Aurumconnect?
![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
Haha Great, you put a smile on my face
![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
Only time will tell.
![Cool](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cool.gif)
Did you ever apply for licensing for gold?
Also have you found any sort of audit system to handle any requests in the last 5 years that you have been working on this coin?
I think those guys are just trolls, but I want to seriously ask you this. That's why I mentioned that this coin is shady in that aspect.
It's easy to make a "gold-equivalent" coin, take for example I make a coin called "Neloc75 coin". I fork bitcoin from a repo, reduce the supply, maybe change the blocktime add some random tweaks and make it "flashy", it will still just be bitcoin but with some tweaks and no different than the other endless bitcoin clones out there. But if I take steps to add bullion and other precious metals to support my hypothetical coin, then I can say that it is backed by such and such. It takes a few years to get government approval depending on your jurisdiction in the world, but it's important. The same can be said about having an audit for such. You need some way that people can see that it is equal to such and such, perhaps through a 3rd party auditing partner.
TLDR : Aurumcoin is just a bitcoin clone as it stands, unless steps have been taken to successfully add bullion to support this coin. The original creator abandoned this coin, so that may play a factor in KYC requirements for precious medals as well, but idk.