~ about the accounts. I don't have any of those anymore. i got rid of them long ago.
Even if you claim to have "got rid" of those accounts, you are still breaking the rules of this forum by evading bans, since at least one of your previous accounts has been banned. And you have been doing it for years. 5/20/2019 6:20:47 AM Changed to Archived status Autoban user aTriz [ BPIP] [ FLAG - archive [ 1] [ 2]] and jamalaezaz [ BPIP] [ FLAGS - archive [ 1] [ 2]] were controlled by the same account as recently as 11/9/2019 according to BPIPSec Log info and 1/13/2023 according to the FLAGS page. I you look at the BPIP flag pages - Flag 2812 atriz opposed the lag against themself on that date while having not posted since 2021-07-25, 00:11:39Uncanny how these two UID's flags were last updated within one hour of each other on BPIP as though someone had been looking at both?
The previous Flag against jamalaezaz I opposed as the creator of the Flag was not the creator of the thread and jamalaezaz was not the subject of that thread (my opposition was on the grounds the Flag was incorrectly created) - This thread is solely concerning jamalaezaz and after careful consideration, I have created a new Flag and asks others to support it, please.
|
|
|
I was giving red tagged to @OP account when he create this thread, but the sad thing I'm not on DT network and my tag doesn't show as trusted feedback.
You may not be DT1 at the moment, but with good posts and a few merits under your belt, you'll get there. In the meantime, don't be afraid to give honest negative trust feedback where warranted. Eventually, it will become "trusted" feedback and will be seen by others. (It'll be seen now by anyone doing due diligence too).
|
|
|
I vaguely recall SiNeReiNZzz had a twitter account - can anyone recall what it is, or, other social media profiles?
|
|
|
Problem is, there is a lack of even an average newbies so what will high ranking members do when there's lack of decent newbies other than share the merit among themselves.
Supply and demand.The merit sources don't share the merits amongst themselves in your above senario. The less merits to share around, the harder it is to obtain those merits should equate to higher quality posts to obtain the fewer merits on offer. Less merits = better, quality posts.Quick workaround for your request could be made with BPIP extension or script, if someone is willing to make more pseudo-ranks like Veteran or Elite, maybe even Retired for inactive members.
BPIP's greasemonkey script already shows banned and inactive. Someone else made a script to show posts reported. No doubt a script could be created for "Fantasmigroical" if need be.
OP: Why do you want to break your arm patting yourself on the back with a new rank?
|
|
|
The most I can say is that I received a red letter on a very large deal seized and that my kids life is currently in danger.
If you've entered into a deal that endangers your family that makes you shady as all fuck and you can't be trusted to repay a loan.
|
|
|
I'm just going to put this here before it gets quoted and the quotes under it are the ones I refer to in my negative trust feedback: | Timelord2067 | | 2023-01-28 | | Reference | | jamalaezaz has started a thread asking for forgiveness. In 2016 I connected two other UID's. marlboroza (2018) , nutildah (2021) and IIRC others have connected a great number of UID's back to jamalaezaz.
Note to self: This negative is not to be removed. ~jamalaezaz (Delete) |
@LFC_Bitcoin - please review the above and reconsider your removed distrust in this person.
The previous Flag against jamalaezaz I opposed as the creator of the Flag was not the creator of the thread and jamalaezaz was not the subject of that thread (my opposition was on the grounds the Flag was incorrectly created) - This thread is solely concerning jamalaezaz and after careful consideration, I have created a new Flag and asks others to support it, please.
|
|
|
They're really deserved it and in my opinion, a highest rank (new one) should be applied for 10,000+ or 20,000+ merit. No more rank above it so its requirement should be really high.
The ones with 10,000 merits are mostly merit sources gifting each-other nonsensically high merits for essentially glib posts to each-other with none of the trickle down effect that @theymos was hoping for to help those at lower rank positions rank up. The only place where the ranks count is in the campaigns where legendary pays higher than hero etc. I could have posted this comment in another thread this week where it has become clear a handful of newbies are alts all participating in the pumpkin merit competition. Why? Because they are scrounging a living creating alts to then joining multiple (or the same) signature campaigns. theymos' experiment with merits as a means of rank promotion is an abject failure as the DT1 merit sources golden shower each-other with high merits for status and the newbies get nothing trickling down, hence their prolific shit posting and alt farms. There is never a reason to merit more than one or two merits and, once you attain the rank of legendary, then you don't need merits being bestowed on you if all you are going to do is merit other legendary users, not those below you in the ranking positions.
|
|
|
I was out all day yesterday and wasn't able to see any games yesterday. Overseas, I got bets on the Leicester, Saracens, Gloucester and London Irish about to play. Closer to home: I won on New Zealand, South Africa and Fiji (to win) then lucked out on Australia who were defeated by France. (3/4)
This morning in Sydney 7's Mens, I'm playing it safe with bets on all the favoured sides: USA to bet Uruguay, Kenya to bet Spain, Canada over Tonga, Argentina to defeat Japan, after yesterday's games I'll say Ireland to win Vs Grt Britain, then New Zealand over rivals France with a close finish between South Africa and Fiji. Sydney 7's Women:Last of the big spenders, I've put a dollar on each of the following: Canada to bet Spain, ever hopeful Grt Britain to bet hosts Australia, Fiji will give Japan a lesson, as will USA over France then the Irish will show the Kiwis how its done. 6666
|
|
|
I think it's a dud idea.
I've just ticked over 2000 merits - 1000 merits for having done the hard yards over the years and the second 1000 merits for posting what others have thought are meritorious. (And not one "give a leg up to some one close to ranking up" merit).
Yah me.
|
|
|
1. The person died 2. The person is in prison 3. The account has been hacked or sold/bough There might have any other reason but can't guess.
In the end if fiat money as opposed to crypto had been lent by a brick and mortar bank, then said bank would have marked them as having defaulted on their loan much sooner.
|
|
|
This is my 300th post I think you have made a little mistake while typing 3000th but typed 300th. There is a missing 0 which made 10% of the total amount of posts. That means 0=2700 posts! Wooowowowowoow! It is nothing but an awesome change for the missing of a 0. Perhaps the other 2700 posts are retweets?
|
|
|
It's interesting that people will cling to Bitcoin for it's perceived privacy then turn around and make public their "losses" (in this case through theft) making public their wallet addresses etc - Which gives an insight into the tally of funds a person has/had and (in the case of self funded physical items bearing wallet addresses) where those funds came from.
e.g. Exchanges, other users... Theoretically even other scams or thefts.
|
|
|
Flag supported.
There's a couple of people who DT trust him. Hopefully they revoke their support soon.
|
|
|
Why not on Coldkey u=2614643 as well? SiNeReiNZzz - FlagDefaulted in a loan facilitated by shasan on 2021-11-11 and has been offline since 2022-03-05
Coldkey - FlagAlt of yogg
|
|
|
There's definitely some remarkable talent in our ranks - I certainly hope that the two artists I've lined up to contribute to the shared book live up to the works of others.
|
|
|
Yeah, that is also my friend's account.
Regardless of everything you say, reasons, friends, relatives and so on, maybe those reasons are familiar to us, FACT: later on, they will admit to themselves that it's their Alt. I've also done a comparison of the pumpkin carving images - have a look and tell me what you think: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5416347.msg61651638#msg61651638
|
|
|
According to tjtonmoy [ HERE] Tanvi50_ is their sister and halim50_ is a friend That alternate account belongs to my sister. It's Tanvi50_. So technically it's not mine, but I do have access to it. My what strong hands Tanvi50_ has (notice the nails chewed down to the stumps and back glow?) I have seen onions, orange, pumkins... Thought why not a potato! Let's hope thia gets selected. Very similar to tjtonmoy's own hands, wouldn't you say? Can't find any pumpkins but thought this would be funny. Trust the process Same with halim50_'s hands and keyboard / backlighting... Must run in the family.
|
|
|
We had a chat in telegram and I confirm that I've accepted this loan request and sent 220usdt to above address. Txid: 0x60dccb54d0071e03ca7ca684dd525983b0c172702071aa2abad86ed3573a6ed5
Please repay 0.017 BTC on or before 48hrs to:
bc1qqsgsm8ahc2v5epc6al5vvstrmsj7yk0vkpa2k3
| shasan | | 2023-01-23 | | Reference | | Active 0.017 BTC non-collateral loan. Repayment should be made on or before 25th January 5 am. |
| shasan | | 2023-01-25 | | Reference | | The loan was extended to 28th January as the lender has no other option. |
Yes, I can withdraw instantly. No rollover required. Just need to wait for my vip host to send the bonus. That’s why I said 48 hours.
It’s not possible to lose the balance as I am not gambling. I am playing for wager only. Example baccarat and betting both sides. Or dice 98%
So - you are gambling with the loaned funds.
More than likely your gambling habit got the better of you.
Gotta love trolls who have nothing else to do. Are you that bored that you need to comment on a post that you know nothing about? 🤡 I have one loan and it’s with Edward and he’s aware I posted another thread for $100 loan. You sound stupid. 🤡
Speaking of Trolling - it was only a day ago you were gloating that you got the loan, now you're saying you can't pay it back on time.
|
|
|
|