Also, if your personal address is revealed, what's going to happen?
If my personal address/identity is released then anyone who I have stolen from can pursue legal action against me. Considering that the list of people that I have stolen from is empty this is not a reason to release to release the personal information of someone. It is also possible that people that are upset that I prevented from being able to steal from others would make attempts to harass me. I can understand your fear but while being on the internet, it often happens that our personal information gets leaked. If not Vod, someone else can trace you or anyone and not even disclose their name. Who will you sue in that case and do you think it's worth the effort? It's only those scammers who can cause any harm but they also wouldn't care unless some of them have criminal minds to harass anyone. Looks like Vod wants to close this matter here and I hope you too do the same. This forum can be peaceful again then  |
|
|
|
I think that both of them have stepped over the line. One party has threatened to sue and now the other party is hunting him back. Honestly I expected something like this. I've been telling someone that this situation will escalate further, which it did. I said it was a possibility that legal action would be taken if he did not stop libeling my reputation. Him calling me a scammer (which is untrue) would cause people who I have traded with to release my information to scammers, which appears to have happened considering that someone gave up the return address that I have been using to send packages to several people, an address I can't receive mail to. The way things are going he is probably going to be facing action from that Cody guy, possibly from CVS and maybe worse. I was able to find multiple social media profiles of what appears to be the person he released information on and it appears to be a real person. The issue is how does he know 100% that that guy is QS?
Good question. He was tricked by someone into thinking that was me and he did not do proper research. You can't sue anyone for calling you a scammer. Has he threatened you or blackmailed you? Also, it seems you both don't belong to the same jurisdiction which makes your claims of suing him completely invalid. I really dint expect Vod to do such an immature thing after you threatened him. It doesn't make Vod nor you look responsible as you both are making a personal attack on each other. Also, if your personal address is revealed, what's going to happen? |
|
|
|
how much btc u have? you accept any escrow? and how to trust you already im scammed in localbitcoins... where you from in india
I have 0.0749 BTC. I accept escrow on the forum (you will need to pay the fee if any else I will use https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=320943). I am from Mumbai. Do you want to pay via PM/Bank transfer |
|
|
|
|
I don't think Vod would go to that extent but anyways, QS is no where innocent. He took 20BTC from TF to sue and file a case against Vod which proves that he started all this chaos. Why should one pity QS when he has dug his own grave? He should stop being immature and just stop running after people just because he was caught doing a shady transaction.
I don't support either in this case.
|
|
|
|
Congratulations Badbear |
|
|
|
<snip> If the person sponsoring the sold account still trusts the ratings of that account then there would be no reason to remove them.
You do this a lot: type in English but make no sense. He's saying that if the person who bought the account trusts the people the previous owner trusted, there's no reason to remove those ratings that are left by original owner. I got that, but since the account in question was on DT afaik, that only goes half way, because the new owner has the ability to leave ratings that are considered trusted, w/o "earning" that ability.So it's a no-go on this one. DT account's - by forum rules or not, should definitely not be traded and remain on DT. (imho none should, but DT is where the line must be drawn) cheers That's why the DT level 2 members should be removed and there should just be a level 1 with the mos trusted members (who shouldn't sell their accounts atleast). By having over 50 members in the list 2, any random guy can just buy a DT account and mark negative ratings while the person who has added him might not even know whether the account is sold. These DT members from list 2 then go about threatening others about their reputation. It is not against any rules to sell your account. If the person sponsoring the sold account still trusts the ratings of that account then there would be no reason to remove them.
The main reason is the original owner has sold the account. Such an obvious and valid REASON. |
|
|
|
Did anyone receive their BTC?
No. I'm still waiting for the payment  |
|
|
|
I haven't receive my payment also where is camelson? He must be busy. When he comes online, he'll surely pay |
|
|
|
Submitted my review 2 days ago. Waiting for the payment |
|
|
|
|
You can earn it by doing freelance jobs on websites like Coinality, Bit Task, CoinDesk Jobs and BitcoinTalk Services Board.
Faucets and Signature Campaigns also are good but in the former you need to have too many referrals to make this amount while Signature Campaigns are risky if you join them only to earn and not to contribute to the community.
|
|
|
|
|
People need to check the untrusted feedback as well before trading. Also, those who are on DT list should check QS's ratings and mark a negative on those accounts they consider as scammers which I guess should be done soon.
|
|
|
|
I would like to add few more earning methods from my end:
1. Services:
In this section, members post bounty options for those who can help them either in programming or any other task (eg: a signup on a website, forum posts and so on). This job can get a person earning irrespective of his account rank.
2. Digital Goods/Goods:
Here the members can sell their digital goods like gift cards or physical goods and earn BTC. A simple a safe method.
Also in the Faucets section, kindly write that it's a low earning method. Also if possible, rank the options as per the earning capability. I feel Signature Campaigns pay higher than the other options but that's my POV.
Would you recommend always using escrow when selling gift cards and other goods? Not exactly as an Escrow also can't give a guarantee that the gift card may be valid after a week/month. It does happen that gift cards work when they are purchased but get cancelled after a period of time. But for NEWBIES only, it's better to use an escrow for a digital gift card to make sure the newbie doesn't get scammed and the buyer as well gets a working gift card. |
|
|
|
|
Ever since the Forum has been under a DDoS attack, even I'm receiving these ponzi scam emails. Report them to Google so that the sender's account is blocked.
|
|
|
|
Why is selling account bad? What if you get one as a loan collateral?
I don't lend any money nor do I care about receiving any accounts as collateral. It's an unethical thing to do IMO and people scam using bought accounts. Hence I consider it bad but the forum allows it. |
|
|
|
Vod on the other hand has mostly left reasonable ratings (though sometimes I feel they are unfair) but he comes out to be a responsible member definitely more deserving than you. He and TC have been considerate while leaving ratings which makes them both deserving of the DT trust list. You should take a look at a few of the threads created about Vod. He has a history of trolling those who he does not agree with. If you look at his recent post history you can see just how reasonable he can be when someone is trying to discuss a rating with him. You will also see how he responds to factual arguments. I know he does get into an argument but I've also seen many instances when he has removed the ratings. Everyone isn't perfect and hence his trolling behavior can be ignored (as many here inhibit this same behavior). Rest there is no other reason why he shouldn't be on the DT trust list as he hasn't scammed anyone whom I know of nor has been involved in a shady trade/transaction. You should infact apologize to the members whom you have acted as an escrow while dealing with them using your alts. This was done a long time ago - nearly a week. Both of these people told me they did not feel it was a scam, and neither of them said they had any hard feelings.
Am glad you did it |
|
|
|
Still arguing about this? Keep digging deeper.  Someone wiser than me implied a few months ago that QS was running a long con..... I suspect he was caught before pulling it off. Everyone knows he has alternate accounts selling them. is this true quickseller? QS said he doesn't sell accounts anymore some time ago, and more than once Up to you believe him or not He still sells accounts as last month only I guess he had mentioned it on the forum that he sold a DT account. May be after this incident he'll stop or may continue via his alt/s account/s. |
|
|
|
|
What's the point of bumping this thread? He can NEVER be a MOD now (atleast if the forum needs to be in a TRUSTWORTHY member's hands then he won't be appointed as one).
|
|
|
|
Congratulations LaudaM I had seen the MOD badge yesterday itself though. |
|
|
|
|
Pm me the details when you reopen this offer.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
