UniJo
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 60
Merit: 2
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 06, 2021, 09:56:59 AM |
|
Is there any ETA on getting listed in the Hiveos miner list? I know you can add the miner by creating a custom miner profile but it would be much easier if it's listed.
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 06, 2021, 10:31:32 AM Last edit: November 08, 2021, 01:13:31 PM by mprep |
|
Is there any ETA on getting listed in the Hiveos miner list? I know you can add the miner by creating a custom miner profile but it would be much easier if it's listed.
Task for integration already in progress by the hiveos team. You can ask in the hiveos thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2350786.0v1.11 has already been added in Awesome Miner 8.7.7 beta with relatime statistics on hashrate and stats https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=676942.0
Greetings, I went back to version 1.09 because version 1.11 got me down the RX6800 at 61 Mh / s. and the RX580 at 32 Mh / s.
yes. v1.09 is performing better than 1.11 on amd cards. In the next v1.12 we will restore the performance. (default xintensity) We are working on a new and improved opencl code that will improve performance further on newer AMD cards. ETA around 2 more weeks. [moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]
|
|
|
|
ep690d01
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 06, 2021, 11:30:33 AM |
|
Hi,
very nice works devs, this is my stats
2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002] eu1.ethermine.org (ethash) PING: 39ms DIFFICULTY: 1.00 EPOCH: 445 2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002] 2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002] 2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002] ID BOARD TYPE TEMP FAN CORE MEM WATT kW/h COST/h 2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002] GPU0 5500 OpenCL 0/0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00USD 2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002] 0 0.00 0.00USD 2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002] 2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002] ID BOARD HASHRATE/W HASHRATE AVERAGE SHARES 2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002] GPU0 5500 0.00 H/W 27.78 MH/s 27.77 MH/s 891/0/13 (100.00) 2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002] 0.00 H/W 27.78 MH/s 27.77 MH/s 891/0/13 (100.00) 2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002]
very good performance (-xintensity 24) with nanominer or phoenix just 25.00 MH/s
and 99 MH/s with RTX3080
Thank you!
|
|
|
|
sukidesu
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 06, 2021, 02:29:17 PM |
|
I'm joining the previous request not to stop the miner if the internet connection goes off. No other miner does that. And since TBM doesn't run from OC'ed cards (I have to start the miner before OC'ing), this brings some problems to write a script to handle that (not impossible, but just not stopping if the connection is lost would resolve it).
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 06, 2021, 03:16:28 PM |
|
you can add more retries and longer timeout:
-t --timeout (Set timeout in seconds. Used for connecting and socket timeout) -r --retries (Set number of retry attempts for connecting to pool)
It's recomended to run the miner in a loop like in the example bat files.
|
|
|
|
sukidesu
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 06, 2021, 06:18:34 PM |
|
you can add more retries and longer timeout:
-t --timeout (Set timeout in seconds. Used for connecting and socket timeout) -r --retries (Set number of retry attempts for connecting to pool)
It's recomended to run the miner in a loop like in the example bat files.
Yeah but I can't use the .sh files. Again, the miner fails if I overclock my GPUs. I'm forced to OC after starting the miner. Which doesn't make the .sh file easy to write.
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 06, 2021, 06:41:24 PM |
|
Yeah but I can't use the .sh files. Again, the miner fails if I overclock my GPUs. I'm forced to OC after starting the miner. Which doesn't make the .sh file easy to write.
You can add (short options) when you launch the miner f.ex -t 360 -r 20. Or add them into the .conf file timeout 3 minutes, 20 retries. https://github.com/sp-hash/TeamBlackMiner/blob/main/README.md#example-configuration-file
|
|
|
|
sukidesu
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 07, 2021, 12:30:30 AM |
|
Some days ago I got a PM on reddit from a farmowner who earned more money now With the Team Black Miner than he did before the London hard fork. But you need to tune, and perhaps change the pool. Any chance you know what pool it is?
|
|
|
|
HashingTower
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 285
Merit: 11
$CYBERCASH METAVERSE
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 07, 2021, 06:21:47 AM |
|
I have two questions for this miner
1. Is this mining software available on hive OS already? 2. How is the performance with HBM2 memory graphic cards like Radeon VII and Rx Vega 56?
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 07, 2021, 07:25:15 AM Last edit: November 08, 2021, 01:12:36 PM by mprep |
|
Radeon VII and Rx Vega 56 needs memtweak to run good. https://github.com/Eliovp/amdmemorytweakNVIDIA gtx 1080ti, 1080, titanx need "The pill hashrate enlarger"
1. Is this mining software available on hive OS already?
You can install it as a custom miner. Or wait a few more days for the devs to integrate it.
Some days ago I got a PM on reddit from a farmowner who earned more money now With the Team Black Miner than he did before the London hard fork. But you need to tune, and perhaps change the pool. Any chance you know what pool it is? High difficulty pools that pay for stale shares seems to be the best for this miner. But ppl report good returns by playing with the --xintensity on other pools as well.
2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002] ID BOARD HASHRATE/W HASHRATE AVERAGE SHARES 2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002] GPU0 5500 0.00 H/W 27.78 MH/s 27.77 MH/s 891/0/13 (100.00) 2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002] 0.00 H/W 27.78 MH/s 27.77 MH/s 891/0/13 (100.00) 2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002]
very good performance (-xintensity 24) with nanominer or phoenix just 25.00 MH/s
and 99 MH/s with RTX3080
Thank you!
Thanks, we are working on improving the speed even further on the lastest AMD models. ETA 1-2 weeks. [moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]
|
|
|
|
dle378
Copper Member
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 77
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 07, 2021, 02:50:53 PM |
|
Been running TBM v1.11 with xintensity 256 on Ethermine and I am getting great results so far. 868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] us1.ethermine.org (ethash) PING: 50ms DIFFICULTY: 1.00 EPOCH: 445 868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] ID BOARD TYPE TEMP FAN CORE MEM WATT kW/h COST/h 868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] GPU0 3060 Cuda 61/0 70 1320 8117 143 0.14 0.01USD 868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] GPU1 3060 Cuda. 61/0 79 1633 8117 172 0.17 0.01USD 868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] GPU2 3060 Cuda. 65/0 70 1354 8117 143 0.14 0.01USD 868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] GPU3 3060 Cuda. 53/0 79 1651 8117 172 0.17 0.01USD 868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] GPU4 3060 Cuda. 63/0 70 1420 8117 143 0.14 0.01USD 868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] GPU5 3060 Cuda. 59/0 70 1358 8117 143 0.14 0.01USD 868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] 916 0.92 0.07USD 868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] 868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] ID BOARD HASHRATE/W HASHRATE AVERAGE SHARES 868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] GPU0 3060 455.28 kH/W 65.11 MH/s 65.10 MH/s 802/2/0 (99.75) 868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] GPU1 3060 378.53 kH/W 65.11 MH/s 65.11 MH/s 738/1/0 (99.86) 868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] GPU2 3060 454.90 kH/W 65.05 MH/s 65.05 MH/s 769/5/0 (99.35) 868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] GPU3 3060 378.20 kH/W 65.05 MH/s 65.11 MH/s 737/0/0 (100.00) 868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] GPU4 3060 455.06 kH/W 65.07 MH/s 65.06 MH/s 743/0/0 (100.00) 868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] GPU5 3060 455.36 kH/W 65.12 MH/s 65.11 MH/s 754/0/0 (100.00) 868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] 2577.33 kH/W 390.50 MH/s 390.54 MH/s 4543/8/0 (99.82) Please keep up the great work! ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
sukidesu
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 07, 2021, 02:55:08 PM |
|
Tested it on Ethermine for 12 hours each with default intensity (256), rig of NV 30** series. TRex : 563 mh/s TBM : 555 mh/s (reported : 601 mh/s) That's really a huge gap between the reported hashrate and the pool average effective hashrate. Even though they pay for the stales (2%) and there's no invalid block. At this point, just provide the right xintensity and the chosen pool to actually see good results. Because I tested 4 different pools and many different xintensity values, and I still didn't find any way to improve my rentability. Actually quite the opposite. Been running TBM v1.11 with xintensity 256 on Ethermine and I am getting great results so far. 868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] 2577.33 kH/W 390.50 MH/s 390.54 MH/s 4543/8/0 (99.82) Please keep up the great work! ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Is 390 mh/s actually your average effective hashrate on ethermine? Just looking at it on your side doesn't mean it's "great results".
|
|
|
|
dle378
Copper Member
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 77
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 07, 2021, 03:04:45 PM |
|
Tested it on Ethermine for 12 hours each with default intensity (256), rig of NV 30** series. TRex : 563 mh/s TBM : 555 mh/s (reported : 601 mh/s) That's really a huge gap between the reported hashrate and the pool average effective hashrate. Even though they pay for the stales (2%) and there's no invalid block. At this point, just provide the right xintensity and the chosen pool to actually see good results. Because I tested 4 different pools and many different xintensity values, and I still didn't find any way to improve my rentability. Actually quite the opposite. Been running TBM v1.11 with xintensity 256 on Ethermine and I am getting great results so far. 868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] 2577.33 kH/W 390.50 MH/s 390.54 MH/s 4543/8/0 (99.82) Please keep up the great work! ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Is 390 mh/s actually your average effective hashrate on ethermine? Just looking at it on your side doesn't mean it's "great results". Thanks for that insight. Based on your reply, it looks like it may not be "great results" based on the average hashrate reporting on Ethermine? Current: 351.8 MH/s Average: 362.7 MH/s Reported: 390.5 MH/s How close should they be?
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 07, 2021, 03:09:52 PM Last edit: November 08, 2021, 01:13:03 PM by mprep |
|
PING: 50ms DIFFICULTY: 1.00 EPOCH: 445
Too low difficulty for --xintensity 256. (default) try --xintensity 224
Even though they pay for the stales (2%).
You need a pool that pay 100% for the stales / uncle blocks. [moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]
|
|
|
|
sukidesu
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 07, 2021, 03:40:36 PM |
|
Even though they pay for the stales (2%).
You need a pool that pay 100% for the stales / uncle blocks. ethermine pays it all. 2% is just my current stales ratio.
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 07, 2021, 03:44:17 PM |
|
Etheremine doesn't seem to pay for stales.. 2miners, nanopool, miningpoolhub and alot of other pools does
|
|
|
|
dedizonesv2
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 152
Merit: 3
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 07, 2021, 03:47:26 PM |
|
Tested it on Ethermine for 12 hours each with default intensity (256), rig of NV 30** series. TRex : 563 mh/s TBM : 555 mh/s (reported : 601 mh/s) That's really a huge gap between the reported hashrate and the pool average effective hashrate. Even though they pay for the stales (2%) and there's no invalid block. At this point, just provide the right xintensity and the chosen pool to actually see good results. Because I tested 4 different pools and many different xintensity values, and I still didn't find any way to improve my rentability. Actually quite the opposite. Been running TBM v1.11 with xintensity 256 on Ethermine and I am getting great results so far. 868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] 2577.33 kH/W 390.50 MH/s 390.54 MH/s 4543/8/0 (99.82) Please keep up the great work! ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Is 390 mh/s actually your average effective hashrate on ethermine? Just looking at it on your side doesn't mean it's "great results". how many share pls for me it's very important share / min !
|
|
|
|
dle378
Copper Member
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 77
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 07, 2021, 03:50:48 PM |
|
PING: 50ms DIFFICULTY: 1.00 EPOCH: 445
Too low difficulty for --xintensity 256. (default) try --xintensity 224 Just changed xintensity to 224. Should I wait a few hours for the Current/Average Hashrate to adjust properly on Ethermine?
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 07, 2021, 03:55:08 PM |
|
Ethermine seems to be making -9.29% ethereum than the best paying pool. (last 7 days) (-7.02% the last 56 days) 07-october-2021: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ibb.co%2F5jm8XVZ%2Fmining-pools.png&t=665&c=1cO_YHqDUahfGA)
|
|
|
|
dle378
Copper Member
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 77
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 07, 2021, 04:05:01 PM |
|
Ethermine seems to be making -9.29% ethereum than the best paying pool. (last 7 days) (-7.02% the last 56 days) 07-october-2021: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ibb.co%2F5jm8XVZ%2Fmining-pools.png&t=665&c=1cO_YHqDUahfGA) Are you able to provide a link on how that data is generated?
|
|
|
|
|