Why? I only see 3 options here. #1 bitcoin devs did slip malware in the code, what do you expect them to do if you tell them you found it? Confess? #2 bitcoin devs did not slip malware in the code, its a false positive. Contacting them is useless, because they cant change the situation. Contact the anti virus vendor instead.#3 bitcoin devs did not slip malware in the code, its not a false positive. Verifiying you are downloading the real thing solves this without contacting anyone. |
|
|
|
Old news. AVs have constantly been flagging Bitcoin Core as a virus. Just check the hashes and signatures to verify your install is legit and then add it to your AVs exception list. That text ... "not a virus", "bitcoin miner". |
|
|
|
Yes! I'm able to do it, I don't use that wallet currently because it was an old version of multibit, but I still have it installed and it's accessible for me  I've already contacted Theymos with the info, what should I do to "sign" using that address? For how to sign see the thread linked by actmyname above, for what to sign see here -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=497545.0 |
|
|
|
nvm, didn't see the second link you posted 0100000001d5fdcc541e25de1c7a5addedf24858b8bb665c9f36ef744ee42c316022c90f9b24809 f088a47304402201ae4517dbebd5b082e199b70651afc878435e708e416936f9a336853abbbf0f1 022039285ef581ab8cb95fdc2b0a9bc3ad14740e3224bf24d7b0dc0143975b67651201410408a03 23173d656a66cab860631911c9f9c3ecc5187972731c8774eb1726fe890f709c85537882ad9df4a d661752d2d0544f593eea04304d3f7cc43c088b3176dffffffff016601cd1d0000000017a9141bb 6e4d8b5b219551ac32c97406b8e7f757fc34d8700000000 this is the raw transaction ID Thanks, this is the decoded version: {
"txid": "5a55795b6ffdd62f04c98eff2f424d13356844eed3e141b5e268244360cc657a",
"hash": "5a55795b6ffdd62f04c98eff2f424d13356844eed3e141b5e268244360cc657a",
"size": 221,
"vsize": 221,
"version": 1,
"locktime": 0,
"vin": [
{
"txid": "9b0fc92260312ce44e74ef369f5c66bbb85848f2eddd5a7a1cde251e54ccfdd5",
"vout": 144670756,
"scriptSig": {
"asm": "304402201ae4517dbebd5b082e199b70651afc878435e708e416936f9a336853abbbf0f1022039285ef581ab8cb95fdc2b0a9bc3ad14740e3224bf24d7b0dc0143975b676512[ALL] 0408a0323173d656a66cab860631911c9f9c3ecc5187972731c8774eb1726fe890f709c85537882ad9df4ad661752d2d0544f593eea04304d3f7cc43c088b3176d",
"hex": "47304402201ae4517dbebd5b082e199b70651afc878435e708e416936f9a336853abbbf0f1022039285ef581ab8cb95fdc2b0a9bc3ad14740e3224bf24d7b0dc0143975b67651201410408a0323173d656a66cab860631911c9f9c3ecc5187972731c8774eb1726fe890f709c85537882ad9df4ad661752d2d0544f593eea04304d3f7cc43c088b3176d"
},
"sequence": 4294967295
}
],
"vout": [
{
"value": 4.99974502,
"n": 0,
"scriptPubKey": {
"asm": "OP_HASH160 1bb6e4d8b5b219551ac32c97406b8e7f757fc34d OP_EQUAL",
"hex": "a9141bb6e4d8b5b219551ac32c97406b8e7f757fc34d87",
"reqSigs": 1,
"type": "scripthash",
"addresses": [
"34DZGR6o7cPkAbUoV3TVDyuVtjkhRMWw9w"
]
}
}
]
}
The TXID under "vin" is -> 9b0fc92260312ce44e74ef369f5c66bbb85848f2eddd5a7a1cde251e54ccfdd5 which is the coinbase from block 2 -> https://blockchain.info/tx/9b0fc92260312ce44e74ef369f5c66bbb85848f2eddd5a7a1cde251e54ccfdd5It tries to spend output number 144670756, which does not exist, the transaction has a single output (number 0). You would also pay ~45 BTC in fees as the input is 50 BTC and the output you create 4.9974502 BTC. Not that it matters on an invalid transaction.
Maybe it would be better to import the private key into electrum instead. There might be a bug with the sweep method. |
|
|
|
|
Did you report the false positive to kaspersky?
|
|
|
|
Do you still control this address and can sign a message with it? Que lastima, me tenía fé  Felicidades a marticps! Mi bitcoin address es: 15f2ZprZrs5yjNmZWee2o7kcTzAmYFihPi Grán concurso!
Ill leave a negative rating on zinodaur's account without further proof, because a large number of posts have been edited to only show dots. |
|
|
|
If the explanation of Abdussamad is clear and helpful, it could remains a problem, Electrum allows to generate "manually" more new addresses, imagine 100 news empy ones . I send one different to each of my 100 "future customers" from my e-shop, naturally only 30% among them will really buy and send money... as I can't manage the order of the real "actives addresses" it's possible than more than 20 consecutives adresses remains unused so when restoring from the seed, Electrum will stop as soon as 20 empty addresses are found... YES  NO ? By default, yes. and if YES what about the "orphans addresses" (number 55 to 100) lost for ever??? If that's the way... people must be awarded  No, no addresses are every lost. There is a "gap_limit" which defaults to 20. Thus the wallet stops after 20 empty addresses. Usually its not a good idea to modify this value. If you however used the wallet as a merchant you should increase the value to e.g. 1000 when you restore a commercially used wallet from seed. |
|
|
|
Danke euch beiden.
Ich denke mal es gibt keine möglichkeit die selbe wallet auf dem smartphone so wie auf dem rechner zu haben ohn einen service anbieter oder?
Hat Electrum nicht jetzt auch ne Android App? Hab das noch nicht versucht, aber ich würde meinen das der Seed bei beiden funktioniert. Ist natürlich auch wieder ein Risiko. Ist eins der Geräte kompromittiert bringt dir das andere auch nichts mehr. |
|
|
|
Hallo zusammen, ich wollte da electrum bei mir immer 1-2 blöcke seit neustem hinten nach hinkt und ich electrum eigendlich eh nur als anfangslösung (seit mittlerweile 1,5 jahren) nutzen wollte habe ich mir überlegt meine wallet um zu ziehen. und zwar habe ich da an die wallet von https://blockchain.info/ gedacht. nun habe ich dazu ein paar fragen: -ist meine wahl eine gute wahl? Meiner Meinung nach nicht. Blockchain.info ist eine Wallet als Service, das heißt du bist abhängig vom Betreiber und wenn mal was nicht läuft vom Support abhängig. Das klingt für mich eher nach Rückschritt als nach einer Verbesserung gegenüber Electrum. -wenn ich das richtig verstanden habe ist das eine webwallet, kann ich dann die selbe wallet auch mit der Andriod app nutzen?
Das weiß ich nicht. -Kann ich meine addressen "mitnehmen" oder muss ich die überall ändern und die beträge mir auf die neue wallet senden?
danke schonmal im vorraus
RTW-93
Ja kannst du. Die neue Version von Blockchain.info arbeitet auch mit einem Seed. Die importierten Adressen sind dann aber natürlich nicht durch den Seed abgedeckt. Du solltest also ein extra Backup der privaten Schlüssel machen. Dabei kann natürlich auch was schief gehen, von daher ist die sicherste Variante immer eine (oder mehrere) Transaktionen zu machen. |
|
|
|
This forums seriously needs a revamp. I really recommend XenForo. There are tons of features and it looks really nice. Tons of sites use it. Its just what this site needs! For a sites that makes BTC10 or BTC50 on a donation.... this will be quite cheap. https://xenforo.com - (default themed preview) ttps://xenforo.com/community/ Maybe you should have read the section first. There already is a custom written new forum software in beta. |
|
|
|
But, it means the user have to import the private key from bitcoin core to Mycelium. Yes, if it must be a specific address. There is no other way to sign a message but with a private key. Also, increasing the risks the bitcoin funds stolen because the wallet stored in multiple places.
A single private key is enough and it would be a good idea to not use the address again. |
|
|
|
I'm trying to import btc from my armory wallet but I'm getting a bad-txns-inputs-spent error. https://i.imgur.com/AlBGprE.pngI have no idea why it won't accept this, the coins are still in that address now but it refuses to import them. Anybody know why? Can you paste the raw or decoded transaction here? Essentially the content of file you used to transfer the TX from armory to electrum. The error suggests that you attempt a double spend on a confirmed transaction. |
|
|
|
Maybe he went to Full Member and saw a lot of his posts deleted and was able to keep the avatar ?
That is also a possibility. If you look into their post history, you can see a fair amount of posts are just '.' (second page). This means that the user has likely edited their posts. Those eventually get reported and deleted making their activity drop (unless they create new posts). Wel,, I think we found the reason for that strangeness. So you confirm that if some Full Member lose its rank, he will keep its avatar ? IIRC Heros even keep their rank when their activity drops below the Hero requirement. |
|
|
|
-snip-
Well the bans did not give me a chance
Wait, what? Multiple bans are not enough to give you a hint something is not working out right? and I was banned for lifetime without any warning signals.
You had several accounts banned, what exactly would be an appropriate warning sign in your opinion? This screwed me up but when I started posting some good posts then I went as far as a Sr. Member. I am mot sure about the negative trusts you are saying other than these two.
Again, this is not difficult to figure out. Look at your own profile. Carefully, you will likely find the trust page and the untrusted feedback section. But seems like the trust system is for abusers here. I can correct my mistakes, others can not.
Can you? Can you undo all the spam your other accounts did? Show me. Having multiple accounts should not be a problem unless all are active at the same time.
Multiple accounts are not a problem, even if they are active at the same time, as long as they follow the rules. If a guy is evading a ban due to lack of quality posts and if he learns the same with time and becomes a Sr. Member then it should really not be a problem and should be considered a special case.
Why? Why should there be an exception for you? What have you done for this board to justify the exception? Right now I have a nagging feeling Im talking to a child or a troll. You either are unable to find very basic information or unwilling. Your moral compas is way off if you dont understand why "gifts" or "donations" towards people in power are forbidden in most countries. |
|
|
|
-snip-
Is that site even legit?
I dont know. I see no SSL encryption
They use a self signed cert -> https://bitcoinbarrel.com/ (results in an interesting error though) which usually means that if a site is about earning bitcoins, its a fake as you should always transfer BTC over SSL.
What? The? Fuck? Bitcoins are transfered over the Bitcoin network, all transaction data is publicly available. You need to change your name or step up your game. |
|
|
|
You answered your own question actually... yes ask all senders to sign their sends.
Can you please tell me how it's done? I'm not very good at this, as you can probably tell. -snip- I guess the subtle hint was not enough. CLICK HERE TO LEARN HOW TO SIGN A MESSAGE WITH VARIOUS WALLETS, HOW TO PRESENT THE MESSAGE TO OTHERS AND WHICH WALLETS DO NOT ALLOW YOU TO SIGN -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=990345.0 |
|
|
|
Well DT1 must be Default Trust . I do not understand one thing . If Lutpin and Lauda delete their feedbacks, will I be still left with negative ratings ?
Yes, you also have negative ratings by actmyname, yahoo62278 and FlossinRod. And if they delete their trust ratings, will I be able to use this forum again without getting permanent ban?
These two are unrelated. You can have the best positive rating you can imagine, if you break the rules you still get banned. And what is the question you are asking Shorena ?
I asked how long was the ban you got. Its usually stated with the ban message. A 7 day ban is considered a first warning, a 30 day usually the last chance before you get banned for life. |
|
|
|
-snip-
You have got no intention to do so means are you bound by the rules of that DT1 users thing ?
No Lutpin (and Lauda) is on the default trust network on level 2 below Blazed. This means Blazed gives their ratings power while yours will most likely be ignored by most. Blazed could remove the power, not the rating. If I am already banned then why am I able to post on this forum ?
Slow moderation most likely, or maybe your ban isnt permanent? You didnt answer that yet. If a person is jailed, he can drift to another country and if that person behaves well there are lesser chances of him getting abused by the world .
Only after(!) they have served their term. If your term is for life, you need to talk to the gods about a chance afterwards. What does DT1 user mean ?
Can you give me the Blazed profile link ?
Id suggest you figure this out on your own, its not that difficult. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
