|
blockchain.info isn't calculating firstbits for new addresses. Could you fix it please?
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin clones are basically equivalent to Bitcoin. The page doesn't mention the word "dollar" either, but it obviously applies to dollars.
Wow your dumb. Wow, great argument! Welcome to my ignore list. |
|
|
|
After a cursory reading of the ruling, I say I believe it to be excellent news. The ruling itself is pretty bland and overall pretty sensible, and for what is essentially the first utterance of the word "Bitcoin" from the mouth of the US Government, that translates to "excellent" for this community. It is the first hint of their strategy and it seems to be something other than an all-out assault on the peoples' currency.
I don't see the word "Bitcoin" mentioned anywhere in that document "De-Centralized Virtual Currency" -- what else could that possibly refer to? Take your pick: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=67.0It refers to any "De-Centralized Virtual Currency", not Bitcoin exclusively. And as I said makes no mention of the word "Bitcoin" it applies to any virtual currency. Could mean Litcoin, FRC, Ripple, NVC etc... etc... etc.. Bitcoin clones are basically equivalent to Bitcoin. The page doesn't mention the word "dollar" either, but it obviously applies to dollars. |
|
|
|
After a cursory reading of the ruling, I say I believe it to be excellent news. The ruling itself is pretty bland and overall pretty sensible, and for what is essentially the first utterance of the word "Bitcoin" from the mouth of the US Government, that translates to "excellent" for this community. It is the first hint of their strategy and it seems to be something other than an all-out assault on the peoples' currency.
I don't see the word "Bitcoin" mentioned anywhere in that document "De-Centralized Virtual Currency" -- what else could that possibly refer to? |
|
|
|
Due to the recent bug, I heard everyone's recommended to switch back to 0.7. My qt 0.8 client is currently "Synchronizing with the network." I want to help bitcoin and not hinder it - so is continuing to run 0.8 a problem? Should I uninstall it? Or does it not matter unless I'm mining - which I'm not doing?
You should upgrade to 0.8.1 when it comes out. |
|
|
|
|
Hm, looks like the patch blocks every address starting with "1dice". That's not good since someone could generate such an address accidentally. Make it block only the addresses listed on satoshidice.com and I'll consider applying it.
|
|
|
|
This is madness...
Waiting for it.......
THIS IS SPARTABITCOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOIN! We're going parabolic, $60 by tomorrow? |
|
|
|
Did issue begin when the difficulty recently readjusted, perhaps?
Bingo! Seems to me that OP's problems started exactly then. If that is the case then jgarzik's Avalon should also have b0rked, unless the new firmware fixed something. I did not adjust anything recently. For btcguild it is 32. For ozco it is -1 (means dynamic). Network difficulty, not share size. The difficulty changed from 3,651,011 to 4,367,876 at 2013-03-01 17:39:09 UTC. Was that when your Avalons stopped? |
|
|
|
Did issue begin when the difficulty recently readjusted, perhaps?
Bingo! Seems to me that OP's problems started exactly then. If that is the case then jgarzik's Avalon should also have b0rked, unless the new firmware fixed something. |
|
|
|
How about we just use BTC until it's so commonly accepted that ISO just follows along?
+1 |
|
|
|
I know someone with 5 times that amount and he haven't ever posted here.
So, 10,000 coins? Nice! What price did he buy at? |
|
|
|
2013-02-20 - my bitcoin data folder is 13.4GB (6GB for "blocks" subfolder + 172MB chainstate subfolder + 7.07GB for blkindex.dat and blk0001.dat through blk0003.dat)
Windows is lying to you. The block files in blocks\ and its parent directory are hardlinked and should only be counted once. You can delete blk0001.dat through blk0003.dat and blkindex.dat. |
|
|
|
Does 0.8 take up the same amount of disk space as earlier versions?
Yes. Though you can delete blkindex.dat to free up a bit of space. |
|
|
|
|
Are there any differences from RC1?
|
|
|
|
Or use the google authenticator app on an offline computer.
the clock on an offline computer will vary over time, which will make your otp give a bad result. update the time manually if the otp is gives doesn't work. I tried to set 2fa on mtgox use this method via offlline computer (mini winxp on hirens boot usb) and get wrong otp. I had set time and date same in second and get different otps. Online (same comp as mtgox session) generated otp well matched. any advice, what is going wrong? thanks in advance! Wrong time zone on the offline computer? |
|
|
|
ie. each file's number went down by one, and a new file was started even though the previous one (was #3, now #2) didn't get anywhere near to 2GB.
Is that normal?
Yes. The new code creates 128 MB block files, but it will keep the old ones as is. |
|
|
|
|
Upgraded from 0.7.1 on Windows XP - smooth sailing so far. Syncing is now CPU-limited with very little thrashing of the hard drive, nice work!
|
|
|
|
|
0d975f79874c287c1a8b25af5443340b
The address is in my signature.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
