As uBlock.it has grown, we have continued to command a very large percentage of network hashrate, and we thank all users that have been loyal customers over the years and mining at uBlock.it

Moving forward uBlock.it will begin charging a 2% fee to hopefully incentivize users to either, move to solo mining, or to join xpoolx.(or even create a competing pool)

We will periodically assess the situation and adjust fees accordingly to ensure that uBlock.it does not command over 51% hashrate for any extended period.
Happy mining  

Hello,
Could you please add Riecoin to your site?
Algorithm is primesr and is CPU mine-able only

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=446703.0

http://riecoin.org/

https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/riecoin

Pools (both are 0% fee PPLNS)

https://ublock.it/

https://xpoolx.com/ricindex.php

The coins are not duplicated, the explorer is in error by interpreting the dummy output in addition to the correct block.
The block numbers are the same, there is only one block, not two.

There is nothing wrong with RLGz address, that's a miner.

I think these are coins that were abandoned from disabled Poloniex users who did not complete KYC before the deadline. IMHO they are as good as burnt coins. Some people speculate Circle/Goldman sachs could dump them in the future all at once, but that would be illegal so it's very unlikely.

Perhaps there is an issue with your configuration.
There is no issue with the softfork, as other miners are mining successfully using satoshi 0.16.3.1.
You're welcome to mine on uBlock.it or XpoolX, they are both 0% fee currently (ublock better if located in north america xpoolx better if located near EU)

Post a sample of your config for riecoin.conf and rieMiner.conf omitting any confidential details of course, and maybe someone can help you.

Yes I believe there is a 32 bit binary as well.

The miner built into the wallet is not worth using anyway, it's quite slow.

you can use rieMiner for solo mining, or join a pool.

https://github.com/Pttn/rieMiner

If you're the user I think you are on ublock, you're on track to earn around 360-450/day.

The RIC/day estimation on most pools is orders of magnitude lower than what you will actually earn.

There's really no accurate way to measure hashrate in Riecoin.

My best advice is to look at share rate to determine you're actual mining power, after mining for a few days, you should be able to determine an average coins/day and it should be much higher than the pool estimations.

uBlock.it has completed a server migration to new hardware. Our apologies for the short downtime we had to endure.
The new platform is much more scalable and will allow for more stable pool operation as well as easier upgrades in the future.

uBlock.it has also incorporated the upgrade to 0.16.3 as part of our migration and is now signaling for CSV/segiwt activation!

If you're a miner and your pool doesn't support the new rule-set, consider switching to a pool that does if you want to see the network upgraded.
happy mining

I agree, it's easier to just follow the core code than try and change something like segwit.
The current software defaults to zero fee tx if 6 inputs or less, this will change after everyone is upgraded and there will be no zero-fee default.

I'm fine with this, miners can choose to mine 0 fee tx if they want. My beef with segiwt was supposing we keep 0 fee tx, it would make no sense to allow 0 fee segwit tx as they require more space but this is a moot point as it is up to the miners which tx to include (as it should be)

uBlock.it will upgrade it's nodes to this RC as soon as possible.
My only worry is that "All Others" miner goes along with the upgrade as well, since they do not publicly discuss anything we'll have to keep a close eye on if/when they signal support.

We need to set an activation time for some of these BIP's, that appears to be the only thing causing delay on the node upgrade.
Personally I don't care if we activate any of them.
 
Only BIP that may be worth activating is BIP 65 for CLTV, but I still don't understand how that's better than nLockTime. If it's required for certain DEX then I will support it.
Currently I see no reason to activate segwit though.

I recently compiled Gapcoin but have some issues syncing. Node was stuck on block from 2014, i have restarted sync only connecting to one node to see if that works. Unfortunately syncing to only one node will be very slow . . .

Anything I'm missing, or is there a download available of the blockchain to speed things up?

Edit: looks like it passed the problem block.

Based on what i'm reading it seems the community doesn't want a pool. It would appear to me that having some reliable pools could definitely help increase difficulty.
I may consider adding one if there is sufficient interest.

Has anyone else experienced issues with withdraws on zapple? I have not received any emails from zapple to confirm withdraws.
Edit: it's working, false alarm.

The reasons I think segwit is unnecessary for Riecoin.
1) The blockahin is heavier (transactions require more space)
2) The fee is smaller only for some kind of tx
3) Riecoin traditionally had zero fees for transactions with fewer than 7 inputs(not positive on this number off the top of my head but zero fee is default for small size tx)
4) Since segwit tx get discounted fees by weight and Riecoin still wants 0 fee tx, it only makes sense to change this and make segwit tx more expensive since it requires more space. (this would require change to current Core implementation if segwit is adopted)

Given these points I still see how it's valuable to follow BTC code because it's easiest to merge future updates etc (probably why 99% of altcoins blindly follow it exclusively)
FWIW I really don't care if we continue with following Bitcoin Core at the end of the day these issues are very minor since the chain is not likely to see high use such as the bitcoin chain.

I personally like what Bitcoin Unlimited is doing, primarily with graphene and other improvements to help block propagation, further reduce orphan rates. But I'm not married to that solution, just decided to play around with the idea.

Hopefully that answers your question. I don't intend to have a huge debate about it, but I think the fee situation should at least be given special attention, unless of course everyone is fine with ditching 0 fee tx.

uBlock.it will upgrade to 0.16.3 as soon as it's approved by gatra and is available on the official github. I have started testing it and may mine a few blocks on main net but the pool will remain on 10.2 for the time being.

Imo I wish we would have ditched segwit. It's completely unnecessary for Riecoin. But we're already almost complete with 16.3 so it is what it is.  

For fun, I am working on a Bitcoin Unlimited fork of riecoin with no segwit, it will take some time as i'm not very experienced with c++  so don't expect release anytime soon (or ever) but if you see it on the testnet you'll know. we'll see how it goes.  

It's best to align instances and threads to each NUMA node from my experience.

Registrations reopened at uBlock.it

https://ublock.it/index.php?page=register

uBlock.it is a private pool.

Give us a try and see why uBlock is the most profitable Riecoin Pool!

If you find that registrations have been closed please send a PM for invite information.
-Happy mining

Hello, all the discord invite links seem to be expired. Can someone provide a valid invite please?

Might pick up some RIC, was de-listed from Poloniex and several people panic sold down to 50 sats. New software developments are happening with new core release soon. Also some other community members will likely list this coin somewhere with more liquidity in the near future.

It's currently traded on https://zapple.com/ which unfortunately is not on coinmarketcap at the moment.

Coin is very under the radar, it's worth a gamble imo.