Yea, this is why it makes very little sense for the OP to be conducting those auctions, as they seem to be a magnet for signature spammers. Not only that but they also seem to be a way for the OP to be trying to buy trust which is very concerning.

The OP really might as well either create a thread in games and rounds with a free .02 BTC, and/or come back as BPB and continue with his giveaways

LOL what? That would be a horrible idea. I think it should be fairly obvious that any collateral should be held by a trustworthy third party member of the forum.

So it looks like that MZ got roughly ~.02 BTC worth of alt coins for free

TBH the simplest transaction would be to simply give MZ .02 BTC as I somewhat doubt that he has very much interest in holding LTC and DRK

The bolded part is impossible for an escrow to determine. The escrow can check for loan requests and can example the PM history if requested as part of the escrow agreement, however the escrow will not have access to deleted PM's and deleted posts which is where it is most likely scam related activity will be located.

As I mentioned in a previous thread that he was asking for a loan in, there is a good chance that the OP is trying to use a banned account as collateral and that is the reason why he is not using that account to try to get a loan (another possibility is that the account has made posts filled with giveaway and similar posts which would degrade it's value)

People have scammed for .001 BTC in the past so the low amount does give me any confidence that you are going to repay the loan. I think it is fairly certain that you are not going to repay the loan and are simply trying to unload it in an unethical way. As I mentioned previously the account you are posting from is not at risk of receiving any kind negative trust as whoever lend you the btc will likely simply take over the member account when you default.

Why don't you PM me from the account that you are trying to use as collateral? If you cannot do this then the account is likely banned

This probably wouldn't be a good idea considering the fact that he is pretty clearly trying to sell the account in question as well as the fact that there are multiple neutral warnings against him

If you are giving a member account as collateral then when (not if) you default then marco will simply take control of the account and attempt to sell it. The fact that you are requesting the loan from this account and not from the actual account you are giving as collateral raises additional red flags as it would be difficult to tell what the accounts posting history looks like (e.g. is it full of giveaways)

Are you sure you aren't trying to sell the account to him? If you are flexible on the amount/interest amount like that then the chances of this being a sale are very high.

Additionally you are proposing similar loans in various other lending threads which increases the skepcism

I have long stopped marking obvious ponzi's as ponzis because doing so has not been effective. Additionally marking obvious ponzis as a pony has diluted the effect of negative trust left by me which resulted in people ignoring the warnings that I had left.

I had noted in the escrow agreement that the site was a likely scam so anyone considering advertising for them would be able to determine if they wished to advertise for them accordingly

Their anon nature makes it very difficult to determine if it is appropriate to trust them or not. While they have been very successful in the past it is not possible to know who is behind them or if they are actually not keeping records of their customers.

Additionally they had mentioned engaging in several actives in the past that could have resulted in them losing large amounts of bitcoin which could make them undercapitalized. For example they had mentioned that they might consider washing several hundred BTC via various exchanges to further distort the source of coins received by bit mixer however late last year bitstamp stopped allow  people who had not completed identity verification to withdraw funds, there was even a scam accusation opened against them by a very new user. 

It would also be very difficult to know if the government had seized their private keys/servers which would allow the government to easily see both the input and output addresses of their customers.

Blazr is too smart to be BFL_josh. They also live in different countries/continents/extremely distant time zones.

It looks like you answered your own question over 24 hours ago:
Please stop trolling

I assume this to mean that post count =/= activity.....this is correct?

Also is your hero status timeframe correct or is it a latest possible based on the above stats?

And finally, is it possible to reach hero status just by making ~8 posts, or does the account not yet have at least the 85 required posts to reach the 480 posts it needs to get hero status?

If they have not yet been approved and it will be several months before they will be done so then you will most likely receive lower offers to lend with them as collateral as even if you receive a legal opinion that they will be granted that does not mean the government bureaucracy will do so.

As a general rule, most lenders will want at least 120% worth of collateral of the repayment amount if the collateral can easily and quickly be sold. However based on your description, neither of these will apply so lenders would likely want a higher ratio of collateral to repayment amount.

I would encourage any potential lender to do their due diligence prior to funding the loan and ensuring that the collateral is properly secured.

Collateral? If you don't have any then don't even bother responding and just lock this thread.

It is 0/unconfirmed right now, however I am sure that it will confirm. Thanks for the quick repayment.

I will leave trust for you.

Received via txid 1da01af8cef6f7b208acaa1089c90ceddc0bd9df1f9049ad5bc5ff349f12a54c


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

This is quickseller from bitcointalk toady is April 17 2015.

The loan to BtcCrazy1 has been funded via txid b1b11e3fe540be1ce7dfb689e1f07144565739be7ddf64477b3e40a235637f27

Please repay .06 btc to 1FbUoscUZNkZbJ3ZPZ4oeqN1jBQmAyLUPM by April 20 2015. An output of .01 btc was sent to the repayment address as part of the tx that funded the loan. Thanks.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJVMaysAAoJEFMt0pDwvrUWQLIH/jCMdi2zP5ei5lexT9wW+Svd
pv8czotOG9tDni4kM5RVhXT08EYIBKfDsgIpmblhFnaIbW6Z/RvSvjgDBBzR/6oN
4Up7tBTWaaqhlZemOHxtAzm8Ad+GltHIG4GPw+LDiB4W+L2hfqfVSi68KDTnZCzN
Iqbs1hsYrG/9z1XIbzY767NnJiO9Q+dRrJZuoHATr23fm13s6BJsLlDeXhb+VvFb
BSjrE9gE9rhO47ZUCq5AjhPjeWWU1k0BR6+lwAPE3fI7STl1xUEgWTcBj8zssHyN
lFj86jtGJ9bUDBPrQ1io08MqED3INEvaM6I7ENN07N5D/bVWimFj9TpeUOSFS/c=
=3gzc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

You sent me a PM to send .85 BTC to an address which you did not enroll with, which I am obviously not going to do and as a result your PM was ignored. I will take the above post as a rejection of my offer to be able to remove your signature early for a partial payment in order to you be able to avoid continuing to advertise for a site that has scammed. Your posts will be evaluated based on the escrow agreement at the end of the payment period.

Your other concerns have been addressed above in this thread or are not relevant.

I would accept 10 DRK as collateral for a .05 BTC loan, however if the value of the 10 DRK were to fall below .065 BTC then I would reserve the right to sell it to cover the loan, so if you provided 15 DRK then you would be more protected against a decline in DRK's value.

You can go ahead and send 10 DRK (or 15 DRK if you so choose) to XcunbkJkxWSULLa34Zgqct6mKYDDekYyLH and after 3 confirmations I will fund your loan.

How much dash can you offer?