one particular reason i bought FPGA shares is because of the small total amount of shares (6000 )
releasing more shares not good
would it make you feel better if we all had half as many shares (3000 in summa) and the price was twice as high as it is now?
|
|
|
Talking about how much support is at 1.00 and how it can never stay that low is foolish, because it's not like it will only get near it once then bounce straight back up never to come down again. Sure the first time it gets near a dollar there will be lots of buys, but what about the second time, third time? Same thing is happening now. Last time the price was this low there was quite a bit of support with a decent rally back up to 3.70ish. The price falls again, and the people who would have bought in have bought in already, and there is very little support left.
In case you're answering to me: that's why I said: "this year" it well not go below $1 for more than an hour.
|
|
|
Pet Rock Anyone? (NMC)
Personally I believe NMC has as much or greater real-world use potential as BTC. I think the idea of a decentralized naming system is revolutionary and amazing, and could enable the concept of smart property. As to the OP, I'm currently betting on $1.65. agreed disagreed, it will Never go below 2$. Not even for a minute?
|
|
|
3 targets for me:
1.77 BUY 1.54 Strong BUY 1.24 super Strong BUY
i don't think it will go any deeper than 1.24 at no time. everyone is talking agbout the 1-mark, so i doubt it will ever reach it, cause everybodsy will buy like mad if it should even only touch 1.1
100% speculation, i mostly use s3020 suggestions on elliot waves.
I think you mean S3052 ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) But yes, me too, and I have been very satisfied lately. Have you guys subscribed to his investment letter?
|
|
|
Pet Rock Anyone? (NMC)
Personally I believe NMC has as much or greater real-world use potential as BTC. I think the idea of a decentralized naming system is revolutionary and amazing, and could enable the concept of smart property. As to the OP, I'm currently betting on $1.65. .bit is cool, no doubt. However: I somehow doubt it will ever find it's place in widespread use, because there is just not enough incentive. The current system, however flawed, works well enough for most. And the fears some have about lack of freedom and/or too much control over the names are too abstract and far out for most to have large scale effect. Also: adoption of .bit by big providers seems unlikely... why should they? Without that, I don't see widespread adoption either. And also: The world will have a SCREAMING NEED for SOUND MONEY very SOON. Bitcoin (as well as NMC) _is_ sound money. That need is far greater and more important than a good decentralized system to lookup ip addresses. So if BTC has usefulness 1.0, NMC has usefulness 1.00000000001. So what you say is true, NMC has greater real-world use potential than BTC. However, as I just explained, that is largely irrellevant: BTC clearly has the first-mover advantage and there can only be one big currency like this. So unless one of the OtherCoins offers some really useful innovation, the internet currency will be called Bitcoin.
|
|
|
Just curious as to your thoughts on this recent decline in trading price. Manipulated? Bound to happen, nature of Bitcoin? Are we heading to $1.00 BTC soon ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) Thanks for your insights. SJ It's not going below $1 for more than an hour this year, is my prediction. Why? because there is insane support at $1. How do I know? Because many people (me too) say they would buy at $1 very big and I believe them. I think bitcoin is undervalued. The market should normally take into consideration future expectation. Bitcoin is very high risk, but the reward in case it becomes widely used even within just a sector or certain populous is extreme. Todays uncertain times should free some FIAT looking for places to go. Maybe such high risk is just not a popular place in fearful times. Maybe bitcoins trust got damaged more heavily than I thought by the bad news since June. As far as "fundamentals" go: it seems the economy is not growing rapidly yet, but look at all the developments on the technical side and infrastructure support businesses popping up, exchanges professionalizing. The infrastructure is being built and remember: we're still in the "initial big inflation" phase. This all takes time, but it happens. I'm not trying to talk the price up, but it might well be that "Q4 2011" will be used in sentences like: "Early adopters that got into bitcoin in Q4 2011". Don't miss out ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
's hard to avoid paying things in Euros, really, when you live in Europe…
come to my place, I will proxy buy everything for you if you give me silver, gold or bitcoin ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
Stocks involving gold mining require more research since you have to look at each individual company and their management. But either gold or gold mining stock is a good buy right now. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) in this very interesting interview http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSyJjC_jBWQ Doug Casey talks about "junior" miners. I think he says 80% of them will never mine a gram of metal. However, he also says junior miners are a good investment.
|
|
|
I disagree on nearly all points. Gold is not rallying, stocks are not floundering. I am long a small position in a miner, as well as physical gold, but I consider both to be a hold at best.
i totally agree. i put up some very illuminating charts illustrating this on my website. shouldn't an ad like that be done like this: "i totally agree. i put up some very illuminating charts illustrating this on my website." (I hope the url is correct, also note, cypherdoc: the link(s) in the other thread seems to lead to a 404) EDIT: put quotation marks on quote
|
|
|
Awesome. The Litecoiners are being really supportive ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) 1) Sold 10.73603999 LTC by price 0.0061 BTC (total 0.06548984 BTC -0.5%) 2) Sold 250 LTC by price 0.0061 BTC (total 1.525 BTC -0.5%) 3) Sold 230 LTC by price 0.0061 BTC (total 1.403 BTC -0.5%) 4) Sold 1375.64854158 LTC by price 0.006053 BTC (total 8.32680062 BTC -0.5%) 5) Sold 133.61541843 LTC by price 0.006053 BTC (total 0.80877412 BTC -0.5%)
sum: 12.12906458, which I sent directly to the donation address, tx_id: d65929f5652f8bbac22039773476c8a61c62967bb2444401dfece54698968a36
|
|
|
Hello, I've made a survey for bitcoin. It is a short survey will optional questions. I will submit the results online when I receive enough responses. http://www.kwiksurveys.com?u=BitcoinSurvey If you do the survey you can optionally give your email address at the end and I will try to email the results of the survey. Thanks. cool. I'd rather subscribe to this topic than give my email ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
That's a myth. It's possible to have large pools without them having control of the blocks, and thus, without a security risk. Also there's p2pool.
I can imagine how such a pool could work in theory, yes. But it would need special miner software and I don't see any actual implementation, not to mention a popular one (please prove me wrong on this!). Also, it would still be easy for a pool operator to distribute two types of software, one auditable and one crook. For the user it's almost impossible to distinguish, yet for the security of btc it is crucial. p2pool is growing quite popular in the litecoin community, it seems.
|
|
|
Also: A low incentive would decrease hashpower (as you fear) and therefore security of the blockchain. Awareness of this might trigger users to pay more fees in order to have better security, I'm not sure about this. The current behaviour of miners is not towards security at all, much the opposite (pools!). Citing "security" as justification to push a pro pooled-miner development is a blatant lie. To really improve security, one has to consider incentives for miners to give up on big pools and return to solo or small groups operation. I was thinking about an attack by an indiviual, corporation, bank or government (agency). Pooled mining protects against that just as well as long as pool ops don't turn evil or cartel up.
|
|
|
Gavin, thanks for all your hard work. I am sure you know this, but there are many people, hidden away in the background, that are impressed with your efforts. You have a sound strategic vision and have done important work in this crucial early stage. As an experienced professional, you already know that these bugs do happen in complex software. For us less-experienced people, please keep letting us know how to test the code or otherwise contribute.
Thanks again.
+1 Many thanks to Gavin and all the other devs that contribute
|
|
|
I'm happy to receive litecoin donations. However: I will convert these to BTC using btc-e.com pretty much immediately (trying not to crash the market, though). So in case we don't get to deliver our money to the Project, I might not be able to give you back the full amount of LTC you donated.
LTC donation address: LQoxjfjJWcWh3pNRVDJmaDHWBLoejju27X
Sent LTC 2000 to the address above. Tx id cbfd73a3adfbc1cd6e98976338b0dc070cd754a28f6d4d512f5fbd6801d95f2cPlease report the BTC equivalent at the time of conversion. If the project doesn't happen, you can return it as BTC to 15So2KKtcnBs7Vpx1TNcajSohba5ScoTSr Thanks for your generous donation, freequant! I converted the 2000 LTC to BTC 12.03046289 as follows: 1) Sold 100 LTC by price 0.006101 BTC (total 0.6101 BTC -0.5%) 2) Sold 7.11581168 LTC by price 0.006101 BTC (total 0.04341356 BTC -0.5%) 3) Sold 500 LTC by price 0.0061 BTC (total 3.05 BTC -0.5%) 4) Sold 1392.88418832 LTC by price 0.00605 BTC (total 8.32694933 BTC -0.5%)
and sent them to the donation address (tx_id: a712cf26f5a6407530a99661170a66939ac302ae41cf0a5f2242d25307e3fed5) I would've loved to wait for a better exchange rate, but didn't want to risk having to take an even lower one and since I said I would exchange "right away", I just did it.
|
|
|
best thing: i feel like i gained alot of market/trading experience within a very short time.
I feel the same way at the casino every time I win at a new game:P Haha, good answer. Was thinking along these lines but didn't manage to come up with this.
|
|
|
It's your business, do as you please, users will "vote with their feet" as we say in Germany.
Their feet... or their wallets ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
> "Bitcoin prices fell strongly, which was as expected"
Well, this wasn't natural, it was due to manipulation.
Since when is manipulation of markets not natural? Look at GLD ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) So how could you have expected this, unless *you* are the manipulator.
nice spin!
|
|
|
does intersango currently accept sepa transfers?
yes but slowly, it seems (likely not their fault, though). 10.11.2011 10.11.2011 Intersango LTD Überweisung R100159342PL EUR xxx,00 Kurs 1,0000 28EA---- -xxx,00 yyy,66
(amounts scrambled for privacy)I hope I did everything right... I wasn't able to enter a "reference", so I put my reference (28EA----) into the comments of the transfer form. Money did not pop up on my account yet. I know there's a weekend in between Nov 11th and today, so it's only the 3rd workday and I'm not yet worried. We really need some sort of way to move money around the globe in a faster manner.
|
|
|
Nice project. But are you sure that the guy at PMF is really Max Keiser? Please make sure before you send the funds.
I'll donate 2000 LiteCoins if you can provide a LTC donation address (that's about BTC 13~15 at current exchange rate).
The Project Info on PMF says the following: owner: rishey producers: sherbert, rishey executive producers: PMF Fund directors: rishey editors: rishey cast: Max Keiser
I'm assuming (also the pics match): sherbert = Stacy Herbert, rishey might be Richard Bluestein. Now, I know this is not proof. I twittered him about it, if this doesn't work, I'll mail him ( max@maxkeiser.com). I've been in email contact with that address talking about making bitcoin payments directly to PMF. Should he answer on twitter using @maxkeiser, we can be pretty sure it's him, right? I'm happy to receive litecoin donations. However: I will convert these to BTC using btc-e.com pretty much immediately (trying not to crash the market, though). So in case we don't get to deliver our money to the Project, I might not be able to give you back the full amount of LTC you donated. LTC donation address: LQoxjfjJWcWh3pNRVDJmaDHWBLoejju27X
|
|
|
|