|
Why does it take so long till the coin will launch? Why does it takes a month to create a final stake holder list. I'm not impatient, but we as investors, invested a lot of NXT/BTC, I would like to know when this coin will launch... can somebody tell me that please. thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Hey Guys, Im wondering.. Why is the price of NXT doesnt go up, for such a long time now? Everybody say its a real good coin, a lot of people are working on it, but for months around the 7500 satoshi...
|
|
|
|
I am selling my NEM stake for BTC5.
This equates to 0.00000375 BTC per NEM. This is 21 times smaller than the current NXT price.
PM me if you're interested.
How many NEM, 1 stake? And what is the value of 1 NEM atm? Really 375 satoshi? |
|
|
|
|
WHEN is the distribution of the coins? thank you
|
|
|
|
What is the date that we can get our stakes? I;m hungry  |
|
|
|
|
so the IPO will start in 24 hours?
|
|
|
|
Can newbies enter the 2nd stage if their account wasn't created before the eXo announcement?
WizzardTim that's a somewhat worrying question for me... surely it is only the email giveaway that is limited to established bitcointalk members... the rest of the opportunity should be open to anyone, right? I think its also a bit strange, I see a lot of newbies here, that have made just a few posts, it doesn't make that much sense to me. The only thing that would make sense is that the newbies here are suckpoppet accounts. I hope the devs will control this, so the distribution will be fair. |
|
|
|
|
I don't understand how newbies that didnt have any post, make their first post in this thread that they like this coin so much.
Maybe its a good thing eXo, to keep an eye on people that making more accounts to invest a second or third time...
|
|
|
|
|
I dont understand the list. Is it correct that all the people on the right column dont get a stake? Nobody got a Y there...
|
|
|
|
Yes some more colours would be nice.. |
|
|
|
so you receive 1 NXT?  Forging NXT is not gonna bring you a lot of NXT. you Bter buy some |
|
|
|
|
Would be nice if there is someone who could create a logo for eXo...
|
|
|
|
How hard is it to write a bullshit whitepaper ? If i'd try a scam like this ( which i'd never do, to be clear ) I'd make sure to provide as much believable data as possible.
As long as we don't know who these people are, they have NOTHING to lose and so much to gain.
Dude... Just leave this forum men, if you can't say anything else then scam, scam scam. And with saying that, all the people here are aware that if they invest it could turn out bad, or at worst case it's a scam, so you don't have to scream it here all the time. |
|
|
|
Thats my grandpa! But if all 1 billion nxt are distributed and there is no more, can you explain me something about forging NXT? Because what I understood is that you can forge NXT, doing this, you will earn more NXT, but if there are only 1 billion nxt and no more and all of this are already distributed, this means with forging, there will become more NXT, right? Not quite. When you send Nxt to someone, or create an alias, or an arbitrary message, or issue an asset exchange transaction, you must pay a FEE (currently 1Nxt). Those fees are collected when transactions are put into blocks, and all the fees from a block are given to the account that forges the block. New tokens are NOT created -- they are "redistributed" from fees. Bitcoin actually does the same thing: there are small fees for all transactions. Once 2140 arrives and no new Bitcoins are being mined, the only way to "earn" Bitcoins from mining will be from collecting fees. Thanks for explaining. Now I understand. But if Im right, forging NXT, will not give you a lot of NXT.. |
|
|
|
Can somebody tell me what is the total amount of NXT coins? Its almost reached right, I thauhgt it was 1 billion?
Nxt is not a coin. It can not and never has been "mined". There are 1 billion and all of them existed from day one and were distributed to investors. Thats my grandpa! But if all 1 billion nxt are distributed and there is no more, can you explain me something about forging NXT? Because what I understood is that you can forge NXT, doing this, you will earn more NXT, but if there are only 1 billion nxt and no more and all of this are already distributed, this means with forging, there will become more NXT, right? |
|
|
|
|
Can somebody tell me what is the total amount of NXT coins? Its almost reached right, I thauhgt it was 1 billion?
|
|
|
|
|
Does somebody know if the finale stake holder list already is published, so yes, where can I find it and so no, when does it come? The devs said, 22februair... thanks!
|
|
|
|
I agree with the idea to vote on this - the devs should come up with a few options they are happy with and then let the investors decide.
+1 totally agree with this solution. Obviously people who already invested will vote to diminish others potential shares to increase their own.  That is counter-intuitive to a fair distribution. Everything sounds reasonable. My suggestion will be - quit everything except 1 stage investors. It will be honest - really they took a risk. But please do not talk any more about "fair distribution" and such shit. Can be good coin, with successful ipo (it is already an achievement), nothing more nothing less.
Exactly the stupid behavior we should expect when deciding to retroactively change the investment terms. The majority will choose to make changes in their own self interest. Don't claim to be something different than everyone else (specifically Nxt was mentioned) then turn around and do the same thing. NEM has this same problem. Claimed to be egalitarian, but made no effort to actually be egalitarian and had to change the investment terms a million times on-the-fly. I don't understand why no-one can get this right. Seems like it's the part that gets the least thought beforehand, but argued about the most after the fact. Now you have a party with a conflict of interest in doing whats best for the distribution (1st stage early bird investors), and you want them to choose/vote on making modifications to the distribution model? lmao. Go whine somewhere else if u missed the first round investments. I did not miss the first round bud. I do however have a problem with my investment being jaded by the decisions of fools. Go whine somewhere else if you don't like constructive thought. Im not wining. I suggest a fair distribution for 1 and 2 round investments. As I said before, the devs didnt expect this amount of investments. If they did, the distribution was constructed more fair for first and second round investments. But I'm glad there are enough people here agreeing with my thoughts. Voting would be the best in this case, democratic voting is the most fair thing to do in this case. |
|
|
|
I agree with the idea to vote on this - the devs should come up with a few options they are happy with and then let the investors decide.
+1 totally agree with this solution. Obviously people who already invested will vote to diminish others potential shares to increase their own. That is counter-intuitive to a fair distribution. Everything sounds reasonable. My suggestion will be - quit everything except 1 stage investors. It will be honest - really they took a risk. But please do not talk any more about "fair distribution" and such shit. Can be good coin, with successful ipo (it is already an achievement), nothing more nothing less.
Exactly the stupid behavior we should expect when deciding to retroactively change the investment terms. The majority will choose to make changes in their own self interest. Don't claim to be something different than everyone else (specifically Nxt was mentioned) then turn around and do the same thing. NEM has this same problem. Claimed to be egalitarian, but made no effort to actually be egalitarian and had to change the investment terms a million times on-the-fly. I don't understand why no-one can get this right. Seems like it's the part that gets the least thought beforehand, but argued about the most after the fact. Now you have a party with a conflict of interest in doing whats best for the distribution (1st stage early bird investors), and you want them to choose/vote on making modifications to the distribution model? lmao. Go whine somewhere else if u missed the first round investments. |
|
|
|
|
The devs never expected that the IPO first stage would atrract so many investors and BTC. Otherwise they had made another construction for the investors, because of the escrow service of Anon a lot of people felled confident enough to take the risk.
My suggestion is still:
Skip the email give away, skip the superblock, skip the third round, shrink the mining with 20% and add all of this to the first and second round investments. With 170 btc investments, ONLY IN THE FIRST ROUND, and the second round has to come yet, that would be fair against all the investors, because the investors are the ones that are taking the biggest risk here.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
