Bitcoin Forum
June 17, 2024, 02:02:31 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 [557] 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 »
11121  Economy / Speculation / Re: Lets start rally! on: September 06, 2011, 01:35:55 PM
Free fall has started after some resistance in 6.5-6.8$ channel
The volume has jumped considerably.

Last Price: 6.18High:7.964Low: 6.13Volume: 74635


I am glad I got caught in traffic this morning. I was going to buy at 6.6. I got in at 6.18.

But I think there will be another dip this afternoon, then a correction up close to 8.
11122  Economy / Speculation / Re: What's causing BTC price to dip below $7? (Answer inside) on: September 06, 2011, 01:20:14 PM
3 days in a row people can't add money to the exchanges to buy BTC. It's not surprising the price drops. I expect a nice rally this week.
Except it's tuesday, and the price keeps falling. That weekend excuse got old a long time ago. Traders have been aware of it for months, so the price goes up in the weekend about as often as it goes down.

Dwolla does not usually post funding to MtGox until the end of the day.

And I am guessing that a lot of people were not taking the time to put money into their accounts on the Friday before labor day weekend.

11123  Bitcoin / Project Development / Bitcoin central funding and distribution program on: September 06, 2011, 01:36:32 AM
I have a high level concept I am trying to figure out.

tl;dr

Create a program where multiple people can put their money into a single wallet unaccessible by anyone with criteria for when and where it will disperse payments.



tl part:
Distribution
I was thinking of several different scenarios. You can set the time of distribution, say once a week, month, year etc...or once it hits X amount, or you could have all of the people who donated vote on the distribution. You can set the vote to be 1-100% required to distribute with a threshold of sending the money back to the donors if there is no resolution by X day.

Consider a mixed group of people wanting to support cancer research. They donate to this cancer wallet and it is set up to activate either at 1000 BTC, with a vote of 66% for the location of where the 1000 BTC will be sent. If there is no resolution within two months, the BTC is sent back equally to the donors.

Or a neighborhood wants to build a park in an open lot so all of the neighbors put BTC into the park wallet. They come up with a few different ideas and companies and require a 51% acceptance for distribution. Once they get a vote of 51% then the money is sent. Otherwise it either has a date where the money is given back or it is kept there until there is agreement.

Or a club that has dues where the members get to vote on where the money goes.

The Program
This I am not too sure about. The hard part is having a wallet that is not accessible by anyone but the program. The person or server in control of the program could possibly be the weak link there. I do not want to rely on trust. There needs to be a lot of transparency and easy verification.

I could use some suggestions on this. Thanks.
11124  Economy / Speculation / Re: the further decentralisation of the bitcoin markets. on: September 06, 2011, 12:40:08 AM
I was wondering about this. Will we be able to buy and sell other currencies?
11125  Economy / Speculation / Re: What percentage loss have you taken speculating on bitcoin so far? on: September 06, 2011, 12:31:05 AM
I am down about ~35%.

I got in in early July when it "came down" to $14.25.

Had I stayed in I would be down almost 50% but I have been jumping in and out based on watching things.

I have a target amount of BTC though and will do small trading until I reach that goal. It has gone up since I started so I am pleased.

Looking long term I know it will go up quite a bit in the long term.
11126  Economy / Speculation / Re: Why BTC is losing value. on: September 06, 2011, 12:07:06 AM
Where did you get that statistic?

Bitcoin at 50% inflation:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3105.0
11127  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Decentralized internet - and what it could mean For Bitcoin on: September 05, 2011, 11:53:50 PM
Each node should not care whether the packet is coming from a wireless connection or a wire connection or even a connection through the Internet.

I think if each node was paid based on packets transferred then people would be encouraged to come up with easy/fast transfer of data.

I considered using Bitcoin to pay per packet but I think as the Bitcoin value increases and amount of packets passing through a network increases, you would have to come up with a way to raise and lower prices on your node and have the network automatically find the cheapest route. Maybe even having a setting on your browser to pay extra for increased speed if you want.
11128  Economy / Speculation / Re: Why BTC is losing value. on: September 05, 2011, 11:02:49 PM
Except that Bitcoin is at a 50% inflation right now.

Gold is also a deflationary currency and yet its price is skyrocketing.

But if people were mining gold faster than people were buying it, it too would be losing value.
11129  Economy / Speculation / Re: Major buying opportunity? on: September 05, 2011, 07:29:08 PM
Do not expect major buying on a labor day holiday when all of the banks are closed and Dwolla is not sending money to people's accounts.

Even if it was a regular Monday, the money does not go in until 5PM EDT.

You have another day to wait for the week's trading to begin.
11130  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Beyond Bitcoin: Decentralising other public institutions on: September 03, 2011, 09:12:29 PM
I had an idea for a distributed wireless Internet where each user is also an ISP.

You basically run your computer and allow relay of traffic over your wireless network. You get paid for the amount of packets that come through your network and you pay for using the network. This would encourage people to soup up their transceivers to get as much traffic to pass through their node. It would also give incentive to websites to provide content that would get a lot of traffic outside of advertising.

This would eliminate ISPs, government interference with ISPs, censorship, etc.
11131  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Insane amount of bitcoins on: September 01, 2011, 02:34:26 PM
I bought 1,000,000 BTC throughout the day yesterday in anticipation of her buying 800,000 Bitcoins.

Has Maria put in her purchase yet?

I have some shopping I need to do this weekend so I might have to sell it all before the end of the day if she was lying.
11132  Economy / Speculation / Where is the floor? on: September 01, 2011, 02:19:46 PM
Bitcoin has gotten back on track of dropping about a dollar a week which was shortly interrupted by the hype of the convention which turned out to be nothing.

The price will probably keep going down until there is enough interest to counter the 50% inflation.

I believe that when the mining reward goes to 25 in 2012 and inflation is cut in half then we will be able to maintain and slowly rise in price from there on with fluctuations.

But until then, it will continue to fall.

So where is the floor?
11133  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Input Requested for Possible Bitcoin Convention on: August 30, 2011, 09:33:36 PM
From the judgement of the users on this forum it should probably be in some Amish town in Indiana.
11134  Economy / Economics / Re: Ron Paul and Bitcoin on: August 30, 2011, 06:34:06 PM
It is pretty much Ron Paul winning in 2012 or the United States will go Bust.

The question is, how will a United States filled with rioting and destruction affect Bitcoin?

If Ron Paul is elected he may be able to slow the destruction if it is not too late.

As for me, I have already started planning my escape. I have very little faith in my fellow Americans to make the right decision this time around.

Their track record is horrible.
11135  Bitcoin / Meetups / Re: EUROPEAN BITCOIN CONFERENCE 2011, PRAGUE NOV 25-27 on: August 30, 2011, 06:12:13 PM
They probably want it in Prague because of the prevalent sex trade..

http://www.rferl.org/content/article/1060878.html


sorry...I just could not help myself..
11136  Other / Off-topic / Re: Moderated Bitcoin Forums? on: August 30, 2011, 06:07:12 PM
Are there any good moderated forums for bitcoin that people can recommend?  I don't really like the thought of someone having that kind of control over forum postings, but this forum has degenerated to the point where I think such a forum is an unfortunate necessity.  And, btw, this kind of thing is not unique to bitcoin.  Almost every community that achieves some degree of popularity has to take such steps at some point.  I would also recommend shutting this forum down (an action that I think, while unfortunate, is probably in the best interest of bitcoin).

Yes, because everyone loves being moderated.

You belong in 1984.
11137  Other / Off-topic / Re: Can we stop now? on: August 30, 2011, 06:04:22 PM
while aloowing the continued planning of Bitcoin trips and conferences to a city known for the very crime the scandal is about.

They need to just go ahead and plan the conference for Vegas...or Chicago!
11138  Other / Off-topic / Re: Can we stop now? on: August 30, 2011, 05:12:07 PM
Stop Bitcoin?
11139  Economy / Speculation / Re: Is bitcoin soon to begin its death drop again? I feel it coming. on: August 26, 2011, 06:36:52 PM
The 8.5 wall fell! I am shocked!!!

 Shocked
11140  Economy / Speculation / Re: 8/25/11 Speculation Thread on: August 25, 2011, 07:18:17 PM
Has MtGox frozen?
Pages: « 1 ... 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 [557] 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!