|
Dear Friends,
thank you all for the answers.
Dear Jupiter2030,
looks reasonable to say that it is also very convenient to pay for any services directly from BestMixer using the function of our Fee calculator "To specify the exact amount".
Ideally, if you would like to pay for two or more services with time delays from your order page.
In this case, there is no need to study how coin control works.
Best regards,
BestMixer Team
|
|
|
|
Dear 100bitcoin,
our system is unable to determine the origin of the coins sent to the pool.
No project in the world can determine the origin of the coins in 100% of cases. It's technically impossible.
For this reason, coins with a criminal past could get into any system or personal wallet.
As for our Terms of Use, they prohibit use of the service directly or indirectly in any illegal schemes.
The user is fully responsible in this case.Could you explain why you are claiming to offer fully anonimity and freedom, answer to no one/government policies and serve customers from anywhere in the world while your terms of service basically forbids every reason why someone would want to use a mixer?
Dear TheNewAnon135246,
if the criminal purposes are priority and necessary personally for you, then you should bear full responsibility for such activity since according to our Terms it is forbidden to use our service for it.
Best regards,
BestMixer Team |
|
|
|
|
Dear damnconfused,
our support team has replied to you into the ticket.
Best regards,
BestMixer Team
|
|
|
|
|
Dear crossevian,
our support has replied to you almost immediately that you have to provide a Letter of Guarantee to receive any comments regarding the order.
For the security and anonymity of our customers, we do not provide any information on the order without a Letter of Guarantee.
You still haven't provided a Letter of Guarantee.
But please note that you have your order number, and with it you can check the order and monitor the order status online.
The support has sent you the link to the video instructions on how to use our service.
Since you have posted your order number publicly, we recommend you to use our mixer again when you receive your funds,
since in the current situation any user can monitor the status of your order in real time.
At the time of publication of this post you will receive your funds in 21 hours.
And yes, you did set a delay of 72 hours, so you have been expecting your funds already for a long time and you will expect them for some time more.
You have set the time delay by yourself during the order, and the support can not help you to change this setting now.
P.S. NowYouAreSee, TryNinja, thanks for your help.
|
|
|
|
Dear Friends,
amid active discussion of ChipMixer advantages over BestMixer in this thread, we would like to express our opinion.
We analyzed the work of ChipMixer and came to the conclusion that this project is not a reliable solution for anonymizing your transactions in the bitcoin network.
Based on the open data on the method of chip generation and their exact amounts, we were able to create a website, which in real time displays the full statistics of outgoing transactions of ChipMixer.
This analytical website is available at: http://chipstatdethbuwk.onion/
We believe that after the publication of this information, you will also change your opinion about the reliability of this project as a mixer.
Best regards,
BestMixer team
|
|
|
|
Dear Friends,
about a year ago you asked us about our opinion on ChipMixer.com:At that time, we did not study in detail the architecture of this project and only noted the fact that it is unusual.
In the recently created topic of ChipMixer VS BestMixer comparison there are many people voted for the Chipmixer.
We decided to analyze whether it is really good. The analysis took no more than 24 hours.
Within this time, we created a website with detailed statistics of Chipmixer.
This site is available at: http://chipstatdethbuwk.onion/
For the analysis, we only needed to know the method of chip generation and their exact amounts.
After 10 hours of parsing of the previous 10.000 blocks, we have collected a complete database of all transactions of this pseudo mixer.
We believe that this project is not a reliable solution for anonymizing your transactions.
We are waiting for your comments in the thread created for this comparison: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5125942.20
Best regards,
BestMIxer Team
|
|
|
|
|
Dear Friends,
the service is fully restored after an attack attempt.
Payments are processed and executed normally.
Thank you all for keeping patient and trusting our service.
Best regards,
BestMixer Team
|
|
|
|
|
Dear Friends,
our service has been attacked recently.
At the moment all payments are stopped.
Technical works are carried out.
We do our best to resume the service as soon as possible.
We expect it will not take more than 72 hours.
We bring our apologies for this inconvenience.
Best regards,
BestMixer Team
|
|
|
|
what happens if the transaction is not confirmed within 24h?
Hello fmonts,
if someone has sent a payment to the incoming address generated by the service
and this transaction does not receive a miner's confirmation within 24 hours,
it still remains active until it receives a miner's confirmation and is processed by our service according to the settings of the order.
Please, do not hesitate to find more information in the FAQ section on our website.
Best regards,
BestMixer Team |
|
|
|
Dear Friends,
we are pleased to announce that BestMixer signature campaign has started today.
We thank everyone who has already joined us and Hhampuz for the successful organization!
As for other pleasant events of the last days, it is also worth noting the publication about our bitcoin mixer by Bitcoin86, the popular Chinese crypto news website.
Best regards,
BestMixer Team
|
|
|
|
Dear Friends,
we are pleased to announce the completion of the first of the two parts of a major system update that aims to enhance the protection of anonymity for our customers and a wider scope of application.
We got rid of the pattern that does not allow any other mixer on the market to fulfill an order in which 3 receiving addresses will get 3 identical amounts.
It significantly complicates the work of the Chainalysis and brings the privacy protection of our customers to a new level.
Other mixers provide only a percentage distribution of funds to the receiving addresses.
Moreover, now you can create orders with the exact amount to be received for one or more addresses.
It is very convenient for anonymous cryptocurrency payment for various services and products on the Internet. Follow the nearest announcements and thank you for staying with us,
BestMixer Team
|
|
|
|
|
LoyceV, thank you for creating the thread Red trust on Bestmixer: is this justified?.
NowYouAreSee, we appreciate a lot that you're looking for answers between the lines.
Thank you,
BestMixer Team
|
|
|
|
|
TheNewAnon135246, our opposing views can be considered biased against each other with equal probability.
Perhaps your second question will find its answer later when members Lauda and LeGaulois react to the main question of this thread regarding the red trust.
|
|
|
|
|
TheNewAnon135246, your question does not correspond to the topic of this thread.
Also, it does not explain the reasons for your comment on How CoinJoin works here "Posts misinformation about Wasabi wallet (and CoinJoin) to make their own centralized mixer look superior..." since it looks more like your personal opinion which can be expressed in the post but not by red trust.
Your comment may mislead some members of the forum and eloquently demonstrates your misconception of WW work too (see post above).
|
|
|
|
In this thread, three forum members downgraded our trust level [Lauda/TheNewAnon135246/LeGaulois] are trying to justify their opinions and actions. It would be reasonable if our opinion on this issue also turns out to be here.All of them referred to the post in our thread here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3140140.msg48348938#msg48348938Lauda clearly indicated an expression that he was not satisfied with in our post, published in our ANN thread: “The main problem of Wasabiwallet is that EVERYONE knows the incoming address and EVERYONE knows the receiving addresses.” This was followed by a trust downgrade of our project and a comment from Lauda: “Misleading people about a competitor is a weak method to establish a trust. You should also learn how CoinJoin works.”
It would be right to draw the readers' attention to this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3140140.msg49283193#msg49283193, where highly respected developer Nopara73, a Wasabiwallet (WW) developer, responds to our saying “EVERYONE knows the incoming address and EVERYONE knows the receiving addresses” with the following comment: “Everyone may know the addresses, but....” So it seems like Lauda doesn't quite understand how CoinJoin works. We would advise Lauda to consult highly respected developer Nopara73 why all inputs and outputs are known to everyone when using CoinJoin. We are engaged in the anonymization of cryptocurrency and we believe that the technology, where everyone knows all the addresses involved in the rounds, can not be effectively used for this purpose. Not because it is easy or difficult to find out who is who after but simply because anyone can find out all the involved addresses regardless of how many inputs and outputs there are. And such a way is very convenient for the work of the Сhainalysis since there is no need to collect data because it is already collected and combined to apply the following processing patterns. LeGaulois edifies “Misleading people about a competitor is a weak method to establish a trust. You should also learn how CoinJoin works.” The categorical nature of this statement regarding our opinion presupposes the only true statement — his personal. Oh, and as for his “also learn how CoinJoin works”, it may be advisable LeGaulois also explore statements of Nopara73 about his product. TheNewAnon135246 believes that “Spreading lies about Wasabi wallet (and CoinJoin) to make their own centralized mixer look superior, causing potential customers being intentionally mislead.” We would give the same reply as for Lauda. TheNewAnon135246, it would be nice of you to remove from your post in our thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3140140.msg49283746#msg49283746 a link to WW because to place a hidden advertisement in someone else's thread is at least not polite, even when it is disguised as a respected project the official Github. We hope you [Lauda/TheNewAnon135246/LeGaulois] have found here the answers you weren't looking for… Thanks to your actions, the attitude of some members to the red trust has changed. That’s a pity. |
|
|
|
why do you have a red trust IGCGamers, thanks for asking. We were also surprised by the "new rules" of this forum on January 17, 2019, when three members with a high rating (TheNewAnon135246, LeGaulois, Lauda) simultaneously felt "deceived" and decided to indicate their disagreement exactly by lowering the trust of our service but by expressing their opinion in our thread. In other words, a collective simultaneous downgrade by prior agreement can isolate on the forum a company or any member whose opinion is undesirable for some reason.
The second time we were surprised a little bit when the moderators of the forum in response to our request for clarification of these action completely ignored it, thereby taking the side of those who took part in the downgrade.
We believe the readers of our thread and all the members of the forum are able to draw the right conclusions from this.
This is our post from November 30, 2018,
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3140140.msg48348938#msg48348938
was designated as a reason for downgrade. Note that we have shared our opinion by this post in our thread and in response to a user's question (his original post was deleted by moderator). In this forum, this is referred to as "spreading lies". Peremptorily.
We agree to disagree, even if it leads to a further downgrade and block the account of our service on this forum by the will of the moderators, loyal to such action.
Friends, once a question arose in this thread, share your opinions about this situation.
Best regards,
BestMixer Team |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
