yes, I thought it is obvious
I made a bitter joke
ok, tread is useless, no good new info here
|
|
|
my main complaint is on people, they accept too much shafting, actually it is like they demand that treatment, don't know why...
it is part of the global feminisation
people give away power and than go submissive, begging for what belongs to them
and as for paypal, it amazes me, how they didn't get punished already, by mass exodus darwin is beating around the bush with this one
how come bully never looses a tooth ?
|
|
|
one feature that average joe obviously likes is what paypal provides, so why not have it in bitcoin wallet ?
here it is
random blocking of coins, chance to get blocked from spending incrases with amount of coins in wallet, funds unlocked after random number of "mails" sent somewhere or default release after 180 days
people would love it, and awareness of bitcoin would rise, there would be many headlines and threads everywhere, news coverage about coins blocked, unusable for long time, moar hodl less panic selling etc...
people would get more emotionally engaged
not to mention, security would improve, since some hackers would have to wait
win-win situation
|
|
|
really nobody wants a cascasius error coin ?
|
|
|
the reason for bigger price with escrow included is simple,
statistically, more people involved, more chance for troubles, person acting as escrow hit by buss is an example, that is the only reason not to discourage escrow
|
|
|
lets go, people
|
|
|
3 btc if no escrow, buyer sends first, it is very risky, but I'm a good guy if escrow, than price must be 3.2 btc + escrow fee sending internationally, with signature request on delivery
|
|
|
I have to call him a scammer, he is a good one, watch out, smooth operator, gathered some bitcoin for poker tournament staking, he actually gave me some poker coaching cheaply, to build trust, I assume I got carried away buy his poorness, he only suggested, not asked for speciffically, and I sent him 1 btc to help him earn playing poker, I even said to keep 90% of the winnings, so he can take off faster he just stopped responding, has been active since, first he had the long vacation, than the hard disc with my btc on it has crashed people, keep all for yourself, even mercy, not only your coins
|
|
|
Hashes are computed using the block header as input. Elements of the block header depend on many things, including the transactions included in the block. In the block header there is some free space that can be filled with any value (the so-called nonce). The goal of the miner is to create a block header in such a way that its hash falls below a certain target value. So while the hash of a blockheader of an altcoin may fall below the target of the bitcoin blockchain, the block that this hash was computed from will not be a valid Bitcoin block, because the difficulty value embedded in its header will be different and the transactions included in the block will be invalid on the Bitcoin network.
ok, now it is much clearer hash is proof of work, but cant be submitted as the actual work, work is the block produced, altcoin miner must be actually mining bitcoin to be able to use finding on bitcoin
|
|
|
I am talking about actual numbers that are a block hash,
can they be reused, that hash, to mess with with bitcoin blockchain ?
for eample, some altcoin miner finds new block and that 000000000000000023494920420402 hash actually fits the current bitcoin blockchain requirement, and uses it to "hurt" bitcoin in some way
I hope I now clarified my question
|
|
|
are they, or their hashes, usable in bitcoin blockchain,
is that danger to bitcoin blockchain in any way ?
|
|
|
nevermind, if anyone is still looking here, I capitulated on this matter
|
|
|
I've never tried this with namecoin. It probably should work the same way, but I've never looked at the source or anything else.
Just to be clear, is the key for the transaction being redeemed in your wallet?
yes, regular namecoin qt wallet, latest this is a simple test, no multisig, just signing from offline, where my private key is, I created a transaction (request) online, same qt version, same wallet in it
|
|
|
I am still stuck, people help, please, I am sooo close now signrawtransaction 010000000141cb7e0d93ec45235112a14417881d7a18b338ba9b127882158e3a03d6be252100000 00000ffffffff018066ab13000000001976a9143b5b3007d7dd2cdeaba2542b6a2effa33cc13f81 88ac00000000 '[{"txid":"2125bed6033a8e158278129bba38b3187a1d881744a112512345ec930d7ecb41","vout":0,"scriptPubKey": "76a9143b5b3007d7dd2cdeaba2542b6a2effa33cc13f8188ac"}]' this is my best bet now, it returns that same hash parameter and description -- "complete" :false when I execute only short version signrawtransaction 010000000141cb7e0d93ec45235112a14417881d7a18b338ba9b127882158e3a03d6be252100000 00000ffffffff018066ab13000000001976a9143b5b3007d7dd2cdeaba2542b6a2effa33cc13f81 88ac00000000 same thing happens, I have the same version of qt online and offline, and that is the latest available wallet was encrypted in standard qt interface and I unlock it with walletpassphrase before I execute those above instructions any ideas ? my goal is to spend from a cold storage, so if any of you people have a solution other than doing raw transactions, please speak now, or forever hold your peace
|
|
|
The scriptPubKey is the public key of address, you can use validateaddress to get it.
ok, I have this scryptpubkey, got it with decoderawtransaction 010000000141cb7e0d93ec45235112a14417881d7a18b338ba9b127882158e3a03d6be252100000 00000ffffffff018066ab13000000001976a9143b5b3007d7dd2cdeaba2542b6a2effa33cc13f81 88ac00000000 and now, when i enter this signrawtransaction 010000000141cb7e0d93ec45235112a14417881d7a18b338ba9b127882158e3a03d6be252100000 00000ffffffff018066ab13000000001976a9143b5b3007d7dd2cdeaba2542b6a2effa33cc13f81 88ac00000000 '[{"txid":"2125bed6033a8e158278129bba38b3187a1d881744a112512345ec930d7ecb41","vout":0, "scriptPubKey":"76a9143b5b3007d7dd2cdeaba2542b6a2effa33cc13f8188ac" }]' '[abc123]' I get error: value is type int, expected array, I am entering password in a format as I would enter it through keyboard if password is abc123, I am entering directly abc123 as parameter
|
|
|
thank you it works I get this: 010000000141cb7e0d93ec45235112a14417881d7a18b338ba9b127882158e3a03d6be252100000 00000ffffffff018066ab13000000001976a9143b5b3007d7dd2cdeaba2542b6a2effa33cc13f81 88ac00000000 now, if my password is abc123 signrawtransaction 010000000141cb7e0d93ec45235112a14417881d7a18b338ba9b127882158e3a03d6be252100000 00000ffffffff018066ab13000000001976a9143b5b3007d7dd2cdeaba2542b6a2effa33cc13f81 88ac00000000 '[{"txid":"2125bed6033a8e158278129bba38b3187a1d881744a112512345ec930d7ecb41","vout":0, "scriptPubKey": }]' '[abc123]' is that even correct ? and I don't know where to find that scriptPubKey value, tried on block explorer and in my transaction description, but no such number
|
|
|
I guess I am doing only some syntax error trying to execute this in qt console : createrawtransaction '[{"txid":"2125bed6033a8e158278129bba38b3187a1d881744a112512345ec930d7ecb41","vout":0}]' '{"N1zDJnuNdBFXxF17JmmJFjLAM1t5PTbKoC":3.3}' than this : createrawtransaction '[{2125bed6033a8e158278129bba38b3187a1d881744a112512345ec930d7ecb41,0}]' '{N1zDJnuNdBFXxF17JmmJFjLAM1t5PTbKoC:3.3}' none of those combinations works, all I get is error parsing JSON I have more than 3.3 nmc in wallet, but they are currently young, just landed in my intention is to send them out by creating transaction online than signing it offline with signrawtransaction can someone teach me this thanx
|
|
|
|