theymos finally sent me an IP-redacted seclog AFTER Twipple quoted theymos sending the IP-unredacted one. +---------------------+---------------+----------+ | UTC Time | ip | type | +---------------------+---------------+----------+ | 2015-01-25 14:57:57 | x | Password | | 2015-01-25 17:53:01 | x | Password | | 2015-01-31 10:49:55 | x | Password | | 2015-01-31 10:53:13 | x | Password | +---------------------+---------------+----------+ Password events 2 & 3 were from IPs in a netblock with munir.ahmed @ ptcl.net.pk in the WHOIS. Googled that email and found http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=CZPFGta1 - is that Ume? abuse @ rdsnet.ro in WHOIS for the first IP. jacek @ euronet.net.pl & piotrs @ euronet.net.pl in WHOIS for the last IP. In an account sale, I can see if seller password starts as x (their original password), is provided to an escrow as x, the escrow changes it to y, gives it to the buyer as y, and the buyer changes it to z. That's 2 changes. But why change the password 4 times? This all makes less sense as time goes on. Yes , thats Ume. So Twipple changed the password on 25th , and provided it to Ume (for the loan) . Then Ume changed the password himself. (2nd one). Then when he sold it to me, He changed the password to the one is the PM image(3rd one), and then I am the last one to change it(4th) . So this is the proof that the real Twipple, Ume and this Twipple are 3 individuals as their IPs are different, right?
|
|
|
I've to think twice before clicking on any link. I usually only click on blog links and news articles but still there is a doubt if it could be a malicious link or not as many such incidents have taken place. I guess the forum can add a restriction for newbies to post links as a safety measure or could use any software that could avoid these links from being posted. Usually on other forums, I have seen an ability to add *spam* or *url removed* type of warnings when anybody posts a malicious link.
|
|
|
Shocking to read people accusing the dadice site which was said to be a trustworthy site before. Every gambling or dice site is definitely risky but to accuse some website without having any open scam accusation is weird. Hope this site never turns out to be a scam site and they keep paying their users as before and this speculation proves to be false. The campaign has really helped a lot of users ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Just because the campaign worked out, doesn't mean it is not a scam. At this stage it is a probable scam, so is the reason why there is no scam accusation against it . But all those related have already been negative repped. That's the case with 99% of this sites which promise too much in return for the investment made and one should think 100 times before investing in such websites. That's what the issue here as well and that's why I said that I hope that they don't become insolvent and bankrupt which can lead to many investors losing their money. Here I would blame the people who invested as well as it wasn't a wise decision.
|
|
|
Okay, I think I can do that but 0.2 is pretty small. You should make it 0.35 minimum
I can't offer more than $0.2 as it's a take it or leave it offer. If anyone else wants to offer that amount for this app, one is free to choose that offer. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) In any case, here the referral too gets $0.8 from the app on installing it so they too profit.
|
|
|
Flipkart voucher worth Rs. 200 available.
any discount on this voucher ? Sorry. No discount available.
|
|
|
Usually you will get 1$ or so for every app downloaded with your referral code, right?
This app is offering $0.8 per referral and only for the first 5 referrals.
|
|
|
Shocking to read people accusing the dadice site which was said to be a trustworthy site before. Every gambling or dice site is definitely risky but to accuse some website without having any open scam accusation is weird. Hope this site never turns out to be a scam site and they keep paying their users as before and this speculation proves to be false. The campaign has really helped a lot of users ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
post in Indian section then if this offer only for Indians
Where is the Services section of India? I can see only a Marketplace (India) section while this is the only Services section.
|
|
|
MCD has always been striving for time (in seconds). I've been asked once to visit an MCD restaurant and note the time when I place an order and get the food in seconds and that proved how much they value their time. Now we don't need to keep rushing at the counter and screaming out for the food. Robots will value us more ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Everything you've experienced... Now 50 times faster... ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) My cousin used to work for MCD few years back while schooling. Glad that he is no longer working for them else he would be unemployed ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) Why am I feeling that all restaurants will be having only robots as employees? So many people would be left unemployed when actually these robots aren't that necessary if the time parameter is ignored.
|
|
|
MCD has always been striving for time (in seconds). I've been asked once to visit an MCD restaurant and note the time when I place an order and get the food in seconds and that proved how much they value their time. Now we don't need to keep rushing at the counter and screaming out for the food. Robots will value us more ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
Minor change to the signatures, please update them as soon as possible. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Updated ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Hope the bot now doesn't say signature deleted.
|
|
|
Correct. Your trust network is assumed to consist of people who are basically reasonable. So if any trusted ratings are negative (which means "this person is probably a scammer, watch out!"), then this should be taken very seriously. That's why a single negative rating can easily cause a loss of 100+ trust points in this new algorithm. And if the most recent rating is negative, then this is a strong indicator that the person may have been running a long con which has turned into a full-blown scam.
If anyone is abusing this by reposting negative trust unnecessarily or giving out negative trust too easily, then you should remove them from your trust network.
@bold: This may lead to an abuse of feedback left by Default Trust members. I can't imagine now how one scammers account will look like with the max limit being 9999. Is it possible to have a notification when a feedback is left? If not, it would be useful if the feedback system has a time attached to the date. It helps to know when a person was left a feedback if there are many members who have left a feedback on the same day.
|
|
|
There are some useful changes, but the first score needs to be rescaled. It varies too much if one trust is added or removed. Makes anyone in Default trust much more powerful and those outside it more worthless.
Muhammed Zakir's rating shows as ???
already reported about this ?? ? bug to admin theymos The code is : if(score < 0) return ?? ? (orange) Hence it returned ?? ?
|
|
|
Thanks for the clarification. However, I can see that people have got triple the number of ratings in their account. I can see 13 as my trust score. First number is the trust rating and second number is the negative feedback I've received ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif)
|
|
|
I was changing something. It should be fixed now. Nothing to worry about.
Thanks dear but something's wrong with the trust as well.
|
|
|
My trust rating is 13 when it was 1 earlier. I hope we are safe.
|
|
|
Same here when trying to open my PM's: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FfEofVx9.png&t=665&c=genpArRfVIvDVg) Yeah me too. I thought that my account got hacked or it's a problem of my ISP. One page opened and was completely blank before I got this error message.
|
|
|
Why am I getting an error message while opening threads now: Hacking attempt?
|
|
|
|