I once had a dream, a dream where us humans were in outer space building a mind. A mind that contained all knowledge and all possibilities. We were building an omnipotent being, a god. Maybe we never came from god, we came to build god. We may just as well succeed . Succeed in making our own god.

GNU libc is not GPL.  It's LGPL.

That sentence is correct! That 'something' is a supreme creator God.

Information cannot exist without being created first.

Since obviously information existed before any physical mind (otherwise we could have actual logical contradictions), the only rational conclusion that can be reached, is that there is an omnipresent, all-powerful, all-knowing God.

Other theories can be formulated, but none of them are rational if they don't make an exception for a supreme being.

I'll come back to this issue at a later date. Once again I said I'm thinking through cbitcoin over the next few weeks. This is one thing I will look at and consider what license is best. So you just have to stay tuned. I do think the GPL has got problems, so yes I will figure this out. The LGPL might not be perfect either, so we will see.

Irrelevant example, comparing apples and oranges.  The Linux kernel is not a library.

Applications do not link directly with the Linux kernel, therefore applications (obviously!) may be any license.

I'm not sure evolution cares about good or bad (you think cookoos are bad?)- a human judgement that parasites are bad is irrelevant (unless it gives you an evolutionary advantage).
Morality and good and evil etc are myths just like religion.
We're all parasites (look at what you had for dinner today)

Guess I should stop playing angel's advocate for them now. 

I guess the machine could produce both of them of amounts based on consumption statistics.

If it bothers you because it happens too often to you and you really prefer cars over the transit, and you believe they are more important than smartphones (using the same rare earths), I imagine the RBE system will have plenty of parameters where people can democratically vote if cars or smartphones are more important to them, and the system will recalculate the production processes.
If you don't agree with what most people vote, maybe you can even move to another city where you'll get more cars because people there vote more in your favor.

even they realized happiness could never actually be attained...

Juste pour "clore le topic", comme bien souvent, le problème ne venait pas d'eux mais de l'acheteur (moi) !
Leur service est hyper pro, et surtout hyper rapide.
Une fois les "instructions" suivies, l'argent est viré en qques minutes.
Le tout donne l'impression d'être vraiment hyper safe, et je ne peux que conseiller ce site aux nouveaux dans l'univers du Bitcoin, qui semblent nombreux.
Et pour avoir checké les tarifs des autres plateformes, la différence de prix semble vraiment anecdotique, même pour des transactions "conséquentes".

I guess the important point and main difference to our current model of economics is that the Zeitgeisters want to eliminate competition, which of course means we'd have a globally computer-controlled planned economy and a giant single point of failure.

I think this is a very important point.

If the society they imagine will be able to produce goods and services more efficiently than our current economies, this will simply translate into lower prices.

Religion is ubiquitous and universal in human culture (in some form for hundreds of thousands of years). Anthropologically that suggests it's a pretty significant component of evolved human behavior.
It's only after the enlightenment that we get any notion of the possibility that it's all nonsense.
The question really isn't one of belief - it must be one of evolution. Religion must have provided a substantial evolutionary advantage otherwise it couldn't have existed at all.

Right, they say abundance is achieved due to automated recycling technologies, which will make people stop being needy and greedy and unnecessarily hoarding food and stuffs. These technologies don't happen today because of profit motives.

Of course, in reality it's not because profit motives are in the way. Such a Venus Project city would be a perfectly valid endeavor also in an market economy. But I guess in reality no entrepreneur is willing to take on the risk to develop and implement these technologies, or entry costs are too high because of some laws (the evil state). Either way, the Zeitgeisters don't describe how to get there either, or are waiting for the big revolution, from what I gather.

For scarce resources, like (maybe flying) cars etc, they advocate a sharing model, so nothing that people who prefer it that way already do today. Of course, the question is unanswered that the scarcity can also be on the time axis. Like, I dunno, tickets for the super bowl final. Still they want to abolish money, and if people use cigs to trade them on the black markets, big brother PJ will jump out of the TV screen and smack them over I guess.

So what if I told you that, this was a big game designed to trick you to believe that you exist and that everyone and everything was in on it.

+1

The Zeitgeist Movement is based on science, super computers, and mathematical algorithms.
It just seems that no one actually KNOWS what that science, super computers, and algorithms are. The terms sound cool, and there are always "people who understand this better than I can and can explain it better," but no one has actually ever met those people either.