Average effective : 545 mh/s
yes, on the right miningpool
I'm not related to any project.
Do a test on https://woolypooly.com/
world was a website, myha.sh, whose purpose was actually to provide real infos from poolside datas.
In order to measure the real performance you need the pool and the miner to talk the same language. We added the --xintensity to increase the performance poolside. Did you try --xintensity -1 ? [moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]
|
|
|
Tested 224 for 2 hours.
What was the stale share rate? PPLNS pools doesn't like pool hopping 2hours isn't enough time. you need 24hours++
|
|
|
for me it's very important share / min !
For me the very important part is the payout per day. If changing the pool increase the profit +10% it's a nobrainer..
Are you able to provide a link on how that data is generated?
https://www.miningpoolsprofits.com/how-it-works[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]
|
|
|
Ethermine seems to be making -9.29% ethereum than the best paying pool. (last 7 days) (-7.02% the last 56 days) 07-october-2021:
|
|
|
Etheremine doesn't seem to pay for stales.. 2miners, nanopool, miningpoolhub and alot of other pools does
|
|
|
PING: 50ms DIFFICULTY: 1.00 EPOCH: 445
Too low difficulty for --xintensity 256. (default) try --xintensity 224
Even though they pay for the stales (2%).
You need a pool that pay 100% for the stales / uncle blocks. [moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]
|
|
|
Radeon VII and Rx Vega 56 needs memtweak to run good. https://github.com/Eliovp/amdmemorytweakNVIDIA gtx 1080ti, 1080, titanx need "The pill hashrate enlarger"
1. Is this mining software available on hive OS already?
You can install it as a custom miner. Or wait a few more days for the devs to integrate it.
Some days ago I got a PM on reddit from a farmowner who earned more money now With the Team Black Miner than he did before the London hard fork. But you need to tune, and perhaps change the pool. Any chance you know what pool it is? High difficulty pools that pay for stale shares seems to be the best for this miner. But ppl report good returns by playing with the --xintensity on other pools as well.
2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002] ID BOARD HASHRATE/W HASHRATE AVERAGE SHARES 2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002] GPU0 5500 0.00 H/W 27.78 MH/s 27.77 MH/s 891/0/13 (100.00) 2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002] 0.00 H/W 27.78 MH/s 27.77 MH/s 891/0/13 (100.00) 2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002]
very good performance (-xintensity 24) with nanominer or phoenix just 25.00 MH/s
and 99 MH/s with RTX3080
Thank you!
Thanks, we are working on improving the speed even further on the lastest AMD models. ETA 1-2 weeks. [moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]
|
|
|
you can add more retries and longer timeout:
-t --timeout (Set timeout in seconds. Used for connecting and socket timeout) -r --retries (Set number of retry attempts for connecting to pool)
It's recomended to run the miner in a loop like in the example bat files.
|
|
|
Dualmine vertcoin+zilliqa with the team black miner/spminer
profit 24hours rx580 nitro:
Zilliqa (30MHASH) 0.2613 USD vertcoin (0.58MHASH) $1.32 USD
vertcoin and zilliqa can be mined on:
R9 380 and R 290 4GB
|
|
|
Is there any ETA on getting listed in the Hiveos miner list? I know you can add the miner by creating a custom miner profile but it would be much easier if it's listed.
Task for integration already in progress by the hiveos team. You can ask in the hiveos thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2350786.0v1.11 has already been added in Awesome Miner 8.7.7 beta with relatime statistics on hashrate and stats https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=676942.0
Greetings, I went back to version 1.09 because version 1.11 got me down the RX6800 at 61 Mh / s. and the RX580 at 32 Mh / s.
yes. v1.09 is performing better than 1.11 on amd cards. In the next v1.12 we will restore the performance. (default xintensity) We are working on a new and improved opencl code that will improve performance further on newer AMD cards. ETA around 2 more weeks. [moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]
|
|
|
try
TBMiner --algo ethash --hostname eu.crazypool.org --port 3333 --wallet 0x8a1E0bE188865f239bC9866d08ae62d6Fa2b181D --worker_name DESKTOP-820EGVB --xintensity 1
I am out of ideas. You seem to get the same problem we see on windows 8.1 / older cuda toolkits. This optimized miner is using new features of the latest cuda toolkits, so 11.2 or higher is required. Perhaps you can try to install cuda 11.4 ?
reinstall windows 10?
|
|
|
Some days ago I got a PM on reddit from a farmowner who earned more money now With the Team Black Miner than he did before the London hard fork. But you need to tune, and perhaps change the pool. Each pool has different optimal settings. The xintensity has changed. --xintensity -1 on nvidia is now increasing and decreasing the amount of work sent to the GPU to try to reduce stale shares. This results in an unstable hashrate and clockrate locally in the miner, but added around 10MHASH poolside (175MHASH rig) on pools that don't accept stales.
|
|
|
can you change the folder from
C:\Users\Administrator\Desktop\a\
to a local folder somewhere. The program/your user need write access to the folder.
f.ex c:\tbminer\
|
|
|
no..same result as the old version!
Try to rename the files nvapi64.dll to nvapi64.dll_ and OpenCL.dll ro OpenCL.dll_ In the folder
|
|
|
I need to launch the miner BEFORE overclocking the cards through nvidia-settings. If I overclock before, I get the DAG error :
Sometimes it helps to lower the core and memclock, add a little power and mine with a high --xintensity
fresh install done but no luck here.
Any luck with v1.11? [moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]
|
|
|
How do you determine the amount of power that is sufficient for the xintensity value? If I change the xintensity to 256, should I increase my PL to 75%, or is that overkill?
You need to test it yourself. Tune the rig. Different cards need different tuning. With the right pool and more power --xintensity 512 can give a few more MHASH. If the Dag creation is unstable, you can lower the coreclock and memclock, increase intensity and power and still get a better hashrate. Mine on pools with high difficulty.
found one more bug in 1.11: what happened to 3060 TI? Fixed in v1.12 . The cards on the picture are rtx 3060 ti , non LHR. Not RTX 3060 [moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]
|
|
|
Still seems to generate a lot of stales (same o/c as t-rex which was 0.2% stales). Should I play with the o/c or the xintensity ?
You need to check the stale rate poolside on the web page. The miner indicate 5.2980132% stale which is too high. But with vardiff the stalerate can decrease over time. Mine on a higher difficulty will reduce stales. Mining with a lower xintensity will decrease stales.
|
|
|
|