sent coins in for the 4000:1 over a month ago and still no replies from support threw email.   I advised support i had to send in chucks due to large amount of holding and couldn't be sent as 1 TXId as wallet would not allow that many coins sent as once.. This really piss's me of due i was 1 of the 1st miners of the original pac and never dumped it at any time and helped with links that were missing on sites you was listed on and devs didnt clearly provide that info. i helped u grow and helped u hash to move chain along but this the thanks long term holder and helper of you coin gets. I have proof of mining txid's and proof of txid's sent to support for the 4000:1 swap. As a long term holder of old pac i consider this to be theft as i was a major holder of pac and there just trying to cut me out of it. The 1000:1 swap was meant to go for a year but cut it short without major notice on any exchange or anywere realy ( many qqed about this ), i took it on the chin and sent the coins for the 4000:1 swap but then no reply or coins sent... Believe me this wont work out that you screw old guard traders and miners over, all you will end up with is china farm miners that dump the shit and dont really give to hoots about your coins or support in any way bar selling till 1 sat. Stabycroc ;_)> I found your first message, it was in August. But the ransom ended in June. The completion of the ransom was reported on all channels, about a month before the end. In any case, there are no guys who deceived you. John Cordos(Smoker), Eric Hayes(Expos)or swolf this, Vince Cordos(Stoic) long ago left the project, Robbing it and its investors. You can read in this section how the user Klementine exposed them, but then he disappeared, maybe he was paid for silence. Now is led by completely another dev Team. The project did rebranding, and Fork. You can either stay on the old $PAC network or switch to the new PACGlobal chain. But those people who led the $PAC deceived not only you, they deceived all investors. The new team should create their own channel on Bitcointalk. But for some reason they have not done it yet. Nope and Nope they changed the swap dates like 3x... i was in email contact with devs before then and during... your clearly part of there hype team and just a scammer urself.. ur a nobody in crypto trying to tell old gaurd with crypto trust and respect in all walks of crypto .. basically no REAL crypto trader or reader TRUST wtf u say....esp if u dont know whom the F mr.floppy and fairlady is lol Go bac to ur main account "Coookie" and talk ur total crap there like u used to do. "ransom" is that wat u scammers call a Fake crypto coin swap these days is it?!?! These devs u talk of stole my swap and if u knew anything u would know they didn change the swap dates and % for swap 3x... but alot of that info was removed and hard to show unless u was actualy there at the time ( it said on there site the dates and then changed 3x... Ive tried to work it out in background since start of issues and lies to get my coins ive held since mining PAc on ispace ( my txids and proof of ownership of coins go back YEARS!! if u cant understand the issues with LONG term holders getting stolen from for people that only held for months if not days get there coin but long term hold dont ur got more issues. ) Just like POS/POW... POO ( proof of ownership ) doesnt matter to shiity scammie devs new or old... If the coin was swaped clean there wouldnt be issues and me here. I also blame this forum for not making rules for ALL devs when the devs want to swap coins.... basically no1 rule for any crypto coin swap... All coins from old chain MUST be held at same amount or swap value amount (100:1 1:1 2:1 ect ect ) tilll old holders claim.. Only way coins cant be swapped is if they been stolen or dev funds. alot of Great devs do it this way anyways and just proves that other dev that dont out to steal and control more coin.. I have never seen so much nonsense in a single post. Thank you for making it so obvious who you are - nothing what I could have said or written would make it clearer for the reader than this. The things I laughed about the most: 1. Blaming this forum - this is probably the most ridiculous claim you have made so far. 2. Santibanes is Russian (if I remember this correctly) and I am certainly not. The word "ransom" is most likely the Google Translator error.... just check how hard he was against certain members of the old, $PAC team (before the PAC Global team forked away from $PAC). |
|
|
|
Plagiarism. The most frequently observed form of academic dishonesty is plagiarism. Plagiarism is the adoption or incorporation of another's ideas without proper attribution of the source. It is more simply defined as taking the writings of another person or people and representing them to be one's own.ps: I have noticed, this bitcointalk forum have been removed from all website relating to PAC (CMC, Coingeko, etc...) ASHAMED of yourself COOKIESS???  Of course I am not. I am not bashing, insulting or accusing anyone like some do. It got removed, since one needs the original poster to change the first post of a bitcointalk thread - one simply cannot update the information on it without him/her. One does not want to have links pointing to information pertaining to the previous generation of PAC. As for the plagiarism: I told you already above, that none is claiming that the sentence is "one's own". "Nice work" on noticing that half of one sentence "plagiarism", as you call it. |
|
|
|
What a shame for PAC! Lying, stealing and dishonesty... what else?
Repeating the same things all over again, without anything to back it up, does not make it true. Just about every "argument" or "evidence" you provided has been essentially wrong. |
|
|
|
Really professional! That's called plagiarism! Shame on you... That's again a proof of your so called professional team.
"Plagiarism is the "wrongful appropriation" and "stealing and publication" of another author's "language, thoughts, ideas, or expressions" and the representation of them as one's own original work. Plagiarism is considered academic dishonesty and a breach of journalistic ethics." Where is one claiming that the used "expression" is one's own work? Of course, nowhere. Beyond that, a proper acknowledgement of every published record out there is not really feasible within a tweet itself. If one really wants to push this into calling plagiarism, since the affected article is published under Creative Commons license, one should tell them that instead of using it for his/her own purpose in a forum - I guess, they will not move a finger, not only cause it is a tweet (and not a (scientific) article or patent) but also since that tweet is working toward the same goal as the article. |
|
|
|
A recording of the live community update has been published on YouTube - if you missed the meeting on Monday, you can listen to its recording now: https://youtu.be/u0TcHk1aLEQ |
|
|
|
The exchange CryptoBridge has announced that they are closing their doors. (for more information please see http://crypto-bridge.org/). User verification is required (as defined by EU law) to withdraw from their exchange. Please take action as soon as possible in order to secure PAC or any other asset you might have there. Please be reminded that the CryptoBridge exchange ( http://crypto-bridge.org/) is closing very soon. Make sure you withdraw your PAC or any other asset you might have there. |
|
|
|
The above is nonsense - the mentioned video was made roughly 2 months ago, whereas CryptoBridge released their plan to close their doors less than two weeks ago. |
|
|
|
Geniuses are the exception as opposed to the rule. If you don't understand that, I can't help you sorry... But I'm waiting your response as it seems you are the kind of guy who want to have the last word. So be my guest... I have an article to finish. I let you Waffling alone your nonsense. Another one to ny ignore list  Many, many "geniuses" in the world then, all exceptions to your rule, for example https://www.thegentlemansjournal.com/20-of-the-most-successful-businessmen-without-degrees/Please make sure you do not insult or troll anyone in your "article". |
|
|
|
1- You compare Drew with geniuses like Bill gates 2- I'm not a pac community anymore since the day you banned me 3- You don't know me. You don't even know what I've built. 4- All my activities on internet are just hobbies, nothing to do with my real job or life. 5- Honestly, I don't even read all your messages. Just skimming. As I think everyone here. Don't waste your time writing books. Nobody takes you seriously. 6- Explain your marketing plan7- Explain your marketing plan8- ... 1. No, I am not. You claimed a CEO needs a formal education, when the reality is quite the opposite. 2. I see. Why were you banned in the first place? 3. I am not pretending that I know you - you do seem mad every time you write something here... 4. Thank God. 5. I have noticed that you are not reading my messages properly - are you saying that you are just trolling? 6. No, you are not a member of PAC community (see point 2 of your post). 7. See directly above. |
|
|
|
One can say "twisting" to anything I say, literally anything - hence, it is a moot argument. It is used by you when you have run out of any real arguments.
What arguments you want me to answer while there is no answer at all? you re funny and a manipulator. You could be a good politician Cookiess. But let's continue. I'm not convinced about your arguments about you could be a good CEO without any study. You can have the QUALITY TO BE a good CEO after your study, because there is a lot to learn about how the business world works. Like the "Conflict of interests" that you and your CEO doesn't seems to understand. And also dealing with a conflict with a community member...  Can you, please, look up what kind of (real not honorary) degrees, for example, Bill Gates (over 10 years the richest man in the world, former head of Microsoft) and Mark Zuckerberg (current head of Facebook) have? No one in their clear mind would show any PAC Global team plans to you, a hostile person. Why? No matter how good the plans might be, you would use that information against the team and try to reduce the chances of the project success important to the PAC community. Also, you are not a representative of the PAC community in any form.
That's not true! The africa thing is a good thing and you see I didn't critisized it. So you are lying here to hide you don't have a real marketing plan. Let me get this straight: since you have not criticised the "africa thing", I am lying? You are, unfortunately but clearly, jumping to conclusions. And Remind me. How many people in your community?
I'm not talking about people who just invest in a pac masternodes just for quick ROI, and then just dump their coins harming the project. Those don't even follow the news or simply doesn't care about the future of Pac. You are losing people month after month.
Well, you seem to be misinformed, since there is no real quick ROI with masternodes in the Altcoin market, which is bleeding for a couple of years now. In other words, most if not all of people who have bought PAC (masternodes) is in it for a long term. The number of PAC masternodes is on a constant rise (probably mostly as people keep bringing their nodes to the current 0.14.0.4 version). It is hard to know how many people are actually part of the PAC community - a shear number of PAC Global discord members is very high (close to 10000) and hence not realistic, then there is a number of active users at any time on the PAC Global discord server (which is normally a few hundreds), then there is a number of PAC masternodes (over 6800 now). Lets say, I have counted over 40 different individuals asking for help with their wallets/masternodes in the past two weeks, without counting any those, who are active in general-chat or other channels and those not in the discord server. Since not everyone does need help or they get their help elsewhere (e.g. PAC FAQ), that number is most likely only a fraction of people owning PAC and following the news. You are actually alone in your request(s) and claims - please check the recent weeks of this thread for clear evidence of that. You are literally alone in complaining and being hostile against the PAC Global team and project.
Bro, let's be clear. I strictly DON'T CARE about who follow me or not, my aim is to reach people from outside of PAC. I will dry you out until you disappear, and that thanks to you and drew, who chose the escalation of the conflict with me.
This takes us right back to the first question I have asked about drew's qualification to be a CEO, and that he would learn at school: "How to deal with a conflict when you are a CEO"
See, All that thing would not have happened if only you knew how to deal with a community member. You don't seem to understand what path you took with me. Omg, calm down, you are going to get a heart attack if you continue like that. If you would have used all that energy to create something (instead of trying to destroy something), you could have built "a house" already. I have to ask: do you (still) see yourself as a member of the PAC community? |
|
|
|
Let's twist again... Litterally NO answer The marketing is not for me but for people around. So please give to the community a proof of a marketing plan. The truth: There is NO marketing plan!And for the morons thing, that's clearly about you and your team that gave up to the idiot CEO. Bad faith. You showed your real face. Twist and twist again. Show us your marketing plan. One can say "twisting" to anything I say, literally anything - hence, it is a moot argument. It is used by you when you have run out of any real arguments. No one in their clear mind would show any PAC Global team plans to you, a hostile person. Why? No matter how good the plans might be, you would use that information against the team and try to reduce the chances of the project success important to the PAC community. Also, you are not a representative of the PAC community in any form. You are actually alone in your request(s) and claims - please check the recent weeks of this thread for clear evidence of that. You are literally alone in complaining and being hostile against the PAC Global team and project. |
|
|
|
Oh I precise. Don't get me wrong, I have nothing against Robin personaly, I believe he is a good guy.
But I think you are doing a diversion as the biggest problem of your team actually is not the CMO but the CEO, because this position is the most important of the project.
Thus, Could you tell us what is the qualification of Drew as a CEO?
I repeat, Could you tell us what is the qualification of Drew as a CEO?
For that is no clear answer - a CEO needs many skills and many of these are not taught in a college or at a university. Is there any degree one really must have to be a successful CEO? Not really. Since I know that the above answer will make you mad, let me try another, also valid answer: Drew was the only one who was ready to take that responsibility on him. PAC owners accepted it then (otherwise they would not install his teams wallet) and still accept it. |
|
|
|
Are you autistic? I'm serious. Not mocking you.
Robin is a student in industrial engineering. That's the point HE IS NOT a professional in MARKETING nor have any degree in this field. HE IS NOT qualified to be a CMO.
Do you understand? Are you autistic?
Do you understand? I repeat...
Robin is a student in industrial engineering. That's the point HE IS NOT a professional in MARKETING.
I know you are paid by the number of words, but please stay focus on the important point. Look at the moon not the finger.
Again wrong, I am not paid by the number of words. Again, please, do not insult. In contrast to mechanical engineering, do note that a significant part of industrial engineering is marketing/economics, organizational behavior and covers creation of (dynamic) company models. In addition, marketing projects such as quantitative/qualitative research and writing/executing business cases/research setups/proposals is part of being an industrial engineer. To your point: How does one become "a professional in marketing" (even those who have a relevant degree) if not by doing it? Robin has been directly promoting PAC for roughly a couple of years now through PAC charity. the marketing plan then. A real professional one? I am waiting. I repeat: Explain the marketing plan, please. Thank you You are not entitled to see (any details of) the marketing plan, I am sorry. Reason: your intentions are simply and clearly hostile. |
|
|
|
Unlike you, I do not think that people are stupid. Please be reminded that it is you who actually called everyone holding PAC "morons" just a little while ago.
LIAR I never said people holding pac are morons but the shills are! Here is my answer to Maciej, one of your shills team: Now you can't even ask for Binance as you already are in the number one Exchange. Morons... lol Keep with your bad faith you and your team the LIARS. People are not stupid and see how you twist to avoid real questions. It is not a fight between me and you. What do you think new people coming here will think? lol You are actually harming your own business Cookiess. Keep going, you help me a lot Let me quote your entry from this thread: "And btw... IF someone put up a DAO and Drew disagree with this DAO, how could we know he will not use his 1723 votes against the DAO. You morrons literaly give Pac project to the narcissistic DREW..." All people who installed the first version of the wallet issued by the Drew and his team have "given" the PAC as project to Drew and his team. Since just about everyone owning PAC has actually installed that wallet, you have called everyone holding PAC "morons". |
|
|
|
Are you autistic? I'm serious. Not mocking you.
Robin is a student in industrial engineering. That's the point HE IS NOT a professional in MARKETING nor have any degree in this field. HE IS NOT qualified to be a CMO.
Do you understand? Are you autistic?
Do you understand? I repeat...
Robin is a student in industrial engineering. That's the point HE IS NOT a professional in MARKETING.
I know you are paid by the number of words, but please stay focus on the important point. Look at the moon not the finger.
Again wrong, I am not paid by the number of words. Again, please, do not insult. In contrast to mechanical engineering, do note that a significant part of industrial engineering is marketing/economics, organizational behavior and covers creation of (dynamic) company models. In addition, marketing projects such as quantitative/qualitative research and writing/executing business cases/research setups/proposals is part of being an industrial engineer. To your point: How does one become "a professional in marketing" (even those who have a relevant degree) if not by doing it? Robin has been directly promoting PAC for roughly a couple of years now through PAC charity. |
|
|
|
The 3 december i have withdraw 549.765 PAcglobal from graviex. In the same day i have send 150.000 pac to stakecube address, and i see 399.765 in my wallet. today i open wallet and see balance 0 and a incoming transiction MINTED from 7 december with 0 confirmation. Later this transiction, all my pac disappered. Why ? this is my address http://explorer.pacglobal.io/address/PTRtsckgse21ZgjtLqAjeM2qgCcNvmxZW4The sum of PAC you have has simply staked. If the transaction with 0 confirmations has the status "0/confirmed, not in a memory pool" you can simply right-mouse click it and select "Abandon transaction". That should recover the funds (provided that your wallet is otherwise doing fine). If you need further help, you can also join PAC discord server so one can chat with you (and exchange e.g. screenshots if desired). |
|
|
|
As usual... you try to muddy the waters. Twist, twist...
The fact is Pac is a decentralized and a private blockchain belonging to a private company, belonging to a narcissistic CEO, now.
So I recommend anyone to think twice before investing to pac global.
There is hundreds of better project, lead by real professionals.
I feel bad for that guy who just lost 800k pac from a banned address (cryptopia). Coz if the court who is in charge of the liquidation release the coins, he will not be able to receive them anyway. If there was a little chance for him to recover, now it's definitely dead thanks to Drew's blind politics.
You are the one consistently getting things wrong (on purpose or not) - every second post of mine is about simply correcting your mistakes and misinterpretations. For that reason, literally nothing you say or write can be taken as a fact, and needs to be checked and re-checked. Now you show your real face. Attacking the form, typos, etc... To discredite my arguments. That just shows that I am 100% true. You can't attack the arguments so you attack the form. Basically, this chinese expression concerns you directly: "When a Wise Man Points at the Moon, The Fool Looks at the Finger" Do you really think people are that stupid cookiess? Soon Cookiess you will see a bunch of beautiful and well written articles about Pac, and how it is decentralized. As well as how the CEO is in conflict of interest. Thanks me later Unlike you, I do not think that people are stupid. Please be reminded that it is you who actually called everyone holding PAC "morons" just a little while ago. Am I only correcting the form and the typos? Of course not, half of your central arguments that you use to prove your points are simply wrong - there is a large amount evidence in this very thread that you cannot properly read and understand simple things which are clearly written out or need a bit of research to be properly identified. For example, you claimed multiple times that the PAC Global CMO is mechnical enigneer, but he is not. There is rather big difference between that occupation/education and the one PAC Global CMO currently has. For a more recent example, in the post above you again claim that the PAC is a private blockchain, but one finds following: "When we talk about public blockchains, what most people are really talking about is a public open blockchain. It’s a blockchain where anybody can write data to the blockchain, and anybody else can come and read that data." or "In a private blockchain, only the entities participating in a transaction will have knowledge about it, whereas the others will not be able to access it." (the source of the latter: https://www.blockchain-council.org/blockchain/public-vs-private-blockchain-a-comprehensive-comparison/) from which is clear that PAC is not a private blockchain. |
|
|
|
After reviewing the PAC masternode network, there appears to be a few masternodes suffering from performance issues due to excessive peer connections. The PDF linked below shows the potentially affected masternodes. PAC Global team suggests updating to the newest wallet version available (b5cdfa551) as it reduces the required amount of intra-masternode (or quorum) connections to a moderate amount, without affecting network security.
A few? Really? Be precise Cookiess. It'sannoying to always correct you. But well you re used to following the way the team manage business (promoting exchanges with fake data, a fake youtube video with fake 15k subs, etc.) 1200 Vs 5000 is not few to me. Think twice before investing to $pac guys Especially when you know they mint coins. #litecoinfam #blockchain #Crypto #paccoin https://t.co/mVICDB23uSNo, I am not wrong - the linked PDF is showing the potentially affected masternode and not affected masternodes. The evidence that supports that is clear: in a growing network of PAC masternodes (currently 6793, close to 1000 more than a few weeks ago) currently only 433 are not enabled (and not only to excessive peer connections, but for whatever reason that might be). |
|
|
|
As usual... you try to muddy the waters. Twist, twist...
The fact is Pac is a decentralized and a private blockchain belonging to a private company, belonging to a narcissistic CEO, now.
So I recommend anyone to think twice before investing to pac global.
There is hundreds of better project, lead by real professionals.
I feel bad for that guy who just lost 800k pac from a banned address (cryptopia). Coz if the court who is in charge of the liquidation release the coins, he will not be able to receive them anyway. If there was a little chance for him to recover, now it's definitely dead thanks to Drew's blind politics.
You are the one consistently getting things wrong (on purpose or not) - every second post of mine is about simply correcting your mistakes and misinterpretations. For that reason, literally nothing you say or write can be taken as a fact, and needs to be checked and re-checked. |
|
|
|
Well, it is not a paper "from" University of Zürich - only one of the authors appears to be from ETH Zürich actually, and not from University of Zürich. Does it hurts? It is usual that the research is first awarded to the uni of the research leader, which is here M. Gervais from ETH Zürich. ETH Zurich is a science, technology, engineering and mathematics university in the city of Zürich, Switzerland... In the 2020 edition of the QS World University Rankings ETH Zurich has been ranked 6th in the world (2nd in Europe after the University of Oxford),[6] which represents a one place improvement compared to the 2019 edition,[7] and is also ranked 13th in the world by the Times Higher Education World Rankings 2018 (4th in Europe after Oxbridge and Imperial College London).But if you prefer, you can award this research to the third school: HEC Paris... Which is one of the most famous and prestigious french shool of business, ask Maciej if you don't believe me No seriously Cookiess, do not play this denial game here... It is interesting how (over)confident you are - here is the explanation - do read carefully: 1. University of Zürich is a separate entity from ETH Zürich - you are still mixing them up. The named author is (or was at the time the paper was published) from ETH Zürich and not from University of Zürich, as claimed by you. 2. Nobody tried to say that ETH Zürich is bad - it is indeed famous and more known than the University of Zürich. You simply misunderstood and thought that I am trying to marginalise its importance / quality, while I was just pointing to another mistake of your "research". 3. Just to correct you again: the grant holder/hosting laboratory head is normally the last author of a research paper. Hence the research gets assigned normally to the last author's institution (and not first), unless it is a joint research / review paper of fellow peers where this matters less (for more information, please read the following article from one of the most famous / quoted science journals out there (next to Nature): https://www.sciencemag.org/careers/2010/04/conventions-scientific-authorship) Again, I am not trying to dispute the quality of the institutions, I am simply observing that your attempts to understand and convey even the simplest facts are full of your mistakes and misinterpretations. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
