Bitcoin Forum
July 10, 2024, 09:06:57 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 [587] 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 ... 646 »
11721  Other / Meta / Re: delete Investor-based games section on: May 20, 2015, 05:45:04 PM
>I'd assume theymos wouldn't want the site shut down and/or face other legal issues.
Perhaps, but AFAIK promoting unregistered securities & unlicensed online gambling is not strictly legal in US either, is it?

>Please point out where the forum is being overrun with CP, drugs and guns.
My point precisely. The forum is not being overrun by CP, drug & gun sales, without subforums being created for any of that. Because against forum policy.

Bitcointalk is not about providing a platform for degenerate gamblers, it's about discussion and promotion of Bitcoin. Having Bitcoin associated with ponzis is bad for Bitcoin. Promoting ponzis on Bitcointalk is bad for Bitcoin. This is prima facie shit, the fact that I need to explain this is, frankly, worrying.

This forum is not powerless at policing its policies. Millions of dollars were donated to Bitcointalk (not millions at the time of donation, but thanks to BTC price increase). If you feel that's not enough to pay for forum moderation, I guess I got nothing.

I agree with you. Bitcoin being associated with Gambling and Ponzis is bad for bitcoin as well as bitcoiners. I thought of suggesting these sections to be shut down but I knew that nobody would support me. Their reasons would be, people are sensible enough to know what is a ponzi or casino, the members would advertise through other means on the forum, they would message members to invest in ponzis, the forum doesn't take responsibility of any scams and so on. The discussion again comes to square one and for me since BCT is so far the most popular bitcoin forums, it's sad that it supports these sections which is simply for money laundering. Bitcoins being anonymous makes it a victim to these ponzi websites and casinos.
11722  Economy / Services / Re: Paying 0.1 BTC for Rebranding [Escrowed] on: May 20, 2015, 03:49:30 PM
My suggestions:

FBsocial120

120hourgame

Makeabetsocial

Tryyourluck120

Crazy120

Tweetgame120

Gambleandwin120

11723  Economy / Services / Re: BitHorse Twitter Campaign ! *Follow and Retweet* on: May 20, 2015, 03:18:50 PM
Thanks for the payment Smiley
11724  Economy / Services / Re: BitHorse Twitter Campaign ! *Follow and Retweet* on: May 20, 2015, 03:16:48 PM
Twitter handle: bernadette20141

BTC address: 1CMfb5cUG8o3PxPwy9XVDdnaaHS8pz2jps
11725  Economy / Services / Re: Looking for someone to submit site to bitcoin directories on: May 20, 2015, 01:58:30 PM
If you are still looking for someone, I can help you out.
11726  Economy / Services / Re: Transcribe a song + compose a piano piece? on: May 20, 2015, 01:57:09 PM
PM me the details. I have learnt 3 grades of music Smiley
11727  Other / Meta / Re: Quickseller = BadBear, he removed his DefaultTrust on purpose on: May 20, 2015, 09:15:29 AM
IN MY OPINION, QS is more aggressive than Vod, I'm sure he is professional and trusted, but why not try to show a little mercy and make this forum a better place, I believe trust system is only designed to mark the scammer.

I agree. I believe Vod has given feedback to those accounts who have sold illegal keys which is absolutely fine while there was a time QS dint agree with his behavior which was odd.

I have never found fault with all those who are on the DF like Tomatocage and others. They always have an evidence while quoting their claim.  Smiley
11728  Other / Meta / Re: Quickseller's feedback on my account on: May 20, 2015, 09:07:31 AM
Oh come on QS. I still don't care about your trust rating but I'm happy that an arrogant person like you is affected by the default trust position. I did not know that you were obsessed by this position and you got removed because of your own bad deeds of cursing and criticizing me. I haven't done anything wrong on this forum nor will I ever do. People who want to trade with me will still do irrespective of my trust rating. I won't turn into a bad person just because of your arrogance.


You are trying to quote my contradicting statements? LOL! It shows me what kind of a person you are in real life.


1.The fact that you supported the cheat who wanted to scam me and my mother of $1000 and then you wanted to get me sued proves that it's not me who is wrong, it's you.

2. You went on to support a ponzi signature campaign as you were serving as an escrow. You did not even leave a negative on his account because you dint consider it important. Excellent as you served as an escrow right?

3. You created so many accounts and kept on posting through all of those accounts just to earn money to sell them. Selling accounts is unethical and immoral which you showed that you are.

4. You abuse people and hate those who criticize you. The fact that it is you who is screaming here on my thread that I kept criticizing you and wanted you out of the DF proves that you think so small of me when I haven't done anything wrong to you.

5. You make so many assumptions that anyone can be a scammer here which proves that your judgement cannot be trusted.



The issues you had with me:

1. I don't support escrow (Makes me look like a scammer agree)

2. I make the buyer go first (Makes me look like a scammer agree)

3. I said as an example that if I get a better trade, I can back out (I agree but I never said that it was a confirmed trade. That you wanted to assume so that you could leave a feedback which you were dying to do for so long. This got you out of the DF and you keep blaming me for that.)

4. You claim that this is a purchased account.

Anything else that's wrong with me?

1. I used MZ as an escrow for a deal.

2. I went first with MZ and even with another member of this forum who owns get-paid website.

3. I never backed out of any deal till date.

4. Badbear knows the truth and even MZ has proven that the BTC address is the same.


You can note the clear difference between me and you. All your claims have been proven false.



Now you are trying to message Badbear and talk bad about me to get your position back? Go ahead and show me your real side. That's what you are. Not a scam buster but just a show off.
11729  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Self-Driving Trucks Are Going to Hit Us Like a Human-Driven Truck on: May 19, 2015, 09:14:54 PM

Here's what. You said that you cared about animals more than people at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1065213.msg11422085#msg11422085.
You are a people, so you care more about animals than yourself.
This virtually makes you a slave to animals, which are slaves to people.
This makes you a slave to other people, and you said it. Is that what you really want to be?


Quote
Anyways, this discussion is about self driving trucks and not about crushing down animals or being a slave.

Will self driving trucks stop for animals in the road? Or will they crush them down?

Smiley

Yeah I care more for animals than humans and I also said that if I need to save either animals or humans, I would try to save both. I wouldn't crush them down for a human nor would try to protect the goods in the truck like you said.

I don't get your logic about slaves again. Animals and children are innocent and when any crime takes place against them, it hurts me more than anything else.

Do you really want this poor animal to be crushed down to save your goods?



I believe that self driven cars would stop for animals and humans. They are error free just like computers don't make mistakes. These self driven cars would be safe and would reduce accidents.
11730  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Self-Driving Trucks Are Going to Hit Us Like a Human-Driven Truck on: May 19, 2015, 08:47:34 PM

You need to go back to school. Animals do all this stuff, as well. It's just that people are smarter in the ways that they go about it.

Be a slave if you want. But look it over in detail before you make your final decision. Check out the slavery that Islamic women are in, in the Middle East. Check out the slavery in Morocco, Western Sahara and Mauritania. Once you have a clear picture, come back and tell us that you want to be a slave of other people.

Smiley

I am a Graduate and I haven't learnt to run down over animals in my school/college/university. Where did you learn this from?

In my country, killing animals is a crime and if you crush them down, you'll be arrested (most probably).

What has slavery got to do with this? You just asked me whose life is better and I said that of animals. It's humans to make make others slaves and not animals.

Anyways, this discussion is about self driving trucks and not about crushing down animals or being a slave.
11731  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: gambling..its taking me out.. on: May 19, 2015, 07:41:06 PM
Just don't visit this forum for a month. Concentrate on the things that matter to you in your real life and then the addiction of gambling will vanish. Gambling just eats you and makes a person greedy for more and more money and he ends up to be a pauper.
11732  Economy / Currency exchange / Re: - Available 2.06 BTC- Postepay/PayPal/Cash - [ESCROW] on: May 19, 2015, 07:15:21 PM
Do you buy Skrill for BTC? What's your rate? Are you willing to use escrow?

My rate for 2.06 BTC is €450,00.

I use Skrill only in Euro with Escrow no problem.
My Skrill email: zackkomb@gmail.com

Do you want to initiate the transaction (I will contact the escrow and send you the escrow contact details on this forum)?

Thank You.

I have only 5.82 Euro in my account and am looking for a 1:1 transaction only. Sad
11733  Economy / Currency exchange / Re: - Available 2.06 BTC- Postepay/PayPal/Cash - [ESCROW] on: May 19, 2015, 07:03:36 PM
Do you buy Skrill for BTC? What's your rate? Are you willing to use escrow?
11734  Other / Meta / Re: Quickseller's feedback on my account on: May 19, 2015, 06:37:14 PM
Accounts are not mainly sold to scam others, however when combined with your sketchy behavior, I think a warning is appropriate if your account is in fact purchased.

I am not going to remove my rating. You got what you clearly wanted and got me removed from BadBear's list. My comments are factually accurate and give you a lot more leeway then is appropriate IMO. I am not going to remove my rating. You can petition theymos to get it removed if you want however I think it would be extremely unlikely considering that it is not spam.

You are welcome to try to figure out who is appropriate to trust with your money however that doesn't mean that you establish sketchy trading practices in the meantime.

I did not say in my comment that you backed out of a deal, I said that you openly admitted that you would back out of a deal if you could find another one on better terms. The context of the conversation was that of when the terms of a trade were confirmed and agreed to by all parties.

Glad that Badbear doesn't trust you anymore and this behavior will only bring you down in life QS. You have stooped so low in my eyes.

And regarding my account being purchased. I am a criminal lawyer's child and I don't hide using my alt accounts unlike you with your QS, AS accounts and you don't bother to fight with your real name. My account name has my real name as I have nothing to hide. I'm definitely more educated than you as I don't have any personal grudges against you and as you say that I wanted you out of the trust list. I don't care about you as a member QS. I don't know why are you giving yourself so much importance. I wouldn't even care about the PM of my country and get him out of the seat even though he is wasting my country's money. Why would I care about getting you out of a virtual trust list? Is this forum even so important in my life? May be it's important for you as you have the habit of creating multiple accounts and posting through each of them in order to earn some bitcoins. I still have my brain intact to use only my main account to post and not like you to create alt accounts and earn through them.

Don't remove your feedback as that gives you peace. I'm not going to lock this thread and will keep it open to show others what kind of a person you are.
11735  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Self-Driving Trucks Are Going to Hit Us Like a Human-Driven Truck on: May 19, 2015, 06:22:10 PM
What makes you think that I want you to do anything, either leave this forum or not, or anything else for that matter?

Animals were given to people, by God, as property of people. While mankind is not supposed to intentionally torture animals, he also has the right to do with them as he wishes if he is their owner.

Now watch this. You want people to be under animals. Because you want this, you place yourself under the animals. And God has given you the right to do that if you really want.

God also has given people the authority over animals. So, the thing that you are doing is placing yourself under animals, under other people. Do you really want to be a slave to other people that badly, just like the animals are?

Smiley

@bold: Definitely it's a yes. I would love being an animal rather than a human. Humans rape, murder, rob and are selfish compared to animals who harm humans when they feel a danger.
11736  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Self-Driving Trucks Are Going to Hit Us Like a Human-Driven Truck on: May 19, 2015, 05:46:58 PM

You're so inhuman. You don't mind a life being lost but are worried about the expenses it will cost you. Have you ever run down an animal/human in your life and hence you are supporting it?

I'm shocked and saddened the way you think animals should be killed. The more people like you will say such things, the more people like me will pray for the life of animals and the end of this damn world. Inhumanity sucks.

I'm not so worried about goods, but my own safety and the safety of other people on the road is more important than any animal that strays into my path.

When I was a nipper we used to take an hour-long bus journey to school through pheasant shooting country (so they were dead meat anyway).

One particular driver thought nothing of risking 40 little lives to avoid one pheasant that was dumb enough to stray into the road. He would slam on the brakes, veer everywhere and throw people all over the bus. Eventually he was fired after one near calamity too many.

We need to remember that erikalui is a little girl. She might be a young teenager, but maybe not even that old. She is here to learn about life.

I don't understand why her parents allowed her into this forum, where you can find just about anything that you want. I'd break my kids in a little easier than that.

Smiley

And I care about animals more than humans. Animals are innocent and they have a right to live rather than humans who have a brain and can think evil. If I have to chose between saving a human/animal, I'll try to save both but not crush an animal to save the other.

@bold: Why do you want me to leave this forum? Because I don't appreciate your inhuman thoughts and with the fact that you prefer to kill animals? I'm proud that I don't think so low. That's because of my parents and I'm proud of their upbringing.
11737  Other / Meta / Re: Quickseller's feedback on my account on: May 19, 2015, 05:41:20 PM
You don't have a negative rating. Nor have you ever had one from me. You saying that I have a negative against you is libel.

Your post history is consistent of a farmed account and farmed accounts are almost always either sold it for sale. My logic was valid.

If you don't care about feedback I left you then you would not care above the above statement. Roll Eyes

You do act very sketchy as you have often not accepted escrow while having a very limited trade history. Now why don't you tell me what user group is that consistent with?


I don't believe my interpretation of your statement was a misunderstanding however I am willing to compromise and note that you claim it to be a misunderstanding.

You have a dislike for me that's what I meant.

@bold: Now who can understand this better than QS who has been doing this for ages. Account selling/sales are just ridiculous and mainly bought to scam others. Doesn't your behavior seem fishy as you might have sold accounts with feedback as well?

@blue: Appearing fishy or sketchy is fine. I don't want to get scammed by members over here and mind you, I have been inactive for 1.5 years and when I came here, people started screaming escrow escrow and recommending me their personal escrows. That's why I wasn't sure to use escrow till I was sure with whom I'm dealing with. MZ seemed cool and considerate and hence I chose him. It takes me time to understand who is trusted and who is not as my money was earned and not gifted to me. I often take precautions before trading as I've been cheated by my own family members so who are members here? I don't even know you personally nor others here.

@green: I would just request you to remove the rating. If anytime in future I do seem fishy with an escrow or in my trades, don't hesitate to add it but now it just seems senseless as I've not even backed out of my deals not have tried to. Me stating an example and you giving me a feedback for the same is weird. My having a sketchy behavior has nothing to do with your feedback rating. At least give me a chance to survive without having your account name on my account without having any dealings/trades that are fishy.


If you check my trades, you'll always realize that my prices are exact or too high. $5 Amazon for the same price, 1:1 transactions. I simply don't accept deals that will make me bear a loss and hence backing out of deals because I'll earn a profit is silly. MZ also knows that when I sold my Flipkart voucher worth Rs. 500, I sold it for the same rate $7.9.


Be in the DefaultTrust list is an obsessions for everyone, if BadBear thought that remove quickseller was a right thing then probably he's right. However he can still continue leave trust, the unique thing is that his trust will not be trusted (from the point of view of the 'trust system) anymore.

I did not understand this before but now I can see the effect it has on members here.
11738  Other / Meta / Re: Quickseller's feedback on my account on: May 19, 2015, 05:19:57 PM
There is a huge difference between a negative and neutral rating. A negative rating affects your trust score directly while a neutral is just comments. To say that I left you a negative is an outright lie. Period.

If you claim to not care about the feedback that I left you then what was the point of opening up this thread? Roll Eyes



The clear reason was this "This account was also likely purchased on or around February 2015, so the registration date and time online should not be considered to be accurate for this account."

How much time does it take a person to understand English?

Now I will keep this thread open as you made other accusations too against me and did not remove your feedback. Now it affects me as you are blaming me for your removal. Called me a sketchy user, suspicious and went on with your baseless claims. I don't feel I deserve it. Simple.

What reason do you have to leave me a negative feedback? There are people here who do not find it reasonable. Why do I deserve the feedback when you had a misunderstanding about me? I never even said that I will backout from a deal after confirming the trade so your feedback does not make any sense.


And yeah, I did not lie. By mistake I wrote negative feedback which will keep affecting you now.

Just remove it and the matter is closed. I don't want your name in my account. It will keep haunting me.
11739  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Self-Driving Trucks Are Going to Hit Us Like a Human-Driven Truck on: May 19, 2015, 05:08:22 PM

Trucks usually are there to carry products for people. If trucks slam on the breaks to keep from crushing an animal, often the product is damaged in the back part of the truck. Sometimes trucks roll over and are damaged making it so that the truck owner has to pay lots of money to get them fixed.

It is good to crush little animals that run out into the road, just to save the product in the trucks from getting damaged.

When you grow up, perhaps you could start a school for animals where you would teach them to look both ways.

Robot trucks might stop for the animals, thereby damaging the product and the robot trucks. Good thing human drivers understand that it is best to crush the animals.

Smiley

You're so inhuman. You don't mind a life being lost but are worried about the expenses it will cost you. Have you ever run down an animal/human in your life and hence you are supporting it?

I'm shocked and saddened the way you think animals should be killed. The more people like you will say such things, the more people like me will pray for the life of animals and the end of this damn world. Inhumanity sucks.
11740  Other / Meta / Re: Quickseller's feedback on my account on: May 19, 2015, 05:00:34 PM
No. That is not what is reasonable to say is what setting up escrow means. It would be ridiculous to think that a deal would be set in stone if someone were to simply help as escrow for a deal that may not even have a buyer yet - there wouldn't even be any deal to potentially be set in stone yet.

I do not have my own definition of getting sued.


No it does not. My feedback is fact based and does not reflect any personal opinions.

You do not need to have actually scammed to receive a negative. That however does not matter because I have never left you a negative trust rating, it was neutral the entire time. IMO the fact that you are making such a big deal out of a neutral rating is pretty clear evidence that your prior comments criticizing me was in fact baiting me to leave a negative in order to have a reason to complain to get me removed.

I am saying that the only two people who always show up in the QS threads are the same two people. That is my conclusion.

I am glad that you adhere to the Christian belief that everyone should be respected for their opinions regardless if they are the same or not.

When did I give you a negative? Do you have a screenshot of such negative? I can tell you right now, as mentioned above none of my ratings against you were ever negative. There is a glaring difference between a neutral and a negative and it would be very difficult to make the mistake between the two

Why are you quoting my religion? Please keep me being a Christian away from this and I am not interested if you are a Christian or not. I believe in being good in life and I don't believe in criticizing a person for no reason. Don't know for how long have you been carrying this dislike for me.

Negative or neutral doesn't make a difference. You gave me a feedback just based on a comment makes it look silly.


@bold: Why are you acting like a kid? I am actually imagining you jumping and running from one place to another that erikalui got me removed from the default trust. Mummmaa please help me. I got removed from the default trust.  So childish Cheesy Please grow up dear. The default trust doesn't make a difference to you in real life nor does my feedback matter to me. (You have said this statement so many times in this thread that I have stopped the count  Cheesy)

I never expected to get a negative rating from you nor did I try to provoke you. You got provoked on your own. LOL!

I don't care about the feedback you left me but your accusations were what made me upset and you calling me an alt and that I make small trades to earn trust. You yourself have admitted that my criticism has affected you. You finally lost your cool with my remarks and your mistake costed you to lose your position in the trusted feedback.

"Yes you have criticized me previously. I did not leave any kind of trust any of those large number of times. The fact that I left you a neutral in response to a post that you made that was critical of me is a consequence as the reason for the trust was because you openly stated that you were willing to back out of deals after all terms were agreed to." "The OP has spoken negatively about me a large number of times and the reason for the feedback just so happened to be on a post that was critical of me. Speaking critically of someone does not give them a free pass to say or engage in other scammy behavior."

I dint even write any such thing in my this thread and asked you a reason about the feedback. You have been holding a negative place in your heart for me and we eager to counter attack me which is hilarious.

Don't blame me for provoking you. I'll start laughing now.



Too busy to look... has he been AXED finally? Is the wicked WITCH dead?

Oh so sad.

Erikalui keep fighting the good fight don't let QS bully you and know that many in the community support your efforts to call out this jerk.

Sorry but I don't support your words. I don't hate QS but his actions are not justified. His anger, arrogance and the way he assumes someone to be suspicious/scammer has led to his removal. I used to request him not to assume but he never listened to me and see his frustration now. He is blaming me when it should be the opposite.
Pages: « 1 ... 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 [587] 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 ... 646 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!