I had given you negative trust a long time ago since you are a scammer. Do I get anything? You can send to the multisig address in my profile.
At this point you are clearly trying to just troll to get the lowest possible trust score as many people who were discovered as scammers have done.
 BHAHAHA. Your response only confirms how much of a good job I am doing here at busing scams, especially yours  |
|
|
|
Removal, no
Trim, yes
I think it is pretty clear that you just want the people who keep tagging all of your accounts and all of your HYIP's off of default trust so it will be easier for you to scam  The thing is that people throughout the community trust and respect me enough so that regardless of my status on default trust that they will listen when I say that I think you are running a particular scam so default trust or not, the "investments" that flow into your HYIP's will screech to a halt once I out them as being run by you  |
|
|
|
|
I had given you negative trust a long time ago since you are a scammer. Do I get anything? You can send to the multisig address in my profile.
At this point you are clearly trying to just troll to get the lowest possible trust score as many people who were discovered as scammers have done.
|
|
|
|
From the looks of it TheGambler is infecting people with malware via the Coinichiwa chat -snip-
The webaddress is www dropbox com s hbosomsnyicqxtf 999dice.exe?dl=0 <--malware
Like I said though, it says Link not found at dropbox. They have took it off there I imagine.
No, this all started when someone in Coinichiwa posted what they said was a 999dice.exe script. I downloaded it. That very same day is when the money in fortune jack got stolen. I was online when all this was happening too. It was like they was using teamviewer to control my computer. I didn't have enough in Cryptsy for them to withdraw, but my fortunejack records still show what addresses they sent the stolen funds to if that may help some.
IP address (likely a proxy/VPN) 188.138.140.106
This is not confirmed however it fits his MO How did you make a link from me to the dropbox URL? Did someone use TheGambler in chat or did you just decide to frame me lol More than happy to take responsibility for this because YOLO. I did it, that's my IP LOVE how Quickseller thinks everything he says, goes. All of your bs opinions aren't the truth but based on your thoughts which I find hilarious. Because other people know it, but you and I both know half the shit you say here (like me hacking that guys account) was a complete load of garbage. You say you have nothing to do with the hack yet you previously admitted to being behind the hack. I would like to ask you what exactly you are smoking that makes you think your claim of innocence has any kind of merit? I also want to know where you are getting it because I want some. ;( I took the blame because for starters I didn't think I would make a return here, for seconds at that time I took responsibility for more than 5 different scam acts only one (NextPonzi) did I actually commit You know it wasn't me, and with that proof it shows it wasn't me...It isn't possible that it was me lol Well kets hope that you have been stocking up on cigarettes and anal lube because you are going to need both in the hopefully very near future. We both know that you have been scamming consistently all year from a number of HYIPs but haven't had any high level account to vouch for it because I had tagged them all. |
|
|
|
bump...
compiling more evidence in OP
lol moreia, you haven't added anything to the OP. Again I ask you what you are smoking? You seriously need to lay off the drugs. I'd also suggest putting your sales/marketing skills to good use and get an actual job instead of constantly scamming as you are getting much closer then you think to getting caught in RL |
|
|
|
From the looks of it TheGambler is infecting people with malware via the Coinichiwa chat -snip-
The webaddress is www dropbox com s hbosomsnyicqxtf 999dice.exe?dl=0 <--malware
Like I said though, it says Link not found at dropbox. They have took it off there I imagine.
No, this all started when someone in Coinichiwa posted what they said was a 999dice.exe script. I downloaded it. That very same day is when the money in fortune jack got stolen. I was online when all this was happening too. It was like they was using teamviewer to control my computer. I didn't have enough in Cryptsy for them to withdraw, but my fortunejack records still show what addresses they sent the stolen funds to if that may help some.
IP address (likely a proxy/VPN) 188.138.140.106
This is not confirmed however it fits his MO How did you make a link from me to the dropbox URL? Did someone use TheGambler in chat or did you just decide to frame me lol More than happy to take responsibility for this because YOLO. I did it, that's my IP LOVE how Quickseller thinks everything he says, goes. All of your bs opinions aren't the truth but based on your thoughts which I find hilarious. Because other people know it, but you and I both know half the shit you say here (like me hacking that guys account) was a complete load of garbage. You say you have nothing to do with the hack yet you previously admitted to being behind the hack. I would like to ask you what exactly you are smoking that makes you think your claim of innocence has any kind of merit? I also want to know where you are getting it because I want some. ;( |
|
|
|
IDK why supa even dislikes me so much. All I did was tag one of his alts, and declined to remove my negative trust when requested by him, even though the negative trust I left is "against the rules". I take it as a compliment when scammers open up these kinds of threads against me, although I really haven't done anything to pill off supa |
|
|
|
|
While purchasing accounts for a client I had entered into agreements for more accounts then my budget allowed for (I agreed to use escrow with a seller, he logged off for long enough for me to think he rejected my offer, then I made a deal to buy all that I needed) and as a result I have a Full member account that I do not need. (I cannot post from it due to contract restrictions with my current signature campaign).
The account is described as follows:
Full Member (quantity - 1)
Registered: 2014
Feedback: Neutral
Activity: 120+
Posts:160+
Feedback: Neutral
Trust: 0: -0 / +0(0)
On Default Trust: No
Signed message: yes
Starting bid:.05 BTC
Bid increment: .005 BTC
BIN: .09 BTC (or .02 BTC above the high bid, whichever is greater) *the BIN may be negotiable
End time: April 28 2015 2:00 AM GMT (forum time) (48 hours from now)
Payment is due within 24 hours of the winner being announced, in the event that the winner does not pay within 24 hours then the next highest bidder will be expected to honor his bid and will have 24 hours to pay for their bid.
|
|
|
|
|
He isn't accepting bids via PM, he is accepting BIN offers via PM.
|
|
|
|
Untracked shipping to USA is 0.05BTC
.23 with escrow only.
How is escrow suppose to work if there is not even a tracking number available to confirm that any package made it to the buyer's address? |
|
|
|
|
Which point would you refute? The fact that people sell their accounts because they need money? That people scam because they need money? Or that when people have one way to get money cut off they will naturally try another way to get money?
|
|
|
|
|
I have a question:
If account trading is banned (and assuming this ban could be enforced), then you could not sell your account.
If a major reason why people sell their accounts is because they need money to cover some expense AND
If a major reason why many people scam is because they need money (some people are just scumbags and scam because they are too lazy to work for themselves) THEN
If account trading is banned, wouldn't we see an increase in the number of scams and scam attempts? Or is my logic somehow flawed?
|
|
|
|
|
Gift cards tend to sell at a larger discount then 1.3%, Amazon gift cards sold by members with high trust levels (so there is little risk of buying a stolen card) tend to sell for roughly 85% of their face value as a rule of thumb, other gift cards that cannot purchase as wide of a variety of items tend to sell at a larger discount because there is less people who potentially will need it (less demand)
|
|
|
|
I'm looking to buy 0.23BTCs in exchange for a 50$ iTunes card. We will use an escrow, and I recommend SebastianJu, but you can offer another one if you'd like.
Bitstamp is trading at $226.10 right now. .23 * $226.10 = $51.31. If someone wanted an iTunes gift card why wouldn't they buy one directly from apple or on gyft instead of paying a premium  |
|
|
|
We have come to an agreement. I just don't have BTC ready right now so have asked for his paypal id for partial payment. Most of it is solved. Should be all resolved by tomorrow. Will keep everybody updated.
Edit: killyou72 logged off and I am now waiting for him to reply. Have also given him my skype contact so that we can have a quick chat and get this solved. Waiting for him to come back online.....
Since it appears that you now have some BTC it would probably be a good idea for killyou72 to request a refund in BTC. |
|
|
|
It would probably not be a good idea to deal with the OP. He has a history of very shady dealings, including one recently with him receiving an extra $200 on a $700 trade and refusing to refund the difference. Also: We have come to an agreement. I just don't have BTC ready right now so have asked for his paypal id for partial payment. Most of it is solved. Should be all resolved by tomorrow. Will keep everybody updated.
-snip-
How is the OP planning on buying gold bars if he doesn't have any BTC? Even if escrow is used, there is nothing to say that the OP will not claim nothing actually arrived, or that something arrived that was not as described. |
|
|
|
Yup CoinTop is one of his and so is mikecoin2. There were a few others that were already tagged.
I am not sure about his claim about stealing 20 BTC as escrow because that isn't something that I remember and people would probably have made a pretty big deal about it.
Also 1.2 is a pretty big deal for someone to do without escrow especially with an untrusted person, I would doubt that unless his hero account has a good amount of trust then escrow would probably be used. If this was the case then the account would probably be worth more then the 1.2 he plans on stealing
Yeah when he said 20 BTC i was really shocked, i mean to take that from somebody and not feel the slightest bit sorry is crazy. He seems to think he is teaching people a life lesson. The amounts he stole from users were very small in the cases of his alts that were already tagged with negative trust. I call BS on his claims |
|
|
|
|
Yup CoinTop is one of his and so is mikecoin2. There were a few others that were already tagged.
I am not sure about his claim about stealing 20 BTC as escrow because that isn't something that I remember and people would probably have made a pretty big deal about it.
Also 1.2 is a pretty big deal for someone to do without escrow especially with an untrusted person, I would doubt that unless his hero account has a good amount of trust then escrow would probably be used. If this was the case then the account would probably be worth more then the 1.2 he plans on stealing
|
|
|
|
Seems like every time I turn around there's some issue with default trust.
Maybe all the humans on there should be replaced with versions of that AI that just got released from Swiss police custody, which engage in transactions where they can verify if trust was broken. For example, a PayPal default trust bot sells BTC-equivalent Bitcointalk tokens, ensures the buyer doesn't chargeback for 1 year, positive or neg trust for the risked BTC if they do or don't. A software default trust bot publishes unique coding tasks (that can't be plagiarized) for BTC-equivalent Bitcointalk tokens in various programming languages, then validates the code. Leaves neg trust if code is invalid/errors, removes neg trust if tokens are returned.
Any other ideas?
How would this account for the fact that certain human judgment is necessary when trying to look at if something is a scam or not. The trust system is not a trade feedback system, but is a trust system. This would also not account for the fact that it is not possible to for a computer to know for sure if a trade was successful or not (e.g. buying bitcoin for cash in mail, mailing some physical good to a buyer, etc). It would also not account for things like people who are clearly engaging in trades for no reasons other then to get additional feedback (e.g. clear trust farming) I left off those examples because it would have taken me too long at the time to rough sketch the bot code. However, there a number of virtual mailboxes that operate off http://about.usps.com/forms/ps1583.pdf - a method that could conceivably be used to verify physical item receipt via the bot running a counterfeit check on the scanned bills and object recognition of physical goods shot from the proper perspective. Ultimate disposal of the cash or goods would probably have to be done by the agent in exchange for service credit or conversion to an ACH payment into the bot's account, which I suppose would be used to buy BTC and/or pay for more goods/gigs, or the bot's own hosting fees. Trust farming could be screened for by having alternate bot usernames or human investigators retest anyone who gets trusted by the default trust bots. Well it sounds like your system would be a good trade feedback system. Although it would not do anything to prevent scams from happening in the first place. For example if a user is offering a too good to be true offer then how is an unexperienced user suppose to know that it is probably a scam? I know that tomatocage often screens people's actual willingness to accept escrow with newbie accounts and flags them with his own account when they show signs of not accepting escrow (e.g. they stop responding). What about people who make statements that they are desperate for money then all of a sudden start to sell something very expensive? What about face-to-face deals and other deals not done within the forum? |
|
|
|
It would be helpful if you can post the price you have in your mind and i will tell you if i can do it ! I certainly have more than 25 accounts so i can full-fill your need if price is good
PM sent (we have had a discussion via PM, but I want to make it clear that you were not ignored) I'll be waiting for your reply about it! ~Regards Sky Replied
I had a successful deal with chronicsky. As of now I do not need additional accounts. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
