 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 »
|
*** Please Check Out the Galilel Reddit Channel! ***As mentioned by 'cryptogerman' the other day, Galilel now has a Reddit channel. Whilst I personally set up a Reddit account ages ago, I hadn't ever actually used it; that is until yesterday when I decided it was about time that I did, especially as Galilel now have a presence. All these different social media platforms can take a bit of getting used to and there is no doubt that it is easier to stick to what you know rather than face the slightly daunting task of getting your head around yet another new site. Different platforms attract different people for various reasons; the look, the feel, the conversation, the vibe and the people you interact with. If you are a regular user of bitcointalk and have yet to venture over to Reddit, I strongly urge you to do so - I'm really impressed! So why not head over there too and make up your own mind? Whether you are an existing supporter of Galilel and have a few coins, or if you are just doing some research into this project, with Galilel now having a Reddit channel, what better reason do you need to check that platform out? Here's a link - now there's no excuse not to - all you have to do is click it! https://www.reddit.com/r/Galilel/  It's really nice to see all these activities on many different social networks. So, everyone can easily follow progress of the Galilel project. Well that's the plan behind it:-) |
|
|
|
I was delighted to see the transcript of Maik Broemme's interview with Masternodes Germany published on Medium in English - I'm sure I'm not the only person with an interest in the Galilel Project that doesn't speak German who has been feeling a little left out since that interview aired! If you haven't already seen/read it then I highly recommend that you do so. It provides a comprehensive overview as to where the project came from, what has been achieved and furthermore the future direction. It is a little out of date, as the Masternodes Germany interview was some weeks ago and things have moved on a bit since then, but better late than never! It would be great if Maik and other team members could generate more exposure for GALI by getting interviews on other platforms too - video content is always popular so I hope their English is up to the task, but please don't keep us waiting for translations!  We also wish to push translations faster. However nobody of us is a professional content writer. So producing high quality content and translating it takes obviously more time than would be the case when someone does it whose profession it is. In general we rather take a bit longer when this means that we can ensure that the published content is of a high quality. Mid-term we are looking to expand the team with a professional content writer. You are right once we have the content, the aim is to push it on other platforms which we also did with past content. Here the community can be of great help since everyone knows of a platform/venue that maybe team members are not aware of. Especially in the past few weeks several community members came forward with suggestions. With regard to video content it's really difficult. Most people that do it charge a good amount of money for it and it is really hard to gauge wether that money is spend well on video marketing. However something we have in mind for the future is def an AMA. Wether it is in the form of a video or written or maybe both has to be seen. |
|
|
|
What the F@ck? Klingon! now i have heard it all
Mind you thats what you would call love and effort for the coin.
Just purchased 30000 coins, hopefully it will become a retirement fund.
even with the recent purchase the stakes are coming in quickly, love this coin.
praise be to Galilel coin and oh the klingon empire.
Yeah, we had to search a bit to find someone who could do it:-) |
|
|
|
I do like the master node services that galilel coin has been listed on.
I also like the exchanges its listed on as well. I love graviex and crex24.
Trying to buy some today actually.
Crex 24 is okay but it's great for coins since the listing fees are so cheap really. Graviex is cool i like graviex a bit more to the exchange than other cryptocurrency exchanges these days. I tend to use both Crex and Graviex, depending on the crypto I need to trade. Both exchanges have not yet disappointed me (so far). Of course, the bulk of my crypto's (GALI) I keep in my own wallets: staking nicely  Yes i agree having GALI staking in your own wallet is wise, always take your crypto-currencies out of exchanges when ever you can, since exchanges get hacked and they have the private keys. I'm still waiting for my first stake with GALI to be honest, hope it's not too far away yeah still waiting for some money to come through to purchase some. I lost some crypto in the cryptopia hack, it's definitely not a fun experience to be honest. what stack size do you guys stake with to get frequent rewards (daily) ? You can use this tool to get estimates for specific staking amounts: https://stakingreturns.com/coins/galilelKeep in mind that the numbers are for regular staking. If you stake zGali you get considerably higher returns. |
|
|
|
It's been a pretty exciting past twelve hours or so; Galilel announcing the establishment of a corporate entity and BTC making a dramatic move upwards, possibly signalling the end of the bear market. I think the stars are starting to align nicely now and GALI will continue to go from strength to strength. Whilst many of us in the cryptosphere tend to look at short timeframes, hoping for instant gains, after a while you soon come to realise that that is just 'noise'. You only get a clear picture of trends by looking at higher timeframes. This is particularly applicable to GALI given that it is a young currency. In my opinion the team are making all the right moves - a slowly but surely approach to building a genuinely successful project rather than a reckless pursuit of instant riches with no substance. It's important to keep an eye on your investments, but just imagine switching off from GALI for the next few years...I feel sure your eyes would/will pop out of your head when you see where we are then compared to now!
Those are indeed some interesting developments. In what country would the GALI company be registered? In Germany. This will also give a form of government official proof of the people behind the project, something which a service like KYC could never offer. By this time I have seen many projects, that initially claim, that this procedure KYC is not needed. but when it was a while, they announced? that it was necessary Sorry I made a typo. Which I wanted to say is KYD as in the service. Edited it Cheers But i honestly feel like Know Your Developer will supply a developer with a lot more trust between the community and the developer. It would be a wise decision to be verified. Ill be watching GALI closely myself. We are already verified there https://review.kydcoin.io/galicoin/What I was refering to is that this is a private service, while a registered company provides a whole different level of trust since it is verified by the government/state and identities are registered in a state registry. |
|
|
|
It's been a pretty exciting past twelve hours or so; Galilel announcing the establishment of a corporate entity and BTC making a dramatic move upwards, possibly signalling the end of the bear market. I think the stars are starting to align nicely now and GALI will continue to go from strength to strength. Whilst many of us in the cryptosphere tend to look at short timeframes, hoping for instant gains, after a while you soon come to realise that that is just 'noise'. You only get a clear picture of trends by looking at higher timeframes. This is particularly applicable to GALI given that it is a young currency. In my opinion the team are making all the right moves - a slowly but surely approach to building a genuinely successful project rather than a reckless pursuit of instant riches with no substance. It's important to keep an eye on your investments, but just imagine switching off from GALI for the next few years...I feel sure your eyes would/will pop out of your head when you see where we are then compared to now!
Those are indeed some interesting developments. In what country would the GALI company be registered? In Germany. This will also give a form of government official proof of the people behind the project, something which a service like KYC could never offer. By this time I have seen many projects, that initially claim, that this procedure KYC is not needed. but when it was a while, they announced? that it was necessary Sorry I made a typo. Which I wanted to say is KYD as in the service. Edited it Cheers |
|
|
|
It's been a pretty exciting past twelve hours or so; Galilel announcing the establishment of a corporate entity and BTC making a dramatic move upwards, possibly signalling the end of the bear market. I think the stars are starting to align nicely now and GALI will continue to go from strength to strength. Whilst many of us in the cryptosphere tend to look at short timeframes, hoping for instant gains, after a while you soon come to realise that that is just 'noise'. You only get a clear picture of trends by looking at higher timeframes. This is particularly applicable to GALI given that it is a young currency. In my opinion the team are making all the right moves - a slowly but surely approach to building a genuinely successful project rather than a reckless pursuit of instant riches with no substance. It's important to keep an eye on your investments, but just imagine switching off from GALI for the next few years...I feel sure your eyes would/will pop out of your head when you see where we are then compared to now!
Those are indeed some interesting developments. In what country would the GALI company be registered? In Germany. This will also give a form of government official proof of the people behind the project, something which a service like KYD* could never offer. *edited KYC to KYD. MAde a typo |
|
|
|
This may seem a bit random and is a question probably best answered by Babyface or perhaps Swooty, but if anyone else is able to provide a response, please go ahead...
My daughter bought an Amazon Echo the other day and this morning we've been having a bit of fun trying out various commands and seeing what information the device can look up. It was very simple to obtain the price of BTC, albeit it was probably a global average price as we wouldn't obtain a price specific to an exchange. Of course I then had to ask what the price of GALI is...it didn't come up with any information whatsoever, including when I tried commands for both Graviex and Crex24.
So the million dollar question is how can we get GALI recognised by Amazon Echo, and even better still, specific to an exchange? It may seem rather novel/trivial, but I think it could provide us with some great marketing material! Come on devs - there's a challenge for you to add a bit of fun into the daily grind of coding!
Need to see where they get their price feed from and get on that site. Google for example takes the price feed of Coinbase. So you need to get on Coinbase. Would have to look who Amazon uses. If it's CMC it's doable. If it's Coinbase I'd say no chance |
|
|
|
This may seem a bit random and is a question probably best answered by Babyface or perhaps Swooty, but if anyone else is able to provide a response, please go ahead...
My daughter bought an Amazon Echo the other day and this morning we've been having a bit of fun trying out various commands and seeing what information the device can look up. It was very simple to obtain the price of BTC, albeit it was probably a global average price as we wouldn't obtain a price specific to an exchange. Of course I then had to ask what the price of GALI is...it didn't come up with any information whatsoever, including when I tried commands for both Graviex and Crex24.
So the million dollar question is how can we get GALI recognised by Amazon Echo, and even better still, specific to an exchange? It may seem rather novel/trivial, but I think it could provide us with some great marketing material! Come on devs - there's a challenge for you to add a bit of fun into the daily grind of coding!
Need to see where they get their price feed from and get on that site. Google for example takes the price feed of Coinbase. So you need to get on Coinbase. Would have to look who Amazon uses. If it's CMC it's doable. If it's Coinbase I'd say no chance |
|
|
|
GALI Airdrops?
Has Galilel Project ever done an airdrop?
I'm wondering whether this is something you (team!) would consider doing via a recognised platform such as AirdropAlert.com or Airdrops.io? I've also noticed that recently more exchanges (including Graviex and Crex24) offer airdrops in the form of faucets that you can claim periodically.
Regardless of whether you would or wouldn't do a GALI airdrop, it would be interesting to discuss the pros and cons, merits or otherwise of airdrops. Could this be a beneficial means of broadening the reach of GALI and expanding our community?
From my own perspective I can honestly say that I have received some airdrops (including ERC-20 tokens deposited directly into MEW with no interaction required from me whatsoever) that has led me to researching and investing in projects that I might otherwise never have discovered.
I think there is a legitimate case to discuss the subject here!
We had a faucet when listing on CREX. In general our experience with these kind of promotions are rather negative. Same with bountys. It only attracts people who want to gather free coins in order to dump them in the market. Furthermore it deters people genuinely interested in Gali because they see people getting free coins for the sole purpose of dumping them. So going forward there won't be any airdrops and also no more bountys that are not value adding(i.e. invitation bounties for example). Will there be value adding bountys? Sure we still have bountys for translations and stuff like that that actually adds value to the project. However there won't be anymore promotions where we only attract people who dump the coins |
|
|
|
You gave the explanation yourself. You can see it in a lot of coins that it is a bot which does it. Galilel will not engage in such practices or pay third parties to do it. First it is illegal. Second we believe not everybody is stupid. I think this dissuades people who are genuinely interested in the project longterm when they see that the team engages in such tactics or doesn't condemn them just for short term success. Faking volume just to convey people a sense of safety is pure deception and imho reflects very poorly on the project itself. And when you arrive at this point it's not about CMC anymore but rather if this is a project that can be trusted. Besides that like I said it is illegal to do it.
At least GALI is listed at Coinpaprika (which I actually prefer above CMC lately). GALI stands at a very respectable #1312 at the moment and has been rising. Thanks for the response eshby - I'm glad to see that a member of the team is actively monitoring Bitcointalk! The volume side of things is very frustrating but I appreciate your stance to playing fair. Perhaps over the course of time those projects that are manipulating the true picture will fall by the wayside and projects like Galilel will gain the recognition they truly deserve. It's a shame that the cryptosphere places so much value on the information found at CoinMarketCap - as m3mbr44n points out, there are alternative platforms such as Coinpaprika (which I am also swaying towards lately). Hopefully CMC will gradually lose its perception as being 'the holy grail' of listings! Funny since we were just talking about it https://www.bloomberg.com/amp/news/articles/2019-03-25/crypto-aggregator-says-concerns-over-inaccurate-data-are-valid?__twitter_impression=true |
|
|
|
OK so I may be accused of impatience, but I've no doubt we're all still wondering when (if ever!) Galilel will get listed on CoinMarketCap? I think it must be several weeks now since it came to light that CMC had apparently overlooked the fact that Babyface sent answers to all their questions months ago, yet we haven't heard another word from them. One thing that concerns me slightly (and I would be grateful if someone from the team could provide an answer to this) is that this morning, when doing a bit of research into other cryptos, I read somewhere that to be listed on CMC they require your token to have a minimum trading volume of USD$5k per day. If that is the case then that may explain why we have yet to get listed - alternatively what I read could simply be inaccurate and misleading. Anybody?  There is a volume requirement. However CMC itself doesn't put a specific number on it. All they say is they don't consider fake volume to count against it (which by my assessment can not be true, since plenty of projects with obvious insane fake volume get listed). Currently it probably comes down to volume which we have no influence on. Sadly everytime we submit the requested information we get a copy/paste reply that someone from CMC will look into it and come back to us. As you might guess it's not possible for us to ask what they specifically think is missing so it's all a guessing game for us too. However seeing that they list forked projects with no inhouse developer at all we guess it is volume. I understand that people get impatient. Unfortunately remaining patient is all we can do since we simply have no control over the process. Also keep in mind that CMC doesn't just request simple one liner's with regard to information. By now Babyface submitted several times new information on their request which takes a good amount of time. So on his end this process is also connected to a lot of work Thanks for shedding some light on the situation. Please don't misunderstand me - I'm not criticising Babyface or anyone else on the team...my (our) frustration is with CoinMarketCap (CMC). I am fed up with seeing so many projects listed on CMC that are widely recognised to be scams or very suspect at best. Galilel really seems to be stuck in limbo - a classic 'chicken and egg' situation - we need more volume but without a listing on CMC reaching the requisite volume (whatever figure that may be) on a consistent basis is going to be difficult. Out of interest, can you please explain how volume can be faked? If I were to buy say 0.1BTC of $GALI and then on the same day sell it back to myself for less than I paid for it, obviously I would be taking a hit financially but it would get the volume up - surely that scenario wouldn't be classed as fake volume given that a genuine buy and sell has taken place? If a number of people did this then the daily volume could soon hit some respectable figures. The downside is that in a short space of time we could all have wasted our funds! Presumably there are sophisticated ways of doing this using bots that might help minimise your losses or even make some profits in the process? What is your (Galilel's) stance on this process from an ethical/moral standpoint? I must admit that I'm swaying towards 'if you can't beat them, join them'. We're a legitimate project with great prospects but are 'waiting in the wings' whilst the rest of the crypto show continues! You gave the explanation yourself. You can see it in a lot of coins that it is a bot which does it. Galilel will not engage in such practices or pay third parties to do it. First it is illegal. Second we believe not everybody is stupid. I think this dissuades people who are genuinely interested in the project longterm when they see that the team engages in such tactics or doesn't condemn them just for short term success. Faking volume just to convey people a sense of safety is pure deception and imho reflects very poorly on the project itself. And when you arrive at this point it's not about CMC anymore but rather if this is a project that can be trusted. Besides that like I said it is illegal to do it. |
|
|
|
OK so I may be accused of impatience, but I've no doubt we're all still wondering when (if ever!) Galilel will get listed on CoinMarketCap? I think it must be several weeks now since it came to light that CMC had apparently overlooked the fact that Babyface sent answers to all their questions months ago, yet we haven't heard another word from them. One thing that concerns me slightly (and I would be grateful if someone from the team could provide an answer to this) is that this morning, when doing a bit of research into other cryptos, I read somewhere that to be listed on CMC they require your token to have a minimum trading volume of USD$5k per day. If that is the case then that may explain why we have yet to get listed - alternatively what I read could simply be inaccurate and misleading. Anybody? There is a volume requirement. However CMC itself doesn't put a specific number on it. All they say is they don't consider fake volume to count against it (which by my assessment can not be true, since plenty of projects with obvious insane fake volume get listed). Currently it probably comes down to volume which we have no influence on. Sadly everytime we submit the requested information we get a copy/paste reply that someone from CMC will look into it and come back to us. As you might guess it's not possible for us to ask what they specifically think is missing so it's all a guessing game for us too. However seeing that they list forked projects with no inhouse developer at all we guess it is volume. I understand that people get impatient. Unfortunately remaining patient is all we can do since we simply have no control over the process. Also keep in mind that CMC doesn't just request simple one liner's with regard to information. By now Babyface submitted several times new information on their request which takes a good amount of time. So on his end this process is also connected to a lot of work |
|
|
|
A project that has good deliverables.
Proof of stakes now seem to be the order of the day for lots of promising projects on blockchain.
My question is, when do you intend listing on global exchanges?
Be sure to immediately be on the major exchanges? Can you imagine what volumes are needed? and if something goes wrong with the stock exchange, I think the project itself is important, and it will take its price. Volume is definitely one aspect to consider. There are also other aspects that factor into wether to list on major exchanges. Gali is not there yet. The big exchanges require a lot of legal documents amongst other things. Also listing fees can be exorbitant and not only that, some also require ongoing maintenance costs. At this stage it would be not wise to list on the big ones besides the fact that it would simply not be possible. Currently the overall focus lies on development as can be seen on the regulary pushed github commits. However we still list on exchanges when the opportunity arises. Yesterday Gali got listed at Amsterdex which is a recently rebranded exchange located in the Netherlands that requires no id verification which adds another layer to the currently available exchanges. |
|
|
|
I'm really excited to see the progress of the Android wallet development being shared in the discord - little teasers here and there! What I really can't wait for though is development of the iOS wallet! That said, having had iPhones for many years I am now seriously considering jumping ship and perhaps going down the Pixel phone route. It seems that all crypto projects focus on Android initially and in this respect Galilel is no different.
Perhaps somebody here could explain to me the pros and cons of the GALI desktop wallet versus the soon to be released GALI mobile wallet. I appreciate that it is still in development and so there is no telling what the functionality will be, but as a general rule, what limitations should one expect and security risks should one consider with mobile wallets compared with desktop wallets?
First of all there won't be an iOS wallet for now. The app store is more restrictive with regard to crypto currency wallets. You need to register/incorporate as an organisation in order to upload a crypto wallet to the app store. That's the main reason why most coins only offer android mobile wallets if at all. The advantage of a mobile wallet is that those wallets are online 24/7 since mobile phones usually are never turned off. This increases the network weight. They are also less resource intensive since they utilize a light node. |
|
|
|
Hi All, It's that time again! Could you please update your wallets at your earliest convenience with version 1.1.1 located at https://github.com/MasternodeFoundation/MANOcoin/releases/tag/1.1.1. We have updated a number of backend items that have been identified since the last release. Remember to take a backup of your wallet file and store this in a safe location (if you haven't done so already) prior to updating. working discord link? Hi tokenZ, I have updated on the Bitcointalk announcement now. The new invite is https://discord.gg/WquZdW . Thanks for bringing this to our attention. Myself and a few other team members have taken over the reigns of Mano a couple of weeks ago, and we have been working through things to get us back up and running again ASAP. Hope to see you in the discord! The link is not working. You might wanna post a new one. maybe one that doesn't expire maybe also to mno |
|
|
|
Thanks for keeping us up-to-date. Good to see that the Gali devs are worth their salt. This is what really seperates this project from most other mn coins and what they call "devs" |
|
|
|
|
Yeah the bootstrap can be pretty time saving:-)
|
|
|
|
I'm still looking for a Klingon translation. A couple of people wrote me if there are other translation bounties available. Here's a list. Please remember that I'm not responsible for those and you have to check out the discord and communicate with the dev when claiming those. https://discord.gg/wWQx9AGArabic Chinese Croatian - DONE Czech Dutch - DONE Filipino French German - DONE Hungarian Indian Indonesian - DONE Italian - reserved Japanese Korean Polish Portuguese Romanian Russian - DONE Slovak Spanish - reserved Turkish Ukraine Vietnamese - DONE |
|
|
|
|
