it has certainly worked for me before, but just like you said, its "grinding to a halt". is it because buggy so my payment is not coming thru? if so, how/who do i even complain to? Well... Apparently Alex Beckenham supported it at one point, but no longer does. See here.. http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=6526.msg147714#msg147714
|
|
|
I can't even play and lose my bitcoins... It is saying my address is not valid.
I'd say their bitcoin daemon died on the server. All transactions should be queued and process when/if it comes back up.
|
|
|
i have 8 connections and 131392 blocks. I used them before and received from them, sometimes very fast, only after 2 confirmations, and recently it takes much longer, and now it feels as if they just take your bitcoin away and not pay even tho you have won. i didnt put too much in just in case its a scam, i only put in like 0.1BTC in to check, but its not very good I'm in a gambling mood. I'll play and report back. Edit: Hmm.. there website is grinding to a halt. That could certainly be an issue.
|
|
|
Your payout address is correct? You have the full block chain downloaded in your client?
In your bitcoin client the bottom line should read X connections (where X is greater than 0) 131392 blocks (at this exact moment) Y transactions (for however many transactions you have sent/received)
If your connections is 0 or your blocks are < the current block count, you won't see the transaction yet.
If you have 0 connections try starting it with
bitcoind.exe -addnode 64.22.103.150 -addnode 69.164.218.197 -addnode 178.79.147.99
|
|
|
OSD doesn't display over VNC only. Displays fine on actual screen. I have absolutely no idea. The machine is sitting right next to me. I look at the monitor, OSD stats are there, look at the VNC viewer on my laptop, no OSD stats appear.
Was working on 1.41, gone now in 1.6
I haven't tried any version in between.
|
|
|
Haven't gotten mine yet, hopefully tomorrow or Monday
Lol, oh wait, there it is, stuck between the Cable and Cell Phone bill.
Sweet! 50 Trillion Dollars!
|
|
|
I have a pet theory that the Anon/LulzSec folks are hard at work screwing bitcoiners over...all for lulz no doubt! Wow, you didn't jump off a bridge? Fuck LulzSec, seriously. They accomplish absolutely nothing except screwing over normal people. I hope they all die a slow painful death.
|
|
|
IP address [?]: 65.183.151.13 [Whois] [Reverse IP] IP country code: US IP address country: ip address flag United States IP address state: Vermont IP address city: Burlington IP postcode: 05401 IP address latitude: 44.4929 IP address longitude: -73.2253 ISP of this IP [?]: Burlington Telecom Organization: Burlington Telecom Host of this IP: [?]: saito.countshockula.com Contact their abuse department with the information and time your email was accessed. My guess though is that this is a compromised account and the thief is not the persons associated with that IP at the time of the attack. Edit: There is a website running at http://65.183.151.13/Also responding on port 22 for SSH Lol.. 111 is responding as well.. He's not that bright.
|
|
|
So if it says it's gone, it's really gone and I can't do anything.. correct?
This is correct
|
|
|
Buy orders working fine for me
|
|
|
I'm having a problem with the .conf file. Is there a special way it needs to be created? the way I was doing it was with a text document named bitoin.conf and I'd put a user name and pass in it yet it still doesn't work. Namecoind closes automatically by itself still and if I run namecoind commands in CMD I get this error:
error: You must set rpcpassword=<password> in the configuration file: C:/Users/Edit/AppData/Roaming/Namecoin/bitcoin.conf
The file is in the correct place. I must be doing something wrong. Any ideas?
Most likely the file is having .txt appended to it by notepad. How to check. Open a command prompt type move C:/Users/Edit/AppData/Roaming/Namecoin/bitcoin.conf.txt C:/Users/Edit/AppData/Roaming/Namecoin/bitcoin.conf Try to start bitcoind again
|
|
|
lower it to 700. click apply. close and open msi afterburner. lower to 350. click apply. close and open msi afterburner. lower to 300. mine
If you set it to 600MHz first time, you can hit 300MHz second time. I have yet to have any of my cards freeze at 600MHz.
|
|
|
Just don't enable crossfire and you should be fine.
|
|
|
What's the diff between this one and the $109 version?
Nothing. It's the exact same card that was on sale for $109 earlier this week, Newegg just saw a quick buck and jumped on it. If I were them I would have put them up at $179.
|
|
|
I wonder if overclocking is a bad deal if you have expensive power?
At the moment, no. 5850 Stock 725MHz, 151 Watts, 264MH/sec OCed 960MHz, 201 Watts, 375MH/sec (memory underclocked) Assume ridiculously expenisve power. $.50 per KWh At current difficulty and exchange rate Overclocked will earn you $5.76 per day after power costs Stock will earn you $3.94 per day after power costs
|
|
|
So I know I said we were going to choose the name, but I didn't expect it to be so hard to choose. So, I've posted a poll on this thread for you to vote for your favorite name. I'll leave it up until tomorrow night.
BlowMe wasn't included? Inconceivable!
|
|
|
It's not safe, but it can be done.
Short a Green and Black wire on the 20/24 pin ATX connector using a paperclip shaped like a U. Hook up graphics card. Try to figure out the exact timing of turning everything on. It needs to be near simultaneous, but not quite. Basically a few milliseconds after the main PSU starts the dedicated one needs to be switched on.
Although not all PSUs will power on like this, some need a constant draw device like a case fan hooked up to a molex connector.
That's no problem since I have an ATX 24-pin splitter that turns on both PSUs simultaneously. What I'm wondering is whether it creates some sort of power differential having the motherboard on one PSU and a connected Graphicscard on another. It's fine. I've done it the way I described successfully once, so a splitter should make it easy mode. They make special supplemental PSUs for graphics cards that fit in 5.25 bays, I'd assume the work on the same principle.
|
|
|
|