed (and new wiring) with NOTHING else on the circuit it's going to trip multiple times per day.  1500 is definitely the max.  1200-1250 would be the perfect amount and leave enough of a cushion in case you accidentally place a fan or tv on the same circuit.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: rjk on March 17, 2012, 11:34:28 PM
1650W max @ 110V, otherwise I can't place it anywhere.
1650 is too much on a standard household circuit.  Unless you have properly installed (and new wiring) with NOTHING else on the circuit it's going to trip multiple times per day.  1500 is definitely the max.  1200-1250 would be the perfect amount and leave enough of a cushion in case you accidentally place a fan or tv on the same circuit.
Technically, a 15 amp circuit supports a max of 1800 watts - but that is the "burst" rating, and must be reduced (derated)  to 80% of that for continuous loads. Therefore, 1440 watts continuous maximum.



Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Pipesnake on March 17, 2012, 11:38:04 PM
1650W max @ 110V, otherwise I can't place it anywhere.
1650 is too much on a standard household circuit.  Unless you have properly installed (and new wiring) with NOTHING else on the circuit it's going to trip multiple times per day.  1500 is definitely the max.  1200-1250 would be the perfect amount and leave enough of a cushion in case you accidentally place a fan or tv on the same circuit.
Technically, a 15 amp circuit supports a max of 1800 watts - but that is the "burst" rating, and must be reduced (derated)  to 80% of that for continuous loads. Therefore, 1440 watts continuous maximum.
I concur.  That's why 1200-1250 is ideal.  Leaves room for less-than-optimum wiring and or sub-standard circuits and/or something accidentally getting plugged in on the circuit (most people don't know exactly what outlet goes to which circuit -- unless you built or wired your own house).


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: CleverMiner on March 18, 2012, 12:24:03 AM
I'd hope your PSUs are user replaceable ATX psu.

Some server PSU are great for the price but they're harder to find.

I'd definitively get one at 15k


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: jamesg on March 18, 2012, 12:34:14 AM
I'd hope your PSUs are user replaceable ATX psu.

Some server PSU are great for the price but they're harder to find.

I'd definitively get one at 15k

They have decided to go with 1500w ATX PSUs from what Inaba said....

BFL-Engineer, can you confirm this?


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: chungenhung on March 18, 2012, 03:35:32 AM
why dont you worry about just getting the singles out not all of us have them yet that ordered them
agreed! i've ordered a month ago and not a single email.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: benjamindees on March 18, 2012, 03:52:19 AM
So I'm guessing, based on the figures quoted, that those of you considering this have a price target of over $10/BTC ?


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: triplehelix on March 18, 2012, 03:58:22 AM
So I'm guessing, based on the figures quoted, that those of you considering this have a price target of over $10/BTC ?

what math leads you there?


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: benjamindees on March 18, 2012, 04:17:24 AM
Well, basically, turning a profit before the block reward halves...


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: jamesg on March 18, 2012, 10:45:33 AM
Well, basically, turning a profit before the block reward halves...

Better get your calculator back out.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Otoh on March 18, 2012, 12:04:02 PM
following with interest, this would be a good spot power/price wise for me


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Chomp on March 18, 2012, 10:26:26 PM
I'd like to see something in the $5k range.  This way I can..

1) spread them out
2) if one goes down I don't lose all production
3) expand the farm more often



+1 I'll take two please


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: BlackPrapor on March 19, 2012, 02:05:49 PM
I was planning to rewire my house anyway, but having being able to use mini rig boxes anywhere else gives me mobility. So, yes I'll definitively order MRB instead. It also gives a better scalability.
+1 for blade server casing idea.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Epoch on March 19, 2012, 02:06:19 PM
We wanted to evaluate the market and ask our fellow customers whether a Mini-Rig operating
at 25 GH/s and priced at half price (15K$) and consuming around 1.2KW would be something they
consider or not.

All suggestions/ideas/opinions are welcome.

Very interested in this. At $15k it is a much more flexible option and I suspect you would get more uptake than the $30k units.

One thing: as has been mentioned a few times here, it is important that this be able to run continuously on a 'regular' household circuit. For continuous use it must be derated to 80%. For North America, that is 15Ax120V (1800W) * 0.8 = 1440W. If it can run within that envelope, it can be run in any household.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: rjk on March 19, 2012, 02:10:57 PM
We wanted to evaluate the market and ask our fellow customers whether a Mini-Rig operating
at 25 GH/s and priced at half price (15K$) and consuming around 1.2KW would be something they
consider or not.

All suggestions/ideas/opinions are welcome.

Very interested in this. At $15k it is a much more flexible option and I suspect you would get more uptake than the $30k units.

One thing: as has been mentioned a few times here, it is important that this be able to run continuously on a 'regular' household circuit. For continuous use it must be derated to 80%. For North America, that is 15Ax120V (1800W) * 0.8 = 1440W. If it can run within that envelope, it can be run in any household.
I think it will. Any builder knows that a PSU really shouldn't be running at more than 80% of full load continuously, which in this case is 80% of 1500 watts (1200 watts). Assuming they stick to this, power won't be a problem.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: DeathAndTaxes on March 19, 2012, 02:23:57 PM
I think it will. Any builder knows that a PSU really shouldn't be running at more than 80% of full load continuously, which in this case is 80% of 1500 watts (1200 watts). Assuming they stick to this, power won't be a problem.

Says who?  Rated power is rated power.  "50% rule", "80% rule" are pure nonsense.  People need to stop babying their power supply.  Run it at full power.  If it is solid (Seasonic, XFX, Corsair, etc) it will run for years at 100% load.  If it is a piece of shit well then RMA it, and break it again, and RMA it, and break it again, and RMA it, and break it again and RMA it.  Post of forums that it is a piece of shit, give it 1 egg on newegg, make a blog about how company xyz rips off customers.

Rated power is rated power.  If a PSU can't put out more than 1000W CONTINUALLY then it should be rated at 1000W not 1200W.  Consumers that baby the suppliers only subsidize substandard products.

I mean it would be like someone selling you a sports car which has a top speed of 160 mph but if you drive it faster than 80 mph it explodes and people say "dude everyone knows not to drive a sports car faster than 50% of rated speed).  It is just as foolish to hold PSU to the same low standard.

Semi offtopic rant aside, the listed spec for RigBox is ~2500W so a 50% unit would likely be ~1250W.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: rjk on March 19, 2012, 02:36:13 PM
I think it will. Any builder knows that a PSU really shouldn't be running at more than 80% of full load continuously, which in this case is 80% of 1500 watts (1200 watts). Assuming they stick to this, power won't be a problem.

Says who?  Rated power is rated power.  "50% rule", "80% rule" are pure nonsense.  People need to stop babying their power supply.  Run it at full power.  If it is solid (Seasonic) it will run for years at 100% load.  If it is a piece of shit well then RMA it, and break it again, and RMA it, and break it again, and RMA it, and break it again and RMA it.  Post of forums that it is a piece of shit, give it 1 egg on newegg, make a blog about how company xyz rips off customers.

Rated power is rated power.  If a PSU can't put out more than 1000W CONTINUALLY then it should be rated at 1000W not 1200W.  Consumers that baby the suppliers only subsidize substandard products.

I mean it would be like someone selling you a sports car which has a top speed of 160 mph but if you drive it faster than 80 mph it explodes and people say "dude everyone knows not to drive a sports car faster than 50% of rated speed).  It is just as foolish to hold PSU to the same low standard.

Semi offtopic rant aside, the listed spec for RigBox is ~2500W so a 50% unit would likely be ~1250W.
Very good. But my reasoning wasn't reliability, it was efficiency. The curves on most if not all PSUs go all to shit when running under 25% or over 80%.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: DeathAndTaxes on March 19, 2012, 02:42:08 PM
Very good. But my reasoning wasn't reliability, it was efficiency. The curves on most if not all PSUs go all to shit when running under 25% or over 80%.

There isn't much difference for anything 80-Plus rated.  For example Seasonic 1250W unit.

I hope I don't sound like a SeaSonic sale rep but here is my favorite mining rig PSU:
http://www.plugloadsolutions.com/psu_reports/SEA%20SONIC_SS-1250XM_ECOS%202811_1250W_Report.pdf

100% load - 88.7% efficiency
80% load - 89.8% efficiency
50% load - 91.4% efficiency
20% load - 89.8% efficiency

Also look at the "curve" it is almost a flat line compared to the bell curve shaped efficiency curves of a decade ago.  80-Plus may be imperfect and sometimes a lot of marketing but it has widened the "sweet spot" of PSU load curves.

IF SeaSonic says it is good for 1250W @ 120F well I am going to find out. :)  If it can't do that they shouldn't say it.  Given they have 5 year warranty they have a lot more to lose than me by over promising.

That being said loading to 80% isn't "bad".  It gives you a little headroom as the PSU ages.   It is a lot better than the "50% rule" nonsense which was common around here even just a year ago.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: BlackPrapor on March 19, 2012, 02:46:45 PM
I think it will. Any builder knows that a PSU really shouldn't be running at more than 80% of full load continuously, which in this case is 80% of 1500 watts (1200 watts). Assuming they stick to this, power won't be a problem.

Says who?  Rated power is rated power.  "50% rule", "80% rule" are pure nonsense.  People need to stop babying their power supply.  Run it at full power.  If it is solid (Seasonic) it will run for years at 100% load.  If it is a piece of shit well then RMA it, and break it again, and RMA it, and break it again, and RMA it, and break it again and RMA it.  Post of forums that it is a piece of shit, give it 1 egg on newegg, make a blog about how company xyz rips off customers.

Rated power is rated power.  If a PSU can't put out more than 1000W CONTINUALLY then it should be rated at 1000W not 1200W.  Consumers that baby the suppliers only subsidize substandard products.

I mean it would be like someone selling you a sports car which has a top speed of 160 mph but if you drive it faster than 80 mph it explodes and people say "dude everyone knows not to drive a sports car faster than 50% of rated speed).  It is just as foolish to hold PSU to the same low standard.

Semi offtopic rant aside, the listed spec for RigBox is ~2500W so a 50% unit would likely be ~1250W.
Very good. But my reasoning wasn't reliability, it was efficiency. The curves on most if not all PSUs go all to shit when running under 25% or over 80%.
It's usually a couple percent less than the best it can do. And the best it can do is usually with around 70-80% load. If 2-3% efficiency is a lot for you, then you should buy Enermax Platimax PSU, and run it on 70% load - you should get around 94-95% efficiency.....for a hell of a lot of money, it will pay out when your grand children get their mortgage paid out.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: rjk on March 19, 2012, 02:51:55 PM
It's usually a couple percent less than the best it can do. And the best it can do is usually with around 70-80% load. If 2-3% efficiency is a lot for you, then you should buy Enermax Platimax PSU, and run it on 70% load - you should get around 94-95% efficiency.....for a hell of a lot of money, it will pay out when your grand children get their mortgage paid out.
This is true. However, that 2-3% efficiency shows up as reasonably substantial additional heat which a) can reduce the expected lifespan in the case of cheaper PSUs, and b) must be dealt with on the cooling side of things.

I tend to think in datacenter size proportions, so I consider efficiency carefully, factor in lifespan and ease of replacement, and sprinkle on some actual cost later. This will not usually apply to most users.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: BlackPrapor on March 19, 2012, 02:55:02 PM
It's usually a couple percent less than the best it can do. And the best it can do is usually with around 70-80% load. If 2-3% efficiency is a lot for you, then you should buy Enermax Platimax PSU, and run it on 70% load - you should get around 94-95% efficiency.....for a hell of a lot of money, it will pay out when your grand children get their mortgage paid out.
This is true. However, that 2-3% efficiency shows up as reasonably substantial additional heat which a) can reduce the expected lifespan in the case of cheaper PSUs, and b) must be dealt with on the cooling side of things.

I tend to think in datacenter size proportions, so I consider efficiency carefully, factor in lifespan and ease of replacement, and sprinkle on some actual cost later. This will not usually apply to most users.

You're right, but paying double price for a few more % is ridiculous at least (I'm talking about Platinum series PSU's)


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: rjk on March 19, 2012, 03:00:22 PM
You're right, but paying double price for a few more % is ridiculous at least (I'm talking about Platinum series PSU's)
I'll just leave this here: http://www.plugloadsolutions.com/psu_reports/DELL_D750E-S2_750W_SO-386_Report.pdf
The one and only Titanium rated PSU, at better than 96% efficiency. Can't find it for sale anywhere, but I wonder what it will cost in a few years when it gets removed from decommissioned servers.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Epoch on March 19, 2012, 03:04:01 PM
Very good. But my reasoning wasn't reliability, it was efficiency. The curves on most if not all PSUs go all to shit when running under 25% or over 80%.

There isn't much difference for anything 80-Plus rated.  For example Seasonic 1250W unit.

I hope I don't sound like a SeaSonic sale rep but here is my favorite mining rig PSU:
http://www.plugloadsolutions.com/psu_reports/SEA%20SONIC_SS-1250XM_ECOS%202811_1250W_Report.pdf

100% load - 88.7% efficiency
80% load - 89.8% efficiency
50% load - 91.4% efficiency
20% load - 89.8% efficiency

Excellent supply, and a good example of why load does not significantly affect efficiency with today's 80PLUS designs. My 'go to' supply is the OCZ Z850. Similar numbers to the 1250XM above (perhaps ~0.5% less across the board), but where the Seasonic costs $250; I can often get the Z850 for $100. The additional 50% capacity of the 1250XM is welcome (and sometimes necessary, depending on your requirements), but the extra $150 is reason to pause.

For mini-Rig purposes: 1250W is about as high as you can get for a 'household outlet' supply (1250/90% is about 1390W at the wall, which is near the continuous limit of 1440W), so if the mini-Rig will use something like this it would be fine.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: allten on March 19, 2012, 03:16:40 PM
Still waiting for my single.
Get that delivered then lets talk.

For the rig box, I've been waiting to buy a 1/4 of one with another miner(s).
That's where I see it going for many.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: WhitePhantom on March 19, 2012, 06:33:17 PM
Just make the "smaller" one and sell two to the people who ordered the "original rigbox".

I would be OK with this for my pervious orders of the rig box.

I would also be happy with two Mini-Rigs instead of the one Rig Box I ordered.  Whatever BFL decides to do is fine with me.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: chungenhung on March 19, 2012, 07:52:03 PM
Still waiting for my single.
Get that delivered then lets talk.

For the rig box, I've been waiting to buy a 1/4 of one with another miner(s).
That's where I see it going for many.
this


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: PulsedMedia on March 20, 2012, 02:17:27 AM
You're right, but paying double price for a few more % is ridiculous at least (I'm talking about Platinum series PSU's)

Let's assume system with 6x7970 underclocked and undervolted, that is something like 900-1000W usage, let's say 1kW exact.

Enermax platinum costs 330$ for 1200W unit, and seasonic costs 270$
They are running at 83% load.

Enermax report: http://www.plugloadsolutions.com/psu_reports/ENERMAX_EPM1200EWT_ECOS%202585_1200W_Report.pdf
Enermax is actually above 90% still on this load, let's say it's close to it's average of 90.62% at 90.3%

So let's say seasonic does 89.6% (load just above 80% so take just a notch off from 89.9%)

Seasonic usage: 1116W
Enermax usage: 1107W

It's less than 1% difference across the board.

For the dell 750W Platinum at ~400W usage i wouldn't mind paying the extra tho!
6% difference!
24W over a year does add up to 209kWh or around 25-28€ for me.
and it still uses a tiny inefficient high wattage fan oO;


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: dave3 on March 20, 2012, 05:16:09 AM
It's unlikely I'd purchase one, but I do think it's a good idea for those interested in larger systems.

I'll go for a small cluster of Singles (but probably no more than 10-12).


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: kjlimo on March 20, 2012, 08:12:48 AM
I'm increasingly talking with co-workers & friends to get an investment club to buy one of these things...

However, I feel like I would want to fly to Butterfly labs and negotiate in person.  For a purchase of $15,000 or $30,000 for two, I would want to have a one on one meeting to discuss delivery timing and expectations.

If they have enough random people buying them online with no interaction other than e-mail, then I guess they don't need my money, but this would be a condition of mine before I put my (and my friend's) money down.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: finway on March 20, 2012, 08:21:48 AM
What a crazy world!  :'(


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: mrb on March 20, 2012, 05:30:26 PM
BFL-Engineer, I would recommend to size the mini-rig either for 960W, or 1920W.
This way, either 1 or 2 could be placed on a standard 120V-20A circuit, while drawing no more than 80% of its rated capacity per the National Electric Code (1920W).


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: DeathAndTaxes on March 20, 2012, 05:33:39 PM
BFL-Engineer, I would recommend to size the mini-rig either for 960W, or 1920W.
This way, either 1 or 2 could be placed on a standard 120V-20A circuit, while drawing no more than 80% of its rated capacity per the National Electric Code (1920W).

Given 99% of NEMA outlets in US residences are 15A variety why make it smaller but too large to fit on a single outlet.  Seems like the worst possible "compromise".  Keeping it under 1440W(well 1.5 KW) makes it work with virtually every outlet in the world.

Granted dedicated outlets are possible but if you are going to use dedicated outlets then current is no issue.  They could make it 5KW and it would still work fine on a 30A 240V circuit.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: silverbox on March 20, 2012, 05:41:38 PM
Most circuits are 20A for outlets, Easy enuf to swap one 15A outlet wtih a Nema 5-20 to get the full 20A on one connector.

Its like a $3 dollar part at the depot.

http://www.homedepot.com/h_d1/N-25ecodZ5yc1v/R-202066702/h_d2/ProductDisplay?catalogId=10053&langId=-1&keyword=20-amp


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: mrb on March 20, 2012, 05:44:08 PM
I am pretty sure 20A is more common than 15A, at least in all US residences built in the last few decades. My 30-year old apartment building has 20A circuits in the units. My office has 20A circuits. My previous apt had 20A circuits.

Anyway, perhaps the mini-rig should be sized for 640W. One could run 2 per 15A circuit with 160W headroom (eg. in an old residence where the circuit might be shared by a lightbulb). Or 3 per 20A circuit with no headroom (for those operating them on dedicated circuits).


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: DeathAndTaxes on March 20, 2012, 05:48:24 PM
Most circuits are 20A for outlets, Easy enuf to swap one 15A outlet wtih a Nema 5-20 to get the full 20A on one connector.

Its like a $3 dollar part at the depot.

http://www.homedepot.com/h_d1/N-25ecodZ5yc1v/R-202066702/h_d2/ProductDisplay?catalogId=10053&langId=-1&keyword=20-amp outlet&storeId=10051

It is also a good way to start a residence fire not covered by insurance due to code violation and gross negligence.

NEMA 5-15 outlets are often wired using 14 gauge wire and connected to a 15A breaker.  Changing the outlet does nothing as the breaker will trip at 15A.  Changing the outlet and breaker is dangerous and a code violation as 14 gauge wire is only rated for 15A.  Changing the outlet, breaker, and wiring is possible but dubious.  You might as well run a dedicated circuit.  If you run a dedicated circuit going 240V makes more sense anyways.  You get double the capacity and higher efficiency.

It is possible that someone has a 15A outlet on 12 gauge wiring but that isn't the norm.  12 gauge is more expensive and builders often don't sink lots of cost into heavier wiring as it is kinda hard to sell that once the walls are up.  Suggesting they can just buy a new outlet is just reckless.  One needs to ensure the entire circuit (device, plug, outlet, wiring, and breaker) is rated for 20A.





Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: silverbox on March 20, 2012, 05:51:28 PM
Again most outlet circuits in the US are on 20A breakers with 12 AWG romex (yellow).  Its easy enuf to check and see if its a 14 AWG romex (white), 15A breaker circuit, but usually those are lighting circuits, not outlets.  If its not 20A breaker with 12 AWG, then don't put a 5-20 outlet on it..


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: silverbox on March 20, 2012, 05:59:20 PM


It is possible that someone has a 15A outlet on 12 gauge wiring but that isn't the norm.  12 gauge is more expensive and builders often don't sink lots of cost into heavier wiring as it is kinda hard to sell that once the walls are up.  

This just isn't true, on a 20A circuit your allowed 13 duplex 15A outlets, whereas on a 15A circuit your only allowed 10 duplex 15A outlets.  The cost of the extra home runs with 14AWG romex on outlet circuits and the extra labor involved makes it more expensive then running 12AWG romex.  


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Epoch on March 20, 2012, 06:27:14 PM
BFL-Engineer, I would recommend to size the mini-rig either for 960W, or 1920W.
This way, either 1 or 2 could be placed on a standard 120V-20A circuit, while drawing no more than 80% of its rated capacity per the National Electric Code (1920W).

While 120V@20A circuits may very well be 'standard', they are far from common in North American households. What is both standard and common is 120V@15A (1800W peak, 1440W continuous).

Targeting 120V@20A circuits would severely limit the potential market for BFL. Clearly not a good business decision.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Inaba on March 20, 2012, 06:41:59 PM
Quote
Again most outlet circuits in the US are on 20A breakers with 12 AWG romex (yellow).  Its easy enuf to check and see if its a 14 AWG romex (white), 15A breaker circuit, but usually those are lighting circuits, not outlets.  If its not 20A breaker with 12 AWG, then don't put a 5-20 outlet on it..

This is just silly.  I see very few 20A installs in existing structures and even new structures, it's somewhat rare to see anything better than 14ga 15a.  Builders are some of the cheapest mother fuckers on earth and are scum right next to car salesmen and bankers.  They aren't going to spring for 12ga wire unless absolutely necessary.  15a, 14a is the "norm."  Even if you specify 12ga, 20a, unless you watch most builders like a hawk or do it yourself, you're likely to end up with 14ga wiring.



Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: DeathAndTaxes on March 20, 2012, 06:46:59 PM
Quote
Again most outlet circuits in the US are on 20A breakers with 12 AWG romex (yellow).  Its easy enuf to check and see if its a 14 AWG romex (white), 15A breaker circuit, but usually those are lighting circuits, not outlets.  If its not 20A breaker with 12 AWG, then don't put a 5-20 outlet on it..

This is just silly.  I see very few 20A installs in existing structures and even new structures, it's somewhat rare to see anything better than 14ga 15a.  Builders are some of the cheapest mother fuckers on earth and are scum right next to car salesmen and bankers.  They aren't going to spring for 12ga wire unless absolutely necessary.  15a, 14a is the "norm."

Exactly.  12A IS becoming more common in new construction mainly due to having more outlets in a room more desirable.  Still it is far from universal even in new construction and there are 100 million or so existing residences some with wiring 80 years old.  So I stand behind the statement that "saying just change the outlet is reckless".  

It is more like:
a) Check wiring is 12 gauge (replace if necessary).  If wiring is older than ~1970s it may not comply to any color code.  Remove section of wiring insulation to check gauge manually.
b) Ensure no other significant continual load is on the circuit (find all outlets on that circuit to verify)
c) Check breaker panel has a 20A breaker (replace if necessary)
d) Check existing outlets and ensure they don't have a current limit.  Many NEMA 5-15A outlets are not rated for 20A passthrough.  Rewire outlets using pigtails to bypass or replace all outlets on circuit if necessary
e) <Likely some more code gotcha here >
f) Go to home depot and buy that $3 outlet and replace.

f is the easy part but code compliance requires a through e.  Hardly universal or user friendly.  If BFL wanted consumer to do that they could simply keep it at 2.5 KW and require a dedicated circuit.  1440W (1.5KW is close enough) is universally compatible.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: silverbox on March 20, 2012, 06:57:11 PM
Quote
Again most outlet circuits in the US are on 20A breakers with 12 AWG romex (yellow).  Its easy enuf to check and see if its a 14 AWG romex (white), 15A breaker circuit, but usually those are lighting circuits, not outlets.  If its not 20A breaker with 12 AWG, then don't put a 5-20 outlet on it..

This is just silly.  I see very few 20A installs in existing structures and even new structures, it's somewhat rare to see anything better than 14ga 15a.  Builders are some of the cheapest mother fuckers on earth and are scum right next to car salesmen and bankers.  They aren't going to spring for 12ga wire unless absolutely necessary.  15a, 14a is the "norm."  Even if you specify 12ga, 20a, unless you watch most builders like a hawk or do it yourself, you're likely to end up with 14ga wiring.



I used to build custom houses (when there was a boom), lately its been additions and remodels.  I use yellow 12ga for everything.  I see more 20A outlet circuits then 15A, but hey i'm in California, most of our houses were built fairly recently, back east it might be a different story.  Knob and tube is probably still the standard back there eh?


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Glasswalker on March 20, 2012, 07:03:04 PM
I would like to pitch in on the idea for doing a blade server type approach.

Sell a chassis for something like $5K and then have inexpensive blades that can be added over time to increase hashing power. (up to a total price, fully populated of $15K for 25GHash of mining power roughly). This approach will open you up to a much larger market space, and allow people to ease into the investment more smoothly. Large one time investments tend to shatter the growth curve because of the significant cycle time between growth spurts. Solutions allowing constant growth provide a sharper growth curve, and better ROI to owners.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: siggy on March 20, 2012, 07:03:15 PM
Really guys?  You're going to base your purchase decision on "can I fit 1 or 2 or 3 on a 15/20 amp circuit" ..??   We're talking $15,000 here .. If you have a doubt, bring in an electrician to run a dedicated circuit.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: JWU42 on March 20, 2012, 07:06:12 PM
Really guys?  You're going to base your purchase decision on "can I fit 1 or 2 or 3 on a 15/20 amp circuit" ..??   We're talking $15,000 here .. If you have a doubt, bring in an electrician to run a dedicated circuit.

Amen brother...

I have 4 20amp dedicated circuits just waiting  ;D


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: triplehelix on March 20, 2012, 07:09:12 PM
we had a kitchen fire last month.  we are first floor apartment in a two family home.  the house is about 100 years old.  the kitchen in our apartment was redone approximately 20 years ago.  the drywall isn't up yet, and after reading this thread i went and took a look at the wiring.

the wiring that existed prior to the fire, both to my apartment and the wiring traveling to the upstairs residence, as well as the new wiring installed by the contracter doing the repairs, is all 12 gauge.

too small a sample size to draw any conclusions, but there you go.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Inaba on March 20, 2012, 07:26:59 PM
Usually a remodel will have better wiring.  New construction by builders = as cheap as they can possibly get without setting fire to the place prior to sale.  After sale = who cares!


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: rjk on March 20, 2012, 07:35:09 PM
Usually a remodel will have better wiring.  New construction by builders = as cheap as they can possibly get without setting fire to the place prior to sale.  After sale = who cares!
+1 for cookie cutter boxes, but many custom builders are a little more careful. I've experienced both, and unfortunately many of the inexpensive remodels are 14 with a mixture of knob and tube in some shoddy bungalows. Most of the build to order houses near me are all done up with 12 everywhere. Some (including ours) even have a 400 amp service entrance.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Cablez on March 20, 2012, 08:01:00 PM
All of the different apartments that I have lived in for the last 10 years (5+) were all 15A 14gauge circuits for receptacles and lighting.  The only 20A 12gauge circuits I have come across have been for specialized appliances (i.e. stoves, refrigerators, fake furnaces, etc). 

I would also suggest that BFL keep the wattage to fit on 15A circuits for a more mainstream application.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: tgmarks on March 20, 2012, 08:01:19 PM
I don't know about doing exactly what glasswalker described with a blade server, but I think he had the right idea in it being some type of modular design with a main board and housing.  I like the idea of this a lot, but $15k is a little hard for me to swallow right off the bat.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: JWU42 on March 20, 2012, 08:15:39 PM
Forgot to mention I applaud BFL for coming up with an offering (potentially) to compete price wise with LargeCoin...


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: mrb on March 21, 2012, 05:13:05 AM
Really guys?  You're going to base your purchase decision on "can I fit 1 or 2 or 3 on a 15/20 amp circuit" ..??   We're talking $15,000 here .. If you have a doubt, bring in an electrician to run a dedicated circuit.

It is about maximum utilization, and efficiency.

It does not matter if you buy only 1 rig. But the larger your scale, the more you should care about these details.

I would rather spend 1 or 2 grands in mining hardware than in installing extra circuits because the BFL designers chose an awkward wattage that prevents me from utilizing my circuits to their maximum capacity.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Gomeler on March 21, 2012, 05:48:15 AM
Really guys?  You're going to base your purchase decision on "can I fit 1 or 2 or 3 on a 15/20 amp circuit" ..??   We're talking $15,000 here .. If you have a doubt, bring in an electrician to run a dedicated circuit.

It is about maximum utilization, and efficiency.

It does not matter if you buy only 1 rig. But the larger your scale, the more you should care about these details.

I would rather spend 1 or 2 grands in mining hardware than in installing extra circuits because the BFL designers chose an awkward wattage that prevents me from utilizing my circuits to their maximum capacity.

This exactly. I'm already tired of balancing circuits to maintain 80% utilization. Something that REQUIRED a 20amp circuit would be a downer.

Still don't see why BFL wouldn't have a stepping stone build.. something in the 5-10 GH/s range would be perfect for the market of miners who already own 10-20 GH/s and want to expand to FPGA. But, I suppose this is just me wanting a product tailored to my price range and upgrade path.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Transisto on March 21, 2012, 06:09:15 AM
I"m in for one mini rig,

Know what you 15A worried guys gonna do ?

Convert your 110v outlet to a 220v by adding a breaker to the neutral and be done with it!

That's a 10min - cost nothing job. As said, we talking 15k$ per box ,,, just call an electrician !

Side note : My favorite PSUs are 750w because I can run 4 GPU on them and plug two on one 15A. (convenience)


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: rjk on March 21, 2012, 02:44:26 PM
Know what you 15A worried guys gonna do ?

Convert your 110v outlet to a 220v by adding a breaker to the neutral and be done with it!

That's a 10min - cost nothing job. As said, we talking 15k$ per box ,,, just call an electrician !

Sure. Just a few notes:

a) The breakers must have their handles tied together, per code. Easier to just get a dual pole breaker. Few bucks extra.
b) The neutral wire must be clearly marked on both ends to show that it is hot.
c) You must replace the wall outlet with a 240-only receptacle, such as 6-15R or 6-20R. Few more bucks.
    1) If the wiring is 14 gauge, you must use no more than a 15 amp dual breaker, and a 6-15R receptacle.
    2) If the wiring is 12 gauge, you must use no more than a 20 amp dual breaker, and a 6-20R receptacle.
d) This assumes that the rig supports 240v, which it should if it is using a standard PSU. You may need to chop off the plug end and install a 6-15P or 6-20P plug.

Hope this helps anyone that is planning to be cheap with their infrastructure upgrades. ;D



Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: guruvan on March 22, 2012, 09:46:58 PM
Have just ordered a single, and I'm very curious what the direct DC input requirements on this (and the full rig) are.

I'd be very interested in the mini rig, but would prefer a dc-only unit. We are running off the grid, and do not want to invert more power than necessary.




Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: P_Shep on March 22, 2012, 09:53:55 PM
12V 7A (ish)


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Inaba on March 23, 2012, 02:43:13 AM
If you are feeding it direct DC, it's 12v @6A


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: guruvan on March 23, 2012, 02:54:09 AM
LOL & thanks!

 I wasn't clear - by "this" , I meant the mini rig

the single is very straightforward.



Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: rjk on March 23, 2012, 02:58:30 AM
LOL & thanks!

 I wasn't clear - by "this" , I meant the mini rig

the single is very straightforward.


In that case speculation only, since it only exists on paper.

If I were to go out on a limb, I might assume they are using a standard ATX PSU, which you may be able to replace with a properly sized DC-DC converter. But at such high wattage, it would not likely be cost effective. However, you might be able to drive it with 12v directly, in which case I would assume it to be between 1200 and 1400 watts DC.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: guruvan on March 23, 2012, 03:56:03 AM
hmm. in most case inversion has higher up front costs, and more transmission loss, so I'm still thinking we can do better by not introducing AC into the box at all.

I did find some nice atx style redundant DC units - if it just has a standard atx we should be in business.  Waiting on a quote.

It would be super sweet to be able to order one of these dc, or w/o ac power.



Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: rjk on March 23, 2012, 01:03:17 PM
I did find some nice atx style redundant DC units - if it just has a standard atx we should be in business.  Waiting on a quote.
I'd be interested in what you found. As you noted, the conversions back and forth between AC and DC have fairly substantial losses, but I have never been able to find a cost effective DC-DC converter. I have an extremely powerful 48VDC power source, and that would be perfect if I could find sufficiently powerful DC-DC converter that doesn't cost too much.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: wknight on March 23, 2012, 02:35:39 PM
If you guys decide to do this I will be ordering one as long as I can get a decent turn around. Might even take two as I have a few possible investors at this price. The best of all these are Co-Workers that are very possible investors.



Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: JWU42 on March 23, 2012, 02:40:17 PM
If BFL could actually deliver products in 4-6 weeks they would be printing money  ;D


The uncertainty of delivery is a major obstacle right now despite their very compelling ROI (so long as power costs are < $.20 Kwh).


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: fulepp on March 23, 2012, 07:37:01 PM
This concept sounds good. I am interested to buy one of these.

Before that i would like to know:
- can we get at least 1 year warranty? The payback time of this is around 6 months (with the current exchange rate)
- can you ship from Europe? Custom would significantly increase the price of this unit.
- do you have a better delivery ETA? 12-15 weeks as it was projected in an e-mail would be too long...

Also, i would like to see a rack mountable design where we could push some extra cards for expansion.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Inaba on March 23, 2012, 07:38:07 PM
And a pony.  I want a pony, too.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: JWU42 on March 23, 2012, 07:39:15 PM
And a pony.  I want a pony, too.


Thanks for the laugh!


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: triplehelix on March 23, 2012, 07:41:54 PM
And a pony.  I want a pony, too.


i can see how a pony fits in with the list as a whole.  i do however think a more respectable warranty for an expensive piece of hardware is a reasonable request.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: fulepp on March 23, 2012, 08:04:45 PM
Inaba,

No thanks, not a big fun of the pony in the server room...

Do you know what is expected life time of these units? I don't understand why are you happy with the 6 month warranty. your device may die before you would see any profit from it...

The rest of the points maybe not important to you but i would like to see
a; improvement on the delivery time
b; thinking of costumers who want to ourder outside of USA.
c; see a modular design


And a pony.  I want a pony, too.



Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: stevegee58 on March 23, 2012, 08:12:25 PM
And a pony.  I want a pony, too.


OK.  This now a pony thread.  8)

http://r24.imgfast.net/users/2414/20/51/96/avatars/1-62.jpg


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: DeathAndTaxes on March 23, 2012, 08:13:57 PM
If they do include ponies you can be as cool as these guys ...

http://cdn3.sbnation.com/imported_assets/799615/Screenshot1.jpg


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: wogaut on March 23, 2012, 08:22:16 PM
Can we pleeeeeease get back on topic?

I'd like to read news about the Mini-Rig, no interest in ponies.



Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Agent Provocateur on March 23, 2012, 08:23:08 PM
a-lot-o-noise in this threat

http://i1264.photobucket.com/albums/jj488/spinegod/gifs2/horse.gif


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Inaba on March 23, 2012, 08:23:51 PM
I'm not saying I disagree with you.  Especially about the warranty... I agree that it should be 1 year.  The reasoning for a 6 month warranty is sound, as given by BFL... but it's also just as sound as warrantying it for a year if you agree with the entire premise.  So yeah, I agree.

The rest of the stuff, I also agree with, it's just been said a hundred times over already, which is what elicited the pony comment. Yes, we all want those things... and either we are getting them or not, but while we're wishing, lets wish for ponies!  



Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: DeathAndTaxes on March 23, 2012, 08:25:10 PM
Yeah lets get back to the topic of mining.

BFL if you include a pony it better be a mining pony.

http://www.amnh.org/exhibitions/horse/images/lg/06civ_wrk_pitpony.jpg

Obsolete by modern standards that PNY200 could mine 200 KC/D (kilo coals per day).  Those were the days when mining was tough.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: guruvan on March 23, 2012, 09:04:57 PM
I did find some nice atx style redundant DC units - if it just has a standard atx we should be in business. 
I'd be interested in what you found. As you noted, the conversions back and forth between AC and DC have fairly substantial losses, but I have never been able to find a cost effective DC-DC converter. I have an extremely powerful 48VDC power source, and that would be perfect if I could find sufficiently powerful DC-DC converter that doesn't cost too much.

Hmm. I think I misread the output power on what I was looking at last night. I'm not finding a big enough atx unit for this application, though, that's not the only way to skin the cat, and I'm sure I overlooked something.

I got confirmation on my order from Sonny today, and asked if he'd look into this possibility for me.

Here's a few links. I can't vouch for the quality of the products below. Most of these are more applicable to folks with larger mining ops.

Simple cheap wall mount converter (48v-12v)
http://www.neobits.com/innovative_circuit_ict4812_20a_converter_24_48_12v_20a_p2769556.html?atc=gbs

Powerstream carries a few ATX items, but the biggest I found was 750w
http://www.powerstream.com/dc-dc.htm

Here are a couple others, more of a telco power distribution framework setup - for a rack full of mini or full rigs:
http://www.unipowerco.com/redundant-server-power-supply
http://www.newmartelecom.com/DC-DC-Converters-Rackmount/Rackmount-DC-Converters.html



Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: WhitePhantom on March 23, 2012, 09:30:42 PM
Sonny allowed me to convert my rig box order to two mini-rigs.  That should work better for me since I can split the two into separate corporate data centers and avoid straining the A/C unit in just one data center.

As a side note, I plan to monitor my electricity usage and "pay back" my employer by using my personal credit card for an appropriate amount of IT purchases each month.

I wonder if adding 10% or 20% to the $.095/KWh would be sufficient for the extra A/C usage...


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: JWU42 on March 23, 2012, 09:41:24 PM
Sonny allowed me to convert my rig box order to two mini-rigs.  That should work better for me since I can split the two into separate corporate data centers and avoid straining the A/C unit in just one data center.

As a side note, I plan to monitor my electricity usage and "pay back" my employer by using my personal credit card for an appropriate amount of IT purchases each month.

I wonder if adding 10% or 20% to the $.095/KWh would be sufficient for the extra A/C usage...

Well - that would imply the mini-rig is not a concept but a product you can order?!?

Lemme guess 10-12 weeks  ;)


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: triplehelix on March 24, 2012, 12:40:06 AM
official confirmation of mini-rig availability from a BFL rep would be great, even if its labelled as a pre-announcement community preview leak.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: WhitePhantom on March 24, 2012, 03:19:38 AM
Sonny allowed me to convert my rig box order to two mini-rigs.  That should work better for me since I can split the two into separate corporate data centers and avoid straining the A/C unit in just one data center.

As a side note, I plan to monitor my electricity usage and "pay back" my employer by using my personal credit card for an appropriate amount of IT purchases each month.

I wonder if adding 10% or 20% to the $.095/KWh would be sufficient for the extra A/C usage...

Well - that would imply the mini-rig is not a concept but a product you can order?!?

Lemme guess 10-12 weeks  ;)

Sonny said my two mini-rigs will ship end of June, which is the same time my rig box was supposed to ship.  So...More like 13-14 weeks.  Long time to have $30k out there, but I think it'll be worth it.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: JWU42 on March 24, 2012, 12:21:30 PM
Best of luck to you...


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: kunibopl on March 24, 2012, 12:53:19 PM
I really hope for all of you, that you won't discover, there's something seriously wrong with BFL.
there are many things, that don't fit together:

- poor customer support despite huge sums involved
- false avdertisment regarding product specs in the beginning
- very slow delivery
- wrong delivery times
- no updates on mini-rig on website
- very few delivered pieces

I'd buy, but this scares me off.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: yxt on March 24, 2012, 02:22:44 PM
- poor customer support despite huge sums involved
- false avdertisment regarding product specs in the beginning
- very slow delivery
- wrong delivery times
- no updates on mini-rig on website
- very few delivered pieces

I'd buy, but this scares me off.

+1


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Inaba on March 24, 2012, 02:34:22 PM
Thanks for rehashing the same old tired "reasons" that have been stated 100 times before and everyone is already aware of.  Welcome to November 2011!


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: DeathAndTaxes on March 24, 2012, 03:31:52 PM
As someone who was an outspoken (and loud) critic of BFL I am convinced they aren't a "scam".  They masively overestimated their specs and timelines.  They also seem ill equipped to handle the non-tech portions of the demand they are facing.

IMHO the only real risks dealing w/ BFL are:
a) time risk.  800 MH/s miner earns ~15 BTC per month.  4 month delay = 60 BTC in lost revenue.
b) warranty risk.  If new orders take 12-16 weeks then how long will RMA take.
c) solvency risk. If company had a huge financial setback (say 1000 singles died under warranty) could they absorb that and continue to operate

basically the risks are the same as dealing with any small business where demand way outstrips productive capacity.  It would be smart for BFL to hire an business student (for next to nothing) to handle non-tech tasks like emails, order processing, releasing company statements, etc.

Psst BFL there is 10% unemployment right now (20%+ for college age workers), labor is cheap.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Epoch on March 24, 2012, 03:55:19 PM
As someone who was an outspoken (and loud) critic of BFL I am convinced they aren't a "scam".  They masively overestimated their specs and timelines.  They also seem ill equipped to handle the non-tech portions of the demand they are facing.

IMHO the only real risks dealing w/ BFL are:
a) time risk.  800 MH/s miner earns ~15 BTC per month.  4 month delay = 60 BTC in lost revenue.
b) warranty risk.  If new orders take 12-16 weeks then how long will RMA take.
c) solvency risk. If company had a huge financial setback (say 1000 singles died under warranty) could they absorb that and continue to operate

basically the risks are the same as dealing with any small business where demand way outstrips productive capacity.  It would be smart for BFL to hire an business student (for next to nothing) to handle non-tech tasks like emails, order processing, releasing company statements, etc.

Psst BFL there is 10% unemployment right now (20%+ for college age workers), labor is cheap.

Agreed. BFL has simply bit off more than they could chew.

Scale [a] up to a 25Ghps mini-rig and you have 1875 BTC ($8750) in lost revenue during that 4-month waiting period. Essentially your $15k mini-rig now costs you 55% more, or $23k (almost as much as the original 50.4Ghps full Rig Box). They really need to bring the delay between ORDER and DELIVERY way down.

Even on the Singles, they are still working to ship their December orders. 4-6 weeks isn't bad, if only it were true.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: triplehelix on March 24, 2012, 04:06:08 PM
to be honest, that's the biggest concern i have with BFL.  not the very short warranty, not any scam concerns, not the glaring lack of pony, but the fact that they require full payment for a product they won't deliver for an extended time after receiving full payment.

almost every analog i can think of, takes a deposit, but doesn't require full payment until the product is ready to ship.  sure some take incremental payments (generally at pre-established milestones), but again, final payment isn't due until the project/product is ready for delivery.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: jddebug on March 24, 2012, 05:48:48 PM
As someone who was an outspoken (and loud) critic of BFL I am convinced they aren't a "scam".  They masively overestimated their specs and timelines.  They also seem ill equipped to handle the non-tech portions of the demand they are facing.

IMHO the only real risks dealing w/ BFL are:
a) time risk.  800 MH/s miner earns ~15 BTC per month.  4 month delay = 60 BTC in lost revenue.
b) warranty risk.  If new orders take 12-16 weeks then how long will RMA take.
c) solvency risk. If company had a huge financial setback (say 1000 singles died under warranty) could they absorb that and continue to operate

basically the risks are the same as dealing with any small business where demand way outstrips productive capacity.  It would be smart for BFL to hire an business student (for next to nothing) to handle non-tech tasks like emails, order processing, releasing company statements, etc.

Psst BFL there is 10% unemployment right now (20%+ for college age workers), labor is cheap.

Agreed. BFL has simply bit off more than they could chew.

Scale [a] up to a 25Ghps mini-rig and you have 1875 BTC ($8750) in lost revenue during that 4-month waiting period. Essentially your $15k mini-rig now costs you 55% more, or $23k (almost as much as the original 50.4Ghps full Rig Box). They really need to bring the delay between ORDER and DELIVERY way down.

Even on the Singles, they are still working to ship their December orders. 4-6 weeks isn't bad, if only it were true.

Thats assuming you already have a way to get an $8750 return on your $15,000's over the next 4 months. Those kinds of returns are very few and associated with their own risks no doubt.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: DeathAndTaxes on March 24, 2012, 06:38:15 PM
Thats assuming you already have a way to get an $8750 return on your $15,000's over the next 4 months. Those kinds of returns are very few and associated with their own risks no doubt.

$15K in GPUs? :)


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: jamesg on March 24, 2012, 06:50:43 PM
Thats assuming you already have a way to get an $8750 return on your $15,000's over the next 4 months. Those kinds of returns are very few and associated with their own risks no doubt.

$15K in GPUs? :)

Surely no one is saying that they can get 25Gh of GPUs for $15k nor are they saying that they can have them up and running in a week, possibly even a month. From my own personal experience, it took more than 8 weeks to go from 5Gh to around 30Gh. And there are a lot of bumps in the road.

- waiting for newegg.com to get your packages to you because they don't deliver on Saturdays
- waiting for misc parts (powered risers, Dual GPU plugs, etc) that you happened to forget
- waiting on the electrician to get those 240v circuits you now need because you are pulling to many Kw
- figuring out (and spending money on) getting all of that heat out of the space all these GPUs are running in
- testing GPUs to get the max Mh/s out of them without dying every hour.
- all the other stuff with operating system, mining software, USB keys failing

You would need to either have free data center space available at a drop of the hat or already have a pretty serious farm running (therefore already knowing where you fucked up the first time) to be able to get 25Gh up and running "quickly". Even then, it is not an easy task.

My point is, to wait 8 weeks for two rig boxes does not bother me in the least because I am not delusional enough to think that BFL should be perfect or that it's a cake walk to get more GPUs running.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: BFL-Engineer on March 24, 2012, 06:54:43 PM
As someone who was an outspoken (and loud) critic of BFL I am convinced they aren't a "scam".  They masively overestimated their specs and timelines.  They also seem ill equipped to handle the non-tech portions of the demand they are facing.

IMHO the only real risks dealing w/ BFL are:
a) time risk.  800 MH/s miner earns ~15 BTC per month.  4 month delay = 60 BTC in lost revenue.
b) warranty risk.  If new orders take 12-16 weeks then how long will RMA take.
c) solvency risk. If company had a huge financial setback (say 1000 singles died under warranty) could they absorb that and continue to operate

basically the risks are the same as dealing with any small business where demand way outstrips productive capacity.  It would be smart for BFL to hire an business student (for next to nothing) to handle non-tech tasks like emails, order processing, releasing company statements, etc.

Psst BFL there is 10% unemployment right now (20%+ for college age workers), labor is cheap.


a) Regarding the Time risk, the delay was caused by changes in prototype, some Chinese holiday as
mentioned, and extended engineering to change the board from the Rev A (which you still can find its photos
on the Net). We're working very hard to reduce the delay to around 2 weeks for the singles and 4 weeks for Rigs
and Mini-Rigs.

b) Should it happen (which we haven't had any until today) That will be straight forward.

c) This solvency risk exists for everybody. Toyota is a very good example. We believe in our quality and
we won't ship until units behave as expected.


Good Luck



Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: JWU42 on March 25, 2012, 01:03:21 AM

My point is, to wait 8 weeks for two rig boxes does not bother me in the least because I am not delusional enough to think that BFL should be perfect or that it's a cake walk to get more GPUs running.

If we had faith in their lead times this would all be moot...

Singles are taking 14-16 weeks now.  They are saying NOTHING publicly about what has happened and why we SHOULD believe their current claims on delivery.  As D&T said, they need a PR person in the worst way.

Rig Box is 12-15 weeks per Sonny (according to e-mail this week).  I fear it is closer to 20...  :(

EDIT - Sent e-mail to Sonny on this topic and asking for confirmation on mini-rig.  Might as well ask these questions directly...


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: 1l1l11ll1l on March 25, 2012, 05:16:13 AM

My point is, to wait 8 weeks for two rig boxes does not bother me in the least because I am not delusional enough to think that BFL should be perfect or that it's a cake walk to get more GPUs running.

If we had faith in their lead times this would all be moot...

Singles are taking 14-16 weeks now.  They are saying NOTHING publicly about what has happened and why we SHOULD believe their current claims on delivery.  As D&T said, they need a PR person in the worst way.

Rig Box is 12-15 weeks per Sonny (according to e-mail this week).  I fear it is closer to 20...  :(

EDIT - Sent e-mail to Sonny on this topic and asking for confirmation on mini-rig.  Might as well ask these questions directly...

Similar situation with wicked lasers. They released the arctic, people paid, and months went by without delivery. Eventually all were delivered and they're continuing to innovate and deliver great lasers. BFL never went into this saying "in stock ready to ship" they went in with calculated estimations, those estimations were definitely high, but the moment they figured that out, they announced it lowered the price, and made design adjustments to accommodate higher power requirements. Sonny has always been prompt to reply to my questions, my first order was delivered and I've already got my second order in.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: JWU42 on March 25, 2012, 10:58:27 AM
Good e-mail exchange last evening  :)


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: kunibopl on March 25, 2012, 02:21:26 PM
Thanks for rehashing the same old tired "reasons" that have been stated 100 times before and everyone is already aware of.  Welcome to November 2011!


you miss one thing:

same old reasons since Nov, right, but if I'd run that company, I would have learned something in the last 4 month - they didn't.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Inaba on March 26, 2012, 12:33:19 PM
Thanks for rehashing the same old tired "reasons" that have been stated 100 times before and everyone is already aware of.  Welcome to November 2011!


you miss one thing:

same old reasons since Nov, right, but if I'd run that company, I would have learned something in the last 4 month - they didn't.

How is that missing anything?  It has nothing to do with the topic. The same old, tired arguments are trotted out.  Everyone is already aware of them.  OP is 6 months behind the times.  No one cares. End of story.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: kunibopl on March 26, 2012, 04:38:38 PM

How is that missing anything?  It has nothing to do with the topic. The same old, tired arguments are trotted out.  Everyone is already aware of them.  OP is 6 months behind the times.  No one cares. End of story.

I think many care, because it's hard to explain why BFL doesn't improve the support. it's their easiest way to improve their earnings.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Inaba on March 26, 2012, 05:00:47 PM
You misunderstand me.  Nobody cares about people posting the same old tired "reasons" again and again in the thread, like it's some revelation and only that person who posted was clever enough to figure it out.  Really... we don't care about revelations that were revealed 6 months ago.



Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: fulepp on March 26, 2012, 05:13:38 PM
Is there any information how the mini rig or the rig bix will look like? I am wondering what will be their phisical dimension, are they going to be expandable, etc.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: fulepp on March 26, 2012, 05:17:19 PM
Is there any information how the mini rig or the rig bix will look like? I am wondering what will be their phisical dimension, are they going to be expandable, etc.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: DeathAndTaxes on March 26, 2012, 05:36:59 PM
Is there any information how the mini rig or the rig bix will look like? I am wondering what will be their phisical dimension, are they going to be expandable, etc.

I wonder that myself.  I wonder how large it will need to be not because the FPGA take up a lot of space but due to the fact that 2.5KW is a lot of energy and the smaller the pkg the harder it is to cool.  

A visual excercise:
A 4x5970 rig is ~1KW.  Open framed it requires good amount of airflow to cool.   In a closed case, forget about it. :)  Now 1.25KW would be 20% more thermal load so image a hypothetical 5x5970 rig (pretend no 8 GPU limit). The "full rig box" (if it ends up getting built) would be double that.   To get an idea of the thermal energy vs volume visualize a 4U server chassis w/ 5x5970s inside now stack two of them on top of each other to simulate 2.5KW of power draw.  That is a pretty big box (8U = 14" by 19" by 24").  Could you cool that with air?
 How noisy would it be?  We already have a pretty large "rigbox".  Going larger would make it somewhat easier to cool.

Before I get flamed:
I am not saying the rigbox isn't more efficient.  It is.  The same sized box with the same amount of electricity/heat would produce 50 GH/s vs ~7 GH/s (10x 5970s). Still the laws of thermodynamics don't care what (or how much) the 2.5KW produced.  50GH/s on 2.5KW or 7GH/s on 2.5KW is still 2.5KW either way.  

That is an interesting challenge.  In mining the difficulty in cooling 1KW+ heat loads is what has lead to open frame rigs, extenders, extra high rpm fans, etc.  Will be interesting to see how they intend to cool them and how noisy they will be.  Not saying high potential noise is a problem (it isn't as most will be in datacenters or semi-industrial locations).  It just may shock some people who think of FPGA as silent and cool but that is just because nobody has scaled FPGA up to tens of GH/s in a compact space yet.

So BFL come on at least give us some estimated dimensions and db specs. :)


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: nedbert9 on March 26, 2012, 05:44:34 PM
Is there any information how the mini rig or the rig bix will look like? I am wondering what will be their phisical dimension, are they going to be expandable, etc.


I've seen the Mini Rig CAD mockup and the dense board placement makes my sphincter tense up.  Which sphincter?  All of them.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: DeathAndTaxes on March 26, 2012, 05:49:45 PM
I've seen the Mini Rig CAD mockup and the dense board placement makes my sphincter tense up.  Which sphincter?  All of them.

So share the images (the CAD ones not the sphincter ones).


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: BFL-Engineer on March 26, 2012, 06:23:37 PM
Is there any information how the mini rig or the rig bix will look like? I am wondering what will be their phisical dimension, are they going to be expandable, etc.

I wonder that myself.  I wonder how large it will need to be not because the FPGA take up a lot of space but due to the fact that 2.5KW is a lot of energy and the smaller the pkg the harder it is to cool.  

A visual excercise:
A 4x5970 rig is ~1KW.  Open framed it requires good amount of airflow to cool.   In a closed case, forget about it. :)  Now 1.25KW would be 20% more thermal load so image a hypothetical 5x5970 rig (pretend no 8 GPU limit). The "full rig box" (if it ends up getting built) would be double that.   To get an idea of the thermal energy vs volume visualize a 4U server chassis w/ 5x5970s inside now stack two of them on top of each other to simulate 2.5KW of power draw.  That is a pretty big box (8U = 14" by 19" by 24").  Could you cool that with air?
 How noisy would it be?  We already have a pretty large "rigbox".  Going larger would make it somewhat easier to cool.

Before I get flamed:
I am not saying the rigbox isn't more efficient.  It is.  The same sized box with the same amount of electricity/heat would produce 50 GH/s vs ~7 GH/s (10x 5970s). Still the laws of thermodynamics don't care what (or how much) the 2.5KW produced.  50GH/s on 2.5KW or 7GH/s on 2.5KW is still 2.5KW either way.  

That is an interesting challenge.  In mining the difficulty in cooling 1KW+ heat loads is what has lead to open frame rigs, extenders, extra high rpm fans, etc.  Will be interesting to see how they intend to cool them and how noisy they will be.  Not saying high potential noise is a problem (it isn't as most will be in datacenters or semi-industrial locations).  It just may shock some people who think of FPGA as silent and cool but that is just because nobody has scaled FPGA up to tens of GH/s in a compact space yet.

So BFL come on at least give us some estimated dimensions and db specs. :)

I wish I could give you some info, but at this point please let us have our final unit in front of us before
giving out details. Regarding the dB, it will be virtually silent when compared to GPUs... In fact, it is
engineered that way...


Good Luck,


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: DeathAndTaxes on March 26, 2012, 06:30:23 PM
I wish I could give you some info, but at this point please let us have our final unit in front of us before
giving out details. Regarding the dB, it will be virtually silent when compared to GPUs... In fact, it is
engineered that way...

Interesting.

Quote
Good Luck,

Why does BFL always wish me good luck?  Do they think I am in competition with them? :)


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: nedbert9 on March 26, 2012, 06:52:09 PM
I've seen the Mini Rig CAD mockup and the dense board placement makes my sphincter tense up.  Which sphincter?  All of them.

So share the images (the CAD ones not the sphincter ones).


Let's say, hypothetically, that I had this "friend."  Let's say this hypothetical friend had super powers much like a theoretical rainman-style, although mute, kid on a possibly terrible new Fox action-drama staring a one-style-fits-all actor, who coincidentally has a fellow actor father that possesses acting chops that far surpass his own with a last name of Sutherland.

So, hypothetically remember, this mute kid might leave an etch-a-sketch laying around with the words, "16 boards, vertical orientation, in a 10"x24" area."


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: jamesg on March 26, 2012, 06:55:04 PM
Let's say, hypothetically, that I had this "friend."  Let's say this hypothetical friend had super powers much like a theoretical rainman-style, although mute, kid on a possibly terrible new Fox action-drama staring a one-style-fits-all actor, who coincidentally has a fellow actor father that possesses acting chops that far surpass his own with a last name of Sutherland.

So, hypothetically remember, this mute kid might leave an etch-a-sketch laying around with the words, "16 boards, vertical orientation, in a 10"x24" area."

All that trouble to describe a diagram. I would like to give nedbert9 an award, but I'm still trying to figure out which one is most appropriate.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: rjk on March 26, 2012, 06:56:10 PM
Let's say, hypothetically, that I had this "friend."  Let's say this hypothetical friend had super powers much like a theoretical rainman-style, although mute, kid on a possibly terrible new Fox action-drama staring a one-style-fits-all actor, who coincidentally has a fellow actor father that possesses acting chops that far surpass his own with a last name of Sutherland.

So, hypothetically remember, this mute kid might leave an etch-a-sketch laying around with the words, "16 boards, vertical orientation, in a 10"x24" area."

All that trouble to describe a diagram. I would like to give nedbert9 an award, but I'm still trying to figure out which one is most appropriate.
The Golden Sphincter Award. You've earned it, nedbert9.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: wogaut on March 26, 2012, 07:07:19 PM
Let's say, hypothetically, that I had this "friend."  Let's say this hypothetical friend had super powers much like a theoretical rainman-style, although mute, kid on a possibly terrible new Fox action-drama staring a one-style-fits-all actor, who coincidentally has a fellow actor father that possesses acting chops that far surpass his own with a last name of Sutherland.

So, hypothetically remember, this mute kid might leave an etch-a-sketch laying around with the words, "16 boards, vertical orientation, in a 10"x24" area."

All that trouble to describe a diagram. I would like to give nedbert9 an award, but I'm still trying to figure out which one is most appropriate.
The Golden Sphincter Award. You've earned it, nedbert9.

Epic!

And here's the pic courtesy of Google:
http://d3j5vwomefv46c.cloudfront.net/photos/full/461193010.jpg?key=157360&Expires=1332789717&Key-Pair-Id=APKAIYVGSUJFNRFZBBTA&Signature=nnS02jNGZayfrIxgBTGlXJuip5mHukWlM-ffJqAFG0YcgdBwk8nqq4qN9UBMGGav2IcyAGTIt-TxmF09u~23sobcz-1ey4~xoVcmZM94zxxAgDeqkkr5rzfQiXf5jgCxxOFbTaCVbSIZgKs7NTw4nJ0MjCu9gLtugf8nWUdg3fg_ (http://d3j5vwomefv46c.cloudfront.net/photos/full/461193010.jpg?key=157360&Expires=1332789717&Key-Pair-Id=APKAIYVGSUJFNRFZBBTA&Signature=nnS02jNGZayfrIxgBTGlXJuip5mHukWlM-ffJqAFG0YcgdBwk8nqq4qN9UBMGGav2IcyAGTIt-TxmF09u~23sobcz-1ey4~xoVcmZM94zxxAgDeqkkr5rzfQiXf5jgCxxOFbTaCVbSIZgKs7NTw4nJ0MjCu9gLtugf8nWUdg3fg_)


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: triplehelix on March 26, 2012, 07:13:37 PM
Good Luck,

Why does BFL always wish me good luck?

[insert joke about bfl delivery here]


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: JWU42 on March 26, 2012, 07:25:05 PM
Let's say, hypothetically, that I had this "friend."  Let's say this hypothetical friend had super powers much like a theoretical rainman-style, although mute, kid on a possibly terrible new Fox action-drama staring a one-style-fits-all actor, who coincidentally has a fellow actor father that possesses acting chops that far surpass his own with a last name of Sutherland.

So, hypothetically remember, this mute kid might leave an etch-a-sketch laying around with the words, "16 boards, vertical orientation, in a 10"x24" area."

All that trouble to describe a diagram. I would like to give nedbert9 an award, but I'm still trying to figure out which one is most appropriate.
The Golden Sphincter Award. You've earned it, nedbert9.

Epic!

And here's the pic courtesy of Google:
http://d3j5vwomefv46c.cloudfront.net/photos/full/461193010.jpg?key=157360&Expires=1332789717&Key-Pair-Id=APKAIYVGSUJFNRFZBBTA&Signature=nnS02jNGZayfrIxgBTGlXJuip5mHukWlM-ffJqAFG0YcgdBwk8nqq4qN9UBMGGav2IcyAGTIt-TxmF09u~23sobcz-1ey4~xoVcmZM94zxxAgDeqkkr5rzfQiXf5jgCxxOFbTaCVbSIZgKs7NTw4nJ0MjCu9gLtugf8nWUdg3fg_ (http://d3j5vwomefv46c.cloudfront.net/photos/full/461193010.jpg?key=157360&Expires=1332789717&Key-Pair-Id=APKAIYVGSUJFNRFZBBTA&Signature=nnS02jNGZayfrIxgBTGlXJuip5mHukWlM-ffJqAFG0YcgdBwk8nqq4qN9UBMGGav2IcyAGTIt-TxmF09u~23sobcz-1ey4~xoVcmZM94zxxAgDeqkkr5rzfQiXf5jgCxxOFbTaCVbSIZgKs7NTw4nJ0MjCu9gLtugf8nWUdg3fg_)

http://www.angelamaiers.com/images/old/6a00e3981e8fb688330134863a8eb6970c-pi.jpg


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: nedbert9 on March 26, 2012, 07:29:45 PM
Let's say, hypothetically, that I had this "friend."  Let's say this hypothetical friend had super powers much like a theoretical rainman-style, although mute, kid on a possibly terrible new Fox action-drama staring a one-style-fits-all actor, who coincidentally has a fellow actor father that possesses acting chops that far surpass his own with a last name of Sutherland.

So, hypothetically remember, this mute kid might leave an etch-a-sketch laying around with the words, "16 boards, vertical orientation, in a 10"x24" area."

All that trouble to describe a diagram. I would like to give nedbert9 an award, but I'm still trying to figure out which one is most appropriate.

I'd prefer the Kids-that-should-not-follow-their-successful-parents-in-to-acting-except-for-the-Douglas'-and-Sheen's humanitarian award.

I'll take the STFU award, too.



Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: fulepp on March 27, 2012, 02:07:40 PM
One more question come to my mind.

Are these rigs will have a network connection or we have to connect it to a PC via USB?


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: JWU42 on March 27, 2012, 02:09:46 PM
For now I THINK they require a host PC - which could be something like Raspberry Pi  ;D


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: DeathAndTaxes on March 27, 2012, 02:11:57 PM
For now I THINK they require a host PC - which could be something like Raspberry Pi  ;D

Your likely right but it would be awesome to have a device with "internal host" and possibly a web interface for control and monitoring. :)


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: fulepp on March 27, 2012, 02:15:40 PM
For now I THINK they require a host PC - which could be something like Raspberry Pi  ;D

Your likely right but it would be awesome to have a device with "internal host" and possibly a web interface for control and monitoring. :)

+1


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: jamesg on March 27, 2012, 02:18:34 PM
For now I THINK they require a host PC - which could be something like Raspberry Pi  ;D

Your likely right but it would be awesome to have a device with "internal host" and possibly a web interface for control and monitoring. :)

+1

I do not see a need for this. Let's let BFL do what they are good at. Making FPGA chips hash like crazy.

Plugging in a rig box (or two mini rig boxes) to a host PC adds at most 100w draw.

You can use cgminer with BAMT or other monitoring tools to do this and they already exist. I can monitor all of my singles from the web, ssh, email and my phone. What more do you really need?


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: JWU42 on March 27, 2012, 02:31:31 PM
Well - time to order a few Raspberry Pi just incase  ;D


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Epoch on March 27, 2012, 03:02:02 PM
For now I THINK they require a host PC - which could be something like Raspberry Pi  ;D

Your likely right but it would be awesome to have a device with "internal host" and possibly a web interface for control and monitoring. :)

+1

I do not see a need for this. Let's let BFL do what they are good at. Making FPGA chips hash like crazy.

Plugging in a rig box (or two mini rig boxes) to a host PC adds at most 100w draw.

You can use cgminer with BAMT or other monitoring tools to do this and they already exist. I can monitor all of my singles from the web, ssh, email and my phone. What more do you really need?

I also do not see a need; an internal host is unnecessary and even undesirable. An external PC of your own choosing, running software of your own choice, controlling mining hardware you have chosen to buy, is preferable. There is value in 'choice', which is something most of us here understand well.

Also you do not need a 100W PC to control these miners (although if you have one kicking around anyway, might as well use it) ... a small, cheap, 20W Atom/Brazos nettop like an Eee Box EB1012/EB1021 is more than adequate.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: BlackPrapor on March 27, 2012, 03:10:27 PM
For now I THINK they require a host PC - which could be something like Raspberry Pi  ;D

Your likely right but it would be awesome to have a device with "internal host" and possibly a web interface for control and monitoring. :)
It'd be great to have an option of getting a box with those features.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: DeathAndTaxes on March 27, 2012, 03:10:33 PM
Yeah on second thought I agree with Giga & Epoch.  It seemed "cool" (plug in ethernet and power and it just starts hashing) but having an independent host means if host dies you don't need to RMA you $15K investment.  You also have more control over the OS, monitoring, miner software, etc.

Still I would imagine on a long enough timeline hashing will become essentially an commodity appliance that you never open, upgrade, or modify.   In time it will just be a rackmount box which you connect power and ethernet and then login to a webpage to set a couple configs and it just hashes away until it dies or becomes uneconomical.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: rjk on March 27, 2012, 03:28:34 PM
and it just hashes away until it dies
Those poor mining hardwares giving up their life and soul for our greedy gain  :'(


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: 1l1l11ll1l on March 29, 2012, 05:28:17 AM


The difference with BFL is that time risk isn't a matter of 'I WANT MY PONY!' - this isn't a puerile desire to have the latest cool kit before everyone else has. If BFL were the only players in the market for orders-of-magnitude-superior-to-GPUs mining kit, then everyone would be in the same boat (apart from those leet enough to design their own bitstreams and commission their own FPGA big-boxes). But they're not. And there's a time limit before the block reward halves, and we don't have an historical analogue of *this* event (re: money supply singularity) so we can't easily predict how the BTC economy will respond to it, whether by raising BTC/xxx FX rates or wiping out mining capacity.


While I definitely understand that the urgency is different, the products are shipping, which is definitely good.

One thing I understand completely, while not understanding at all, is why people are looking at the block reward halving as why you need to mine now. While yes, mining now gets more reward, mining later will get rewards, and the value of the coins will increase. It's a 2 edge sword, if everyone started getting their BFL orders in 3-4 days, you can sure bet the block halving would happen sooner, the first 10 rig boxes being delivered will immediately add 500GH, and that is very significant.

The most I can say is those who gambled with BFL and ordered blindly, won that gamble. Right now, BFL is the option for best price/performance in the FPGA world. I certainly hope to see some ASICs soon!


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: jamesg on March 29, 2012, 10:12:09 AM
The most I can say is those who gambled with BFL and ordered blindly, won that gamble.

I wouldn't call it "ordered blindly". Anyone could have picked up the phone and called them, ask for references, visited them or any number of other things to do some due diligence before making their purchase. I recommended this to multiple people in the old threads regarding BFL.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Cablez on March 29, 2012, 12:05:06 PM
gigavps,  did you actually call Sonny at the tail end of last year for info?  You seem to have been 'in the know' for quite a while. 

As for me, as soon as Inaba posted his stats that we could follow, I put in a order that night!! ;D


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: jamesg on March 29, 2012, 12:06:31 PM
gigavps,  did you actually call Sonny at the tail end of last year for info?  You seem to have been 'in the know' for quite a while.

Called and emailed. He is a very nice guy.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: BFL-Engineer on March 29, 2012, 12:43:20 PM

My point is, to wait 8 weeks for two rig boxes does not bother me in the least because I am not delusional enough to think that BFL should be perfect or that it's a cake walk to get more GPUs running.

If we had faith in their lead times this would all be moot...

Singles are taking 14-16 weeks now.  They are saying NOTHING publicly about what has happened and why we SHOULD believe their current claims on delivery.  As D&T said, they need a PR person in the worst way.

Rig Box is 12-15 weeks per Sonny (according to e-mail this week).  I fear it is closer to 20...  :(

EDIT - Sent e-mail to Sonny on this topic and asking for confirmation on mini-rig.  Might as well ask these questions directly...

Similar situation with wicked lasers. They released the arctic, people paid, and months went by without delivery. Eventually all were delivered and they're continuing to innovate and deliver great lasers. BFL never went into this saying "in stock ready to ship" they went in with calculated estimations, those estimations were definitely high, but the moment they figured that out, they announced it lowered the price, and made design adjustments to accommodate higher power requirements. Sonny has always been prompt to reply to my questions, my first order was delivered and I've already got my second order in.
OK I'll risk joining this discussion before it turns into a brawl... I was one of the northern Europe customers who ordered a Wicked Lasers Arctic when they announced them. Now Wicked Lasers are rather good at marketing, and the hype was great. The emails reached the right people, the right forums went viral, etc. and WL stood looking at a monstrous number of orders - a hell of a lot of them from the USA.

Of course, the original product was, IIRC, illegal in the USA for virtually any contrived reason. It looked like a light sabre toy but put out 1W of laser light - it was weapons grade and shipping with a nice set of goggles wasn't going to cut it. So a complete design respin was required to follow US weapons regs (which, for lasers, were being thought up on the fly). On top of that, the original production process (rip the diodes out of projectors and rebuild into fancy cases) wasn't scalable to the necessary level and the source of diodes wasn't enough.

Product didn't ship, customers got angry, WL themselves lost control of their own order management system (I received three Arctics for some reason - and yes, I offered to pay in full for all unexpected, unordered product). But product eventually shipped. I still have an Arctic and it works well. Product quality didn't disintegrate (at least in my tiny sample).

The difference with BFL is that time risk isn't a matter of 'I WANT MY PONY!' - this isn't a puerile desire to have the latest cool kit before everyone else has. If BFL were the only players in the market for orders-of-magnitude-superior-to-GPUs mining kit, then everyone would be in the same boat (apart from those leet enough to design their own bitstreams and commission their own FPGA big-boxes). But they're not. And there's a time limit before the block reward halves, and we don't have an historical analogue of *this* event (re: money supply singularity) so we can't easily predict how the BTC economy will respond to it, whether by raising BTC/xxx FX rates or wiping out mining capacity.

So most miners are looking to ensure their investments pay off *before* this event. And I'll admit I've got a dog in this fight, as I'm an FPGA miner too, but not in the USA so not a BFL customer. So call me biased, I don't mind. I like their 'plug and play' approach, but you can be sure that I'm hoping they take their time as *long* as possible to 'get the product right' ;) After all, if anyone with a few tens of thousands of dollars and a decent electrical supply can buy a box, plug it in and become a 'player' in the mining world, it removes the current technical barrier to entry, which is the only advantage people in high-power-cost locations (like both of mine) have right now. Mass mining centralisation to a few players with free power and unlimited capital is *not* good for the Bitcoin economy.


(and I would normally say, 'BFL - get an EU distributor for your products FFS', and then be polite and say 'please'... but it very much sounds like they're far too overstretched as it is to accept MORE customers and orders. This is a USA thing, and I desperately hope they don't revisit the Wicked Lasers scenario and get quagmired by US customs / export regs - after all, IIRC, the US is touchy about cryptographic equipment being exported without limitations and full disclosure... and will BFL tell the government *exactly* how it works if they're not telling us?)

Regarding the "EU Distributor", if the problem is the VAT, then opening an EU distributor
won't help since the VAT will definitely exist in that case. There may be a way or two to
get these units via post without incurring additional costs, however, with a distributor,
there won't be any.

Furthermore, an EU Distributor must pay social security charges, income taxes, professional
taxes, VAT (paid by the customer), land tax, business tax, probably CO2 tax... There is a whole
tax theme park behind it...


Good luck,


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Inaba on March 29, 2012, 01:56:43 PM
I very seriously doubt we are going to see the price go up much when the block reward halves.  There will be a slight increase leading up to it, then some wobbling after the change, then it will settle down again to whatever it was prior to the build up.  The "supply" isn't going to change the demand, since the demand is 99% speculation anyway.

So yes, you need to get to mining as much as you can and get back your ROI/break even prior to the block  reward halving, or you'll be doubling your ROI time when that happens.



Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: JWU42 on March 29, 2012, 02:12:40 PM
I tend to agree with Inaba- hence "time is of the essence" and would love to see this be more real world with penalty clauses etc. for >12 week delivery (stick).  Or on the other side, a bonus for each week less than 12 week delivery (carrot).

And yes, you can game it, but you get the gist of it...


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Epoch on March 29, 2012, 02:50:00 PM
I tend to agree with Inaba- hence "time is of the essence" and would love to see this be more real world with penalty clauses etc. for >12 week delivery (stick).  Or on the other side, a bonus for each week less than 12 week delivery (carrot).

And yes, you can game it, but you get the gist of it...

If 'time is of the essence' as you seem to suggest, you would be better off going down the street and buying up a whackload of GPUs (setting up a few mining rigs takes a week) rather than waiting 2, 3, 4 months for a BFL product. That 2,3,4 months of time can be earning you BTC, and the GPUs will break even sooner than a delayed Single or Rig/Mini if you start the clock now. Different story long-term, but if you are concerned with maximizing your profit before December then GPUs may be the best way of achieving that.

I have a different theory: when the reward is halved, I agree that it will have little impact on the BTC exchange rate. Most of that is buoyed by speculation, and speculators don't care (and/or are oblivious) about block reward or mining profitability. But miners are not; marginal miners (stealing DeathAndTaxes's terminology here) will become non-profitable and will stop mining. What we will see is not a BTC price increase, but rather a significant reduction in difficulty over the 2 or 3 months following the reward drop. Not a 50% reduction, but significant nonetheless. Marginal miners (those with inefficient GPU setups and/or high electricity costs) will be forced out, leaving the high-efficiency GPU miners and the FPGA crowd.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: BFL-Engineer on March 29, 2012, 03:01:24 PM
I tend to agree with Inaba- hence "time is of the essence" and would love to see this be more real world with penalty clauses etc. for >12 week delivery (stick).  Or on the other side, a bonus for each week less than 12 week delivery (carrot).

And yes, you can game it, but you get the gist of it...

If 'time is of the essence' as you seem to suggest, you would be better off going down the street and buying up a whackload of GPUs (setting up a few mining rigs takes a week) rather than waiting 2, 3, 4 months for a BFL product. That 2,3,4 months of time can be earning you BTC, and the GPUs will break even sooner than a delayed Single or Rig/Mini if you start the clock now. Different story long-term, but if you are concerned with maximizing your profit before December than GPUs may be the best way of achieving that.

I have a different theory: when the reward is halved, I agree that it will have little impact on the BTC exchange rate. Most of that is buoyed by speculation, and speculators don't care (and/or are oblivious) about block reward or mining profitability. But miners are not; marginal miners (stealing DeathAndTaxes's terminology here) will become non-profitable and will stop mining. What we will see is not a BTC price increase, but rather a significant reduction in difficulty over the 2 or 3 months following the reward drop. Not a 50% reduction, but significant nonetheless. Marginal miners (those with inefficient GPU setups and/or high electricity costs) will be forced out, leaving the high-efficiency GPU miners and the FPGA crowd.

I think the answer to this relies on one answer: How much of the Bitcoins traded daily in exchanges are fresh mined coins?
Anybody has any figures regarding this subject?


Regards,


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Inaba on March 29, 2012, 03:03:26 PM
Who says I haven't boosted my GPU holdings?  I have, actually... though I am running into space and power issues at this point... and more specifically, coming into summer, GPUs are less attractive since their cost to operate is going to increase dramatically with cooling requirements.  Over the winter, they helped quite a bit by heating the house - I have limited space in my DC, so only a portion of my rigs are there, the rest are in the basement.

Additionally, the absolutely nightmare/headache that keeping a large GPU farm running is also a huge turn off.  I am already required to put more time than I want into maintaining, RMAing, replacing, etc... parts to the GPU farm I have and increasing my GPU holdings would only increase the hassle there.  My sanity is worth a month or two waiting for some GPUs that won't (hopefully) give me any hassle vs trying to wring ever last dime out of GPUs before the block reward halving.  



Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: JWU42 on March 29, 2012, 03:11:17 PM
I tend to agree with Inaba- hence "time is of the essence" and would love to see this be more real world with penalty clauses etc. for >12 week delivery (stick).  Or on the other side, a bonus for each week less than 12 week delivery (carrot).

And yes, you can game it, but you get the gist of it...

If 'time is of the essence' as you seem to suggest, you would be better off going down the street and buying up a whackload of GPUs (setting up a few mining rigs takes a week) rather than waiting 2, 3, 4 months for a BFL product. That 2,3,4 months of time can be earning you BTC, and the GPUs will break even sooner than a delayed Single or Rig/Mini if you start the clock now. Different story long-term, but if you are concerned with maximizing your profit before December than GPUs may be the best way of achieving that.

I have a different theory: when the reward is halved, I agree that it will have little impact on the BTC exchange rate. Most of that is buoyed by speculation, and speculators don't care (and/or are oblivious) about block reward or mining profitability. But miners are not; marginal miners (stealing DeathAndTaxes's terminology here) will become non-profitable and will stop mining. What we will see is not a BTC price increase, but rather a significant reduction in difficulty over the 2 or 3 months following the reward drop. Not a 50% reduction, but significant nonetheless. Marginal miners (those with inefficient GPU setups and/or high electricity costs) will be forced out, leaving the high-efficiency GPU miners and the FPGA crowd.

Thermal envelope has been reached and I do not have the time or energy to deal with offsite locations...

@Epoch - it is a very fair point you make however...

EDIT - I ahve increased my GPU operations 200% in the last 6 weeks  ;)


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: nedbert9 on March 29, 2012, 06:40:06 PM
I tend to agree with Inaba- hence "time is of the essence" and would love to see this be more real world with penalty clauses etc. for >12 week delivery (stick).  Or on the other side, a bonus for each week less than 12 week delivery (carrot).

And yes, you can game it, but you get the gist of it...

If 'time is of the essence' as you seem to suggest, you would be better off going down the street and buying up a whackload of GPUs (setting up a few mining rigs takes a week) rather than waiting 2, 3, 4 months for a BFL product. That 2,3,4 months of time can be earning you BTC, and the GPUs will break even sooner than a delayed Single or Rig/Mini if you start the clock now. Different story long-term, but if you are concerned with maximizing your profit before December then GPUs may be the best way of achieving that.

I have a different theory: when the reward is halved, I agree that it will have little impact on the BTC exchange rate. Most of that is buoyed by speculation, and speculators don't care (and/or are oblivious) about block reward or mining profitability. But miners are not; marginal miners (stealing DeathAndTaxes's terminology here) will become non-profitable and will stop mining. What we will see is not a BTC price increase, but rather a significant reduction in difficulty over the 2 or 3 months following the reward drop. Not a 50% reduction, but significant nonetheless. Marginal miners (those with inefficient GPU setups and/or high electricity costs) will be forced out, leaving the high-efficiency GPU miners and the FPGA crowd.


Need to check the math on that.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: JWU42 on March 29, 2012, 07:11:36 PM
OK - I'll bite...

5970 - $400 (trying to skew to BFL's favor with a price on the HIGH side)
 - Conservatively running 700 Mh/s
 - .43 BTC/day
 - $2.16 (using $5 FX as a round number)
 - Could be mining by April 2, 2012
 - 185 day (26 weeks) payback (keeping it simple and ignoring power costs)

BFL Single
 - 832 Mh/s
 - .51 BTC/day
 - $2.57 (again, using $5)
 - Delivery in 6 weeks (BEYOND optimistic) - Start Mining May 14, 2012
 - 233 day (33 week) payback

So by early October the 5970 is paid off and the single, with the 6 week additional leadtime (realistically like 12), wouldn't be paid off in 2012...

If you net out power costs assuming $.12 Kwh.  5970 at 250 W (memory downclocked) and BFL Single at 80 W.

For the 5970, $2.16 a day is reduced by $.72 to net out $1.44 profit. 277 day payback (40 weeks) - so paid off by Week 2 of 2013
For the BFL single, $2.57 a day is reduced by $.23 to net out $2.34 profit.  256 day payback (36 weeks) - so paid off in week 4 in 2013.

So maybe nedbert9 is more correct than originally assumed.  Especially if power costs are high.

But there are three points which skew this closer than it should be...

1.  $400 purchase price of 5970
2.  Ignored the rapacious shipping on the BFL
3.  Took the BFL leadtime to 6 weeks


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Epoch on March 29, 2012, 07:35:15 PM
OK - I'll bite...
...
So by early October the 5970 is paid off and the single, with the 6 week additional leadtime (realistically like 12), wouldn't be paid off in 2012...

If you net out power costs assuming $.12 Kwh...

For the 5970, $2.16 a day is reduced by $.72 to net out $1.44 profit. 277 day payback (40 weeks) - so paid off by Week 2 of 2013
For the BFL single, $2.57 a day is reduced by $.23 to net out $2.34 profit.  256 day payback (36 weeks) - so paid off in week 4 in 2013.
...

Nice start. Yes, the calculation is highly sensitive to the local price of electricity. Many of the large miners are paying closer to $0.06 to $0.08 per kWh; $0.12 is uncommonly high for North America. The current BFL Single leadtime is 12 weeks (no January order has yet shipped) so July 1 would be a more realistic 'start mining with a Single ordered today' date. Under these conditions the GPU has an even larger lead for break-even.

The other aspect is that the salvage/resale value of those 2 items. The 5970 should retain more of its original purchase price than the Single.

Back on topic ... @BFL-Engineer: if you are ready, can you post some official information on the Mini-Rig on your website? Forum speculation is nice but pointless after some time; if this is a real product offering we'd appreciate some official BFL information/announcement.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: JWU42 on March 29, 2012, 07:55:22 PM
http://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/excel/epmxlfile5_6_a.xls

This appears to be net of taxes so rates are slightly understated.  US Residential Jan 2012 average is $.1143


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Epoch on March 29, 2012, 08:25:58 PM
http://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/excel/epmxlfile5_6_a.xls

This appears to be net of taxes so rates are slightly understated.  US Residential Jan 2012 average is $.1143
Keep in mind that the large-scale (read: efficient) miners would have set up shop where rates are more favorable than that. And many of them would not be paying residential rates; commercial rates in industrial parks/datacenters (even if not using 240V) are more attractive.

I'm a small-scale miner; I have an inefficient setup of a few dual-GPU rigs but my electricity costs are low. If I had to pay $0.12/kWh I don't think I'd be mining today. Not with GPUs, anyway, at least not unless I put in the effort to increase my mining efficiency.

For those with high electricity costs, I think they are a good market target for BFL (for any FPGA vendor): the higher your electricity costs, the more you stand to gain from FPGAs. But that is not to say that GPU mining is going away any time soon.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: BFL on March 29, 2012, 11:04:27 PM
Epoch,  there will be an official announcement regarding the Mini-Rig next week.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: guruvan on March 30, 2012, 03:59:06 AM
Epoch,  there will be an official announcement regarding the Mini-Rig next week.

This is great news. Thank you guys for the update.

(We will hope the announcement includes rackmounting options) :D


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: abeaulieu on March 30, 2012, 12:28:51 PM
Epoch,  there will be an official announcement regarding the Mini-Rig next week.

I can't comprehend how BFL has the time and resources to research, design, and launch another product when there are massive amounts of BFL Single orders that have yet to be fulfilled from several months ago. I would think the priority of the company would be to get those products in the hands of the customers that were guaranteed the product in 4-6 weeks that have spent more than 12 weeks waiting.

I know it may not mean too much to you, but this places serious doubt in the efficacy of the company. That being said I am a BFL supporter, in that I have placed a BFL Single order and I will wait patiently for what seems to be a very impactful product.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: bombo999 on March 30, 2012, 05:37:03 PM
singles are delayed due to Chinese new year ... the holiday has been extended by 6 months this year :)


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: dust on April 01, 2012, 08:27:37 PM
I am interested, but will be much more likely to purchase if the warranty is 1year+.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: JWU42 on April 01, 2012, 08:28:41 PM
Ain't gonna happen - we would all like longer warranty...  :D


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: gnar1ta$ on April 04, 2012, 03:23:17 AM
Epoch,  there will be an official announcement regarding the Mini-Rig next week.

Are your announcement 'weeks' the same as your shipping 'weeks'?


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: kjlimo on April 04, 2012, 09:17:50 AM
Epoch,  there will be an official announcement regarding the Mini-Rig next week.

Are your announcement 'weeks' the same as your shipping 'weeks'?

 :D


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: jamesg on April 04, 2012, 09:55:39 AM
Epoch,  there will be an official announcement regarding the Mini-Rig next week.

Are your announcement 'weeks' the same as your shipping 'weeks'?

You guys are like wounded elephants.

If you are serious about getting some BFL products, get your wallets out and call BFL. Their phone number is right on their site.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: tgmarks on April 04, 2012, 02:14:17 PM
Epoch,  there will be an official announcement regarding the Mini-Rig next week.

Are your announcement 'weeks' the same as your shipping 'weeks'?

You guys are like wounded elephants.

If you are serious about getting some BFL products, get your wallets out and call BFL. Their phone number is right on their site.
putting your money where your mouth is, is an agreeable statement, but what do wounded elephants have to do with anything?


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: jamesg on April 04, 2012, 02:23:29 PM
Epoch,  there will be an official announcement regarding the Mini-Rig next week.

Are your announcement 'weeks' the same as your shipping 'weeks'?

You guys are like wounded elephants.

If you are serious about getting some BFL products, get your wallets out and call BFL. Their phone number is right on their site.
putting your money where your mouth is, is an agreeable statement, but what do wounded elephants have to do with anything?

Elephants never forget.

I keep seeing the same dribble posted on these threads because people just think doing business any other way beside being perfect is unacceptable.

Instead of reminding everyone what we already know, I am only suggesting to pick up the phone and do your own research.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: gnar1ta$ on April 04, 2012, 03:36:15 PM
Epoch,  there will be an official announcement regarding the Mini-Rig next week.

Are your announcement 'weeks' the same as your shipping 'weeks'?

You guys are like wounded elephants.

If you are serious about getting some BFL products, get your wallets out and call BFL. Their phone number is right on their site.
putting your money where your mouth is, is an agreeable statement, but what do wounded elephants have to do with anything?

Elephants never forget.

I keep seeing the same dribble posted on these threads because people just think doing business any other way beside being perfect is unacceptable.

Instead of reminding everyone what we already know, I am only suggesting to pick up the phone and do your own research.

For the record, I haven't dribbled in any BFL threads.  Just don't have $30K to give them, but like the $15K rig idea that isn't on their website or announced here yet.  But if all it takes is a phone call that's easy enough.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: kjlimo on April 04, 2012, 03:40:32 PM
Epoch,  there will be an official announcement regarding the Mini-Rig next week.

Are your announcement 'weeks' the same as your shipping 'weeks'?

You guys are like wounded elephants.

If you are serious about getting some BFL products, get your wallets out and call BFL. Their phone number is right on their site.

Never called anyone with my wallet... sorry for trolling :D


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: DeathAndTaxes on April 04, 2012, 03:41:38 PM
http://lh4.ggpht.com/-W99HPO0WJps/Rmt0XLWUi-I/AAAAAAAAClk/ssRVU618ZqE/IMG_1510.jpg


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: kjlimo on April 04, 2012, 03:43:20 PM

Gotta get me one of those!


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: tgmarks on April 05, 2012, 07:29:28 PM
Called up BFL yesterday to ask about the mini-rig. They said it will be priced at $15,400. It will be a somewhat modular design like the rig box, but they wont sell a 'bare bones model'. It will be fairly loaded as sold at the 25gh setup.

I was hoping for a cheaper, less loaded version with the ability to build it up as funds are available.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: JWU42 on April 05, 2012, 07:43:50 PM
This is consistent with what I was told as well via e-mail a week ago -- FWIW


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Epoch on April 07, 2012, 03:40:10 AM
The Mini Rig is now on BFL's product page; the Rig Box is gone.

http://www.butterflylabs.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/iso-desktop-server.Color-Output1.png


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: tgmarks on April 07, 2012, 05:48:47 AM
So what are the square blocks with the circle cut out over each board?  Is that going to be an additional fan over each?


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: dropt on April 07, 2012, 08:05:53 AM
So what are the square blocks with the circle cut out over each board?  Is that going to be an additional fan over each?

That's my assumption.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: JWU42 on April 07, 2012, 10:48:30 AM
Glad they finally decided...


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: abeaulieu on April 07, 2012, 05:36:55 PM
The Mini Rig is now on BFL's product page; the Rig Box is gone.

The air flow kind of scares me with this setup. Could definitely be optimized, especially if those are fans over each board.

I see what looks like 24 singles. By my calculations that is just shy of 20GH/s. I wonder if they're planning on optimizing the Single firmware or designing new modules that gets a little over 1GH/s.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Inspector 2211 on April 07, 2012, 05:42:15 PM
The Mini Rig is now on BFL's product page; the Rig Box is gone.

The air flow kind of scares me with this setup. Could definitely be optimized, especially if those are fans over each board.

I see what looks like 24 singles. By my calculations that is just shy of 20GH/s. I wonder if they're planning on optimizing the Single firmware or designing new modules that gets a little over 1GH/s.

Only 18 modules, because the power supply takes up some space.
Total hash performance 25 GH/s.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: wogaut on April 07, 2012, 05:44:59 PM
So if the Mini-Rig consists of 24 boards like in this drawing, each one has about 1GH/s and about 20MH/W, just like at some point proposed for the Singles.

Why don't the Singles?

Obviously a new board. When will we see Singles with it?

Edit: Inspector2211 asked the question, sorry for the redundancy


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Inspector 2211 on April 07, 2012, 06:24:31 PM
So if the Mini-Rig consists of 24 boards like in this drawing, each one has about 1GH/s and about 20MH/W, just like at some point proposed for the Singles.

It doesn't. It consists of 18 modules, because the power supply takes up some space. Total hash rate is 25 GH/s.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: aTg on April 07, 2012, 07:55:27 PM
Moderators are not it a little spam three threads to discuss the same topic?
http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/538/spamlg.jpg


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: wogaut on April 07, 2012, 08:01:20 PM
Moderators are not it a little spam three threads to discuss the same topic?

Your grammar doesn't make sense.

Re spam, what about all the threads discussing various aspects of Icarus?
Searching the boards, there are several of those too in addition to the main thread.

Granted, I too find it a bit annoying that I now have to read and watch several BFL threads but that hardly qualifies them as spam.




Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: K.A.T on April 10, 2012, 07:24:35 AM

 Due to the cost, I would join 3-5 people in a group purchase and share the costs and share the mining profit.

Regards,,,


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Miner612 on April 10, 2012, 07:23:56 PM
Moderators are not it a little spam three threads to discuss the same topic?
http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/538/spamlg.jpg

Great job Forum Police.  smh

freaking douche nerd.  You don't let ANYTHING slide I bet huh?  lmfaooooo


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: rjk on April 10, 2012, 08:14:24 PM
Code:
Quote from: aTg on April 07, 2012, 03:55:27 PM

rabble rabble
Congratulations! You are only 3 days late to the party!


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: psahx on April 15, 2012, 09:33:05 PM
Greetings!

Please welcome me and let me watch what happens with BFL's shipping times.

Thanks


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: ChiangYay on April 16, 2012, 06:40:22 AM
I think the Rig Box never existed and the same for the Mini.
Only pictures. 

They don't give any indication about the delivery terms for the Mini.
Probably they have issues cooling it, for that they are working on water blocks.
I guess it will be available next year with water blocks at an higher price and I will happy to order two.

Does anyone have ordered a Rig or Mini Box?
Do you get any indication about the delivery date?

Anyway I believe they are good guys and are doing a great job with limited financial resources.

So I don't blame them for delaying the delivery to use that money for R&D.
 


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: jamesg on April 16, 2012, 10:26:03 AM
I think the Rig Box never existed and the same for the Mini.
Only pictures. 

They don't give any indication about the delivery terms for the Mini.
Probably they have issues cooling it, for that they are working on water blocks.
I guess it will be available next year with water blocks at an higher price and I will happy to order two.

Does anyone have ordered a Rig or Mini Box?
Do you get any indication about the delivery date?

Anyway I believe they are good guys and are doing a great job with limited financial resources.

So I don't blame them for delaying the delivery to use that money for R&D.

I have ordered 4 mini rig boxes. They should be here sometime in May.

If you want more information, call Butterfly Labs. Their phone number is on their website.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: ChiangYay on April 17, 2012, 08:45:17 AM
I called they said the delivery will be after 12 or 15  weeks after receiving the payment.
That means about 4 months may be more since there are people waiting the single since January.
So how it's possible that you will get it next month?
Also the Mini Box was announced in April 7.
So I think may be you will get in July or August if you are lucky.

Anyway I'm happy for you if you will have next month.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: jamesg on April 17, 2012, 09:23:56 AM
So how it's possible that you will get it next month?

I ordered 2 rig boxes two months ago. 2 rig boxes turned into 4 mini rig boxes.

Mystery solved.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: psahx on April 17, 2012, 09:24:09 AM
So how it's possible that you will get it next month?
Also the Mini Box was announced in April 7.

Obviously he had ordered Rig boxes before the Mini Rig announcement on April 7, thus he will get 4 Mini Rigs soon enough, to make us envy for about 12-15 weeks  ;D


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: WhitePhantom on April 19, 2012, 09:00:19 PM
So how it's possible that you will get it next month?

I ordered 2 rig boxes two months ago. 2 rig boxes turned into 4 mini rig boxes.

Mystery solved.

Similar to gigavps, I ordered one rig box, now two mini-rigs, a little over a month ago.  The last time I asked, Sonny said it should ship end of June.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: jddebug on April 20, 2012, 01:01:33 AM
I have been told middle to end of June for mine.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Garr255 on June 09, 2012, 09:51:17 PM
What if BFL is just going to say:

"Mini-Rig customers will be receiving ASIC Mini-Rigs!!!!"

The timing seems very right, assuming their announcement is not just getting us excited for a product that we can't order for three months, which would be a very bad move on their part.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Pipesnake on June 09, 2012, 10:25:11 PM
Rabble rabble rabble


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Inaba on June 10, 2012, 02:13:46 AM
No, the rigs shipping soon are definitely FPGA based, not ASIC.  They have a bunch of FPGA boards all ready to go... though the mini-rig assembly looks like a herculean job.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Garr255 on June 10, 2012, 03:08:33 AM
though the mini-rig assembly looks like a herculean job.

I'm available for the summer ;)


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: BlackPrapor on June 10, 2012, 04:38:33 AM
Check this out guys. ::)
http://img839.imageshack.us/img839/9408/mrbuild1.th.jpg (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/839/mrbuild1.jpg/)


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: rjk on June 10, 2012, 04:45:24 AM
Check this out guys. ::)
http://img839.imageshack.us/img839/9408/mrbuild1.th.jpg (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/839/mrbuild1.jpg/)
Wow, it's massive. Wonder how big the "rig box" would have been lol.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: crazyates on June 10, 2012, 04:54:58 AM
Check this out guys. ::)
http://img839.imageshack.us/img839/9408/mrbuild1.th.jpg (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/839/mrbuild1.jpg/)
Wow, it's massive. Wonder how big the "rig box" would have been lol.

Massive? I dare you to build a smaller 25GH farm.

Nice pic, btw!


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: jddebug on June 10, 2012, 05:20:30 AM
Check this out guys. ::)
http://img839.imageshack.us/img839/9408/mrbuild1.th.jpg (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/839/mrbuild1.jpg/)

Beautiful. Good job. What did you use as the enclosure?


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: BlackPrapor on June 10, 2012, 05:23:05 AM
And this one
 http://img109.imageshack.us/img109/5901/mrbuild.th.jpg (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/109/mrbuild.jpg/)


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: BlackPrapor on June 10, 2012, 05:25:40 AM
Beautiful. Good job. What did you use as the enclosure?
its a mini-rig box, got these pics today from BFL. I guess they're going to ship first ones very soon. Mine are due in July


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: jddebug on June 10, 2012, 05:35:23 AM
Beautiful. Good job. What did you use as the enclosure?
its a mini-rig box, got these pics today from BFL. I guess they're going to ship first ones very soon. Mine are due in July


hehe, my mistake. I thought you had built it for a bunch of singles.

So, What are the dimensions of that I wonder?


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: BlackPrapor on June 10, 2012, 05:46:37 AM
Beautiful. Good job. What did you use as the enclosure?
its a mini-rig box, got these pics today from BFL. I guess they're going to ship first ones very soon. Mine are due in July


hehe, my mistake. I thought you had built it for a bunch of singles.

So, What are the dimensions of that I wonder?


You can easily canculate dimensions based on the size of fans used. There're 80mm in horizontal setup, and 120mm in vertical - on the sides.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: P_Shep on June 10, 2012, 05:46:44 AM
So just the 42 fans then?


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: crazyates on June 10, 2012, 05:55:12 AM
So just the 42 fans then?

I count 35.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Garr255 on June 10, 2012, 06:06:18 AM
So just the 42 fans then?

I count 35.

There are 42 :P


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Dexter770221 on June 10, 2012, 06:13:40 AM
Vacuum cleaner, YEAH!!!
Without air filter this will be masacre after 1 month of usage....


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: dropt on June 10, 2012, 07:21:16 AM

17 modules @ 1 each, 2 sides @ 9 each.... 17+(2*9) looks a lot like 35 to me too.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Inspector 2211 on June 10, 2012, 07:37:27 AM
The answer to life, the universe, and everything?    :o


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: P_Shep on June 10, 2012, 07:44:46 AM
So just the 42 fans then?

I count 35.

You can't count :)

9 on each side = 18

4 layers of 6 = 24

18 + 24 = 42


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: BlackPrapor on June 10, 2012, 07:45:17 AM

17 modules @ 1 each, 2 sides @ 9 each.... 17+(2*9) looks a lot like 35 to me too.
+1 inside PSU, which makes it 36. Aircon with a dust filter is a must have I think.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: BlackPrapor on June 10, 2012, 07:48:05 AM
Would be cool to have it all water cooled. Less space between the modules, and some room for a radiator on top. Less fans = less noise.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Turbor on June 10, 2012, 10:19:32 AM
Looks like a great product to me. The only thing I dislike is the build quality :-\ hate this scratches on a 15k machine. Use some tape for protection ! I hope they're going to repaint the chassis before delivery. :'(


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: mrb on June 10, 2012, 10:59:01 AM
Looks like a great product to me. The only thing I dislike is the build quality :-\ hate this scratches on a 15k machine. Use some tape for protection ! I hope they're going to repaint the chassis before delivery. :'(

I heard painting strips make the mini rigs faster.

Seriously, I don't think any miner dedicated enough to spend $15k on mining hw cares about scratches on cases caused by manual assembly. Especially when there are many more legitimate concerns to have (underestimated delivery times, suboptimal cooling design, etc).


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Turbor on June 10, 2012, 11:19:59 AM
I heard painting strips make the mini rigs faster.

Seriously, I don't think any miner dedicated enough to spend $15k on mining hw cares about scratches on cases caused by manual assembly. Especially when there are many more legitimate concerns to have (underestimated delivery times, suboptimal cooling design, etc).

Sadly all this shit fits together...


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: rjk on June 10, 2012, 11:42:12 AM
Now that I see the cooling design, it makes a lot more sense to me and I think it will work better than I expected.

For those that haven't quite figured it out how it works, it seems that the fan intakes (or maybe the exhaust? Not sure which way they blow...) are set up against a metal(?) plate with holes in it, and not just spinning freely in space. That plate acts as a duct from one side to the other, allowing for cool intake air evenly across all modules, not just the ones on the side of the intake fans.

As for the exhaust, well it isn't quite as pretty of a picture as far as I can tell, but it certainly should be much less of a problem with all the fans.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Cablez on June 10, 2012, 12:53:03 PM
I want to see a picture of the PSU side!!!  (just want to see what PSU they chose for this beast) ;D


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Inaba on June 10, 2012, 01:22:08 PM
Rjk is basically correct.  The fans will exhaust from left to right (as you're looking at the front of the case.)

The PSU is a Thermaltake 1400w.

The case is anodized, so painting is not going to work very well.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Cablez on June 10, 2012, 01:29:45 PM
You would be surprised how well a sharpie works in those kind of situations. ;)


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: Inspector 2211 on June 10, 2012, 03:13:50 PM
I would like to know the WEIGHT of the mini rig.
My mining office is on the 2nd floor of a 2-story office building - there is no elevator.   :'(


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: ice_chill on June 10, 2012, 03:26:14 PM
I would like to know the WEIGHT of the mini rig.
My mining office is on the 2nd floor of a 2-story office building - there is no elevator.   :'(

Do you also have no friends ?  :D


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: mrb on June 10, 2012, 03:46:10 PM
I would like to know the WEIGHT of the mini rig.
My mining office is on the 2nd floor of a 2-story office building - there is no elevator.   :'(

- BFL said a mini rig card mines at 1.5Gh/s, therefore it will have 17 cards for 25Gh/s total (even though mini rig prototype pictures show it may have more cards, they don't show all angles).
- Each card should weight at most 1kg (heatsinks...) -- this is an overestimation, for reference an HD 6990 weights 1.16kg.
- The 1400W ATX PSU will weight about 2-3kg.
- The case and fans will weight about 10-15kg.

Therefore I estimate a mini rig will weight 30kg +/- 5kg, still kind of transportable by an adult in average shape https://i.imgur.com/nzase.gif


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: ice_chill on June 10, 2012, 04:23:03 PM
I would like to know the WEIGHT of the mini rig.
My mining office is on the 2nd floor of a 2-story office building - there is no elevator.   :'(

- BFL said a mini rig card mines at 1.5Gh/s, therefore it will have 17 cards for 25Gh/s total (even though mini rig prototype pictures show it may have more cards, they don't show all angles).
- Each card should weight at most 1kg (heatsinks...) -- this is an overestimation, for reference an HD 6990 weights 1.16kg.
- The 1400W ATX PSU will weight about 2-3kg.
- The case and fans will weight about 10-15kg.

Therefore I estimate a mini rig will weight 30kg +/- 5kg, still kind of transportable by an adult in average shape https://i.imgur.com/nzase.gif

At 30kg how will it survive if dropped ? it's better they send the kit and we assemble.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: rjk on June 10, 2012, 04:32:27 PM
I don't know whether it will have handles on top, but from the pictures it seems to have four vertical posts of threaded rod that appear to run all the way down to the base of the rig that could possibly be structural or used to carry it. If they screwed into a plate in the base, the plate could support the rest of the rig when picked up by those.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: BlackPrapor on June 10, 2012, 05:08:31 PM
I would like to know the WEIGHT of the mini rig.
My mining office is on the 2nd floor of a 2-story office building - there is no elevator.   :'(
I remember a quote from Sonny about single's weight. It's around 0,5kg. Since they're essentially same in config and I'll assume rig case gives similar weight per card, as in singles, excluding PSU, so that's 8,5kg+2,5=11kg in total. I really hope they're using aluminum for plates as well.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: sadpandatech on June 10, 2012, 07:30:58 PM
I would like to know the WEIGHT of the mini rig.
My mining office is on the 2nd floor of a 2-story office building - there is no elevator.   :'(

Do you also have no friends ?  :D

Maybe just not any friends he trusts to help lug 15 grand worth of gear up some stairs. Or to know where it is located for that matter. ;p


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: dropt on June 10, 2012, 08:04:01 PM

You can't count :)

9 on each side = 18

4 layers of 6 = 24

18 + 24 = 42

Or you're counting things you can't see (that don't exist); there aren't 24 cards.  In fact, BlackPrapor is actually the winner because he's including the PSU fan. 


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: bitfury on June 10, 2012, 10:06:20 PM
And this one
 http://img109.imageshack.us/img109/5901/mrbuild.th.jpg (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/109/mrbuild.jpg/)

Does this butter fly ? (device is nice and big hamburger :-)

I mean power consumption measured on input with fans running, performance, etc....
As these fans seems to be hungry fans...


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: ice_chill on June 10, 2012, 11:03:52 PM
And this one
 http://img109.imageshack.us/img109/5901/mrbuild.th.jpg (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/109/mrbuild.jpg/)

Does this butter fly ? (device is nice and big hamburger :-)

I mean power consumption measured on input with fans running, performance, etc....
As these fans seems to be hungry fans...


Wow where did you get this photo ? :)


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: rjk on June 11, 2012, 12:16:04 AM
Ask and ye shall receive, sometimes.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: BlackPrapor on June 11, 2012, 03:31:03 AM
As these fans seems to be hungry fans...
I think someone already quoted power usage on 80mm fans, its around ~1.4w, but could be 2w (depends on the model). If they use silent fans, then it should be 1.4w. So, roughly they eat 49W for an average 17 cards system.


Title: Re: Mini-Rig from Butterflylabs
Post by: mrb on June 16, 2012, 08:26:12 AM
- BFL said a mini rig card mines at 1.5Gh/s, therefore it will have 17 cards for 25Gh/s total (even though mini rig prototype pictures show it may have more cards, they don't show all angles).
- Each card should weight at most 1kg (heatsinks...) -- this is an overestimation, for reference an HD 6990 weights 1.16kg.
- The 1400W ATX PSU will weight about 2-3kg.
- The case and fans will weight about 10-15kg.

Therefore I estimate a mini rig will weight 30kg +/- 5kg, still kind of transportable by an adult in average shape https://i.imgur.com/nzase.gif

BFL said the mini rig weights a little under 23kg (50lb). I was close :)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=75764.msg966604#msg966604