Yeah, I think this would be a wise idea, not to mention helpful for others if people are currently in the middle of a deal or loan etc. If you can't log in or PM it could easily look like you've done a runner. It was recently discussed in one of the other ban threads in Meta.

Read the rest of the thread from the beginning and make your own mind up, but it's quite clear he had no intention of paying, nor would it've even be profitable for him to do so. All he wanted people to do was collect some extra dust from his referral link commissions.

It kinda seems that way. The ban was unfortunately timed I must admit, but not all bans are for nefarious reasons, though I don't know the full details in this case.

People are free to boycott whatever they want are they not? You seem to be fine with people boycotting Subway stores when they start selling only Halal meat.

Where were you talking to this agent? I'm sure it has been discussed internally, but there have been many campaigns and users here emailing Amazon requesting they accept Bitcoin and they usually just get a canned response back if any. I'm sure they'll see the benefits of Bitcoin eventually providing the coin keeps growing.

That's not a bad way of doing things and is probably the safest way of assuring a smooth takeover, but the account can still be taken back by proving you own it by signing an address. I guess you've just got to trust or have faith that this won't happen. I'm also sure you and others would negbomb the sold account upon a complaint from the buyer, so maybe that adds a little more security, but it's still not a watertight deal whatever way.

2016 apparently: http://m.imdb.com/title/tt1790809/ I've only seen the first two.


Bruce plays his actionman role well, but he's only really got one character and that's Bruce Willis. If you love action movies and Bruce Willis that's fine, but he's not in the top five actors in the world, unless it's the top five actors who play Bruce Willis  . Jason Statham comes in at number 2  .

All that may or may not be true, or maybe now he's not in the heat of the moment he is constantly aware and overcome with the guilt of what his temper and anger and reckless actions have caused; to commit a regrettable murder of someone he did love and care about. This would weigh on the majority of sane people like a tonne of bricks regardless of his genuine intent.

Probably for the same reasons you are.

Not neccesarily for those reasons. I think Ritz just put that in there to make it fairer and to stop one person gaming the system in whatever way. Ironically it was monday that was the cause of Ritz's deal ceasing operation initially because he was buying multiple accounts to collect the upfront payment (though this was Ritz's fault for offering up-front payments. Also I don't think he originally stated only one account per person was allowed then).

Those were the terms set out by the original operator/owner of the actual deal, but those terms were actually just copied directly from Ritz's thread any way.

Wait Times right down at the bottom on the second post:

waittime = 360;
if(activity >= 15)
        waittime = (int)(90 - activity);
if(activity >= 60)
        waittime=(int)(34.7586 - (0.0793103 * activity));
if(activity >= 100)
        waittime = max((int)(14-(activity/50)), 4);

Howzar has run successful campaigns before, but not one on this scale. An extra 0.0002 is quite a bit, though maybe Stunna will match or better Ritz's rates for next term anyway. We can only hope .

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=600782.0;topicseen

It's not looking good for Howzar though. Looks like he's been banned: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=601491.0

That's a shame you're pulling a Lethn. Sounds like you're tired of being in the wrong and using that ignore button as an excuse to not even bother like he does. Read the other thread. I actually think you have a lot of intelligent things to say (unlike Lethn), but you just seem to mix it up with stuff I just think is completely ignorant and I fundamentally don't agree with, nor do I understand your reasons for believing in it a lot of the time, but if you don't want to continue in intelligent discussions or making your point, then fair enough. I can't do anything about that.

He got them from the top of his head. I don't understand him. He often has a lot of intelligent stuff to say (unlike Lethn) and I enjoy discussing topics with him mostly, but then he says a lot of completely ignorant shit and pulls figures out like that that he's obviously just made up and it's completely baffling. But of course, we are bigots for pointing out bigotry  .

What racism card do I play exactly? You can't say things that are completely racist or which obviously show your distaste of certain minorities and groups then complain and cry when people call you out on them. Thankfully not everyone in the world holds the same beliefs as you.

I thought you didn't read my posts Lethn? You obviously do but only reply when you think an opportunity has arisen for you to get one over on me, but as usual you rush in and present only ignorance. The rest of the time when you know you can't make an intelligent reply you just keep quiet hiding behind that 'ignore' button that you quite clearly only like telling people you've used it on as an excuse to get out of arguing with people far more intelligent than you.

And you're being quite selective with your definition there. I'm not intolerant of other peoples views either if you even bother to read my post in the other thread. You can and are free to make ignorant, racist, xenophobic, intolerant shit all you want, but doesn't mean I won't call you out on it.

To be a bigot you don't have to hate every other thing in the world, but Bryant seems to have quite the penchant for disliking a lot of things like Muslims and immigrants and homosexuals etc and that to me seems pretty intolerant or bigoted or whatever you wish to call it. You're probably not that much of a bigot, but you are an infinite tool.

I actually think it's just posting crap under the sig deals that gets people banned. Probably half of newbs post crap and hollow, generic replies that don't contribute much but they'll probably be fine. Obviously if they become disruptive or go on a spamming/trolling spree that will probably change, but I think they're usually safe otherwise.

I think that's how bigots usually see the world though. Their mindset, opinions and choices are the only valid ones and they seem to get them confused as fact a lot. As much as I dislike them and what they say, they still should be free to voice their opinions though (regarding self-moderation and the bigoted version of this thread that has spawned).

And thankfully it's probably the opposite. Most 'westerners' probably don't really care about homosexuals 'being in the 'public sphere' or are of the opinion that they deserve to be there as much as anyone else.