Every crime is an "inside job". There are people who have some access or authority that they use to do something.

The question with 911 is "who are the inside people, those who abused some access or authority?"

Was it the Muslim hijackers who abused their access to commercial flights?

Was it Zios / Neoscum who abused their access to buildings and perhaps even "access" to Muslim hijackers?

Was it U.S. Militards who abused their access to numerous things?

~~~

Or was it a bunch of scum sucking cancer fucks who had some influence on all of the above groups and carefully arranged for Afghanistan to resume production of a commodity that is largely controlled by the only people who have the ability to brainfuck each of the above groups into believing they are acting on some higher motive?

The bible differs from the Qur'an in many ways. The bible was written by people inspired by God, but the Qur'an is supposed to have been made by Allah himself, and sent down to Muhammad intact via the angel Gabriel.

When you put everything together that happened that day, there is no way that 9/11 could NOT be an inside job, at least in part. Probability is entirely against it.

In addition, some of the pure science of some of the things that happened may be entirely accurate. But when you add the way that the things happened, pure science doesn't apply.

So you do think that if somehow we make Muslims believe their religion is peaceful, they will become peaceful?
I hardly believe that... or did I misunderstand what you said?
Religious folks are the "old time" politicians, btw.

There is no way to show causation without identifying the characters involved but implying or "showing a likelihood of" causation depends on many factors which, in their entirety, do seem to suggest causation. Your specific example of one of the many is, as usual, horseshit though.

The Taliban are local hill people. They did not know where the U.S. was nor did they care. One day they hear the news that a 'guest' of theirs may have been involved in a crime in that faraway place "the United States". Their response was "Show us some evidence and if it is reasonable evidence we will deliver him". America's response to that offer was the invasion. In other words the invasion was going to happen no matter what the Taliban did.

You have to ask why there was such a priority to invade Afghanistan. Research the Taliban a bit. They are utterly harmless to other countries, including the U.S., even if they are a bit simple and untechnological. Do they kill adulterers? Sure. Don't commit adultery there, or don't get caught. Do they have the slightest interest in bombing any other country? They do not.

You don't know what the motive for the attacks was yet.

A person could speculate that the motive was to increase the sale of aspirin in Mexico. In that case the 911 attacks were poorly constructed and a complete failure.


A: Others getting caught.
B: In the United States "Psychological impact" is not a factor. It's like the "fluffy factor" with pillows. More fluffy? Less fluffy? Who cares. Hard to measure.
C: O.P.M. Other peoples' money. If the 911 organizers were having to buy their own explosives etc out of pocket it would have been a smaller affair.

It's nice to have an academic formula to solve this sort of thing but it must apply.

In any crime first the context. A multibillion dollar business that has always been the domain of militaries and intelligence agencies, more than any other industry, except weapons.

The day before 911 the Taliban had been on track to eliminate opium cultivation. Almost immediately after 911 cultivation started again. It soon surpassed even the record highs of the previous decade.

....

and so on, and so on... can you please cut the Taqqyia? Muhammad himself would resemble more of an....

I do find it interesting how prevalent "these inside job" theories are, yet we're at 34 pages and I haven't seen any logical theory that actually makes sense yet.

Here's a kind of thought experiment that I came up with, where you put yourself in the shoes of a person in charge of the hypothetical "inside job":

So, your mission is to orchestrate a false flag event, the aim of which is to increase the psychological fear of US (and world) citizens, to help get support for illegal wars and occupation of foreign countries, which will allow the US/The West to become richer and more powerful.

You have 3 factors to think about, which follow in what I consider to be order of importance. (I realize there are more factors involved, but these 3 are the really important ones IMO)

A: Chance of getting caught
B: Amount of psychological impact
C: Cost

So, the ideal false flag attack will score low on A and C, but highly on B.

What type of attack would you set up? Would it have any resemblance to 9/11?

Let's consider the classic hypothetical 9/11 false flag, with planes, explosive charges and a pentagon missile. Now, this event scores highly on B, but also scores incredibly highly on A and C.

If you score according to the 3 factors, then this type of complex attack makes no sense. By including explosive charges and missiles (posing as more planes), the orchestrator would be massively increasing the scores on A and C, without significantly increasing the score for B. It would make much more sense to simplify the plan, and just use planes.

I look forward to hearing your hypothetical false flag attacks!

Yes, comparing anything is a logical fallacy.   People seem to use these words lightly around here these days (there is no contradiction). I was not talking about a fully self supported colony, I was talking about getting there (i.e. flying to Mars multiple times). Read:
Nice try though.

How much has been invested to achieve that goal? Less and less money (e.g. NASA budget cuts). It seems simple, however it is not.

The Catholic conquest of the new world exterminated around 400 million natives, and forcibly converted the remainder of the population to Christianity. Many of the genocide perpetrators of that time are being revered as "Saints" now.
...

I wonder what would have happened to the academics, had they made the discovery in the ISIS controlled part of Syria. Most probably, they would have been accused of blasphemy, and then stoned to death. I just hope that these researchers will be safe from any death threats and suicide attacks. However, I am worried, as England is the same country which has sent more than 1,000 recruits to the ISIS.

Your post is spam and off topic. This is not a NASA mission. Please read other replies before posting something.
It looks like their budget is only $7B which is peanuts compared to how much countries are wasting in random wars around the world.

here its there https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11_attacks   

In my childhood, I don't even know what is religion & what I am belongs to.
I had every religion friends with me. Some are my best friends. Education explained me the region thing.
In my childhood whenever there some bomb blasts or some bad thing happens, then my guardians used to say some bad people doing this.
I still don't want to categorize my friends in religion thing, But politics plays vital role to categorize them.
We can't blame religion for some lame people.
The only people do bad to humans or anything, is who don't believe in god or human being.

I have been browsing on the internet about martial arts specializing in weapons like knife and other bladed weapon.(Kali Esckrima or other martial art using bladed weapon) but i can always set that there`s always a debate about it like. why would they learn martial arts if they can shoot from a distance(Gun or any Projectile weapon). What do you think?

True. And each time it was a sin. For that matter the Bible is not even from Christianity. It was put together as a collection under Roman rule and is an official government document. We have lost most of the original Christian gospels when the Bible was made. Only books that fit with Roman sensibilities and law were allowed. These official books have also changed greatly from their original iterations.
Take for example the Sumerian story of Gilgamesh. God destroyed the world in a flood, one guy made an ark and filled it with animals to repopulate the planet. Sound familiar? It's the story that Noah and the ark is derived from. In other cases widely read Christian books were banned. The "Gospel according to Mary" was one such book. The Romans were completely against the idea of a women's role in religion. There must be priests and the priests must be men. It's the Roman way! They can't have a book in the Bible with lines like "But if the Savior made her worthy, who are you indeed to reject her? Surely the Savior knows her very well."    

P.S. If Lot can screw his daughters to increase the population then I should be able to repopulate the Earth with my sister. (This would be creepier if I had a sister   )

....

The problem is that puts some guys opinion superior to Gods infallible word. It makes me wonder what other things I could change. Could I have sex with my sister? Why not, Couldn't I just come up with some words that justify it. ....

I'm confused. That passage specifically says that you can not change any part of the Bible. If you add or subtract any part then God will punish you.  Which is my point. It is clearly a sin for a Christian woman to leave her head uncovered. If you see one, then you should hold her down and cut off her hair. That's God's rule, not mine.

...most victims aren’t evil, but virtually all evil people think they are victims, and thus justify their violence.....