That is a mixer. Am trying to run the program now.
ok feed it these values: Block Height: 11237 Exact Amount: 1.9998 What wallet address did these coins originally come from? That's a mixer and not the sender address, right? KHnWwPymSu15rk3FMwwZWVuCvnZeYPomjS |
|
|
|
You seem to have plenty of time to spend replying here and speaking with malice against our technology but no time to back up your statements. We want to work for you, give us the information we need to take care of it, or stop fudding. Were running our own tests as we speak, we will be documenting them.
Why don't you do the right thing and hire some competent mathematicians/cryptographers to prove (or disprove) that your anonymity method actually works? You could also publish the results in some respected scientific journal. This will give boost to the credibility of this coin. You seem like such a good Samaritan, maybe you could lend the cash to do so! Well, if the pumpers can afford to hire 22 people, then hiring one additional expert shouldn't be such problem for them. |
|
|
|
We want to know your findings, in the event that it's real (it's not) we would even create a solution to resolve it. Were here and ready to make changes as they are needed and we appreciate any input. We don't however appreciate people making negative statements without providing us with enough detail to explain the situation, or put or devs to work on correcting the issue. I regard this as fud until someone can provide us with evidence beyond what we have tested and disproved on our own. You do realize how that looks upon you right? BRB calling Stephen Hawking! We don't need to hire mathematicians to verify our anonymity works, the power in it is in it's simplicity. Please post your "examples" now. We tested extensively and can declare that it's fake. A well crafted piece of fud.
Tomorrow. It is almost 3AM here and I still haven't finished some other (non-crypto related) things. |
|
|
|
You do realize how that looks upon you right? BRB calling Stephen Hawking! We don't need to hire mathematicians to verify our anonymity works, the power in it is in it's simplicity. Please post your "examples" now. We tested extensively and can declare that it's fake. A well crafted piece of fud.
Tomorrow. It is almost 3AM here and I still haven't finished some other (non-crypto related) things. |
|
|
|
BRB calling Stephen Hawking! We don't need to hire mathematicians to verify our anonymity works, the power in it is in it's simplicity. Please post your "examples" now. We tested extensively and can declare that it's fake. A well crafted piece of fud. Were running our own tests as we speak, we will be documenting them.
Why don't you do the right thing and hire some competent mathematicians/cryptographers to prove (or disprove) that your anonymity method actually works? You could also publish the results in some respected scientific journal. This will give boost to the credibility of this coin. |
|
|
|
It doesn't work guys, documentation being drafted now. I hate fudders  |
|
|
|
Were running our own tests as we speak, we will be documenting them. no one has been able to truly verify this. What would you like us to do to show to you guys that it is fud? We have tested this extensively and it's not even close at any time.
Publish rigorous mathematical proof that your anonymity actually works? I will post some examples tomorrow if I will have enough time. I haven't verified them yet. |
|
|
|
|
no one has been able to truly verify this. What would you like us to do to show to you guys that it is fud? We have tested this extensively and it's not even close at any time.
|
|
|
|
hey guys we already tried running it. It's worthless because it requires access to the sending wallet, and it only gets the address of the first mixer.. which anyone can get by looking at their transaction, it however cannot get any of the remaining ones, and they are totally randomized as well. It just doesn't work guys. This is such a blatant attempt by a competing community to get their volume back. It belongs in key and it will stay here  We appreciate you guys doing your homework though. Great community |
|
|
|
You will need to get a VPS server set up, I know a lot of people have created and added nodes on their own. If you are asking if you can operate one of the encrypted messaging servers then no, that option is not currently available to just anyone at this time. No, actually there are over 90 nodes operated by both the devs and the community. It is not a trustless solution, it is a decentralized and distributed network that we plan to improve upon and are making great strides in that direction. how does the node selection work?
Does this system use:
- private nodes that the developers maintain?
-master nodes like Darkcoin?
-every wallet is a node?
Lastly, is this system 100% trustless? the reviewer doesn't mention that in his assessment of Keycoin, or I might have just missed it.
thanks.
qouting my question because its going to get lost in a sea of hype-tards pumping KeyCoin. so how do I become a node? |
|
|
|
No, actually there are over 90 nodes operated by both the devs and the community. It is not a trustless solution, it is a decentralized and distributed network that we plan to improve upon and are making great strides in that direction. how does the node selection work?
Does this system use:
- private nodes that the developers maintain?
-master nodes like Darkcoin?
-every wallet is a node?
Lastly, is this system 100% trustless? the reviewer doesn't mention that in his assessment of Keycoin, or I might have just missed it.
thanks.
qouting my question because its going to get lost in a sea of hype-tards pumping KeyCoin. |
|
|
|
No, i've never even heard of that guy. Nice attempt at fud however. |
|
|
|
liquid, read the thread, mostly look at the dev account posts that should get you started. |
|
|
|
|
There are a total 22 keycoin team members, all operating different departments but working collaboratively. Our keyOS department will be the next to deliver their work. They are a great group of guys and are looking forward to release an anonymous trading environment with auto wallet updaters, spreadsheets designed for trading, and programs used to make various trading based calculations, and more.
|
|
|
|
Another delivered promise! We have several trading tools being integrated in to the keyOS as well. I'll give you guys a few teasers on that soon  |
|
|
|
I am sorry if i have been a bit too forward or unprofessional with my words. I have been attacked, threatened and harassed daily and I suppose i developed a bit of a tone when dealing with that stuff. I will make changes to the way I communicate with you all going forward. Sorry guys  |
|
|
|
|
Kryptofoo,
I will relay that information to the guys that operate those channels.
|
|
|
|
Shitcoins are shitcoins man! We're all about being professional, but were not going to "politically correct" ourselves to the point that we lose our freedom to be expressive either. Thanks for the kind words! we're going to keep kicking ass!Just a simple suggestion:
All curse words should be removed from the official announcements on the website. They are not professional. Anything that sounds like complaining isn't professional either.
In general in this business, public statements should be made with the same care and caution a politician takes. If you wouldn't say "shitcoins" in a State of the Union Address, don't say that in a public statement. Clean it up, and things will appear 100-fold more professional.
The team is professional, and the website looks great. So does the technology. Make the PR equally as great, and this will be a monster. Don't mention fights with others, don't point fingers, and don't do anything that could be perceived as antagonistic, particularly in the PR.
All in all, great job.
Heed these words, and things will go further faster.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the main thing i want to make clear is that most of the statements regarding our anon are complete fabrications by people who are sending anon to a wallet that they already have the address for (it's their own) and pasting the transaction from the sending and receiving address and claiming that they figured it out.
They seem to be unable to wrap their heads around what the encrypted messaging system between nodes actually creates. It creates an anon that if you were to choose a receiving address for a transaction, it would be absolute guess work making it inadmissible to anyone attempting to use it as proof. All the people claiming they figured it out are doing so because they are in fact just cheating by knowing both the sending and receiving addresses and posting the sending and receiving transactions and claiming to know how they got there by injecting some nonsense technical jargon in.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
