I checked their website and there is no info thus the post on the thread. I don't use telegram cos i still have a flip phone. Never saw the need or secured enough with a smartphone. Anyway, there have been several other announcement on the thread, so it befitting that it will be announced here too.

The platform has to prove it's usefulness, reliability, security etc before any biz will feel comfortable routing their customer's payment info thru the platform. Earning such trust in the crypto space is not an easy feat. That's why i say it will take yrs of proving it's viability before we can start discussing partnerships.

Anyone know when they intend to show a demo? so we get an idea of what we all praising over here.

They have made it known that they intend to invest in spain and way down the line expand to other countries. So the speculation on the market they intend to pursue has already been answered.

Banks might not utilize paypie for all service earlier on but they can immediately benefit from some of it's services esp when dealing with credit assessment.

I have heard several ppl say that you always get a better deal buying a used car than purchasing new. As a young company, it's ideal not to muddle thru the paperwork/cost involved in a building project.

Ok guys lets come back down to reality. No one is partnering with alibaba, ebay, disney or whomever else you can pull of the air yet. the main thing is producing a working platform and after several yrs of proving their viability. maybe  one of the aforementioned co might mention their name in one of the corporate meetings

Have they mentioned when it will be possibly to test the proposed bots.

Real don't intend on building houses, rather they will purchase built houses and even if they choose to purchase hotel/student housings, that would be ideal cos a hotel in the right area will always have guest and student housing is a constant heavy earner

Exactly. Banks earn most of their money of interest on loans. So any service that provides a transparent picture of a client's liquidity/liabities will be valued.

So pretty much the same way i can take current tokens/coins to any participating exchange, sell it and take the money to buy a different token/coin?
Why don't you just have an ICO for a new exchange? and pursue that angle.
 The whole we part of a long list of companies that issues tokens but didn't really tweak any codes related to the aforementioned service has already been used up and won't be viable for long.

No one has yet given me a concise answer on why everyone is elated about an ico for a platform that just releases token. Esp when companies can release their own token. The aforementioned platform is not built from a new code or represent an improvement on an existing code. Its just a middle man token provider.
 Everyone here is shilling loyalty points and airdrop on the platform, off the top of my head i say embermine provides the same thing lest the exchange. Embermine has several
airdrops occurring in the next few weeks and it's still struggling to gain a foot hold in the market b/c  the service been offered which be obsolete in a short time.

 No company is going to want to form a partnership and make a lifetime payment, for a service they can create themselves in less than 30mins. That's just a fact. No matter how much you guys might sugarcoat it, the idea is nothing new to the space.  There are several companies already offering this services and every one of them is doing poorly in the market.
 
 If a company wants a coin, they could easily create a coin on wallet builder or on several other services that offer this and have it listed in an exchange in a few days. Companies can also create a wave token and have it on wave dex immediately or erc 20 and have it on delta immediately. With implementation of the new protocol, the transaction will really speed up. so even if Gatcoin gain better traction than the troves of companies offering similar ideas, the idea will be obsolete in a few months to a yr. Solidarity might be in infancy but if I a non technical observer can create erc token. am quite sure a company with interest in blockchain can easily figure it out.
 So I know it's on a lot of ppl interest to shill without reserve but I won't let you lie to unaware investor and make it seem like this is a groundbreaking idea, cos you are basically leading them to a trap, that I think, will end up costing long term holders dearly. If someone wants to take chance and  pnd the ico, that I can understand but this idea is nothing new, it's already been offered by a lot of companies, and is almost obsolete cos the mass is becoming better aware of the blockchain tech.

 This is akin to buying a new telly, then investing into a robotic model whose  job is to ONLY control the remote, cos you haven't figured out how to do it yourself. How long do you anticipate a need for that robot?

Am not surprised that Anthony joined PAYPIE. I been saying that PAYPIE is one of the few ICO am comfortable with as of late. I will still suggest that an investor do a diligent research before investing but personally i think this is one of the most legit ICO that's currently out there.

having your token of Gat's platform doesn't give you automatic liquidity, your coin has to go thru the same process as any other coin. it takes a decision to buy from investors to gsin liquidity. so there no difference btw me creating an erc 20 and lisiting it on nova exhange and me having the same token under gat's platform. only difference is gat's token is not an erc 20 token, anf it's listed on there exchange, but you pay them for it. So basically, it's no different than wallet builder incorporating an exchange into their platform and deciding to have an ico, cos its basically the same thing

you just agreeing with each other without answering my question. Why would a store pay to utilize GATCOIN when they can provide the same service and save alot of money by creating their own erc-220  token. Also, there is already several companies offering an identical service.

of the top of my mind. i say embermine and there are several more if i really think about it.

So basically Gatcoin is an exchange utilizing erc token to get of the floor and all they basically offer is a wallet and token. Also, don't sell me the line about ED been the only easy exchange to get into. We all receive several free airdrops that is trading on several platforms. So why will a well known company decide to pay to commission Gatcoin to release their token. Again ERC 20 tokens are very easy to create. Let say 1 or 2 companies bite cos solidarity comprehension is at an infantile stage. anyway, how do they keep Gatcoin viable a yr down the line, when this things cease been an issue.

Again, most companies might not be blockchain savvy yet but a quick Google search on creating ERC token will show the steps involved and it's not that complicated. It takes less than 30 mins to create one. I have created several tokens and am not that technically inclined, so it would makes sense that companies actually interested in blockchain will easily  learn the process.
 So, my question is how does GATCOIN plan to stay viable 6mths - 1yr down the line as most individuals find out that solidarity is not rocket science and most of this scripts can be easily created or emulated. Why will companies subcontract GATCOIN ( a company using ERC 20) to create a token for them when it takes less than 30 mins to create your own ERC 20 token.

Actually can a dev or community manager confirm once and for all, if the minimum for pre sale is 10 or 0.01ETH. It states 10 on the website and ann which seems more plausible, but there has been several post on the thread about it been 0.01. Though 0.01 seems unlikely, it will be the ideal amount to promote an even distribution. though it will also encourage ico pnd.