Interessante. Nao sabia disso. Que saco enviar arquivos hein!

Realmente o que mais me interessou no projeto foi o apoio do forum.

Supply infinito é sem dúvida um problema pra mim... mas Etehreum tb tem supply infinito...

They always are

As I read somewhere in Twitter: bitcoin allows You to do the transactions banks say you can't do.

Remittance services are far too expensive and bureaucratic. Bitcoin will kill those remittance services, or at least reduced their price to a more competitive price (like 0.30usd for a Swift, instead of 45 USD)

This always fascinated me as well.
Crisis are always coming , as there are always economic cycles. Bitcoin was created just after the last one.

The next economic crisis will be bitcoin's first.  It will probably react in a positive way, as it was created as an alternative to that cycles .

Ofc not 10million, but we can dream of 20k again in a more susteinable situation.

ERC-20 tokens are like coins. All those tokens from ICO are ERC-20 tokens. You can make transactions with them, send/receive, etc. They are fungible.
Fungible means they are all the same. If I have 1 BAT token, and you have one as well, they are both worth the same value. They are interchangeable.


ERC-721 are a little different. They are non-fungible. They are not interchangeable.

For example, the OP like cryptokitties. It is an ERC 721 token. He knows each of his kitties, and each one of his kitties (or tokens) are different from each other. Some of them are more valuable than others.
Take a look at some here for example. They are all ERC 721 tokens, but they are different. Maybe the black one is worth 10 times more than the other two.

All ERC-721 tokens are like that. Once you receive an ERC-721 token, it is there on the Ethereum blockchain forever.

I don´t think those kitties will be long term valuable.... they were valuable only when it was released, now the prices are just down AFAIK. There is no reason to pay a high amount of money on those kitties.

Yes. However I think that this is inevitable, as there are many people who will want to use bitcoin in the future, but are not willing to control private keys and deal with those security stuff (which is not easy for older people, or users who are not interested in new technologies).

There are many people who still struggle to use whatsapp or a smartphone. If there is a simple option for those people to use bitcoin, I think it´s a valid choice.



+1 to Samsung. South Korea is really a great place for cryptocurrency, good to see South Korean companies pushing on adoption!

Certainly. I was talking about this book, Sapiens,  where the authors talks about history of mankind since before Homo Sapiens.
He talks in much detail about the Agriculture Revolution. It changed mankind forever, as we were nomadic before that (hunters and gathers).

the agricultural revolution is what allowed the humanity form towns and cities. Having houses and a fixed location allowed us to develop lots of different tools, technologies, philosophy, political institutions...

however at the same time plagues became more common and our diet changed a lot. Hunters and gathers had a more diversified diet, with different fruits, seed, cereals, meat, fish, etc... 
with the advent of agriculture humanity began to consume little variety of food (too much corn for example). And plagues became more common.

Before the agriculture revolution, he talks about other revolution: The Cognitive revolution. When mankind began to form larger groups of people and some kind of organization, different from the other homo species.

This is very annoying. I do that too,as I use Ledger to store my coins and I have some ERC20.


The biggest problem I see is that MEW has many security flaws. Sadly there is no other trusted third party desktop software such a "Electrum for ethereum" to use...

I found those tips from MEW about security, i think they are important even for hardware wallet users:
https://myetherwallet.github.io/knowledge-base/security/myetherwallet-protips-how-not-to-get-scammed-during-ico.html

Only for spammers and bots.

Many users only need activity to rank up...

 You can post a lot and get merit faster, but you cannot get more activity (only until certain limit, 14 each 14 days)

It is very hard to think of one technology without setting specific parameters, such as last 30 years, 100 years, 1000 years...

Recently the most recent innovation that changed our lives was the smartphone.

Yesterday I was thinking that I spend too much time using my smartphone, so I would try to keep it at home tomorrow. But I use my smartphone to unlock a public bike that I have been using daily, so I cannot leave my house without my smartphone! The whole mankind is just staring at smartphones now.... that´s so crazy.

Smartphone wouldn't be anything without the internet, so I believe internet is really the "innovation" behind smartphones.

And of course, there would not be internet without electricity....


Certainly electricity changed humanity a lot, it even changed our sleeping habits, as people were then able to easily stay awake at night.

Achei essa aqui para quem nao tem campanha

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5069872.800;topicseen

Voce muda a assinatura e pode participar de uma loteria. Antigamente podia sem a assinatura... ganhei 0,01 btc  ja

Guys I will just close this topic.

I should just carry on of course. I shouldn't even think about this idea . Sorry

These two users just deleted two posts of mine in a self moderated topic. They are probably alts, as they are doing the same behavior and both posts were deleted in a very similar situation:

Butterscotch Cartman
turtletime


The posts were relevant to discussion, and were even quoted. The quoted text remained, as it was relevant to discussion. They were not great posts, but I find that very annoying.

I was thinking if there was anything to do. I just left a negative feedback (i am not a DT, so there is no harm to him, but its like an alert to other users). Maybe leaving a negative feedback is too harsh?
One of them is already tagged by owlcats for trolling anyway... lol

Just want to make a few comments for discussion, as some of those points are kind of cliché and not often discussed.

1. I think that hold mentality is not bad for adoption. Saving money is good, and people always saved money. It´s a kind of adoption IMO. The holder is just not spending the bitcoin now, but he is ready to if he wants.

2. Even though web wallets are not the safer option, they are good for adoption. Common people, especially older people (at their 50s for example) are much more used to an e-mail access than to a private key etc... BLockchain.info , for example, allowed thousands or even millions of users to create a simple wallet and use it. Ofc you will not put thousands of dollars there, but for a few bucks its perfectly fine. Easy to use, and great for newbies.
If somehow his wallet is hacked, it´s bad for adoption.... but if wallets such as Electrum were the only option, only a few crypto nerds would adopt bitcoin.

3. About this point, I will quote my own post:
If you are worried about blocktime, you can just buy some LTC. LTC is a BTC with one block per minute (basically). If you think that´s a game changer, LTC would be the way to go.


5. This is true, mainstream media is not a fan of bitcoin. I believe that with the advent of internet and social media networks mainstream media is losing its power. We just don´t need them anymore.

Take a look at what happened in US elections for example. Trump was cursed 24 hours a day by the media, and he won. Trump now just call mainstream media "Fake news" , refuses to answer their questions and talk direct to the people using his Twitter account.
We just lived the same situation now in Brazil. Bolsonaro (elected president) talked to people through facebook and youtube, as mainstream media was strongly against him.

Not just in politics, but in many other areas as well. I don´t even read mainstream media anymore, as I have plenty better options online.

I believe service discussion (altcoins) or service discussion (if you use BTC) would fit nice.

There is less spam in those boards compared to ANN session, so it would be a better option.

In Electrum it is very simple to do it. Just click in the Coin tab and choose which UTXO you want to spend (each of those dusts are going to be one UTXO individually).

It´s probably not worth claiming them, if there are too many transactions.

Maybe the best option would be to stop using that address and wallet.

Someone is tracking you. I think it would be a case to use a coin Mixer. Send all your funds from that wallet/address to a mixer a then move it to a fresh new wallet.

KYC procedure may be really a pain in the ass in those exchanges.

However 30 BTC is a very high investment and you should do everything the "right" way, without shortcuts. Buying from multiple sellers in localbitcoins may be an option. However, for all this amount of money I woulnd´t mind to do KYC. It may even protect yourself, in case there is any problem while buying.

Personally, i don't agree with this, and a guy painted red would not have that affect on my opinions about his points. Especially in politics discussions, which most of people already have their own opinions formed.

This argumentum ad hominem is a fallacy.  
If the tagged guy has a point in a discussion, personal attacks about his tag do not prove that his wrong, but only the opponent own inability to argue.

Not showing tags everyone on the forum because there a few incapable users is a non-sense to me.

Tags are used to mark users as scammers, not as fools. They are capable to argue and defend their views by themselves. Hiding tags because "they would not be able to prove their point if tagged" is like babysitting scammers. They are capable of defending themselves in discussions.

That´s exactly what happened to me.

I got 20+ consecutive wins by luck. I just got confident with my 200% gains and raised my bets.

Then I got busted in a 3-4 consecutive losses, which made me lose all my gains and my initial investment lol