Bitcoin Forum
June 07, 2024, 06:38:42 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 [544] 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 ... 751 »
10861  Other / Meta / Re: As A Dog Returneth To His Vomit - Quickseller Reloaded on: April 25, 2015, 06:02:50 PM
You are trolling. People do not get banned for speaking out against the trading of accounts, nor do they get banned for speaking out against the staff/administration. I have spoken out against the moderation of the forum plenty of times and never have been banned.

Even if people did get banned for speaking out against the administration/staff then your main account would get banned as well because BadBear/theymos is able to determine which accounts you alts are and proceed to ban them as well
10862  Economy / Invites & Accounts / Re: [WTB] Full Member Accounts on: April 25, 2015, 05:29:30 PM
I can provide the accounts in week as low as 0.07 btc each.
If I haven't found another seller by that time then I most likely would be able to take you up on your offer. I am looking for a total of 15 accounts as of right now.

It would be helpful if you can post the price you have in your mind and i will tell you if i can do it ! I certainly have more than 25 accounts so i can full-fill your need if price is good
PM sent (we have had a discussion via PM, but I want to make it clear that you were not ignored)
10863  Other / Meta / Re: As A Dog Returneth To His Vomit - Quickseller Reloaded on: April 25, 2015, 05:24:27 PM
>how do you know if someone 'owns' more than one forum account
The same way I'd know the identity of any other scammer - he slips up & gets owned.
Quickseller, for instance, was forced to admit to controlling ACCTSeller account. Not sure what point you're trying to make.
I am not a scammer, nor did I slip up. I was not forced to admit anything.

You are trolling.

Of course you were forced to admit it. Shall I drag up the post where you, posting under ACCTSeller, refuse to admit to being a sock, and demand me to prove it?
Getting a bit old Undecided
Why don't you point to the post where I was forced to admit them both belonging to me? The fact that I was not previously willing to publicly admit to both accounts being mine means nothing.
10864  Other / Meta / Re: As A Dog Returneth To His Vomit - Quickseller Reloaded on: April 25, 2015, 05:11:28 PM
>how do you know if someone 'owns' more than one forum account
The same way I'd know the identity of any other scammer - he slips up & gets owned.
Quickseller, for instance, was forced to admit to controlling ACCTSeller account. Not sure what point you're trying to make.
I am not a scammer, nor did I slip up. I was not forced to admit anything.

You are trolling.
10865  Other / Meta / Re: As A Dog Returneth To His Vomit - Quickseller Reloaded on: April 25, 2015, 05:03:26 PM
I was asked to purchase a number of accounts on behalf of a client. This was likely because of my expertise in dealing in forum accounts. Not that any of this is any of your business
10866  Economy / Invites & Accounts / Re: Selling: FULL MEMBER BITCOINTALK ACCOUNT 0.079 on: April 25, 2015, 04:39:19 PM

reducing the price to 0.079, still up for grabs.
I am interested in it. I am about to send you a PM

I thought you no longer dealt in forum accounts? Whahappened?
That is really none of your business TBH, however a client asked me to purchase a number of accounts on his behalf so that is what I am doing.
10867  Economy / Invites & Accounts / [WTB] Full Member Accounts[closed] on: April 25, 2015, 03:19:45 PM
I am looking to buy a good number of full member accounts.

Any account that I purchase will need to have a signed message from a address posted in an old, unedited post in order to prove ownership.

I am able to offer competitive pricing however I do have a certain budget that I am restricted to.

All accounts must have either neutral of positive trust when viewed from a trust list that only includes DefaultTrust with a trust depth of 2.

Please either post or PM offers.
10868  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Last in first out on: April 25, 2015, 02:53:17 PM
I believe from an accounting perspective the actual inventory you sell should not matter (when selling physical goods you should always sell in a FIFO basis for the actual goods), but if you use FIFO or LIFO (or specific lot) is merely an entry on your tax forms and on your books.

I don't think that coinbase reports the tax basis of the bitcoin you purchase to the IRS (I may be incorrect on this), so it would be up to you to accurately input the basis based on what method you elect to use (based on what you can use based on tax law).

I honestly don't think bitcointalk is the best place to get tax advice and a tax advisor would probably be a better source of information for this kind of thing
But this is going to matter a lot.  This 50 dollars will be deducted out of my account. Do this a few times and your balance will be zero.
No actual money will be deducted from your coinbase account regardless of if they do FIFO or LIFO.

When you buy 1 BTC at $250, then $250 will be deducted from your account. Then when you go to sell 1 BTC at $275 then $275 will be added to your account. They are not offering any kind of futures contract.
10869  Economy / Invites & Accounts / Re: Selling: FULL MEMBER BITCOINTALK ACCOUNT 0.079 on: April 25, 2015, 02:45:53 PM

reducing the price to 0.079, still up for grabs.
I am interested in it. I am about to send you a PM
10870  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Last in first out on: April 25, 2015, 02:36:19 PM
I believe from an accounting perspective the actual inventory you sell should not matter (when selling physical goods you should always sell in a FIFO basis for the actual goods), but if you use FIFO or LIFO (or specific lot) is merely an entry on your tax forms and on your books.

I don't think that coinbase reports the tax basis of the bitcoin you purchase to the IRS (I may be incorrect on this), so it would be up to you to accurately input the basis based on what method you elect to use (based on what you can use based on tax law).

I honestly don't think bitcointalk is the best place to get tax advice and a tax advisor would probably be a better source of information for this kind of thing
10871  Other / Archival / Re: Quickseller, trust abuse, innacurate negative ratings, unprofesional escrow... on: April 25, 2015, 09:30:08 AM
What do you mean "get on the bad side"? If you have problems with other people and "tend to call people out" then definitely you have more chances of people calling you out too. But if you never had a shady behavior it would be very difficult for them to do so (unless they're just plain lying but in that case it shouldn't be difficult to have them removed from the default trust list).

Unless of course your name is Vod, then you are free to make up things about people and leave negative ratings for whatever you feel like. I never made an exchange with him or been suspected of shady behavior either and he claims I lied about him  (since when is that an acceptable use of default trust?). He is still very much on the default trust list still abusing away at it playing rent a cop.

I find it amazing how much shit you guys are giving Quickseller when Vod does this kind of thing several times a month.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=915823.0

Well at least with Quickseller we have the chance to have a look at the beginning. If you were to take a look at his trust ratings from trusted members, very few of them were from amounts or trades wothy enough to put him in default trust. At least not if you put him in perspective with other members. One could even say that he was purposely putting  down such trades to earn that trust. Funny thing is that he goes after users bullying them that they're trying to 'buy trust' while he himself is probably the most shady person in the default trust.

He has supposedly stopped dealing accounts, but no one can actually guarantee that he's also stopped doing that from his alts. Tongue
What are you talking about? A large amount of the trust that I have received is from people I have not even traded with at all, but rather was received because of the contribution to the community by busting scams. The majority of the rest of the transactions of which I have received positive trust from people on default trust were either from people who had risked funds when trading with me (e.g. they either used me as escrow or they sent first) or were for transactions in excess of 1 BTC. If you seriously think that I am engaging in farming trust then you really have no idea what you are talking about.
10872  Other / Meta / Re: Quickseller Gave me a negative trust Without Considering any possibility on: April 25, 2015, 09:19:01 AM
Your addresses are not those of an exchange. I sent you a list of addresses that are likely part of the wallet file none of which are associated with an exchange; Blazr did a much more in-depbth analysis of each of the addresses giving additional evidence that they are not exchange addresses.

Furthermore, you opened up a scam accusation against Ume at most two hours prior to contacting him to buy the account. This means one of two things, one - you faked the sale in order to attempt to protect the trust rating of your account, or more likely, two - opened the scam accusation in order to put pressure on Ume to sell any account he had in his possession cheaply, which according to your screenshots you were able to do. Regardless it is more then appropriate to let the negative trust remain on the account.

No, it might not be of an exchange, could very well be a gambling site.

I contacted him prior to 2 hours,yes, and that was after I realized he was trying to scam. I also posted about a possible alternate account. All what you are saying is speculation, and does not prove a scam, my other account has been pointing out various scams on the forum.

Read my posts above, All I am saying is what you are posting about me being a scammer is based on a possbility , and it in no way proves a scam. I am open to Badbear or any other admin and do IP checks/Tor use/etc anything to prove that.

The address is not that of a gambling site. The reason it is not a gambling site is similar to the reason why it is not that of an exchange.

You purchased the account from an alt after less then two hours after opening a scam accusation against Ume. Your admission of this fact is confirmation that the intention of opening the scam accusation was nothing more then to try to buy an account at a lower price then what the market would normally otherwise allow, and you did
10873  Economy / Lending / Re: Quickseller Short Term Loans, up to 15 [btc] available [collateral] on: April 25, 2015, 09:13:18 AM
Need 0.03 BTC loan and have a member account as collateral.

1NSB5NKi4FzKaJ5aXpLKGSoxJDMMfpQcSn

If you confirm this loan then please tell me and I will PM account details.
I will repay before Monday.
Please read the OP. The only accounts that I accept as collateral are hero+ accounts.

Deleting your request from my thread to prevent my thread from being overcome with signature spam
10874  Other / Meta / Re: Trim or eliminate "default trust" on: April 25, 2015, 08:56:27 AM
Can I ask you one thing? If ACCTseller is an alt of quickseller .... Why did he leave a negative trust also from his alt account? It doesn't have any sense or an I wrong? I only want to ask that thing publicly.

Thanks for the attention.
The trust left by ACCTseller was the result of something that should not result in a trade with caution tag, but is still something that others should be warned about - leaving such trust is a third option above leaving negative/neutral trust from your default trust account. The negative I left for scamming TF is because tspacepilot clearly scammed and an actual scam is more then enough of a reason to cause someone to have a trade with caution tag
10875  Economy / Marketplace / Re: Question for the Physical Crypto Community on: April 25, 2015, 08:30:14 AM
I would say that having a central issuer generate the key pairs, and ensure the associated public address is funded prior to shipping is most likely going to be preferable over the buyer creating the private keys himself.

Evidence of this would be the secondary market for Lealana coins. When smoothie auctions off his coins, he gives the option for the buyer to either fund the coins prior to shipping, or for him to mark the coins as "buyer funded" with a laser. The premium for buyer funded Lealana coins tends to be significantly smaller then the premium for funded coins, often times by 50%. My observation of the prices that Casascius coins sell for when they are funded vs. redeemed vs unfunded would cause me to reach a similar conclusion.

My understanding of the target market of SilverWallets is that SilverWallets is targeted towards people who wish to keep their coins safe in a unique way. Silver wallets actually come with three holograms, so if someone were to create a key pair, fund the corresponding address with 1 BTC and then later sell the coin, they could first redeem the 1 BTC they had previously funded the coin with and then sell the coin with a hologram not yet applied to the coin.

Generating the keypairs yourself also allows you to publicly publish a list of addresses associated with each of your coins. This will allow a potential secondary market buyer to easily check the "balance" of the address associated with a coin if only the first bits are displayed on the coin. Mike published a PGP signed list of all the addresses associated with his project and smoothie will PGP sign a list of addresses of the coins you buy when you win one of his auctions via PM (which allows a buyer to later prove the address, and the associated balance when he decides to sell it).

I am curious to hear more about your solution to not needing to use a tamper proof hologram/sticker anymore.
10876  Economy / Lending / Re: ★★★ Get Quick Loans For Your Needs, Neotox Fast Loans ★★★ on: April 25, 2015, 08:25:57 AM
I hope you realize that if you look at this person's trust that they have an unpaid loan, as well as overall negative trust. I think it is fair to say that it is more then likely that this person is not going to repay any amounts of money that you lend to them
i checked his last posts and there was no loan request since last 2 months
i hope he pay back
The loan he defaulted on was requested on February 7 and he never repaid the lender. In theory if he does not repay the loan then you can sell the account, although negative trusted accounts are very difficult to move.
10877  Economy / Lending / Re: ★★★ Get Quick Loans For Your Needs, Neotox Fast Loans ★★★ on: April 25, 2015, 08:15:35 AM
Code:
Amount:  0.01
Interest: 30%
Collateral: forum account
Reason: private
Repayment Amount : 0.013
Repayment Date: 14days
BTC Address: 1KcBzReYZvbeGgiaMip92MMFtTFgDqB3Vm

Sent
https://blockchain.info/tx/7de1272d9f6a420ee439c1036b4eec284d02731efb35ad5ecf17d7ee0b2d3379

Repayment Amount: 0.013
Repayment Date: 09/05/2015

I hope you realize that if you look at this person's trust that they have an unpaid loan, as well as overall negative trust. I think it is fair to say that it is more then likely that this person is not going to repay any amounts of money that you lend to them
10878  Economy / Services / Re: BitcoinPoker.gg/ Fixed Rate Signature Campaign! (Open 21 slots) on: April 25, 2015, 07:38:00 AM
Payment has been sent to participants via ab272a4d532e6e915dc92c4b59a03027243cfb5c3dfce5587790e228385a87ac

If you feel that everything went smoothly please feel free to leave positive trust
10879  Economy / Services / Re: Need Someone To Count Potential Activity on: April 25, 2015, 07:22:04 AM
To not tell this requirement to anyone was also a requirement , you both can't pass the test either now Cheesy
Anyways , @QuickSeller Congrats on Being Dark Green Grin
Well if someone wants some kind of information that requires some level of work to get and would only be beneficial to him then it should be expected that he would pay for such research. I am surprised that so many people were willing to count how much potential activity the OP has for free, although I am fairly certain that a number of people that responded on here did not actually check lol.

Yeah i agree that it requires work but it's nice sometimes to do things for free Cheesy , 0.007 or ~ that amount of btc , doesn't really make a difference .
Yea it is roughly a dollar worth of bitcoin, but ideally the person I am doing the work for will be satisfied with my performance and send some kind of a tip. Also the small amount requested prevents freeloaders from taking advantage of your skills.
10880  Economy / Services / Re: Need Someone To Count Potential Activity on: April 25, 2015, 07:15:08 AM
To not tell this requirement to anyone was also a requirement , you both can't pass the test either now Cheesy
Anyways , @QuickSeller Congrats on Being Dark Green Grin
Well if someone wants some kind of information that requires some level of work to get and would only be beneficial to him then it should be expected that he would pay for such research. I am surprised that so many people were willing to count how much potential activity the OP has for free, although I am fairly certain that a number of people that responded on here did not actually check lol.
Pages: « 1 ... 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 [544] 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 ... 751 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!